Inversions and Related Transactions

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9761]

RIN 1545-BM88

Inversions and Related Transactions

AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION:

Final and temporary regulations.

SUMMARY:

This document contains temporary regulations that address transactions that are structured to avoid the purposes of sections 7874 and 367 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and certain post-inversion tax avoidance transactions. These regulations affect certain domestic corporations and domestic partnerships whose assets are directly or indirectly acquired by a foreign corporation and certain persons related to such domestic corporations and domestic partnerships. The text of the temporary regulations also serves as the text of the proposed regulations set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking on this subject in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the

Federal Register

. The final regulations revise and add cross-references to coordinate the application of the temporary regulations.

DATES:

Effective Date:

These regulations are effective on April 8, 2016.

Applicability Dates:

For dates of applicability, see §§ 1.304-7T(e), 1.367(a)-3T(c)(11)(ii), 1.367(b)-4T(h), 1.956-2T(i), 1.7701(l)-4T(h), 1.7874-1T(h)(2), 1.7874-2T(l)(2), 1.7874-3T(f)(2), 1.7874-4T(k)(1), 1.7874-6T(h), 1.7874-7T(h), 1.7874-8T(i), 1.7874-9T(g), 1.7874-10T(i), 1.7874-11T(f), and 1.7874-12T(b).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Regarding the regulations under sections 304, 367, and 7874, Shane M. McCarrick or David A. Levine, (202) 317-6937; regarding the regulations under sections 956 and 7701(l), Rose E. Jenkins, (202) 317-6934 (not toll-free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

I. Overview

This document contains regulations to address transactions commonly referred to as inversions and certain tax avoidance transactions related to inversions. An inversion may take many forms but has been generally described as a transaction that results in a domestic parent corporation of a multinational group being replaced with a foreign parent corporation. Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, General Explanation of Tax Legislation Enacted in the 108th Congress (JCS-5-05) (May 31, 2005) (the JCT Explanation), at 342. An inversion is typically accompanied or followed by certain transactions that are intended “to remove income from foreign operations from the U.S. taxing jurisdiction.” Id. In addition, the “corporate group may derive further advantage from the inverted structure by reducing U.S. tax on U.S.-source income through various earnings stripping or other transactions.” Id.

Section 7874 and the regulations thereunder and § 1.367(a)-3(c) (concerning outbound transfers of domestic stock) are intended to address inversions. As described in Part II.F of this Background section, section 7874 generally applies to a transaction if three conditions are satisfied. When these conditions are satisfied, section 7874 either prevents the use of certain tax attributes to reduce the U.S. federal income tax owed on certain income or gain (inversion gain) recognized in transactions intended to remove foreign operations from the U.S. taxing jurisdiction, or treats the new foreign parent corporation as a domestic corporation for all purposes of the Code. As described in Part II.B.1 of this Background section, in certain inversions, § 1.367(a)-3(c) causes a United States person that is a shareholder of the domestic parent corporation to recognize gain (but not loss) on the exchange of its stock in the domestic corporation.

On September 22, 2014, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS issued Notice 2014-52, 2014-42 I.R.B. 712 (the 2014 notice), which announced the intention to issue regulations described therein to address certain transactions structured to avoid the purposes of section 7874 and § 1.367(a)-3(c) and certain post-inversion tax avoidance transactions. On November 19, 2015, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2015-79, 2015-49 I.R.B. 775 (the 2015 notice), which announced the intention to issue regulations described therein to address certain additional transactions structured to avoid the purposes of section 7874 and § 1.367(a)-3(c) and certain additional post-inversion tax avoidance transactions. This document contains temporary regulations under sections 304, 367, 956, 7701(l), and 7874 of the Code.

The temporary regulations include the rules described in the two notices. Part I of the Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble explains the regulations addressing certain transactions structured to avoid the purposes of section 7874. Part II of the Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble explains the regulations addressing certain post-inversion tax avoidance transactions. In addition, the temporary regulations set forth new rules that address issues that were not discussed in either notice: (i) Rules for identifying a foreign acquiring corporation when a domestic entity acquisition involves multiple steps (described in Part I.A of the Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble); (ii) rules that disregard stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that is attributable to certain prior domestic entity acquisitions (described in Part I.B.3 of the Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble); (iii) rules that require a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) to recognize all realized gain upon certain transfers of assets described in section 351 that shift the ownership of those assets to a related foreign person that is not a CFC (described in Part II.B.3 of the Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble); and (iv) rules clarifying the definition of group income for purposes of the substantial business activities test (described in Part I.D.2 of the Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble). The temporary regulations also contain the rules described in Notice 88-108, 1988-2 C.B. 445; Notice 2008-91, 2008-43 I.R.B. 1001; Notice 2009-10, 2009-5 I.R.B. 419; and Notice 2010-12, 2010-4 I.R.B. 326, concerning the short-term obligation exception from United States property for purposes of section 956.

In addition, the temporary regulations provide a new definitions section under § 1.7874-12T that defines terms commonly used in certain of the regulations under sections 367(b), 956, 7701(l), and 7874. It is expected that future guidance projects will conform the nomenclature used in other portions of the existing section 7874 regulations with the nomenclature used in § 1.7874-12T.

The applicability dates for the rules that previously were announced in the 2014 notice and the 2015 notice are consistent with the dates previously announced. Thus, the rules described in the 2014 notice that address transactions that are structured to avoid the purposes of section 7874 apply to acquisitions completed on or after September 22, 2014, and the rules described in the 2015 notice that address transactions that are structured to avoid the purposes of section 7874 apply to acquisitions completed on or

after November 19, 2015. Furthermore, the rules described in the 2014 notice that reduce the tax benefits of inversion transactions apply to post-inversion tax avoidance transactions completed on or after September 22, 2014, and the rules described in the 2015 notice that reduce the tax benefits of inversion transactions apply to post-inversion tax avoidance transactions completed on or after November 19, 2015. In both cases described in the preceding sentence, subject to one exception, the rules apply only if the inversion transaction was completed on or after September 22, 2014. The one exception is that, consistent with the 2014 notice, the rule described in Part II.B.4 of the Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble regarding the application of section 304(b)(5) is a generally applicable rule that applies without regard to whether there was an inversion transaction.

The new rules included in the temporary regulations, including any changes to rules described in the 2014 notice and the 2015 notice, generally apply to acquisitions or post-inversion tax avoidance transactions completed on or after April 4, 2016. In addition, and consistent with the announcement in the 2014 notice, the new rule described in Part II.B.3 of the Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble that reduces post-inversion tax benefits (by requiring a CFC to recognize all realized gain upon certain section 351 transfers) applies only if the inversion transaction was completed on or after September 22, 2014. However, no inference is intended as to the treatment of transactions described in the temporary regulations and this preamble under the law that applied before the applicability date of these regulations. The IRS may, where appropriate, challenge transactions, including those described in the temporary regulations and this preamble, under applicable Code or regulatory provisions or judicial doctrines.

Comments were received on the 2014 notice. One comment was received on the 2015 notice, but the comment was received after these temporary regulations had been substantially developed such that the Treasury Department and the IRS did not have time to fully consider the comment. The Treasury Department and the IRS will include this comment in the administrative record for the notice of proposed rulemaking on this subject in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the

Federal Register

(REG-135734-14) and fully consider the comment in connection with finalization of the proposed regulations.

II. Statutory and Regulatory Background

A. Section 304

Section 304(a)(1) generally provides that, for purposes of sections 302 and 303, if one or more persons are in control of each of two corporations and, in return for property, one of the corporations (acquiring corporation) acquires stock in the other corporation (issuing corporation) from the person (or persons) so in control, then (unless section 304(a)(2) applies) the property shall be treated as a distribution in redemption of the stock of the acquiring corporation.

Section 304(a)(2) provides that, for purposes of sections 302 and 303, if in return for property, one corporation acquires from a shareholder of another corporation stock in such other corporation, and the issuing corporation controls the acquiring corporation, then the property shall be treated as a distribution in redemption of the stock of the issuing corporation.

Section 304(b)(2) provides that, in the case of any acquisition to which section 304(a) applies, the determination of the amount that is a dividend (and the source thereof) shall be made as if the property were distributed by the acquiring corporation to the extent of its earnings and profits, and then by the issuing corporation to the extent of its earnings and profits.

Section 304(b)(5)(B) limits the earnings and profits taken into account under section 304(b)(2) when the acquiring corporation is foreign. Specifically, section 304(b)(5)(B) provides that no earnings and profits are taken into account for purposes of section 304(b)(2)(A) (and section 304(b)(2)(A) shall not apply) if more than 50 percent of the dividends arising from such acquisition (determined without regard to section 304(b)(5)(B)) would neither be subject to U.S. federal income tax for the taxable year in which the dividends arise, nor be included in the earnings and profits of a CFC.

The Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation's technical explanation of section 304(b)(5)(B) provides:

The provision prevents the foreign acquiring corporation's E&P from permanently escaping U.S. taxation by being deemed to be distributed directly to a foreign person (

i.e.,

the transferor) without an intermediate distribution to a domestic corporation in the chain of ownership between the acquiring corporation and the transferor corporation.

Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, Technical Explanation of the Revenue Provisions of the Senate Amendment to the House Amendment to the Senate Amendment to H.R. 1586, Scheduled for Consideration by the House of Representatives on August 10, 2010 (JCX-46-10) (August 10, 2010), at 28.

Section 304(b)(5)(C) provides that the Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of section 304(b)(5).

B. Section 367

1. Section 367(a)

Subject to certain exceptions, section 367(a)(1) generally provides that if a United States person transfers property to a foreign corporation in an exchange described in section 332, 351, 354, 356, or 361, the foreign corporation shall not be considered a corporation for purposes of determining the extent to which the United States person recognizes gain on the transfer. Section 1.367(a)-3(c) provides an exception to the general rule of section 367(a)(1) for certain transfers by a United States person of stock or securities of a domestic corporation (the U.S. target company) to a foreign corporation. This exception only applies, however, if the U.S. target company complies with the reporting requirements in § 1.367(a)-3(c)(6) and if the four conditions set forth in § 1.367(a)-3(c)(1)(i) through (iv) are satisfied. The condition set forth in § 1.367(a)-3(c)(1)(iv) requires the active trade or business test (as defined in § 1.367(a)-3(c)(3)) to be satisfied, the requirements of which include the substantiality test (as defined in § 1.367(a)-3(c)(3)(iii)). The substantiality test is satisfied if, at the time of the transfer, the fair market value of the transferee foreign corporation is at least equal to the fair market value of the U.S. target company. For this purpose, the fair market value of the transferee foreign corporation generally does not include assets acquired outside the ordinary course of business within the 36-month period preceding the exchange if they produce, or are held for the production of, passive income or are acquired for the principal purpose of satisfying the substantiality test.

2. Section 367(b)

Section 367(b)(1) provides that, in the case of an exchange described in section 332, 351, 354, 355, 356, or 361 in connection with which there is no transfer of property described in section 367(a)(1), a foreign corporation shall be considered to be a corporation except to the extent provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary that are

necessary or appropriate to prevent the avoidance of U.S. federal income taxes. Section 367(b)(2) provides that the regulations prescribed pursuant to section 367(b)(1) shall include (but shall not be limited to) regulations dealing with the sale or exchange of stock or securities in a foreign corporation by a United States person, including regulations providing the circumstances under which gain is recognized or deferred, amounts are included in gross income as a dividend, adjustments are made to earnings and profits, or adjustments are made to the basis of stock or securities.

Regulations under section 367(b) generally provide that, if the potential application of section 1248 cannot be preserved following the acquisition of the stock or assets of a foreign corporation (foreign acquired corporation) by another foreign corporation in an exchange subject to section 367(b), then certain exchanging shareholders of the foreign acquired corporation must include in income as a dividend the section 1248 amount attributable to the stock of the foreign acquired corporation exchanged. See § 1.367(b)-4(b). Under § 1.367(b)-2(c)(1), the section 1248 amount attributable to the stock of a foreign acquired corporation means the net positive earnings and profits (if any) that would have been attributable to such stock and includible in income as a dividend under section 1248 if the stock were sold by the exchanging shareholder.

Specifically, subject to certain exceptions, § 1.367(b)-4(b)(1)(i) requires a deemed dividend inclusion if the exchange satisfies two conditions. First, immediately before the exchange, the exchanging shareholder is either (i) a United States person that is a section 1248 shareholder with respect to the foreign acquired corporation, or (ii) a foreign corporation, and a United States person is a section 1248 shareholder with respect to such foreign corporation and the foreign acquired corporation. See § 1.367(b)-4(b)(1)(i)(A). Second, immediately after the exchange, either (i) the stock received by the exchanging shareholder is not stock in a CFC as to which the United States person described in the preceding sentence is a section 1248 shareholder, or (ii) the foreign acquiring corporation (for this purpose, as defined in § 1.367(b)-4(a)) or the foreign acquired corporation (in the case of an acquisition of the stock of the foreign acquired corporation) is not a CFC as to which the United States person is a section 1248 shareholder. See § 1.367(b)-4(b)(1)(i)(B).

Section 1.367(b)-4(c)(1) provides that a section 1248 amount included in income as a deemed dividend under § 1.367(b)-4(b) is not included as foreign personal holding company income (FPHCI) under section 954(c).

C. Section 954

Section 954 defines foreign base company income (FBCI), which generally is income earned by a CFC that is taken into account in computing the amount that a United States shareholder (within the meaning of section 951(b)) of the CFC must include in income under section 951(a)(1)(A). FBCI includes FPHCI, as defined in section 954(c), which, in turn, generally includes dividends. Section 954(c)(1)(A). However, dividends generally are excluded from FPHCI if they are received from a related person that (i) is a corporation created or organized under the laws of the same foreign country under the laws of which the CFC is created or organized, and (ii) has a substantial part of its assets used in its trade or business located in that foreign country. Section 954(c)(3).

In addition, for certain taxable years, dividends received or accrued from another CFC that is a related person generally are excluded from the FPHCI of a CFC to the extent the dividends are attributable or properly allocable to income of the related person that is neither subpart F income nor income treated as effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Section 954(c)(6). Section 103(b)(1) of the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-222, 120 Stat. 345) added section 954(c)(6), which applied to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 2005, and before January 1, 2009, and to taxable years of United States shareholders with or within which these taxable years of the foreign corporation ended. Subsequently, section 954(c)(6) was amended five times to extend its applicability. Section 304(a) of the Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-343, 122 Stat. 3765); section 751(a) of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-312, 124 Stat. 3296); section 323(a) of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-240, 126 Stat. 2313); section 135(a) of Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (Pub. L. 113-295, 128 Stat. 4010); and section 144 of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-113, 129 Stat. 2242). Currently, section 954(c)(6) applies to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 2005, and before January 1, 2020, and to taxable years of United States shareholders with or within which such taxable years of the foreign corporations end. Section 954(c)(6)(A) provides the Secretary with the authority to prescribe regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out section 954(c)(6), including regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to prevent the abuse of its purposes.

