Veterans’ Medical Care: FY2008 Appropriations

Congressional research reportJan 22, 2008

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ

™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

’Š‘ȱ’›Š—ŠȱŠ—Š—Š•Šȱ

—Š•¢œȱ’—ȱŽŽ›Š—œȱ˜•’Œ¢ȱ

Š—žŠ›¢ȱŘŘǰȱŘŖŖŞȱ

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŝȬśŝŖŖȱ

ǯŒ›œǯ˜Ÿȱ

řŚŖŜřȱ

ȱŽ™˜›ȱ˜›ȱ˜—›Žœœ

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ž––Š›¢ȱ

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provides benefits to veterans who meet certain

eligibility rules. Benefits to veterans range from disability compensation and pensions to hospital

and medical care. The VA provides these benefits through three major operating units: the

Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), and the

National Cemetery Administration (NCA). The VHA is primarily a direct service provider of

primary care, specialized care, and related medical and social support services to veterans through

the nation’s largest integrated health-care system.

On February 5, 2007, the President submitted his FY2008 budget proposal to Congress. The total

amount requested by the Administration for the VHA for FY2008 was $34.6 billion, a 1.93%

increase in funding compared with the FY2007 enacted amount. For FY2008, the Administration

was requesting $27.2 billion for medical services, $3.4 billion for medical administration, $3.6

billion for medical facilities, and $411 million for medical and prosthetic research.

On June 15, 2007, the House passed its version of the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs

Appropriations bill (MILCON-VA appropriations bill) for FY2008 (H.R. 2642, H.Rept. 110-186).

H.R. 2642 provided $37.1 billion for the VHA for FY2008. This amount included $29.0 billion

for medical services, a $1.9 billion (6.9%) increase above the President’s request. H.R. 2642 also

included $3.5 billion for medical administration, $69 million above the Administration’s request

of $3.4 billion; $4.1 billion for medical facilities, a 14% increase over the President’s request; and

$480 million for medical and prosthetic research, a 17% increase over the President’s request of

$411 million. H.R. 2642 did not include any bill language authorizing fee increases as requested

by the Administration’s budget proposal for the VHA for FY2008.

On September 6, 2007, the Senate passed MILCON-VA appropriations bill for FY2008 (H.R.

2642, S.Rept. 110-85) with an amendment. H.R. 2642, as passed by the Senate, provided a total

of $37.2 billion for the VHA. This amount included $29.1 billion for medical services—a $3.2

billion (12.3%) increase over the FY2007 enacted amount and $1.9 billion over the FY2008

budget request—and $3.5 billion for medical administration, $75 million above the FY2008

Administration’s request. Furthermore, H.R. 2642, as passed by the Senate, provided $4.1 billion

for medical facilities, and $500 million for medical and prosthetic research. The Senate-passed

bill also did not include any bill language authorizing fee increases as requested by the President.

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (H.R. 2764) was signed into law (P.L. 110-161) on

December 26, 2007, and included the MILCON-VA Appropriations Act for FY2008. Under P.L.

110-161, the total amount of funding for the VHA is $37.2 billion.

This report will not be updated.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

˜—Ž—œȱ

Most Recent Developments............................................................................................................. 1

Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1

Eligibility for Veterans’ Health Care ............................................................................................... 4

“Promise of Free Health Care”.................................................................................................. 4

VHA Health-Care Enrollment................................................................................................... 5

Veteran’s Status................................................................................................................... 6

Priority Groups and Scheduling Appointments .................................................................. 7

Funding for the VHA....................................................................................................................... 8

Medical Services ....................................................................................................................... 8

Medical Administration............................................................................................................. 8

Medical Facilities ...................................................................................................................... 9

Medical and Prosthetic Research .............................................................................................. 9

Medical Care Collections Fund (MCCF) ................................................................................ 10

FY2007 Budget Summary............................................................................................................. 12

House Action........................................................................................................................... 12

Senate Action .......................................................................................................................... 12

Continuing Appropriations Resolution.................................................................................... 13

FY2007 Supplemental Appropriations.................................................................................... 13

FY2008 VHA Budget .................................................................................................................... 14

FY2008 Congressional Budget Resolution ............................................................................. 14

House Action........................................................................................................................... 14

Construction Projects ........................................................................................................ 15

Senate Action .......................................................................................................................... 15

Construction Projects ........................................................................................................ 16

Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY2008 ........................................................................ 16

Construction Projects ........................................................................................................ 17

Explanatory Statement ............................................................................................................ 17

Joint Efforts Between DOD and VA ................................................................................. 17

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) ........................................................................................... 17

Mental Health and Substance Abuse................................................................................. 17

Access to Medical Care in Remote Rural Areas ............................................................... 18

Electronic Medical Record ............................................................................................... 18

Key Budget Issues ......................................................................................................................... 22

Assess an Annual Enrollment Fee........................................................................................... 23

Increase Pharmacy Co-payments ............................................................................................ 23

Impact of Fee Proposals.................................................................................................... 24

Third-Party Offset of First-Party Debt .................................................................................... 24

Future Cost of Veterans’ Health Care...................................................................................... 27

’ž›Žœȱ

Figure 1. VHA Funding, FY2006-FY2008 ..................................................................................... 9

Figure 2. Present Co-payment Process.......................................................................................... 26

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

Š‹•Žœȱ

Table 1. VA and VHA Appropriations, FY2006-FY2008................................................................ 1

Table 2. Number of Veterans Enrolled in the VA Health-Care System ........................................... 3

Table 3. Number of Patients Receiving Care from the VA.............................................................. 4

Table 4. Medical Care Collections, FY2003-FY2006 ....................................................................11

Table 5. VHA Appropriations by Account, FY2006-FY2008 ....................................................... 19

Table 6. Appropriations for VA Construction Projects, FY2006-FY2008..................................... 21

™™Ž—’¡Žœȱ

Appendix A. Priority Groups and Their Eligibility Criteria .......................................................... 28

Appendix B. Veterans’ Payments for Health-Care Services, by Priority Group ........................... 30

Appendix C. Financial Income Thresholds for VA Health-Care Benefits..................................... 32

Appendix D. VHA Appropriations for FY2005 and FY2006........................................................ 33

˜—ŠŒœȱ

Author Contact Information .......................................................................................................... 35

