Wage Methodology for the Temporary Non-Agricultural Employment H-2B Program; Postponement of Effective Date

Federal RegisterSep 28, 2011

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

20 CFR Part 655

RIN 1205-AB61

Wage Methodology for the Temporary Non-Agricultural Employment H-2B Program; Postponement of Effective Date

AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION:

Final rule; delay of effective date.

SUMMARY:

The Department of Labor (Department) is postponing the effective date of the Wage Methodology for the Temporary Non-Agricultural Employment H-2B Program; Final Rule, 76 FR 3452, Jan. 19, 2011, (the Wage Rule). The Wage Rule revised the methodology by which we calculate the prevailing wages to be paid to H-2B workers and United States (U.S.) workers recruited in connection with a temporary labor certification for use in petitioning the Department of Homeland Security to employ a nonimmigrant worker in H-2B status. The effective date of the Wage Rule was set at January 1, 2012. However, the Wage Methodology for the Temporary Non-Agricultural Employment H-2B Program; Amendment of Effective Date; Final Rule, 76 FR 45667, August 1, 2011 revised the effective date to September 30, 2011. Due to pending legal challenges, we are postponing the effective date of the Wage Rule to November 30, 2011, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 705.

DATES:

The effective date of the rule amending 20 CFR part 655 published at 76 FR 45667, August 1, 2011 is delayed until November 30, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William L. Carlson, PhD, Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor Certification, ETA, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room C-4312, Washington, DC 20210; Telephone (202) 693-3010 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with hearing or speech impairments may access the telephone number above via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1-877-889-5627 (TTY/TDD).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Department published the Wage Rule on January 19, 2011, 76 FR 3452. The Wage Rule revised the methodology by which we calculate the prevailing wages to be paid to H-2B workers and United States (U.S.) workers recruited in connection with a temporary labor certification for use in petitioning the Department of Homeland Security to employ a nonimmigrant worker in the H-2B status.

The Department originally set the effective date of the Wage Rule for January 1, 2012. On January 24, 2011, the plaintiffs in

CATA

v.

Solis,

Civil No. 2:09-cv-240-LP (E.D. Pa.) filed a motion in which they argued that the January 1, 2012 effective date did not comply with the court's August 30, 2010 order to promulgate new rules concerning the calculation of the prevailing wage rate in the H-2B program.

CATA

v.

Solis,

Dkt. No. 103-1, Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Enforcing the Judgment at 2 (Jan. 24, 2011). On June 16, 2011, the court issued a ruling that invalidated the January 1, 2012 effective date of the Wage Rule and ordered us to announce a new effective date for the rule within 45 days from June 16.

CATA,

2011 WL 2414555 at *4.

In response to the court's order, we issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on June 28, 2011, which proposed that the Wage Rule take effect 60 days from the date of publication of a final rule resulting from the NPRM. 76 FR 37686, June 28, 2011. After a period of public comment, we published the Final Rule on August 1, 2011, which set the new effective date for the Wage Rule at September 30, 2011, without altering the substance of the Wage Rule. 76 FR 45667.

On September 7, 2011, the Louisiana Forestry Association, Inc., and others filed suit against the Department in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Alexandria Division.

Louisiana Forestry Association, Inc., et al (LFA)

v.

Solis, et al,

Civil Docket No. 11-1623. LFA claims that the Wage Rule, and the subsequent rule amending the Wage Rule's original effective date, violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Administrative Procedure Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended. Accordingly, LFA seeks temporary injunctive relief before September 30, 2011, and permanent injunctive relief, barring the Department from implementing the Wage Rule.

On September 19, 2011, the plaintiffs in the

CATA

litigation moved to intervene in the

LFA

litigation, and also moved to transfer venue over the litigation to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the court in which the

CATA

case remains pending. Both motions in the

LFA

litigation are currently pending.

On September 21, 2011, another group of employers filed a legal challenge to the Wage Rule in the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division.

Bayou Lawn & Landscape Services, et al. (Bayou)

v.

Solis, et al.,

Civil Docket No. 11-445. The

Bayou

plaintiffs' claims are similar to the

LFA

plaintiffs' claims, and they also seek to preliminarily and permanently enjoin the Department's implementation of the Wage Rule.

The Administrative Procedure Act, at 5 U.S.C. 705, provides that “[w]hen an agency finds that justice so requires, it may postpone the effective date of action taken by it, pending judicial review.” In consideration of the two pending challenges to the Wage Rule and its new effective date, and the possibility that, in response to the

CATA

plaintiffs' motion, the litigation will be transferred to another court, the Department is postponing the effective date of the rule from September 30, 2011, until November 30, 2011. This delay will allow the Department to mount an appropriate defense of the rule, and will allow for the orderly resolution of the various claims pending in two Federal courts. The delay will permit the various courts involved in the litigation to determine the appropriate venue for the resolution of all claims, and allow the Department to avoid the possibility of administering the H-2B program under potentially conflicting court orders. In the interest of administering a nationwide program in a uniform fashion during the pending litigation, the Department has determined that, in the interest of justice, a delay in the effective date is necessary.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of September, 2011.

Jane Oates,

Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training.

[FR Doc. 2011-24969 Filed 9-26-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4510-FP-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Wage Methodology for the Temporary Non-Agricultural Employment H-2B Program; Postponement of Effective Date · 76 FR 59896 | Frix