Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews; Correction
Federal RegisterApr 15, 2024
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews; Correction
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION:
Notice; Correction.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published in the
Federal Register
of April 1, 2024, in which Commerce announced the initiation of five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s). That notice listed an incorrect case number in the “Initiation of Review” section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Martin, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3936.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 1, 2024, Commerce published in the
Federal Register
a notice of Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews. In that notice, Commerce incorrectly listed the Commerce case number “DOC Case No.” for Utility Wind Towers (2nd Review) from Vietnam as “A-552-863” when it should have listed “A-552-814.”
Correction
In the
Federal Register
of April 1, 2024, in FR Doc 2024-06793, on page 22374 in the first column, correct the Commerce case number “DOC Case No.” found in the “Initiation of Review” table to “A-552-814” for Utility Wind Towers (2nd Review) from Vietnam.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.218(c).
Dated: April 9, 2024.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2024-07858 Filed 4-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.