Notice of Fund Availability (NOFA) for Supportive Housing for the Elderly

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing

Commissioner

[Docket No. N-94-3688; FR-3589-N-01]

Notice of Fund Availability (NOFA) for Supportive Housing for the

Elderly

AGENCY: Office of Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing

Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of fund availability for FY 94.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This NOFA announces HUD's funding for supportive housing for

the elderly. In the body of this document is information concerning the

following: (a) the purpose of the NOFA and information regarding

eligibility, submission requirements, available amounts, and selection

criteria and (b) application processing, including how to apply and how

selections will be made.

APPLICATION PACKAGE: The application package can be obtained from the

Multifamily Housing Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 6424, Rockville, MD 20850;

telephone 1-800-955-2232. A checklist of steps and exhibits involved in

the application process is included in the application package.

DATES: The deadline date for receipt of applications in response to

this NOFA is 4 p.m. local time on May 3, 1994. The application deadline

is firm as to date and hour. In the interest of fairness to all

applicants, HUD will not consider any application that is received

after the deadline. Sponsors should take this into account and submit

applications as early as possible to avoid risk brought about by

unanticipated delays or delivery-related problems. In particular,

Sponsors intending to mail applications must provide sufficient time to

permit delivery on or before the deadline date and hour. Acceptance by

a Post Office or private mailer does not constitute delivery. Facsimile

(FAX), COD, and postage due applications will not be accepted.

ADDRESSES: Applications must be delivered to the Director of the

Housing Development Division in the HUD Field Office for your

jurisdiction. A listing of HUD Field Offices, their addresses and

telephone numbers (including TDD telephone numbers) is attached as

appendix A to this NOFA. HUD will date and time stamp incoming

applications to evidence timely receipt, and upon request, provide the

applicant with an acknowledgement of receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The HUD Field Office for your

jurisdiction.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C.

3501-220), the information collection requirements have been assigned

OMB Control Number 2502-0267.

I. Purpose and Substantive Description

A. Authority

Section 801 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing

Act (NAHA) amended section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959. Section 202

was also amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992

(HCD Act of 1992). The Secretary is authorized to provide assistance to

private nonprofit organizations and nonprofit consumer cooperatives to

expand the supply of supportive housing for the elderly. The assistance

is provided as capital advances and contracts for project rental

assistance in accordance with 24 CFR part 889. This assistance may be

used to finance the construction or rehabilitation of a structure, or

acquisition of a structure from the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC),

to be used as supportive housing for the elderly in accordance with

part 889.

For supportive housing for the elderly, the Departments of Veterans

Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies

Appropriations Act, 1994, (Pub. L. 103-124, enacted October 28, 1993,

(Fiscal Year 1994 Appropriations Act) provides $1,158,000,000 for

capital advances, including amendments to capital advance contracts

(not procurement contracts), for housing for the elderly as authorized

by section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959, (as amended by the NAHA and

HCD Act of 1992), and for project rental assistance, and amendments to

contracts for project rental assistance, for supportive housing for the

elderly under section 202(c)(2) of the Housing Act of 1959, as amended.

Any unreserved balances provided in prior years for such purposes are

to be merged with amounts provided in the Fiscal Year 1994

Appropriations Act.

In accordance with an agreement between HUD and the Farmers Home

Administration (FmHA) which facilitates the coordination between the

two agencies in administering their respective rental assistance

programs, HUD is required to notify FmHA of applications for housing

assistance it receives. The purpose of this notification is to give

FmHA the opportunity to comment if it has concern about the demand for

additional assisted housing and possible harm to existing projects in

the same housing market area. HUD will consider the FmHA comments in

its review and project selection process.

B. Allocation Amounts

In accordance with 24 CFR part 791, the Assistant Secretary will

allocate the amounts available for capital advances for supportive

housing for the elderly. The Department reserves project rental

assistance funds sufficient for 20-year project rental assistance

contracts in support of the units selected for capital advances,

consistent with current operating cost standards.

The allocation formula for section 202 funds consists of a measure

of the number of one- and two-person elderly renter households with

incomes at or below the very low-income limit (50 percent of area

median family income, as determined by HUD, with an adjustment for

household size), which have housing deficiencies.

Applicants for capital advances in the area served by the

Washington, DC, Field Office are hereby put on notice that the capital

advance amount available to the DC Office, as stated in this NOFA, may

be reduced or eliminated due to ongoing legal proceedings occurring

between HUD and a prior-year applicant, and that the determination of

whether to reduce or eliminate those funds is entirely within the

discretion of HUD. If such action or actions are taken, a notice to

that effect will be published in the Federal Register.

Based on this formula, the Department has allocated the available

capital advance funds as shown on the following chart:

Fiscal Year 1994 Allocations for Supportive Housing for the Elderly--Fiscal year 1994 section 202 allocations

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Metropolitan Nonmetropolitan

Field Offices capital advance Units capital advance Units Totals capital Units

authority authority advance authority

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Region I:

*Boston........... $18,517,727 236 $3,091,858 40 $21,609,585 276

Hartford.......... 9,563,287 121 ................. ......... 9,563,287 121

Manchester........ 2,811,600 47 2,955,417 50 5,767,017 97

Providence........ 4,360,974 57 ................. ......... 4,360,974 57

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total I......... 35,253,588 461 6,047,275 90 41,300,863 551

Region II:

Buffalo........... 13,228,711 199 2,620,372 40 15,849,083 239

New York.......... 61,481,464 757 3,193,805 40 64,675,269 797

Newark............ 24,568,887 313 ................. ......... 24,568,887 313

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total II........ 99,279,062 1269 5,814,177 80 105,093,239 1349

Region III:

Baltimore......... 5,075,628 82 1,228,801 20 6,304,429 102

Charleston........ 2,383,393 43 ................. ......... 2,383,393 43

Philadelphia...... 12,412,192 180 2,036,856 30 14,449,048 210

Pittsburgh........ 7,037,242 118 1,170,676 20 8,207,918 138

Richmond.......... 4,519,456 85 1,838,717 35 6,358,173 120

D.C............... 6,249,461 94 ................. ......... 6,249,461 94

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total III....... 37,677,372 602 6,275,050 105 43,952,422 707

Region IV:

