Sunset of the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan and a Limited Extension of the Green Technology Pilot Program
Federal RegisterDec 15, 2011
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. PTO-P-2011-0078]
Sunset of the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan and a Limited Extension of the Green Technology Pilot Program
AGENCY:
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY:
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) has provided two procedures under which an applicant may have an application accorded special status for examination. The Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan is available if the applicant expressly abandons another copending unexamined
application. The Green Technology Pilot Program is available to patent applications pertaining to environmental quality, energy conservation, development of renewable energy resources, and greenhouse gas emission reduction. In view of the trend in filings under the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan, this plan has fulfilled its purpose and will not be extended. In view of the success of the Green Technology Pilot Program, this plan will be extended until 500 additional applications have been accorded special status under this program or until March 30, 2012, whichever occurs earlier. Following the expiration of this extension, the program will be eliminated, and applicants may instead use the newly enacted Prioritized Examination (Track I) program. The Track I program not only provides advancement of examination, but sets a target of reaching final disposition within 12 months from the time advancement is initiated. Furthermore, the advancement in the Track I program is available to all technologies and is not restricted to certain categories of invention as in the Pilot Program.
DATES:
Effective Date:
December 15, 2011. The Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan became effective on November 27, 2009, was modified on June 24, 2010, and was extended on November 22, 2010. The Green Technology Pilot Program became effective on December 8, 2009, was modified to eliminate the classification requirement on May 21, 2010, and was extended on November 10, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pinchus M. Laufer or Michael Cygan, Office of Patent Legal Administration, Office of the Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, by telephone at (571) 272-7726 or (571) 272-7700; or by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On November 27, 2009, the USPTO published a notice in the
Federal Register
providing an additional temporary basis (the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan) under which a small entity applicant may have an application accorded special status for examination if the applicant expressly abandons another copending unexamined application.
See Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan,
74 FR 62285 (Nov. 27, 2009), 1349
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
304 (Dec. 22, 2009) (notice). The USPTO indicated that the plan would last for the period ending on February 28, 2010, but may be extended for an additional time period thereafter.
See Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan,
74 FR at 62287, 1349
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
at 306. The USPTO extended the plan for an additional four months to June 30, 2010.
See Extension of the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan,
75 FR 5041 (Feb. 1, 2010), 1351
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
202 (Feb. 23, 2010). Subsequently, the USPTO expanded the plan to eliminate the small entity requirement and further extended its duration to expire at the earlier of the December 31, 2010 date, or the date that 10,000 applications have been accorded special status under this plan.
See Expansion and Extension of the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan,
75 FR 36063 (June 24, 2010), 1356
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
173 (July 20, 2010). The USPTO further extended the plan to expire at the earlier of December 31, 2011, or the date that 10,000 applications have been accorded special status under this plan.
See Extension of the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan,
75 FR 71072 (Nov. 22, 2010), 1361
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
230 (Dec. 28, 2010). Filings under this plan reached a peak in late 2010 and have since steadily decreased. Accordingly, as those desiring the benefits of this plan have taken advantage of its provisions, the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan has run its course and will not be further extended beyond December 31, 2011.
On December 8, 2009, the USPTO published a notice for the implementation of the Green Technology Pilot Program.
See Pilot Program for Green Technologies Including Greenhouse Gas Reduction,
74 FR 64666 (December 8, 2009), 1349
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
362 (December 29, 2009) (
Green Technology
Notice). The
Green Technology
Notice indicated that an applicant may have an application advanced out of turn (accorded special status) for examination, if the application pertained to green technologies and met other requirements specified in the
Green Technology
Notice. The USPTO published a notice eliminating the classification requirement of the Green Technology Pilot Program on May 21, 2010.
See Elimination of the Classification Requirement in the Green Technology Pilot Program,
75 FR 28554 (May 10, 2010), 1355
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
188 (June 15, 2010). The USPTO further extended the program to expire at the earlier of December 31, 2011, or the date that 3,000 applications have been accorded special status under this program.
See Expansion and Extension of the Green Technology Pilot Program,
75 FR 69049 (Nov. 10, 2010), 1361
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 50
(Dec. 7, 2010). In view of the success of the Green Technology Pilot Program in the designated technology areas, the Green Technology Pilot Program will be extended until an additional 500 applications have been accorded special status under this program (for a total of 3,500 applications) or March 30, 2012, whichever occurs earlier. Following the expiration of this extension, the program will be eliminated, and applicants may instead seek to use the newly enacted Prioritized Examination (Track I) program.
The Prioritized Examination (Track I) program permits an applicant to have an application advanced out of turn (accorded special status) for examination under 37 CFR 1.102(e), if the application contains, upon filing, a request for prioritized (Track I) examination accompanied by the appropriate fees.
See Changes to Implement the Prioritized Examination Track (Track I) of the Enhanced Examination Timing Control Procedures Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act,
76 FR 59050 (September 23, 2011), 1371
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office
151 (October 18, 2011) (Track I Notice).
The Track I Program provides prioritized examination having a more aggressive time frame for examination than the Green Technology Pilot Program, with an aggregate goal of reaching final disposition within 12 months and maintains an enhanced special status of the application throughout prosecution until final disposition. Additionally, the Track I Program does not have the restrictions of the Green Technology Pilot Program on the types of inventions for which special status may be sought, as the Track I Program does not require a connection to any particular technology.
In view of the ability of any applicant to request prioritized examination with the filing of an application under the procedure set forth in the Track I Notice, the Green Technology Pilot Program will not be extended past the earlier of March 30, 2012, or the date that 3,500 applications have been accorded special status under this program.
Dated: December 7, 2011.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2011-32115 Filed 12-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.