Petition for Waiver of Compliance
Federal RegisterDec 6, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with 49 CFR Sections 211.9 and 211.41, notice is
hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has
received from the Burlington Northern Railroad a request for waiver of
compliance with certain requirements of the Federal rail safety
regulations. The petition is described below, including the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested and the
petitioners arguments in favor of relief.
Burlington Northern Railroad (BN) (Waiver Petition Docket Number SA-94-
10)
The BN seeks a waiver of compliance from certain sections of the
Railroad Safety Appliance Standards (49 CFR Part 231). BN requests a
waiver from 49 CFR 231.4--Fixed-end low-side gondola and low-side
hopper cars; (a)(3)(ii) states: ``The brake shaft shall be located on
end of car, to the left of and not more than 22-inches from center.''
This regulation has been applied to coiled steel cars that have end
platforms, commonly identified as a coiled steel gondola.
BN is requesting that the wording be adopted as used in 49 CFR
231.6--Flat cars (3)(ii): ``The brake shaft shall be located on end of
car to the left of center, or on side of car not more than 36 inches
from right-hand end thereof.''
BN states that modern flat cars, particularly double stack cars,
have used handbrakes in complete compliance with 49 CFR
231.6(a)(3)(ii), which locates the handbrake lower to the ground and
closer to the side sill than allowed by other specified car types. This
has led to a handbrake application that makes it possible to apply or
release the handbrake from the ground when the car is stopped, or while
riding the car when it is moving. Additionally, coil cars have been
built that have an end platform and appear similar to a flat car,
especially toward the end of the car. Historically, the handbrake has
been mounted to the end of the trough bulkhead, inboard of the end
platform. This requires a person to climb onto the car to operate the
handbrake. At this location the handbrake is very susceptible to damage
when the coils are loaded into the car. By lowering the handbrake and
moving it outboard on the end sill, the handbrake is out of the way of
the loading process and less likely to be damaged. The BN request is to
locate the handbrake on the end sill and toward the side sill in excess
of the 22-inches from the cars center line on coil cars having
platforms with a AAR gondola mechanical designation. This request is to
include all coil cars equipped with end platforms.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number SA-94-
10) and must be submitted in triplicate to the Docket Clerk, Office of
Chief Counsel, FRA, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. Communications received before January 13, 1995
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.) in Room
8201, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590.
Issued in Washington, DC on November 30, 1994.
Phil Olekszyk,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Compliance and Program
Implementation.
[FR Doc. 94-29897 Filed 12-5-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.