Clean Air Act Interim Approval of Operating Permit Program; State of Wyoming
Federal RegisterSep 23, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 70
[WY-001a; FRL-5076-2]
Clean Air Act Interim Approval of Operating Permit Program; State
of Wyoming
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is promulgating interim approval of the Operating
Permit Program submitted by the State of Wyoming. Wyoming's Operating
Permit Program was submitted for the purpose of complying with Federal
requirements which mandate that states develop, and submit to EPA,
programs for issuing operating permits to all major stationary sources,
and to certain other sources.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective on November 22, 1994 unless
adverse or critical comments are received by October 24, 1994. If the
effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Laura Farris, 8ART-AP, at
the EPA Regional 8 Office listed.
Copies of the State's submittal and other supporting information
used in developing this final rule are available for public inspection
during normal business hours at the following location: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 18th Street, suite 500,
Denver, Colorado 80202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Farris, 8ART-AP, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 18th Street, suite 500,
Denver, Colorado 80202, (303) 294-7539.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
As required under title V of the Clean Air Act (``the Act'') as
amended (1990), EPA has promulgated rules which define the minimum
elements of an approvable state operating permit program and the
corresponding standards and procedures by which the EPA will approve,
oversee, and withdraw approval of state operating permit programs (see
57 FR 32250 (July 21, 1992)). These rules are codified at 40 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 70 (part 70). title V requires states to
develop, and submit to EPA, programs for issuing these operating
permits to all major stationary sources and to certain other sources.
The Act requires that states develop and submit these programs to
EPA by November 15, 1993, and that EPA act to approve or disapprove
each program within 1 year after receiving the submittal. The EPA's
program review occurs pursuant to section 502 of the Act and the part
70 regulations, which together outline criteria for approval or
disapproval. Where a program substantially, but not fully, meets the
requirements of part 70, EPA may grant the program interim approval for
a period of up to 2 years. If EPA has not fully approved a program by 2
years after the November 15, 1993 date, or by the end of an interim
program, it must establish and implement a Federal program.
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, the EPA is proposing interim approval of the
Operating Permit Program submitted by the State of Wyoming should
adverse or critical comments be filed. Under the procedures established
in the May 10, 1994 Federal Register, this action will be effective on
November 22, 1994 unless, by October 24, 1994, adverse or critical
comments are received.
If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a
proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this
time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this
action will be effective on November 22, 1994.
II. Final Action and Implications
A. Analysis of State Submission
1. Support Materials
The Governor of Wyoming submitted an administratively complete
title V Operating Permit Program (PROGRAM) for the State of Wyoming on
November 19, 1993. EPA deemed the PROGRAM administratively complete in
a letter to the Governor dated January 4, 1994. The PROGRAM submittal
includes a legal opinion from the Attorney General of Wyoming stating
that the laws of the State provide adequate legal authority to carry
out all aspects of the PROGRAM, and a description of how the State
intends to implement the PROGRAM. The submittal additionally contains
evidence of proper adoption of the PROGRAM regulations, application and
permit forms, and a permit fee demonstration.
2. Regulations and Program Implementation
The Wyoming PROGRAM, including the operating permit regulation
(Section 30 of the Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations),
substantially meets the requirements of 40 CFR 70.2 and 70.3 with
respect to applicability; 40 CFR 70.4, 70.5, and 70.6 with respect to
permit content including operational flexibility; 40 CFR 70.5 with
respect to complete application forms and criteria which define
insignificant activities (emission thresholds are identified in section
30 as one ton per year for regulated pollutants, excluding hazardous
air pollutant [HAP] sources, and 1000 pounds per year for HAPs); 40 CFR
70.7 with respect to public participation and minor permit
modifications; and 40 CFR 70.11 with respect to requirements for
enforcement authority.
Wyoming has the authority to issue a variance from requirements
imposed by State law (36-11-601 W.S.A.). The EPA regards this provision
as wholly external to the PROGRAM submitted for approval under part 70,
and consequently is proposing to take no action on this provision of
State law. The EPA has no authority to approve provisions of State law,
such as the variance provision referred to, which are inconsistent with
the Act. The EPA does not recognize the ability of a permitting
authority to grant relief from the duty to comply with a federally
enforceable part 70 permit, except where such relief is granted through
procedures allowed by part 70. The EPA reserves the right to enforce
the terms of the part 70 permit where the permitting authority purports
to grant relief from the duty to comply with a part 70 permit in a
manner inconsistent with part 70 procedures.