D. Section 956

Section 956 determines the amount that a United States shareholder of a CFC must include in gross income with respect to the CFC under section 951(a)(1)(B). This amount is determined, in part, based on the average amount of United States property held, directly or indirectly, by the CFC at the close of each quarter during its taxable year. Subject to certain exceptions, section 956(c) generally defines United States property to include stock and obligations of United States persons that are related to the CFC. Sections 956(c)(1)(B) and (C) and 956(c)(2)(F) and (L). The term “obligation” is defined in § 1.956-2T(d). Section 956(e) grants the Secretary authority to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of section 956, including regulations to prevent the avoidance of section 956 through reorganizations or otherwise. In addition, section 956(d) grants the Secretary authority to prescribe regulations pursuant to which a CFC that is a pledgor or guarantor of an obligation of a United States person is considered to hold the obligation. Section 1.956-2(c) provides that a CFC that is a direct or indirect pledgor or guarantor of an obligation of a United States person is treated as holding the obligation. Section 3.01(a) of the 2014 notice discusses relevant legislative history of section 956.

E. Section 7701

Section 7701(l) grants the Secretary authority to issue regulations re-characterizing any multiple-party financing transaction as a transaction directly among any two or more of such parties where the Secretary determines that such re-characterization is appropriate to prevent avoidance of any tax imposed under the Code. Section 3.02(a) of the 2014 notice discusses relevant legislative history of section 7701(l).

F. Section 7874

Under section 7874, a foreign corporation (foreign acquiring corporation) generally is treated as a

surrogate foreign corporation under section 7874(a)(2)(B) if pursuant to a plan (or a series of related transactions) three conditions are satisfied. First, the foreign acquiring corporation completes, after March 4, 2003, the direct or indirect acquisition of substantially all of the properties held directly or indirectly by a domestic corporation (domestic entity acquisition). Second, after the domestic entity acquisition, at least 60 percent of the stock (by vote or value) of the foreign acquiring corporation is held by former shareholders of the domestic corporation (former domestic entity shareholders) by reason of holding stock in the domestic corporation (such percentage is referred to at times in this preamble as the “ownership percentage,” and, the fraction used to calculate the ownership percentage is referred to at times in this preamble as the “ownership fraction”). And third, after the domestic entity acquisition, the expanded affiliated group (as defined in section 7874(c)(1)) that includes the foreign acquiring corporation (EAG) does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which, or under the law of which, the foreign acquiring corporation is created or organized (relevant foreign country), when compared to the total business activities of the EAG. Pursuant to section 7874(c)(1), an EAG is an affiliated group defined in section 1504(a), but without regard to the exclusion of foreign corporations in section 1504(b)(3) and using a more-than-50-percent ownership threshold in lieu of the 80-percent ownership threshold in section 1504(a). Similar provisions apply if a foreign acquiring corporation acquires substantially all of the properties constituting a trade or business of a domestic partnership. The domestic corporation or the domestic partnership described in this paragraph is referred to at times in this preamble as the “domestic entity.”

The tax treatment of a domestic entity acquisition in which the EAG does not have substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country varies depending on the level of owner continuity. If the ownership percentage is at least 80, the foreign acquiring corporation is treated as a domestic corporation for all purposes of the Code pursuant to section 7874(b). If, instead, the ownership percentage is at least 60 but less than 80 (in which case the domestic entity acquisition is referred to in this preamble as an “inversion transaction”), the foreign acquiring corporation is respected as a foreign corporation, but, under section 7874(a)(1), the taxable income of the domestic entity and certain related United States persons (referred to as “expatriated entities” and defined in section 7874(a)(2)(A)) for any year that includes any portion of the applicable period shall in no event be less than the inversion gain of the entity for the taxable year. Section 7874(d)(1) defines the term “applicable period” as the period beginning on the first date properties are acquired as part of the domestic entity acquisition, and ending on the date that is 10 years after the last date properties are acquired as part of the domestic entity acquisition. In addition, section 7874(d)(2) generally provides that the term “inversion gain” means the income or gain recognized by reason of the transfer during the applicable period of stock or other properties by an expatriated entity, and any income received or accrued during the applicable period by reason of a license of any property by an expatriated entity, provided the transfer or license takes place as part of the domestic entity acquisition or, under subparagraph (B), after the domestic entity acquisition if the transfer or license is to a foreign related person. Section 7874(d)(2) provides that subparagraph (B) does not apply to property described in section 1221(a)(1) (generally, property that is inventory) in the hands of the expatriated entity.

Section 7874(d)(3) provides that the term “foreign related person” means, with respect to any expatriated entity, a foreign person that is (i) related (within the meaning of section 267(b) or 707(b)(1)) to the entity, or (ii) under the same common control (within the meaning of section 482) as the entity.

Section 7874(e)(2)(A) provides that, in the case of an expatriated entity that is a partnership, section 7874(a)(1) shall apply at the partner rather than the partnership level.

Under section 7874(c)(4), a transfer of properties or liabilities (including by contribution or distribution) is disregarded if the transfer is part of a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid the purposes of section 7874. In addition, section 7874(c)(6) grants the Secretary authority to prescribe regulations as may be appropriate to determine whether a corporation is a surrogate foreign corporation, including regulations to treat stock as not stock. Finally, section 7874(g) grants the Secretary authority to provide regulations necessary to carry out section 7874, including regulations providing for such adjustments to the application of section 7874 as are necessary to prevent the avoidance of the purposes of section 7874, including the avoidance of such purposes through (i) the use of related persons, pass-through or other non-corporate entities, or other intermediaries, or (ii) transactions designed to have persons cease to be (or not become) members of expanded affiliated groups or related persons.

Explanation of Provisions

I. Regulations Addressing Certain Transactions That Are Structured To Avoid the Purposes of Section 7874

This Part I describes rules for (i) identifying domestic entity acquisitions and foreign acquiring corporations in certain multiple-step transactions; (ii) calculating the ownership percentage and, more specifically, disregarding certain stock of the foreign acquiring corporation for purposes of computing the denominator of the ownership fraction and, in addition, taking into account certain non-ordinary course distributions (NOCDs) made by a domestic entity for purposes of computing the numerator of the ownership fraction; (iii) determining when certain stock of a foreign acquiring corporation is treated as held by a member of the EAG; and (iv) determining when an EAG has substantial business activities in a relevant foreign country.

A. Multiple-Step Acquisition of Property of a Domestic Entity

1. Background

Section 1.7874-2(c) provides guidance on the types of transactions that constitute a direct or indirect acquisition by a foreign corporation of properties held directly or indirectly by a domestic entity and that therefore potentially result in a domestic entity acquisition. Section 1.7874-2(c)(1) sets forth a non-exclusive list of the types of transactions that generally result in an indirect acquisition of properties of a domestic entity. In addition, § 1.7874-2(c)(2) provides that when a foreign corporation acquires stock of another foreign corporation, which, in turn, directly or indirectly owns stock or a partnership interest in a domestic entity, the acquisition by the foreign corporation does not constitute an indirect acquisition of any properties held by the domestic entity. Absent § 1.7874-2(c)(2), the foreign corporation's acquisition of the stock of the other foreign corporation would be an indirect acquisition of properties of the domestic entity. However, because the domestic entity had a foreign parent before the acquisition, these types of transactions typically do not give rise to the policy concerns that motivated

Congress to enact section 7874, and therefore they generally are not treated as indirect acquisitions of properties of a domestic entity. This rule does not, however, address multiple related acquisitions of the properties of a domestic entity.

Section 1.7874-2(f) provides a non-exclusive list of stock of a foreign corporation that is described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, stock of the foreign acquiring corporation held by former domestic entity shareholders or former domestic entity partners by reason of holding stock or partnership interests in the domestic entity; at times, referred to in this preamble as “by-reason-of stock”).

2. Transactions at Issue

The Treasury Department and the IRS are concerned that taxpayers may take the position that certain transactions are not domestic entity acquisitions even though the transactions give rise to the policy concerns that motivated Congress to enact section 7874. This could occur, for example, when a foreign corporation (initial acquiring corporation) acquires substantially all of the properties held by a domestic entity (the initial acquisition) in a transaction that does not result in the initial acquiring corporation being treated as a domestic corporation under section 7874(b) (for example, because the ownership percentage is less than 80 or because the EAG purports to meet the substantial business activities exception in § 1.7874-3), and, pursuant to a plan that includes the initial acquisition (or a series of related transactions), another foreign corporation (subsequent acquiring corporation) acquires substantially all of the properties of the initial acquiring corporation (the subsequent acquisition). In these cases, a taxpayer may take the position that the form of the transactions is respected for U.S. federal income tax purposes and that § 1.7874-2(c)(2) prevents the subsequent acquiring corporation from being considered to have indirectly acquired the properties of the domestic entity pursuant to the subsequent acquisition. Under this position, although the initial acquisition would be a domestic entity acquisition and the initial acquiring corporation would be a foreign acquiring corporation, the subsequent acquisition would not be a domestic entity acquisition, and the subsequent acquiring corporation would not be a foreign acquiring corporation. Moreover, for purposes of computing the ownership percentage, a taxpayer may assert that former domestic entity shareholders do not hold stock of the subsequent acquiring corporation by reason of holding stock in the domestic entity and, instead, hold stock of the subsequent acquiring corporation only by reason of holding stock in the initial acquiring corporation.

In certain cases, these positions are contrary to the purposes of section 7874, including the purposes of (i) the third-country rule set forth in § 1.7874-9T (and described in Section B.4 of this Part I), if the subsequent acquiring corporation and the initial acquiring corporation are subject to tax as residents of different foreign countries, or (ii) the substantial business activities exception in § 1.7874-3 if the EAG has substantial business activities in the foreign country in which, or under the laws of which, the initial acquiring corporation is created or organized but does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which, or under the laws of which, the subsequent acquiring corporation is created or organized.

3. Multiple-Step Acquisition Rule

To address the concerns described in Section 2 of this Part I.A, the temporary regulations provide a rule (the multiple-step acquisition rule) that treats the subsequent acquisition as a domestic entity acquisition and the subsequent acquiring corporation as a foreign acquiring corporation. § 1.7874-2T(c)(4)(i). When the multiple-step acquisition rule applies, the temporary regulations treat stock of the subsequent acquiring corporation received, pursuant to the subsequent acquisition, in exchange for stock of the initial acquiring corporation described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, stock of the initial acquiring corporation that, as a result of the initial acquisition, is by-reason-of stock) as stock of the subsequent acquiring corporation held by reason of holding stock in the domestic entity. § 1.7874-2T(f)(1)(iv).

Further, if, pursuant to the same plan (or a series of related transactions), a foreign corporation directly or indirectly acquires substantially all of the properties held by a subsequent acquiring corporation in a transaction that occurs after the subsequent acquisition, the principles of the multiple-step acquisition rule apply to also treat the further acquisition as a domestic entity acquisition and the foreign corporation that made such acquisition as a foreign acquiring corporation. § 1.7874-2T(c)(4)(iii). For example, if, pursuant to a plan, a foreign corporation (F1) acquires substantially all of the properties held by a domestic corporation, followed by another foreign corporation (F2) acquiring substantially all of the properties held by F1, followed, in turn, by another foreign corporation (F3) acquiring substantially all of the properties held by F2, then the multiple-step acquisition rule also would treat F3's acquisition of F2's properties as a domestic entity acquisition and F3 as a foreign acquiring corporation. In such a case, the principles of the multiple-step acquisition rule would apply in a similar manner to treat stock of F3 as by-reason-of stock to the extent the F3 stock is received in exchange for F2 stock that is itself treated as by-reason-of stock under the multiple-step acquisition rule.

The multiple-step acquisition rule applies in a similar manner when the domestic entity is a domestic partnership.

These rules do not affect the application of section 7874 to the initial acquisition. As a result, section 7874 may apply to both the initial acquisition and the subsequent acquisition. In addition, and like other guidance under § 1.7874-2, the multiple-step acquisition rule applies solely for section 7874 purposes. Accordingly, this rule does not modify general tax principles (such as the step-transaction doctrine) or other rules or guidance that may apply to related transactions.

B. Calculation of the Ownership Percentage

1. Clarification of § 1.7874-4T

a. § 1.7874-4T, In General

Under section 7874(c)(2)(B) (statutory public offering rule), stock of a foreign acquiring corporation that is sold in a public offering related to a domestic entity acquisition described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(i) is excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction. The statutory public offering rule furthers the policy that section 7874 is intended to curtail domestic entity acquisitions that “permit corporations and other entities to continue to conduct business in the same manner as they did prior to the inversion.” S. Rep. No. 192, 108th Cong., 1st. Sess., at 142 (2003); JCT Explanation, at 343.

Section 1.7874-4T modifies the statutory public offering rule. The preamble to § 1.7874-4T provides that “the IRS and the Treasury Department believe that stock of the foreign acquiring corporation transferred in exchange for certain property in a transaction related to the acquisition, but not through a public offering, presents the same opportunity to inappropriately reduce the ownership fraction.” TD 9654, published on January 17, 2014, in the

Federal Register

(79 FR 3094, at 3095).

Accordingly, § 1.7874-4T(b) provides that, subject to a de minimis exception, “disqualified stock” is not included in the denominator of the ownership fraction. Disqualified stock generally includes stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that is transferred to a person (other than the domestic entity) in exchange for “nonqualified property.” The term “nonqualified property” means (i) cash or cash equivalents, (ii) marketable securities, (iii) certain obligations (for example, obligations owed by members of the EAG), or (iv) any other property acquired in a transaction (or series of transactions) related to the domestic entity acquisition with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874. This preamble refers at times to the property described in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of the preceding sentence collectively as “specified nonqualified property” and to the property described in clause (iv) as “avoidance property.” For this purpose, the term “marketable securities” has the meaning set forth in section 453(f)(2), except that the term does not include stock of a corporation or an interest in a partnership that becomes a member of the EAG in a transaction (or series of transactions) related to the domestic entity acquisition, unless a principal purpose for acquiring such stock or partnership interest is to avoid the purposes of section 7874.

b. Clarification

Section 2.03(b) of the 2015 notice provides that § 1.7874-4T will be clarified in certain respects. The temporary regulations implement these clarifications. Accordingly, with respect to the definition of nonqualified property, the temporary regulations clarify that avoidance property means any property (other than specified nonqualified property) acquired with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874, regardless of whether the transaction involves an indirect transfer of specified nonqualified property. See § 1.7874-4T(j),

Example 3.

Second, the temporary regulations remove the phrase “in a transaction (or series of transactions) related to the acquisition” from the definition of avoidance property. See § 1.7874-4T(i)(7)(iv). Third, the temporary regulations remove the phrase “unless a principal purpose for acquiring such stock or partnership interest is to avoid the purposes of section 7874” from the definition of “marketable securities.” See § 1.7874-4T(i)(6). Finally, the temporary regulations clarify

Example 1

and

Example 2

of § 1.7874-4T(j) by including a reference to section 7874(c)(4).

In addition, the temporary regulations update the de minimis exception in § 1.7874-4T(d)(1) to reflect the passive assets rule (described in Section 2 of this Part I.B) and the NOCD rule (described in Section 5 of this Part I.B), and to also conform the exception to the de minimis exceptions in §§ 1.7874-7T(c) and 1.7874-10T(d).

