Certain Glass Containers from the People's Republic of China: Amended Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
Federal RegisterJun 1, 2020
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-114]
Certain Glass Containers from the People's Republic of China: Amended Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the preliminary determination in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of certain glass containers (glass containers) from the People's Republic of China (China) to correct certain significant ministerial errors.
DATES:
Applicable June 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lilit Astvatsatrian or Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6412 or (202) 482-3147, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 29, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published in the
Federal Register
the
Preliminary Determination
in the LTFV investigation of glass containers from China.
1
On May 5, 2020, separate rate applicants, Zibo Modern International Co., Ltd (Zibo Modern), Zibo Shelley Trading Co., Ltd (Zibo Shelley), and Zibo Sunfect International Trade Co., Ltd. (Zibo Sunfect) alleged that Commerce made certain ministerial errors in its
Preliminary Determination.
2
On May 7, 2020, the American Glass Packaging Coalition (the petitioner), also submitted ministerial error comments.
3
On May 8, 2020, Guangdong Huaxing Glass Co., Ltd. (Huaxing), rebutted the petitioner's ministerial error comments.
4
1
See Certain Glass Containers From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair-Value, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures,
85 FR 23759 (April 29, 2020) (
Preliminary Determination
).
2
See
Zibo Modern's Letter, “Glass Containers from China—Ministerial Error Comment,” dated May 5, 2020 (Zibo Modern's ME Allegation);
see also
Zibo Shelley's Letter, “Glass Containers from China—Ministerial Error Comment,” dated May 5, 2020 (Zibo Shelley's ME Allegation); and Zibo Sunfect's Letter, “Glass Containers from China—Ministerial Error Comment,” dated May 5, 2020 (Zibo Sunfect's ME Allegation).
3
See
Petitioner's Letter, “
Certain Glass Containers from the People's Republic of China:
Ministerial Error
Comments,” dated May 7, 2020 (Petitioner's ME Allegation).
4
See
Huaxing's Letter, “
Certain Glass Containers China:
Comment on Petitioner's Ministerial Error Allegation,” dated May 8, 2020.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation is January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019.
Scope of Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is glass containers from China. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation,
see
the appendix to this notice.
Legal Authority
When ministerial errors are alleged with respect to preliminary determinations in LTFV investigations, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce will analyze any allegations received and, if appropriate, correct any significant ministerial error by amending the preliminary determination. A ministerial error is defined in 19 CFR 351.224(f) as “an error in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.” A significant ministerial error is defined as a ministerial error, the correction of which, either singly or in combination with other errors, would result in: (1) a change of at least five absolute percentage points in, but not less than 25 percent of, the weighted-average dumping margin calculated in the original (erroneous) preliminary determination; or (2) a difference between a weighted-average dumping
margin of zero or
de minimis
and a weighted-average dumping margin of greater than
de minimis
or vice versa.
5
5
See
19 CFR 351.224(g).
Analysis of Ministerial Error Allegations
Zibo Modern, Zibo Shelley, and Zibo Sunfect allege that Commerce made ministerial errors in identifying certain of their producers in the exporter-producer combinations listed in the
Preliminary Determination
notice (
i.e.,
Commerce used incorrect producer names or omitted certain producers). The petitioner alleges that Commerce failed to convert free-on-board Global Trade Atlas import values that were used as surrogate values into cost, insurance, and freight import values.
We agree with the allegations regarding the producers' names and have listed the correct producers' names (Xuzhou Supengyongxu Glass Products Co., Ltd. and Zibo Shelley Light Industrial Products Co., Ltd.) and included the omitted export-producer combinations for the exporter Zibo Sunfect International Trade Co., Ltd. in the rate table below. However, we find the petitioner's allegation is methodological, rather than ministerial, in nature as it relates to a calculation methodology. Hence, we have not made any changes to the
Preliminary Determination
based upon the petitioner's allegation. For details regarding these decisions,
see
the Ministerial Error Memorandum.
