Yankee Atomic Electric Company, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings
Federal RegisterNov 2, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER92-592-004, et al.]
Yankee Atomic Electric Company, et al.; Electric Rate and
Corporate Regulation Filings
October 26, 1994.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Yankee Atomic Electric Company
[Docket No. ER92-592-004]
Take notice that on October 20, 1994, Yankee Atomic Electric
Company (Yankee), tendered for filing its compliance refund report
pursuant to the Commission's order issued June 15, 1994.
Copies of the tendered filing have been served by Yankee upon the
other parties to the above-captioned proceeding.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
2. Northwest Regional Transmission Association
[Docket No. ER95-19-000]
Take notice that on October 20, 1994, Portland General Electric
Company (PGE) tendered for filing on behalf of itself, Puget Sound
Power & Light Company, City of Tacoma Department of Public Utilities,
Western Montana Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc., Pacific
Northwest Generating Cooperative, and Tenaska Power Services (together,
the Filing Parties) a letter of support for the Northwest Regional
Transmission Association from PacifiCorp.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
3. New England Power Company
[Docket No. ER95-35-000]
Take notice that on October 13, 1994, New England Power Company,
tendered for filing its Interconnection System Study Agreement with
Altresco Lynn Limited Partnership.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
4. The Potomac Edison Company
[Docket No. ER95-39-000]
Take notice that on October 14, 1994, The Potomac Edison Company,
tendered for filing proposed changes in its FERC Electric Tariff, First
Revised Volume No. 3. The proposed changes would increase revenues from
jurisdictional sales and service by $3.81 million based on the twelve
month period ending December 31, 1995. The proposed effective date for
the increased rates is January 1, 1995.
Copies of the filing have been provided to the Pennsylvania Public
Utility Commission, the Maryland Public Service Commission, the
Virginia State Corporation Commission, the West Virginia Public Service
Commission, and all parties of record.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
5. Illinois Power Company
[Docket No. ER95-42-000]
Take notice that on October 18, 1994, Illinois Power Company
(Illinois) tendered for filing an Interchange Agreement between
Illinois and Electric Clearinghouse, Inc. (ECI). Illinois states that
the purpose of this agreement is to provide for the buying and selling
of capacity and energy between Illinois and ECI.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
6. New York State Electric & Gas Corporation
[Docket Nos. ER95-44-000 and EC95-2-000]
Take notice that on October 18, 1994, New York State Electric & Gas
Corporation (NYSEG), tendered for filing the following: (1) A request
for authorization to sell facilities used for transmission of electric
energy in interstate commerce, pursuant to Sec. 203(a) of the Federal
Power Act, and (2) an amendment to its Agreement with Niagara Mohawk
Power Corporation (NMPC), designated NYSEG Rate Schedule FERC No. 90,
pursuant to Sec. 203(b) of the Federal Power Act.
The filings concern the sale (the ``Transaction'') of 10.04 miles
of 69 kV electric transmission line and certain related facilities and
property rights to NMPC; and an amendment to a facilities charge
agreement. To the extent necessary, NYSEG requests waiver of the notice
requirements so that the Transaction may take place and the amendment
may become effective in accordance with the terms of the amendment.
Copies of the filing were served upon the Niagara Mohawk Power
Corporation and on the Public Service Commission of the State of New
York.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
7. Montaup Electric Company
[Docket No. ER95-45-000]
Take notice that on October 18, 1994, Montaup Electric Company
tendered for filing its FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. III,
Unit Sale Tariff and its FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. IV,
System Sales and Exchange Tariff. Tariff III provides for sales for
resale of unit capacity and associated energy and Tariff IV provides
for sales for resale of system capacity and associated energy. Tariff
IV also allows a buyer to provide capacity from one of its units.
Montaup requests that the tariffs be allowed to become effective 60
days from to date of filing, on December 18, 1994.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
8. Puget Sound Power & Light Company
[Docket No. ER95-47-000]
Take notice that on October 19, 1994, Puget Sound Power & Light
Company (Puget) tendered for filing, as an initial rate schedule, the
PNW AC Intertie Capacity Ownership Agreement by and between the United
States of America Department of Energy acting by and through the
Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) and Puget, together with
exhibits thereto (the Agreement). A copy of the filing was served upon
Bonneville.