2. Passive Assets Rule

a. Overview of the 2014 Notice

Section 2.01(b) of the 2014 notice announced that future regulations would include a rule (the passive assets rule) that would exclude from the denominator of the ownership fraction stock of a foreign acquiring corporation that is attributable to certain passive assets, but only if, after the domestic entity acquisition and all related transactions are complete, more than 50 percent of the gross value of all foreign group property constitutes certain passive assets (referred to in the notice and temporary regulations as “foreign group nonqualified property”). See Section b of this Part I.B.2 for the definition of foreign group property and foreign group nonqualified property. The temporary regulations implement the passive assets rule described in the 2014 notice, subject to the modifications described in Section c of this Part I.B.2.

The 2014 notice provides that the amount of stock that will be excluded under the passive assets rule is equal to the product of (i) the value of the stock of the foreign acquiring corporation, other than stock that is described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, by-reason-of stock) and stock that is excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction under either § 1.7874-1(b) (because it is held by a member of the EAG) or § 1.7874-4T(b) (because it is disqualified stock); and (ii) the foreign group nonqualified property fraction. The numerator of the foreign group nonqualified property fraction is the gross value of all foreign group nonqualified property, and the denominator is the gross value of all foreign group property. However, property received by the foreign acquiring corporation that gives rise to stock that is excluded from the ownership fraction under § 1.7874-4T(b) is excluded from both the numerator and the denominator of the foreign group nonqualified property fraction, as applicable.

In addition, the 2014 notice provides that the passive assets rule will incorporate the principles of § 1.7874-4T(h) (regarding the interaction of the EAG rules with the rule that excludes disqualified stock from the denominator of the ownership fraction) with respect to stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that is excluded under the passive assets rule.

b. Foreign Group Property and Foreign Group Nonqualified Property

The 2014 notice provides that foreign group property means any property (including property that gives rise to disqualified stock upon application of § 1.7874-4T) held by the EAG after the domestic entity acquisition and all transactions related to that acquisition are complete, other than the following property: (i) Property that is directly or indirectly acquired in the domestic entity acquisition and that, at the time of the domestic entity acquisition, was held directly or indirectly by the domestic entity; and (ii) to avoid double counting, stock or a partnership interest in a member of the EAG and an obligation described in § 1.7874-4T(i)(7)(iii)(A) (that is, an obligation of a member of the EAG).

With respect to foreign group nonqualified property, the 2014 notice provides that the term generally means foreign group property that is described in § 1.7874-4T(i)(7) other than property that gives rise to income described in section 1297(b)(2)(A) (the banking exception under the passive foreign investment company (PFIC) rules) or section 954(h) or (i) (subpart F exceptions for qualified banking or financing income and for qualified insurance income, respectively), determined by substituting the term “foreign corporation” for the term “controlled foreign corporation.” In addition, a special rule treats certain property (referred to as “substitute property”) that would not be foreign group nonqualified property under the general rule as foreign group nonqualified property if, in a transaction related to the acquisition, such property is acquired in exchange for other property that would be foreign group nonqualified property under the general rule.

Section 4.01(b)(i) of the 2015 notice modifies the general definition of foreign group nonqualified property to also exclude from that definition property that gives rise to income described in section 1297(b)(2)(B) (the PFIC insurance exception). Further, section 4.01(b)(ii) of the 2015 notice provides that the general definition of foreign group nonqualified property does not include property (i) held by a domestic corporation that is subject to tax as an insurance company under subchapter L, provided that the property

is required to support, or is substantially related to, the active conduct of an insurance business; or (ii) that gives rise to income described in section 954(h), determined by substituting the term “domestic corporation” for the term “controlled foreign corporation,” and without regard to the phrase “located in a country other than the United States” in section 954(h)(3)(A)(ii)(I) and without regard to any inference that the tests in section 954(h) should be calculated or determined without taking into account transactions with customers located in the United States. In all three of these cases, however, the special rule for substitute property could still apply.

c. Regulations Implementing the Passive Assets Rule

Section 1.7874-7T sets forth the passive assets rule as described in the 2014 notice and the 2015 notice, subject to certain modifications, in part, to address comments received.

i. De Minimis Exception

A comment noted that certain rules described in the 2014 notice could cause section 7874 to apply to a domestic entity acquisition even though the former domestic entity shareholders or former domestic entity partners, as applicable, actually own no, or only a de minimis amount of, stock in the foreign acquiring corporation after the domestic entity acquisition. In the context of the passive assets rule this could occur, for example, if a foreign acquiring corporation, which holds only cash that does not give rise to disqualified stock under § 1.7874-4T, acquires the stock of the domestic entity in exchange for a portion of the cash and a small amount of stock of the foreign acquiring corporation. Because the foreign group property would be comprised entirely of the remaining cash held by the foreign acquiring corporation, 100 percent of the gross value of all foreign group property would constitute foreign group nonqualified property. Accordingly, absent a de minimis exception, all of the stock of the foreign acquiring corporation, other than stock described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, by-reason-of stock), would be excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction pursuant to the passive assets rule, resulting in an ownership fraction of 100 percent. In response to the comment, and for reasons similar to the reasons for the de minimis exceptions in § 1.7874-4T and the NOCD rule (described in Section 5 of this Part I.B), the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that there should be a de minimis exception to the passive assets rule.

Accordingly, § 1.7874-7T(c) provides a de minimis exception when two requirements are satisfied: (i) First, the ownership percentage—determined without regard to the application of the passive assets rule, § 1.7874-4T(b), and the NOCD rule (described in Section 5 of this Part I.B)—is less than five (by vote and value); and (ii) second, on the date that the domestic entity acquisition and all transactions related to the domestic entity acquisition are complete (the completion date), former domestic entity shareholders or former domestic entity partners, as applicable, in the aggregate, own (applying the attribution rules of section 318(a) with the modifications described in section 304(c)(3)(B)) less than five percent (by vote and value) of the stock of (or a partnership interest in) each member of the EAG.

ii. Assets Upstream of the Foreign Acquiring Corporation

The 2014 notice would treat property held by an EAG member as foreign group property regardless of whether the foreign acquiring corporation directly or indirectly owned an interest in the property. Thus, in cases in which the foreign acquiring corporation is not the common parent of the EAG, the 2014 notice could treat property as foreign group property even though the value of the property is not reflected in the value of the stock of the foreign acquiring corporation.

The Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that foreign group property should not include property held by EAG members if the value of such property is not reflected in the value of the stock of the foreign acquiring corporation. In order to effectuate this policy, the temporary regulations limit foreign group property to property held by members of the “modified expanded affiliated group.” See § 1.7874-7T(f)(2) (defining foreign group property). When the foreign acquiring corporation is not the common parent corporation, the modified EAG is the EAG redetermined as if the foreign acquiring corporation were the common parent corporation. See § 1.7874-7T(f)(4) (defining modified expanded affiliated group).

In connection with this change, the temporary regulations also modify the definition of foreign group property provided in the 2014 notice to exclude only stock or partnership interests in members of the modified EAG and obligations of such members, since the issue of double-counting only arises with respect to those interests.

iii. Certain Nonqualified Property That Gives Rise to Disqualified Stock

A comment questioned whether, for purposes of the more-than-50-percent threshold test, foreign group property should include certain nonqualified property (within the meaning of § 1.7874-4T(i)(7)) received by the EAG in a transaction related to the domestic entity acquisition. In particular, the comment noted that nonqualified property received by the EAG in such a transaction may (i) if received in exchange for stock of the foreign acquiring corporation, give rise to disqualified stock (within the meaning of § 1.7874-4T(c)) that is excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction under § 1.7874-4T(b), and (ii) because such property is foreign group nonqualified property, increase the likelihood that the more-than-50-percent threshold will be exceeded and thus that additional stock of the foreign acquiring corporation will be excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction under the passive assets rule.

The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the more-than-50-percent threshold test should apply without regard to whether all or a portion of the foreign group nonqualified property was received in a transaction related to the domestic entity acquisition. The more-than-50-percent threshold test is an on-off switch that is intended to determine whether, after the domestic entity acquisition and all related transactions are complete, a majority of the value of the stock of the foreign acquiring corporation is attributable to nonqualified property; other aspects of the passive assets rule coordinate its operation with the other anti-abuse rules under section 7874. Accordingly, the temporary regulations confirm that, for purposes of the more-than-50-percent threshold test, foreign group property includes nonqualified property that gives rise to disqualified stock that is excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction pursuant to § 1.7874-4T(b). See § 1.7874-7T(f)(2). However, as is the case under the 2014 notice, § 1.7874-7T(b) does not exclude from the denominator of the ownership fraction any stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that is attributable to such property. See § 1.7874-7T(f)(3). Stock attributable to such property is instead excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction under § 1.7874-4T(b).

iv. Valuing Foreign Group Property

A comment recommended providing a safe harbor to facilitate the valuation

of foreign group property. The comment noted that the value of certain property, particularly illiquid property, may be difficult or costly to determine, especially in the case of a foreign acquiring corporation that is not publicly traded.

After considering this comment, the Treasury Department and the IRS decline to provide such a safe harbor. A domestic entity acquisition is likely to be an infrequent occurrence for a foreign acquiring corporation. Furthermore, as a general matter, the value of foreign group property must be established in order to determine the amount of stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that must be provided in the domestic entity acquisition. Therefore, it should not be unduly burdensome to determine the aggregate gross value of foreign group property and foreign group nonqualified property.

v. Exclusions From General Definition of Foreign Group Nonqualified Property

A comment requested that the regulations clarify that the exclusions from the general definition of foreign group nonqualified property for certain property that gives rise to income described in section 954(h) or (i) apply regardless of whether section 954(h) or (i) sunset. However, section 128 of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-113, 129 Stat. 2242) made sections 954(h) and (i) permanent. Therefore, this comment is no longer relevant and is not adopted.

Another comment requested that the Treasury Department and the IRS clarify that references in the regulations to section 954(h) or (i) or section 1297(b)(2)(A) or (B) incorporate the principles of any regulations or other guidance issued pursuant to those Code sections. In this regard, the Treasury Department and the IRS note that as a general matter, unless otherwise indicated, a reference in a regulation to a Code section implicitly includes any regulations or other guidance issued pursuant to that Code section. Accordingly, the comment is not adopted.

vi. Treatment of Partnerships

The 2014 notice did not explicitly address the treatment of partnerships under the passive assets rule. Similar to § 1.7874-4T(g), the temporary regulations provide that, if one or more members of an EAG (for this purpose, taking into account only members of the modified EAG as described in Section ii of this Part I.B.2.c) own, in the aggregate, more than 50 percent (by value) of the interests in a partnership, then, for purposes of the passive assets rule, the partnership is treated as a corporation that is a member of the EAG (deemed corporation rule). See § 1.7874-7T(d).

The temporary regulations implementing the passive assets rule do not include a rule analogous to that provided in § 1.7874-3(e)(1), which treats certain corporate partners of a partnership that owns stock of a foreign acquiring corporation as members of the EAG for purposes of applying the substantial business activities test. Such a rule is not necessary because, as described in Section ii of this Part I.B.2.c, assets that are upstream of the foreign acquiring corporation are not taken into account as foreign group property for purposes of applying the passive assets rule.

3. Acquisitions of Multiple Domestic Entities

a. Transactions at Issue

The Treasury Department and the IRS are concerned that a single foreign acquiring corporation may avoid the application of section 7874 by completing multiple domestic entity acquisitions over a relatively short period of time, in circumstances where section 7874 would otherwise have applied if the acquisitions had been made at the same time or pursuant to a plan (or series of related transactions). In these situations, the value of the foreign acquiring corporation increases to the extent it issues stock in connection with each successive domestic entity acquisition, thereby enabling the foreign acquiring corporation to complete another, potentially larger, domestic entity acquisition to which section 7874 will not apply. In some cases, a substantial portion of the value of a foreign acquiring corporation may be attributable to its completion of multiple domestic entity acquisitions over the span of just a few years, with that value serving as a platform to complete still larger subsequent domestic entity acquisitions that avoid the application of section 7874. That is, the ownership percentage determined with respect to a subsequent domestic entity acquisition may be less than 60, or less than 80, if the shares of the foreign acquiring corporation issued in prior domestic entity acquisitions are respected as outstanding (thus, included in the denominator but not the numerator) when determining the ownership fraction.

Section 7874 is intended to address transactions in which a domestic parent corporation of a multinational group is replaced with a foreign parent corporation while “permit[ting] corporations and other entities to continue to conduct business in the same manner as they did prior to the inversion.” S. Rep. No. 192, at 142 (2003); JCT Explanation, at 343. To further this policy, various rules under section 7874 exclude from the denominator of the ownership fraction stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that otherwise would inappropriately reduce the ownership fraction. For example, the statutory public offering rule of section 7874(a)(2)(B) excludes from the denominator of the ownership fraction stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that is sold for cash in a public offering related to the domestic entity acquisition. For the same reason, rules under §§ 1.7874-4T and 1.7874-7T exclude from the denominator of the ownership fraction certain stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that is transferred in exchange for, or otherwise attributable to, passive assets or other nonqualified property.

The Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that it is not consistent with the purposes of section 7874 to permit a foreign acquiring corporation to reduce the ownership fraction for a domestic entity acquisition by including stock issued in connection with other recent domestic entity acquisitions. Moreover, the Treasury Department and the IRS do not believe that the application of section 7874 in these circumstances should depend on whether there was a demonstrable plan to undertake the subsequent domestic entity acquisition at the time of the prior domestic entity acquisitions. Therefore, and consistent with the policies underlying the other stock exclusion rules under section 7874, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that was issued in connection with certain prior domestic entity acquisitions occurring within a 36-month look-back period should be excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction.

b. Disregard of Stock Attributable to Certain Domestic Entity Acquisitions

To address these concerns, the temporary regulations provide a rule under section 7874(c)(6) and (g) that, for purposes of calculating the ownership percentage by value with respect to a domestic entity acquisition (the relevant domestic entity acquisition), excludes from the denominator of the ownership fraction stock of the foreign acquiring corporation attributable to certain prior domestic entity acquisitions. This rule (the multiple domestic entity

acquisition rule) applies if, within the 36-month period ending on the signing date with respect to the relevant domestic entity acquisition, the foreign acquiring corporation (or a predecessor) completed one or more other domestic entity acquisitions that are not excluded under an exception (each such other domestic entity acquisition, a prior domestic entity acquisition). For this purpose, the signing date is the first date on which the contract to effect the relevant domestic entity acquisition is binding, or if another binding contract to effect a substantially similar acquisition was terminated with a principal purpose of avoiding section 7874, the first date on which such other contract was binding. In general, a domestic entity acquisition is excluded from the definition of a prior domestic entity acquisition if (i) the ownership percentage with respect to such domestic entity acquisition was less than five, and (ii) the fair market value of the by-reason-of stock received by the former domestic entity shareholders or former domestic entity partners did not exceed $50 million.

In general, the amount of foreign acquiring corporation stock that is excluded under the multiple domestic entity acquisition rule is based on the current value of the shares of foreign acquiring corporation stock that were issued in the prior domestic entity acquisition, adjusted to reflect intervening redemptions of stock as well as certain other changes in the capital structure of the foreign acquiring corporation. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that this approach, which takes into account subsequent fluctuations in value attributable to the prior domestic entity acquisition, best reflects the policies underlying section 7874, including the ownership fraction.

