Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the American Stock Exchange LLC Relating to Crossing Procedures for Clean Agency Crosses

Federal RegisterFeb 20, 2003

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-47345; File No. SR-Amex-2002-89]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the American Stock Exchange LLC Relating to Crossing Procedures for Clean Agency Crosses

February 11, 2003.

On November 5, 2002, the American Stock Exchange LLC (“Amex” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)

1

and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,

2

a proposed rule change to amend Amex Rule 126(g), Commentary .02 to provide that orders of 5,000 shares or more for the account of a non-member organization may be crossed at a price at or within the bid or offer without being broken up by a specialist or Registered Trader acting as principal. The Amex filed an amendment to the proposed rule change on December 23, 2002.

3

The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for notice and comment in the

Federal Register

on January 7, 2003.

4

The Commission received no comments on the proposed rule change.

1

15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

2

17 CFR 240.19b-4.

3

See

letter from Michael Cavalier, Associate General Counsel, Amex, to Nancy Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, SEC, dated December 20, 2002, and enclosures (“Amendment No. 1”). Amendment No. 1 corrected a typographical error in the text of the proposed amendment.

4

Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47113 (December 31, 2002), 68 FR 818.

The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange

5

and, in particular, the requirements of section 6 of the Act

6

and the rules and regulations thereunder. The Commission finds specifically that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act

7

in that the Rule is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change, while eliminating the opportunity for specialists and Registered Traders to effect a proprietary transaction to provide price improvement to one side of a clean cross or the other, preserves auction market principles by providing the possibility of price improvement (because members must follow Amex Rule 151 crossing procedures), and by requiring that members trade with other market interest having time priority at that price before trading with any part of the cross transaction. In addition, the Commission believes that the proposal will enhance competition among markets in the execution of agency crosses.

5

In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

6

15 U.S.C. 78f.

7

15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

It is therefore ordered,

pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act

8

, that the proposed rule change, as amended (SR-AMEX-2002-89), be, and hereby is, approved.

8

15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). proposed rule change, as amended (SR-Amex-2002-89), be, and hereby is, approved.

For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.

9

9

17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 03-4045 Filed 2-19-03; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.