30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands
Federal RegisterDec 23, 2016
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5909-N-93]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands
AGENCY:
Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
HUD has submitted the proposed information collection requirement described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of public comment.
DATES:
Comments Due Date:
January 23, 2017.
ADDRESSES:
Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax: 202-395-5806. Email:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Anna P. Guido at
Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov
or telephone 202-402-5535. This is not a toll-free number. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A.
The
Federal Register
notice that solicited public comment on the information collection for a period of 60 days was published on October 24, 2016 81 FR 73130.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
24 CFR 55, Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands.
OMB Approval Number:
2506-0151.
Type of Request:
Extension of currently approved collection.
Form Number:
None.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use:
24 CFR 55 implements decision making procedures prescribed by Executive Order 11988 with which applicants must comply before HUD financial assistance can be approved for projects that are located within floodplains. Records of compliance must be kept.
Respondents
(
i.e.
affected public): Local, state, and tribal governments.
Information collection
Number of
respondents
Frequency
of response
Responses
per annum
Burden hour per response
Annual
burden hours
Hourly cost
per response
Annual cost
Sec. 55.20
275
1
275
8
2,200
$40
$88,000
Sec. 55.21
300
1
300
1
300
40
12,000
Total
575
1
575
Varies
2,500
40
100,000
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology,
e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses. HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: December 16, 2016.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-30920 Filed 12-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.