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

˜œȱŽŒŽ—ȱŽŸŽ•˜™–Ž—œȱ

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (H.R. 2764), was passed by the House on December

17, 2007, and the Senate passed a measure the next day, December 18, with an amendment

(McConnell Amendment—adding funding for the Iraq war). The House agreed to the McConnell

Amendment on December 19. The bill was signed into law (P.L. 110-161) on December 26. The

Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008

(MILCON-VA Appropriations Act), was included as Division I of P.L. 110-161. Under P.L. 110161, the total amount of funding for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is $37.2 billion;

of this amount, $2.6 billion was designated as contingent emergency funding and was available

for obligation only after the President submitted a budget request to Congress. On January 17,

2008, the President transmitted a request to Congress designating $2.6 billion as an emergency

requirement in accordance with the provisions of P.L. 110-161.1 Table 1 provides funding levels

for VA and VHA as included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008.2

.VA and VHA Appropriations, FY2006-FY2008

Table 1

($ in thousands)

Total Department of

Veterans Affairs (VA)

Total Veterans Health

Administration (VHA)

Source:

FY2006

enacted

FY2007

enacted

FY2008

request

FY2008 House FY2008 Senate

(H.R. 2642)

(H.R. 2642)

$71,457,832

$79,550,522

$83,903,751

$87,696,839

$87,501,280

$87,595,142

$29,340,517

$34,024,013

$34,612,671

$37,122,000

$37,213,220

$37,201,220

S.Rept. 109-286, H.Rept. 109-464, H.Rept. 110-186, S.Rept. 110-85, Congressional Record

(December 17, 2007), pp. H16249-H16431.

FY2008

enacted

, vol. 153

ŠŒ”›˜ž—ȱ

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provides a range of benefits and services to veterans

who meet certain eligibility rules, including disability compensation and pensions, education,

training and rehabilitation services, hospital and medical care, assistance to homeless veterans,3

home loan guarantees, and death benefits that cover burial expenses.4 The VA carries out its

programs nationwide through three administrations and the board of veterans appeals (BVA). The

Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is responsible for health-care services and medical

research programs.5 The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) is responsible, among other

1

See http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/amendments/supplemental_1_17_08.pdf, last accessed on January 18,

2008.

2

For detailed information on funding for the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) and the National Cemetery

Administration (NCA), see CRS Report RL34038, Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies:

FY2008 Appropriations, by (name redacted), (name redacted), and (name redacted).

3

For detailed information on homeless veterans programs, see CRS Report RL34024, Veterans and Homelessness, by

(name redacted).

4

For a detailed description on eligibility for veterans disability benefits programs, see CRS Report RL33113, Veterans

Affairs: Basic Eligibility for Disability Benefit Programs, by (name redacted).

5

For a detailed description of veterans’ health-care issues, see CRS Report RL33993, Veterans’ Health Care Issues, by

(continued...)

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

things, for providing compensations, pensions, and education assistance.6 The National Cemetery

Administration (NCA)7 is responsible for maintaining national veterans cemeteries; providing

grants to states for establishing, expanding, or improving state veterans cemeteries; and providing

headstones and markers for the graves of eligible persons, among other things.

The VA’s budget includes both mandatory and discretionary spending accounts. Mandatory

funding supports disability compensation, pension benefits, vocational rehabilitation, and life

insurance, among other benefits and services. Discretionary funding supports a broad array of

benefits and services, including medical care. In FY2007, discretionary budget authority

accounted for about 48.1% of the total VA budget authority of approximately $80 billion, with

about 90% of this discretionary funding going toward supporting VA health-care programs.

The VHA operates the nation’s largest integrated direct health-care delivery system.8 The VA’s

health-care system is organized into 21 geographically defined Veterans Integrated Service

Networks (VISNs). Although policies and guidelines are developed at VA headquarters to be

applied throughout the VA health-care system, management authority for basic decision making

and budgetary responsibilities are delegated to the VISNs.9 Congressionally appropriated medical

care funds are allocated to the VISNs based on the Veterans Equitable Resource Allocation

(VERA) system, which generally bases funding on patient workload.10 Prior to the

implementation of the VERA system, resources were allocated to facilities primarily on the basis

of their historical expenditures. Unlike other federally funded health insurance programs, such as

Medicare and Medicaid, which finance medical care provided through the private sector, the

VHA provides care directly to veterans.

In FY2007, the VHA operated 155 medical centers, 135 nursing homes,11 717 ambulatory care

and community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs),12 and 209 Readjustment Counseling Centers

(Vet Centers).13 The VHA also pays for care provided to veterans by private-sector providers on a

(...continued)

(name redacted).

6

For a detailed description of veterans’ benefits issues, see CRS Report RL33985, Veterans’ Benefits: Issues in the

110th Congress, coordinated by (name redacted).

7

Established by the National Cemeteries Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-43).

8

Established on January 3, 1946, as the Department of Medicine and Surgery by P.L. 79-293, succeeded in 1989 by the

Veterans Health Services and Research Administration, renamed the Veterans Health Administration in 1991.

9

Jian Gao, Ying Wang and Joseph Engelhardt, “Logistic Analysis of Veterans’ Eligibility-Status Change,” Health

Services Management Research, vol. 18, (August 2005), p. 175.

10

About 90% of the VHA appropriation is allocated through VERA. Networks also receive appropriated funds not

allocated through VERA for such things as prosthetics, homeless programs, readjustment counseling, and clinical

training programs. VA facilities could also retain collections from insurance reimbursements and copayments, and use

these funds for the care of veterans.

11

Data on the number of hospitals and nursing homes include facilities damaged by Hurricane Katrina. The data are

current as of December 1, 2006.

12

Data on the number of CBOCs differ from source to source. Some count clinics located at VA hospitals, whereas

others count only freestanding CBOCs. The number represented in this report excludes clinics located in VA hospitals.

The VA plans to activate 38 new CBOCs in FY2007 and FY2008.

13

On February 7, 2007, the Department announced that it will be establishing 23 new Vet Centers in communities

across the nation during 2007 and 2008. New Vet Centers will be located in Montgomery, Alabama; Fayetteville,

Arkansas; Modesto, California; Grand Junction, Colorado; Orlando, Fort Myers, and Gainesville, Florida; Macon,

Georgia; Manhattan, Kansas; Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Cape Cod, Massachusetts; Saginaw and Iron Mountain,

Michigan; Berlin, New Hampshire; Las Cruces, New Mexico; Binghamton, Middletown, Nassau County, and

(continued...)

