Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received; Dispositions of Petitions Issued

Federal RegisterAug 18, 1994

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Summary Notice No. PE-94-30]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received;

Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions

of prior petitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the

application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption (14

CFR Part 11), this notice contains a summary of certain petitions

seeking relief from specified requirements of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I), dispositions of certain petitions

previously received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to

improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of

FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the

inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to

affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket

number involved and must be received on or before September 2, 1994.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any petition in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket

(AGC-200), Petition Docket No. ________, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20591.

The petition, any comments received, and a copy of any final

disposition are filed in the assigned regulatory docket and are

available for examination in the Rules Docket (AGC-200), Room 915G, FAA

Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone (202) 267-3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone (202) 267-7470.

This notice is published to paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of

Sec. 11.27 of Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part

11).

Issued in Washington, D.C., on August 10, 1994.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

Docket No.: 27602.

Petitioner: Air Canada.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.715.

Description of Relief Sought: To allow Air Canada to operate its

aircraft in the United States under a special ferry flight permit

issued by Transport Canada.

Docket No.: 27675.

Petitioner: Christian Air Relief.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 21.191(d)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit Christian Air Relief to

operate a non-Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-certificated

aircraft (an Antonov AN-2) between a U.S. port of entry (Houma

Terrebonne Louisiana airport) and destinations outside the United

States (the Gulf of Mexico and Central and South America).

Docket No.: 27816.

Petitioner: Darton International, Inc.,

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 21.195 and 91.319 (a)(1) and

(a)(2).

Description of Relief Sought: To permit Darton International, Inc.,

to conduct professional flight training in an experimental aircraft, a

former military T-28, for compensation or hire.

Docket No.: 27818.

Petitioner: Experimental Aircraft Association.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.319 (a)(1) and (a)(2).

Description of Relief Sought: To permit flight training for

compensation or hire in experimental aircraft (i.e., former military

aircraft) when that instruction is provided in accordance with a

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-approved training program.

Docket No.: 27819.

Petitioner: FFV Aerotech, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 145.45(f).

Description of Relief Sought: To permit FFV, Inc., to assign

Inspection procedures Manuals to key individuals within each department

and functionally an adequate number of manuals for access by all other

employees.

Docket No.: 27822.

Petitioner: Milwaukee General Aviation, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.119.

Description of Relief Sought: To permit Milwaukee General Aviation,

Inc., to conduct flights at approximately 800 feet above ground level

as necessary, due to the prevailing meteorological conditions, for the

purpose of conducting its aerial traffic observation.

Docket No.: 27825.

Petitioner: Emery Worldwide Airlines.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.383(c).

Description of Relief Sought: To allow Emery Worldwide Airlines to

use the services of Bob Massa as co-pilot after his 60th birthday and

to allow Mr. Massa to serve as co-pilot for Emery Worldwide Airlines

after he has reached his 60th birthday.

Docket No.: 27826.

Petitioner: McDonnell Douglas Corporation.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 21.325(b)(1).

Description of Relief Sought: To permit Douglas Aircraft Company

(DAC) to complete production assembly, issue airworthiness

certificates, and deliver newly manufactured DAC aircraft from Matrix

Aeronautica in Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico, to DAC's airline

customers located in various countries throughout the world.

Docket No.: 27827.

Petitioner: Mr. Bert M. Yetman.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.383(c).

Description of Relief Sought: To allow Mr. Yetman to act as a pilot

in Part 121 operations after reaching his 60th birthday.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: 20583.

Petitioner: Tenneco, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.57 (c) and (d) and

61.58(c)(1).

Description of Relief Sought: To permit pilotsemployed by Tenneco,

Inc., to complete their entire 24-month pilot-in-command check in a

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-approved simulator.

Grant, August 2, 1994, Exemption No. 3106G

Docket No.: 21605.

Petitioner: Alaska Airlines, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.574(a) (1) and (3).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

3850, as amended, which permits Alaska Airlines, Inc., (ASA) to carry

and operate oxygen storage and dispensing equipment for medical use by

patients requiring emergency medical or continuing medical attention

while being carried as passengers by ASA. The equipment shall be

furnished and maintained by the hospital treating the patient.

Grant, July 22, 1994, Exemption No. 3850E

Docket No.: 22822.