6
6
See
Memorandum, “Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Certain Glass Containers from the People's Republic of China: Allegations of Ministerial Errors in the Preliminary Determination,” dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum).
Commerce's regulations do not permit rebuttals to ministerial error comments with respect to preliminary determinations.
7
Therefore, we have not considered Huaxing's rebuttal comments.
7
See
19 CFR 351.224(c)(3).
Amended Preliminary Determination
Commerce has amended its
Preliminary Determination
to reflect the correct name of Zibo Modern's producer, Xuzhou Supengyongxu Glass Products Co., Ltd., and the correct name of Zibo Shelley's producer, Zibo Shelley Light Industrial Products Co., Ltd., and to add four exporter-producer combinations for the exporter Zibo Sunfect International Trade Co., Ltd. that were inadvertently omitted from the
Preliminary Determination.
The weighted-average dumping margin and cash deposit rate determined in the
Preliminary Determination
for the separate rate recipients, other than the mandatory respondents, apply to the exporter-producer combinations listed below. Specifically, Commerce is amending its
Preliminary Determination
by assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to the exporter-producer combinations listed below:
Producer
Exporter
Estimated
weighted
average
dumping
margin
(percent)
Cash
deposit rate
(adjusted
for subsidy
offsets)
(percent)
Xuzhou Supengyongxu Glass Products Co., Ltd
Zibo Modern International Co., Ltd
13.76
3.22
Zibo Shelley Light Industrial Products Co., Ltd
Zibo Shelley Trading Co., Ltd
13.76
3.22
Deqing Hangxiang Glass Products Co., Ltd
Zibo Sunfect International Trade Co., Ltd
13.76
3.22
Shandong Mounttai Sheng Li Yuan GLA
Zibo Sunfect International Trade Co., Ltd
13.76
3.22
Wendeng Wensheng Glass Co., Ltd
Zibo Sunfect International Trade Co., Ltd
13.76
3.22
Yantai NBC Glass Packaging Co. Ltd
Zibo Sunfect International Trade Co., Ltd
13.76
3.22
Amended Cash Deposits and Suspension of Liquidation
The collection of cash deposits and suspension of liquidation will be revised for the exporter-producer combinations listed in the table above, in accordance with sections 733(d) and (f) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224. Because the rates are decreasing from the
Preliminary Determination,
the amended cash deposit rates will be effective retroactively to April 29, 2020, the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination.
Parties will be notified of this determination, in accordance with sections 733(d) and (f) of the Act.
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we will notify the International Trade Commission of our amended preliminary determination.
Notification to Interested Parties
This amended preliminary determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
Dated: May 22, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is certain glass containers with a nominal capacity of 0.059 liters (2.0 fluid ounces) up to and including 4.0 liters (135.256 fluid ounces) and an opening or mouth with a nominal outer diameter of 14 millimeters up to and including 120 millimeters. The scope includes glass jars, bottles, flasks and similar containers; with or without their closures; whether clear or colored; and with or without design or functional enhancements (including, but not limited to, handles, embossing, labeling, or etching).
Excluded from the scope of the investigation are: (1) Glass containers made of borosilicate glass, meeting United States Pharmacopeia requirements for Type 1 pharmaceutical containers; (2) glass containers without “mold seams,” “joint marks,” or “parting lines;” and (3) glass containers without a “finish” (
i.e.,
the section of a container at the opening including the lip and ring or collar, threaded or otherwise compatible with a type of closure to seal the container's contents, including but not limited to a lid, cap, or cork).
Glass containers subject to the investigation are specified within the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7010.90.5005, 7010.90.5009, 7010.90.5015, 7010.90.5019, 7010.90.5025, 7010.90.5029, 7010.90.5035, 7010.90.5039, 7010.90.5045, 7010.90.5049, and 7010.90.5055. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written
description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2020-11746 Filed 5-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.