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Řȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

fee basis under certain circumstances. Inpatient and outpatient care is also provided in the private

sector to eligible dependents of veterans under the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the

Department of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA).14 In addition, the VHA provides grants for

construction of state-owned nursing homes and domiciliary facilities, and collaborates with the

Department of Defense (DOD) in sharing health-care resources and services.

During FY2007, the VHA had an estimated total enrolled veteran population of 7.9 million and

provided medical care to about 5.2 million unique veteran patients (see Tables 2 and 3).

According to VHA estimates, the number of unique veteran patients is estimated to increase by

approximately 110,000, from 5.2 million in FY2007 to 5.3 million in FY2008. As shown in Table

3, there would be a 2.4% increase in the total number of unique patients (both veterans and nonveterans), from 5.7 million in FY2007 to 5.8 million in FY2008.

Table 2. Number of Veterans Enrolled in the VA Health-Care System

Priority Groups

FY2006

Actual

FY2007

Estimate

FY2008

Estimate

1

912,787

915,068

917,349

2

522,829

524,135

525,442

3

996,063

998,552

1,001,041

4

241,716

242,320

242,924

5

2,538,228

2,544,571

2,550,913

6

265,253

265,916

266,579

5,476,876

5,490,562

5,504,248

7

218,248

218,793

219,339

8

2,177,314

2,182,755

2,188,194

Subtotal Priority Groups 7-8

2,395,562

2,401,548

2,407,533

Total Enrollees

7,872,438

7,892,110

7,911,781

Subtotal Priority Groups 1-6

Source:

Department of Veterans Affairs.

The total number of outpatient visits, including visits to Vet Centers, reached 60.2 million during

FY2006 and is projected to increase to 64.4 million in FY2007 and 67.4 million in FY2008.15 In

FY2007, the VHA estimates that it will spend approximately 64.8% of its medical services

obligations on outpatient care.16

(...continued)

Watertown, New York; Toledo, Ohio; Du Bois, Pennsylvania; Killeen, Texas; and Everett, Washington. During 2007,

the VA plans to open facilities in Grand Junction, Orlando, Cape Cod, Iron Mountain, Berlin, and Watertown. The

other new Vet Centers are scheduled to open in 2008.

14

For further information on CHAMPVA, see CRS Report RS22483, Health Care for Dependents and Survivors of

Veterans, by (name redacted) and Susan Janeczko.

15

This number excludes outpatient care provided on a contract basis and outpatient visits to readjustment counseling

centers. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, FY2008 Congressional Budget Submissions, Medical Programs, vol. 1 of

4, pp. 3-12.

16

Ibid., pp. 3-15.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

řȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

. Number of Patients Receiving Care from the VA

Table 3

Priority Groups

FY2006

Actual

FY2007

Estimate

FY2008

Estimate

1

768,537

718,452

717,262

2

342,023

349,751

356,566

3

568,740

600,337

618,513

4

177,563

198,922

207,535

5

1,645,781

1,850,707

1,933,212

6

134,425

121,664

131,785

Subtotal Priority Groups 1-6

3,637,069

3,839,833

3,964,873

7

197,901

339,021

345,561

8

1,195,612

1,003,223

981,327

Subtotal Priority Groups 7-8

1,393,513

1,342,244

1,326,888

Subtotal Unique Veteran Patientsa

5,030,582

5,182,077

5,291,761

Non-veteransb

435,488

503,069

527,415

5,466,070

5,685,146

5,819,176

Total Unique Patients

Department of Veterans Affairs.

a. Unique veteran patients include Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)

veterans. These patients number 155,272 in FY2006; estimated to be 209,308 in FY2007 and 263,345 in

FY2008.

b. Non-veterans include CHAMPVA patients, reimbursable patients with VA-affiliated hospitals and clinics,

care provided on a humanitarian basis, and employees receiving preventive occupational immunizations.

Source:

•’’‹’•’¢ȱ˜›ȱŽŽ›Š—œȂȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱŠ›Žȱ

ȃ›˜–’œŽȱ˜ȱ›ŽŽȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱŠ›ŽȄȱ

To understand some of the issues discussed later in this report, it is important to understand

eligibility for VA health care, the VA’s enrollment process, and its enrollment priority groups.

Unlike Medicare or Medicaid, VA health care is not an entitlement program. Contrary to

numerous claims made concerning “promises” to military personnel and veterans with regard to

“free health care for life,” not every veteran is automatically entitled to medical care from the

VA.17 Prior to eligibility reform in 1996, provisions of law governing eligibility for VA care were

complex and not uniform across all levels of care. All veterans were technically “eligible” for

hospital care and nursing home care, but eligibility did not by itself ensure access to care.

The Veterans’ Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, P.L. 104-262, established two

eligibility categories and required the VHA to manage the provision of hospital care and medical

17

For a detailed discussion of “promised benefits,” see CRS Report 98-1006, Military Health Care: The Issue of

“Promised” Benefits, by (name redacted).

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Śȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

services through an enrollment system based on a system of priorities.18 P.L. 104-262 authorized

the VA to provide all needed hospital care and medical services to veterans with serviceconnected disabilities, former prisoners of war, veterans exposed to toxic substances and

environmental hazards such as Agent Orange, veterans whose attributable income and net worth

are not greater than an established “means test,” and veterans of World War I. These veterans are

generally known as “higher priority” or “core” veterans (see Appendix A, discussed in more

detail below).19 The other category of veterans are those with no service-connected disabilities

and with attributable incomes above an established means test (see Appendix C).