The temporary regulations provide a three-step process to determine the excluded amount for each prior domestic entity acquisition. First, the total number of shares of stock of the foreign acquiring corporation, within each separate share class (relevant share class), that was described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) as a result of the prior domestic entity acquisition (without regard to whether the 60 percent test of section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) was satisfied) must be calculated (total number of prior acquisition shares). For this purpose, it is not relevant whether a share is outstanding at the time of the relevant domestic entity acquisition.

Second, for each relevant share class, the total number of prior acquisition shares must be adjusted to account for redemptions (within the meaning of section 317(b)) of shares that occur during the redemption testing period (each such share, a redeemed share) and that are attributed, on a pro rata basis, to the prior acquisition shares. In general, the redemption testing period is the period beginning on the day after the completion date of the prior domestic entity acquisition and ending on the day prior to the completion date of the relevant domestic entity acquisition (the general redemption testing period). § 1.7874-8T(e)(1). The number of redeemed shares is then multiplied by the redemption fraction (such product, the allocable redeemed shares). § 1.7874-8T(d)(1). The numerator of the redemption fraction is generally the total number of prior acquisition shares, and the denominator is the sum of: (i) The number of outstanding shares of the foreign acquiring corporation stock as of the end of the last day of the redemption testing period, and (ii) the number of redeemed shares during the redemption testing period.

By ending the redemption testing period on the day prior to the completion date of the relevant domestic entity acquisition, shares issued on such completion date would not dilute the portion of a prior redemption that is allocated to the prior acquisition shares. However, to prevent other stock issuances that occur after a particular redemption from diluting the amount of allocable redeemed shares, a foreign acquiring corporation may establish a reasonable method for dividing the general redemption testing period into shorter periods (each such shorter period, a redemption testing period). § 1.7874-8T(e)(2). In these cases, to account for the fact that the total number of prior acquisition shares is reduced by the allocable redeemed shares for each redemption testing period, the numerator of the redemption fraction for a redemption testing period is the total number of prior acquisition shares less the sum of the number of allocable redeemed shares for prior redemption testing periods. § 1.7874-8T(d)(2)(i).

Finally, for each relevant share class, the total number of prior acquisition shares, reduced to take into account redemptions, is multiplied by the fair market value of a single share of stock of the relevant share class, as of the completion date of the relevant domestic entity acquisition (such product, an excluded amount). § 1.7874-8T(c). The total amount of stock of the foreign acquiring corporation excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction is the sum of the excluded amounts computed separately with respect to each prior domestic entity acquisition and each relevant share class. § 1.7874-8T(b).

The temporary regulations also require appropriate adjustments to be made to take into account changes in a foreign acquiring corporation's capital structure to ensure that the amount of stock excluded under the multiple domestic entity acquisition rule properly reflects the value attributable to prior domestic entity acquisitions. See § 1.7874-8T(f).

The multiple domestic entity acquisition rule applies after taking into account the rule in § 1.7874-2(e). The rule in § 1.7874-2(e) applies when a foreign acquiring corporation completes two or more domestic entity acquisitions pursuant to a plan (or series of related transactions). In such a case, for purposes of section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii), the acquisitions are treated as a single acquisition, and the domestic entities are treated as a single domestic entity. Thus, for example, if two acquisitions that would separately qualify as a relevant domestic entity acquisition and a prior domestic entity acquisition are subject to § 1.7874-2(e), they are treated as a single acquisition and, as a result, would not be subject to the multiple domestic entity acquisition rule. Similarly, if two acquisitions that would separately be treated as two prior domestic entity acquisitions are subject to § 1.7874-2(e), they are treated as a single prior domestic entity acquisition for purposes of applying the multiple domestic entity acquisition rule.

4. Third-Country Rule

a. Background

Section 2.02(b) of the 2015 notice announces that the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to issue regulations providing a rule (the third-country rule) that will apply to certain domestic entity acquisitions in which a domestic entity combines with an existing foreign corporation under a foreign parent corporation that is a tax resident of a “third country” (that is, a foreign country other than the foreign country of which the existing foreign corporation is subject to tax as a resident). The 2015 notice provides that the third-country rule will apply when four requirements are satisfied. First, in a transaction (referred to in the 2015 notice as a “foreign target acquisition” but in this preamble and the temporary regulations as a “foreign acquisition”) related to the domestic entity acquisition, the foreign acquiring corporation directly or indirectly acquires substantially all of the

properties held directly or indirectly by another foreign corporation (the acquired foreign corporation). Second, the gross value of all property directly or indirectly acquired by the foreign acquiring corporation in the foreign acquisition exceeds 60 percent of the gross value of all foreign group property, other than foreign group nonqualified property, held by the EAG on the completion date (the gross value requirement). Third, the tax residence of the foreign acquiring corporation is not the same as that of the acquired foreign corporation, as determined before the foreign acquisition and any related transaction (the tax residency requirement). And fourth, the ownership percentage, determined without regard to the third-country rule, must be at least 60 but less than 80 (the domestic entity ownership requirement). As explained in Section b of this Part II.B.4, the temporary regulations retain the first, third, and fourth requirements described in the 2015 notice but replace the second requirement with a new requirement.

When these requirements are satisfied, the 2015 notice provides that the third-country rule will exclude from the denominator of the ownership fraction stock of the foreign acquiring corporation held by former shareholders of the acquired foreign corporation by reason of holding stock in the acquired foreign corporation (based on the principles of section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii), which describes by-reason-of stock).

b. Regulations Implementing the Third-Country Rule

Section 1.7874-9T sets forth the third-country rule as described in the 2015 notice, subject to certain modifications.

The temporary regulations replace the gross value requirement contained in the 2015 notice with a continuity of interest requirement (referred to as the “foreign ownership percentage”). See § 1.7874-9T(d)(3) and (4). In general, this requirement is satisfied if at least 60 percent of the stock (by vote or value) of the foreign acquiring corporation is held by former shareholders of the acquired foreign corporation by reason of holding stock in the acquired foreign corporation, as determined under the principles of section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii), with certain modifications. § 1.7874-9T(e)(3) and (4). For this purpose, stock of the foreign acquiring corporation held by former domestic entity shareholders (or former domestic entity partners) is not taken into account. See § 1.7874-9T(e)(3)(i). Because a domestic entity acquisition is disregarded for this purpose, it does not dilute the foreign ownership percentage. The temporary regulations implement this modification by requiring that there be a covered foreign acquisition, generally defined as a transaction in which there is an acquisition of substantially all of the properties of a foreign corporation (that is, a foreign acquisition) and in which the foreign ownership percentage is at least 60. This modification aligns the requirements for the third-country rule with the principles of section 7874.

The temporary regulations generally retain the domestic entity ownership and tax residency requirements as described in the 2015 notice. However, the temporary regulations clarify the application of the tax residency requirement by providing that the tax residency of the foreign acquiring corporation is determined after the covered foreign acquisition and all related transactions, and that the tax residency of the acquired foreign corporation is determined before the covered foreign acquisition and all related transactions.

5. Non-Ordinary Course Distributions (NOCD) Rule

a. Overview

The 2014 notice announced that the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to include in future regulations under section 7874 a rule (the NOCD rule) that disregards certain distributions made by a domestic entity before being acquired by a foreign acquiring corporation that otherwise would reduce the numerator of the ownership fraction. Specifically, section 2.02(b) of the 2014 notice provides that, for purposes of applying section 7874(c)(4), NOCDs made by the domestic entity (including a predecessor) during the 36-month period ending on the completion date will be treated as part of a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid the purposes of section 7874.

The 2014 notice defines NOCDs as the excess of all distributions made during a taxable year by the domestic entity with respect to its stock or partnership interests, as applicable, over 110 percent of the average of such distributions during the thirty-six month period immediately preceding such taxable year. The 2014 notice defines distribution, in relevant part, to mean any distribution, regardless of whether it is treated as a dividend or whether, for example, it qualifies under section 355.

Section 4.02(b) of the 2015 notice provides that the future regulations incorporating the NOCD rule will include a de minimis exception. The 2015 notice provides that this exception, similar to the de minimis exception in § 1.7874-4T(d)(1), will apply to an acquisition that satisfies two requirements. First, the ownership percentage—determined without regard to § 1.7874-4T(b) (which disregards certain stock of the foreign acquiring corporation received in exchange for nonqualified property), the passive assets rule, and the NOCD rule—must be less than five (by vote and value). Second, after the domestic entity acquisition and all transactions related to the acquisition are complete, former domestic entity shareholders or former domestic entity partners, as applicable, of the domestic entity, in the aggregate, must own (applying the attribution rules of section 318(a) with the modifications described in section 304(c)(3)(B)) less than five percent (by vote and value) of the stock of (or a partnership interest in) any member of the EAG.

The 2015 notice provides that, when a domestic entity acquisition satisfies the requirements of the de minimis exception, no distributions will be treated as NOCDs that are disregarded under the NOCD rule. The 2015 notice further provides, however, that even when a domestic entity acquisition satisfies the requirements of the de minimis exception, distributions that are part of a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid the purposes of section 7874, determined without regard to the NOCD rule, will nevertheless be disregarded under section 7874(c)(4).

Further, the 2014 notice provides that § 1.367(a)-3(c) (concerning outbound transfers of stock or securities of a domestic corporation) will be modified to include a rule that incorporates the principles of the NOCD rule for purposes of the substantiality test, which, in general, requires that the value of the foreign acquiring corporation be equal to or greater than the value of the domestic target corporation.

b. Regulations Implementing the NOCD Rule

Section 1.7874-10T sets forth the NOCD rule as described in the 2014 notice and the 2015 notice, subject to certain modifications, in part, to address comments received. Section 1.367(a)-3T(c)(3)(iii)(C) sets forth a similar rule for purposes of the substantiality test under § 1.367(a)-3(c).

i. In General

Section 1.7874-10T(b) generally provides that, for purposes of determining the ownership percentage by value, former domestic entity shareholders or former domestic entity partners, as applicable, are deemed to receive, by reason of holding stock or an interest in the domestic entity, an

amount of stock of the foreign acquiring corporation with a fair market value equal to the aggregate value of NOCDs made by the domestic entity (NOCD stock). Thus, similar to the rule under § 1.7874-2(h)(1) (regarding the treatment of options for purposes of determining the ownership percentage), the NOCD rule does not apply for purposes of determining the ownership percentage by vote. Similar to the rule addressing voting power in § 1.7874-2(h)(2), however, section 7874(c)(4) will nonetheless disregard distributions for purposes of determining the ownership percentage by vote that, without regard to the NOCD rule, are part of a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid the purposes of section 7874.

The temporary regulations provide, consistent with the approach recommended in comments received, that the amount of a distribution (including with respect to property distributed in redemption of stock) is determined based on the value of the property distributed at the time of the distribution. See § 1.7874-10T(b). Accordingly, post-distribution fluctuations in the value of the stock or interests of the domestic entity, as applicable, or the value of the distributed property (for example, in the case of a spin-off), do not affect the amount of NOCD stock that is deemed received. A comment suggested additional guidance on valuing the stock of controlled corporations in spin-off transactions. The temporary regulations do not provide new guidance on this issue, which extends beyond the scope of the NOCD rule.

A comment generally recommended that, for purposes of determining the extent to which NOCD stock is deemed received, the NOCD rule should take into account the mix of stock and non-stock consideration provided by a foreign acquiring corporation. For example, if the foreign acquiring corporation acquires a domestic entity in exchange for 60 percent stock and 40 percent cash, the comment recommended that only 60 percent of the additional consideration deemed received under the NOCD rule would be treated as consisting of NOCD stock (with the remaining 40 percent of the additional consideration treated as consisting of cash and, to this extent, not increasing the ownership percentage). The same comment indicated that, under such an approach, additional guidance would be needed in certain cases in which a domestic entity had multiple classes of stock outstanding, particularly where the foreign acquiring corporation does not have a similar capital structure.

The NOCD rule is intended to address transactions in which a taxpayer elects to reduce its size by making distributions outside of the ordinary course to shareholders in order to reduce the amount of foreign acquiring stock that would have to be provided to such shareholders in a subsequent domestic entity acquisition. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the mix of additional consideration that would have been provided in the subsequent domestic entity acquisition but for the NOCDs could differ from the mix of consideration that was actually provided in the domestic entity acquisition. This could occur, for example, due to limitations on the amount of cash that the foreign acquiring corporation was financially capable of providing. It is in fact this type of limitation that could motivate a domestic entity to make NOCDs in order to reduce the ownership percentage, rather than relying on cash consideration provided by the foreign acquiring corporation. In addition, the Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that determining the hypothetical mix of consideration that would have been provided in the absence of NOCDs would give rise to significant administrative complexities. Accordingly, the temporary regulations do not adopt this comment, and, therefore, also do not provide guidance specific to cases where a domestic entity has, or had, multiple classes of stock outstanding.

A comment also requested clarification that the NOCD rule does not establish a safe harbor with respect to the application of section 7874(c)(4). Specifically, the comment requested clarification that, when a distribution is not disregarded under the NOCD rule, the distribution may nevertheless be disregarded under section 7874(c)(4) if, without regard to the NOCD rule, it was made with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874. The temporary regulations confirm that this is the case. See § 1.7874-10T(c). In addition, and also in response to a comment, the temporary regulations clarify that, when only a portion of a distribution is treated as an NOCD, the NOCD rule does not create a presumption that the remaining portion of the distribution was made with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874. See id. The remaining portion must be analyzed under section 7874(c)(4) in the same manner as any other distribution that is not treated as an NOCD.

Comments requested clarification regarding whether the NOCD rule could apply for purposes other than the ownership fraction. For example, the comments questioned whether property distributed as part of an NOCD could be considered held by the EAG for purposes of determining whether the EAG has substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country. The temporary regulations confirm that the NOCD rule applies only for purposes of determining the ownership percentage by value; it therefore does not apply for any other purpose, including, for example, the substantial business activities determination under § 1.7874-3 or the loss of control exception under § 1.7874-1(c)(3). Nevertheless, the scope of section 7874(c)(4), by its terms, is not limited to the ownership fraction and therefore may apply for other purposes under section 7874. See also, for example, § 1.7874-3(c), which provides anti-abuse rules pursuant to which certain items are not taken into account for purposes of the substantial business activities test, including items associated with properties or liabilities the transfer of which is disregarded under section 7874(c)(4).

ii. Scope of the NOCD Rule

Comments recommended narrowing the NOCD rule. For example, comments suggested that the NOCD rule should only create, either in all cases or at least with respect to section 355 distributions, a rebuttable presumption that a distribution identified as an NOCD under the rule is made with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874. Under this approach, if a taxpayer demonstrated that a distribution presumptively identified as an NOCD was not in fact made with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874, then the distribution would not be disregarded. A comment did note, though, that difficulties, uncertainties, and administrative burdens could arise under a rebuttable presumption approach. After considering the comments received, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that replacing the per se NOCD rule with a rebuttable presumption would give rise to significant uncertainty and administrative burden because the IRS would face significant challenges in ascertaining the purpose underlying each distribution. Accordingly, the temporary regulations do not adopt this approach.

