Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Petition for Review
Federal RegisterAug 17, 1995
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5278-5]
Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Petition for Review
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement
agreement in the following case: Western States Petroleum Association
v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 95-70034 (9th Cir.). These
petitions for review were filed under Sec. 307(b) of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
7607(b), contesting certain aspects of EPA's interim approval of the
Washington State title V program of November 9, 1994.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as
parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withhold or withdraw consent to the proposed
agreement if the comments disclose facts or circumstances that indicate
that such agreement is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or
inconsistent with the requirements of the Act.
A copy of the proposed settlement agreement is available from
Phyllis J. Cochran, Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of
General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street,
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should
be sent to Adan Schwartz, Esq. at the above address and must be
submitted on or before September 18, 1995.
Dated: August 8, 1995.
Gary Guzy,
Acting Assistant Administrator (General Counsel).
[FR Doc. 95-20425 Filed 8-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.