Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Louisiana Stage II Program
Federal RegisterMar 25, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[LA-9-1-5734; FRL-4840-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Louisiana
Stage II Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is taking action to approve the Louisiana Stage II
State Implementation Plan (SIP), which includes a SIP Supplement dated
November 15, 1992, and State regulations (title 33, chapter 21. Control
of Emission of Organic Compounds, section 2132. Stage II Vapor Recovery
Systems for Control of Vehicle Refueling Emissions at Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities, and section 6523. Fee Schedule Listing), as a
revision to the Louisiana SIP for ozone. On November 10, 1992,
Louisiana submitted a SIP revision request to the EPA to satisfy the
requirement of section 182(b)(3) of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA)
of 1990. This SIP revision requires owners and operators of gasoline
dispensing facilities to install and operate Stage II vapor recovery
equipment in the Louisiana ozone nonattainment areas classified as
moderate or worse. This revision applies to the Louisiana parishes of
Ascension, East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, Iberville, Livingston,
and Pointe Coupee.
DATES: This final rule will be effective May 24, 1994, unless notice is
received by April 25, 1994, that adverse or critical comments will be
submitted. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be
published in the Federal Register (FR).
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to James F. Davis at USEPA, Region 6
(6T-AP), 1445 Ross Avenue, suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The
State submittal and the technical support document (TSD) are available
for public review at the above address and at the Louisiana Department
of Environmental Quality, H.B. Garlock Building, 7290 Bluebonnet, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana 70810. Interested persons wanting to examine these
documents should make an appointment with the appropriate office at
least 24 hours before the visiting day.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James F. Davis at (214) 655-7584. A
copy of today's revision to the Louisiana SIP is also available for
inspection at: Air Docket 6102, US Environmental Protection Agency, 401
M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 182(b)(3) of the CAAA, the EPA
was required to issue guidance as to the effectiveness of Stage II
systems. The EPA issued technical guidance in November 1991 and
enforcement guidance in December 1991 to meet this requirement.1
In addition, on April 16, 1992, the EPA published the ``General
Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990'' (General Preamble) (57 FR 13498). The guidance
documents and the General Preamble interpret the Stage II statutory
requirement and indicate what the EPA believes a State submittal needs
to include to meet that requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\These two documents are entitled ``Technical Guidance--Stage
II Vapor Recovery Systems for Control of Vehicle Refueling Emissions
at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities'' (EPA-450/3-91-022) and
``Enforcement Guidance for Stage II Vehicle Refueling Control
Programs.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA has designated the Baton Rouge and Lake Charles areas as
ozone nonattainment in the State of Louisiana. The Baton Rouge
nonattainment area is classified as serious and contains the following
six parishes: Ascension, East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, Iberville,
Livingston, and Pointe Coupee. The Lake Charles ozone nonattainment
area is classified as marginal and therefore is not required to
implement a Stage II program. The designations for ozone were published
in the FR on November 6, 1991, and November 30, 1992, and have been
codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). See 56 FR 56694
(November 6, 1991) and 57 FR 56762 (November 30, 1992), codified at 40
CFR 81.300 through 81.437. Under section 182(b)(3) of the CAAA,
Louisiana was required to submit Stage II vapor recovery rules for the
Baton Rouge nonattainment area by November 15, 1992. On November 10,
1992, Governor Edwin W. Edwards submitted to the EPA, Stage II vapor
recovery rules and a SIP Supplement dated November 15, 1992, which were
adopted by the State on November 10, 1992, and were published in the
Louisiana Register on November 20, 1992. By today's action, the EPA is
approving this submittal. The EPA has reviewed the State submittal
against the statutory requirements and for consistency with EPA
guidance. A summary of the EPA's analysis is provided below. In
addition, a more detailed analysis of the State submittal is contained
in a TSD, dated September 24, 1993, which is available from the EPA
Region 6 Office, listed above.
