Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Tennessee: Approval of Revisions to the Portion of the State Implementation Plan Regulating Volatile Organic Compounds and Determining General Alternate Emission Standards

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[TN-98-1-5644; TN-103-1-6087; TN-108-1-6088; TN-109-1-6089; FRL-4860-5]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Tennessee:

Approval of Revisions to the Portion of the State Implementation Plan

Regulating Volatile Organic Compounds and Determining General Alternate

Emission Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 25, 1992, and March 22, 1993, the State of Tennessee

through the Department of Environment and Conservation submitted

revisions to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) regarding general

definitions, control of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and general

alternate emission standards.

On November 5, 1992, and April 22, 1993, the State submitted

revisions to the VOC regulations and general alternate emission

standards in the Memphis-Shelby County portion of the Tennessee SIP on

behalf of Memphis-Shelby County. Since Memphis-Shelby County adopts the

State's regulations by reference, the submitted SIP revisions were

essentially identical to the regulations in the State's submittal.

EPA is approving or conditionally approving revisions to the

Tennessee SIP and the Memphis-Shelby County portion of the Tennessee

SIP as meeting the requirements of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990

(CAA). The State and Memphis submittals addressed, or committed to

address, all of the deficiencies identified in the State's VOC

regulations and documented by EPA in letters to the State dated

November 9, 1987, June 10, 1987, and January 25, 1990, and to Memphis-

Shelby County dated November 9, 1987. EPA is disapproving the deletion

of rule 1200-3-18-.03 Standard for New Sources.

DATES: This final rule will be effective June 17, 1994 unless notice is

received by May 18, 1994 that someone wishes to submit adverse or

critical comments. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will

be published in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the material submitted by the State of Tennessee

may be examined during normal business hours at the following

locations:

Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (Air Docket 6102),

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC

20460.

Region IV, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency,

345 Courtland Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30365.

Division of Air Pollution Control, Tennessee Department of

Environment and Conservation, L & C Annex, 9th Floor, 401 Church

Street, Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1531.

Air Pollution Control Section, Memphis-Shelby County Health

Department, 814 Jefferson Avenue, room 437, Memphis, Tennessee 38105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Denman, Air Programs Branch,

United States Environmental Protection Agency, 345 Courtland Street,

Atlanta, Georgia 30365, (404) 347-2864.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In May 1988, EPA released 1987 air quality

data which established the degree to which areas throughout the Nation

attained, or failed to attain, the ozone National Ambient Air Quality

Standard (NAAQS) and issued SIP calls for areas that failed to attain.

The Memphis and Nashville areas in Tennessee failed to attain the ozone

NAAQS. On September 7, 1988, at 53 FR 34500, EPA gave notice that SIP

calls were made to the nonattainment areas.

The SIP call letters, which were sent to Governors and State Air

Pollution Control Directors, requested that the states respond to the

SIP calls in two phases. The response to Phase I was due approximately

one year following the issuance of final EPA policy program

requirements for ozone and carbon monoxide nonattainment areas and/or

reauthorization of the CAA. As part of the first phase, states were

asked to upgrade SIPs to correct discrepancies in existing SIPs as

compared with EPA's existing guidance under section 108 and part D

(related to reasonably available control technology (RACT) for VOC

emissions) and to adopt control measures to satisfy any commitments in

the part D SIP's to adopt RACT measures.

In 1990, Congress amended the CAA to address, among other things,

continued nonattainment of the ozone NAAQS (Public Law 101-549, 104

Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q). Section 182(a)(2)(A) of

the CAA requires states with existing areas designated nonattainment

for ozone and classified as at least marginal, to submit, by May 15,

1991, revisions to the SIP that correct or add requirements concerning

RACT in accordance with pre-amendment guidance.1 The SIP call

letters interpreted that guidance and indicated the corrections

necessary for specific nonattainment areas.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\Among other things, the pre-amendment guidance consists of

the Post-87 Policy, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987); the Blue Book,

``Issues relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and

Deviations, Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987,

Federal Register Notice;'' and the existing Control Techniques

Guidelines (CTGs).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Memphis area is classified as marginal nonattainment and the

Nashville area is classified as moderate nonattainment2 for the

ozone NAAQS. Therefore, these areas are subject to the RACT fix-up

requirement and the May 15, 1991, deadline.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\The Memphis and Nashville areas retained the designations of

nonattainment and were classified by operation of law pursuant to

sections 107(d) and 181 (a) upon enactment of the Amendments. 56 FR

56694 (November 6, 1991).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tennessee failed to meet the May 15, 1991, deadline for the

submittal of corrections to the State (including the State's portion of

the Nashville nonattainment area), Memphis-Shelby County, and some of

the Nashville-Davidson County regulations3. EPA notified the State

on June 25, 1991, that a finding of failure to submit had been made for

the Memphis-Shelby County and Nashville nonattainment areas. This

finding of failure to submit was published at 56 FR 54557 on October

22, 1991. The finding triggered the 18-month time clock for mandatory

application of sanctions under section 179(a) of the CAA and the 2-year

time clock for promulgation of Federal VOC regulations for

nonattainment areas as required by section 110(c)(1).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\On February 16, 1990, July 3, 1991, October 4, 1991, and

January 2, 1992, the State submitted certain corrections to the VOC

RACT rules for Nashville-Davidson County. EPA approved the February

16, 1990, revisions at 56 FR 10171 on March 11, 1991, and the rest

of the amendments at 57 FR 28625 on June 26, 1992.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The State submitted revisions to the Tennessee SIP, including

Nashville, to EPA on June 25, 1992, and on March 22, 1993. The State

submitted SIP revisions to meet the section 182(a)(2)(A) requirement on

behalf of Memphis-Shelby County on November 5, 1992, and on April 22,

1993. EPA found these submittals to be complete on October 6, 1993, and

June 9, 1993, respectively. This finding of completeness stopped the

sanctions clock started on October 22, 1991, for the Memphis-Shelby

County and Nashville nonattainment areas. However, the Federal

Implementation Plan (FIP) clock continued to run. EPA's final approval

action relieves EPA of the FIP obligation for those portions of the

submittal that are being fully approved. EPA is approving the following

revisions except where it is specifically noted that the revision is

being conditionally approved or disapproved.

