Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Wisconsin
Federal RegisterJan 4, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[W12-2-5550; FRL-4821-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Wisconsin
AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: USEPA is proposing to disapprove the State of Wisconsin's
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Rules, Natural Resources
(NR) 405.01 through 405.17, as a revision to the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The State developed the rules as Wisconsin's
plan to prevent significant deterioration of air quality in areas
designated as unclassifiable or attainment of the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) and to satisfy the requirements of part C of
the Clean Air Act (Act). USEPA proposes to disapprove these rules
because they do not meet USEPA's regulation governing State PSD
programs (40 CFR 51.166). Until USEPA approves a SIP submission from
Wisconsin satisfying these requirements, the Federal PSD requirements
at 40 CFR 52.21 remain applicable within the State of Wisconsin.
DATES: Comments on this revision and on the proposed USEPA action must
be received by March 7, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Carlton Nash, Chief,
Regulation Development Section, Air Toxics and Radiation Branch (AT-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Please submit an original and five
(5) copies, if possible.
Copies of the SIP revision request and USEPA's analysis are
available at the following address for review: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air Toxics and Radiation Branch (AT-18J),
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. It is recommended
that you telephone Constantine Blathras at (312) 886-0671, before
visiting the Region 5 Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constantine Blathras, Grants
Management and Program Evaluation Section, Air Toxics and Radiation
Branch (AT-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-0671.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The 1977 Amendments to the Clean Air Act added part C to title I,
which required implementation of a PSD program. On June 19, 1978 USEPA
promulgated a PSD program to meet the requirements of part C. It
promulgated 40 CFR 51.24 (now 40 CFR 51.166), which listed the
requirements a State must meet in order to have a State PSD program
approved as a part of its SIP. It promulgated 40 CFR 52.21, which
contains the procedures and requirements which USEPA follows when it
carries out the mandates of part C itself. These Sec. 52.21
requirements were then promulgated into those State SIPs where a State
did not have an approvable plan in place. Section 52.21 provides that
its requirements and authorities, or parts thereof, can be delegated to
the State and local air programs if USEPA determines they have the
ability and authority to carry out its mandates.
On June 19, 1978 (43 FR 26410), USEPA promulgated the Federal PSD
program, 40 CFR 52.21(b) through (v), into the Wisconsin SIP at 40 CFR
52.2581 because Wisconsin had not submitted an approvable PSD program.
On August 19, 1980 USEPA gave Wisconsin partial delegation to run the
Federal PSD Program and on November 13, 1987 gave Wisconsin full
delegation of the program.
Seeking a SIP approval of the State's PSD Program, the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) submitted its PSD rules, NR
405.01 through NR 405.17, to USEPA as a revision to its SIP on March
16, 1987. A further revision to these rules, which addresses oxides of
nitrogen (NOx), was submitted on November 24, 1992.
Wisconsin NR 405 deals exclusively with PSD permitting
requirements.\1\ USEPA evaluated NR 405 by comparing each section of
the rule to the appropriate paragraph of 40 CFR 51.166 (formerly 40 CFR
51.24). Although Wisconsin's PSD rules essentially incorporated the
Federal PSD provisions in 40 CFR 51.166, USEPA's evaluation revealed
deficiencies relative to references to New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS), National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP), federally issued PSD permits, source-specific allowable
emissions, and modeling guidelines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Chapter NR 405 applies the PSD regulation within the total
area of the State of Wisconsin. Court decisions have determined that
State governments do not have jurisdiction over most Indian lands.
This in itself does not affect USEPA's proposal to disapprove the
rule, but would have to be addressed by Wisconsin if it submitted a
revised rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. USEPA's Evaluation of the Proposed Revision
A. NSPS and NESHAP
The Federal PSD definitions at 40 CFR 51.166 pertaining to: (1)
``Best Available Control Technology'' (BACT), (2) ``Allowable
emissions'', (3) ``Federally enforceable'', and (4) the control
technology review requirements make reference to applicable standards
and standards of performance under 40 CFR part 60 (NSPS) and 40 CFR
part 61 (NESHAP), respectively. In the comparable provisions of the
State rule, the State refers to other NR 400 series chapters, i.e., NR
440, 445 to 499, and 400 to 499 of the State code. Although the State
may have intended that these chapters approximate the requirements of
40 CFR parts 60 and 61, Wisconsin's NSPS and NESHAP regulations are not
federally enforceable and may, in certain circumstances, differ
significantly from the parts 60 and 61 requirements in the Federal PSD
requirements. The references to parts 60 and 61 in the Federal PSD
requirements for BACT and control technology review
(Secs. 51.166(b)(12) and 51.166(j)(1), respectively) set minimum
emissions requirements. Because the State can set less stringent NSPS
and NESHAP emission limits than the Federal standards, or not set any
limits at all, the State PSD provisions which are dependent upon the
requirements of Chapter 440 and Chapters 445 to 449 are not approvable.
