Certain Textile Mill Products From Peru; Termination of Company- Specific Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order
Federal RegisterNov 10, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[C-333-402]
Certain Textile Mill Products From Peru; Termination of Company-
Specific Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Termination of Company-Specific Administrative Review
of Countervailing Duty Order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is terminating the
company-specific administrative review of the countervailing duty order
on certain textile mill products from Peru, initiated on April 15,
1994.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 10, 1994.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martina Tkadlec or Kelly Parkhill,
Office of Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230,
telephone: (202) 482-2786.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 29, 1994, Credisa Division Textil, S.A. (Credisa), a
producer and exporter of the subject merchandise, requested a company-
specific administrative review of the countervailing duty order on
certain textile mill products from Peru for the period May 18, 1992,
through December 31, 1993, pursuant to 19 CFR 355.22(a)(2). No other
interested party requested a review. On April 15, 1994, the Department
published a notice initiating the company-specific administrative
review for that period (59 FR 18099). On September 28, 1994, Credisa
withdrew its request for review.
Section 355.22(a)(3) of the Department's regulations (19 CFR
355.22(a)(3)) stipulates that the Secretary may permit a party that
requests a review to withdraw the request not later than 90 days after
the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested
review. This regulation also provides that the Secretary may extend the
time limit for withdrawal of a request if it is reasonable to do so.
Because no significant work has been done on this review, Credisa's
request does not unduly burden the Department under the circumstances
presented in this review, we are waiving the 90-day requirement in 19
CFR 355.22(a)(3). Accordingly, we are terminating this review.
This notice is published in accordance with 19 CFR 355.22(a)(3).
Dated: November 1, 1994.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 94-27789 Filed 11-9-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.