Chapter 1200-3-2 General Definitions

The following changes were made only to the Tennessee portion of

the SIP, and not to the Memphis portion.

Rule 1200-3-2-.01 General Definitions

The definition of ``air contaminant source'' was revised to correct

a typographical error. The revision added the phrase ``portable fuel-

burning equipment, and incinerators of all types, indoor and,'' to the

definition of ``air contaminant source.''

The definitions of ``air curtain destructor,'' ``open burning,''

``Ringelmann chart,'' ``soiling index,'' ``silicon carbide plant,'' and

``magnetite processing plant'' were deleted.

Minor changes were made to the definitions of ``modification'' and

``reasonably available control technology'' to correct typographical

errors and for clarification.

The definition of ``malfunction'' was revised to correct a

typographical error. The revision added failures that are caused by

poor maintenance, careless operation, or any other preventable upset

condition to the definition of ``malfunction.''

The definition of ``startup'' was revised to specify that ``startup

is the setting in operation of an air contaminant source for the

production of product for sale or use as raw materials or steam or heat

production.''

Definitions of ``continuous emission monitor,'' ``nonattainment

area,'' ``PM-10,'' and ``total suspended particulate (TSP)'' were

added.

Minor revisions to the definitions of ``air pollution,'' ``board,''

and ``cupola'' were withdrawn by the State via letter dated January 11,

1993, from Mr. John W. Walton, Technical Secretary of the Tennessee Air

Pollution Control Board.

Chapter 1200-3-18 Volatile Organic Compounds

Applicability--The applicability requirements have been revised to

state that the rules apply to facilities having potential VOC emissions

of 25 tons per year or greater in Davidson, Hamilton, and Shelby

Counties, and 100 tons per year or greater in all other counties in the

State. The applicability requirements have been revised in the

following rules.

Rule 1200-3-18-.05 Automobile and Light Duty Truck Manufacturing;

Rule 1200-3-18-.12 Can Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-.13 Coil Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-.14 Fabric and Vinyl Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-15 Metal Furniture Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-.16 Surface Coating of Large Appliances;

Rule 1200-3-18-.17 Magnet Wire Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-.18 Solvent Metal Cleaning;

Rule 1200-3-18-.20 Flat Wood Paneling Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-.21 Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and

Products;

Rule 1200-3-18-.26 Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires;

Rule 1200-3-18-.27 Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical

Products; and

Rule 1200-3-18-.28 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning.

Compliance--The following rules have been revised to reference the

compliance provisions in paragraph 1200-3-18-.01(3) and rule 1200-3-18-

.22. Paragraph 1200-3-18-.01(3) contains provisions for standards that

limit the pounds of VOCs per gallon of material and rule 1200-3-18-.22

concerns leaks from gasoline tank trucks and vapor collection systems.

Rule 1200-3-18-.08 Bulk Gasoline Plants;

Rule 1200-3-18-.09 Bulk Gasoline Terminals; and

Rule 1200-3-18-.10 Gasoline Service Stations Stage I.

The following rules have been revised to reference the compliance

provisions in paragraph 1200-3-18-.01(3).

Rule 1200-3-18-.12 Can Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-.14 Fabric and Vinyl Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-.20 Flat Wood Paneling Coating;

Rule 1200-3-18-.21 Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and

Products;

Rule 1200-3-18-.22 Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor

Collection Systems;

Rule 1200-3-18-.23 Petroleum Refinery Equipment Leaks;

Rule 1200-3-18-.25 Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating

Roof Tanks;

Rule 1200-3-18-.26 Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires;

Rule 1200-3-18-.27 Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical

Products;

Rule 1200-3-18-.28 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning; and

Rule 1200-3-18-.29 Graphic Arts-Rotogravure and Flexography.

Rule 1200-3-18-.01 Purpose and General Provisions

The following changes were made to both the Tennessee and Memphis

portions of the SIP.

Paragraph (1) was revised to change the applicability of emission

standards and requirements from ``new and existing'' sources to

``certain'' sources of VOCs for which applicability is specified in

this chapter or other chapters of division 1200-3. This paragraph was

also revised to state that ``[i]n determining whether the source

category at a facility satisfies the applicability standard of a

specific rule, the potential emissions from all sources of the source

category shall be totaled.''

Paragraph (3) was added to describe the standards that limit the

pounds of VOCs per gallon of material. These standards must now specify

the allowable VOC content per gallon of material less water.

Demonstration of compliance with the VOC content standards of chapter

1200-3-18 was also addressed in paragraph (3). This paragraph states

that compliance ``other than by use of complying materials, shall be

demonstrated by the limitation of volatile organic compound emissions

to a level equivalent to the quantities which theoretically would be

emitted if complying materials would be used.''

Paragraph (4) describing methods for proof of compliance with the

standards in chapter 1200-3-18 was also added to this rule. EPA is

conditionally approving subparagraph 1200-3-18-.01(4)(b) in the Memphis

submittal because it provides for determination of the VOC content,

water content, densities, volume solids, and weight solids by

certification from the manufacturer, if supported by batch formulation

records and approved by the Technical Secretary. Based on Attachment 4

to the May 25, 1988, ``Blue Book,'' the reference to batch formulation

data must be changed to batch analytical data. In a letter dated

January 25, 1994, the State committed for Memphis to correct this

deficiency by February 1, 1995. EPA is not approving this revision for

the area of Tennessee outside of the Memphis-Shelby county area because

the State of Tennessee revised this rule in a subsequent submittal on

May 18, 1993, which will be acted on by EPA in a later notice.

