Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan for Montana; Missoula; PMINF10 and CO Contingency Measures and Local Regulations; Disapproval of Missoula Variance Provision
Federal RegisterDec 13, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[MT22-1-6399b, MT9-3-6561b, & MT13-2-6560b; FRL-5118-4]
Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation
Plan for Montana; Missoula; PM10 and CO Contingency Measures and
Local Regulations; Disapproval of Missoula Variance Provision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State implementation plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of Montana with a letter dated March
2, 1994. This submittal addresses the Federal Clean Air Act requirement
to submit contingency measures for both particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers
(PM10) and for carbon monoxide (CO) for the areas in Missoula
designated as nonattainment for the PM10 and CO National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Further, this submittal satisfies
several commitments made by the State in a previous PM10 SIP
submittal. Due to the completion of those commitments, EPA is proposing
to approve the related rules of the Missoula City-County Air Pollution
Control Program, as adopted by the Montana Board of Health and
Environmental Sciences on June 28, 1991 and amended on March 20, 1992
and November 19, 1993, and submitted by the Governor in letters dated
August 20, 1991, June 4, 1992, and March 2, 1994. These rules include
regulations regarding inspections, emergency procedures, minor source
construction permits, open burning, and wood waste burners. EPA also
proposes to approve minor revisions to previously approved Missoula
City-County Air Pollution Control Program Chapters VII and VIII, as
included in the March 2, 1994 submittal. Further, EPA declines to take
action on Missoula's minor source operating permit regulations.
Finally, EPA proposes to disapprove Missoula City-County Air Pollution
Control Program's Chapter X, Variances.
In the final rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is acting
on the State's SIP revisions as a direct final rule without prior
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision
amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for
EPA's actions is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse
comments are received in response to this proposed rule, no further
activity is contemplated and the direct final rule will become
effective. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will
be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by
January 12, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action should be addressed to Amy
Platt, 8ART-AP, at the EPA Regional Office listed below. Copies of the
State's submittal and documents relevant to this proposed rule are
available for inspection during normal business hours at the following
locations: Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Region
VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2405; and
Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Air Quality
Bureau, Cogswell Building, Helena, Montana 59620-0901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Platt at (303) 293-1769.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the direct
final rule which is located in the rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: November 29, 1994.
William P. Yellowtail,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-30513 Filed 12-12-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.