Atlanta........... 5,387,363 108 2,854,420 58 8,241,783 166

Birmingham........ 3,577,338 71 1,869,666 38 5,447,004 109

Caribbean......... 2,287,981 40 1,126,588 20 3,414,569 60

Columbia.......... 2,643,025 51 1,228,771 24 3,871,796 75

Greensboro........ 6,161,620 106 3,689,574 65 9,851,194 171

Jackson........... 3,094,819 64 ................. ......... 3,094,819 64

Jacksonville...... 19,372,418 353 2,158,938 40 21,531,356 393

Louisville........ 2,887,617 54 2,276,143 43 5,163,760 97

Knoxville......... 2,184,507 44 ................. ......... 2,184,507 44

Nashville......... 3,015,435 62 1,303,035 27 4,318,470 89

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total........... 50,612,123 953 16,507,135 315 67,119,258 1268

Region V:

Chicago........... 23,823,446 347 3,696,465 55 27,519,911 402

Cincinnati........ 4,780,204 84 ................. ......... 4,780,204 84

Cleveland......... 9,529,447 152 1,213,879 20 10,743,326 172

Columbus.......... 2,239,660 40 1,876,598 34 4,116,258 74

Detroit........... 9,609,231 152 1,237,936 20 10,847,167 172

Grand Rapids...... 2,466,015 46 1,310,147 25 3,776,162 71

Indianapolis...... 6,113,591 108 1,959,977 35 8,073,568 143

Milwaukee......... 7,061,812 115 2,965,893 49 10,027,705 164

Minn-St. Paul..... 6,282,998 98 2,802,188 44 9,085,186 142

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total V......... 71,906,404 1142 17,063,083 282 88,969,487 1424

Region VI:

Fort Worth (NM)... 7,588,323 148 2,530,768 50 10,119,091 198

Houston........... 4,884,422 94 ................. ......... 4,884,422 94

Little Rock....... 2,376,180 52 884,523 20 3,260,703 72

New Orleans....... 4,152,676 83 1,066,812 22 5,219,488 105

Oklahoma.......... 2,731,249 56 959,293 20 3,690,542 76

San Antonio....... 2,925,297 59 973,098 20 3,898,395 79

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total VI........ 24,658,147 492 6,414,494 132 31,072,641 624

Region VII:

Des Moines........ 2,846,598 55 1,010,775 20 3,857,373 75

Kansas City....... 4,232,977 80 2,040,609 40 6,273,586 120

Omaha............. ................. ......... 2,000,654 40 2,000,654 40

St. Louis......... 2,556,300 43 1,184,487 20 3,740,787 63

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total VII....... 9,635,875 178 6,236,525 120 15,872,400 298

Region VIII:

Denver............ 5,927,630 114 2,990,131 60 8,917,761 174

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total VIII...... 5,927,630 114 2,990,131 60 8,917,761 174

Region IX:

Honolulu (Guam)... ................. ......... 2,258,519 20 2,258,519 20

Los Angeles....... 40,649,178 549 2,913,050 40 43,562,228 589

Phoenix........... 3,263,678 65 984,583 20 4,248,261 85

Sacramento........ 4,078,500 62 1,289,025 20 5,367,525 82

San Francisco..... 22,033,435 280 3,030,757 40 25,064,192 320

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total IX........ 70,024,791 956 10,475,934 140 80,500,725 1096

Region X:

Anchorage......... ................. ......... 2,260,745 20 2,260,745 20

Portland.......... 4,275,182 76 1,625,961 30 5,901,143 106

Seattle........... 7,104,051 108 1,296,765 20 8,400,816 128

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total X......... 11,379,233 184 5,183,471 70 16,562,704 254

National total.. 416,354,225 6351 83,007,275 1394 499,361,500 7745

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Eligibility

The only eligible applicants under this program are private,

nonprofit organizations and nonprofit consumer cooperatives. Neither a

public body nor an instrumentality of a public body is eligible to

participate in the program. No organization shall participate as

Sponsor or Co-sponsor in the filing of application(s) for a capital

advance in a single region in this fiscal year in excess of that

necessary to finance the construction, rehabilitation or acquisition

(acquisition permitted only with RTC properties) of 300 units of

housing and related facilities for the elderly. This limit shall apply

to organizations that participate as Co-sponsors regardless of whether

the Co-sponsors are affiliated or non-affiliated entities. In addition,

the national limit for any one applicant is 10 percent of the total

units allocated in all Regions. Affiliated entities which submit

separate applications shall be deemed to be a single entity for the

purposes of these limits. No single application may propose more than

the number of units allocated to a Field Office or 125 units, whichever

is less. Reservations for projects will not be approved for less than

40 units in metropolitan areas or less than 5 units in nonmetropolitan

areas.

D. Initial Screening, Technical Processing and Selection Criteria

1. Initial Screening

Applications for section 202 capital advances that are received by

HUD at the appropriate address by 4 p.m. local time on May 3, 1994 will

be reviewed to determine if all parts of the application are included.

HUD will not review the content of the application as part of initial

screening. Deficiency letters will be sent informing Sponsors of any

missing parts of the application. Sponsors must correct such

deficiencies within 14 calendar days from the date of the deficiency

letter. The deficiency letter is to be sent by certified mail. Any

document requested as a result of the initial screening may be executed

or prepared within the deficiency period, except for Forms HUD-92015-

CAs, Articles of Incorporation, IRS exemption rulings, Forms SF-424,

Board Resolution committing the minimum capital investment, and site

control documents (all of these excepted items must be dated no later

than the application deadline date).

2. Technical Processing.

All applications will be placed in technical processing upon

receipt of the response to the deficiency letter or at the end of the

14-day period. All applications will undergo a complete analysis. If a

reviewer finds that clarification is needed to complete the review or

an exhibit is missing that was not requested after initial screening,

the reviewer shall immediately advise the Multifamily Housing

Representative who will: (a) Request, by telephone, that the Sponsor

submit the information within five (5) working days, and (b) follow up

by certified letter. Communications must be attached to the technical

review and findings memorandum. As part of this analysis, HUD will

conduct its environmental review in accordance with 24 CFR part 50.

Examples of reasons for technical processing rejection include an

ineligible Sponsor, ineligible population to be served, lack of legal

capacity, lack of site control and unacceptable site based upon a site

visit. The Secretary will not reject an application based on technical

processing without giving notice of that rejection with all rejection

reasons, and affording the applicant an opportunity to appeal. An

applicant will be afforded 14 calendar days from the date of HUD's

written notice to appeal a technical rejection to the Field Office. The

Field Office must respond within 5 working days to the Sponsor. The

Field Office shall make a determination on an appeal prior to making

its selection recommendations. All applications will be either rated or

technically rejected at the end of technical processing.

