IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT 01 2020
Court rules
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT 01 2020
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
CLERK, U.S DISTRICT C
+ U.S. OU
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN RE: EAST ST. Lous OFFICE
COURT OPERATIONS AND
)
)
THE USE OF VIDEO AND )
)
)
)
TELECONFERENCING DURING THE Administrative Order No. 266
EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
CREATED BY THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
FOURTH AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
This fourth amended omnibus Administrative Order amends and supersedes
Administrative Order No. 266 dated July 31, 2020,1 relative to cases and proceedings
before the District Court, the use of video and teleconferencing, and the operation of the
federal courthouses in East St. Louis and Benton, Illinois, during the continuing exigent
circumstances created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Bankruptcy Court proceedings also
are addressed below. This fourth amendment of Administrative Order No. 266 details a
flexible plan for operations during this fluctuating public health crisis. The Court
recognizes that it is impossible to cover all possible contingencies during this fluid
situation. This Order is therefore designed to give the presiding judicial officers flexibility
to address issues as they arise while implementing necessary safeguards.
I, Implementation of the COOP/COVID-19 Plan
The current COVID-19 outbreak has impacted the Southern District of Illinois, all
50 states, and countries around the world. Although for many this disease appears to
cause only flu-like symptoms, for others it can pose a serious risk, even death. There is
1 Administrative Order No. 266 (and subsequent amendments) supplant Second Amended Administrative
Order No. 261 dated April 1, 2020, Amended Administrative Order No. 262 dated April 1, 2020, and
Administrative Order No. 263 dated March 30, 2020.
Page 1 of 13
currently no vaccine to prevent COVID-19. On March 29, 2020, the Judicial Conference of
the United States declared that emergency conditions caused by the COVID-19 outbreak
are materially affecting, and will continue to materially affect, the functioning of the
federal courts generally. The rate of contamination in the 38 counties comprising this
district is fluctuating, and the Center for Disease Control (“CDC”) has stressed the need
to continue practicing measures such as teleworking, wearing masks, and social
distancing.
The CDC and local public health officials have advised that the best way to prevent
illness is to avoid opportunities for exposure. The virus is thought to spread mainly from
person-to-person, particularly between people who are in close proximity with one
another (within 6 feet) and through contact with contaminated surfaces. The Court finds,
for the reasons stated, that under The Federal Judiciary COVID-19 Recovery Guidelines,
Gating Criteria, and Recovery Resources issued by the Administrative Office of the
United States Courts, it can continue a phased plan for operations, but it must apply
recommended social distancing measures to protect the health of litigants, counsel,
witnesses, the public, and court personnel, and even reverse course as local conditions
dictate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the undersigned Chief Judge and chair of the
district’s Security Committee—after consultation with the judges of this district, the
United States Marshals Service, the Federal Protective Service, and the General Services
Administration building managers—activates and implements the district’s
COOP/COVID-19 Plan, effective through December 31, 2020. In accordance with the
Page 2 of 13
Plan, and pursuant to 41 C.F.R. § 102-74.375(b), access to the federal courthouses in East
St. Louis and Benton will be limited, and the operations of the District Court, Bankruptcy
Court, and the Probation and Pretrial Services Office will be altered accordingly.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with the COOP/COVID-19 Plan, and
after consultation with the Human Resources Division of the Administrative Office of the
United States Courts, all employees of the District Court are directed to telework
whenever possible, except when directed by their supervisor to report to the courthouse.
All District Court employees who, after consultation with their supervisor, are deemed
unable to telework or perform alternate duties, will be placed on administrative leave.
Il.
Courthouse Restrictions
Itis ORDERED that through December 31, 2020:
The federal courthouses in East St. Louis and Benton will be OPEN to the
public, subject to restrictions. In-person settings will be kept to a minimum,
and teleconferencing and videoconferencing will be utilized to ensure the work
of the Court continues.
Until further order of the Court the following restrictions and protocols shall
apply:
All persons seeking entry to, or occupying the courthouse, must wear a face
mask (no scarfs, neck gaiters, or masks with air vents) in the public areas of
the courthouses; this includes the lobby, elevator banks, restrooms, public
corridors, and, unless excused by the presiding judge, courtrooms. The
face mask must always completely conceal the wearer's nose and mouth.
