Mergers or Conversions of Federally-Insured Credit Unions: NCUA Approval
Federal RegisterSep 23, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 708a
Mergers or Conversions of Federally-Insured Credit Unions: NCUA
Approval
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NCUA is adopting a new rule, part 708a, to clarify that
the NCUA Board must approve any merger or conversion of a federally
insured credit union to any non credit union institution. The Board
also requests additional comment on a number of issues related to the
circumstances under which these transactions should be approved and
related to protecting the interests of credit unions and their
membership.
DATES: Effective Date: The interim final rule is effective September
23, 1994.
Comments: Comments must be postmarked or posted on the NCUA
electronic bulletin board by November 22, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314-3428.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary F. Rupp, Staff Attorney, Office of General Counsel, at the above
address or telephone: (703) 518-6553.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part 708 of the NCUA Rules and Regulations
sets forth procedures and requirements for mergers and for terminations
or conversions of insurance. As presently drafted, part 708 addresses
situations where an insured credit union drops NCUSIF insurance, either
in connection with a merger or through a voluntary termination or
conversion of insurance, but retains its status as a credit union. It
does not, however, address situations where a credit union drops NCUSIF
insurance in connection with a merger with or conversion into a savings
bank or other non credit union institution. In response to recent
solicitations by outside attorneys and consultants to credit unions
encouraging them to merge or convert to a mutual savings bank or a
stock institution, NCUA issued a proposal to amend part 708 in order to
clarify that it applies to all merger and termination or conversion
situations where the continuing institution is not insured by the
National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF). 59 FR 33702 (June
30, 1994).
Sixteen Comments were received in response to the proposal. Of the
14 that addressed the requirement that a federally-insured credit union
contemplating merger with or conversion to a non credit union
institution comply with part 708, 12 were in favor of the
clarification. The two opposing commenters were a bank trade group and
a state-chartered credit union. The bank trade group characterized the
proposed rule as an effort to ``increase the barriers to exiting the
NCUA system.'' The other opposing commenter offered no rationale for
their opposition. The favorable comments consistently stressed that the
members need to be properly informed and that the NCUA needs to ensure
that the merger or conversion would be in the members' interests. These
commenters argued that there is a need to protect the interests of
credit unions and their membership from the potentially self motivated
interests of lawyers, consultants and credit union insiders.
The issues raised by conversions of credit unions to banks are new
to the NCUA and require further study. The Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) have
recently addressed similar issues. On May 3, 1994, OTS published an
interim final rule and on August 30, 1994, a final rule strengthening
conversion standards and ensuring integrity in the conversion process.
59 FR 22725 and 59 FR 44615 respectively. The OTS experience has shown
that not all conversions are done in the best interests of the
customers.
Given that mutual savings associations currently seeking to
convert generally are well-capitalized, the OTS has become
increasingly concerned that the association's management may be
undertaking conversions for reasons other than the need for capital.
Some thrift insiders may be sacrificing the interests of their
associations and mutual account holders to acquire significant
amounts of conversion stock and other benefits as cheaply as
possible in the conversion process.
59 FR at 22729.
In view of these concerns, the OTS has adopted detailed rules
concerning conversions from mutual to stock savings associations,
designed to ensure fair evaluation and distribution of the stock of the
resulting institution. 12 CFR Sec. 563b. It is also interesting to note
that the OTS has severely limited other transactions. For example, with
very limited exceptions, the OTS rules require, in the case of a
combination of a savings association and a non savings association
institution (such as a credit union), that the resulting institution be
a savings association. 12 CFR 546.2.
FDIC also recently proposed regulations to tighten control over the
conversion process. 59 FR 30316 (June 13, 1994). FDIC concurred with
the need for OTS's interim final rule and found it ``necessary and
appropriate to adopt regulations similar to OTS Revisions.'' 59 FR at
30318. FDIC was particularly concerned with the same type of insider
abuses cited by OTS and found ``it is necessary to reexamine the
conversion process to explore whether existing economic value of a
converting mutual institution can be better distributed directly to
those who should receive it.'' 59 FR 30318.
The issuance of stock options at the conversion price, rather
than at the aftermarket price, which in recent years has been
substantially higher than the conversion price, creates the
impression that insider enrichment may be the main reason for the
conversion. * * * In fact, it may be an inherent conflict of
interest for management to decide to convert the bank to stock form
when, as part of the proposed conversion, management will reap
significant benefits.
59 FR at 30320.
NCUA cannot afford to ignore these warning signals. It is
significant and not a coincidence that the recent increase in
conversion solicitations from attorneys to credit unions is occurring
at the same time the banking regulators are clamping down on
institutions they regulate.
Interim Rule
The NCUA Board is issuing an interim final rule to immediately and
clearly establish NCUA's jurisdiction over all conversions by insured
credit unions. Upon further reflection, rather than place this rule in
part 708 which focuses on converting from federal to private or no
insurance, a new part 708a has been added to NCUA's Rules and
Regulations. This interim rule sets forth the requirement that all
mergers or conversions, involving one or more federally-insured credit
union, including those where the resulting institution is not a credit
union, must be approved by the NCUA Board. The rule also specifies that
all notices are subject to NCUA approval. Further, current part 708 has
been redesignated as part 708b to provide for a logical progression
from general to a more specific regulation.
