Proposed Settlement; Acid Rain Allowance Allocations and Reserves Rule Litigation
Federal RegisterJul 1, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5006-1]
Proposed Settlement; Acid Rain Allowance Allocations and Reserves
Rule Litigation
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act
(``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement of Southern
Illinois Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency,
No. 93-2263 (7th Cir.).
This case involves a challenge to the final rule, entitled ``Acid
Rain Allowance Allocations and Reserves,'' which, inter alia, allocated
sulfur dioxide emission allowances to Marion [Illinois] Power Station
Units 1, 2, and 3. 58 FR 15634, 15662 (March 23, 1993).
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Environmental Protection Agency will receive
written comments relating to the settlement from persons who were not
named as parties to the litigation in question. The Agency or the
Department of Justice may withhold or withdraw consent to the proposed
settlement if the comments disclose facts or circumstances that
indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or
inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Copies of the settlement
are available from Phyllis Cochran, Air and Radiation Division (2344),
Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M
Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments
should be sent to Jon Averback at the above address and must be
submitted on or before August 1, 1994.
Dated: June 27, 1994.
Jean C. Nelson,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 94-16016 Filed 6-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.