Petitioner: T.B.M., Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.611.

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow T.B.M., Inc.,

and its subsidiary, Butler Aircraft Company, to continue to conduct

ferry flights with one engine inoperative on their McDonnell Douglas

DC-6 and DC-7 series aircraft without obtaining a special flight permit

for each flight.

Grant, July 27, 1994, Exemption No. 5204B

Docket No.: 24761.

Petitioner: Executive Jet Aviation, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.511(a)(2) and 135.165(b).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow Executive Jet

Aviation, Inc., to operate its turbojet-powered aircraft equipped with

a single long-range navigation system (LRNS) and a single high-

frequency (HF) communication radio in extended overwater operations.

Grant, July 20, 1994, Exemption No. 4709D

Docket No.: 26095.

Petitioner: Cochise Community College.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 141.65.

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Cochise

Community College to recommend graduates of its approved certification

course for flight instructor-airplane single engine certificates and

associated rating without taking the Federal Aviation Administration's

practical test in accordance with the provision of subpart D of Part

141.

Grant, July 22, 1994, Exemption No. 5225B

Docket No.: 26214.

Petitioner: Epps Air Service, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.165(b).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow Epps Air

Service, Inc., to operate certain airplanes equipped with one long-

range navigation system (LRNS) and one high-frequency (HF)

communication system in extended overwater operations.

Grant, July 20, 1994, Exemption No. 5252B

Docket No.: 26845.

Petitioner: University of North Dakota.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 141.65.

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit the University

of North Dakota to recommend graduates of its approved certification

course for flight instructor certificates and ratings without taking

the Federal Aviation Administration's practical test.

Grant, July 21, 1994, Exemption No. 5546A

Docket No.: 26888.

Petitioner: Artez Flying Service, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 141, appendix A, paragraph

(5).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Artez Flying

Service, Inc., to administer Stage II checks before a student's first

solo cross-country flight.

Grant, July 21, 1994, Exemption No. 5529A

Docket No.: 26896.

Petitioner: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 21.325(b)(3).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow Boeing

Commercial Airplane Group to issue export airworthiness approvals for

Class II and Class III products that are U.S.-manufactured by Boeing

and exported from its facilities located in other countries.

Grant, July 18, 1994, Exemption No. 5942

Docket No.: 27416.

Petitioner: JetSun Aviation Centre.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Airways Service

to operate without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on its

Beechcraft Bonanza, N35BK. [On February 1, 1994, Airways Service

changed its name to Aviators Anonymous, Inc., d.b.a. JetSun Aviation

Centre, while keeping address and staffing the same. This exemption

reflects this amendment, as well as extending the expiration date until

July 31, 1996.]

Grant, July 21, 1994, Exemption No. 5808A

Docket No.: 27452.

Petitioner: Parker Hannifin Corporation.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 21.325(b)(3).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow Parker Hannifin

Corporation (PHC) to issue export airworthiness approvals for Class II

and Class III products that are U.S.-manufactured by PHC, and exported

from its facilities located in other countries.

Grant, July 18, 1994, Exemption No. 5491

Docket No.: 27577.

Petitioner: Aviall.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 145.45(f).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow Aviall to keep

one set of repair station procedures manuals in one central location,

in each of its certificated battery repair stations. The manuals would

be available for review by all supervisor and inspection personnel, in

lieu of providing a copy to each individual as required by the FAR.

Grant, July 15, 1994, Exemption No. 5940

Docket No.: 27758.

Petitioner: Pacific States Charter Services.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 43.3(g).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow pilots employed

by Pacific States Charter Services to remove and reinstall the left

rear seat in its Piper PA-34-200T aircraft.

Grant, July 20, 1994, Exemption No. 5943

Docket No.: 27784.

Petitioner: Deutsche Aerospace Airbus GmbH.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 25.785(d), 25.813(b),

25.857(e), and 25.1447 (c)(1) and (c)(3)(ii).

Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow carriage, in a

Model A310-203 passenger-to-freighter airplane, the carriage of up to

four supernumeraries on the main deck in addition to the maximum four

flight deck occupants, with a total occupancy of eight.

Grant, July 13, 1994, Exemption No. 5938

[FR Doc. 94-20299 Filed 8-17-94; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.