Request for Additional Comment
The more NCUA studies these transactions, the more apparent it
becomes that the issues involved in converting to a mutual savings bank
or a stock institution are more complicated than they appear on their
face. A number of issues require further consideration and review.
Questions of insider preferences were addressed in the proposed
regulations. Insider benefits are clearly a major issue with respect to
the motivations for and objectivity of the conversion process. NCUA
questions whether directors and management officials involved in the
conversion process should be allowed to receive any personal financial
benefit from the transaction, other than that available to ordinary
members.
Even assuming adequate safeguards against insider preferences,
however, more basic questions exist concerning the authority for, and
propriety of, a decision by the existing members of the credit union to
convert the credit union to a stock corporation in order to distribute
among themselves the credit union's equity and future earnings power.
Some commenters have suggested that this is inherently unfair to the
overall field of membership, that is, the present and future membership
to be served by the credit union. In effect, these commenters have
suggested that the current members and officials hold the credit union
in trust for the benefit of the overall field of membership, including
present and future members. They question whether existing members
should be allowed to transform the credit union out of existence in
order to personally ``cash in'' on its economic value.
Other issues also require further study if healthy credit unions
are to be allowed to merge or convert to non-credit union status.
Included are how to properly appraise the value of the credit union for
purposes of issuing stock, how to fairly distribute the credit union's
value among members/shareholders (which may include share deposits made
in contemplation of merger), whether there should be a public comment
period on the proposed transaction, whether a majority of eligible
voting members must approve the proposed transaction (and if so, should
majority be defined as a simple majority or a super majority and if a
super majority, how should that be defined), and what post-merger or
post-conversion controls are needed to protect against improper insider
preferences after the transaction is completed.
Until the Board has fully addressed these issues and developed new
specific regulatory standards and procedures for mergers and
conversions to non-credit union status, it may, as a practical matter,
be difficult to take final action on such transactions. Boards of
directors of insured credit unions are urged to carefully consider
whether it is a wise expenditure of credit union funds to pursue these
transactions prior to the establishment of specific standards. Further,
the NCUA Board reiterates its previously expressed intent to hold
boards and management officials fully accountable for any waste of
credit union resources that is motivated by the prospect of personal
gain, rather than the best interests of the credit union and its
members.
The Board hopes to issue permanent rules with specific standards
and procedures within 60 to 90 days after the close of the comment
period on this interim final rule. In developing those rules, the Board
will consider the comments it received in response to its notice of
proposed rulemaking and any comments received in response to this
interim rule. In that connection, nine of the ten commenters previously
addressing the issue of a uniform member notice supported the creation
of a uniform notice. Also, two credit union trade groups on behalf of
state regulators and one state league expressed concern that NCUA may
attempt to usurp the state's power to make the final determination
where a state-chartered credit union is involved. As expressed in the
preamble to the notice of proposed rulemaking, ``the Board values its
positive working relationship with state credit union supervisors * *
*'' and ``will continue to cooperate with state regulators in cases
involving federally insured state chartered credit unions.'' NCUA
remains committed to working with the state regulators to study the
issues and develop any further rulemaking.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires the NCUA to prepare an
analysis to describe any significant economic impact any regulation may
have on a potential number of small credit unions (primarily those
under $1 million in assets). The final rule merely clarifies statutory
authority. Accordingly, the NCUA Board has determined that a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These amendments do not change the paperwork requirements.
Executive Order 12612
This rule applies to all federally insured credit unions. The rule
clarifies existing statutory requirements of NCUA Board approval of
certain transactions involving federally insured credit unions. The
NCUA Board has determined that this amendment is not likely to have any
direct effect on states, on the relationship between the states, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 708a
Bank deposit insurance, Credit unions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on September
16, 1994.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons set forth in the Preamble, pursuant to authority
granted in Section 205(b)(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C.
1785(b)(1)), the Board is adding a new regulation in 12 CFR part 708a.
1. Part 708a is added to read as follows:
PART 708a--MERGERS OR CONVERSIONS OF FEDERALLY-INSURED CREDIT
UNIONS: NCUA APPROVAL
Sec.
708a.1 NCUA Board approved.
708a.2 Notice to Members.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1766, 12 U.S.C. 1785.
Sec. 708a.1 NCUA Board approval.
Pursuant to Section 205(b)(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act, NCUA
Board approval is required in advance of any merger, consolidation,
insurance conversion, transfer of liabilities or other transaction
whereby a federally-insured credit union transfers all or any part of
its members' accounts to any institution that is not NCUSIF-insured or
assumes responsibility for all or any portion of accounts of an
institution that is not NCUSIF-insured. In transactions involving
federally-insured state chartered credit unions, the Board will
coordinate with the appropriate state regulatory authority.
Sec. 708a.2 Notice to members.
All notices to members will be preapproved by the NCUA Board.
Procedures and forms for the transactions where the remaining
institution continues to be a credit union--mergers involving both
federally-insured credit unions and non federally-insured credit unions
and conversion from federal insurance to nonfederal insurance--are set
forth in Part 708b, Subparts A, B and C.
Part 708 [Redesignated as Part 708b]
2. Part 708 is redesignated as part 708b.
[FR Doc. 94-23546 Filed 9-22-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.