Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; New Jersey Emission Statement Program
Federal RegisterApr 4, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[Region II Docket No. 125, NJ-14-1-6160; FRL-4857-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; New Jersey
Emission Statement Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of New Jersey on February 19, 1993 for the purpose of
implementing an Emission Statement Program for stationary sources in
New Jersey. The SIP was submitted by New Jersey to satisfy the Clean
Air Act requirements for stationary sources to report annually to the
State on their emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and
oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and for the State to make this data
available to EPA and the public.
DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received on or before
May 4, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to:
William J. Muszynski, P.E., Acting Regional Administrator,
Environmental Protection Agency, Region II Office, 26 Federal Plaza,
New York, New York 10278.
Copies of the State's submittal are available for inspection during
normal business hours at the following locations:
Environmental Protection Agency, Region II Library, 26 Federal
Plaza, room 402, New York, New York 10278.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy,
Office of Air Quality Management, Bureau of Air Quality Planning, 401
East State Street, CN418, Trenton, New Jersey 08625.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William S. Baker, Chief, Air Programs
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 26 Federal Plaza, room 1034A,
New York, New York 10278, (212) 264-2517.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The air quality planning and SIP requirements for ozone
nonattainment and transport areas are established in subparts I and II
of part D of title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (the
Act). EPA has published a ``General Preamble'' and ``Appendices to the
General Preamble'' (see 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992), and 57 FR 18070
(April 28, 1992)) describing how EPA intends to review SIPs submitted
under title I of the Act.
EPA has also issued a draft guidance document entitled, ``Guidance
on the Implementation of an Emission Statement Program'' (July 1992),
describing the requirements for the Emission Statement Program
discussed in this rulemaking. The EPA is also conducting a rulemaking
process to modify 40 CFR part 52 to reflect the requirements of the
Emission Statement Program.
Section 182(a) establishes requirements for stationary sources to
prepare and submit to the state each year emission statements showing
actual emissions of VOCs and NOx. Further, states with ozone
nonattainment areas are required to submit a revision to their SIPs by
November 15, 1992 establishing this Emission Statement Program.
Facilities are required to submit their first emission statement to
a state within three years of promulgation of the Act and annually
thereafter.
If either VOC or NOx is emitted at or above the minimum
reporting level that is established in a state Emission Statement
Program, the other pollutant (NOx or VOC) from the same facility
should be included in the emission statement, even if the pollutant is
emitted at levels below the minimum reporting level.
Section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act allows states to waive, with
EPA approval, the requirement for an emission statement for classes or
categories of sources with less than 25 tons per year of actual plant-
wide NOx and VOC emissions in nonattainment areas if the class or
category is included in the base year and periodic inventories and
emissions are calculated using emission factors established by EPA
(such as those found in EPA publication AP-42) or other methods
acceptable to EPA.
New Jersey's Submittal
On November 15, 1992, New Jersey submitted a SIP revision for ozone
which included a proposed Emission Statement Regulation. On February
19, 1993, New Jersey submitted a SIP revision containing the adopted
regulation, Subchapter 21, ``Emission Statements'' of Chapter 27, Title
7 of the New Jersey Administrative Code, effective April 20, 1993.
Subsequent to the February 19 submittal, a problem was identified with
New Jersey's enabling legislation. The enabling legislation, which did
not support the proposed regulation regarding confidentiality
provisions, was modified to conform to EPA's policy which does not
allow confidentiality of emissions data submitted as part of the
Emission Statement Program. This modified legislation was signed on
August 13, 1993 by the Governor of New Jersey. EPA has determined that
New Jersey now has the necessary authority to promulgate an Emission
Statement Regulation.
On May 24, 1993, New Jersey submitted a letter justifying the
exemption of gasoline dispensing facilities from the Emission Statement
Program, since none of the sources in this category exceeded the
applicable threshold. New Jersey has included emissions from these
exempted sources in the base year inventory and will continue to report
them in subsequent inventories. Further, on February 3, 1994, New
Jersey submitted a letter requesting a waiver from the Emission
Statement Program of all sources emitting below the applicable
threshold.
EPA's Findings
EPA has determined that an acceptable Emission Statement Program
must have several components. Specifically, a state must submit it as a
revision to its SIP, and the Emission Statement Program must meet the
minimum requirements for reporting as outlined in EPA's, ``Guidance on
the Implementation of an Emission Statement Program'' (July 1992). The
program must include, at a minimum, provisions for source
applicability, definitions, compliance, and specific source reporting
requirements.