Puget states that the Agreement relates to the purchase by Puget of
a certain amount of the transfer capability of Bonneville's PNW AC
Intertie and also provides for Puget to (a) return to Bonneville an
amount of electric energy to compensate Bonneville for transmission
losses and (b) under certain conditions, to permit Bonneville to use
Puget's unused share of the transfer capability of Bonneville's PNW AC
Intertie.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
9. San Diego Gas & Electric Company
[Docket No. ER95-51-000]
Take notice that on October 20, 1994, San Diego Gas & Electric
Company (SDG&E), tendered for filing and acceptance, pursuant to 18 CFR
Sec. 35.12, an Interchange Agreement (Agreement) between SDG&E and the
City of Burbank (Burbank).
SDG&E requests that the Commission allow the Agreement to become
effective on the 2nd day of January, 1995, or at the earliest possible
date.
Copies of this filing were served upon the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California and Burbank.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
10. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation
[Docket No. ER95-53-000]
Take notice that on October 20, 1994, Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation (CHG&E), tendered for filing, pursuant to 18 CFR
Sec. 35.13, proposed changes in its FERC Rate Schedule No. 3 for
borderline sales to New York State Electric & Gas Corporation. CHG&E is
requesting an effective date of December 21, 1993, for this tariff rate
change. Accordingly, CHG&E has also requested a waiver of Commission's
notice requirements for good cause shown.
CHG&E has sent a copy of this filing to New York State Electric &
Gas Corporation, P.O. Box 3287, Ithaca, NY 14852-3287.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
11. Duke Power Company
[Docket No. ER95-54-000]
Take notice that on October 20, 1994, Duke Power Company (Duke),
filed contract amendments to Rate Schedules contained in Duke's
interchange agreements with South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
(SCE&G) (Duke Rate Schedule FERC No. 293). The purpose of this filing
is to amend the existing Spinning Reserve Service Schedules to lessen
the amount of time one company can obtain emergency capacity from the
other without a demand charge and eliminate those references to
Spinning Reserve which are not consistent with the operating guidelines
of the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC).
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
12. Indianapolis Power & Light Company
[Docket No. ER95-55-000]
Take notice that on October 21, 1994, Indianapolis Power & Light
Company (IPL), tendered for filing an initial rate schedule consisting
of the Interconnection Agreement between IPL and the Indiana Municipal
Power Agency.
Copies of this filing were sent to the Indiana Municipal Power
Agency and the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
13. Portland General Electric Company
[Docket No. ER95-56-000]
Take notice that on October 21, 1994, Portland General Electric
Company (PGE), tendered for filing a Short-Term Utility Replacement
Energy Agreement between Puget Sound Power & Light Company, Portland
General Electric Company, PacifiCorp, the Washington Water Power
Company, Colockum Transmission Company, Inc., and the Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA), BPA Contract No. DE-MS79-94BP94427. Copies of
this filing have been served on the parties included in the service
list attached to the filing letter.
The Agreement provides for BPA to sell flow augmentation
replacement energy to PGE. PGE asks that the Commission find that the
Agreement does not need to be filed with the Commission; and in the
alternative, that the Agreement be effective sixty (60) days after the
date of the instant filing, or on the date of acceptance by the
Commission, whichever is sooner.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
14. Southern Company Services, Inc.
[Docket No. ER95-59-000]
Take notice that on October 21, 1994, Southern Company Services,
Inc., acting as agent for Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, and Savannah Electric
and Power Company (the ``Southern Companies''), submitted for filing
Amendment No. 5 to the Intercompany Interchange Contracted dated
October 31, 1988. In addition, Southern Companies have filed amendments
to certain unit power and interchange agreements between Southern
Companies and Florida Power & Light Company, Florida Power Corporation,
Jacksonville Electric Authority, the City of Tallahassee, Florida,
South Carolina Public Service Authority, Duke Power Company, Cajun
Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., and Gulf States Utilities Company,
respectively. Southern Companies also have informed the Commission of a
proposed change in practice under Southern Companies' interchange
contracts with Tennessee Valley Authority, Mississippi Power & Light
Company, and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company. The purpose of this
filing is to declare changes in practice and to amend energy rates
contained in the foregoing agreements to reflect the energy-related
costs incurred by Southern Companies to ensure compliance with the
Phase I sulfur dioxide emissions limitations of the Clean Air Act
Amendment of 1990.
