Utah Regulatory Program

Federal RegisterJan 24, 1995

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 944

Utah Regulatory Program

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening and extension of public comment period

on proposed amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSM is announcing receipt of revisions and additional

explanatory information pertaining to a previously proposed amendment

to the Utah regulatory program (hereinafter, the ``Utah program'')

under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA).

The revision and additional explanatory information for Utah's proposed

rules pertain to the confidentiality of coal exploration information.

The amendment is intended to revise the Utah program to be consistent

with the corresponding Federal regulations.

DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., m.s.t., February

8, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed or hand delivered to

Thomas E. Ehmett at the address listed below.

Copies of the Utah program, the proposed amendment, and all written

comments received in response to this document will be available for

public review at the addresses listed below during normal business

hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Each requester may

receive one free copy of the proposed amendment by contacting OSM's

Albuquerque Field Office.

Thomas E. Ehmett, Acting Director, Albuquerque Field Office, Office of

Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 505 Marquette Avenue NW.,

Suite 1200, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Utah Coal Regulatory Program, Division of Oil, Gas and Mining, 355 West

North Temple, 3 Triad Center, Suite 350, Salt Lake City, Utah 84180-

1203, Telephone: (801) 538-5340.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas E. Ehmett, Telephone: (505)

766-1486.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Utah Program

On January 21, 1981, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally

approved the Utah program. General background information on the Utah

program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of

comments, and the conditions of approval of the Utah program can be

found in the January 21, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 5899).

Subsequent actions concerning Utah's program and program amendments can

be found at 30 CFR 944.15, 944.16, and 944.30.

II. Proposed Amendment

By letter dated September 9, 1994, Utah submitted a proposed

amendment to its program pursuant to SMCRA (administrative record No.

UT-971). Utah submitted the proposed amendment in response to the

required program amendment at 30 CFR 944.16(a). The provisions of the

Utah Coal Mining Rules that Utah proposed to revise were at Utah

Administrative Rule (Utah Admin. R.) 645-203-200, Confidentiality.

OSM announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the September

27, 1994, Federal Register (59 FR 49227), provided an opportunity for a

public hearing or meeting on its substantive adequacy, and invited

public comment on its adequacy (administrative record No. UT-976).

Because no one requested a public hearing or meeting, none was held.

The public comment period ended on October 27, 1994.

During its review of the amendment, OSM identified concerns

relating to the provisions of Utah's rules at Utah Admin. R. 645-203-

200 and 645-203-210, confidentiality of coal exploration information.

OSM notified Utah of the concerns by letter dated November 15, 1994

(administrative record No. UT-991). Utah responded in a letter dated

January 5, 1994, by submitting a revised amendment and additional

explanatory information (administrative record No. UT-1003).

Utah proposes revisions to Utah Admin. R. 645-203-200, by deleting

the phrase ``or that the information is confidential under the

standards of the Federal Act.'' In addition, Utah provides additional

explanatory information pertaining to Utah Admin. R. 645-203-210, by

stating that there is some question as to the repetitious aspects of

Utah Admin. R. 645-203-210. Utah states that Utah Admin. R. 654-203-210

requires the Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (Division) to ``keep''

information confidential while Utah Admin. R. 645-203-200 directs the

Division to ``not make'' information available.

III. Public Comment Procedures

OSM is reopening the comment period on the proposed Utah program

amendment to provide the public an opportunity to reconsider the

adequacy of the proposed amendment in light of the additional materials

submitted. In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM

is seeking comments on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the

applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If the amendment

is deemed adequate, it will become part of the Utah program.

Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues

proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the

commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated

under DATES or at locations other than the Albuquerque Field Office

will not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included

in the administrative record. [[Page 4582]]

IV. Procedural Determinations

1. Executive Order 12866

This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and

Review).

2. Executive Order 12778

The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required

by section 2 of Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice Reform) and has

determined that this rule meets the applicable standards of subsections

(a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not

applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and

program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated

by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA

(30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11,

732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory

programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based

solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with

SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other

requirements of 30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.

3. National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since

section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency

decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not

constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section

102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.

4332(2)(C)).

4. Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain information collection requirements that

require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507 et seq.).

5. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will

not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).

The State submittal that is the subject of this rule is based upon

counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was

prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a

significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small

entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements

previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In

making the determination as to whether this rule would have a

significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and

assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 944

Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

Dated: January 13, 1995.

Charles E. Sandberg,

Acting Assistant Director, Western Support Center.

[FR Doc. 95-1708 Filed 1-23-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-05-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.