Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Carbon Monoxide Contingency Measures
Federal RegisterMay 5, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[NM-20-1-6216; FRL-4879-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
New Mexico; Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Carbon Monoxide Contingency
Measures
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action approves a revision to the New Mexico State
Implementation Plan (SIP) addressing carbon monoxide (CO) contingency
measures and a proposed clean fuel vehicle fleet demonstration project
for Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, outside the boundaries of Indian
lands. The CO contingency measures constitute one of the required
elements of the complete Albuquerque/Bernalillo County CO SIP.
DATES: This final rule will become effective on July 5, 1994 unless
notice is received by June 6, 1994 that someone wishes to submit
adverse or critical comments. If the effective date is delayed, timely
notice will be published in the Federal Register (FR).
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action should be addressed to Mr.
Thomas H. Diggs, Chief, Planning Section, at the EPA Regional Office
listed below. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the
following locations. The interested persons wanting to examine these
documents should make an appointment with the appropriate office at
least twenty-four hours before the visiting day.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Air Programs Branch
(6T-A), 1445 Ross Avenue, suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460.
Albuquerque Environmental Health Department, The City of
Albuquerque, One Civic Plaza Northwest, P.O. Box 1293,Albuquerque, New
Mexico 87103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Sather, Planning Section (6T-
AP), Air Programs Branch, USEPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 655-7258.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, New Mexico, was designated
nonattainment for CO and classified as moderate with a design value
below 12.7 parts per million (ppm.) (specifically 11.1 ppm.), under
sections 107(d)(4)(A) and 186(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), upon
enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990.1 Please
reference 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991) and 57 FR 13498 and 13529
(April 16, 1992). The air quality planning requirements for moderate CO
nonattainment areas with a design value less than or equal to 12.7 ppm.
are set out in subparts one and three of part D, title I of the CAA.
Subpart one contains provisions generally applicable to all
nonattainment areas, and subpart three contains provisions specifically
applicable to CO nonattainment areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\The CAAA of 1990 made significant changes to the air quality
planning requirements for areas that do not meet (or that
significantly contribute to ambient air quality in a nearby area
that does not meet) the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) (see Public Law No. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399). References
herein are to the CAA as amended in 1990, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 5, 1992, the Governor of New Mexico submitted to the
EPA a SIP revision for CO concerning Albuquerque/Bernalillo County that
was intended to satisfy CAA requirements due on November 15, 1992. This
submittal included the 1990 base year CO emissions inventory, the
oxygenated fuels program, and the winter woodburning program. On
November 29, 1993, the EPA published the final approval of the
emissions inventory, oxygenated fuels program, and the winter
woodburning program (58 FR 62535).
This action approves CO contingency measures for Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County, submitted to the EPA by the Governor of New Mexico
by cover letter dated November 12, 1993. This submittal satisfies the
requirement, as per section 172(c)(9) of the CAA, that all
nonattainment area SIPs must contain contingency measures (due November
15, 1993) that are to be implemented if the area fails to make
reasonable further progress (RFP) or to attain the applicable National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) by the applicable date. The
contingency measures are to be implemented immediately after the EPA
determines failure of RFP or attainment of the applicable NAAQS,
without further action by the State or the EPA.
Analysis of City/County Submission
A. Procedural Background
The CAA requires States to observe certain procedural requirements
in developing implementation plans for submission to the EPA. Section
110(a)(2) of the CAA provides that each implementation plan submitted
by a State must be adopted after reasonable notice and public hearing
(see also section 110(l) of the CAA). Also, the EPA must determine
whether a submittal is complete, and therefore warrants further EPA
review and action (see section 110(k)(1) and 57 FR 13565). The EPA's
completeness criteria for SIP submittals are set out at 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V. The EPA attempts to make completeness determinations within
60 days of receiving a submission. However, a submittal is deemed
complete by operation of law if a completeness determination is not
made by the EPA six months after receipt of the submission.
After providing adequate notice, the City of Albuquerque held a
public hearing on October 13, 1993, to entertain public comment on
proposed revisions to the CO SIP narrative, and on proposed revisions
to Regulation 35 addressing CO contingency measures, entitled
Alternative Fuels. Public comments were received and adequately
addressed by the City/County. Following the public hearings, the
revisions to the CO SIP narrative and to Regulation 35 were adopted by
the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board, and
submitted as a SIP revision to the EPA by cover letter from the
Governor dated November 12, 1993.
The SIP revision was reviewed by the EPA to determine completeness
shortly after its submittal, in accordance with the completeness
criteria referenced above. A letter datedDecember 27, 1993, was
forwarded to the Governor indicating the completeness of the submittal
and the next steps to be taken in the review process.