Comment date: November 10, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
15. Goal Line, L.P.
[Docket Nos. QF92-179-002 and EL95-6-000]
Take notice that on October 18, 1994, Goal Line, L.P. (Goal Line),
tendered for filing a request for limited waiver of the Commission's
Regulations under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978
(PURPA). Goal Line requests the Commission to temporarily waive the
operating and efficiency standards for qualifying cogeneration
facilities as set forth in Sec. 292.205 of the Commission's
Regulations, implementing Section 201 of PURPA, as amended, 18 CFR
292.205, with respect to its 49.8 MW cogeneration facility located in
Escondido, California. Specifically, Goal Line requests waiver of the
operating and efficiency standards for the calendar year 1994.
Comment date: Thirty days from the date of publication in the
Federal Register, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of
this notice.
16. Tenaska IV Texas Partners, Ltd.,
[Docket No. QF94-84-002]
On October 20, 1994, Tenaska IV Texas Partners, Ltd., (Applicant),
of 1044 North 115 Street, Suite 400, Omaha, Nebraska 68154, submitted
for filing an application for certification of a facility as a
qualifying cogeneration facility pursuant to Sec. 292.207(b) of the
Commission's Regulations. No determination has been made that the
submittal constitutes a complete filing.
According to the applicant, the topping-cycle cogeneration facility
will be located in Cleburne, Texas, and will consist of a combustion
turbine generator, a heat recovery boiler equipped with duct burning,
and an extraction/condensing steam turbine generator. Steam recovered
from the facility will be used by the applicant for the manufacturing
of distill water for sale to a third party. The primary energy source
will be natural gas. The maximum net electric power production capacity
of the facility will be 284 MW. Construction of the facility is
scheduled to begin in April, 1995.
Comment date: Thirty days from the date published in the Federal
Register, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this
notice.
17. The Wisconsin Public Power Incorporated System
[Docket No. TX95-2-000]
Take notice that on October 17, 1994, The Wisconsin Public Power
Incorporated System (WPPI) tendered for filing an application
requesting that the Commission order Wisconsin Electric Power Company
(WEPCO), Wisconsin Power and Light Company (WP&L), and Wisconsin Public
Service Corporation (WPS) jointly, joint network tariff to provide
network transmission services on a joint, single-system basis to WPPI.
The application was filed pursuant to Section 211 of the Federal Power
Act, as amended by Energy Policy Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 824j).
In its application, WPPI requests that network service be provided
commencing on May 1, 1995, and continuing on a long-term basis
thereafter. The total transmission capacity requested would be
sufficient for WPPI to integrate its load in eastern Wisconsin (now
approximately 482 MW) with WPPI's resources. The service requested is
network service over the integrated transmission grid of the EWU. The
service requested includes both long and short-term firm and non-firm
use, comparable in all respects to the EWU's use of the EWU grid. WPPI
seeks services that will allow it, subject to existing power purchase
contracts, (i) to schedule power and energy from a variety of sources
within and outside of the EWU grid to WPPI's loads within the control
areas of WP&L, WEPCO and WPS on an economic dispatch basis and in
response to planned and unplanned outages and (ii) to engage in
coordination purchases and sales using the EWU grid in the same manner
as the owners of that grid schedule their power and energy
transactions. The service would be costed on single-system basis for
the EWU, with one joint rate for use of the integrated transmission
system of three utilities. Revenues would be shared by the EWU. WPPI
also requested that the EWU unbundle their transmission services from
power sales services.
Copies of the application have been served upon the affected
parties, WEPCO, WP&L, WPS, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin,
and upon Madison Gas & Electric Company.
Comment date: November 9, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date.
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-27142 Filed 11-1-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.