Subparagraph 1200-3-18-.01(4)(c), which refers to the procedure for

the determination of capture efficiency, was withdrawn by the State via

letter dated August 26, 1992, from Mr. John W. Walton, Technical

Secretary of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board. Subparagraph

1200-3-18-.01(4)(c) was not included in the Memphis-Shelby County

submittal.

Paragraph (5) describing monitoring to confirm continuing

compliance and daily recordkeeping procedures was added. Paragraph (6)

providing for a nonrenewable exemption from the standards in chapter

1200-3-18 was also added.

Rule 1200-3-18-.02 Definitions

The definitions of ``urban county,'' ``rural county,'' and

``approved'' were deleted. The definitions of ``volatile organic

compound'' and ``coating line'' were revised to correct deficiencies.

Definitions of ``exempt solvent,'' ``operation,'' ``potential VOC

emissions,'' ``potential emissions,'' and ``legally enforceable'' were

added. A minor revision was made to the definition of ``existing

source'' to change the word ``process(es)'' to ``process.''

Rule 1200-3-18-.03 Standard for New Sources

Tennessee proposed to delete this rule in its entirety. EPA is

disapproving the deletion of this rule for the Tennessee submittal

because Tennessee does not have federally approved New Source Review

(NSR) regulations which apply to some of the sources in this chapter.

EPA is approving the deletion of this rule for the Memphis submittal

because the federally approved Tennessee NSR applies to the Memphis-

Shelby County area. Section 110(l) of the CAA provides that EPA shall

not approve a SIP revision if the revision interferes with any

applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further

progress, or any other applicable requirements of the CAA. Section

110(k) of the CAA addresses the situation in which an entire submittal,

or a separable portion of a submittal, meets all applicable

requirements of the CAA. In the case where a separable portion of the

submittal meets all of the applicable requirements, partial approval

may be used to approve that part of the submittal and disapprove the

remainder. EPA has determined that the proposed deletion of this rule

is separable from the submittal because the other revisions apply to

existing sources and this proposed revision applies only to new

sources.

Tennessee may submit the deletion of this rule with the submittal

of their revised NSR regulations. For the deletion to be approvable,

the revised NSR regulation must meet the provisions of part D of title

I of the CAA, must contain requirements that will apply to the sources

under this chapter and must be at least as stringent as the rule they

propose to delete.

Rule 1200-3-18-.04 Alternate Emission Standard

This rule was deleted in its entirety. Alternate emission standards

for VOCs were added to chapter 1200-3-21.

Rule 1200-3-18-.05 Automobile and Light Duty Truck Manufacturing

This rule was deleted in its entirety because there were no sources

subject to the rule as contained in the Tennessee SIP and the Memphis

portion of the Tennessee SIP. A new regulation for such sources

consistent with EPA guidance has been submitted by the State and EPA

will act on this submittal in a subsequent document.

Rule 1200-3-18-.06 Paper Coating

The definition of ``Paper coating'' in subparagraph (1)(b) was

revised to include ``decorative, functional, and protective coatings.''

Paragraph (2) was revised to make saturation operations subject to the

provisions of this rule.

Paragraph (3) was revised to clarify the discharge limitation for

the owner or operator of a paper coating line subject to this rule. The

limitation disallows ``the discharge into the atmosphere of any

volatile organic compound in excess of 0.35 kilograms per liter (2.9

pounds per gallon) of coating as applied (or as delivered to the

applicator), excluding water and exempt solvents, except as provided in

1200-3-18-.01(3).''

Rule 1200-3-18-.07 Petroleum Liquid Storage

The reference to rule 1200-3-18-.41 was deleted in paragraph (4)

because the rule was changed and the exemption is no longer applicable.

Rule 1200-3-18-.08 Bulk Gasoline Plants

Minor revisions were made to the exemptions in paragraph (3) for

purposes of correction and clarification.

Rule 1200-3-18-.09 Bulk Gasoline Terminals

A condition was added to the loading restrictions in paragraph (3).

This condition states that no person may load gasoline into any tank

trucks or trailers from any bulk gasoline terminal unless all loading

and vapor lines are equipped with fittings which are vapor-tight.

Paragraph (6) was added to specify the applicable test method for

determining VOC emissions from bulk gasoline terminals. This paragraph

included subparagraphs which describe the principle, method summary,

applicability, apparatus, test requirements, basic measurements

required, test procedure, calculations, and calibrations of the test

method.

Rule 1200-3-18-.10 Gasoline Service Stations Stage I

The exemptions in paragraph (3) were revised. EPA is conditionally

approving the exemption in subparagraph (3)(a) of the Memphis submittal

because it provides for director's discretion and therefore is not

approvable. The exemption specifies that gasoline dispensing facilities

equipped with control devices which have been approved by the Technical

Secretary as providing emission reductions equivalent to that provided

by floating roofs are exempt from this rule. In a letter dated January

25, 1994, the State committed for Memphis to correct this deficiency by

February 1, 1995. EPA is not approving this revision for the area of

Tennessee outside of the Memphis-Shelby county area because the State

of Tennessee revised this rule in a subsequent submittal on May 18,

1993, which will be acted on by EPA in a later document.

Subparagraph (3)(b) was revised to change the exemption from

``stationary gasoline storage containers of less than 7,570 liters

(2,000 gallons)'' to ``stationary gasoline storage containers of less

than 2,085 liters (550 gallons) capacity used exclusively in

agriculture.'' Subparagraph (3)(c) was revised to change the exemption

to facilities in counties other than Davidson and Shelby Counties.

Subparagraph (3)(d) was revised to change the exemption from ``gasoline

dispensing facilities with an annual throughput of less than 260,000

gallons which is serviced with a tank truck with a capacity of 4,200

gallons or less'' to ``gasoline dispensing facilities with an annual

throughput of less than 120,000 gallons.''