A comment suggested that, if a non-rebuttable presumption is retained, the NOCD rule should be narrowed by other means, such as by (i) replacing the 36-month period during which

distributions are subject to being disregarded under the NOCD rule with a 24-month period, (ii) increasing the 110% threshold, or (iii) excluding certain distributions (such as section 355 distributions, as well as certain other distributions) from the definition of distribution provided in the 2014 notice. This comment acknowledges that the adoption of many or all of these proposals, at the margins, could exempt certain tax-motivated distributions from the mechanical NOCD rules, but suggests that the IRS could nonetheless use its authority to disregard such distributions under the general anti-avoidance rule of section 7874(c)(4). After considering these comments, the Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that these changes could inappropriately facilitate the use of distributions made with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874. For example, excluding section 355 distributions from the definition of distribution would undermine one of the purposes of the NOCD rule, which is to address certain section 355 distributions in which a domestic distributing corporation distributes one or more lines of business in order to facilitate a future inversion by either the controlled corporation or itself based on a business combination with a foreign corporation that may or may not have been definitively identified. Similarly, with respect to the 36-month period, a comment suggests that it is unlikely that a taxpayer would be able to determine 36 months before a particular transaction the amount of distributions that would be required to reduce the ownership percentage below 60% or 80% on the completion date. Large transactions, however, can take many months to close. Moreover, some companies that wish to pursue an inversion but have not yet definitively identified a foreign target may use NOCDs to reduce their size in order to expand the pool of appropriately-sized target companies. Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the parameters described in the 2014 notice and the 2015 notice strike the right balance between exempting non-abusive transactions from the NOCD rule and providing an administrable rule to address tax-motivated transactions. In particular, for the reasons described previously for not converting the NOCD rule into a rebuttable presumption, the Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that the general anti-avoidance rule under section 7874(c)(4) would not be an effective backstop to looser objective tests. Accordingly, the temporary regulations do not adopt these recommendations.

Other comments suggested that the regulations should exclude the following distributions from the NOCD rule because they ordinarily would not give rise to avoidance concerns: (i) Dividends or redemptions made pursuant to a policy that is carried out consistently for the 36-month period preceding the completion date; (ii) intercompany distributions by a controlled corporation to its corporate shareholder, before the latter distributes the former in a spin-off transaction; (iii) certain redemptions of preferred stock; and (iv) in the case of a domestic entity that is a domestic partnership, certain partnership distributions. These changes are not adopted in the temporary regulations because each type of distribution implicates the fundamental concern that it reduces the value of the domestic entity. Furthermore, the Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that crafting an “angel list” of categories of distributions would make the NOCD rule more complex and in some cases could lead to inappropriate results. As an example of additional complexity, to produce symmetrical results, it would be necessary to distinguish these types of distributions from other distributions and exclude them not only from the look-back period, but also from the distribution history period (as described in Section iii of this Part I.B.5.b). Another comment suggested that aggregate distributions during a period be calculated by netting distributions against certain capital contributions. Although netting distributions against contributions could more accurately reflect any reduction in the value of the domestic entity, it would require additional rules to identify which contributions and distributions are appropriate to net, raising the same complexity concerns as the other comments. The Treasury Department and IRS also note that netting is not allowed in other settings, for example, in the excess distribution regime under section 1291 (which applies to passive foreign investment companies) and in § 1.7874-4T (which applies to domestic entity acquisitions). In particular, § 1.7874-4T does not allow for a foreign acquiring corporation to net the amount of disqualified stock, the issuance of which increases its value, against distributions it makes. In sum, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the NOCD rule should operate as a bright-line rule, testing whether a domestic entity's value-decreasing distributions exceed a threshold amount. For this reason, and in response to a comment, the temporary regulations exclude from the definition of a distribution certain distributions described in sections 304 and 305 because they do not reduce the domestic entity's value. See § 1.7874-10T(h)(1)(i)(A) and (B).

iii. Determining NOCDs

The temporary regulations set forth five steps for determining the amount of NOCDs. The first step is to identify the look-back period, that is, the period during which distributions are subject to being disregarded under the NOCD rule. Under § 1.7874-10T(h)(4), the look-back period means the 36-month period ending on the completion date or, if shorter, the entire period starting with the formation date (described in § 1.7874-10T(h)(3) as the earliest of the dates that the domestic entity and any predecessor were created or organized) and ending on the completion date.

The next step is to divide the look-back period into look-back years. Although the 2014 notice contemplated using a taxable-year convention to determine a look-back year, a taxable-year convention may create undue complexity or uncertainty when—as noted in a comment—the completion date is not the last day of the domestic entity's taxable year, or when the domestic entity (or any predecessor) has a short taxable year. Because a 12-month convention more simply addresses these situations and thus provides for a more administrable NOCD rule, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that a 12-month convention should be used to determine a look-back year. Accordingly, the temporary regulations provide that a look-back year generally means any of the three consecutive 12-month periods that comprise the look-back period. See § 1.7874-10T(h)(5)(i). The temporary regulations also provide special rules for determining look-back years when the look-back period is less than 36 months. See § 1.7874-10T(h)(5)(ii) through (iv).

Once the look-back years have been determined, the distribution history period for each look-back year must be identified. The distribution history period for a look-back year generally means the 36-month period preceding the start of the look-back year. § 1.7874-10T(h)(2)(i). In response to a comment, the temporary regulations provide special rules for determining the distribution history period for a look-back year that is not preceded by 36 months of history. In particular, § 1.7874-10T(h)(2)(ii) provides that when the formation date is less than 36 months, but at least 12 months, before

the start of a look-back year, then the distribution history period for that look-back year means the entire period, starting with the formation date, that precedes the start of the look-back year. Section 1.7874-10T(h)(2)(iii) provides that, when a look-back year is preceded by less than 12 months of history, then the look-back year is considered to not have a distribution history period.

Next, the NOCD threshold for each look-back year must be calculated. Except for a look-back year that does not have a distribution history period, the NOCD threshold for a look-back year means 110 percent of the sum of the distributions made during the distribution history period for that look-back year multiplied by a fraction. § 1.7874-10T(h)(7)(i). The numerator of the fraction is the number of days in the look-back year at issue, and the denominator of the fraction is the number of days in the distribution history period for that look-back year. Id. Thus, if a look-back year has a 36-month distribution history period, the NOCD threshold for that look-back year would be 110 percent of the distributions in the 36-month distribution history period, multiplied by 1/3 (simplified from 365/1095). Similarly, if a look-back year has only a 12-month distribution history period, then the NOCD threshold for that look-back year generally would be 110 percent of the distributions in the 12-month distribution history period, multiplied by 1 (simplified from 365/365). For a look-back year that does not have a distribution history period, the NOCD threshold is zero. § 1.7874-10T(h)(7)(ii).

The last step for determining the amount of NOCDs is to calculate, for each look-back year, the excess, if any, of all distributions made during the look-back year over the NOCD threshold for the look-back year. Under § 1.7874-10T(h)(6), the excess amounts constitute NOCDs.

One comment suggested an aggregate approach to determining NOCDs under which NOCDs would mean the excess of all distributions during the look-back period over 110 percent of the aggregate distributions made during the 36-month period preceding the look-back period. The approach described in the preceding paragraphs is generally consistent with the approach used in other areas of the Code. See, for example, sections 172(g)(3)(C) and 1291(b)(1). Moreover, for a domestic entity that has otherwise had a consistent distribution practice during the look-back period, the approach suggested by the comment would facilitate larger distributions than are intended to be permitted under the NOCD rule in the year preceding the domestic entity acquisition, the year in which abusive distributions are most likely. As a result, the Treasury Department and the IRS decline to adopt the recommendation.

iv. Predecessors

In response to a comment, the temporary regulations provide that a corporation or partnership (relevant entity) is treated for all purposes of the NOCD rule—including for purposes of look-back year calculations, distribution history period calculations, and NOCD threshold calculations—as having made distributions that were made by a predecessor of the relevant entity (the predecessor rule). § 1.7874-10T(e). Under the predecessor rule, a domestic entity “inherits” distributions made by a predecessor (and, such a predecessor could also be a relevant entity that inherits distributions made by a predecessor with respect to it).

(a) Purposes of the Predecessor Rule

The predecessor rule serves two purposes. First, the predecessor rule prevents potential avoidance of the NOCD rule. For example, absent the predecessor rule, a domestic corporation that would be treated as having NOCDs under the NOCD rule might, in anticipation of a domestic entity acquisition, undergo a reorganization into a newly formed domestic corporation and take the position that the newly formed domestic corporation has no distributions to which the NOCD rule applies. In addition, upon the combination of two domestic corporations in a transaction before a domestic entity acquisition, the domestic corporations might, absent the predecessor rule, structure the combination such that the corporation with the more favorable distribution history serves as the surviving corporation. Although section 7874(c)(4) could apply to address these types of transactions even absent the predecessor rule, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that it is appropriate to specifically address these transactions through the predecessor rule.

Second, the predecessor rule increases the accuracy of NOCD calculations. That is, when two entities combine in a transaction that increases the value of the combined group (for example, in a transaction in which a substantial portion of the consideration issued by the acquiring entity consists of equity interests in the entity), the distribution-paying capacity of the combined group increases. As a result, the separate distribution histories of the entities should be combined pursuant to the predecessor rule because, otherwise, post-combination distributions (which are funded by the earnings of both entities) might be compared to an NOCD threshold that is inappropriately low (that is, an NOCD threshold that takes into account the distribution history of only the acquiring entity).

(b) Definition of Predecessor

In response to comments, the temporary regulations provide guidance on the meaning of predecessor. In particular, the temporary regulations provide that an entity (tentative predecessor) is a predecessor of another entity (relevant entity) when two requirements are satisfied. First, the relevant entity must complete a predecessor acquisition, which occurs when a relevant entity directly or indirectly acquires substantially all of the properties held directly or indirectly by the tentative predecessor. See § 1.7874-10T(f)(1)(i) and (f)(2)(i). Second, after the predecessor acquisition and all related transactions are complete, at least 10 percent of the stock (or interests) in the relevant entity must be held by reason of holding stock (or interests) in the tentative predecessor. See § 1.7874-10T(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(3).

The second requirement generally ensures that only transactions that result in a meaningful increase in the value of the relevant entity result in the predecessor's history being inherited by the relevant entity. The second requirement also generally ensures that, before the predecessor acquisition, the fair market value of the tentative predecessor is greater than a de minimis portion of the fair market value of the relevant entity. Accordingly, and in response to a comment, the second requirement generally prevents a tentative predecessor from being a predecessor in cases in which the utility of the relevant entity inheriting the historic distributions of the tentative predecessor could be outweighed by the potentially complicated due diligence required to determine those historic distributions. On the other hand, the Treasury Department and the IRS determined that it is not appropriate to condition predecessor status on a tentative predecessor being larger in value than the relevant entity at the time of the predecessor acquisition, as was suggested by a comment. Such a narrow definition of predecessor would not appropriately reflect the second, accuracy-related purpose of the predecessor rule, which requires taking into account the increase in the

dividend-paying capacity of the combined entity.

(c) Distributions Inherited by the Domestic Entity

Under the temporary regulations, when there is a predecessor of a relevant entity, the relevant entity inherits the full amount of any distributions made by the predecessor before the predecessor acquisition. § 1.7874-10T(e)(1). The relevant entity also inherits the full amount of any transfer of money or other property to the former owners of the predecessor that is made in connection with the predecessor acquisition, to the extent the money or other property was directly or indirectly provided by the predecessor. See § 1.7874-10T(e)(2); see also § 1.7874-10T(h)(1)(iv).

v. Domestic Entity Deemed To Have Distributed Stock of a Distributing Corporation in Certain Cases

A comment noted that, in cases in which a foreign corporation wishes to acquire only a portion of a domestic corporation's properties, different results may arise under the NOCD rule depending on how the parties structure the acquisition and related transactions. Consider, for example, a situation in which a domestic parent corporation (DP) owns two businesses, Business A ($600 fair market value) and Business B ($400 fair market value), and a foreign corporation (FA) wishes to acquire Business A in exchange for FA stock. Under one structure, DP could contribute Business B to a newly formed domestic corporation (DC) and then distribute the stock of DC to its shareholders, followed by FA acquiring all the stock of DP in exchange for $600 of FA stock. Under another structure, DP could contribute Business A to DC and then distribute the stock of DC to its shareholders, followed by FA acquiring all the stock of DC in exchange for $600 of FA stock. In the first scenario, because the $400 of value attributable to Business B was distributed by the domestic entity (DP), the NOCD rule would take into account the value of Business B. In the second scenario, however, the NOCD rule would not take into account the $400 of value of Business B, because the value of Business B was not distributed by the domestic entity (DC) and, moreover, DC would not inherit any portion of the distribution by DP of the DC stock. See § 1.7874-10T(f)(1) (defining a predecessor).

The comment explained that examples like the one in the preceding paragraph demonstrate that, if in certain cases the direction of a spin-off is respected for purposes of the NOCD rule, then transactions that are substantively the same could give rise to vastly different results under the NOCD rule depending on the direction of the spin-off. The comment noted that this could lead to abuse of the NOCD rule. The Treasury Department and the IRS agree with the concerns raised by the comment. As a result, the temporary regulations provide a special rule pursuant to section 7874(g) that, for purposes of the NOCD rule, creates parity between certain transactions regardless of the direction of a spin-off. See § 1.7874-10T(g).

The special rule in § 1.7874-10T(g) applies when a domestic corporation (domestic distributing corporation) distributes stock of another domestic corporation (controlled corporation) pursuant to a transaction described in section 355 and, immediately before the distribution, the value of the distributed stock represents more than 50 percent of the value of the domestic distributing corporation. When the special rule applies, the controlled corporation is deemed for purposes of the NOCD rule to have distributed the stock of the distributing corporation. The value of the deemed distribution is equal to the fair market value of the distributing corporation (but not taking into account the fair market value of the stock of the controlled corporation) on the date of the distribution.

vi. NOCD Rule for Purposes of Section 367(a) Substantiality Test

The temporary regulations generally provide that, for purposes of the substantiality test in § 1.367(a)-3(c)(3)(iii)(A), the fair market value of the U.S. target company includes the aggregate value of NOCDs made by the U.S. target company. § 1.367(a)-3T(c)(3)(iii)(C). In this regard, NOCDs are calculated in the same manner as provided under § 1.7874-10T. See id. Thus, regardless of whether the transfer of stock of the U.S. target company is part of a domestic entity acquisition, the amount of NOCDs under § 1.367(a)-3T(c)(3)(iii)(C) is the same as the amount of NOCDs that would exist under § 1.7874-10T.

One comment recommended a de minimis exception should apply to the NOCD rule as applied for purposes of the section 367(a) substantiality test. The comment suggested that the exception could be based on a fixed dollar amount or percentage of the U.S. target company, perhaps conditioned on a requirement that the distribution not have been motivated by the substantiality test. The temporary regulations adopt the comment's recommendation to provide a de minimis exception, but do not adopt the comment's recommended formulation of the exception. Rather, because the Treasury Department and IRS have concluded that the NOCD rule should apply consistently under sections 367 and 7874, the temporary regulations provide that the NOCD rule under section 367 does not apply if the de minimis exception in § 1.7874-10T(d) would apply. See § 1.367(a)-3T(c)(3)(iii)(C).