Technical processing will also assure that if the Sponsor has been

found by a court or by a Federal, State, or local agency, in

noncompliance with any of the statutes, regulations, or other

requirements listed in the civil rights certification

(Sec. 889.270(b)(8)(i)), HUD will obtain from the Sponsor a statement

of the actions taken to correct that noncompliance. There must be no

pending civil rights suits against the Sponsor instituted by the

Department of Justice and no pending administrative actions for civil

rights violations instituted by HUD. Moreover, there must not be a

deferral of the processing of applications from the Sponsor imposed by

HUD under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Department's

implementing regulations (24 CFR 1.8), procedures (HUD Handbook

8040.1), and the Attorney General's Guidelines (28 CFR 50.3); or under

section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Department's

implementing regulations (24 CFR 8.57), and the Americans with

Disabilities Act of 1990.

Upon completion of technical processing, all acceptable

applications will be rated according to the selection criteria in

Sec. 889.300(d) (also below in I.D.3). Applications which have a total

score of 50 points or more will be eligible for selection and will be

placed in rank order.

3. Selection Criteria

Applications for section 202 capital advances that successfully

complete technical processing will be rated using the following

selection criteria:

(a) In determining the Sponsor's ability to develop and operate the

proposed housing on a long-term basis, consider the following (50

points maximum):

(1) The scope, extent and quality of the Sponsor's experience in

providing housing or related services to those proposed to be served by

the project and the scope of the proposed project (i.e., number of

units, services, relocation costs, development, and operation) in

relationship to the Sponsor's demonstrated development and management

capacity. (32 points);

(2) The scope, extent and quality of the Sponsor's experience in

providing housing or related services to minority persons or families

(5 points);

(3) The scope, extent and quality of the Sponsor's experience in

providing opportunities for minority and women-owned business

enterprises participation (3 points); and

(4) The extent of local community support for the Sponsor's

activities, including previous experience in serving the area where the

project is to be located, and Sponsor's demonstrated ability to enlist

volunteers and local funds (10 points);

(b) In determining the need for supportive housing for the elderly

in the area to be served and the suitability of the site, consider (25

points maximum):

(1) The extent of the need for the project in the area based on a

determination by the Field Office. This determination will be made

taking into consideration the Sponsor's evidence of need in the area

based on the guidelines in Sec. 889.270(b)(17), as well as other

economic, demographic and housing market data available to the Field

Office. The data could include the availability of existing Federally

assisted housing (HUD and FmHA) (e.g., considering availability and

vacancy rates of public housing) for the elderly and current occupancy

in such facilities, Federally assisted housing for the elderly under

construction or for which fund reservations have been issued, and in

accordance with an agreement between HUD and the FmHA, comments from

the FmHA on the demand for additional assisted housing and the possible

harm to existing projects in the same housing market area (8 points).

(2) The proximity or accessibility of the site to shopping, medical

facilities, transportation, places of worship, recreational facilities,

places of employment, and other necessary services to the intended

occupants, adequacy of utilities and streets, freedom of the site from

adverse environmental conditions, compliance with site and neighborhood

standards (10 points); and

(3) Suitability of the site from the standpoint of promoting a

greater choice of housing opportunities for minority elderly persons/

families (7 points);

(c) In determining adequacy of the provision of supportive services

and of the proposed facility consider (25 points maximum):

(1) The extent to which the proposed design will meet the special

physical needs of elderly persons (4 points);

(2) The extent to which the proposed size and unit mix of the

housing will enable the Sponsor to manage and operate the housing

efficiently and ensure that the provision of supportive services will

be accomplished in an economical fashion (4 points);

(3) The extent to which the proposed design of the housing will

accommodate the provision of supportive services that are expected to

be needed, initially and over the useful life of the housing, by the

category or categories of elderly persons the housing is intended to

serve (2 points);

(4) The extent to which the proposed supportive services meet the

identified needs of the residents (8 points); and

(5) The extent to which the Sponsor demonstrated that the

identified supportive services will be provided on a consistent long-

term basis (7 points).

II. Application Process

All applications for Section 202 capital advances submitted by

eligible Sponsors must be filed with the appropriate HUD Field Office

receiving an allocation and must meet the requirements of this Notice.

No application will be accepted after 4 p.m. local time on May 3, 1994,

unless that date and time is extended by a Notice published in the

Federal Register. Applications received after that date and time will

not be accepted, even if postmarked by the deadline date. Applications

submitted by facsimile are not acceptable.

Immediately upon publication of this NOFA, if names have not

already been provided to the Multifamily Housing Clearinghouse, Field

Offices shall notify elderly and minority media, all persons and

organizations on their mailing lists and minority and other

organizations within their jurisdiction involved in housing and

community development and groups with special interest in housing for

elderly households.

Organizations interested in applying for a section 202 capital

advance should contact the Multifamily Housing Clearinghouse at 1-800-

955-2232 for a copy of the application package, and advise the

appropriate Field Office whether they wish to attend the workshop

described below. HUD encourages minority organizations to participate

in this program as Sponsors. Field Offices will advise all

organizations on their mailing list of the date, time and place of

workshops at which the Section 202 Program will be explained.

HUD strongly recommends that prospective applicants attend the

local Field Office workshop. Interested persons with disabilities

should contact the Field Office to assure that any necessary

arrangements can be made for them to enable their attendance and

participation in the workshop. While strongly urged to do so, if

Sponsors cannot attend a workshop, Application Packages can be obtained

from the Multifamily Housing Clearinghouse (see address and telephone

number under SUMMARY above). However, Sponsors must contact the

appropriate Field Office with any questions regarding the submission of

applications and for any additional application requirements.

At the workshops, application procedures and requirements will be

explained. Also, concerns such as local market conditions, building

codes, historic preservation, floodplain management, displacement and

relocation, zoning and housing costs will be addressed.

III. Application Submission Requirements

A. Application

Each application shall include all of the information, materials,

forms, and exhibits listed in section III. B. below, with the exception

of applications submitted by Sponsors selected for a Section 202 fund

reservation within the last three funding cycles, and must be indexed

and tabbed. Previously selected Section 202 Sponsors are not required

to submit the information described in B. 2. (a), (b) and (c) below

(Exhibit 2, a., b., and c. of the application which are the articles of

incorporation, (or other organizational documents), by-laws, and the

IRS tax exemption, respectively). The Field Office will base its

determination of the eligibility of a new Sponsor for a reservation of

section 202 capital advance funds on the information provided in the

application. Field Offices will verify a Sponsor's indication of

previous HUD approval by checking the project number and approval

status with the appropriate Field Office. If there has been a change in

any of the eligibility documents since its previous HUD approval, the

Sponsor must submit the updated information in its application.