Conditions were added to the limitations on the transfer of

gasoline described in paragraph (4). These conditions specify that,

``[e]xcept as provided under paragraph (3) of this rule, no owner or

operator may transfer or cause or allow the transfer of gasoline from

any delivery vessel into any stationary storage tank as described in

subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this paragraph, unless the tank is

equipped with a submerged fill pipe and the vapors displaced from the

storage tank during filling are processed by a vapor control system in

accordance with paragraph (5) of this rule.'' Subparagraph (a)

specifies ``any stationary storage tank located at a gasoline

dispensing facility, with a capacity of 7,580 liters (2,000 gallons) or

more, which is in place before January 1, 1979.'' Subparagraph (b)

specifies ``any stationary storage tank located at a gasoline

dispensing facility, with a capacity of 948 liters (250 gallons) or

more, which is installed after December 31, 1978.'' Minor changes were

made to the phrasing in paragraph (6) to clarify the conditions on the

owner or operator of a gasoline dispensing facility regarding design,

maintenance, and refilling of a vapor-laden delivery vessel.

Rule 1200-3-18-.11 Petroleum Refinery Sources

The reference to rule 1200-3-18-.41 was deleted in paragraph (2)

because this rule was changed and is no longer applicable.

Rule 1200-3-18-.12 Can Coating

Minor revisions were made in subparagraphs (3)(a), (b), (c), and

(d) to clarify the limitations on the discharge of VOCs into the

atmosphere.

Rule 1200-3-18-.13 Coil Coating

This rule was added to chapter 1200-3-18. Paragraph (1) contains

definitions of ``Coil coating'' and ``Quench area.'' Paragraph (2)

applies the rule, in accordance with 1200-3-18-.13 (3), to the coating

applicator(s), oven(s), and quench area(s) of coil coating lines

involved in prime and top coat or single coat operations.

Paragraph (3) disallows the discharge of VOCs from a coil coating

line into the atmosphere ``in excess of 0.31 kilograms per liter (2.6

pounds per gallon) of prime and topcoat or single coat as applied (or

as delivered to the applicator), excluding water and exempt solvents,

except as provided in 1200-3-18-.01(3).'' In the Memphis submittal, EPA

is conditionally approving paragraph (3) because to meet RACT, the

emission limits must apply to any coating, not just prime and topcoat

or single coat. In a letter dated January 25, 1994, the State committed

for Memphis to correct this deficiency by February 1, 1995. EPA is not

approving this revision for the area of Tennessee outside of the

Memphis-Shelby county area because the State of Tennessee revised this

rule in a subsequent submittal on May 18, 1993, which will be acted on

by EPA in a later notice.

Rule 1200-3-18-.14 Fabric and Vinyl Coating

The definition of ``Vinyl coating'' in subparagraph (1)(b) was

revised to exempt the application of plastisol coatings. The

qualification that plastisol coatings cannot be used to bubble

emissions from vinyl printing and topcoating was also added to

subparagraph (1)(b).

The applicability provision in paragraph (2) was revised to include

saturation operations. Minor revisions were made to the phrasing in

subparagraphs (3)(a) and (b) to clarify the VOC emission limitations.

Rule 1200-3-18-.15 Metal Furniture Coating

Minor revisions were made to the phrasing in paragraph (3) to

clarify the VOC emission limitations.

Rule 1200-3-18-.16 Surface Coating of Large Appliances

A minor revision was made in paragraph (3) to correctly reference

the VOC emissions limitations in paragraph (4). Minor revisions were

made to the phrasing in paragraph (4) to clarify the VOC emission

limitations.

Rule 1200-3-18-.17 Magnet Wire Coating

Minor revisions were made to the phrasing in paragraph (2) to

clarify the VOC emission limitations.

Rule 1200-3-18-.18 Solvent Metal Cleaning

The reference to rule 1200-3-18-.41 was deleted in paragraph (2)

because this rule was changed and is no longer applicable.

Rule 1200-3-18-.20 Flat Wood Panelling Coating

Paragraphs (5) and (6), providing for increments of progress and

proof of compliance respectively, were deleted because the dates for

demonstration of compliance had expired.

Rule 1200-3-18-.21 Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and

Products

Definitions of ``High performance architectural coating'' and

``Refinishing'' were added to paragraph (1). The definition of ``High

performance architectural coating'' specifies that it is a coating

``[a]pplied at a facility located in a county which is attainment for

ozone and had a population of less that 15000 according to the 1980

census.'' An emission limitation of 0.75 kg/l (6.2 lb/gal) for high

performance architectural coating as applied (or as delivered to the

applicator), excluding water and exempt solvents, was added as

subparagraph (2)(a). The emission limitation of 0.52 kg/l (4.3 lb/gal)

for clear coating as applied was clarified and moved from subparagraph

(2)(a) to (2)(b). The emission limitation of 0.42 kg/l (3.5 lb/gal) for

air dried coating as applied was clarified and moved from subparagraph

(2)(b) to (2)(c). The emission limitation of 0.42 kg/l (3.5 lb/gal)for

extreme performance coating as applied was clarified and moved from

subparagraph (2)(c) to (2)(d). The emission limitation of 0.36 kg/l

(3.0 lb /gal) for all other coating as applied was clarified and moved

from subparagraph (2)(d) to (2)(e).

The exemptions for the exterior of marine vessels and for bicycles

in subparagraphs (5)(j) and (5)(m) were withdrawn by the State via

letter dated March 9, 1993, fromMr. John W. Walton, Technical Secretary

of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board. On August 30, 1993, the

State sent another letter to EPA withdrawing these exemptions from the

Memphis submittal. The exemption in subparagraph (5)(1) for prime and

top coating aerospace components was deleted. Paragraphs (7) and (8),

providing for increments of progress and proof of compliance

respectively, were deleted.

