Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia-Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program
Federal RegisterAug 17, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[DC16-1-6286a, A-1-FRL-5052-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
District of Columbia-Small Business Stationary Source Technical and
Environmental Compliance Assistance Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the District of Columbia for the purpose of establishing a
Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance
Assistance Program (PROGRAM). This SIP revision was submitted by the
District to satisfy the Federal mandate of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to
ensure that small businesses have access to the technical assistance
and regulatory information necessary to comply with the CAA. The
rational for approval is set forth in this document; additional
information is available at the address indicated in the Addresses
section. This action is being taken in accordance with section 110 of
the CAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on October 17, 1994 unless adverse
or critical comments are received by September 16, 1994. If the
effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Thomas J. Maslany, Director, Air,
Radiation, and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Copies of
the documents relevant to this action are available for public
inspection during normal business hours at the Air, Radiation, and
Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 841
Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107; District of Columbia
Environmental Regulation Administration, 2100 Martin Luther King, Jr.,
Avenue, SE., room 203, Washington, DC 20020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer M. Abramson, (215) 597-2923.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Implementation of the provisions the CAA will require regulation of
many small businesses so that areas may attain and maintain the
National ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and reduce the emission
of air toxics. Small businesses frequently lack the technical expertise
and financial resources necessary to evaluate such regulations and to
determine the appropriate mechanisms for compliance. In anticipation of
the impact of these requirements on small businesses, the CAA requires
that states adopt a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and
Environmental Compliance Assistance Program, and submit this PROGRAM as
a revision to the federally approved SIP. In addition, the CAA directs
EPA to oversee these small business assistance programs and report to
Congress on their implementation. The requirements for establishing a
PROGRAMare set out in section 507 of title V of the CAA. In February
1992, EPA issued Guidelines for the Implementation of Section 507 of
the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments in order to delineate the Federal and
state roles in meeting the new statutory provisions and as a tool to
provide further guidance to the states on submitting acceptable SIP
revisions.
On October 22, 1993, the District of Columbia submitted a formal
revision to its SIP. The SIP revision consists of a plan for
establishing a PROGRAM. In order to gain full approval, the District's
submittal must provide for each of the following program elements: (1)
The establishment of a Small Business Assistance Program (SBAP) to
provide technical and compliance assistance to small businesses; (2)
the establishment of a District Small Business Ombudsman to represent
the interests of small businesses in the regulatory process; and (3)
the creation of a Compliance Advisory Panel (CAP) to determine and
report on the overall effectiveness of the SBAP. The plan must include
the duties, funding, and schedule of implementation for the three
program components. The plan must also determine the eligibility of
small business stationary sources for assistance in the program.
The District's plan for the establishment of a Small Business
Assistance Program (SBAP) and Ombudsman was adopted and will be
implemented pursuant to the authority vested in the Mayor by section
422(6) of the District of Columbia Self Government and Governmental
Reorganization Act of 1973, as amended (1992), D.C. Code sections 1-242
(6), (11) and (12), 6-901, 6-902 and 6-903. The creation and
administration of the Compliance Advisory Panel will be accomplished by
Mayoral order.
Milestones for implementing the essential elements of the
District's PROGRAM are included as part of the SIP revision submittal.
The District has committed to establishing a SBAP, administered by the
Air Resources Management Division of the Environmental Regulation
Administration, by September 1, 1993. In January, 1994 the District
appointed a small business representative to coordinate SBAP
activities. Eligibility for assistance under the SBAP will be
determined by the criteria outlined in the PROGRAM submittal. Full SBAP
implementation will begin no later than November 15, 1994. The District
has committed to establishing an Ombudsman's office, to be located in
the Office of the Administrator of the Environmental Regulation
Administration, by September 1, 1993. The Ombudsman will complete the
first annual review of the SBAP by November 15, 1994. A Mayoral Order
establishing the creation and administration of the Compliance Advisory
Panel was issued on November 3, 1992. The District has committed to
convening its CAP by June 1, 1993. The CAP will submit its first annual
report to EPA by November 15, 1994.
II. Analysis of SIP Revision
Section 507(a) of the CAA sets forth seven requirements that the
District must meet to have an approvable SBAP. Six of the requirements
will be discussed in this section of this document, while the seventh
requirement, establishment of a state Small Business Ombudsman, will be
discussed in the next section.
1. Small Business Assistance Program
The first requirement is to establish adequate mechanisms for
developing, collecting and coordinating information concerning
compliance methods and technologies for small business stationary
sources, and programs to encourage lawful cooperation among such
sources and other persons to further compliance with the CAA. The
second requirement is to establish adequate mechanisms for assisting
small business stationary sources with pollution prevention and
accidental release detection and prevention, including providing
information concerning alternative technologies, process changes,
products and methods of operation that help reduce air pollution. The
District has met these requirements by establishing a SBAP,
administered by the District of Columbia Air Resources Management
Division (ARMD). The ARMD SBAP has the responsibility of collecting and
coordinating information concerning compliance methods and acceptable
control technologies for small business stationary sources. The ARMD
will also work closely with the Office of Emergency Preparedness and
other District organizations in coordinating information exchange
regarding alternative technologies, process changes, products and other
methods of pollution prevention and accidental release prevention and
detection. The dissemination of SBAP information shall take two forms.