Personnel working in a private office or workspace that permits at least six
feet of physical distance from other persons may temporarily remove their
mask, but should don a mask when anyone comes within six feet of them.
The only persons excepted from this requirement are those who provide
documentation that they are unable, for medical reasons, to wear a face
covering, in which case a shield and social distancing will suffice.
Page 3 of 13
e Any person falling into one of the following categories SHALL NOT ENTER
either courthouse:
¢ People with these symptoms or combinations of symptoms
within the last 14 days:
Fever or chills
Cough
Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
Fatigue
Muscle or body aches
Headache
New loss of taste or smell
Sore throat
Congestion or runny nose
Nausea or vomiting
Diarrhea
¢ Persons who have been diagnosed with or have had contact with
anyone who has been diagnosed with COVID-19 within the last 14 days.
Per the CDC, “close contact” is defined as being within six feet of
someone for longer than 15 minutes.
¢ Persons who have been asked to self-quarantine by any doctor, hospital,
or health agency within the last 14 days, or who are awaiting the results
of a COVID-19 viral test.
e The Federal Protective Service and Court Security Officers will enforce the
posted building restrictions. Visitors must review signage regarding the
criteria for exclusion from the courthouse and answer whether they meet
the criteria for restriction. Those answering “yes” to the criteria for
restriction will be denied access to the courthouse. Visitors who visibly
appear to have the symptoms listed above will also be denied entry to the
building. All other security requirements for entrance, such as showing
proper identification and passing through a magnetometer, remain in
effect.
e Visitors are expected to perform hand hygiene at the point of entry, and
practice social distancing while in the courthouse. Hand sanitizer will also
be available throughout the building.
Page 4 of 13
e Visitors will be asked to leave if they do not follow these standards or
maintain social distancing as directed, and may be found in contempt of
Court.
e Members of the public not permitted access to the courthouse may call for
assistance:
East St. Louis District Court Help Desk: 866-867-3169
Benton District Court Help Desk: 866-222-2104
East St. Louis Bankruptcy Court: 618-482-9400
Benton Bankruptcy Court: 618-435-2200
East St. Louis United States Marshals Service: 618-482-9336
Benton United States Marshals Service: 618-439-7701
Federal Public Defender’s Office: 314-496-3883 or 618-792-4047
e Additional information will be posted on each Court or agency’s public
webpage.
e All public events and ceremonies, such as school tours and civic events, are
canceled, subject to being reset.
III. The CARES Act and Criminal Proceedings
Section 15002(b) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
(“CARES Act”), H.R. 748 (2020), provides for video teleconferencing, or telephone
conferencing if video teleconferencing is not reasonably available, for certain criminal
proceedings, if the Judicial Conference of the United States finds that emergency
conditions caused by the COVID-19 outbreak will materially affect the functioning of
either the federal courts generally or a particular district court, and the chief judge of a
court covered by that finding authorizes video teleconferencing, or telephone
conferencing if video teleconferencing is not reasonably available. Additional case-bycase findings are required of the presiding judge relative to felony pleas and sentencings.
In any event, video teleconferencing and telephone conferencing can only occur with the
Page 5 of 13
consent of the defendant.
The Court finds, for the reasons stated above relative to the Implementation of the
COOP/COVID-19 Plan, that it cannot apply the recommended social distancing
measures in all situations without endangering the health of defendants, counsel, the
public, and court personnel, thereby necessitating the use of video teleconferencing, or
telephone conferencing if video teleconferencing is not reasonably available. As of the
date of this Order, telephone conferencing has been tested and is operational, and a
stable, secure video teleconferencing system is available in some, but not all,
circumstances. In-court, videoconferencing, and teleconferencing will all be utilized to
maximize the Court's ability to carry out its constitutional mission.
