Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Michigan: Extension of Public Comment Period
Federal RegisterOct 6, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[MI26-02-6660; FRL-5075-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Michigan:
Extension of Public Comment Period
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On August 10, 1994 the EPA proposed to approve, through
``direct final'' procedure, the exemption request from the requirements
contained in section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act (Act) for the Detroit-
Ann Arbor ozone nonattainment area in Michigan. See 59 FR 40840
(proposed rule) and 59 FR 40826 (final rule). The EPA has received
adverse comments and requests for an extension of the public comment
period. As a result, the public comment period will be extended an
additional 30 days from the date of the publication of this action.
Under the ``direct final'' procedures all public comments received will
be addressed in a subsequent final rule (based upon the proposed rule
cited above).
DATES: The public comment period is extended until November 7, 1994.
ADDRESSES: All written comments should be addressed to: Carlton T.
Nash, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Toxics and Radiation
Branch (AT-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604-3590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Aburano, Regulation
Development Section, Air Toxics and Radiation Branch (AT-18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois, 60604-3590.
Dated: September 7, 1994.
Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-24676 Filed 10-5-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.