Approval of Maintenance Plan and Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Ohio; Reopening of Comment Period
Federal RegisterFeb 18, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[OH06-1-5069, OH01-1-5046, OH32-1-5776; FRL-4838-9]
Approval of Maintenance Plan and Designation of Areas for Air
Quality Planning Purposes; Ohio; Reopening of Comment Period
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: USEPA is reopening the comment period for a proposed rule
published on December 20, 1993 (58 FR 66334). On December 20, 1993,
USEPA proposed disapproval of the ozone redesignation requests for
Preble, Columbiana and Jefferson Counties.
The USEPA is reopening the comment period for this action to honor
requests from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and the Regional
Air Pollution Control Agency to extend the comment period ninety days.
DATES: Comments regarding the proposed disapproval of the ozone
redesignation request for Preble County must be received by April 19,
1994.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: William L. MacDowell,
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE-17J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604 (312) 886-6798.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Lee, Regulation Development
Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE-17J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604,
(312) 353-5142.
Dated: January 28, 1994.
Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-3746 Filed 2-17-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.