P.L. 104-262 also authorized the VA to establish a patient enrollment system to manage access to

VA health care. As stated in the report language accompanying P.L. 104-262, “the Act would

direct the Secretary, in providing for the care of ‘core’ veterans, to establish and operate a system

of annual patient enrollment and require that veterans be enrolled in a manner giving relative

degrees of preference in accordance with specified priorities. At the same time, it would vest

discretion in the Secretary to determine the manner in which such enrollment system would

operate.”20

Furthermore, P.L. 104-262 was clear in its intent that the provision of health care to veterans was

dependent upon the available resources. The committee report accompanying P.L. 104-262 states

that the provision of hospital care and medical services would be provided to “the extent and in

the amount provided in advance in appropriations Acts for these purposes. Such language is

intended to clarify that these services would continue to depend upon discretionary

appropriations.”21

 ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȬŠ›Žȱ—›˜••–Ž—ȱ

As stated previously, P.L. 104-262 required the establishment of a national enrollment system to

manage the delivery of inpatient and outpatient medical care. The new eligibility standard was

created by Congress to “ensure that medical judgment rather than legal criteria will determine

when care will be provided and the level at which care will be furnished.”22

For most veterans, entry into the veterans’ health-care system begins by completing the

application for enrollment. Some veterans are exempt from the enrollment requirement if they

meet special eligibility requirements.23 A veteran may apply for enrollment by completing the

Application for Health Benefits (VA Form 10-10EZ) at any time during the year and submitting

18

U.S. Congress, House Committee on Veterans Affairs, Veterans’ Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, report

to accompany H.R. 3118, 104th Cong. 2nd sess., H.Rept. 104-690 p. 2.

19

Ibid., p.5.

20

Ibid., p.6.

21

Ibid., p.5.

22

Ibid., p.4.

23

Veterans do not need to apply for enrollment in the VA’s health-care system if they fall into one of the following

categories: veterans with a service-connected disability rated 50% or more (percentage ratings represent the average

impairment in earning capacity resulting from diseases and injuries encountered as a result of or incident to military

service; those with a rating of 50% or more are placed in Priority Group 1); less than one year has passed since the

veteran was discharged from military service for a disability that the military determined was incurred or aggravated in

the line of duty, but the VA has not yet rated; or the veteran is seeking care from the VA only for a service-connected

disability (even if the rating is only 10%).

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

śȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

the form online or in person at any VA medical center or clinic, or mailing or faxing the

completed form to the medical center or clinic of the veteran’s choosing.24 Once a veteran is

enrolled in the VA health-care system, the veteran remains in the system and does not have to

reapply for enrollment annually. However, those veterans who have been enrolled in Priority

Group 5 (see Appendix A, discussed in more detail below) based on income must submit a new

VA Form 10-10EZ annually with updated financial information demonstrating inability to defray

the expenses of necessary care.25

ŽŽ›Š—ȂœȱŠžœȱ

Eligibility for VA health care is based primarily on “veteran’s status” resulting from military

service. Veteran’s status is established by active-duty status in the military, naval, or air service

and an honorable discharge or release from active military service. Generally, persons enlisting in

one of the armed forces after September 7, 1980, and officers commissioned after October 16,

1981, must have completed two years of active duty or the full period of their initial service

obligation to be eligible for VA health-care benefits. Servicemembers discharged at any time

because of service-connected disabilities are not held to this requirement. Also, reservists that

were called to active duty and who completed the term for which they were called, and who were

granted an other than dishonorable discharge, are exempt from the 24 continuous months of

active duty requirement. National Guard members who were called to active duty by federal

executive order are also exempt from this two-year requirement if they (1) completed the term for

which they were called and (2) were granted an other than dishonorable discharge.

When not activated to full-time federal service, members of the reserve components and National

Guard have limited eligibility for VA health-care services. Members of the reserve components

may be granted service-connection for any injury they incurred or aggravated in the line of duty

while attending inactive duty training assemblies, annual training, active duty for training, or

while going directly to or returning directly from such duty. In addition, reserve component

service members may be granted service-connection for a heart attack or stoke if such an event

occurs during these same periods. The granting of service-connection makes them eligible to

receive care from the VA for those conditions. National Guard members are not granted serviceconnection for any injury, heart attack, or stroke that occurs while performing duty ordered by a

governor for state emergencies or activities.26

After veteran’s status has been established, the VA next places applicants into one of two

categories. The first group is composed of veterans with service-connected disabilities or with

incomes below an established means test. These veterans are regarded by the VA as “high

priority” veterans, and they are enrolled in Priority Groups 1-6 (see Appendix A). Veterans

enrolled in Priority Groups 1-6 include

•

veterans in need of care for a service-connected disability;27

24

VA Form 10-10EZ is available at https://www.1010ez.med.va.gov/sec/vha/1010ez/#Process.

38 C.F.R. §17.36 (d)(3)(iv) (2005).

26

38.U.S.C. §101(24); 38 C.F.R. §3.6(c).

27

The term “service-connected” means, with respect to disability, that such disability was incurred or aggravated in

line of duty in the active military, naval, or air service. The VA determines whether veterans have service-connected

disabilities and, for those with such disabilities, assigns ratings from 0 to 100% based on the severity of the disability.

Percentages are assigned in increments of 10%.

25

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Ŝȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

•

veterans who have a compensable service-connected condition;

•

veterans whose discharge or release from active military, naval, or air service was

for a compensable disability that was incurred or aggravated in the line of duty;

•

veterans who are former prisoners of war (POWs);

•

veterans awarded the Purple Heart;

•

veterans who have been determined by VA to be catastrophically disabled;

•

veterans of World War I;

•

veterans who were exposed to hazardous agents (such as Agent Orange in

Vietnam) while on active duty; and

•

veterans who have an annual income and net worth below a VA-established

means test threshold.

The VA looks at applicants’ income and net worth to determine their specific priority category

and whether they have to pay co-payments for nonservice-connected care. In addition, veterans

are asked to provide the VA with information on any health insurance coverage they have,

including coverage through employment or through a spouse. The VA may bill these payers for

treatment of conditions that are not a result of injuries or illnesses incurred or aggravated during

military service. Appendix B provides information on what categories of veterans pay for which

services.

The second group of veterans is composed of those who do not fall into one of the first six

priority groups—primarily veterans with nonservice-connected medical conditions and with

incomes and net worth above the VA-established means test threshold. These veterans are

enrolled in Priority Group 7 or 8.28 Appendix C provides information on income thresholds for

VA health-care benefits.

›’˜›’¢ȱ ›˜ž™œȱŠ—ȱŒ‘Žž•’—ȱ™™˜’—–Ž—œȱ

The VHA is mandated to provide priority care for non-emergency outpatient medical care for any

condition of a service-connected veteran rated 50% or more, or for a veteran’s service-connected

condition.29 According to VHA policies, patients with emergency or urgent medical needs must be

provided care, or must be scheduled to receive care as soon as practicable, independent of

service-connected status and whether care is purchased or provided directly by the VA. Veterans

who are service-connected 50% or more need to be scheduled to be seen within 30 days of the

desired date for any condition.