C. Subsequent Transfers of Stock of the Foreign Acquiring Corporation and the EAG Rules

1. In General

In general, section 7874 is intended to apply to transactions in which a U.S. parent corporation of a multinational corporate group is replaced by a foreign parent corporation without a significant change in the ultimate ownership of the group. See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 755, 108th Cong., 2d Sess., at 568 (2004). Congress intended the statutory EAG rule in section 7874(c)(2)(A) to prevent section 7874 from applying to certain transactions that do not give rise to inversion policy concerns. For example, section 7874 should not apply to transactions occurring within a group of corporations owned by the same common parent corporation before and after the transaction, such as the conversion of a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary into a new wholly-owned CFC. See JCT Explanation, at 344. In this regard, section 7874(c)(2)(A) provides that stock of a foreign acquiring corporation that is held by members of the EAG is not included in the numerator or the denominator of the ownership fraction (statutory EAG rule).

The application of the statutory EAG rule may not always lead to appropriate results, including when the domestic entity has minority shareholders. To address these cases, § 1.7874-1 provides two exceptions to the statutory EAG rule: The internal group restructuring exception and the loss-of-control exception (together with the statutory EAG rule, the EAG rules). See § 1.7874-1(c)(2) and (3), respectively. When either of these exceptions applies, stock of the foreign acquiring corporation held by members of the EAG is excluded from the numerator, but not the denominator, of the ownership fraction. In general, the internal group restructuring exception applies when the domestic entity and the foreign acquiring corporation are members of an affiliated group (generally based on an 80-percent vote-and-value requirement) with the same common parent both

before and after the acquisition. The loss-of-control exception applies when the former domestic entity shareholders or former domestic entity partners do not hold more than 50 percent of the stock of any member of the EAG after the acquisition. For additional background on these exceptions, see the preamble to TD 9238, published on December 28, 2005, in the

Federal Register

(70 FR 76685).

Section 1.7874-5T addresses the effect on the numerator of the ownership fraction when former domestic entity shareholders or former domestic entity partners receive stock of the foreign acquiring corporation by reason of holding stock or a partnership interest in the domestic entity and then transfer that stock to another person. Specifically, § 1.7874-5T(a) provides that stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that is described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, by-reason-of stock) shall not cease to be so described as a result of any subsequent transfer of the stock by the former domestic entity shareholder or former domestic entity partner that received the stock, even if the subsequent transfer is related to the domestic entity acquisition described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(i). The preamble to that regulation notes that the Treasury Department and the IRS continue to study the extent to which subsequent transfers of stock of the foreign acquiring corporation should be taken into account in applying the EAG rules. See TD 9654, published on January 17, 2014, in the

Federal Register

(79 FR 3094, at 3099).

2. Rule Addressing Application of EAG Rules When There Is a Related Transfer of Stock of the Foreign Acquiring Corporation

Section 2.03(b) of the 2014 notice provides a rule concerning the interaction of § 1.7874-5T and the EAG rules. Subject to two exceptions, the 2014 notice provides that certain stock, referred to as “transferred stock,” is not treated as held by a member of the EAG for purposes of applying the EAG rules. As a result, transferred stock generally is included in both the numerator and the denominator of the ownership fraction. See § 1.7874-5T(a). For this purpose, transferred stock is stock of a foreign acquiring corporation described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, by-reason-of stock) that is received by a former domestic entity shareholder or former domestic entity partner that is a corporation (transferring corporation), and, in a transaction (or series of transactions) related to the domestic entity acquisition, is subsequently transferred.

The 2014 notice also described two exceptions to this rule: The U.S.-parented group exception and the foreign-parented group exception. When either of these exceptions applies, transferred stock is treated as held by members of the EAG for purposes of applying the EAG rules. In these cases, transferred stock is excluded from the numerator of the ownership fraction and, depending on the application of § 1.7874-1(c), may be excluded from the denominator of the ownership fraction. See § 1.7874-1(b) and (c).

The U.S.-parented group exception applies if: (i) Before and after the domestic entity acquisition, the transferring corporation (or its successor) is a member of a U.S.-parented group, and (ii) after the domestic entity acquisition, both the person that holds the transferred stock after all related transfers of the transferred stock are complete and the foreign acquiring corporation are members of the U.S.-parented group referred to in (i).

The foreign-parented group exception applies if: (i) Before the domestic entity acquisition, the transferring corporation and the domestic entity are members of the same foreign-parented group, and (ii) after the domestic entity acquisition, the transferring corporation is a member of the EAG, or would be a member of the EAG absent the subsequent transfer of any stock of the foreign acquiring corporation by a member of the foreign-parented group in a transaction related to the domestic entity acquisition (but taking into account all other transactions related to such acquisition).

The 2014 notice defines a U.S.-parented group as an affiliated group that has a domestic corporation as the common parent corporation, and a foreign-parented group as an affiliated group that has a foreign corporation as the common parent corporation. For this purpose, the term “affiliated group” means an affiliated group as defined in section 1504(a) but without regard to section 1504(b)(3), except that section 1504(a) is applied by substituting the term “more than 50 percent” for the term “at least 80 percent” each place it appears. Finally, the 2014 notice provides that, except as provided in the foreign-parented group exception, all transactions related to the domestic entity acquisition must be taken into account for purposes of determining an EAG, a U.S.-parented group, and a foreign-parented group.

3. Regulations Implementing the Rule

Section 1.7874-6T sets forth the rule concerning the interaction of § 1.7874-5T and the EAG rules, as described in the 2014 notice, subject to the modifications described in this Part I.C.3, in part, to address comments received.

a. Loosening of the Restrictions for the U.S.-Parented Group Exception

In response to a comment, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that it is not necessary to limit the U.S.-parented group exception to cases in which the common parent after the domestic entity acquisition is the same as the common parent before the acquisition. Accordingly, under § 1.7874-6T, the U.S.-parented group exception applies if two requirements are satisfied. First, before the domestic entity acquisition, the transferring corporation must be a member of a U.S.-parented group. § 1.7874-6T(c)(1)(i). Second, after the domestic entity acquisition, each of the transferring corporation (or its successor), any person that holds transferred stock, and the foreign acquiring corporation must be members of a U.S.-parented group the common parent of which: (i) Before the domestic entity acquisition, was a member (including the parent) of the U.S.-parented group described in the first requirement; or (ii) is a corporation that was formed in a transaction related to the domestic entity acquisition, provided that, immediately after the corporation was formed (and without regard to any related transactions), the corporation was a member of the U.S.-parented group described in the first requirement. § 1.7874-6T(c)(1)(ii).

A comment asserted that certain restructurings undertaken by foreign-parented groups could inappropriately be subject to section 7874. The comment posited a circumstance that is a variation of Example 2 of section 2.03(b)(iv) of the 2014 notice, where FA, the foreign acquiring corporation, acquired all the stock of a domestic corporation (DT) from a foreign corporation (FT) pursuant to a reorganization described in section 368(a)(1)(F). Related to the reorganization, FA subsequently issued shares to an individual in exchange for nonqualified property (as defined in § 1.7874-4T(i)(7)), which prevented FA and FT from being members of the same expanded affiliated group, therefore resulting in an ownership fraction of 100 percent. The comment asserted that there was no policy reason for section 7874 to apply to this transaction and requested that all “foreign-to-foreign” reorganizations described in section 368(a)(1)(F) be excluded from the application of section 7874.

The Treasury Department and the IRS decline to adopt the comment at this

time. Section 1.7874-6T addresses the interaction of § 1.7874-5T and the EAG rules and, in particular, when transferred stock is treated as held by members of the EAG. In the example set forth in the comment, the stock that caused FA and FT to cease being members of the same EAG is not transferred stock. Thus, the comment is beyond the scope of the temporary regulations. Nevertheless, the Treasury Department and the IRS will continue to study the scope of section 7874 and its application to various transactions, including cases similar to the example set forth in the comment.

b. Identifying Transferred Stock

A comment noted that it is unclear how to identify transferred stock in certain cases. This may occur, for example, when a transferring corporation that receives stock of a foreign acquiring corporation described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, by-reason-of stock) also holds other stock of the foreign acquiring corporation that has the same terms as the by-reason-of stock (other stock) (by-reason-of stock and other stock, collectively, fungible stock), and in a transaction related to the domestic entity acquisition, subsequently transfers less than all of the fungible stock. Different results would arise in these cases depending on the extent to which the subsequently transferred stock is considered to consist of by-reason-of stock or other stock.

To address this concern, the temporary regulations provide that a pro rata portion of the subsequently transferred stock is treated as consisting of by-reason-of stock. See § 1.7874-6T(f)(2)(ii).

c. Modifications to the Affiliate-Owned Stock Rules in § 1.7874-1

The temporary regulations modify the affiliate-owned stock rules in § 1.7874-1 to take into account the rules described in the 2014 notice. First, the temporary regulations provide that, subject to an exception, for purposes of §§ 1.7874-1 and 1.7874-1T, all transactions related to an acquisition are taken into account. See § 1.7874-1T(f). This rule is consistent with the general rule provided in § 1.7874-6T(e) and the general rule described in section 2.03(b)(i) of the 2014 notice.

Second, the temporary regulations modify the internal group restructuring exception to take into account § 1.7874-6T(c)(2). See § 1.7874-1T(c)(2)(iii).

D. The Substantial Business Activities Test

1. The Subject-to-Tax Rule

Section 2.02(a) of the 2015 notice provides a rule (the subject-to-tax rule) that addresses domestic entity acquisitions in which a taxpayer asserts that its EAG has substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country when compared to the EAG's total business activities even though the foreign acquiring corporation is not subject to tax as a resident of the relevant foreign country. Under the subject-to-tax rule, an EAG cannot have substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country when compared to the EAG's total business activities unless the foreign acquiring corporation is subject to tax as a resident of the relevant foreign country.

The temporary regulations implement the subject-to-tax rule described in the 2015 notice without making any substantive changes. See § 1.7874-3T(b)(4). The requirement set forth in § 1.7874-3T(b)(4) is in addition to the three quantitative tests for group employees, group assets, and group income set forth in § 1.7874-3(b)(1) through (3).

2. Clarification of “Group Income”

Under § 1.7874-3, an EAG is considered to have substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country only if at least 25 percent of its group employees, group assets, and group income are located or derived in the relevant foreign country. In general, group income is gross income from transactions occurring in the ordinary course of business with unrelated customers, as determined consistently under either federal tax principles or as reflected in the EAG's financial statements. With respect to group income determined using the EAG's financial statements, a comment in response to final regulations issued under § 1.7874-3 (see TD 9720, published on June 4, 2015, in the

Federal Register

(80 FR 31837)), questioned whether financial reporting principles apply only to determine the amount of items of income that is taken into account (such as where there is a book-tax difference) or also to determine which EAG members are to be taken into account during the testing period. The question arose because the regulations refer to the “International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) used for consolidated financial statement purposes.” § 1.7874-3(d)(10). The reference in § 1.7874-3(d)(10) to the IFRS used for consolidated financial statement purposes is intended to ensure only that the EAG uses a single set of IFRS in preparing financial statements for this purpose, as there may be certain variations in the IFRS used in different countries. The temporary regulations clarify that financial reporting principles are only relevant for determining the amount of items of income that are taken into account, as an EAG must take into account all items that its members (as determined based on the definition of EAG set forth in § 1.7874-3(d)(4)) recognized for financial accounting purposes during the testing period.

II. Rules Addressing Certain Post-Inversion Tax Avoidance Transactions

As stated in Section 1 of the 2014 notice, the Treasury Department and the IRS understand that certain inversion transactions are motivated in substantial part by the ability to engage in tax avoidance transactions after the inversion transaction that would not be possible in the absence of the inversion transaction. In order to reduce the tax benefits of certain post-inversion tax avoidance transactions, the 2014 notice announced that the Treasury Department and the IRS would issue regulations under sections 304(b)(5)(B), 367, 956(e), 7701(l), and 7874 of the Code. Furthermore, the 2015 notice announced additional rules to reduce the tax benefits of certain post-inversion tax avoidance transactions.

A. United States Property Rule

1. Overview

As described in section 3.01(a) of the 2014 notice, an inversion transaction may permit the new foreign parent of the inverted group, a group still principally comprised of United States shareholders and their CFCs, to avoid section 956 by accessing the untaxed earnings and profits of the CFCs without a current U.S. federal income tax to the United States shareholders. This is a result that the United States shareholders could not achieve before the inversion transaction. The ability of the new foreign parent to access deferred CFC earnings and profits would in many cases eliminate the need for the CFCs to pay dividends to the United States shareholders, thereby circumventing the purposes of section 956.

In order to prevent this avoidance of section 956, section 3.01(b) of the 2014 notice announces that future regulations will include a rule (the United States property rule) providing that, solely for purposes of section 956, any obligation or stock of a non-CFC foreign related person (generally, either the foreign

acquiring corporation or a foreign affiliate of the foreign acquiring corporation that is not an expatriated foreign subsidiary) is United States property within the meaning of section 956(c)(1) to the extent such obligation or stock is acquired by an expatriated foreign subsidiary during the applicable period. The 2014 notice defines an expatriated foreign subsidiary as a CFC with respect to which an expatriated entity is a United States shareholder, but provides that an expatriated foreign subsidiary does not include a CFC that is a member of the EAG on the completion date if the domestic entity is not a United States shareholder with respect to the CFC on or before the completion date. For example, a CFC owned by a U.S. corporation or U.S. partnership historically owned by the foreign parent generally would not be an expatriated foreign subsidiary because the domestic entity was not a United States shareholder with respect to such CFC on or before the completion date. See section 958(b)(4).

2. Regulations Implementing the United States Property Rule

These temporary regulations include the rules described in the 2014 notice, with certain modifications, in part, to address comments received.

a. General Section 956 Rule

Section 1.956-2T(a)(4)(i) provides that, generally, for purposes of section 956 and § 1.956-2(a), United States property includes an obligation of a foreign person and stock of a foreign corporation if (A) the obligation or stock is held by a CFC that is an expatriated foreign subsidiary, (B) the foreign person or foreign corporation is a non-CFC foreign related person, and (C) the obligation or stock was acquired either during the applicable period or in a transaction related to the inversion transaction. A non-CFC foreign related person is defined as a foreign related person that is not itself an expatriated foreign subsidiary. See § 1.7874-12T(a)(16). The rule applies to obligations and stock acquired during the applicable period or in a transaction related to the inversion transaction, regardless of whether at the time of acquisition the obligation or stock would constitute United States property—that is, regardless of whether, at the time of acquisition, the expatriated foreign subsidiary was a CFC or an expatriated foreign subsidiary, and the non-CFC foreign related person was a non-CFC foreign related person. Rather, the rules apply when the requirements set forth in § 1.956-2T(a)(4)(i) are satisfied on the expatriated foreign subsidiary's relevant quarterly measuring date.

The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that CFC acquisitions of stock or obligations of a prospective foreign acquiring corporation or its foreign affiliates in contemplation of an inversion transaction present the same repatriation concerns as such acquisitions undertaken after an inversion transaction. Accordingly, § 1.956-2T(a)(4)(i)(C)(

2

) clarifies that stock or obligations that otherwise meet the requirements of the United States property rule described in the 2014 notice but that were issued prior to the applicable period, in a transaction related to the inversion transaction, constitute United States property, provided they are acquired on or after April 4, 2016.

