Disease Associated With Exposure to Certain Herbicide Agents (Multiple Myeloma and Respiratory Cancers)
Federal RegisterJun 9, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900-AG73
Disease Associated With Exposure to Certain Herbicide Agents
(Multiple Myeloma and Respiratory Cancers)
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has amended its
adjudication regulations concerning presumptive service connection for
certain diseases even though there is no record of the disease during
service. This amendment is necessary to implement a decision of the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs under the authority granted by the Agent
Orange Act of 1991 that there is a positive association between
exposure to herbicides used in the Republic of Vietnam during the
Vietnam era and the subsequent development of multiple myeloma and
respiratory cancers. The intended effect of this amendment is to
establish presumptive service connection for those conditions based on
herbicide exposure.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This amendment is effective on June 9, 1994, as
provided by Public Law 102-4.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald England, Chief, Regulations
Staff, Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 233-3005.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA published a proposal to amend 38 CFR
3.307(a) and 3.309(e) to establish presumptive service connection for
multiple myeloma and respiratory cancers based on exposure to
herbicides in the Federal Register of February 3, 1994 (59 FR 5161-63).
As explained in that notice, these presumptions of service connection,
like various others, are rebuttable under 38 U.S.C. 1113 by affirmative
evidence to the contrary; evidence establishing an intercurrent, post-
service cause of the disease; or evidence establishing that the disease
is due to the veteran's own willful misconduct. Interested persons were
invited to submit written comments, suggestions or objections
concerning the proposal on or before March 7, 1994. We received one
comment from the General Counsel and Director of Litigation for the
National Veterans Legal Services Project.
The commenter suggested changes not only to the proposed rule
concerning multiple myeloma and respiratory cancers published on
February 3, 1994, but also to the final rule effective February 3,
1994, that established presumptive service connection for Hodgkin's
disease and porphyria cutanea tarda (See 59 FR 5106-07) based on
exposure to herbicides, to the final rule published on October 15,
1991, that established service connection for soft-tissue sarcoma (See
56 FR 51651-53) based on exposure to herbicides containing dioxin, and
to the final rule published on October 21, 1991, that extended the
period during which chloracne must appear following exposure to a
herbicide containing dioxin in order to establish service connection
(See 56 FR 52473-74).
To the extent that these comments pertain to rulemaking other than
the proposed rule concerning multiple myeloma and respiratory cancers
published on February 3, 1994, the comments are beyond the scope of the
current rulemaking.
The commenter stated that the proposal concerning multiple myeloma
and respiratory cancers is in error since it specifies an effective
date that is not consistent with the Final Stipulation and Order
entered in Nehmer v. United States Veterans Administration, C.A. No. C-
86-6160 (TEH) (N.D. Cal.), and the procedural instructions contained in
Circular 21-94-1, Processing of Claims Based on Exposure to Herbicide
Agents (February 15, 1994). The commenter suggested that the final rule
should specify an effective date for the payment of benefits that
conforms with the Nehmer stipulation.
VA does not concur. 38 U.S.C. 1116(c)(2), which was added by the
Agent Orange Act of 1991, Public Law 102-4, clearly and unambiguously
requires that regulations promulgated as a result of a decision of the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs that a positive association exists
between exposure to herbicides and a specified condition or disease be
effective on the date of issuance, i.e., the date the final rule is
published in the Federal Register. The effective date for this rule
conforms to that statutory mandate.
Further, the commenter recognized that the effective date of this
regulation and the date of entitlement in an individual claim for
benefits are not synonymous. In fact, there is a specific regulatory
framework that governs the assignment of the date of entitlement (See
38 CFR 3.400 through 3.404). In addition, the Final Stipulation and
Order entered in the Nehmer case contains provisions governing
effective dates of entitlement applicable to certain groups of
claimants. VA is bound by these provisions. This notice merely
specifies the effective date of the regulatory amendment and does not
purport to modify provisions governing effective dates of entitlement
contained in regulations or in the Nehmer stipulation.
Under the Nehmer stipulation, when the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs issues regulations under Public Law 102-4 establishing a
presumption of service connection for a disease associated with
herbicide exposure, VA will review herbicide-exposure claims based on
disability or death resulting from that disease which were: (1) Denied
under regulations voided by the court in Nehmer and never finally
decided under a valid regulation, or, (2) filed after the date of the
court's decision and before issuance of the new regulations. Where
benefits are awarded under such reviews, the effective date of
entitlement will be based on the later of the date of receipt of the
claim or the date on which disability or death occurred, subject to the
provisions of 38 U.S.C. 5110 (b)(1) and (d)(1) allowing earlier
effective dates in some cases where claims are filed within one year of
service discharge or death. Under the stipulation, the date of
entitlement may be based on the date of claim, if otherwise
appropriate, without regard to whether the claim was filed prior to
September 25, 1985, the effective date of the voided regulations, if
the claim was denied under those regulations.
As to the suggestion that the regulation restate the provisions
governing effective dates of entitlement found in the Nehmer
stipulation, that stipulation applies to a specific class of claimants
whose claims for benefits based on exposure to dioxin were denied on or
after September 25, 1985, or who have claims pending at the time of
issuance of regulations under Public Law 102-4. This regulation will
apply to a broader class of veterans and dependents, including those
whose claims were denied prior to September 25, 1985, and those who
file claims in the future. Individuals will continue to have specific
rights under the terms of the Nehmer stipulation and it is not
necessary to include them in a regulation of general applicability. To
the extent that class counsel believes that class members are not
sufficiently aware of their rights under the stipulation, the
stipulation provides class counsel with a means to contact class
members concerning their rights.
For those reasons, as well as the fact that the effective date
established by this rule is in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1116(c)(2), VA
finds that it is neither necessary nor appropriate to include
requirements affecting a specific class of claimants in a rule which is
for broader application.
VA appreciates the comment submitted in response to the proposed
rule which is now adopted without change.
The Secretary hereby certifies that this regulatory amendment will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5
U.S.C. 601-612. The reason for this certification is that this
amendment would not directly affect any small entities. Only VA
beneficiaries could be directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this amendment is exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
These regulations have been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget under E.O. 12866.
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers are
64.109 and 64.110.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Handicapped, Health
care, Pensions, Veterans.
Approved: April 28, 1994.
Jesse Brown,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 3--ADJUDICATION
Subpart A--Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A, continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.
2. In Sec. 3.307, paragraph (a)(6)(ii) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 3.307 Presumptive service connection for chronic, tropical or
prisoner-of-war related disease, or disease associated with exposure to
certain herbicide agents; wartime and service on or after January 1,
1947.
(a) * * *
(6) * * *
(ii) The diseases listed at Sec. 3.309(e) shall have become
manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more at any time after service,
except that chloracne or other acneform disease consistent with
chloracne and porphyria cutanea tarda shall have become manifest to a
degree of 10 percent or more within a year, and respiratory cancers
within 30 years, after the last date on which the veteran was exposed
to an herbicide agent during active military, naval, or air service.
* * * * *
Sec. 3.309 [Amended]
3. In Sec. 3.309(e) in the listing of diseases, after the words
``Hodgkin's disease'' and before the words ``Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma'',
add the words ``Multiple myeloma''; and after the words ``Porphyria
cutanea tarda'' and before the words ``Soft-tissue sarcoma (other than
osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, or mesothelioma)'', add
the words ``Respiratory cancers (cancer of the lung, bronchus, larynx,
or trachea)''.
[FR Doc. 94-14124 Filed 6-7-94; 12:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.