Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Federal RegisterOct 15, 2010
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (OMB No. 0930-0110)—Revision
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), formerly the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) is a survey of the civilian, non-institutionalized population of the United States 12 years old and older. The survey is used to determine the prevalence of use of tobacco products, alcohol, illicit substances, and illicit use of prescription drugs. The survey is also used to collect information on mental health problems and the utilization of substance abuse and mental health services. The results are used by SAMHSA, ONDCP, Federal government agencies, and other organizations and researchers to establish policy, direct program activities, and better allocate resources.
The 2011 NSDUH will continue conducting a follow-up clinical interview with a subsample of approximately 1,500 respondents. The design of this study is based on the recommendations from a panel of expert consultants convened by the Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), SAMHSA, to discuss mental health surveillance data collection strategies. The goal is to create a statistically sound measure that may be used to estimate the prevalence of Serious Mental Illness (SMI) among adults (age 18+).
For the 2011 NSDUH, no questionnaire changes are proposed.
As with all NSDUH/NHSDA surveys conducted since 1999, the sample size of the survey for 2011 will be sufficient to permit prevalence estimates for each of the fifty states and the District of Columbia.
Because the NSDUH collects data on substance use, mental health and the utilization of substance abuse and mental health services, it is an appropriate and convenient vehicle to measure the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on residents of that region. Therefore, SAMHSA is planning to expand the NSDUH by oversampling the geographic region impacted by the oil spill. The current NSDUH sample design will be implemented and an oversampling method that results in an additional 2,000 completed interviews in the gulf coast region will be employed. The additional interviews will be concentrated in the coastal counties of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi. All survey instruments and protocols will be identical for this additional sample. The total number of respondents for the 2011 NSDUH will be 69,500, or 2,000 cases more than the planned sample size for 2010.
Though there will be some increase in the sample for all four states involved in the Deepwater Horizon event (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi), specific counties in the gulf coast region were chosen for focused oversampling. These counties were chosen based on the following criteria:
• Claims activity to BP for economic and related health needs;
• County involvement with Department of Education and Administration for Children and Families programming; and
• State assessment of impacted counties based on consultation with SAMHSA during the preparation of aid applications.
Counties Designated as the Most Affected Areas
State name
County/parish name
Alabama
Baldwin
Alabama
Clarke
Alabama
Escambia
Alabama
Mobile
Alabama
Monroe
Alabama
Washington
Florida
Bay
Florida
Escambia
Florida
Franklin
Florida
Gulf
Florida
Okaloosa
Florida
Santa Rosa
Florida
Wakulla
Florida
Walton
Louisiana
Iberia
Louisiana
Jefferson
Louisiana
Lafayette
Louisiana
Lafourche
Louisiana
Orleans
Louisiana
Plaquemines
Louisiana
St. Bernard
Louisiana
St. Martin
Louisiana
St. Mary
Louisiana
St. Tammany
Louisiana
Terrebonne
Louisiana
Vermilion
Mississippi
George
Mississippi
Hancock
Mississippi
Harrison
Mississippi
Jackson
Mississippi
Pearl River
Mississippi
Stone
The total annual burden estimate is shown below:
Instrument
Number of
respondents
Responses per
respondent
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
Hourly wage
rate
Annualized
hourly costs
Household Screening
196,720
1
0.083
16,328
$14.64
$239,042
Interview
69,500
1
1.000
69,500
14.64
1,017,480
Clinical Follow-up Certification
90
1
1.000
90
14.64
1,318
Clinical Follow-up Interview
1,500
1
1.000
1,500
14.64
21,960
Screening Verification
5,560
1
0.067
373
14.64
5,461
Interview Verification
10,425
1
0.067
698
14.64
10,219
Total
196,810
88,489
1,295,480
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Room 8-1099, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857
AND
e-mail a copy to
summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.
Dated: October 8, 2010.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Management, Technology and Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-26077 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.