An expatriated foreign subsidiary generally is defined as a CFC with respect to which an expatriated entity is a United States shareholder. See § 1.7874-12T(a)(9)(i). However, consistent with the 2014 notice, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the CFCs of a domestic subsidiary owned by a foreign acquiring corporation before an inversion transaction should not be subject to the section 956 rules described in this Part II.A, or the rules under sections 7701(l) and 367(b) described in Sections B.1, B.2, and B.3 of this Part II. Accordingly, consistent with the 2014 notice, § 1.7874-12T(a)(9)(ii) excludes from the definition of expatriated foreign subsidiary a CFC that was a member of the EAG on the completion date if the domestic entity was not a United States shareholder with respect to the CFC on or before the completion date. As a result of not being treated as expatriated foreign subsidiaries, these CFCs are not subject to the new rules described in this Part II.A. However, the stock and obligations of these CFCs generally are United States property when acquired by an expatriated foreign subsidiary during the applicable period because these CFCs constitute non-CFC foreign related persons within the meaning of these temporary regulations. In addition, the exclusion from the definition of expatriated foreign subsidiary does not apply to CFCs of the foreign acquiring corporation's legacy domestic group that are formed or acquired after the inversion transaction. See § 1.956-2T(a)(4)(iv),

Example 4.

The 2014 notice indicates that the term “expatriated entity” has the meaning provided in section 7874(a)(2)(A). Section 7874(a)(2)(A) defines an expatriated entity to include both the domestic entity and any United States person who is related (within the meaning of section 267(b) or 707(b)(1)) to the domestic entity. Comments questioned which entities are expatriated entities in certain cases, for example, when a domestic entity described in section 7874(a)(2)(B)(i) is transferred or ceases to exist. In response to these comments, these temporary regulations clarify that an expatriated entity means a domestic entity (which includes a successor to a domestic entity, whether domestic or foreign) and any United States person that, on any date on or after the completion date, is or was related (within the meaning of section 267(b) or 707(b)(1)) to the domestic entity. See § 1.7874-12T(a)(6) and (8). Thus, for example, an entity that is a domestic subsidiary of a foreign acquiring corporation on (and before) the completion date, is treated as an expatriated entity, while any CFCs owned by that domestic subsidiary on or before the completion date are not treated as expatriated foreign subsidiaries.

The 2014 notice also provides that an expatriated foreign subsidiary that is a pledgor or guarantor with respect to an obligation of a non-CFC foreign related person will be treated as holding the obligation, which would be United States property under the general rule of § 1.956-2T(a)(4)(i), to the same extent that it would be treated as holding the obligation if it were a pledgor or guarantor with respect to an obligation of a United States person under the principles of section 956(d) and § 1.956-2(c). Accordingly, these temporary regulations add § 1.956-2T(c)(5) to extend the pledge and guarantee rule in § 1.956-2(c) to apply to obligations of non-CFC foreign related persons. Under this rule, an expatriated foreign subsidiary that is (or is treated as) a pledgor or guarantor of an obligation of a non-CFC foreign related person is considered to hold the obligation for purposes of section 956. In addition to pledges or guarantees entered into or treated as entered into during the applicable period, the rule applies to pledges or guarantees entered into or treated as entered into in a transaction related to an inversion transaction provided they are entered into or treated as entered into on or after April 4, 2016.

b. Exceptions From United States Property

In the description of the United States property rule in section 3.01(b) of the 2014 notice, the Treasury Department and the IRS requested comments on whether any exceptions under section 956(c)(2) or § 1.956-2 should apply to an obligation or stock of a non-CFC

foreign related person that is United States property pursuant to the general rule in § 1.956-2T(a)(4)(i). A comment suggested that the following exceptions from United States property should apply to obligations of non-CFC foreign related persons: (i) The exception for obligations arising out of the sale or processing of property described in section 956(c)(2)(C); (ii) the exception for assets equal to the earnings of the CFC that have been taxed as effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business included in section 956(c)(2)(H); (iii) the exception for certain deposits made in the ordinary course of a person's business as a dealer in securities or commodities described in section 956(c)(2)(I); and (iv) the exception in section 956(c)(2)(J) for obligations, to the extent the principal amount thereof does not exceed the fair market value of readily marketable securities sold or repurchased pursuant to a sale and repurchase agreement or otherwise posted or received as collateral for the obligation in the ordinary course of its business by a person that is a securities or commodities dealer.

The Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that it is appropriate for these exceptions to apply to obligations of non-CFC foreign related persons as well as United States persons because they relate to ordinary business transactions. The exceptions in section 956(c)(2)(H) and (I) apply by their terms to obligations of non-CFC foreign related persons, and thus no rules need to be added to the regulations to extend their application. On the other hand, the exceptions in current section 956(c)(2)(C) and (J) apply only to obligations of United States persons. Accordingly, these temporary regulations add rules in § 1.956-2T(a)(4)(ii)(A) and (B), pursuant to which obligations of non-CFC foreign related persons are excluded from the definition of United States property to the same extent that obligations of United States persons are excluded from the definition of United States property under section 956(c)(2)(C) and (J). In addition, new § 1.956-2T(d)(2)(iii) excludes from the definition of United States property obligations of non-CFC foreign related persons that arise in connection with the provision of services by a CFC, based on the principles of the exception in § 1.956-2T(d)(2)(ii) (previously § 1.956-2T(d)(2)(i)(B)), which sets forth a similar exclusion for obligations of United States persons.

A comment also advocated for an additional exception for CFCs that are regularly engaged in a third-party lending business. Specifically, the comment suggested that loans made by a CFC to related parties in the ordinary course of the CFC's business should not be treated as United States property when the CFC is regularly engaged in the business of making loans to unrelated parties. Alternatively, the comment suggested a more limited exclusion for loans made pursuant to a binding commitment that predated the inversion transaction, or negotiations leading to it, such as loans made under a revolving line of credit that was established several years before the first negotiations leading to the inversion transaction. An exception akin to the exception suggested by the comment does not currently exist with respect to obligations of United States persons. The consideration of new exceptions to the definition of United States property is beyond the scope of this regulation. Furthermore, the exception from the definition of non-CFC foreign related person for other expatriated foreign subsidiaries ensures that CFCs of a newly inverted group that are in the business of lending to other CFCs of the group will not be subject to section 956 with respect to the loans.

The 2014 notice provides that the exception to the definition of obligation for certain short-term obligations announced in Notice 88-108 (the short-term obligation exception) would not apply to obligations of non-CFC foreign related persons. As discussed in more detail in Part III.B of this Explanation of Provisions section, Notice 88-108 announced an exception for obligations that are collected within 30 days, as long as the CFC does not have loans to related United States persons that would constitute United States property outstanding during the year for 60 or more days. A comment requested that the Treasury Department and the IRS reconsider this position because the concerns underlying the exception exist with respect to foreign-parented groups as well as U.S.-parented groups, and questioned the rationale for eliminating this exception in the context of an inversion transaction. The Treasury Department and the IRS are concerned that there is a heightened risk that taxpayers would take abusive positions in reliance on the short-term obligation exception announced in Notice 88-108 in post-inversion transaction structures, due to the fact that gaining access to the deferred foreign earnings of CFCs without paying U.S. federal income tax is often a stated goal of inversion transactions. Accordingly, these temporary regulations provide that the exception announced in Notice 88-108 applies only to obligations of United States persons. Therefore, this exception does not apply to an obligation of a non-CFC foreign related person that is treated as United States property pursuant to § 1.956-2T(a)(4)(i).

B. Rules Addressing Avoidance of U.S. Federal Income Tax on Certain Earnings and Profits of a CFC or Certain Appreciation in a CFC's Assets

1. Section 7701(l) Recharacterization Rule

a. Overview

As described in the 2014 notice, after an inversion transaction, the inverted group may cause an expatriated foreign subsidiary to cease to be a CFC using certain transactions that do not give rise to U.S. federal income tax, so as to avoid U.S. federal income tax on the CFC's pre-inversion transaction earnings and profits. Additionally, even if the foreign acquiring corporation were to acquire less stock of an expatriated foreign subsidiary, such that the expatriated foreign subsidiary remained a CFC, it could nevertheless substantially dilute a United States shareholder's ownership of the CFC. As a result, the United States shareholder could avoid U.S. federal income tax on the CFC's pre-inversion transaction earnings and profits if, for example, the CFC later redeemed, on a non pro rata basis, its stock held by the foreign acquiring corporation.

In order to prevent the use of these transactions to avoid U.S. federal income tax, the 2014 notice announces that the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to issue regulations under section 7701(l) that will recharacterize specified transactions completed during the applicable period (the section 7701(l) recharacterization rule). A specified transaction is defined in section 3.02(e)(i) of the 2014 notice as a transaction in which stock in an expatriated foreign subsidiary (specified stock) is transferred (including by issuance) to a specified related person. A specified related person means a non-CFC foreign related person, a U.S. partnership that has one or more partners that is a non-CFC foreign related person, or a U.S. trust that has one or more beneficiaries that is a non-CFC foreign related person.

Section 3.02(e)(i)(A) of the 2014 notice provides that a specified transaction is recharacterized for all purposes of the Code, as of the date on which the specified transaction occurs, as an arrangement directly between the specified related person and one or more section 958(a) U.S. shareholders of the expatriated foreign subsidiary. A

section 958(a) U.S. shareholder of an expatriated foreign subsidiary is defined in the 2014 notice as a United States shareholder with respect to the expatriated foreign subsidiary that owns (within the meaning of section 958(a)) stock in the expatriated foreign subsidiary, but only if the United States shareholder is related (within the meaning of section 267(b) or 707(b)(1)) to the specified related person or is under the same common control (within the meaning of section 482) as the specified related person.

The 2014 notice states that regulations will provide that, if an expatriated foreign subsidiary issues specified stock to a specified related person, the specified transaction will be recharacterized as follows: (i) The property transferred by the specified related person to acquire the specified stock (transferred property) will be treated as having been transferred by the specified related person to the section 958(a) U.S. shareholder(s) of the expatriated foreign subsidiary in exchange for instruments deemed issued by the section 958(a) U.S. shareholder(s) (deemed instrument(s)); and (ii) the transferred property or proportionate share thereof will be treated as having been contributed by the section 958(a) U.S. shareholder(s) (through intervening entities, if any, in exchange for equity in such entities) to the expatriated foreign subsidiary in exchange for stock in the expatriated foreign subsidiary. The 2014 notice states that similar principles will apply to recharacterize a specified transaction in which a shareholder transfers specified stock of the expatriated foreign subsidiary to a specified related person (such as a partnership in which a non-CFC foreign related person is a partner).

Section 3.02(e)(i)(B) of the 2014 notice explains that regulations will provide that a deemed instrument treated as issued in a specified transaction will have the same terms as the specified stock (other than the issuer). Accordingly, if a distribution is made with respect to specified stock of the expatriated foreign subsidiary, matching seriatim distributions with respect to stock will be treated as made by the expatriated foreign subsidiary (through intervening entities, if any) to the section 958(a) U.S. shareholder(s). The section 958(a) U.S. shareholder(s), in turn, will be treated as making payments with respect to the deemed instrument(s) to the specified related person(s). An expatriated foreign subsidiary will be treated as the paying agent of a section 958(a) U.S. shareholder of the expatriated foreign subsidiary with respect to the deemed instrument treated as issued by the section 958(a) U.S. shareholder to a specified related person.

The 2014 notice states that the regulations will not recharacterize a specified transaction in certain situations. If the specified transaction is a fast-pay arrangement that is recharacterized under § 1.7701(l)-3(c)(2), section 3.02(e)(i)(A) of the 2014 notice provides that the rules of § 1.7701(l)-3 will apply instead of the recharacterization provided in the 2014 notice. Furthermore, section 3.02(e)(i)(C) of the 2014 notice provides that a specified transaction will not be recharacterized if the specified stock was transferred by a shareholder of the expatriated foreign subsidiary and, under applicable U.S. federal income tax rules, the shareholder either is required to recognize and include in income all of the gain in the specified stock (including gain treated as a deemed dividend pursuant to section 964(e) or 1248(a) or characterized as a dividend pursuant to section 356(a)(2)) or has a deemed dividend included in income with respect to the specified stock under § 1.367(b)-4 (including by reason of the regulations described in the 2014 notice that apply to specified exchanges, described in Section 2.c.i of this Part II.B). The last exception described in the 2014 notice applies if (i) the expatriated foreign subsidiary is a CFC immediately after the specified transaction and all related transactions, and (ii) the amount of stock (by value) in the expatriated foreign subsidiary (and any lower-tier expatriated foreign subsidiary) that is owned, in the aggregate, directly or indirectly by the section 958(a) U.S. shareholders of the expatriated foreign subsidiary immediately before the specified transaction and any transactions related to the specified transaction does not decrease by more than 10 percent as a result of the specified transaction and any related transactions. The 2015 notice clarifies that the second prong of the exception is satisfied only if the percentage of stock (by value) (rather than the amount of stock (by value)) does not decrease by more than 10 percent.

Further, the 2014 notice states that regulations will provide that if a deemed dividend is included in a CFC's income under section 964(e) as a result of a specified transaction that is completed during the applicable period, the deemed dividend will not be excluded from foreign personal holding company income under section 954(c)(6) (to the extent in effect, and notwithstanding the rule described in Notice 2007-9, 2007-1 C.B. 401).

b. Regulations Implementing the Section 7701(l) Recharacterization Rule

These temporary regulations implement the section 7701(l) recharacterization rule described in the 2014 notice, subject to certain modifications, in part, to address comments received. Under § 1.7701(l)-4T(b)(1), a specified transaction completed during the applicable period will be recharacterized in the manner described in § 1.7701(l)-4T(c), subject to the exceptions described in § 1.7701(l)-4T(b)(2).

i. General Recharacterization Rule

The description of the specified transaction rules in section 3.02(e) of the 2014 notice provides that a “section 958(a) U.S. shareholder” means any United States shareholder of an expatriated foreign subsidiary that is related (within the meaning of section 267(b) or 707(b)(1)) to the specified related person or is under the same common control (within the meaning of section 482) as the specified related person. In order to more appropriately tailor the rules, these temporary regulations narrow the definition of the term “section 958(a) U.S. shareholder” to include only United States shareholders that are expatriated entities. See § 1.7701(l)-4T(f)(10).

If an expatriated foreign subsidiary issues specified stock to a specified related person, the specified transaction is recharacterized under § 1.7701(l)-4T(c)(2) in the manner described in the 2014 notice. Similar rules are provided in § 1.7701(l)-4T(c)(3) for a specified transaction arising from a transfer of specified stock by shareholders of the expatriated foreign subsidiary. In the 2014 notice, the Treasury Department and the IRS requested comments about the application of the recharacterization rules to transfers to partnerships that are specified related persons, as illustrated in Example 2 in section 3.02(e)(iii) of the notice. A comment suggested that the recharacterization described in the 2014 notice should not apply to transfers of specified stock to partnerships, and that, instead, a transferee partnership should be treated as a conduit, to the extent of its ownership of specified stock and any corresponding property contributed to the partnership. The comment suggested that the section 958(a) U.S. shareholder could be treated as directly owning the specified stock, or, alternatively, the items attributable to the specified stock could be tracked solely to the section 958(a) U.S. shareholder. Thus, under the proposed recast, each transferor to the partnership would be treated as

retaining its economic interest in the property transferred to the partnership.