Part 70 of the operating permit regulations requires prompt
reporting of deviations from the permit requirements. Section
70.6(a)(3)(iii)(B) requires the permitting authority to define prompt
in relation to the degree and type of deviation likely to occur and the
applicable requirements. Although the permit program regulations should
define prompt for purposes of administrative efficiency and clarity, an
acceptable alternative is to define prompt in each individual permit.
The EPA believes that prompt should generally be defined as requiring
reporting within two to ten days of the deviation. Two to ten days is
sufficient time in most cases to protect public health and safety as
well as to provide a forewarning of potential problems. For sources
with a low level of excess emissions, a longer time period may be
acceptable. However, prompt reporting must be more frequent than the
semiannual reporting requirement, given this is a distinct reporting
obligation under Sec. 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A). Where ``prompt'' is defined
in the individual permit but not in the program regulations, EPA may
veto permits that do not contain sufficiently prompt reporting of
deviations. The Wyoming PROGRAM has not defined prompt reporting of
deviations.
A letter sent to the State dated May 10, 1994, identified areas in
which the Wyoming PROGRAM was deficient and the corrective actions that
were to be completed either prior to interim PROGRAM approval or prior
to full PROGRAM approval. In a letter dated June 7, 1994, which
included an Attorney General's opinion dated June 6, 1994, the State
addressed all EPA issues that would have prevented EPA from issuing
interim approval of the Wyoming PROGRAM.
The State has not addressed those issues that require corrective
action prior to full PROGRAM approval. Areas in which the Wyoming
PROGRAM is deficient and require corrective action prior to full
PROGRAM approval are as follows: (1) Section 30 states that research
and development (R&D) operations will be considered as separate and
discrete stationary sources when determining whether such operations
are subject to the PROGRAM. If an R&D facility is a support facility
(co-located with a separate source, under common ownership or control
and 50% of the output of the support unit is used by the main
activity), the emissions from this R&D facility must be included, along
with all other emissions at the source, to determine applicability to
section 30. Section 30 must be revised to assure R&D support facilities
are included in major source determinations. (2) Language in the
Wyoming Environmental Quality Act (WEQA) appears to reduce the penalty
for civil violations committed by surface coal mine operations from a
maximum of ten thousand dollars per day to five thousand dollars per
day. This language needs to be changed in the WEQA or clarified in an
Attorney General's opinion to indicate that the five thousand dollar
penalty relates only to activities subject to the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act. (3) The WEQA bases individual and
corporate liability on knowing and willful violations of the WEQA. This
statute needs to be revised to include language that provides strict
liability for corporate officers, directors or agents in civil actions.
(4) The WEQA does not provide for a per day, per violation penalty for
false statements or tampering with monitoring devices, only a fine of
ten thousand dollars or imprisonment for one year in county jail, or
both. The statute needs to be changed to include a per day, per
violation penalty. (5) Section 30 requires insignificant activities to
be listed in permit applications, but does not require that applicable
requirements that might apply to such activities be identified. The
general provision of 40 CFR 70.5(c) ensures that information concerning
applicable requirements will be included in the application. Section 30
must be revised to include language similar to the general provision in
40 CFR 70.5(c), or an AG's opinion must clarify that the State will
ensure that all applicable requirements are identified for any
insignificant activities. (6) The provision in section 30 regarding
general permits is inconsistent with Sec. 70.6(d) because they do not
require notice and an opportunity for public participation consistent
with Sec. 70.7(h). This provision must be revised or clarified in an
Attorney General's Opinion. (7) It is unclear if section 30 provides
the State with authority to implement emissions trading under a permit
cap, which is required by Sec. 70.4(b)(12)(iii). The State must clarify
its authority on this issue, or revise section 30 to provide such
authority. (8) The Governor's letter submitting the Wyoming PROGRAM
states that the PROGRAM will apply to all applicable operating
stationary sources of air pollutants within the State of Wyoming ``with
the exception of those sources located on Indian lands.'' However, the
PROGRAM does not define ``Indian lands.'' The State must provide such a
definition prior to full PROGRAM approval.
Refer to the technical support document accompanying this
rulemaking for a detailed explanation of each PROGRAM deficiency and
the State's corrective actions, where provided.