In addition to this relief of paperwork burden in preparing

applications, applicants will be able to utilize information and

exhibits previously prepared for prior applications under section 202,

section 811 or other funding programs. Examples of exhibits that may be

readily adapted or amended to decrease the burden of application

preparation include, among others, those on previous participation in

the section 202 or section 811 programs; applicant experience in

provision of housing and services; supportive services plan; community

ties, and experience serving minorities.

B. General Application Requirements

1. Form HUD-92015-CA, Application for Section 202 Supportive

Housing Capital Advance.

2. Evidence of each Sponsor's legal status as a private, nonprofit

organization or nonprofit consumer cooperative, including the

following:

(a) Articles of Incorporation, constitution, or other

organizational documents;

(b) By-laws;

(c) IRS tax exemption ruling (this must be submitted by all

Sponsors, including churches). A nonprofit organization organized in

the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and exempt from income taxation under

Puerto Rico law, or a consumer cooperative that is tax exempt under

State law, has never been liable for payment of Federal income taxes,

and does not pay patronage dividends may be exempt from the requirement

set out in the previous sentence if they are not eligible for tax

exemption; and

(d) Resolution of the board, duly certified by an officer, that no

officer or director of the Sponsor or Owner has or will have any

financial interest in any contract with the Owner or in any firm or

corporation which has or will have a contract with the Owner and which

includes a current listing of all duly qualified and sitting officers

and directors by title and the beginning and ending date of each

person's term.

[Note: Sponsors who have received a section 202 fund reservation

within the last three funding cycles are not required to submit the

documents described in (a), (b), and (c), above. Instead, sponsors

must submit the project number of the most recently selected

application and the field office to which it was submitted. If there

have been any modifications or additions to the subject documents,

indicate such, and submit the new material.]

3. CHAS certification. The Sponsor must submit a certification by

the jurisdiction in which the proposed project will be located that the

Sponsor's application is consistent with the jurisdiction's HUD-

approved CHAS for FY 1994. The certification must be made by the unit

of general local government if it is required to have, or has, a

complete CHAS. Otherwise the certification may be made by the State, or

if the project will be located in a unit of general local government

authorized to use an abbreviated strategy, by the unit of general local

government if it is willing to prepare such a CHAS.

All CHAS certifications must be made by the public official

responsible for submitting the CHAS to HUD. All CHAS certifications

must be submitted as part of the application by the application

submission deadline set forth in this NOFA, except as provided in the

next paragraph. The required CHAS must therefore have been submitted

more than 60 days before the application submission deadline, since HUD

has 60 days to review and approve the CHAS. Where the certification of

consistency is permitted to be submitted after the application

submission deadline, as described in the next paragraph, the CHAS must

be submitted for approval in time for the certification to be made by

the later date. In no event will an application be considered if the

CHAS has not been submitted for approval by the application submission

deadline.

If the required certification will be made by a unit of general

local government with respect to an abbreviated strategy, and such CHAS

has been submitted by the application submission deadline but has not

yet been approved by HUD, the deadline will not be applied to the

certification for consistency. Instead, the application must include a

written statement from the public official responsible for submitting

the CHAS that the jurisdiction has submitted an abbreviated strategy

for FY 1994 for HUD approval and that the application is consistent

with the CHAS. If HUD approved the CHAS, the required certification

that the application is consistent with a HUD-approved CHAS for FY 1994

must be submitted before June 2, 1994. An application will not be

selected for funding unless the CHAS is approved and the required

certification is made by June 2, 1994. The CHAS regulations are

published in 24 CFR part 91.

4. E.O. 12372. A certification that the Sponsor has submitted a

copy of its applications, if required, to the State agency (single

point of contact) for State review in accordance with Executive Order

12372.

5. SF-424. A certification on SF-424, Application for Federal

Assistance, that the Sponsor(s) is not delinquent on the repayment of

any Federal debt.

6. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities. If the amount applied for is

greater than $100,000, the certification with regard to lobbying

required by 24 CFR part 87 must be included. If the amount applied for

is greater than $100,000 and the applicant has made or has agreed to

make any payment using nonappropriated funds for lobbying activity, as

described in 24 CFR part 87, the submission must also include SF-LLL,

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities. The applicant determines if the

submission of the SF-LLL form is applicable.

7. A statement that (a) identifies all persons (families,

individuals, businesses and nonprofit organizations identified by race/

minority group, and status as owners or tenants) occupying the property

on the date of submission of the application for a capital advance; (b)

indicates the estimated cost of relocation payments and other services,

and (c) identifies the staff organization that will carry out the

relocation activities.

[Note: If any of the relocation costs will be funded from

sources other than the section 202 capital advance, the sponsor must

provide evidence of a firm commitment of these funds. When

evaluating applications, HUD will consider the total cost of

proposals (i.e., cost of site acquisition, relocation, construction

and other project costs).]

8. Additional Certifications.

(a) A certification of the Sponsor(s)' intent to comply with

section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and the

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 8; the Fair Housing Act (42

U.S.C. 3600-3619) and the implementing regulations at 24 CFR parts 100,

108, 109, and 110; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.

2000d) and the implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 1; section 3 of

the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) and the

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 135; the Age Discrimination Act

of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101-6107) and the implementing regulations at 24

CFR part 146; Executive Order 11246 (as amended) and the implementing

regulations at 41 CFR chapter 60; the regulations implementing

Executive Order 11063 (Equal Opportunity in Housing) at 24 CFR part

107; the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) to

the extent applicable; the affirmative fair housing marketing

requirements of 24 CFR part 200, subpart M and the implementing

regulations at 24 CFR part 108; and other applicable Federal, State and

local laws prohibiting discrimination and promoting equal opportunity.

(b) A certification that the Sponsor(s) will comply with the

requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act.

