Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water Act In accordance with Departmental Policy 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp., et al., Civil Action No. LR-C-80-109, was lodged on December 30, 1993 with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The proposed consent decree resolves the liability of Velsicol Chemical Corporation under Sections 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, and Section 7003 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6973, with respect to the Vertac Site located in Jacksonville, Arkansas. The Department of Justice will receive, for a period on or before February 23, 1994, comments relating to the proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp., et al, DOJ Ref. #90-7-1-18B. The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the United States Attorney, 425 W. Capital, 5th floor, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201; the Region VI Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th floor, Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $7.25 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library. John C. Cruden, Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 94-1519 Filed 1-21-94; 10:00 am] BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Federal RegisterJan 24, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water Act
In accordance with Departmental Policy 28 CFR 50.7, notice is
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. Vertac
Chemical Corp., et al., Civil Action No. LR-C-80-109, was lodged on
December 30, 1993 with the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Arkansas. The proposed consent decree resolves the
liability of Velsicol Chemical Corporation under Sections 106 and 107
of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, and Section 7003 of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6973, with respect to
the Vertac Site located in Jacksonville, Arkansas.
The Department of Justice will receive, for a period on or before
February 23, 1994, comments relating to the proposed consent decree.
Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General for the
Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United States v. Vertac
Chemical Corp., et al, DOJ Ref. #90-7-1-18B.
The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the
United States Attorney, 425 W. Capital, 5th floor, Little Rock,
Arkansas 72201; the Region VI Office of the Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202; and at the Consent
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th floor, Washington, DC 20005,
(202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be obtained
in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street,
NW., 4th floor, Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy, please
refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $7.25
(25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree
Library.
John C. Cruden,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 94-1519 Filed 1-21-94; 10:00 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.