Rule 1200-3-18-.22 Leaks From Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor

Collection Systems

The limitation in subparagraph (2)(a) on loading and unloading

conditions for a gasoline tank truck was further specified by the

addition of the phrase ``when pressurized to gauge pressure of 4,500

pascals (18 in. of H2O).'' Paragraph (3) was amended by the

addition of the requirement that testing of gasoline tank trucks for

leak tightness be accomplished during or before the twelfth month after

the month of the last test in which compliance with the standards of

(2)(a) was demonstrated.

Paragraph (4) was revised to state that the rule is also applicable

to gasoline tank trucks which load or unload at applicable plants,

terminals, or gasoline dispensing facilities in Shelby County. The

requirement in paragraph (4) that gasoline tank trucks be equipped for

gasoline vapor collection for this rule to be applicable was deleted.

Paragraph (4) was also reorganized into subparagraphs for clarity.

Paragraph (5) requiring initial testing was deleted. The reference

to rule 1200-3-18-.42 was deleted in paragraph (6) because this rule

was changed and is no longer applicable.

Subparagraphs (6)(a) and (b) were revised to provide for EPA's

approval of equivalent test procedures for proof of compliance.

Rule 1200-3-18-.23 Petroleum Refinery Equipment Leaks

Subparagraph (2)(a) was revised so that pressure relief devices

which are connected to inaccessible valves are no longer exempt from

inclusion in the inspection program. Paragraph (4), providing for the

institution of an approved inspection program, was deleted.

Rule 1200-3-18-.25 Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof

Tanks

Paragraph (5), providing for increments of progress, was deleted.

Rule 1200-3-18-.26 Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires

Paragraphs (5) and (6), providing for increments of progress and

proof of compliance respectively, were deleted.

Rule 1200-3-18-.27 Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products

Paragraphs (4) and (5), providing for increments of progress and

proof of compliance respectively, were deleted.

Rule 1200-3-18-.28 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning

Paragraph (5), providing for increments of progress, was deleted.

Subparagraph (6)(d), providing for consistency with the test methods

and procedures in rule 1200-3-18-.43,was also deleted. The test methods

for proof of compliance are now provided for in paragraph 1200-3-18-

.01(4).

Rule 1200-3-18-.29 Graphic Arts--Rotogravure and Flexography

Subparagraph (2)(b) was revised to add the requirement that the ink

in flexographic and packaging rotogravure contain no more than 0.5

pound VOC per pound of solids. Subparagraph (2)(b) was also reorganized

into subparagraphs for clarity. Paragraphs (5) and (6), providing for

increments of progress and proof of compliance respectively, were

deleted.

Rule 1200-3-18-.30 Surface Coating of Aerospace Components

This rule was deleted in its entirety because aerospace sources are

subject to Rule 1200-3-18-.21 Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal

Parts and Products.

Rule 1200-3-18-.40 Regulations Required Only in Metropolitan Davidson

County

This rule was renamed ``Regulations Required in Nonattainment

Areas.'' Paragraph (1) was deleted and reserved for future use.

Paragraph (2) was completely revised to state that ``[a]ny plant within

a county designated in Part 1200-3-2-.01(1)(ffff)3 as nonattainment for

ozone having sources with potential volatile organic compound emissions

totaling more than 100 tons/year in the aggregate shall utilize

reasonably available control technology (RACT) for volatile organic

compound emission from those sources.'' This changes the emission

requirement for implementing RACT from 1000 tons/year or greater only

in the Metropolitan Davidson county to 100 tons/year or greater in the

entire ozone nonattainment area which makes the rule more stringent.

The State has submitted further revisions to meet the non-CTG

requirements for the Nashville area and these will be addressed in a

subsequent action by EPA. EPA is approving this revision for its

strengthening effect.

Rule 1200-3-18-.41 Compliance Schedules

This rule was deleted and replaced with the requirement that the

owner or operator of a source in existence or having a State or local

agency's construction permit before June 7, 1992, and subject to a

standard in chapter 1200-3-18 shall satisfy the applicable increments

of progress specified in subparagraphs (a), (b), and (c). This rule

also includes a certification requirement and an exemption provision.

Rule 1200-3-18-.42 Individual Compliance Schedules

Paragraph (1) was revised to state that a facility with a source

satisfying the applicability provisions of rule 1200-3-18-.41 may

petition for a specific compliance schedule differing from the

schedules contained in 1200-3-18-.41 and other rules in chapter 18 only

if one or more of the conditions specified in subparagraphs (a) and (b)

are satisfied. The condition in subparagraph (1)(c) was deleted.

Paragraph (2) was revised to delete the word ``alphabetical,''

which was a typographical error, and to require final compliance with

the specified emission standard as expeditiously as possible,

consistent with the limiting conditions specified in paragraph (1) of

this rule. Paragraph (3) was revised to state that individual

compliance schedules approved under this rule must be submitted to EPA

for approval. Paragraph (4) was revised to delete the reference to

Hamilton County.

Rule 1200-3-18-.43 General Provisions for Test Methods and Procedures

Rule 1200-3-18-.44 Determination of Volatile Content of Surface

Coatings

Rule 1200-3-18-.45 Test Methods for Determination of Volatile Organic

Compound Emissions Control Systems Efficiency

Rule 1200-3-18-.46 Test Method for Determination of Solvent Metal

Cleaning Organic Compound Emissions

Rule 1200-3-18-.47 Test Procedure for Determination of VOC Emissions

From Bulk Gasoline Terminals

The above listed rules were deleted in their entirety. The test

methods and procedures for proof of compliance are now provided for in

paragraph 1200-3-18-.01(4).

Rule 1200-3-18-.48 Capture Efficiency Test Procedures

This rule was withdrawn by the State via letter dated August 26,

1992, from Mr. John W. Walton, Technical Secretary of the Tennessee Air

Pollution Control Board. On August 30, 1993, the State sent another

letter withdrawing this rule from the Memphis submittal.