(c) A certification that the project will comply with HUD's design

and cost standards, the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards and

HUD's implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 40, Section 504 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and HUD's implementing regulations at 24 CFR

part 8, and for covered multifamily dwellings designed and constructed

for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, the design and construction

requirements of the Fair Housing Act and HUD's implementing regulations

at 24 CFR part 100, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

(d) A certification by the Sponsor(s) that it will comply (or has

complied) with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the

Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies

Act of 1970, as amended (URA), implemented by regulations at 49 CFR

part 24, and 24 CFR 889.265(e).

(e) A certification by the Sponsor(s) that it will form an Owner

(as defined in Sec. 889.105) after the issuance of the capital advance,

will cause the Owner to file a request for determination of eligibility

and a request for capital advance under Sec. 889.300, and will provide

sufficient resources to the Owner to insure the development and long-

term operation of the project, including capitalizing the Owner at

conditional commitment processing in an amount sufficient to meet its

obligations in connection with the project.

9. A description of Sponsor's purposes and activities, ties to the

community and minority support and how long it has been in existence

(include any additional related information).

10. A description of any other rental housing projects and/or

medical facilities, sponsored, owned and operated by the Sponsor

including a description of experience in providing housing and/or

medical facilities to the elderly and/or families and minorities.

11. A description of the Sponsor's past or current involvement in

any programs other than housing (including its provision of services)

that demonstrates the Sponsor's management capabilities and experience,

including a description of the Sponsor's experience in serving the

elderly and/or families and minorities.

12. A description of the Sponsor's experience in contracting with

minority and women-owned businesses, including a summary of the total

amount awarded in each of the two categories for the preceding three

years and the percentage that amount represents of the total contracts

awarded by the Sponsor in the relevant time period.

13. A certified Board Resolution, acknowledging responsibilities of

sponsorship, long-term support of the project(s), willingness of

Sponsor to assist the Owner to develop, own, manage and provide

appropriate services in connection with the proposed project, and that

it reflects the will of its membership. Also, evidence, in the form of

a certified Board Resolution, of the Sponsor's willingness to fund the

estimated start-up expenses, the Minimum Capital Investment (one-half

of one percent of the HUD-approved capital advance, not to exceed

$10,000, if non-affiliated with National Sponsor; one-half of one

percent of the HUD-approved capital advance, not to exceed $25,000, for

all other Sponsors; see 889.250), and the estimated cost of any

amenities or features (and operating costs related thereto) which would

not be covered by the approved capital advance.

14. A list of the applications, if any, the Sponsor has submitted

or is planning to submit to any other Field Office in response to this

NOFA or the NOFA for Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities

(published elsewhere in today's Federal Register). Indicate by Field

Office, the proposed location by city and State, and the number of

units requested for each application. A list of all FY 1993 and prior

year projects to which the Sponsor(s) is a party, identified by project

number and Field Office, which have not been finally closed.

15. HUD-2880, Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/Update Report,

including Social Security Numbers and Employee Identification Numbers.

16. Evidence of need for supportive housing. A description of the

category or categories of elderly persons the housing is intended to

serve and evidence demonstrating sustained effective demand for

supportive housing for that population in the market area to be served,

taking into consideration the occupancy and vacancy conditions in

existing Federally assisted housing for the elderly (HUD and FmHA)

(e.g., public housing), state or local data on the limitations in

activities of daily living among the elderly in the area, aging in

place in existing assisted rentals; trends in demographic changes in

elderly population and households; the numbers of income eligible

elderly households by size, tenure and housing condition, and the types

of supportive services arrangements currently available in the area and

the utilization of such services as evidenced by data from local social

service agencies or agencies on aging.

17. Evidence of site control and permissive zoning.

(a) Evidence that the Sponsor has entered into a legally binding

option agreement to buy or lease the proposed site; or has a copy of

the contract of sale for the site, a deed, long-term leasehold, a

request with all supporting documentation, submitted either prior to or

with the Application for Capital Advance, for a partial release of a

site covered by a mortgage under a HUD program or other evidence of

legal ownership of the site (including properties to be acquired from

the Resolution Trust Corporation). The option agreement period must

extend through the end of the current fiscal year and contain a renewal

provision so that the option can be renewed for at least an additional

six months. The Sponsor must also identify any restrictive covenants,

including reverter clauses. In the case of a site to be acquired from a

public body, evidence that the public body possesses clear title to the

site, and has entered into a legally binding agreement to lease or

convey the site to the Sponsor after it receives and accepts a notice

of Section 202 capital advance and identification of any restrictive

covenants, including reverter clauses. However, in localities where HUD

determines the time constraints of the funding round will not permit

all of the required official actions (e.g., approval of Community

Planning Boards) which are necessary to convey publicly-owned sites, a

letter in the application from the Mayor or Director of the appropriate

local agency indicating approval of conveyance of the site contingent

upon the necessary approval action is acceptable and may be approved by

the Field Office if it has satisfactory experience with timely

conveyance of sites from that public body. In such cases, documentation

shall also include a copy of the public body's evidence of ownership

and identification of any restrictive covenants, including reverter

clauses. For properties to be acquired from the RTC, include a copy of

the RTC prepared Transaction Screen Checklist or Phase I Environmental

Site Assessment, and applicable documentation, per the RTC

Environmental Guidelines.

[Note: A proposed project site may not be acquired or optioned

from a general contractor (or its affiliate) which will construct

the section 202 project or from any other development team member.]

(b) Evidence that the project as proposed is permissible under

applicable zoning ordinances or regulations, or a statement of the

proposed action required to make the proposed project permissible and

the basis for belief that the proposed action will be completed

successfully before the submission of the commitment application (e.g.,

a summary of the results of any recent requests for rezoning on land in

similar zoning classifications and the time required for such rezoning,

preliminary indications of acceptability from zoning bodies, etc.).

18. Narrative description of site and area surrounding the site,

characteristics of neighborhood, how the site will promote greater

housing opportunities for minorities, and any other information that

impacts on the suitability of the site for the elderly.

19. A map showing the location of the site and the racial

composition of the neighborhood, with the area of racial concentration

delineated.

20. Provision of supportive services and proposed facility.

(a) A detailed description of the supportive services proposed to

be provided to the anticipated occupancy.

(b) Form HUD 92013E, Supplemental Application Processing Form--

Housing for the Elderly. Identify all supportive services, if any, to

be provided to the persons occupying such housing.

(c) A description of public or private sources of assistance that

reasonably could be expected to fund the proposed services.

(d) The manner in which such services will be provided to such

persons (i.e., on or off-site), including, whether a service

coordinator will facilitate the adequate provision of such services,

and how the services will meet the identified needs of the residents.