Technical and compliance information will be disseminated to small
businesses in a proactive manner via press releases, brochures and
other media as necessary. Additionally, ``outreach'' programs such as
conferences or meetings with Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners, small
businesses, and/or trade associations, etc. may be utilized. The SBAP
will also disseminate information in a reactive manner via an
established telephone hotline and information clearinghouse which will
be capable of handling inquires from the small business community.
The third requirement is to develop a compliance and technical
assistance program for small business stationary sources which assists
small businesses in determining applicable requirements and in
receiving permits under the CAA in a timely and efficient manner. The
SBAP will work closely with the staff of the ARMD Engineering and
Planning Branch and Compliance and Enforcement Branch to help sources
identify applicable requirements and obtain permits. Specifically, the
SBAP will be responsible for providing advice and assistance to small
businesses in the interpretation of regulatory requirements, explaining
permitting procedures and providing information regarding fees, when
and where to apply, the length of time necessary to receive a permit,
etc. Additional responsibilities include helping small businesses
determine if they qualify for reduced fees under the waiver provisions
of the title V Operating Permit Program.
The fourth requirement is to develop adequate mechanisms to assure
that small business stationary sources receive notice of their rights
under the CAA in such manner and form as to assure reasonably adequate
time for such sources to evaluate compliance methods and any relevant
or applicable proposed or final regulation or standards issued under
the CAA. The fifth requirement is to develop adequate mechanisms for
informing small business stationary sources of their obligations under
the CAA, including mechanisms for referring such sources to qualified
auditors or, at the option of the state, for providing audits of the
operations of such sources to determine compliance with the CAA. The
SBAP is responsible for notifying eligible sources of their statutory
and regulatory rights and obligations under the Clean Air Act in a
timely fashion. Such communication will include explaining fine and
permit policies, the consequences of operating in violation of
regulations, and appeal procedures. In addition, the District's SBAP
will administer an audit program which provides technical assistance on
pollution prevention or control options. Environmental professionals
from the Compliance and Enforcement Branch and the Engineering and
Planning Branch of the ARMD are to serve as auditors for the program.
The sixth requirement is to develop procedures for consideration of
requests from a small business stationary source for modification of:
(A) Any work practice or technological method of compliance; or (B) the
schedule of milestones for implementing such work practices or
compliance methods preceding any applicable compliance date. The SBAP
will meet this requirement by developing procedures, in accordance with
section 507(a)(7) of the CAA, for handling requests from small
businesses for modifications of work practices or alternative air
pollution control methods. The District has committed to establishing
such procedures by November 15, 1994.
An ARMD program analyst, authorized to report directly to the
Program Manager of the Air Resources Management Division, is
responsible for the development and initiation of SBAP programs. As
SBAP programs are developed, additional staff will be hired as
required. The SBAP will be funded by District of Columbia and/or
Federal air pollution control grant funds until the effective date of
implementation of the District's title V Operating Permits Program.
After the effective date, the District's SBAP will be funded by
District of Columbia funds appropriated from the revenues generated by
fees required by the title V Operating Permits Program.
2. Ombudsman Office
The seventh requirement of section 507(a)(3) is the designation of
a state office to serve as the Ombudsman for small business stationary
sources in connection with the implementation of the CAA. The
District's Ombudsman will work in the Office of the Administrator of
the Environmental Regulation Administration as a member of the
Administrator's staff. Consequently, the Ombudsman will be in an
effective position to represent the views and interests of the small
business community on issues concerning the implementation of the CAA.
The Ombudsman will have direct access to the Program Manager of the
ARMD and his/her superior, the Administrator. In this position, the
Ombudsman can easily evaluate the District's SBAP, investigate and
resolve disputes between businesses and air pollution control
authorities, develop and propose legislation, and actively promote the
small business point-of-view. The Ombudsman will also have access to
the Director of the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, the
Office of the Corporation Counsel, and the Office of the Mayor.
A listing of the Ombudsman's duties indicate that it will be
readily accessible to small businesses and, on their behalf, be
authorized to provide reports to and to communicate with appropriate
personnel. The Ombudsman will also distribute the District's CAP
reports and advisory opinions and provide administrative support to the
CAP. The District has committed to hiring a program analyst to serve as
the Small Business Ombudsman. Additional staff for the Office of the
Ombudsman will be recruited as necessary. The Ombudsman will be funded
with District of Columbia appropriated funds. After the effective date
of the District's title V Operating Permits Program, the Ombudsman and
his or her staff may be funded by appropriations from revenues of the
District's title V Operating Permits Program.
