Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision that Nonconforming 2003 Audi RS6 and RS6 Avant Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2004-17672]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision that Nonconforming 2003 Audi RS6 and RS6 Avant Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION:

Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 2003 Audi RS6 and RS6 Avant passenger cars are eligible for importation.

SUMMARY:

This document announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 2003 Audi RS6 and RS6 Avant passenger cars that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are eligible for importation into the United States because (1) they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.

DATES:

The closing date for comments on the petition is June 7, 2004.

ADDRESSES:

Comments should refer to the docket number and notice number, and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 am to 5 pm]. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the

Federal Register

published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit

http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the

Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the

Federal Register

.

Webautoworld of Pompano Beach, Florida (Registered Importer 02-295) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 2003 Audi RS6 and RS6 Avant passenger cars are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles that WEBAUTOWORLD believes are substantially similar are 2003 Audi RS6 and S6 Avant passenger cars that were manufactured for importation into, and sale in, the United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified 2003 Audi RS6 and RS6 Avant passenger cars to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with most Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

WEBAUTOWORLD submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2003 Audi RS6 and RS6 Avant passenger cars, as originally manufactured, conform to many Federal motor vehicle safety standards in the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.

Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2003 Audi RS6 and RS6 Avant passenger cars are identical to their U.S. certified counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102

Transmission Shift Lever Sequence,

103

Defrosting and Defogging Systems,

104

Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems,

106

Brake Hoses,

109

New Pneumatic Tires,

113

Hood Latch Systems,

116

Brake Fluid,

118

Power-Operated Window Partition,

and

Roof Panel Systems,

124

Accelerator Control Systems,

135

Passenger Car Brake Systems,

201

Occupant Protection in Interior Impact,

202

Head Restraints,

204

Steering Control Rearward Displacement,

205

Glazing Materials,

206

Door Locks and Door Retention Components,

207

Seating Systems,

209

Seat Belt Assemblies,

210

Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages,

212

Windshield Mounting,

214

Side Impact Protection,

216

Roof Crush Resistance,

219

Windshield Zone Intrusion,

225

Child Restraint Anchorage Systems,

301

Fuel System Integrity,

and 302

Flammability of Interior Materials.

Petitioner indicates that the vehicles are not on the list of vehicles subject to the requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard found in 49 CFR Part 541.

In addition, the petitioner claims that the vehicles comply with the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR Part 581.

The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner indicated:

Standard No. 101

Controls and Displays:

(a) Inscription of the word “brake” on the instrument cluster in place of the international ECE warning symbol on vehicles that are not already so equipped; (b) modification of the speedometer to read in miles per hour by loading U.S. version information into the vehicle computer.

Standard No. 108

Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment:

Installation of the following components on vehicles that are not already so equipped: (a) U.S.-model headlamp assemblies that include front sidemarker lamps and front side reflex reflectors; (b) U.S.-model taillamp assemblies that include rear sidemarker lamps and rear side reflex reflectors; (c) U.S.-model high-mounted stop lamp assembly.

Standard No. 110

Tire Selection and Rims:

Installation of a tire information placard.

Standard No. 111

Rearview Mirror:

Replacement of the passenger side rearview mirror with a U.S.-model component, or inscription of the required warning statement on the mirror's face.

Standard No. 114

Theft Protection:

Modification by reprogramming the vehicle's computers to the U.S.-mode to ensure compliance with the standard.

Standard No. 208

Occupant Crash Protection:

(a) Modification by reprogramming the vehicle's computers to the U.S.-mode to activate the seatbelt warning buzzer and lamp; (b) installation of U.S.-model seatbelt buckle assemblies to ensure that the seatbelt warning system complies with the standard. The petitioner states that the vehicles are equipped with dual front air bags, and with combination lap and shoulder belts at the front and rear outboard seating positions that are self-tensioning and that release by means of a single red push button.

Standard No. 401

Interior Trunk Release:

Installation of U.S.-model components to ensure compliance with the standard.

The petitioner also states that a vehicle identification plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.

Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.]. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.

All comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition will be published in the

Federal Register

pursuant to the authority indicated below.

Authority:

49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: April 30, 2004.

Claude H. Harris,

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.

[FR Doc. 04-10358 Filed 5-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P