Clean Air Act Proposed Interim Approval of the Operating Permits Program; Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department, Pima County Department of Environmental Quality, Pinal County Air Quality Control District, Arizona: Extension of Comment Period
Federal RegisterSep 18, 1995
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 70
[AD-FRL-5296-8]
Clean Air Act Proposed Interim Approval of the Operating Permits
Program; Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department, Pima County Department of
Environmental Quality, Pinal County Air Quality Control District,
Arizona: Extension of Comment Period
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed Rule; Extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is extending the comment period for a proposed rule
published July 13, 1995 (60 FR 36083) in which EPA proposed interim
approval of the title V operating permits program submitted by the
State of Arizona. The Arizona program is comprised of programs from the
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, the Maricopa County
Environmental Services Department, the Pima County Department of
Environmental Quality, and the Pinal County Air Quality Control
District.
At the request of the Arizona Center for Law in the Public
Interest, EPA is
[[Page 48086]]
extending the comment period for 30 days.
DATES: The comment period on the proposed rule is extended until
September 25, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Regina Spindler, Mail Code
A-5-2, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Air and Toxics
Division, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regina Spindler at (415) 744-1251.
Dated: September 5, 1995.
Felicia Marcus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-23108 Filed 9-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.