The Court AUTHORIZES the use of video teleconferencing, or telephone
conferencing if video teleconferencing is not reasonably available, for the following
criminal proceedings, as specified in the CARES Act:
e Detention hearings under 18 U.S.C. § 3142;
Initial appearances under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5;
Preliminary hearings under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1;
Waivers of Indictment under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(b);
Arraignments under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 10;
e Probation and supervised revocation proceedings under Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 32.1;
e Pretrial release revocation proceedings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148;
e Appearances under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 40;
e Misdemeanor pleas and sentencings under Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 43(b)(2);
e Proceedings under 18 U.S.C. § 403 (commonly known as the “Federal
Juvenile Delinquency Act”), except for contested transfer hearings and
juvenile delinquency adjudication or trial proceedings
The video teleconferencing or telephone conferencing authorized above may only
Page 6 of 13
take place with the consent of the defendant, or the juvenile, after consulting with
counsel.
In accordance with the CARES Act, if the district judge in a particular case finds
for specific reasons that the plea or sentencing in a case cannot be further delayed without
serious harm to the interests of justice, a felony plea under Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 11 and felony sentencing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 may be
conducted by video teleconference, or by telephone conference if video conference is not
reasonably available. However, video teleconferencing or telephone conferencing of
felony pleas under Rule 11 and felony sentencings under Rule 32 may only take place
with the consent of the defendant, or the juvenile, after consulting with counsel.
IV. Videoconferencing and Teleconferencing Protocols
In any traditional in-court proceeding —civil or criminal—that is conducted via
videoconference or teleconference due to the exigent circumstances stemming from the
COVID-19 outbreak, audio or video feeds will be available to the public and press to the
extent practicable. Information detailing how to access any audio and/or video feed of
court proceedings will be posted in the notice of setting on a case-by-case basis, and
general information will be published on the district court’s public web page
www.ilsd.uscourts.gov.
All attorneys are responsible for monitoring notices of settings and must relay
those notices to any other attorney who might be handling a case in the attorney’s
stead. If directed to participate via teleconference or videoconference, participants may
not participate in person without the permission of the Court.
Page 7 of 13
Counsel and other participants, and those monitoring remotely, are responsible
for their own computers and audio-video equipment. The Court does not provide
technical assistance.
Participants in a teleconference or videoconference, and those monitoring
remotely, must mute all electronic devices and audible notifications, and should conduct
themselves as if physically in the courtroom. Audio and video of any court proceeding
may not be recorded or rebroadcast in any manner. See ILSD Local Rule 83.5. Violators
may be held in contempt of court and face other penalties.
In the event a defendant in a criminal case does not consent to the use of video
teleconferencing or telephone conferencing under Sections 15002(b)(1-2) of the CARES
Act, credentialed members of the press and public may attend such hearings in person in
accordance with this Order, provided social distancing can be maintained. At the
discretion of the presiding judge, principal participants and the public and press may be
physically segregated from each other, including utilizing multiple rooms, and
videoconferencing and/or teleconferencing. Social distancing protocols will be required
in all proceedings, and the number of in-person participants may be limited based on the
capacity of the room, and in consideration of CDC guidance on social distancing.
Courtroom spectators are reminded that there are health and safety risks associated with
attending an in-person court hearing.
The Court recognizes that the public and the press have a qualified First
Amendment right of access to certain court proceedings and that the use of
videoconferencing and/or teleconferencing may implicate that right. Nonetheless, for the
Page 8 of 13
reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that these procedures are necessitated by the
emergency conditions caused by COVID-19 and must be implemented to prevent the
spread of the COVID-19 virus. See Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1, 9
(1986); Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501, 510 (1984); Walton v. Briley, 361
F.3d 431, 433 (7th Cir. 2004).
V. = District Court Filings and Proceedings
Any time a courthouse is closed to the public, filings will continue to be
processed in civil and criminal cases via the Case Management/ Electronic Case
Filing (“CM/ ECF”) system. For those without access to CM/ECF, documents
may be submitted by mail, or in the event of emergency, may be submitted by
email to: EmergencyFiling@ilsd.uscourts.gov. All emergency filings must
include an email address and phone number where the filer may be reached.