B. Review of CO Contingency Measures
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County filed revisions to Regulation 35 with
the State of New Mexico Records and Archives Center on November 10,
1993. Regulation 35 contains the oxygenated fuel provisions for
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County. The revisions being approved in this
action consist of the implementation of a more stringent oxygenated
fuels program in Bernalillo County beginning November 1, 1996, if the
County does not achieve attainment of the CO NAAQS by December 31, 1995
(i.e., one or more quality assured violations of the CO NAAQS are
recorded in calendar years 1994 and/or 1995). Specifically, the
revisions would require gasoline sold in Bernalillo County during the
winter control period (November 1 to the end of February) to contain
not less than 3.0% oxygen by weight for ethanol blends. The current
program requires not less than 2.7% oxygen by weight for all blends. In
addition, the revisions mandate that as a contingency measure, all
oxygenated fuel would be blended prior to removal by tank truck from
primary supply points (such as refineries and terminals).
C. Review of Proposed Clean Fuel Vehicle Fleet Demonstration Project
The City/County also included in the November 12, 1993, submittal,
a proposed demonstration project to convert certain fleet vehicles
(select medium and heavy duty passenger vans) to alternative fuel use
(e.g., compressed natural gas, electricity). The City/County included a
description of this proposed demonstration project in the revisions to
the CO SIP narrative. The proposed project is expected to show air
quality benefits (e.g., CO tailpipe emission reductions) and fuel cost
savings for natural gas conversions. The EPA in this action is
approving the revisions to the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County CO SIP
narrative to include the proposed clean fuel vehicle fleet
demonstration project discussed above. It is important to note that the
proposed clean fuel vehicle fleet demonstration project is not required
by the EPA, and is not being approved as a contingency measure in the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, New Mexico, SIP. The approval of the
revised CO SIP narrative acknowledges that the City/County is taking
its own initiative in exploring means of obtaining additional, but
undefined, CO emission reductions.
Final Action
This action approves a revision to the New Mexico SIP to include
for Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, outside the boundaries of Indian
lands: (1) CO contingency measures; and (2) a proposed clean fuel
vehicle fleet demonstration project. The CO contingency measures
constitute one of the required elements of the complete Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County CO SIP.
The EPA has reviewed these revisions to the New Mexico SIP and is
approving them as submitted. The EPA is publishing this action without
prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. This action will be
effective July 5, 1994 unless, by June 6, 1994, notice is received that
adverse or critical comments will be submitted.
If such notice is received, this action will be withdrawn before
the effective date by publishing two subsequent documents. One document
will withdraw the final action, and another will begin a new rulemaking
by announcing a proposal of the action and establishing a comment
period. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that
this action will be effective July 5, 1994.
Miscellaneous
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., the EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604).
Alternatively, the EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D, of the
CAA do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements
that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP
approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify that it does
not have a significant impact on any small entities affected. Moreover,
due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the CAA,
preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The
CAA forbids the EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds
(Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (1976); 42
U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 5, 1994. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
Executive Order
This action has been classified as a table two action by the
Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal
Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by an
October 4, 1993, memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant
Administrator for Air and Radiation. A future document will inform the
general public of these revised tables. On January 6, 1989, the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) waived table two and three SIP revisions
(54 FR 2222) from the requirements of section 3 of Executive Order
12291 for a period of two years. The EPA has submitted a request for a
permanent waiver for table two and three SIP revisions. The OMB has
agreed to continue the waiver until such time as it rules on the EPA's
request. This request continues in effect under Executive Order 12866
which superseded Executive Order 12291 on September 30, 1993.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations.
Note: Incorporation by reference of the SIP for the State of New
Mexico was approved by the Director of the Federal Register on July
1, 1982.
Dated: April 20, 1994.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator (6A).
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart GG--New Mexico
2. Section 52.1620 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(57) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1620 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(57) A revision to the New Mexico SIP addressing CO contingency
measures and a proposed clean fuel vehicle fleet demonstration project
for Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, outside the boundaries of Indian
lands, was submitted by the Governor of New Mexico by cover letter
dated November 12, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Regulation Number 35-Alternative
Fuels, Section 35.02, ``Oxygenated Fuels,'' Subsection 35.02(A)(1);
Section 35.03, ``Oxygenated Fuels Procedures Manual;'' and Section
35.06, ``Contingency Measures,'' as filed with the State Records and
Archives Center on November 10, 1993.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) November 12, 1993, narrative plan addressing the Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County CO nonattainment area, including the proposed clean
fuel vehicle fleet demonstration project.
[FR Doc. 94-10757 Filed 5-4-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.