3. Permit Fee Demonstration
The State of Wyoming established an initial fee for regulated air
pollutants below the presumptive minimum set in title V, section 502
and part 70, and was required to submit a detailed permit fee
demonstration as part of its PROGRAM submittal. The basis of this fee
demonstration included a workload analysis, which estimated the annual
cost of running the PROGRAM to be $1.43 million. This amount, divided
by the total actual emissions from part 70 sources, resulted in a $10
per ton fee for actual emissions of regulated air pollutants for fiscal
year 1993 (fees will not be charged on emissions exceeding 4,000 tons
per year per pollutant at a source). This fee structure is subject to a
biennial review by the Wyoming Joint Minerals, Business and Economic
Development Committee. After careful review, the State of Wyoming
determined that these fees would support the PROGRAM costs as required
by 40 CFR 70.9(a). Upon review of this demonstration, the EPA noted the
following concern: The WEQA gives the State the authority to assess and
collect annual permit fees in an amount sufficient to cover all
reasonable direct and indirect costs of the PROGRAM for a two year
period of time. The Wyoming Legislature must authorize an increase in
such fees. If such an increase is not granted, and the State is not
able to fund all the costs of the PROGRAM, the EPA would be required to
disapprove or withdraw the part 70 program, impose sanctions, and
implement a Federal permitting program.
4. Provisions Implementing the Requirements of Other Titles of the Act
a. Authority and/or Commitments for section 112 Implementation.
Wyoming has demonstrated in its PROGRAM submittal adequate legal
authority to implement and enforce all section 112 requirements through
the title V permit. This legal authority is contained in Wyoming's WEQA
and in regulatory provisions defining ``applicable requirements'' by
stating that the permit must incorporate all applicable requirements.
EPA has determined that this legal authority is sufficient to allow
Wyoming to issue permits that assure compliance with all section 112
requirements.
For further rationale on this interpretation, please refer to the
Technical Support Document accompanying this rulemaking and the April
13, 1993 guidance memorandum titled ``Title V Program Approval Criteria
for Section 112 Activities,'' signed by John Seitz.
b. Implementation of 112(g) Upon Program Approval. As a condition
of approval of the part 70 PROGRAM, Wyoming is required to implement
section 112(g) of the Act from the effective date of the part 70
PROGRAM. Imposition of case-by-case determinations of a maximum
achievable control technology (MACT) under section 112(g) will require
the use of a mechanism for establishing federally enforceable
restrictions on a source-specific basis. The EPA is proposing to
approve Wyoming's preconstruction permitting program found in section
24, under the authority of title V and part 70 solely for the purpose
of implementing section 112(g) during the transition period between
title V approval and adoption of a State rule implementing EPA's
section 112(g) regulations. EPA believes this approval is necessary so
that Wyoming has a mechanism in place to establish federally
enforceable restrictions for section 112(g) purposes from the date of
part 70 approval. Section 112(l) provides statutory authority for
approval for the use of State air programs to implement section 112(g),
and title V and section 112(g) provide authority for this limited
approval because of the direct linkage between implementation of
section 112(g) and title V. The scope of this approval is narrowly
limited to section 112(g), and does not confer or imply approval for
purposes of any other provision under the Act. If Wyoming does not wish
to implement section 112(g) through its preconstruction permit program
and can demonstrate that an alternative means of implementing section
112(g) exists, the EPA may, in the final action approving Wyoming's
PROGRAM, approve the alternative instead. To the extent the State does
not have the authority to regulate HAPs through existing State law, the
State may disallow modifications during the transition period.
This approval is for an interim period only, until such time as the
State is able to adopt regulations consistent with any regulations
promulgated by EPA to implement section 112(g). Accordingly, EPA is
proposing to limit the duration of this approval to a reasonable time
following promulgation of section 112(g) regulations so that Wyoming,
acting expeditiously, will be able to adopt regulations consistent with
the section 112(g) regulations. The EPA is proposing here to limit the
duration of this approval to 18 months following promulgation by EPA of
section 112(g) regulations. Comment is solicited on whether 18 months
is an appropriate period considering Wyoming's procedures for adoption
of Federal regulations.
c. Program for Straight Delegation of section 112 Standards.
Requirements for approval, specified in 40 CFR 70.4(b), encompass
section 112(l)(5) requirements for approval of a program for delegation
of section 112 general provisions subpart A and standards as
promulgated by EPA as they apply to part 70 sources. Section 112(l)(5)
requires that the State's program contain adequate authorities,
adequate resources for implementation, and an expeditious compliance
schedule, which are also requirements under part 70. The State of
Wyoming acknowledges that its request for approval of a part 70 program
is also a request for approval of a program for delegation of unchanged
existing and future section 112 requirements under the authority of
section 112(l) as they apply to part 70 sources. This shall include the
most recent versions of any existing standards and all future
requirements promulgated under section 112, including the general
provisions for part 63 and all other infrastructure rules. The State
can now receive delegation of any new authority required by section 112
of the Act through the delegation process.
