Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings From Thailand; Determination Not To Revoke Countervailing Duty Order
Federal RegisterApr 6, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[C-549-803]
Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings From Thailand; Determination Not To
Revoke Countervailing Duty Order
AGENCY: International Trade Administration/Import Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of determination not to revoke countervailing duty
order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is notifying the public of its
determination not to revoke the countervailing duty order on malleable
iron pipe fittings from Thailand.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 1994.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Albright, Office of
Countervailing Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)482-2786.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 1, 1994, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register (59 FR 4692) its intent to revoke the
countervailing duty order on malleable iron pipe fittings from Thailand
(54 FR 6439; February 10, 1989). Under 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii), the
Secretary of Commerce will conclude that an order is no longer of
interest to interested parties and will revoke the order if no domestic
interested party objects to revocation or no interested party requests
an administrative review by the last day of the fifth anniversary
month.
On February 28, 1994, the Cast Iron Pipe Fitting Committee,
petitioners in the original investigation, objected to our intent to
revoke the order. Because the requirements of 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii)
have not been met, we will not revoke the order.
This determination is in accordance with 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4).
Dated: March 22, 1994.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 94-8257 Filed 4-5-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.