(e) Narrative description of the building design including a

description of any special design features and community space, and how

this design will facilitate the delivery of services in an economical

fashion and accommodate the changing needs of the residents over the

next 10-20 years.

(f) Describe if and how the project will promote energy efficiency

and, if applicable, innovative construction or rehabilitation methods

or technologies to be used that will promote efficient construction.

IV. Other Matters

A. Environmental Impact

A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment

has been made in accordance with HUD regulations that implement section

102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C.

4332. The Finding of No Significant Impact is available for public

inspection during business hours in the Office of the Rules Docket

Clerk, Office of General Counsel, room 10276, Department of Housing and

Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410.

B. Federalism Executive Order

The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under section 6(a)

of Executive Order No. 12612, Federalism, has determined that this NOFA

does not have substantial direct effects on States or their political

subdivisions, or on the relationship between the Federal government and

the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among

the various levels of government. This NOFA merely notifies the public

of the availability of capital advances and project rental assistance

for supportive housing for the elderly.

C. Family Executive Order

The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under Executive

Order No. 12606, The Family, has determined that this NOFA does not

significantly affect family formation, maintenance, or general well-

being, and, thus, is not subject to review under the order.

D. Accountability in the Provision of HUD Assistance

HUD has promulgated a final rule to implement section 102 of the

Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (HUD

Reform Act). The final rule is codified at 24 CFR part 12. Section 102

contains a number of provisions that are designed to ensure greater

accountability and integrity in the provision of certain types of

assistance administered by HUD. On January 14, 1992, HUD published at

57 FR 1942, additional information that gave the public (including

applicants for, and recipients of, HUD assistance) further information

on the implementation, public access, and disclosure requirements of

section 102. The documentation, public access, and disclosure

requirements of section 102 are applicable to assistance awarded under

this NOFA as follows:

1. Documentation and Public Access

HUD will ensure documentation and other information regarding each

application submitted pursuant to this NOFA are sufficient to indicate

the basis upon which assistance was provided or denied. This material,

including any letters of support, will be made available for public

inspection for a five-year period beginning not less than 30 days after

the award of the assistance. Material will be made available in

accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and HUD's

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 15. In addition, HUD will

include the recipients of assistance pursuant to this NOFA in its

quarterly Federal Register notice of all recipients of HUD assistance

awarded on a competitive basis. (See 24 CFR 12.14(a) and 12.16(b), and

the notice published in the Federal Register on January 16, 1992 (57 FR

1942), for further information on these requirements.)

2. Disclosures

HUD will make available to the public for five years all applicant

disclosure reports (HUD Form 2880) submitted in connection with this

NOFA. Update reports (also Form 2880) will be made available along with

the applicant disclosure reports, but in no case for a period less than

three years. All reports--both applicant disclosures and updates--will

be made available in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5

U.S.C. 552) and HUD's implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 15. (See

24 CFR subpart C, and the notice published in the Federal Register on

January 16, 1992 (57 FR 1942), for further information on these

disclosure requirements.)

E. Documentation and Public Access Requirements: HUD Reform Act

HUD will ensure that documentation and other information regarding

each application submitted pursuant to this NOFA are sufficient to

indicate the basis upon which assistance was provided or denied. This

material, including any letters of support, will be made available for

public inspection for a five-year period beginning not less than 30

days after the award of the assistance. Material will be made available

in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and

HUD's implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 15. In addition, HUD will

include the recipients of assistance pursuant to this NOFA in its

quarterly Federal Register notice of all recipients of HUD assistance

awarded on a competitive basis. (See CFR 12.14(a) and 12.16(b), and the

notice published in the Federal Register on January 16, 1992 (57 FR

1942), for further information on these requirements.)

F. Section 103

HUD's regulation implementing section 103 of the Department of

Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 was published May 13,

1991 (56 FR 22088) and became effective on June 12, 1991. That

regulation, codified as 24 CFR part 4, applies to the funding

competition announced today. The requirements of the rule continue to

apply until the announcement of the selection of successful applicants.

HUD employees involved in the review of applications and in the

making of funding decisions are restrained by part 4 from providing

advance information to any person (other than an authorized employee of

HUD) concerning funding decisions, or from otherwise giving any

applicant an unfair competitive advantage. Persons who apply for

assistance in this competition should confine their inquiries to the

subject areas permitted under 24 CFR part 4.

Applicants who have questions should contact the HUD Office of

Ethics (202) 708-3815 (TDD/Voice). (This is not a toll-free number.)

The Office of Ethics can provide information of a general nature to HUD

employees, as well. However, a HUD employee who has specific program

questions, such as whether particular subject matter can be discussed

with persons outside the Department, should contact his or her Regional

or Field Office Counsel, or Headquarters counsel for the program to

which the question pertains.

G. Lobbying

Section 13 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act

(42 U.S.C. 3537b) contains two provisions dealing with efforts to

influence HUD's decisions with respect to financial assistance. The

first imposes disclosure requirements on those who are typically

involved in these efforts--those who pay others to influence the award

of assistance or the taking of a management action by the Department

and those who are paid to provide the influence. The second restricts

the payment of fees to those who are paid to influence the award of HUD

assistance, if the fees are tied to the number of housing units

received or are based on the amount of assistance received, or if they

are contingent upon the receipt of assistance.

Section 13 was implemented by final rule published in the Federal

Register on May 17, 1991 (56 FR 22912). If readers are involved in any

efforts to influence the Department in these ways, they are urged to

read the final rule, particularly the examples contained in Appendix A

of the rule.

Any questions regarding the rule should be directed to the

Director, Office of Ethics, room 2158, Department of Housing and Urban

Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410. Telephone:

(202) 708-3815 (TDD/Voice). (This is not a toll-free number.) Forms

necessary for compliance with the rule may be obtained from the local

HUD office.

H. Prohibition Against Lobbying Activities

The use of funds awarded under this NOFA is subject to the

disclosure requirements and prohibitions of Section 319 of the

Department of Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for

Fiscal Year 1990 (31 U.S.C. 1352) (the ``Byrd Amendment'') and the

implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 87. These authorities prohibit

recipients of federal contracts, grants or loans from using

appropriated funds for lobbying the Executive or Legislative Branches

of the Federal Government in connection with a specific contract, grant

or loan. The prohibition also covers the awarding of contracts, grants,

cooperative agreements or loans unless the recipient has made an

acceptable certification regarding lobbying. Under 24 CFR part 87,

applicants, recipients and subrecipients of assistance exceeding

$100,000 must certify that no federal funds have been or will be spent

on lobbying activities in connection with the assistance.

I. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program

The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program title and number

is 14.181, Housing for the Elderly or Handicapped.

Authority: Section 202, Housing Act of 1959, as amended (12

U.S.C. 1701q), Section 7(d), Department of Housing and Urban

Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3535(d)).

Dated: January 12, 1994.

Nicolas P. Retsinas,

Assistant Secretary for Housing, Federal Housing Commissioner.

Appendix A--HUD Field Offices

Regional and Field Office Directory

HUD Field Offices

Region I

Boston, Massachusetts Regional Office

Jeanne McHallam

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Boston Regional Office

Room 375

Thomas P. O'Neill, Jr. Federal Building

10 Causeway Street,

Boston, Massachusetts 02222-1092

(617) 565-5234 FAX (617) 565-5257

Hartford, Connecticut Office (A)

Ronald Black

Director, Housing Development

HUD-Hartford Office

330 Main Street

Hartford, Connecticut 06106-1860

(203) 240-4523 FAX (203) 240-4674

Manchester, New Hampshire Office (B)

Loren W. Cole

Director, Housing Development

HUD-Manchester Office

Norris Cotton Federal Building

275 Chestnut Street

Manchester, New Hampshire 03103-2487

(603) 666-7681 FAX (603) 666-7736

Providence, Rhode Island Office (B)

Michael Dziok

Director, Housing Development

HUD-Providence Office

330 John O. Pastore Federal Building

and U.S. Post Office--Kennedy Plaza

Providence, Rhode Island 02902-1785

(401) 528-5351 FAX (401) 528-5312

Region II

New York Regional Office

Martin Sckalor

Director, Housing Development

Regional Housing Commissioner

HUD-New York Regional Office

26 Federal Plaza

New York, New York 10278-0068

(212) 264-6500 FAX (212) 264-0246

Buffalo, New York Office (A)

Robert Rifenberick

Director, Housing Development

HUD-Buffalo Office

5th Floor

Lafayette Court

465 Main Street

Buffalo, New York 14203-1780

(716) 846-5755 FAX (716) 846-5752

Newark, New Jersey Office (A)

Geraldine McGann

Director, Housing Development

HUD-Newark Office

1 Newark Center

Newark, New Jersey 07102-5504

(201) 622-7900 Ext. 3102 FAX (201) 645-2323

Region III

Philadelphia Regional Office

Michael J. Perretta

Director, Housing Development

HUD-Philadelphia Regional Office

Liberty Square Building

105 South 7th Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106-3392

(215) 597-2560 FAX (215) 597-9627

Baltimore, Maryland Office (A)

Candace L. Simms

Director, Housing Development

HUD-Baltimore Office

5th Floor

City Crescent Building

10 South Howard Street

Baltimore, Maryland 21201-2505

(410) 962-2520 FAX (410) 962-4947

Charleston, West Virginia Office (B)

Robert J. Gibson

Chief, Housing Development

HUD-Charleston Office

Suite 708

405 Capitol Street

Charleston, West Virginia 25301-1795

(304) 347-7000 FAX (304) 347-7050

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Office (A)

Edward Palombizio

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Pittsburgh Office

412 Old Post Office Courthouse

7th Avenue & Grant Street

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219

(412) 644-6428 FAX (412) 644-6499

Richmond, Virginia Office (A)

Charlie Famuliner

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Richmond Office

The 3600 Centre

3600 West Broad Street

P. O. Box 90331

Richmond, Virginia 23230-0331

(804) 278-4507 FAX (804) 771-2314

Washington, DC Office (A)

Felicia Williams

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Washington, DC Office

Suite 300

Union Center Plaza, Phase II

820 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20002-4205

(202) 275-9200 FAX (202) 275-0779

Region IV

Atlanta, Georgia Regional Office

Gayle F. Burbidge

Director--Housing Development

Richard B. Russell Federal Building

75 Spring Street, S.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3388

(404) 331-5136 FAX (404) 331-0845

Birmingham, Alabama Office (A)

Martha K. Andus

Acting Director--Housing Development

HUD-Birmingham Office

Suite 300

Beacon Ridge Tower

600 Beacon Parkway West

Birmingham, Alabama 35209-3144

(205) 290-7617 FAX (205) 290-7593

Caribbean Office (A)

Alberto Rosado

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Caribbean Office

New San Juan Office Building

159 Carlos E. Chardon Avenue

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-1804

(809) 766-6121 FAX (809) 766-5995

Columbia, South Carolina Office (A)

Keene R. LaFountain

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Columbia Office

Strom Thurmond Federal Building

1835 Assembly Street

Columbia, South Carolina 29201-2480

(803) 765-5592 FAX (803) 765-5515

Greensboro, North Carolina (A)

Daniel A. McCanless

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Greensboro Office

Koger Building

2306 West Meadowview Road

Greensboro, North Carolina 27407-3707

(919) 547-4001 FAX (919) 547-4015

Jackson, Mississippi Office (A)

Reba G. Cook

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Jackson Office

Dr. A.H. McCoy Federal Building

100 West Capitol Street, Room 910

Jackson, Mississippi 39269-1096

(601) 965-5308 FAX (601) 965-4773

Jacksonville, Florida Office (A)

Donald E. Odenthal

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Jacksonville Office

Suite 2200

Southern Bell Tower

301 West Bay Street

Jacksonville, Florida 32202-5121

(904) 232-2626 FAX (904) 232-3759

Knoxville, Tennessee Office (A)

John E. Robbins

Director--Housing Management

HUD-Knoxville Office

Third Floor

John J. Duncan Federal Building

710 Locust Street, S.W.

Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-2526

(615) 545-4384 FAX (615) 545-4569

Louisville, Kentucky Office (A)

David A. Powell

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Louisville Office

601 West Broadway

P.O. Box 1044

Louisville, Kentucky 40201-1044

(502) 582-5251 FAX (502) 582-6074

Nashville, Tennessee Office (B)

Ed M. Phillips

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Nashville Office

Suite 200

251 Cumberland Bend Drive

Nashville, Tennessee 37228-1803

(615) 736-5213 FAX (615) 736-2018

Region V

Chicago, Illinois Regional Office

Louis Berra

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Chicago Regional Office

Ralph Metcalfe Federal Building

77 West Jackson Boulevard

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507

(312) 353-5680 FAX (312) 353-0121

Cincinnati, Ohio Office (B)