Veterans who are rated less than 50% service-connected disabled, and who require care for a

service-connected condition, need to be scheduled to be seen within 30 days of the desired date.

When VHA staff are in doubt as to whether the request for care is for a service-connected

28

The VA considers a veteran’s previous year’s total household income (both earned and unearned income, as well as

his/her spouse’s and dependent children’s income). Earned income is usually wages received from working. Unearned

income includes interest earned, dividends received, money from retirement funds, Social Security payments, annuities,

and earnings from other assets. The number of persons in the veterans family will be factored into the calculation to

determine the applicable income threshold. 38 C.F.R. § 17.36(b)(7) (2006).

29

VHA Directive 2006-055, October 11, 2006.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŝȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

condition, they are required to assume, on behalf of the veteran, that the veteran is entitled to

priority access and schedule within 30 days of the desired date.30

Veterans in other priority groups are to be scheduled to be seen within 120 days of the desired

date. According to VHA policies, all outpatient appointment requests must be acted on as soon as

possible, but no later than seven calendar days from the date of the request. The VHA also

requires that priority scheduling of any veteran must not affect the medical care of any other

previously scheduled veteran. Furthermore, VHA guidelines state that veterans with serviceconnected conditions cannot be prioritized over other veterans with more acute health-care

needs.31

ž—’—ȱ˜›ȱ‘Žȱ ȱ

The VHA is funded through multiple appropriations accounts that are supplemented by other

sources of revenue. Although the appropriations account structure has been subject to change

from year to year, the appropriation accounts used to support the VHA traditionally include

medical care, medical and prosthetic research, and medical administration. In addition, Congress

also appropriates funds for construction of medical facilities through a larger appropriations

account for construction for all VA facilities. In FY2004, “to provide better oversight and [to]

receive a more accurate accounting of funds,” Congress changed the VHA’s appropriations

structure.32 The Department of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development and

Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004 (P.L. 108-199, H.Rept. 108-401), funded VHA

through four accounts: (1) medical services, (2) medical administration, (3) medical facilities, and

(4) medical and prosthetic research. Provided below are brief descriptions of these accounts.

Ž’ŒŠ•ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽœȱ

The medical services account covers expenses for furnishing inpatient and outpatient care and

treatment of veterans and certain dependents, including care and treatment in non-VA facilities;

outpatient care on a fee basis; medical supplies and equipment; salaries and expenses of

employees hired under Title 38, United States Code; and aid to state veterans homes. In its

FY2008 budget request to Congress, the VA requested the transfer of food service operations

costs from the medical facilities appropriations to the medical services appropriations. The House

and Senate Appropriations Committees have concurred with this request.33

Ž’ŒŠ•ȱ–’—’œ›Š’˜—ȱ

The medical administration account provides funds for the expenses in the administration of

hospitals, nursing homes, and domiciliaries; billing and coding activities; quality of care

oversight; legal services; and procurement.

30

Ibid.

Ibid.

32

U.S. Congress, Conference Committees, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, conference report to accompany

H.R. 2673, 108th Cong., 1st sess., H.Rept. 108-401, p. 1036.

33

The cost of food service operations support hospital food service workers, provisions, and supplies related to the

direct care of patients.

31

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Şȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

Ž’ŒŠ•ȱŠŒ’•’’Žœȱ

The medical facilities account covers, among other things, expenses for the maintenance and

operation of VHA facilities; administrative expenses related to planning, design, project

management, real property acquisition and deposition, construction, and renovation of any VHA

facility; leases of facilities; and laundry services.

Ž’ŒŠ•ȱŠ—ȱ›˜œ‘Ž’ŒȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱ

This account provides funding for VA researchers to investigate a broad array of veteran-centric

health topics, such as treatment of mental health conditions, rehabilitation of veterans with limb

loss, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, organ transplantation, and the organization of

the health-care delivery system. VA researchers receive funding not only through this account but

also from the DOD, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and private sources.

As seen in Figure 1, the total level of funding for VHA increased between FY2006 and FY2008,

and most of this increase has been due to the increase in spending on medical services. As a

percentage of total VHA funding, spending on medical facilities, medical administration, and

medical and prosthetic research has been fairly stable.

Figure 1.VHA Funding, FY2006-FY2008

Chart prepared by CRS based on H.Rept. 109-95; S.Rept. 109-105; H.Rept. 109-305; H.Rept. 109-359;

H.Rept. 109-464; H.Rept. 109-494; S.Rept. 109-286; P.L. 110-5; H.Rept. 110-64; S.Rept. 110-37; H.Rept. 110-60;

Congressional Record, vol. 153, May 24, 2007, H5786-H5787; H.Rept. 110-186; S.Rept. 110-85; Congressional

Record, vol. 153, (September 7, 2007), S11271-S11278; and Congressional Record, vol. 153 (December 17, 2007),

pp. H16249-H16431.

Source:

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

şȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

Ž’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›Žȱ˜••ŽŒ’˜—œȱž—ȱǻǼȱ

In addition to direct appropriations for the above accounts, the Committees on Appropriations

include medical care cost recovery collections when considering the amount of resources needed

to provide funding for the VHA. The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985

(P.L. 99-272), enacted into law in 1986, gave the VHA the authority to bill some veterans and

most health-care insurers for nonservice-connected care provided to veterans enrolled in the VA

health-care system, to help defray the cost of delivering medical services to veterans.34

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-33) gave the VHA the authority to retain these funds

in the Medical Care Collections Fund (MCCF). Instead of returning the funds to the Treasury, the

VA can use them for medical services for veterans without fiscal year limitations.35 To increase

the VA’s third-party collections, P.L. 105-33 also gave the VA the authority to change its basis of

billing insurers from “reasonable costs” to “reasonable charges.”36 This change in billing was

intended to enhance VA collections to the extent that reasonable charges result in higher payments

than reasonable costs.37 In FY2004, the Administration’s budget requested consolidating several

medical existing collections accounts into one MCCF. The conferees of the Consolidated

Appropriations Act of 2004 (H.Rept. 108-401) recommended that collections that would

otherwise be deposited in the Health Services Improvement Fund (former name), Veterans

Extended Care Revolving Fund (former name), Special Therapeutic and Rehabilitation Activities

Fund (former name), Medical Facilities Revolving Fund (former name), and the Parking

Revolving Fund (former name) should be deposited in MCCF.38 The Consolidated Appropriations

Act of 2005, (P.L. 108-447, H.Rept. 108-792) provided the VA with permanent authority to

deposit funds from these five accounts into the MCCF. The funds deposited into the MCCF

would be available for medical services for veterans. These collected funds do not have to be

spent in any particular fiscal year and are available until expended.