EPA has concluded that the New Jersey program meets these
requirements. EPA's detailed review of New Jersey's Emission Statement
Program is contained in a technical support document available from the
source for further information identified at the beginning of this
document.
Applicability
In ozone nonattainment areas, facilities which emit VOC or NOx
in amounts of 25 tons per year or more must submit an emission
statement. The entire State of New Jersey is designated nonattainment
of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. New Jersey's
regulation appropriately requires facilities anywhere in the State
actually emitting or having the potential to emit ten tons per year or
more of VOC or 25 tons per year or more of NOx to submit an annual
emission statement.
In accordance with the provision to waive reporting requirements,
New Jersey has requested a waiver from the Emission Statement Program
for sources emitting less than ten tons per year of plant-wide VOC and
less than 25 tons per year of plant-wide NOx. New Jersey has
included these sources of emissions (calculated using emission factors
established or approved by EPA) in the base year inventory and will
continue to do so in the periodic inventories. EPA has determined that
New Jersey has complied with the emission statement waiver provisions
outlined in EPA guidance. New Jersey has addressed the emission
statement applicability provisions in a manner that is acceptable to
EPA.
Definitions
The key definitions that New Jersey included in its Emission
Statement Regulation are consistent with the EPA guidance.
Compliance
All measures and other elements in the SIP must be enforceable by
the State and EPA. The EPA criteria addressing the enforceability of
SIPs and SIP revisions were stated in a September 23, 1987 memorandum
(with attachments) from J. Craig Potter, Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation (see 57 FR 13541). SIP provisions must also contain a
program that provides for enforcement of the control measures and other
elements in the SIP (see section 110(a)(2)(C)).
The State of New Jersey has a program in its SIP that will ensure
that the requirements of section 182(a)(3)(B) are adequately enforced.
New Jersey will continue to provide EPA with status reports which
outline the degree of compliance of sources and which indicate the
sources that have and have not met the provisions of the Emission
Statement Program. In addition, New Jersey has established penalty
amounts to be assessed for each reporting violation.
In letters dated June 24 and October 8, 1993, New Jersey provided
EPA with quarterly Emission Statement Status Reports. These reports
showed the total number of facilities from which emission data was
requested, the number of facilities that met, and that failed to meet
the provisions. Also in these reports, New Jersey provided a listing of
the facilities that did not comply with the emission statement
reporting requirements. New Jersey has included, as part of its
February 19, 1993 submittal, compliance schedules with appropriate
penalties for sources failing to comply. EPA has determined that New
Jersey has an adequate enforcement program in place to satisfy the
compliance requirements of an Emission Statement Program.
Reporting Requirements
In accordance with EPA requirements, New Jersey has required the
necessary source-supplied data elements from facilities. The survey
forms that New Jersey has provided to facilities for use in reporting
emission statement data are not EPA forms but require the necessary
data.
New Jersey submitted a letter on May 24, 1993 committing to meet
EPA's requirements on reporting by verifying facility-supplied data and
by submitting required data to EPA. New Jersey will submit facility and
state-supplied data to the Aerometric Information Retrieval System
(AIRS) on an annual basis.
Summary
EPA is proposing to approve this portion of the SIP submittal as
meeting the specific requirements for an Emission Statement Program.
Nothing in this proposed rule should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be
considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and
environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit
enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations
of less than 50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act
do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements
that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP-
approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify that it does
not have a significant impact on small entities. Moreover, due to the
nature of the Federal-state relationship under the Act, preparation of
a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into
the economic reasonableness of state action. The Act forbids EPA to
base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds.Union Electric Co.T1
v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410
(a)(2).
This proposed rule has been classified as a Table 2 action by the
Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal
Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by an
October 4, 1993 memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant
Administrator for Air and Radiation. A future document will inform the
general public of these tables. On January 6, 1989, the Office of
Management and Budget waived Table 2 and 3 SIP revisions (54 FR 2222)
from the requirements of section 3 of Executive Order 12291 for a
period of two years. The EPA has submitted a request for a permanent
waiver for Table 2 and 3 SIP revisions. The OMB has agreed to continue
the wavier until such time as it rules on EPA's request. This request
continues in effect under Executive Order 12866 which superseded
Executive Order 12291 on September 30, 1993.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C 7401-7671q.
Dated: March 18, 1994.
William J. Muszynski, P.E.,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-7989 Filed 4-1-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.