Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Eagle Creek Timber Sales, Mt. Hood National Forest, Clackamas County, OR
Federal RegisterOct 18, 1995
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service, will prepare a supplement to the
draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for Eagle Creek Timber Sales
on the Estacada Ranger District of the Mt. Hood National Forest. The
draft EIS was released in July 1993. Following the release of the draft
EIS, the Record of Decision for Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau
of Land Management Planning Documents Within the Range of the Northern
Spotted Owl (Northwest Forest Plan) was signed on April 13, 1994. This
new direction will require changes to the alternatives in the draft
EIS. The alternatives will be revised to be in compliance with the new
direction and be re-analyzed as a supplement to the existing analysis.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and questions about this supplement
to the Estacada Ranger District, Mt. Hood National Forest, 595 NW
Industrial Way, Estacada, Oregon 97023, Phone: (503) 630-6861.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John Berry, Estacada District Ranger, Mt. Hood National Forest. Mt.
Hood National Forest, 595 NW Industrial Way, Estacada, Oregon 97023,
Phone: (503) 630-6861.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The original proposed action was developed
in accordance with the direction contained in the Mt. Hood National
Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (1991). The Northwest Forest
Plan has resulted in new circumstances and substantial changes to the
original proposed action. The Northwest Forest Plan has designated this
area as a Key Watershed and also allocated portions of the area to Late
Successional and Riparian Reserves. Changes to the proposed action
include: (1) No road building in the roadless area and no timber
harvest within the Late Successional Reserve; (2) designing the harvest
units consistent with the Standards and Guidelines in the Northwest
Forest Plan; and (3) incorporating the results of the watershed
analysis. Comments received from the draft EIS will be considered in
the preparation of the supplement.
The supplement will be prepared and circulated in the same manner
(exclusive of scoping) as the draft EIS (40 CFR 1502.9). The supplement
to the draft EIS is expected to be available for public review and
comment in February 1996. The comment period on the draft supplement
will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency's
notice of availability appears in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes it is important to give reviewers
notice at this early stage of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
the draft supplement to the EIS must structure their participation in
the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and
alerts an agency to the reviewer position and contentions. Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. versus NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft supplement
stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS
may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon versus Hodel,
803 F.2d. 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc.
versus Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Due to these
court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close of the 45 day comment period
so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the
Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issue
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the supplement to the
draft EIS should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft supplement.
Comments may also address the adequacy of the supplement or the merits
of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the supplement.
(Reviewer may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points).
After the 45 day comment period ends on the supplement to the draft
EIS, the comments will be analyzed and considered by the Forest Service
in preparing the final EIS. The final EIS is scheduled to be completed
by June 1996. In the final EIS, the Forest Service is required to
respond to the comments received (40 CFR 1503.4). The Responsible
Official, Forest Supervisor Roberta Moltzen will consider the comments,
responses, environmental consequences discussed in the final EIS, and
applicable laws, regulations, and policies in making a decision and
reasons for the decision in the Record of Decision.
That decision will meet the criteria of Section 2001(e) of Public
Law 104-19 and is not appealable. This decision is subject to judicial
review only in the United States court for the district of Oregon. As
required under Section 2001(f)(1) of Public Law 104-19, any challenge
to this project must be filed in the district court within 15 days
after the advertisement of the sale.
Dated: October 5, 1995.
Roberta Moltzen,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 95-25798 Filed 10-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.