Final Minimum Percentages for ``High Rate'' and ``Significant Increase in the Rate'' for Implementation of the Statutory General Funding Preference and Final Funding Priority for Grants for Establishment of Departments of Family MedicineFiscal Year 1994
Federal RegisterJun 17, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
Final Minimum Percentages for ``High Rate'' and ``Significant
Increase in the Rate'' for Implementation of the Statutory General
Funding Preference and Final Funding Priority for Grants for
Establishment of Departments of Family Medicine--Fiscal Year 1994
The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) announces
the final minimum percentages for ``high rate'' and ``significant
increase in the rate'' for implementation of the statutory general
funding preference and final funding priority for fiscal year (FY) 1994
Grants for Establishment of Departments of Family Medicine authorized
under the authority of section 747(b) of the Public Health Service
(PHS) Act, title VII, as amended by the Health Professions Education
Extension Amendments of 1992, Public Law 102-408, dated October 13,
1992.
Purpose
Section 747(b) of the PHS Act authorizes support to schools of
medicine and osteopathic medicine to meet the costs of projects to
establish, maintain, or improve family medicine academic administrative
units (which may be departments, divisions, or other units) to provide
clinical instruction in family medicine. Funds awarded will be used to:
(1) Plan and develop model educational predoctoral, faculty development
and graduate medical education programs in family medicine which will
meet the requirements of section 747(a), by the end of the project
period of section 747(b) support; and (2) support academic and clinical
activities relevant to the field of family medicine.
The program may also assist schools to strengthen the
administrative base and structure that is responsible for the planning,
direction, organization, coordination, and evaluation of all
undergraduate and graduate family medicine activities. Funds are to
complement rather than duplicate programmatic activities for actual
operation of family medicine training programs under section 747(a).
Statutory General Funding Preference
As provided in section 791(a) of the PHS Act, preference will be
given to any qualified applicant that--
(A) has a high rate for placing graduates in practice settings
having the principal focus of serving residents of medically
underserved communities; or
(B) during the 2-year period preceding the fiscal year for which an
award is sought, has achieved a significant increase in the rate of
placing graduates in such settings. This preference will only be
applied to applications that rank above the 20th percentile that have
been recommended for approval by the peer review group.
Statutory Funding Preference
Establishment and Expansion
In addition, Public Law 102-408 has amended section 747(b) to
include the following statutory funding preference for this program.
Section 747(b)(2) provides that preference shall be given to any
qualified applicant that agrees to expend the award for one of the
following purposes:
(a) Establishing an academic administrative unit (defined as a
department, division, or other unit), for programs in family medicine;
or
(b) substantially expanding the programs of such a unit.
A program will meet the definition of ``substantial expansion'' if
it has developed an acceptable plan for a 50 percent increase in a
sufficient number of the following areas to qualify for 70 points. The
expansion must be completed within 3 years.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Points
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Required 3rd Year Clerkship................................ 30
(2) Required Preceptorship..................................... 20
(3) Family Medicine Research................................... 10
(4) Expansion of Faculty....................................... 10
(5) Faculty Development Program for Community Based Faculty.... 10
(6) Family Medicine Faculty Represented on Medical School
Standing Committees of Admissions or Curriculum............... 10
(7) Family Medicine Faculty Represented on Dean's Executive
Committee that determines Tenure.............................. 10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed notice was published in the Federal Register on January
6, 1994, at 59 FR 767 for public comment. Several comments were
received during the 30-day comment period from one respondent regarding
the statutory funding preferences, which are established by law and the
established funding priorities for which comments were not requested.
The respondent also expressed concern with the proposed funding
priority. The respondent suggests that we focus more on the results
than activities. These comments will be given serious consideration in
the development of funding priorities in future cycles.
Therefore, the final minimum percentages for ``high rate'' and
``significant increase in the rate'' and final funding priority for
this program will be retained as follows:
Final Minimum Percentages for ``High Rate'' and ``Significant Increase
in the Rate''
``High rate'' means that 20 percent of all graduates of the medical
school in 1989 or 1990, whichever is greater, are spending at least 50
percent of their work time in clinical practice in the specified
settings.
``Significant increase in the rate'' means that, between academic
years 1991-92 and 1992-93, the rate of placing 1989 or 1990 graduates
in the specified settings has increased by at least 50 percent and that
not less than 15 percent of graduates from the most recent year (1990)
are working in these settings.
Final Funding Priority for FY 1994
In addition, a funding priority will be given to applicants based
on their level of accomplishment in relation to the outcome or process
measures cited below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outcome measures Points Process measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--25% of students who 100 ............................
graduated in 1991, 1992 and
1993 entered family practice
residencies.
--20% of students who 75 ............................
graduated in 1991, 1992 and
1993 entered family practice
residencies.
--15% of students who 50 --Required 3rd Yr.
graduated in 1991, 1992 and Clerkship* (of at least 4
1993 entered family practice weeks duration).
residencies.
--12% of students who 35 --Required primary care
graduated in 1991, 1992 and preceptorship/mentorship
1993 entered family practice program* in preclinical
residencies. years.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Curricular elements must be in place at the time of application or the
applicant must provide satisfactory evidence (including commitments
from institutional officials) that the clerkship or preceptorship will
be operational by the beginning of the third year of the grant.
Applicants May Only Receive Priority Points in One of the Above Six
Categories.
Additional Information
Questions regarding programmatic information should be directed to:
Ms. Shelby Biedenkapp, Program Specialist, Primary Care Medical
Education Branch, Division of Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions,
Health Resources and Services Administration, Parklawn Building, room
9A-20, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone: (301)
443-3614 FAX: (301) 443-8890.
This program is listed at 93.984 in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance. It is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs (as implemented
through 45 CFR part 100).
This program is not subject to the Public Health System Reporting
Requirements.
Dated: June 13,1994.
Ciro V. Sumaya,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-14711 Filed 6-16-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.