The conferees of the FY2006 Military Construction, Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs

Appropriations Act (P.L. 109-114, H.Rept. 109-305), required the VA to establish a revenue

improvement demonstration project. The purpose of this pilot project is to provide a

“comprehensive restructuring of the complete revenue cycle including cash-flow management

and accounts receivable.”39 The conferees included this provision because the Appropriation

Committees were concerned that the VHA was collecting only 41% percent of the billed amounts

from third-party insurance companies. Currently, the VHA has established a pilot Consolidated

Patient Account Center in VISN 6.

34

Veterans’ Health-Care and Compensation Rate Amendments of 1985, 100 Stat. 372, 373, 383.

For a detailed history of funding for VHA from FY1995 to FY2004, see CRS Report RL32732, Veterans’ Medical

Care Funding: FY1995-FY2004, by (name redacted).

36

Under “reasonable costs,” the VA billed insurers based on its average cost to provide a particular episode of care.

Under “reasonable charges,” the VA bills insurers based on market pricing for health-care services.

37

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), VA Health Care: Third-Party Charges Based on Sound

Methodology; Implementation Challenges Remain, GAO/HEHS-99-124, June 1999.

38

For a detailed description of these former accounts, see CRS Report RL32548, Veterans’ Medical Care

Appropriations and Funding Process, by (name redacted).

39

U.S. Congress, Conference Committees, Military Construction, Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs

Appropriations Act, 2006, conference report to accompany H.R. 2528, 109th Congress, 1st session, H.Rept. 109-305, p.

43.

35

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗŖȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

As shown in Table 4, MCCF collections increased by 31%, from $1.5 billion in FY2003 to $2.0

billion in FY2006. During this same period, first-party collections increased by 26%, from $685

million to $863 million. In FY2006, first-party collections represented approximately 43% of

total MCCF collections.

Table 4. Medical Care Collections, FY2003-FY2006

($ in thousands)

FY2003

Actual

First-party pharmacy co-paymentsa

First-party co-payments for inpatient and

outpatient care

First-party long-term care co-paymentsb

Third-party insurance collections

Enhanced use leasing revenuec

Compensated work therapy collectionsd

Parking feese

Compensation and pension living expensesf

MCCF Total

FY2004

Actual

FY2005

Actual

FY2006

Actual

$576,554

$623,215

$648,204

$723,027

104,994

3,461

804,141

234

38,834

3,296

376

113,878

5,077

960,176

459

40,488

3,349

634

118,626

5,411

1,055,597

26,861

36,516

3,443

2,431

135,575

4,347

1,095,810

3,379

40,081

3,083

2,075

$1,531,890

$1,747,276

$1,897,089

$2,007,377

Table prepared by CRS based on data provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and U.S.

Department of Veterans Affairs, FY2008 Congressional Budget Submissions, Medical Programs, vol. 1 of 4, pp. 3-8.

Notes: The following accounts were not consolidated into the MCCF until FY2004: enhanced use leasing

revenue, compensated work therapy collections, parking fees, and compensation and pension living expenses.

Collection figures for these accounts for FY2003 are provided for comparison purposes.

a. In FY2002, Congress created the Health Services Improvement Fund (HSIF) to collect increases in

pharmacy co-payments (from $2 to $7 for a 30-day supply of outpatient medication) that went into effect

on February 4, 2002. The Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (P.L. 108-7) granted the VA the

authority to consolidate the HSIF with the MCCF and granted permanent authority to recover co-payments

for outpatient medications.

b. Authority to collect long-term care co-payments was established by the Millennium Health Care and

Benefits Act (P.L. 106-117). Certain veteran patients receiving extended care services from VA providers or

outside contractors are charged co-payments.

c. Under the enhanced-use lease authority, the VA may lease land or buildings to the private sector for up to

75 years. In return the VA receives fair consideration in cash and/or in-kind. Funds received as monetary

considerations may be used to provide care for veterans.

d. The compensated work therapy program is a comprehensive rehabilitation program that prepares veterans

for competitive employment and independent living. As part of their work therapy, veterans produce items

for sale or undertake subcontracts to provide certain products and/or services, such as providing

temporary staffing to a private firm. Funds collected from the sale of these products and/or services are

deposited into the MCCF.

e. The Parking program provides funds for construction and acquisition of parking garages at VA medical

facilities. The VA collects fees for use of these parking facilities.

f. Under the compensation and pension living expenses program, veterans who do not have either a spouse

or child would have their monthly pension reduced to $90 after the third month a veteran is admitted for

nursing home care. The difference between the veteran’s pension and the $90 is used for the operation of

the VA medical facility.

Sources:

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗŗȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

ŘŖŖŝȱžŽȱž––Š›¢ŚŖȱ

On February 6, 2006, the President submitted his FY2007 budget proposal to Congress. The

Administration requested $32.7 billion for the VHA, an 11.3% increase over the FY2006 enacted

amount of $29.3 billion and a 10% increase over FY2005 enacted amount of $29.7 billion (see

Table 5 and Appendix D). The FY2007 request included $25.5 billion for medical services, a

12% increase over the FY2006 enacted amount; $3.2 billion for medical administration, an 11.2%

increase over FY2006; $3.6 billion for medical facilities, an 8.2% increase over FY2006; and

$399 million for medical and prosthetic research, a 3.2% decrease from the FY2006 enacted

amount. (For a detailed breakdown of funding levels for the VHA for FY2005 and FY2006, see

Appendix D).