The State intends to adopt capture efficiency (CE) test procedures

after EPA publishes its revised CE test procedures. The study to

evaluate the cost and technical aspects of alternative CE methods has

been completed. EPA issued a draft document on October 6, 1993. This

document is currently undergoing review and comment. Where states have

not yet adopted CE regulations, EPA is allowing them to defer adoption

of CE test requirements while the study is underway.

Chapter 1200-3-21 General Alternate Emission Standards

Rule 1200-3-21-.01 General Alternate Emission Standard

The following changes were made to both the Tennessee and Memphis

portions of the SIP.

Paragraph (1) was revised to state that in lieu of satisfying the

standards and requirements of other chapters of division 1200-3, air

contaminant sources with a certificate of alternate control shall not

emit particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen

dioxide, or volatile organic compounds in excess of the respective

limits of said certificate.

Paragraph (2) was revised to allow sources of VOCs regulated by

other rules in the State's regulations to apply for a Certificate of

Alternate Control. Paragraph (2) was also revised to change the word

``source'' to ``source(s),'' and to change the word ``must'' to ``may''

with regard to the Technical Secretary granting a request for a

Certificate of Alternate Control. In addition, the requirement that

these standards and conditions be submitted to EPA for approval was

included in paragraph (3).

The condition in subparagraph (2)(a) was revised to include VOCs

and to replace the language regarding determination of equivalent

emissions. Subparagraph (2)(b) was revised to state that if a schedule

of compliance is required, it must be included as a condition on the

certificate. The phrase ``this date'' was changed to ``the final

compliance date.''

Subparagraph (2)(c) was revised to require the air contaminant

source to use modeling consistent with Guideline on Air Quality Models

(Revised), EPA-450/2-78-027R, with the 1988 revisions, to verify that

the alternate emission standard will yield equivalent or improved air

quality for the pollutant involved. Minor revisions were also made in

subparagraph (2)(c) to correct typographical errors.

Subparagraph (2)(d) was revised to correct the reference to another

rule and to replace the word ``old'' with ``existing'' in reference to

sources. Subparagraph (2)(d) was also revised to require compliance

with all applicable standards and requirements established under

paragraph 1200-3-9-.01(4), under chapters 1200-3-11 and 16, and

according to a lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) determination

under paragraph 1200-3-9-.01(5). These standards and requirements will

not be superseded or replaced by the alternate emission standard.

Subparagraph (2)(e), providing that sources must establish a

specific emission limit for each emission point, was deleted.

Subparagraph (2)(f) was renamed (2)(e) and revised to increase the

certificate fee for each source.

Subparagraph (2)(g) was renamed (2)(f) and a phrase was deleted for

clarification. A new subparagraph, (2)(g) was added to state that the

provisions of the Emissions Trading Policy Statement, 51 FR 43850,

dated December 4, 1986, are being satisfied. This policy statement is

more stringent than subparagraph (2)(e) which was deleted.

Paragraph (3) was revised so that alternate emission standards and

certificate conditions are no longer considered to be an addition to

the existing standards. In addition, the requirement that these

standards and conditions be submitted to EPA for approval was included

in paragraph (3).

Paragraph (4) was revised to state that ``[g]ood engineering

practice stack heights shall be utilized on all stack changes

associated with the alternate control standards for particulate matter,

sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide.'' Paragraph (9)

was revised to delete the reference to each emission point.

Rule 1200-3-21-.02 Applicability

This rule was added to make chapter 1200-3-21 applicable ``only to

those air contaminant sources which apply for a certificate of

alternate control or a revision to a certificate of alternate control

after March 18, 1993.''

Final Action

EPA is fully approving the submitted revisions to the Tennessee

State Implementation Plan (SIP) and the Memphis portion of the

Tennessee SIP with the exception of the proposed revisions to Rules

1200-3-18-.01 (subparagraph (4)(b)), 1200-3-18-.10 (subparagraph

(3)(a), and 1200-3-18-13 (paragraph (3)) of the Memphis portion of the

Tennessee SIP for which we are issuing a conditional approval and Rule

1200-3-18-.03 Standard for New Sources of the Tennessee SIP for which

we are disapproving the proposed deletion.

In addition, EPA is not approving the proposed revisions to rules

1200-3-18-.01 (subparagraph (4)(b)), 1200-3-18-.10 (subparagraph

(3)(a)), and 1200-3-18-13 (paragraph (3)) of the Tennessee SIP. These

rules were revised in a subsequent submittal by Tennessee on May 18,

1993. Therefore, since these revisions are not approvable as submitted

in this action, EPA will act on these rules in the action on the May

18, 1993, submittal.

Because Tennessee has made a commitment for the Memphis

nonattainment area that EPA believes meets the requirements necessary

for EPA to grant conditional approval, EPA is conditionally approving

under section 110(k)(4) of the CAA. In order for EPA to take final

action on the commitment, the State must meet their commitment for the

Memphis nonattainment area to adopt the identified provisions by

February 1, 1995, and submit them to EPA within the time specified in

this schedule. If the State fails to adopt or submit these rules for

Memphis-Shelby County to EPA within this time frame, this approval will

become a disapproval on that date. EPA will notify the area by letter

that this action has occurred. At that time, this commitment will no

longer be a part of the approved Memphis-Shelby County portion of the

Tennessee SIP. EPA subsequently will publish a notice in the notice

section of the Federal Register. If Tennessee adopts and submits these

rules for Memphis-Shelby County to EPA within the applicable time

frame, the conditionally approved submission will remain a part of the

SIP until EPA takes final action approving or disapproving the new

submittal. If EPA disapproves the new submittal, the conditionally

approved submittal will also be removed from the SIP. Moreover, the

rules on which the conditional approval was based will also be

disapproved at that time. If EPA approves the submittal, those newly

approved rules will become a part of the SIP and will modify or replace

the commitment and the rules on which the conditional approval is

based.

