Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Federal RegisterDec 21, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[IA-12-1-6529b; FRL-5125-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the state of Iowa. The state's request for
a revision to the SIP includes updating the state's incorporation by
reference and conformity to various Federal regulations. In the final
rules section of the Federal Register, the EPA is approving the state's
SIP revision as a direct-final rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval
is set forth in the direct final rule. If the EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on
this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period
on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document
should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 20, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Christopher D. Hess, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Branch, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher D. Hess at (913) 551-7213.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the direct
final rule which is located in the rules section of the Federal
Register.
Dated: October 20, 1994.
Dennis Grams,
P.E. Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-31269 Filed 12-20-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.