˜žœŽȱŒ’˜—ȱ

On May 19, 2006, the House passed its version of the Military Construction, Military Quality of

Life, and Veterans Affairs Appropriations bill (MIL-CON-QUAL-appropriations bill) for FY2007

(H.R. 5385, H.Rept. 109-464). H.R. 5385 provided $32.7 billion for the VHA, a $3.4 billion

(11.4%) increase over the FY2006 enacted amount of $29.3 billion and about the same as the

President’s request. This amount included $25.4 billion for medical services, $100 million less

than the President’s request and $2.6 billion (11.6%) over the FY2006 enacted amount of $22.8

billion. The MIL-CON-QUAL-appropriations bill for FY2007 also provided $3.3 billion for

medical administration, $100 million above the Administration’s request of $3.2 billion, and $3.6

billion for medical facilities, $25 million above the budget request. H.R. 5385 also provided $412

million for medical and prosthetic research, a 3.2% increase over the President’s request of $399

million (see Table 5).

Ž—ŠŽȱŒ’˜—ȱ

On November 14, 2006, the Senate passed by voice vote its version of the Military Construction

and Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill (MIL-CON-VA-appropriations

bill) for FY2007 (H.R. 5385, S.Rept. 109-286). H.R. 5385, as amended by the Senate, provided

$32.7 billion for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for FY2007, about the same as the

House-passed amount and the President’s request. This amount included $28.7 billion for medical

services, a 26.0% increase over the FY2006 enacted amount, a 12.5% increase over the

President’s request, and a 13.0% increase over the House-passed amount. The Senate-passed

version of H.R. 5385 also provided $3.6 billion for medical facilities, which was the same as the

Administration’s request and $25.0 million less than the House-passed amount, and $412 million

for medical and prosthetic research. This amount was the same as the House-passed amount and

$13.0 million above the President’s request (see Table 5).

40

For a detailed description of VA Medical Care Appropriations for FY2007, see CRS Report RL33409, Veterans’

Medical Care: FY2007 Appropriations, by (name redacted).

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗŘȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

˜—’—ž’—ȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱŽœ˜•ž’˜—ȱ

At the end of the 109th Congress, Congress did not pass the MIL-CON-VA-appropriations bill for

FY2007, and funded most government agencies, including the VA, through a series of Continuing

Appropriations Resolutions (P.L. 109-289, division B, as amended by P.L. 109-369 and P.L. 109383). On January 31, 2007, the House passed the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution,

2007 (H.J.Res. 20), and the Senate passed it without amendment on February 14.41 On February

15, 2007, the President signed into law the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007

(H.J.Res. 20, P.L. 110-5). It provided $32.7 billion for the VHA for FY2007, a $14.7 million

increase over the President’s request and $3.3 billion above the FY2006 enacted amount. This

amount included $25.5 billion for medical services, $3.2 billion for medical administration, $3.6

billion for medical facilities, and $414 million for medical and prosthetic research. These

amounts were the same as the President’s request, except for the medical and prosthetic research

account, which was $15 million above the President’s request. The Revised Continuing

Appropriations Resolution did not include any provisions that would have given the VA the

authority to implement fee increases as requested by the Administration’s budget proposal for the

VHA for FY2007.

ŘŖŖŝȱž™™•Ž–Ž—Š•ȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

On May 24, 2007, the House and Senate approved the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans’ Care,

Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (H.R. 2206). The bill was

signed into law on May 25 (P.L. 110-28). Among other things, P.L. 110-28 provided a total of

$1.34 billion for the VHA for FY2007. This amount was in addition to the amount appropriated

under P.L. 110-5. This amount included $400 million for medical services:42 (1) $9.4 million for

polytrauma residential transition rehabilitation programs; (2) $10 million for additional transition

caseworkers; (3) $20 million for substance abuse treatment programs; (4) $20 million for

readjustment counseling (Vet Centers); (5) $10 million for blind rehabilitation services; (6) $100

million for enhancement of mental health services; (7) $8 million for polytrauma support clinic

teams; (8) $5.4 million for additional polytrauma points of contact; (9) $193 million for treatment

of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans; and (10) $25

million for prosthetics.

P.L. 110-28 also provided $326 million for the Construction, Minor Projects account, with

specific funding of $36.0 million for construction costs related to establishing polytrauma

residential transitional rehabilitation programs.43 It also provided $250 million for medical

administration and $595 million for medical facilities, including specific funding of (1) $45.0

million for facility and equipment upgrades at polytrauma centers and (2) $550 million for nonrecurring maintenance to address structural deficiencies in VA medical facilities.44

41

To calculate the total funding level remaining for the VA in FY2007, the Department would subtract the funding

provided in the previously enacted FY2007 Continuing Resolutions from the amount provided in P.L. 110-5.

42

The initial amount enacted was $466.7 million. P.L. 110-161 (H.R. 2764) transferred $66 million from the FY2007

medical services account to the construction, major projects account for FY2007 to fund a new Level I polytrauma

center to be located in San Antonio, Texas.

43

Conference Report published in Congressional Record, vol. 153, part II (May 24, 2007), pp. H5776-H5910.

44

A list of structural deficiencies identified by the VA can be found at http://www1.va.gov/opa/pressrel/docs/

Environment_of_Care_Roll-up.pdf.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗřȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

ŘŖŖŞȱ ȱžŽȱ

On February 5, 2007, the President submitted his FY2008 budget proposal to Congress. The total

amount requested by the Administration for the VHA for FY2008 was $34.6 billion, a 1.93%

increase in funding compared with the FY2007 enacted amount. The total amount of funding that

would have been available for the VHA under the President’s budget proposal for FY2008,

including collections, was approximately $37.0 billion (see Table 5). For FY2008, the

Administration requested $27.2 billion for medical services, a $1.2 billion, or 4.8%, increase in

funding over the FY2007 enacted amount. The Administration’s budget proposal also requested

$3.4 billion for medical administration, $3.6 billion for medical facilities, and $411 million for

medical and prosthetic research (see Table 5). As in FY2003, FY2004, FY2005, FY2006, and

FY2007, the Administration included several cost-sharing proposals. These legislative proposals

are discussed in detail in the “Key Budget Issues” section at the end of this report.

ŘŖŖŞȱ˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱžŽȱŽœ˜•ž’˜—ȱ

On May 17, 2007, the House and Senate adopted the Conference Report (H.Rept. 110-153) to

accompany the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for FY2008 (S.Con.Res. 21). The

conference agreement provided a total of $85.3 billion in budget authority for all veterans

benefits and services for FY2008, and a total of $452.8 billion in budget authority for FY2008FY2012. Of the amount allocated for FY2008, the conference agreement provided $43.1 billion

for discretionary veterans’ programs, which consists mainly of VA medical care. Furthermore, the

conference agreement rejected the veterans’ health-care enrollment fees and co-payment increases

that were proposed by the President’s budget request.