If EPA determines that it cannot issue a final, conditional

approval or if the conditional approval is converted to a disapproval,

the sanctions clock under section 179(a) will begin. This clock will

begin at the time EPA issues the final disapproval or on the date

Tennessee fails to meet its commitment. In the latter case, EPA will

notify the area by letter that the conditional approval has been

converted to a disapproval and that the sanctions clock has begun. If

the State does not submit and EPA does not approve the rule on which

the disapproval was based within 18 months of the disapproval, EPA must

impose one of the sanctions under section 179(b)--highway funding

restrictions or the offset sanction. In addition, the final disapproval

triggers the Federal implementation plan (FIP) requirement under

section 110(c).

This action is being taken without prior proposal because the

changes are noncontroversial and EPA anticipates no significant

comments on them. The public should be advised that this action will be

effective June 17, 1994. However, if notice is received by May 18, 1994

that someone wished to submit adverse or critical comments, this action

will be withdrawn and two subsequent documents will be published before

the effective date. One document will withdraw the final action and

another will begin a new rulemaking by announcing a proposal of the

action and establishing a comment period.

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7607 (b)(1),

petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the

United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 17,

1994. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of

this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for purposes

of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition

for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the

effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged

later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (see section

307(b)(2) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7607 (b)(2)).

This action has been classified as a Table 2 action by the Regional

Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal Register on

January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by an October 26, 1993,

memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant Administrator for

Air and Radiation. A future document will inform the general public of

these tables. On January 6, 1989, the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) waived Table 2 and 3 SIP revisions (54 FR 2222) from the

requirements of section 3 of Executive Order 12291 for two years. The

EPA has submitted a request for a permanent waiver for Table 2 and

Table 3 SIP revisions. The OMB has agreed to continue the waiver until

such time as it rules on EPA's request. This request continues in

effect under Executive Order 12866 which superseded Executive Order

12291 on September 30, 1993.

Nothing in this action shall be construed as permitting or allowing

or establishing a precedent for any future request for a revision to

any SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be considered

separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental

factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory

requirements.

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA

must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of

any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.

Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a

significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small

entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,

and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than

50,000.

SIP approvals and conditional approvals under section 110 and

subchapter I, part D of the CAA do not create any new requirements, but

simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing.

Therefore, because the Federal SIP-approval does not impose any new

requirements, EPA certifies that it does not have a significant impact

on any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the

Federal-state relationship under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory

flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of State action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions

concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427

U.S. 246, 256-66 (S. Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,

Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations,

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.

Dated: March 22, 1994.

Patrick M. Tobin,

Acting Regional Administrator.

Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, is

amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part ]52 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Subpart RR--Tennessee

2. Section 52.2219 is added to subpart RR to read as follows:

Sec. 52.2219 Identification of plan--conditional approval.

EPA is conditionally approving the following revisions to the

Memphis-Shelby County portion of the Tennessee SIP contingent on

Memphis meeting the schedule which was committed to for Memphis by

Tennessee in a letter dated December 20, 1993, and amended on January

25, 1994, from the State of Tennessee to EPA Region IV.

(a) Rule 1200-3-18-.01 Purpose and General Provisions: Subparagraph

(4)(b) effective October 23, 1993.

(b) Rule 1200-3-18-.10 Gasoline Service Stations Stage I:

Subparagraph (3)(a) effective October 23, 1993.

(c) Rule 1200-3-18-.13 Coil Coating: Paragraph (3) effective

October 23, 1993.

3. Section 52.2220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(115) to read

as follows:

Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(115) Revisions to the rules in the State's portion of the

Tennessee State Implementation Plan (SIP) regarding control of volatile

organic compounds (VOCs) were submitted on June 25, 1992, and March 22,

1993, by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation.

Revisions to the rules in the Memphis-Shelby County portion of the

Tennessee SIP regarding control of VOCs were submitted on November 5,

1992, and April 22, 1993, by the State on behalf of Memphis-Shelby

County. In these submittals, Memphis-Shelby County adopted State

regulations by reference.

(i) Incorporation by reference.

(A) Revisions to the following State of Tennessee regulations were

effective on June 7, 1992.

(1) Rule 1200-3-2-.01 General Definitions: Subparagraphs (1)(b),

(c), (z), (aa), (gg), (vv), (zz), (ccc), (lll), (mmm), (nnn), (eeee),

(ffff), (gggg), and (iiii).

(2) Rule 1200-3-18-.01 Purposes and General Provisions: Paragraphs

(1), (3), (4) introductory paragraph and (4)(a), (5), and (6).

(3) Rule 1200-3-18-.02 Definitions: Subparagraphs (1)(a), (b), (c),

(f), (m), (ii), and (jj).

(4) Rule 1200-3-18-.04 Alternate Emission Standard.

(5) Rule 1200-3-18-.05 Automobile and Light Duty Truck

Manufacturing.

(6) Rule 1200-3-18-.06 Paper Coating: Subparagraph (1)(b) and

paragraphs (2), (3), and (4).

(7) Rule 1200-3-18-.07 Petroleum Liquid Storage: Introductory

paragraph of paragraph (4).

(8) Rule 1200-3-18-.08 Bulk Gasoline Plants: Paragraphs (2) and

(3).

(9) Rule 1200-3-18-.09 Bulk Gasoline Plants: Paragraph (2),

subparagraph (3)(d), and paragraph (6).

(10) Rule 1200-3-18-.10 Gasoline Service Stations Stage I:

Paragraphs (2), (3) (except subparagraph (3)(a)), (4), and (6).

(11) Rule 1200-3-18-.11 Petroleum Refinery Sources: Paragraph (2).