The Treasury Department and the IRS appreciate the complexity of the recharacterization described in the 2014 notice, as highlighted by the comment, but are concerned that the comment does not fully account for the treatment of distributions by the expatriated foreign subsidiary as received by its section 958(a) U.S. shareholder rather than the transferee partnership. After consideration of the comment's proposal, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the recharacterization described in the 2014 notice better ensures that an expatriated foreign subsidiary that is transferred to a partnership that is a specified related person continues to be a CFC, while addressing the ancillary consequences of recharacterizing the transfer.

The expatriated foreign subsidiary stock that is deemed issued pursuant to the recharacterization is referred to in the regulations as “deemed issued stock,” and the specified stock actually issued pursuant to the specified transaction but disregarded pursuant to the recharacterization is referred to as “disregarded specified stock.” Because the instruments deemed issued by a section 958(a) U.S. shareholder have the same terms as the disregarded specified stock (other than the issuer), the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that the deemed instruments generally will be treated as equity for all purposes of the Code.

ii. Exceptions From Recharacterization

Section 1.7701(l)-4T(b)(2) sets forth three exceptions to the application of the rules in § 1.7701(l)-4T(c) to recharacterize a specified transaction. The first two exceptions are consistent with the exceptions described in the 2014 notice and the 2015 notice for fast-pay arrangements described in § 1.7701(l)-3(b) and transactions (including specified exchanges) in which an appropriate amount of gain is recognized. See Section 2.C of this Part II.B for a description of the rules applicable to specified exchanges.

The final exception applies when the expatriated foreign subsidiary is a CFC immediately after the specified transaction and any related transaction and there is only a

de minimis

shift of ownership of the stock of the expatriated foreign subsidiary or any lower-tier expatriated foreign subsidiary to non-CFC foreign related persons. See § 1.7701(l)-4T(b)(2)(iii). This exception (referred to in this Part II.B.1.b.ii as the “

de minimis

exception”) replaces the exception described in the 2014 notice for specified transactions in which the ownership of section 958(a) U.S. shareholders did not decrease by more than 10 percent as a result of the specified transaction and any related transactions. The new

de minimis

exception better reflects the policy behind the section 7701(l) recharacterization rule by ensuring that dilution of the ownership interests of section 958(a) U.S. shareholders in an expatriated foreign subsidiary that is attributable to unrelated persons is not taken into account in determining whether the exception from recharacterization applies. See § 1.7701(l)-4T(g),

Example 3.

The

de minimis

exception generally determines whether a specified transaction shifts ownership of stock of an expatriated foreign subsidiary (or any lower-tier expatriated foreign subsidiary) to non-CFC foreign related persons by comparing the percentage of the stock (by value) of the expatriated foreign subsidiary (or any lower-tier expatriated foreign subsidiary) owned immediately before and immediately after the transaction by persons other than non-CFC foreign related persons. For this purpose, to determine direct or indirect ownership, the principles of section 958(a) apply without regard to whether an intermediate entity is foreign or domestic. § 1.7701(l)-4T(f)(4). The

de minimis

exception applies if the post-transaction ownership percentage (defined in § 1.7701(l)-4T(f)(9)) is at least 90 percent of the pre-transaction ownership percentage (defined in § 1.7701(l)-4T(f)(8)).

The temporary regulations provide a special rule to ensure that stock of a corporation that is directly or indirectly owned by a domestic corporation that is an expatriated entity is considered for purposes of the

de minimis

exception as not owned by a non-CFC foreign related person. See § 1.7701(l)-4T(f)(4). Absent this special rule, such stock would not, to the extent such stock is indirectly owned by a non-CFC foreign related person through the domestic corporation, be treated as owned by a person other than a non-CFC foreign related person for purposes of the

de minimis

exception.

Because the

de minimis

exception measures the shift in ownership of lower-tier expatriated foreign subsidiaries as well as the expatriated foreign subsidiary whose stock is transferred or issued in the specified transaction, dilution of a United States person's indirect interest in a lower-tier expatriated foreign subsidiary can prevent the exception from applying, even if the United States person is not a section 958(a) U.S. shareholder with respect to that lower-tier expatriated foreign subsidiary. See § 1.7701(l)-4T(g),

Example 6.

The 2014 notice requested comments on whether an exception to the section 7701(l) recharacterization rule and the section 367(b) stock dilution rule (described in Section 2 of this Part II.B) is warranted where (i) a specified transaction is undertaken in order to integrate similar or complementary businesses and (ii) after the inversion transaction, the inverted group in fact does not exploit that form in order to avoid U.S. taxation on the expatriated foreign subsidiary's pre-inversion earnings and profits. In addition, the 2014 notice requested comments on the provisions that would be necessary to administer such an exception and on the types of transactions that would need to serve as “triggers” for denying the exception because taxpayers could use them to avoid tax on a CFC's pre-inversion earnings after a specified transaction. One comment recommended providing a business integration exception because foreign-parented multinational groups of corporations often engage in internal restructurings for business reasons. After consideration of the comment, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that a business integration exception would be very difficult to administer given the subjective nature of the determination, the difficulty of determining whether the taxpayer takes “exploitative” actions in subsequent taxable years, and the complexity of potentially having to apply the section 7701(l) recharacterization rule retroactively depending on these subsequent actions. Accordingly, the temporary regulations do not provide a business integration exception.

iii. Transactions Affecting Ownership of Stock of an Expatriated Foreign Subsidiary Following a Recharacterized Specified Transaction

The rules in § 1.7701(l)-4T(d) address transactions that affect the ownership of stock of an expatriated foreign subsidiary after a specified transaction with respect to the expatriated foreign subsidiary has been recharacterized under § 1.7701(l)-4T(c)(2) or (3). As discussed in Section i of this Part II.B.1.b, a specified transaction that is recharacterized under the rules of § 1.7701(l)-4T(c) is recharacterized for all purposes of the Code as of the date that the specified transaction occurs. Although the recharacterization described in the 2014 notice generally applies for all purposes for all future tax years, the Treasury Department and the IRS considered whether to unwind the recharacterization when stock,

including disregarded specified stock, in the expatriated foreign subsidiary is transferred (directly or indirectly) after the specified transaction, and considered adding other special rules concerning the results of a subsequent transfer of expatriated foreign subsidiary stock.

The specified transaction rules in § 1.7701(l)-4T are issued under the Secretary's regulatory authority in section 7701(l) to recharacterize multi-party financing arrangements to prevent the avoidance of tax, which is the same authority underlying the fast-pay arrangement rules in § 1.7701(l)-3. Although the two regulations serve a similar purpose, the technical rules that effectuate that purpose deviate due to differences in the underlying financing arrangements. The specified transaction rules set forth herein generally are concerned with the relationship of the expatriated foreign subsidiary to the expatriated entity, as well as the expatriated foreign subsidiary's status as a controlled foreign corporation, and thus generally are focused on abusive transactions that affect the direct and indirect ownership of the expatriated foreign subsidiary.

The 2014 notice states that rules similar to those described in § 1.7701(l)-3(c)(3)(iii) (concerning transfers of benefited stock) under the fast-pay regulations will apply to transactions affecting specified stock. In general, pursuant to § 1.7701(l)-3(c)(3)(iii)(A), the designation of stock as benefited stock continues upon transfer of the stock. Upon further consideration, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that it is not necessary for the specified transaction rules to maintain the connection between the instruments that are deemed issued pursuant to the recharacterization and the stock (specifically, the non-specified stock) that led to the application of the recharacterization rules, as occurs when § 1.7701(l)-3(c)(3)(iii) is applied to fast-pay stock, due to the differences in policy underlying the fast-pay regulations and these temporary regulations. Accordingly, a transfer of non-specified stock does not require an associated transfer of the deemed instruments as would be required under the rules in § 1.7701(l)-3(c)(3)(iii) for a transfer of benefited stock. See § 1.7701(l)-4T(d)(1).

However, the Treasury Department and the IRS determined that special rules are necessary to address direct and indirect transfers of stock of an expatriated foreign subsidiary (both disregarded specified stock and non-specified stock), including rules that generally terminate the recharacterization provided for in these temporary regulations. Transactions that occur after the specified transaction can affect the underlying ownership of the expatriated foreign subsidiary stock in such a way that the underlying need for the recharacterization rules ceases to exist. That is, there is no reason for the recharacterization rules to continue to apply when the reason for the rule ceases to apply; the rules need to apply only to the extent the relatedness that gave rise to the application of the rules continues to be present. In addition, transactions in which the inverted group no longer holds the expatriated foreign subsidiary create concerns about whether the taxpayer will have access to the information necessary to comply with the rules in these temporary regulations. In this circumstance, the administrative burden of maintaining the recharacterization is not justified.

Thus, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that it is appropriate, in certain circumstances, to unwind the recharacterization as a result of certain subsequent transactions that affect the ownership of the expatriated foreign subsidiary. The regulations provide that the recharacterization generally is fully unwound when an expatriated foreign subsidiary ceases to be a foreign related person. Specifically, § 1.7701(l)-4T(d)(2) provides that when a transaction causes an expatriated foreign subsidiary to cease to be a foreign related person, the recharacterization is fully unwound immediately before the transaction as follows: the section 958(a) U.S. shareholders are treated as redeeming their respective deemed instruments with the deemed issued stock in the expatriated foreign subsidiary, which, in turn, is “recapitalized” into the disregarded specified stock (which is the specified stock that was transferred in the specified transaction that gave rise to the application of § 1.7701-4T) in the hands of the specified related person.

In addition, the regulations provide for a similar pro-rata unwind when the expatriated foreign subsidiary continues to be a foreign related person after a direct or indirect transfer of disregarded specified stock of the expatriated foreign subsidiary, and, after the transfer, no portion of the disregarded specified stock is held by a foreign related person, a specified related person, or an expatriated entity. In such circumstances, § 1.7701(l)-4T(d)(3) provides that the recharacterization under § 1.7701(l)-4T(c)(2) or (3) is partially unwound as follows: The section 958(a) U.S. shareholders are treated as redeeming a proportionate amount of their respective deemed instruments with the deemed issued stock in the expatriated foreign subsidiary, which, in turn, is “recapitalized” into the disregarded specified stock (which is the specified stock that was transferred in the specified transaction that gave rise to the application of § 1.7701-4T) in the hands of the specified related person.

The regulations also provide a rule that applies when there is a direct transfer of disregarded specified stock, but the recharacterization is not unwound, because the transaction does not result in an unwind under the rules described earlier in this Part II.B.1.b.iii. In those circumstances, the transferor is treated as transferring the deemed instruments, in lieu of the disregarded specified stock, in exchange for the consideration that was received in exchange for the disregarded specified stock. See § 1.7701(l)-4T(d)(4).

Even if the rules described in this Part II.B.1.b.iii do not apply to unwind a recharacterization under the rules of § 1.7701(l)-4T(c)(2) or (3), an inverted group may choose to unwind the recharacterization by causing the expatriated foreign subsidiary to actually redeem all of its disregarded specified stock.

iv. Treatment of Deemed Dividends Included in Income Under Section 964(e)

Under § 1.7701(l)-4T(e), and consistent with section 3.02(e)(i) of the 2014 notice, a deemed dividend that is included in a CFC's income under section 964(e) as a result of a specified transaction that is completed during the applicable period is not excluded from FPHCI under section 954(c)(6) (to the extent in effect and notwithstanding the rule described in Notice 2007-9). See Part III.C of this Explanation of Provisions section for a discussion of Notice 2007-9.

2. Section 367(b) Stock Dilution Rule

a. Overview

Section 3.02(e)(ii) of the 2014 notice provides a rule (the section 367(b) stock dilution rule) that addresses certain post-inversion transaction exchanges that dilute the interest of a United States shareholder in a CFC and, absent the rule, could allow the United States shareholder to avoid U.S. federal income tax on earnings and profits of the CFC that exist at the time of the exchange. Specifically, the section 367(b) stock dilution rule, as described in the 2014 notice, provides that when certain requirements are satisfied with

respect to an exchange (see Section c.i of this Part II.B.2), the exchanging shareholder is generally required to include in income as a deemed dividend the section 1248 amount with respect to the stock exchanged.

As explained in the 2014 notice, the section 367(b) stock dilution rule is subject to an exception. The exception applies to exchanges that satisfy the principles of the second exception described in section 3.02(e)(i)(C) of the 2014 notice (regarding specified transactions that do not decrease, in the aggregate, the section 958(a) U.S. shareholders' ownership of stock in an expatriated foreign subsidiary (or lower-tier expatriated foreign subsidiary) by more than 10 percent).

The 2014 notice also provides that § 1.367(b)-4(c)(1) (regarding the exclusion of a deemed dividend from foreign personal holding company income) does not apply to a deemed dividend that results from an exchange to which the section 367(b) stock dilution rule applies. Further, the 2014 notice provides that such a deemed dividend does not qualify for the exceptions from foreign personal holding company income provided by section 954(c)(3)(A)(i) or (6) (to the extent in effect).

b. Application of the Section 367(b) Stock Dilution Rule to Unrealized Appreciation

The 2015 notice expands the consequences of being subject to the section 367(b) stock dilution rule. The 2015 notice provides that, when an exchanging shareholder is required under the section 367(b) stock dilution rule to include in income as a deemed dividend the section 1248 amount (if any) with respect to the stock exchanged, the exchanging shareholder must also, after taking into account any increase in basis provided in § 1.367(b)-2(e)(3)(ii) resulting from the deemed dividend, recognize all realized gain with respect to the stock that is not otherwise recognized. The 2015 notice explains that this result is necessary to prevent a United States shareholder of a CFC from potentially avoiding U.S. federal income tax on net unrealized built-in-gain in property held by the CFC at the time of the exchange of the stock of the CFC. See section 3.02(b) of the 2015 notice.

The 2015 notice also states that a conforming change will be made to the regulations described in section 3.02(e)(i) of the 2014 notice. Thus, as noted in Section 1.b.ii of this Part II.B, the first exception described in section 3.02(e)(i)(C) of the 2014 notice applies with respect to a transfer of specified stock only if, as a result of the transfer, all the gain in the specified stock is recognized.

c. Regulations Implementing the Section 367(b) Stock Dilution Rule

The temporary regulations implement the section 367(b) stock dilution rule as described in the 2014 notice and the 2015 notice, subject to certain modifications. See § 1.367(b)-4T(e).

i. Requirements for the Section 367(b) Stock Dilution Rule to Apply

The section 367(b) stock dilution rule, as described in the 2014 notice, generally applies to an exchange when three requirements are satisfied. First, the exchanging shareholder must be described in § 1.367(b)-4(b)(1)(i)(A). Second, the exchange must occur pursuant to a transaction described in § 1.367(b)-4(a) in which the exchanging shareholder exchanges stock of an expatriated foreign subsidiary for stock in another foreign corporation. An

This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.