3. Compliance Advisory Panel
Section 507(e) of the CAA requires each state to establish a
Compliance Advisory Panel that includes two members selected by the
Governor (or equivalent) who are not owners or representatives of
owners of small business stationary sources; four members selected by
the state legislature (or equivalent) who are owners, or represent
owners, of small businesses; and one member selected by the head of the
agency in charge of the air pollution permit program. The District has
committed to creating a compliance advisory panel. The composition of
the District's CAP is in accordance with the method of selection
required by section 507(e)(2) of the CAA for a unicameral legislature.
All CAP members, with the exception of the representative of the Air
Resources Management Division, a District of Columbia employee, will be
unpaid appointees.
In addition to establishing the minimum membership of the CAP the
CAA delineates certain responsibilities of the panel. A description of
the duties and authorities delegated to the District's Compliance
Advisory Panel indicates that it will be responsible for all activities
required by section 507(e). These activities include rendering advisory
opinions on the effectiveness of the small business ombudsman and SBAP
and preparing periodic reports to EPA concerning the effectiveness of
the PROGRAM following the intent of the Federal Paperwork Reduction
Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Equal Access to Justice
Act. The CAP will also be responsible for reviewing information
disseminated to small business stationary sources to assure such
information is understandable to laypersons.
4. Source Eligibility
Section 507(c)(1) of the CAA defines the term ``small business
stationary source'' as a stationary source that:
(A) Is owned or operated by a person who employs 100 or fewer
individuals;
(B) Is a small business concern as defined in the Small Business
Act;
(C) Is not a major stationary source;
(D) Does not emit 50 tons per year (tpy) or more of any regulated
pollutant; and
(E) Emits less than 75 tpy of all regulated pollutants.
The District's program definition of the term ``small business
stationary source'' is identical to the statutory definition found in
section 507(c). All small business stationary sources located in the
District shall be eligible to receive assistance from the SBAP. Any
source which does not meet the criteria in (C), (D), and (E) above but
does not emit more than 100 tons per year of all regulated pollutants
may petition the District of Columbia to be included in the SBAP. The
District may, after public notice and opportunity for public comment,
permit such a source to participate in the SBAP even though the source
does not meet the criteria given above.
III. Summary of SIP Revision
The District has submitted a SIP revision which fully implements
each of the program elements required by CAA section 507. As previously
stated, the District has committed to fully implementing its SBAP,
administered by the Air Resources Management Division of the
Environmental Regulation Administration, by November 15, 1994. The
District's Ombudsman, located in the Office of the Administrator of the
Environmental Regulation Administration, shall complete its first
annual review of the SBAP, by November 15, 1994. The District's CAP,
authorized by Mayoral Order, shall complete its first annual review of
the SBAP and Ombudsman and submit it to EPA by November 15, 1994. In
this action, EPA is approving the SIP revision submittal by the
District of Columbia. Accordingly, Sec. 52.510 is added to 40 CFR part
52, subpart J-District of Columbia to reflect EPA's approval action and
the fact that it is considered part of the District of Columbia SIP.
EPA is approving this SIP revision without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates
no adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision
should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will become
effective October 17, 1994 unless, within 30 days of publication,
adverse or critical comments are received.
If EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn before
the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is
advised that this action will be effective on October 17, 1994.
Final Action
EPA is approving the District of Columbia's plan for the
establishment of a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and
Environmental Compliance Assistance Program. Accordingly, Sec. 52.510
is added to 40 CFR part 52, subpart J-District of Columbia to reflect
EPA's approval action. EPA has reviewed this request for revision of
the federally-approved state implementation plan for conformance with
the CAA including section 507 and section 110(a)(2)(E).
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be
considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and
environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
By this action, EPA is approving a state program created for the
purpose of assisting small businesses in complying with existing
statutory and regulatory requirements. The program being approved does
not impose any new regulatory burden on small businesses; it is a
program under which small businesses may elect to take advantage of
assistance provided by the state. Therefore, because EPA's approval of
this program does not impose any new regulatory requirements on small
businesses, the Administrator certifies that it does not have a
significant economic impact on any small entities affected.
This action has been classified as a Table 2 action for signature
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by
an October 4, 1993 memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant
Administrator for Air and Radiation. The OMB has exempted this
regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 17, 1994. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Small business
assistance program.
Dated: June 9, 1994.
Peter H. Kostmayer,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart J--District of Columbia
2. Section 52.510 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 52.510 Small business assistance program.
On October 22, 1993, the Administrator of the District of Columbia
Environmental Regulation Administration submitted a plan for the
establishment and implementation of a Small Business Technical and
Environmental Compliance Assistance Program as a state implementation
plan revision (SIP), as required by title V of the Clean Air Act. EPA
approved the Small Business Technical and Environmental Compliance
Assistance Program on August 17, 1994 and made it part of the District
of Columbia SIP. As with all components of the SIP, the District of
Columbia must implement the program as submitted and approved by EPA.
[FR Doc. 94-20148 Filed 8-16-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.