Loustine Tuck

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Cincinnati Office

Room 9002

Federal Office Building

550 Main Street

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-3253

(513) 684-2884 FAX (513) 684-6224

Cleveland, Ohio Office (B)

Phillip J. Giaconia

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Cleveland Office

Room 420

One Playhouse Square

1375 Euclid Avenue

Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1670

(216) 522-4065 FAX (216) 522-2975

Columbus, Ohio Office (A)

Don Jakob

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Columbus Office

200 North High Street

Columbus, Ohio 43215-2499

(614) 469-5737 FAX (614) 469-2432

Detroit, Michigan Office (A)

Robert Brown

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Detroit Office

Patrick V. McNamara Federal Building

477 Michigan Avenue

Detroit, Michigan 48226-2592

(313) 226-7900 FAX (313) 226-4394

Grand Rapids, Michigan Office (B)

John Milchick

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Grand Rapids Office

2922 Fuller Avenue, N.E.

Grand Rapids, Michigan 49505-3499

(616) 456-2100 FAX (616) 456-2191

Indianapolis, Indiana Office (A)

Erica Dobreff

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Indianapolis Office

151 North Delaware Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2526

(317) 226-6303 FAX (317) 226-6317

Milwaukee, Wisconsin Office (A)

Lester Marriner

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Milwaukee Office

Suite 1380

Henry S. Reuss Federal Plaza

310 West Wisconsin Avenue

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203-2289

(414) 297-3214 FAX (414) 297-3947

Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota (A)

John Buenger

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Minneapolis-St. Paul Office

220 Second Street, South

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2195

(612) 370-3000 FAX (612) 370-3220

Region VI

Fort Worth, Texas Regional Office

Larry Mumford

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Fort Worth Regional Office

1600 Throckmorton

P.O. Box 2905

Fort Worth, Texas 76113-2905

(817) 885-5401 FAX (817) 885-5629

Houston, Texas Office (B)

Allen J. Novosad

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Houston Office

Suite 200

Norfolk Tower

2211 Norfolk

Houston, Texas 77098-4096

(713) 653-3274 FAX (713) 653-3319

Little Rock, Arkansas Office (A)

Nathan Abernathy

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Little Rock Office

Suite 900

TCBY Tower

425 West Capitol Avenue

Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3488

(501) 324-5931 FAX (501) 324-5900

New Orleans, Louisiana Office (A)

Jose A. Pagan

Director--Housing Development

HUD-New Orleans Office

Fisk Federal Building

1661 Canal Street

New Orleans, Louisiana 70112-1887

(504) 589-7200 FAX (504) 589-2917

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Office (A)

Sherry Hunt

Acting Director--Housing Development

HUD--Oklahoma City Office

Murrah Federal Building

200 N.W. 5th Street

Oklahoma 73102-3202

(405) 231-4181 FAX (405) 231-4648

San Antonio, Texas Office (A)

Robert W. Hicks

Acting Director--Housing Development

HUD--San Antonio Office

Washington Square Building

800 Dolorosa Street

San Antonio, Texas 78207-4563

(210) 229-6800 FAX (210) 229-6753

Region VII

Kansas City, Kansas Regional Office

Richard Kluge

Director--Housing Development

HUD--Kansas City Regional Office

Room 200

Gateway Tower II

400 State Avenue

Kansas City, Kansas 66101-2406

(913) 236-2162

Des Moines, Iowa Office (B)

Donna Davis

Director--Housing Development

HUD--Des Moines Office

Room 239

Federal Building

210 Walnut Street

Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2155

(515) 284-4512 FAX (515) 284-4743

Omaha, Nebraska Office (A)

Robert E. Peterson

Director--Housing Development

HUD--Omaha Office

Executive Tower Centre

10909 Mill Valley Road

Omaha, Nebraska 68154-3955

(402) 492-3101 FAX (402) 492-3150

St. Louis, Missouri Office (A)

Joy Miller

Director--Housing Development

HUD--St. Louis Office

Third Floor

Robert A. Young Federal Building

1222 Spruce Street

St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2836

(314) 539-6560 FAX (314) 539-6575

Region VIII

Denver, Colorado Regional Office

Arthur Tonilli

Director--Housing Development

HUD--Denver Regional Office

Executive Tower Building

1405 Curtis Street

Denver, Colorado 80202-2349

(303) 844-4513 FAX (303) 844-2475

Region IX

San Francisco, California Regional Office

Jayne Hulbert Humphrey

Director--Housing Development

HUD--San Francisco Regional Office

Philip Burton Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse

450 Golden Gate Avenue

P.O. Box 36003

San Francisco, California 94102-3448

(415) 556-4752 FAX (415) 556-4176

Honolulu, Hawaii Office (A)

Jill Hurt

Director--Housing Development

HUD--Honolulu Office

Suite 500

Seven Waterfront Plaza

500 Ala Moana Blvd.

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813-4918

(808) 541-1323 FAX (808) 541-3146

Los Angeles, California Office (A)

Joe L. Hirsch

Director--Housing Development

HUD--Los Angeles Office

1615 West Olympic Boulevard

Los Angeles, California 90015-3801

(213) 251-7122 FAX (213) 251-7096

Phoenix, Arizona Office (B)

Laura Massie

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Phoenix Office

Suite 600

Two Arizona Center

400 North 5th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2361

(602) 379-4434 FAX (602) 379-3985

Sacramento, California Office (B)

Williams F. Bolton

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Sacramento Office

Suite 200

777 12th Street

Sacramento, California 95814-1977

(916) 551-1351 FAX (916) 551-2899

Region X

Seattle, Washington Regional Office

John H. Taylor

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Seattle Regional Office

Suite 200

Seattle Federal Office Building

909 First Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98104-1000

(206) 220-5101 FAX (206) 553-4405

Anchorage, Alaska Office (A)

Gene Dobrzynski

Chief--Housing Development

HUD-Anchorage Office

Suite 401

University Plaza Building

949 East 36th Avenue

Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4135

(907) 271-4170 FAX (907) 271-3667

Portland, Oregon Office (A)

Thomas C. Cusack

Director--Housing Development

HUD-Portland Office

520 S.W. 6th Avenue

Portland, Oregon 97204-1596

(503) 326-2561 FAX (503) 326-3097

[FR Doc. 94-2296 Filed 2-1-94; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-27-P