Regulatory Agenda
Federal RegisterAug 8, 2022
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Ch. I
Regulatory Agenda
AGENCY:
Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION:
Semiannual regulatory agenda.
SUMMARY:
The following Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regulations are scheduled for development or review during the 6-month period following publication. This agenda carries out OPM's responsibilities to publish a semiannual agenda under Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6). This publication does not impose a binding obligation on OPM with regard to any specific item on the agenda. Regulatory action in addition to the items listed is not precluded.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Hickman, (202) 606-1000.
Stephen Hickman,
Federal Register Liaison.
Office of Personnel Management—Final Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation
Identifier No.
219
Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II
3206-AO29
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT (OPM)
Final Rule Stage
219. Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II [3206-AO29]
Legal Authority:
Pub. L. 116-260, Division BB, title I and title II
Abstract:
This final rule implements provisions related to the independent dispute resolution processes included in the Public Health Service Act sections 2799A-1(c) and 2799A-2(b), as added by sections 102(d), 103 and 105 of the No Surprises Act.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
Interim Final Rule
10/07/21
86 FR 55980
Interim Final Rule Effective
10/07/21
Interim Final Rule Comment Period End
12/06/21
Final Action
06/00/22
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
Yes.
Agency Contact:
Padma Babubhai Shah, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20415,
Phone:
202 606-4056,
Email: padma.shah@opm.gov.
RIN:
3206-AO29
[FR Doc. 2022-14614 Filed 8-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3280-F5-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.