B. Stack Height
The provisions in 40 CFR part 51, subpart I--``Revision of New
Sources and Modifications'' set forth both general and specific
requirements for permitting PSD sources, including definitions. In
order for the State to implement the stack height provision in
accordance with 40 CFR 51.164 and 51.166(h), it must have definitions
of such terms as ``stack'', ``dispersion technique'', and ``good
engineering practice''. On November 6, 1985, the State submitted a
letter stating that permits issued for new or modified sources will
conform with the requirements with the Stack Height Regulation, as set
forth in the Federal Register on July 8, 1985, until such time that the
State promulgates its own rule. As submitted, this provision meets the
stack height requirements of the PSD program, and USEPA approved
Wisconsin's commitment on August 4, 1989 (54 FR 32074), as a portion of
Wisconsin's stack height plan.
C. Federally Issued PSD Permits
In the State's definition of ``major modifications'', NR
405.02(21)(b)(6), the rule exempts an increase in hours of operation or
in production rates from review unless such increases are prohibited by
permits issued after January 6, 1975, under NR 405. This rule is
deficient for not requiring review of sources with such increases if
the increases were prohibited by previously issued Federal permits or
during the period when EPA issued the permits prior to the delegation
of the program's authority. The State rule only exempts from the
exclusion those permits with conditions ``pursuant to this chapter'',
which is in the Wisconsin rule. There is no requirement for review of
modifications to federally issued permits with exemptions pursuant to
40 CFR 52.21. As submitted, this provision is not approvable as a PSD
rule.
D. Source-Specific Allowable Emissions
NR 405.02(1) contains the term ``source-specific allowable
emissions''. The meaning of the term is unclear. The Federal rule
depends upon the preamble language published in the Federal Register on
August 7, 1980 (Vol. 45, No. 154), to qualify the term to exclude cases
where data on actual emissions are available. The language in NR
405.02(1) would have to be clarified so that the State term has the
same meaning as the Federal term. This provision is not approvable in
its present form.
E. PSD Increments
The State PSD increments for sulfur dioxide and particulate matter
are found in Chapter NR 404.05. The increments were not included in
Wisconsin's March 16, 1987 PSD SIP submittal, but were included in its
November 24, 1992 submittal.
F. Modeling Guidelines
The modeling guidelines referenced in NR 405.10 are now outmoded,
although they were current at the time of submittal. To make NR 405.10
approvable, it would either have to reference the most recent
guidelines (See 40 CFR 165(l)) or state that the applicant must use
USEPA's most current applicable guideline models. Although the modeling
guidelines were current at the time of submittal, this deficiency would
need to be addressed if Wisconsin were to resubmit the rule as a SIP
revision.
G. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Increments
On October 17, 1988 (53 FR 40656), USEPA promulgated PSD air
quality increments for NO2. The States were required to submit to
USEPA by July 17, 1990, plan revisions to protect the NO2
increments. Wisconsin submitted such increments to USEPA on November
24, 1992. This submittal meets the NOX increment requirements and
is approvable.
H. Particulate Matter (PM) Significant Level
On July 1, 1987 (52 FR 24713), USEPA promulgated the significant
level for PM at 15 tons per year. Wisconsin submitted two PM SIP
revisions on March 13, 1989 and May 10, 1990 to meet the Federal PM
requirements. These submittals were proposed for approval on March 13,
1989 (NR 400.02, 404.02, 405.02, 406.04, 484.03) which contain the PM
significant level, and May 10, 1990 (NR 404.04, 484.03). USEPA then
proposed to disapprove the package on December 23, 1992. After
receiving comments from the State, USEPA moved to approve the package.
The final rulemaking approving these rules was published on June 28,
1993 (58 FR 34528).
Proposed Action
Because of the deficiencies noted above, USEPA is proposing to
disapprove Wisconsin's Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit
Program as not meeting the requirements of part C of the Clean Air Act.
The Agency reviewed this PSD SIP revision request for conformance
with the provisions of the 1990 Amendments enacted on November 15,
1990. The Agency has determined that this action did not conform with
the statute before it was amended, that the Amendments did not in any
way affect this determination, and that the revision does not conform
to the Act, as amended. If resubmitted, Wisconsin's PSD SIP submission
should include all requirements and changes added by the 1990
Amendments. Thus, USEPA is proposing that the revision be disapproved.
Pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C., section 605(b), I certify
that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities (see 46 FR 8709). If USEPA were to
disapprove this rule, its disapproval would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because
USEPA's PSD program remains in effect under delegated authority.
Sources would remain subject to the same requirements.
Under Executive Order 12291, this action is not ``Major''. It has
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Dated: November 15, 1993.
Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-75 Filed 1-3-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.