Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2000 Mazda MPV Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2003-16449]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2000 Mazda MPV Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION:

Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 2000 Mazda MPV multi-purpose passenger vehicles are eligible for importation.

SUMMARY:

This document announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 2000 Mazda MPV multi-purpose passenger vehicles that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are eligible for importation into the United States because (1) they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.

DATES:

The closing date for comments on the petition is December 10, 2003.

ADDRESSES:

Comments should refer to the docket number and notice number, and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the

Federal Register

published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit

http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the

Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the

Federal Register

.

Sunshine Car Import of Cape Coral, Florida (“SCI”) (Registered Importer 01-289) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 2000 Mazda MPV multi-purpose passenger vehicles are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles which SCI believes are substantially similar are 2000 Mazda MPV multi-purpose passenger vehicles that were manufactured for importation into, and sale in, the United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

The petitioner claims that it carefully compared non-U.S. certified 2000 Mazda MPV multi-purpose passenger vehicles to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with most Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

SCI submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2000 Mazda MPV multi-purpose passenger vehicles, as originally manufactured, conform to many Federal motor vehicle safety standards in the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.

Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2000 Mazda MPV multi-purpose passenger vehicles are identical to their U.S. certified counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102

Transmission Shift Lever Sequence,

103

Defrosting and Defogging Systems,

104

Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems,

105

Hydraulic Brake Systems,

106

Brake Hoses,

113

Hood Latch Systems,

116

Brake Fluid,

119

New Pneumatic Tires,

124

Accelerator Control Systems,

202

Head Restraints,

204

Steering Control Rearward Displacement,

205

Glazing Materials,

206

Door Locks and Door Retention Components,

207

Seating Systems,

209

Seat Belt Assemblies,

210

Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages,

212

Windshield Retention,

216

Roof Crush Resistance,

219

Windshield Zone Intrusion,

301

Fuel System Integrity,

and 302

Flammability of Interior Materials.

Petitioner states that the vehicles also comply with the Bumper Standard found at 49 CFR part 581.

Petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner indicated:

Standard No. 101

Controls and Displays:

(a) Inscription of the word “BRAKE” on the instrument cluster in place of the international ECE warning symbol; (b) replacement or modification of the speedometer to read in miles per hour.

Standard No. 108

Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment:

Installation of U.S.-model taillamp assemblies.

Standard No. 111

Rearview Mirror:

Replacement of the passenger side rearview mirror with a U.S.-model component, or inscription of the required warning statement on the face of that mirror.

Standard No. 114

Theft Protection:

Installation of a key warning buzzer, or reprogramming of the vehicle to activate the key warning system.

Standard No. 118

Power-Operated Window Systems:

Inspection of all vehicles and installation of a relay to make the window transport inoperative when the ignition is switched off in vehicles that are not already so equipped.

Standard No. 120

Tire Selection and Rims:

Installation of a tire information placard.

Standard No. 201

Occupant Protection in Interior Impact:

Inspection of all vehicles and installation of U.S.-model components necessary to achieve compliance with the standard in vehicles that are not already so equipped.

Standard No. 208

Occupant Crash Protection:

(a) Installation of a seat belt warning buzzer, wired to the seat belt micro switch; (b) Inspection of all vehicles and replacement of the driver's and passenger's air bags, knee bolsters, control unit, sensor, and all seat belts that are not U.S.-model components. The petitioner states that the vehicles should be equipped with dual front air bags and knee bolsters, with combination lap and shoulder belts at the front and rear outboard seating positions that are self-tensioning and released by means of a single red pushbutton, and with a lap belt in the rear center seating position.

Standard No. 214

Side Impact Protection:

Inspection of all vehicles and installation of U.S.-model door beams on vehicles that are not already so equipped.

Standard No. 225

Child Restraint Anchorage Systems:

Installation of a U.S.-model child seat tether anchor kit.

The petitioner states that all vehicles must be inspected to ensure that they are equipped with U.S.-model bumpers and that these components will be installed in vehicles not already so equipped to achieve compliance with the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR part 581.

The petitioner also states that a vehicle identification plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post and a reference and certification label must be affixed in the area of the left front door post to meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 565. The petition further states that a certification label must be affixed to the driver's door latch post to comply with the requirements of 49 CFR part 567.

Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St. SW., Washington, DC 20590. Docket hours are from 9 am to 5 pm. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.

All comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition will be published in the

Federal Register

pursuant to the authority indicated below.

Authority:

49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: November 4, 2003.

Kenneth N. Weinstein,

Associate Administrator for Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 03-28143 Filed 11-7-03; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P