The radionuclide national emission standard for HAPs (NESHAP) is a
section 112 regulation and therefore, also an applicable requirement
under the State PROGRAM. Sources which are currently defined as part 70
sources and emit radionuclides are subject to Federal radionuclide
standards. Currently the State of Wyoming has no such sources. However,
sources which are not currently part 70 sources may be defined as major
sources under forthcoming Federal radionuclide regulations. The EPA
will work with the State in the development of its radionuclide program
to ensure that permits are issued in a timely manner.
The State also has the option at any time to request, under section
112(l) of the Act, delegation of section 112 requirements in the form
of State regulations which the State demonstrates are equivalent to the
corresponding section 112 provisions promulgated by EPA. At this time,
the State plans to use the mechanism of case-by-case rulemaking to
adopt unchanged Federal section 112 requirements into its regulations.
Therefore, the EPA is also proposing to grant approval under
section 112(l)(5) and 40 CFR 63.91 of the State's program for receiving
delegation of section 112 standards that are unchanged from the Federal
standards as promulgated.
d. Program for Implementing Title IV of the Act. Wyoming's PROGRAM
contains adequate authority to issue permits which reflect the
requirements of title IV of the Act, and commits to adopt the rules and
requirements promulgated by EPA to implement an acid rain program
through the title V permit.
B. Options for Approval/Disapproval and Implications
The EPA is promulgating interim approval to the operating permit
program submitted by the State of Wyoming on November 19, 1993. The
State must make the changes discussed above to receive full approval.
Evidence of these statutory and regulatory revisions must be submitted
to EPA within 18 months of EPA's interim approval of the Wyoming
PROGRAM.
At the time of this document, the State had not made an affirmative
showing of legal authority to regulate sources within the exterior
boundaries of Indian Reservations in Wyoming under the Act. Therefore,
interim approval of the Wyoming PROGRAM will not extend to lands within
the exterior boundaries of Indian Reservations. Until the State makes
such a showing, part 70 sources within the exterior boundaries of
Indian Reservations in Wyoming will be subject to the Federal operating
permit program to be promulgated in 40 CFR part 71, or subject to the
program of any Tribe delegated such authority under section 301(d) of
the Act. The EPA anticipates promulgating an Indian Air Regulation, at
which time how the State defines Indian lands could become an approval
issue.
This interim approval, which may not be renewed, extends for a
period of up to two years. During the interim approval period, the
State is protected from sanctions for failure to have a program, and
EPA is not obligated to promulgate a Federal permit program in the
State. Permits issued under a program with interim approval have full
standing with respect to part 70, and the one year time period for
submittal of permit applications by subject sources begins upon interim
approval, as does the three year time period for processing the initial
permit applications.
Requirements for approval, specified in 40 CFR 70.4(b), encompass
section 112(l)(5) requirements for approval of a program for delegation
of section 112 standards as promulgated by EPA as they apply to part 70
sources. Section 112(l)(5) requires that the State's program contain
adequate authorities, adequate resources for implementation, and an
expeditious compliance schedule, which are also requirements under part
70. Therefore, the EPA is also proposing to grant approval under
section 112(l)(5) and 40 CFR 63.91 of the State's program for receiving
delegation of section 112 standards that are unchanged from Federal
standards as promulgated. This program for delegations only applies to
sources covered by the part 70 program.
III. Administrative Requirements
A. Request for Public Comments
The EPA is requesting comments on all aspects of this direct final
rule. Copies of the State's submittal and other information relied upon
for the development of this rule are contained in a docket maintained
at the EPA Regional Office. The docket is an organized and complete
file of all the information submitted to, or otherwise considered by,
EPA in the review of the PROGRAM and development of this rule. The
principal purposes of the docket are:
(1) To allow interested parties a means to identify and locate
documents so that they can effectively participate in the rulemaking
process; and
(2) To serve as the record in case of judicial review. The EPA will
consider any comments received by October 24, 1994.
B. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from
Executive Order 12866 review.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The EPA's actions under section 502 of the Act do not create any
new requirements, but simply address operating permit programs
submitted to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR part 70. Because this
action does not impose any new requirements, it does not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Dated: September 14, 1994.
Kerrigan Clough,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-23599 Filed 9-22-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.