Filings submitted by mail will be processed upon receipt, albeit at a delayed
pace. (The impact of this delay is addressed below.) Payments by attorneys
utilizing the CM/ECF system will be processed via credit card utilizing
Pay.gov. Non-attorneys may make payments via credit card by calling the
Clerk’s Offices in East St. Louis or Benton between 9:00 a.m. and4:00 p.m.
Payments by check or money order will be accepted by mail and will be
processed upon receipt. Cash payments will not be accepted during this
period of exigent circumstances. Any pro se litigant filing a case via mail who
cannot secure a check or money order should submit his or her filing by mail,
and the Clerk’s Office will send a notice directing payment be submitted after
the courthouses reopen. Any questions may be directed to:
e East St. Louis District Court Help Desk: 866-867-3169
¢ Benton District Court Help Desk: 866-222-2104
Messages will be returned during business hours (9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.)
Civil jury trials and other civil matters, including bench trials, hearings, and
settlement conferences, may be scheduled as necessary for in-court
proceedings before any district or magistrate judge in the East St. Louis or
Benton courthouses as local contamination rates permit. Judges also shall have
discretion to utilize videoconferencing or teleconferencing and will send the
appropriate notice to counsel.
Page 9 of 13
In all civil cases, all deadlines, whether set by the Court, the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, or Local Rules, remain as set as of the date of this Order. More
specifically, deadlines previously extended by Administrative Orders Nos.
261, 262, and 263 (and any subsequent amendments) are not extended further
by this omnibus Order. Administrative Orders Nos. 261, 262, and 263 (and any
subsequent amendments), and this omnibus Order do not grant an extension
of any deadlines imposed by Civil Rules 50(b) or (d), 52(b), 59(b), (d), or (e),
or 60(b). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(2). If the COVID-19 public emergency results
in the Clerk’s Office being inaccessible, deadlines will be extended as set forth
in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(3). Litigants are cautioned that
Administrative Orders Nos. 261, 262, and 263 (and any subsequent
amendments), and this omnibus Order do not affect the rights to, or
deadlines concerning, any appeal from any decision of this Court. The
deadlines for filing a notice of appeal remain in place and must be followed
to preserve appellate rights. The Court invites parties to file an extension of
time to appeal under Appellate Rule 4(a)(5)(A) no later than 30 days after the
time prescribed by Rule 4(a). If a timely extension motion is filed, then the
Court deems that good cause exists for the extension in light of current public
health concerns. If a filing is mailed by a prisoner, the traditional “mailbox”
rule shall govern its filing date. If a filing is mailed by a non-prisoner, the filing
date shall be deemed to be the postmark date, subject to any party’s right to
move that a different date be used.
The public health crisis does not affect the Court's consideration of civil or
criminal motions that can be resolved without in-court proceedings.
With regard to criminal matters before the Court, the Court shall have
discretion to quash any previously issued arrest warrant and instead issue a
summons.
New arrestees will be scheduled for proceedings as expeditiously as possible.
The Court FINDS that any delay incurred in arrestees being brought before a
magistrate judge pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(a) during
this period of time, by its nature, to be a necessary delay to protect all parties,
counsel, and the public, as well as jail and court staff. Provisions of the Speedy
Trial Act are not triggered until “the filing date (and making public) of the
information or indictment” or “from the date the defendant has appeared
before a judicial officer of the court in which [the] charge is pending” —
whichever date last occurs. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1).
Magistrate judges shall provisionally appoint the Office of the Federal Public
Defender on any new or recent arrests in cases where counsel has not appeared,
subject to being vacated if the individual is later determined to not be indigent.
Page 10 of 13
Any such appointment will, of course, be vacated if private counsel enters an
appearance on behalf of a defendant.
Until further Order of the Court, all matters set for an in-person hearing,
counsel must make the necessary inquiries and notify the presiding judge and
opposing counsel if that attorney or any individuals the attorney intends to
bring to the courthouse meet any of the criteria for restriction from the
courthouse. The presiding judge will have sole discretion to determine whether
the proceeding should be delayed or can go forward, perhaps by alternative
means.