(12) Rule 1200-3-18-.12 Can Coating: Paragraphs (3) and (4).

(13) Rule 1200-3-18-.13 Coil Coating: Paragraphs (1), (2), and (4).

(14) Rule 1200-3-18-.14 Fabric and Vinyl Coating: Subparagraph

(1)(b) and paragraphs (2), (3), and (4).

(15) Rule 1200-3-18-.15 Metal Furniture Coating: Paragraphs (3) and

(4).

(16) Rule 1200-3-18-.16 Surface Coating of Large Appliances:

Paragraphs (3), (4), and (5).

(17) Rule 1200-3-18-.17 Magnet Wire Coating: Paragraphs (2) and

(3).

(18) Rule 1200-3-18-.18 Solvent Metal Cleaning: Paragraphs (2) and

(3).

(19) Rule 1200-3-18-.20 Flat Wood Paneling Coating: Introductory

paragraph of paragraph (2), paragraphs (4), (5), and (6).

(20) Rule 1200-3-18-.21 Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal

Parts and Products: Subparagraphs (1)(g) and (h), paragraph (2),

subparagraph (5)(1), and paragraphs (6), (7), and (8).

(21) Rule 1200-3-18-.22 Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor

Collection Systems: Introductory paragraph of paragraph (2),

subparagraph (2)(a), paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6).

(22) Rule 1200-3-18-.23 Petroleum Refinery Equipment Leaks:

Introductory paragraph of paragraph (2), subparagraph (2)(a), and

paragraph (4).

(23) Rule 1200-3-18-.25 Petroleum Liquid Storage in External

Floating Roof Tanks: Introductory paragraph of paragraph (2), and

paragraph (5).

(24) Rule 1200-3-18-.26 Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires:

Introductory paragraph of paragraph (2), paragraphs (4), (5), and (6).

(25) Rule 1200-3-18-.27 Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical

Products: Introductory paragraph of paragraph (2), paragraphs (3), (4),

and (5).

(26) Rule 1200-3-18-.28 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning:

Introductory paragraph of paragraph (2), paragraphs (4) and (5), and

subparagraph (6)(d).

(27) Rule 1200-3-18-.29 Graphic Arts-Rotogravure and Flexography:

Introductory paragraph of paragraph (2), subparagraph (2)(b),

paragraphs (5) and (6).

(28) Rule 1200-3-18-.30 Surface Coating of Aerospace Components.

(29) Rule 1200-3-18-.40 Regulations Required in Nonattainment

Areas.

(30) Rule 1200-3-18-.41 Compliance Schedules.

(31) Rule 1200-3-18-.42 Individual Compliance Schedules: Paragraphs

(1), (2), (3), and (4).

(32) Rule 1200-3-18-.43 General Provisions for Test Methods and

Procedures.

(33) Rule 1200-3-18-.44 Determination of Volatile Content of

Surface Coatings.

(34) Rule 1200-3-18-.45 Test Method for Determination of Volatile

Organic Compound Emissions Control Systems Efficiency.

(35) Rule 1200-3-18-.46 Test Method for Determination of Solvent

Metal Cleaning Organic Compound Emissions.

(36) Rule 1200-3-18-.47 Test Procedure for Determination of VOC

Emissions from Bulk Gasoline Terminals.

(B) Revisions to the following State of Tennessee regulations were

effective on March 18, 1993.

(1) Rule 1200-3-21-.01 General Alternate Emission Standard:

Paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (9).

(2) Rule 1200-3-21-.02 Applicability.

(ii) Additional material--none.

4. Section 52.2225 is amended by redesignating paragraph (b) as

paragraph (c) and adding a new paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec. 52.2225 VOC rule deficiency correction.

* * * * *

(b) Revisions to sections 1200-3-2 ``Definitions'', 1200-3-18

``Volatile Organic Compounds'' and 1200-3-21 ``General Alternate

Emission Standards'' of the Tennessee SIP and the Memphis portion of

the Tennessee SIP were submitted to correct deficiencies pursuant to

the SIP call letter for ozone from Greer Tidwell, the EPA Regional

Administrator, to Governor McWherter on May 26, 1988, and clarified in

a letter dated June 10, 1988, from Winston Smith, Air, Pesticides &

Toxics Management Division Director, to Harold Hodges, Director of the

Tennessee Division of Air Pollution. These revisions are approved with

the exception of the following which remain as deficiencies and must be

corrected by Tennessee and Memphis and the deletion of section 1200-3-

18-.03 ``Standard for New Sources'' in the Tennessee SIP which was

disapproved. The deficiencies are common to both Tennessee and Memphis

because Memphis adopts the Tennessee regulations by reference.

(1) Rule 1200-3-18-.01 subparagraph (4)(b) must be changed to

provide for EPA Administrator approval and the reference to batch

formulation data must be changed to batch analytical data.

(2) Rule 1200-3-18-.10 subparagraph (3)(a) must be changed to

provide for EPA Administrator approval.

(3) Rule 1200-3-18-.13 paragraph (3) must be changed to apply to

any coating, not just prime and topcoat or single coat for this rule to

meet the RACT emission limits.

* * * * *

5. Section 52.2228 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to read as

follows:

Sec. 52.2228 Review of new sources and modifications.

* * * * *

(e) The State of Tennessee proposed to delete section 1200-3-18-.03

``Standard for New Sources'' from the Tennessee State Implementation

Plan (SIP) and the Memphis-Shelby County portion of the Tennessee SIP.

EPA is disapproving the deletion of this rule for the Tennessee SIP

because Tennessee does not have federally approved New Source Review

(NSR) regulations which apply to some of the sources in this chapter.

EPA is approving the deletion of this rule for the Memphis submittal

because the federally approved TN NSR applies to the Memphis-Shelby

County area.

[FR Doc. 94-8969 Filed 4-15-94; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-F