Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1991 Volkswagen Transporter Multi-Purpose Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation
Federal RegisterApr 17, 2013
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2013-0031, Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1991 Volkswagen Transporter Multi-Purpose Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation
AGENCY:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of receipt of petition.
SUMMARY:
This document announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that nonconforming 1991 Volkswagen Transporter Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), are eligible for importation into the United States because they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards (1991 Volkswagen Vanagon Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles) and they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.
DATES:
The closing date for comments on the petition is May 17, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above and be submitted by any of the following methods:
•
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Go to
http://www.regulations.gov
. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
•
Mail:
Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001
•
Hand Delivery or Courier:
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
•
Fax:
202-493-2251
Instructions:
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to
http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act:
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
How To Read Comments submitted to the Docket:
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov
. Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search the Docket for new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the
Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the
Federal Register
.
Autostadt West of West Sacramento, California (Registered Importer 06-346) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming European Market 1991 Volkswagen Transporter Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles which Autostadt West believes are substantially similar are 1991 Volkswagen Vanagon Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles that were manufactured for import into, and sale in the United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified 1991 Volkswagen Transporter Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with most FMVSS.
Autostadt West submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 1991 Volkswagen Transporter Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles, as originally manufactured, conform to many FMVSS in the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards. Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 1991 Volkswagen Transporter Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles are identical to their U.S. certified counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102
Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect,
103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems,
104
Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems,
105
Hydraulic and Electric Brake Systems,
106
Brake Hoses,
107
Reflecting Surfaces,
116
Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids,
119
New Pneumatic Tires for Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars,
124
Accelerator Control Systems,
201
Occupant Protection in Interior Impact,
202
Head Restraints,
204
Steering Control Rearward Displacement,
205
Glazing Materials,
206
Door Locks and Door Retention Components,
207
Seating Systems,
210
Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages,
211
Wheel Nuts, Wheels Disks, and Hub Caps,
212
Windshield Mounting,
214
Side Impact Protection,
216
Roof Crush Resistance,
301
Fuel System Integrity,
and 302
Flammability of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 101
Controls and Displays:
replacement of the brake failure lamp lens, installation of a seat belt warning lamp, and recalibration of the speedometer/odometer to show speed in miles per hour and distance in miles.
Standard No. 108
Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment:
replacement of the headlamps, side marker reflectors, turn signals, and stop lamps with U.S.-model components.
Standard No. 111
Rearview Mirrors:
replacement of the passenger side rearview mirror with a U.S.-model component or inscription of the required warning statement on the face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114
Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention:
installation of a U.S.-model micro switch in the steering lock assembly and a warning buzzer.
Standard No. 120
Tire Selection for Vehicles Other Than Passenger Vehicles:
installation of an information placard containing manufacturer specifications for seating capacity and loading, and tire specifications.
Standard No. 208
Occupant Crash Protection:
(a) Installation of a U.S.-model push button seat belt buckle with a warning contact switch; (b) installation of a seat belt warning light in the instrument cluster and associated wiring.
Standard No. 209
Seat Belt Assemblies:
installation of a U.S.-model push button seat belt buckle with a warning contact switch.
The petitioner states that the VIN plate must also be installed on the left front corner of the dashboard to meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 565.
All comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition will be published in the
Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated below.
Authority:
49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.7; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Issued on: April 11, 2013.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2013-08957 Filed 4-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.