Applicability
Under section 182(b)(3) of the CAAA, States were required by
November 15, 1992, to adopt regulations requiring owners or operators
of gasoline dispensing systems to install and operate vapor recovery
equipment at their facilities. The CAAA specifies that these State
rules must apply to any facility that dispenses more than 10,000
gallons of gasoline per month or, in the case of an independent small
business marketer, any facility that dispenses more than 50,000 gallons
of gasoline per month. Section 324 of the CAAA defines an independent
small business marketer, which is fully set forth in the TSD. The State
has adopted the statutory definition of independent small business
marketer in its regulations.
The State has adopted a general applicability requirement of 10,000
gallons per month. The State has also chosen to exempt independent
small business marketers dispensing under 50,000 gallons per month.
As more fully discussed in the EPA's Enforcement Guidance and the
General Preamble (57 FR 13514), the State has provided that the gallons
of gasoline dispensed per month will be based on the average gasoline
throughput for the most recent two year period without facility
shutdown, and calculated monthly. If two year data is not available,
the calculation is based on the monthly average for the most recent 12
calendar months (including only those months for which the facility was
operating). The EPA finds the applicability requirements in the
Louisiana Stage II rule to be acceptable.
Implementation of Stage II
The CAAA specifies the time by which certain facilities must comply
with the State regulation. For facilities that are not owned or
operated by an independent small business marketer, these times,
calculated from the time of State adoption of the regulation, are: (1)
Six months for facilities for which construction began after November
15, 1990; (2) one year for facilities that dispense at least 100,000
gallons of gasoline per month; and (3) two years for all other
facilities. The Louisiana Stage II rule time schedule sets a compliance
schedule of six months after State rule promulgation, one year after
State rule promulgation, and two years after State rule promulgation,
respectively for the above three deadlines. For independent small
business marketers, section 324(a) of the CAAA provides that the time
periods may be: (1) 33 percent of the facilities owned by an
independent small business marketer by the end of the first year after
the regulations take effect; (2) 66 percent of such facilities by the
end of the second year; and (3) 100 percent of such facilities after
the third year. Although Louisiana promulgated its Stage II regulations
on November 20, 1992, five days after the SIP was required to be
submitted, the EPA believes it is appropriate to accept the State's
compliance schedule.
The EPA is approving the submitted time table for the following
reasons. First, the CAAA states that the adoption date must be used to
calculate the compliance schedule for Stage II implementation at
facilities. In this case, the EPA accepts Louisiana's approach of
triggering compliance dates from the date when the regulations were
promulgated. The compliance deadlines triggered by this date begin only
five days after the time schedule specified by the CAAA. The EPA
considers an additional five days to be of minimal impact and will have
no adverse impact on the integrity of the program. Also, the timetable
initiation date established by the State on November 20, 1992, began
shortly after adoption of the regulations. Secondly, remedying this
deficiency by amending the compliance schedule would cause further
delay in the implementation of Stage II in Louisiana, in that a State
revision to the Stage II rule could establish a new and later adoption
date and hence later compliance deadlines. Lastly, the Louisiana rule
otherwise fulfills the Stage II requirements, and the EPA believes it
will provide substantial air quality benefits to the regulated area.
Therefore, the EPA believes it is in the public interest to approve and
make enforceable this requirement at the earliest time feasible.
Additional Program Requirements
The State requires that Stage II systems be tested and certified to
meet a 95 percent emission reduction efficiency. The EPA has indicated
three acceptable methods of demonstrating a 95 percent emission
reduction efficiency: (1) A method tested and approved by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB); (2) a testing program that is
equivalent to the CARB program, that will be conducted by the Program
Oversight Agency (POA), or by a third party recognized by the POA, and
submitted and approved by the EPA for incorporation into the SIP; or
(3) a system approved by the CARB. The State has chosen to use a system
approved by the CARB, or an equivalent certification authority approved
by the administrative authority*. The State regulations define the
administrative authority* to include both the State Department of
Environmental Quality and the EPA. Thus, equivalent system
certification authorities would have to be formally approved by the EPA
and could be incorporated into the SIP.
