Item Submitted for OMB Review
Federal RegisterJun 1, 1995
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Item Submitted for OMB Review
The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the
following item has been submitted to OMB for review pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). Requests for
information, including copies of the collection of information and
supporting documentation, should be directed to Bruce A. Dombrowski,
Deputy Managing Director, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., Room 1082, Washington, DC 20573, telephone number
(202) 523-5800. Comments may be submitted to the agency and to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal
Maritime Commission, within 15 days after the date of the Federal
Register in which this notice appears.
Summary of Item Submitted for OMB Review
46 CFR Part 582
FMC requests an extension of clearance for 46 CFR part 582, which
implements section 10(b)(2) of the Shipping Act of 1984 provisions. The
Act provides that no common carrier by water may rebate, refund, or
remit any portion of its rates except in accordance with its tariffs or
service contracts. Section 15(b) of the Act requires the chief
executive officer of each common carrier and certain other persons
designated by the Commission to file a periodic written certification
that anti-rebating policies have been implemented. The Commission
estimates that approximately 2100 NVOCCs, 500 VOCCs and 1800 freight
forwarders will file anti-rebate certifications on each even-numbered
year. Annual respondent burden for complying with the regulation is
2,200 manhours (\1/2\ hour per response). Estimated annual cost to the
Federal Government is $5,700; estimated annual cost to respondents is
$59,400.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-13313 Filed 5-31-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.