All detainees, upon arrival at the East St. Louis or Benton courthouses and
before appearance in Court, shall undergo screening for fever and other
outward signs of COVID-19 contamination; such screening shall be
administered by and/or at the direction of the United States Marshals Service
(USMS), or its agents or designees. The presiding judge must be notified if the
detainee exhibits risk factors. The judge shall have the discretion to order the
detainee returned to the facility from which he or she came. Videoconferencing
and teleconferencing and other technologies may also be utilized as
practicable, and participants in a hearing may be separated as directed by the
presiding judge in the interest of public health.
Change of plea and sentencing hearings may be delayed or have to be reset as
local contamination rates dictate. A defendant and/or counsel may file a
motion requesting an emergency hearing stating (1) the reason(s) why an
emergency setting is necessary; and (2)whether the defendant, after
consultation with counsel, consents to hold the hearing by video teleconference
or telephone. Counsel also shall notify the courtroom deputy clerk by phone
that an emergency motion has been filed.
Due to the possibility that the Court's ability to obtain an adequate spectrum
of jurors will be reduced, and the effect of public health recommendations and
restrictions on the availability of defendants, counsel, witnesses, and court staff
to be present in the courtroom, criminal jury trials may be delayed or have to
be reset as local contamination rates dictate.
Any time period of the continuances implemented by this Administrative
Order or other Orders of the Court due to the COVID-19 crisis will be excluded
under the Speedy Trial Act, as the Court specifically finds that the ends of
justice—in terms of the nationally recognized public health dangers and
Page 11 of 13
constitutional aspects of summoning a jury—served by the continuances
outweigh the best interests of the public and any defendant's right to a speedy
trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A). All necessary Orders will be entered
in each case.
Deadlines in criminal cases, including motions, briefing, and discovery
deadlines, whether set by the Court, by the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, or Local Rules, are not
impacted by this omnibus Order, except to the extent they are triggered by a
setting or deadline that has been continued or canceled. Motions for extension
of time, and all other motions in criminal cases will be entertained by the Court
as usual.
Grand juries shall continue to meet, with reasonable limits on grand jury
sessions imposed by the Court in consultation with the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Attorney admissions in-person ceremonies will not be performed until further
notice. Oath cards need not be notarized but must be signed. Instructions can
be found at https:/ /www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/ Atty Admission.aspx .
Court Assistance Program (“CAP”) meetings are canceled until further notice.
The Central Violations Bureau dockets in East St. Louis and Benton are
resumed in September 2020. Payments continue to be processed electronically
(instructions appear on each citation).
Naturalization ceremonies will be conducted by the United States Customs and
Immigration Service between now and December 31, 2020. If an individual
meets the criteria set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1448(c) as qualifying for the expedited
administration of the judicial oath, and if that individual is seeking a name
change pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1448(e), the Court, in coordination with the
United States Customs and Immigration Service, will arrange for
naturalization of that individual by a judicial officer. See Administrative Order
No. 268.
Announcements regarding any further restrictions to Court services will be
posted on the District Court’s public webpage https: / / www.ilsd.uscourts.gov,
and attorneys will receive updates and notices via the CM/ ECF system.
Page 12 of 13
VI. Bankruptcy Court Filings and Proceedings
All scheduled bankruptcy hearings, including emergency matters, will be held
telephonically, unless specially set by the presiding judge for an in-person hearing. The
Court will provide call in information to the parties prior to the hearing. For those
without access to CM/ECF, documents may be submitted by mail, or in the event of
emergency, may be submitted by email to: ilsbwebmaster@ilsb.uscourts.gov. All
emergency filings must include an email address and phone number where the filer may
be reached.
VIL Probation and Pretrial Services
The United States Probation and Pretrial Services Office will continue to
investigate and supervise individuals as ordered by the Court.
VII. Expiration of this Order
The Court will closely monitor the COVID-19 outbreak and any changes to the
guidance offered by the CDC and local public health officials and make necessary
adjustments in the interest of public health and administration of justice. The Court will
vacate or amend this Administrative Order no later than December 31, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 1** day of October 2020.
Teneo) onsg!
NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL
Chief U.S. District Judge
Page 13 of 13
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.