The State requires sources to verify proper installation and
function of Stage II equipment through use of a liquid blockage test
and a leak test prior to system operation and every five years or upon
major modification of a facility's Stage II equipment (i.e., 75 percent
or more Stage II equipment change).
With respect to recordkeeping, the State has adopted those items
recommended in the EPA's guidance and specifies that sources subject to
Stage II must make the following documents available upon request: (1)
Application approval records and station operating license; (2) system
installation and testing results; (3) equipment maintenance and
compliance records; (4) training certification files; and (5)
inspection records. In addition, the State has committed in its SIP
supplement to maintain general station and enforcement files, including
information such as facility name, address, phone number, owner/
operator names, a State assigned reference number, date of initial
compliance with the regulations, number of pumps, monthly gasoline
throughput, and State enforcement actions. The State has also
established an inspection function consistent with that described in
the EPA's guidance. The State commits to conducting inspections of
facilities including a visual inspection of the Stage II equipment and
of the required records and a functional test of the Stage II
equipment. According to the Supplement, the State shall inspect each
facility at least one time per year. Finally, the State has established
procedures for enforcing violations of the Stage II requirements. Civil
penalties may be assessed of up to $25,000 per day per violation. The
EPA finds the State's program for implementation and enforcement of the
Stage II program to be consistent with the EPA guidelines.
Rulemaking Action
Since the EPA finds that the State has adopted a Stage II SIP in
accordance with section 182(b)(3) of the CAAA, as interpreted in the
EPA's guidance, the EPA is giving notice of its intent to approve the
submittal as a direct final action meeting the requirements of section
182(b)(3).
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
the EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no
adverse comments. This action will become effective May 24, 1994,
unless by April 25, 1994 notice is received that adverse or critical
comments will be submitted. If such notice is received, this action
will be withdrawn before the effective date by publishing two
subsequent documents. One document will withdraw the final action, and
another will begin a new rulemaking by announcing a proposal of the
action and establishing a comment period. If no such comments are
received, the public is advised that this action will be effective May
24, 1994.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to a SIP shall be
considered in light of specific technical, economical, and
environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
Regulatory Process
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., the EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604).
Alternatively, the EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the
CAAA do not create any new requirements, but simply approve
requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the
Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify
that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities
affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship
under the CAAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would
constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State
action. The CAAA forbids the EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on
such grounds (Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66
(S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)).
This action has been classified as a table two action by the
Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the FR on
January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225). On January 6, 1989, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) waived table two and table three SIP
revisions from the requirements of section three of Executive Order
12291 for a period of two years (54 FR 2222). The EPA has submitted a
request for a permanent waiver for table two and table three SIP
revisions. The OMB has agreed to continue the waiver until such time as
it rules on the EPA's request. This request is still applicable under
Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Note--Incorporation by reference of the SIP for the State of
Louisiana was approved by the Director of the Federal Register on
July 1, 1982.
Dated: February 4, 1994.
Jane N. Saginaw,
Regional Administrator.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The athority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart T--Louisiana
2. Sec. 52.970 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(61) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.970 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(61) A revision to the Louisiana SIP to include revisions to LAC,
Title 33, ``Environmental Quality,'' Part III. Air, Chapter 21, Control
of Emission of Organic Compounds, Section 2132--Stage II Vapor Recovery
Systems for Control of Vehicle Refuelling Emissions at Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities effective November 20, 1992, and submitted by the
Governor by cover letter dated November 10, 1992.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, ``Environmental Quality,'' Part
III. Air, Chapter 21, Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, Section
2132--Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems for Control of Vehicle Refuelling
Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, effective November 20,
1992; and Chapter 65, Section 6523--Fee Schedule Listing, effective
November 20, 1992.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) November 15, 1993, narrative plan addressing: legal authority,
control strategy, compliance schedules, air quality surveillance,
public notice, determination of regulated universe, Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality recordkeeping, facility
recordkeeping, annual in-use above ground inspections, program
penalties, training, and benefits.
[FR Doc. 94-7056 Filed 3-24-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.