˜žœŽȱŒ’˜—ȱ

On May 22, 2007, the House Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Military Construction,

Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies, approved by voice vote a draft measure recommending

funding levels for FY2008 for military construction programs, the VA, and related agencies. On

June 6, the full House Appropriations Committee recommended $37.1 billion for the VHA for

FY2008, a 9.3% increase over the FY2007 enacted amount of $34.0 billion and 7.3% above the

President’s request. This amount included $28.9 billion for medical services, $1.9 billion (6.9%)

above than the President’s request and $2.9 billion (12.0%) over the FY2007 enacted amount of

$26.0 billion. Of the amount recommended for the medical services account, the committee

included bill language stipulating $2.9 billion for speciality mental health care, $130 million for

the homeless veterans grant and per diem program, $429 million for the substance abuse program,

and $100 million for blind rehabilitation services.

The committee recommendation also included $3.6 billion for medical administration, $193

million above the Administration’s request of $3.4 billion; $4.1 billion for medical facilities, a

14% increase over the President’s request; and $480 million for medical and prosthetic research, a

17% increase over the President’s request of $411 million (see Table 5). The committee did not

recommend any fee increases as requested by the Administration’s budget proposal for the VHA

for FY2008. The Military Construction and Veterans Affairs appropriations bill for FY2008 (H.R.

2642, H.Rept. 110-186) was reported out of committee on June 11.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗŚȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

On June 15, 2007, the House passed H.R. 2642. As amended, H.R. 2642 provided $29.0 billion

for medical services. This included the transfer of $125 million from the medical administration

account to the medical services account. The reason for this transfer was because during House

floor debate, Representative Shelley Moore Capito offered an amendment to transfer $5 million

to the medical services account for the establishment of an Office of Rural Health within the

Office of the Under Secretary for Health, as directed by P.L. 109-461. Representative Jerry Moran

also offered an amendment to transfer $120 million to the medical services account to increase

funding for the Veterans Beneficiary Travel Program.

The MILCON-VA appropriations bill, as amended, also provided $3.5 billion for the medical

administration account, $68.6 million above the FY2008 request and $82.6 million above the

FY2007 enacted amount. All other amounts for the VHA were equal to the committeerecommended funding levels.

˜—œ›žŒ’˜—ȱ›˜“ŽŒœȱ

H.R. 2642 has provided approximately $2.2 billion for VA construction projects (excluding grants

for construction of state veterans cemeteries), including funding for Capital Asset Realignment

for Enhanced Services (CARES) projects (see Table 6).45 A large portion of this amount was for

construction and building improvements of VA medical facilities. The House Appropriations

Committee did not recommended any funding amounts for various construction and projects

submitted by Members of Congress or by the Administration. According to H.Rept. 110-186,

“individual project allocations will be considered comprehensively after the Committee has

properly analyzed all relevant information.”46

Ž—ŠŽȱŒ’˜—ȱ

On June 13, 2007, the Senate Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Military

Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies, approved a draft version of the MILCONVA appropriations bill. On June 14, the full Senate Appropriations Committee approved the

measure. The bill was reported to the Senate on June 18 (S. 1645, S.Rept. 110-85). S. 1645, as

reported, provided a total of $37.2 billion for the VHA. This amount includes $29.0 billion for

medical services, a $3 billion (11.5%) increase over the FY2007 enacted amount and $1.8 billion

over the FY2008 budget request, and $3.6 billion for medical administration, $214 million (6.2%)

above the FY2007 enacted amount and $200 million above the FY2008 Administration’s request.

Furthermore, the Senate version of the MILCON-VA appropriations bill, as reported, provided

$4.1 billion for medical facilities—a 14.0% increase over the FY2008 request and 1.7% less than

the FY2007 enacted amount—and $500 million for medical and prosthetic research—a 12%

increase over the FY2007 enacted amount, a 22.0% increase over the FY2008 request, and 4.2%

above the House-passed amount. The committee did not recommend any fee increases as

requested by the Administration’s budget proposal for the VHA for FY2008.

45

For a detailed description of the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) program, see CRS

Report RL33993, Veterans’ Health Care Issues, by (name redacted).

46

U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies

Appropriations Bill, 2008, report to accompany H.R. 2642, 110th Congress, 1st session, H.Rept. 110-186, p. 51.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗśȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

On September 6, 2007, the Senate passed H.R. 2642 with an amendment to reflect the Senate

Appropriations Committee-approved measure (S. 1645, S.Rept. 110-85). During Senate floor

debate, an amendment offered by Senator Jon Tester was approved to transfer $125 million from

the medical administration account to the medical services account. This additional amount of

funding would have been available for the Veterans Beneficiary Travel Program. With this

transfer of funds, $29.1 billion would have been available for medical services—a $3.2 billion

(12.3%) increase over the FY2007 enacted amount and $1.9 billion over the FY2008 budget

request—and $3.5 billion would have been available for medical administration, $75 million

above the FY2008 Administration’s request (Table 5). All other amounts for the VHA were equal

to the committee-recommended funding levels.

˜—œ›žŒ’˜—ȱ›˜“ŽŒœȱ

H.R. 2642, as amended by the Senate, provided a total of $1.7 billion for VA construction projects

(Table 6).47 Unlike the House Appropriations Committee, the Senate Appropriations Committee

provided funding for specific construction projects requested by the President. However, the

committee continued the practice of not earmarking major construction projects that are not

requested in the President’s budget proposal.

˜—œ˜•’ŠŽȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱŒȱ˜›ȱŘŖŖŞȱ

At the end of 2007, Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY2008 (H.R.

2764), an omnibus measure that combined the 11 outstanding appropriations bills for FY2008.48

H.R. 2764 was passed by the House on December 17, 2007; the Senate passed the measure the

next day, December 18, with an amendment (McConnell Amendment—adding funding for the

Iraq war). The House agreed to the McConnell Amendment on December 19. The bill was signed

into law (P.L. 110-161) on December 26. Division I of H.R. 2764 included the Military

Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008 (MILCON-VA

Appropriations Act).

The MILCON-VA Appropriation Act provided $37.2 billion for VHA for FY2008, which is $2.6

billion above the Administration’s request for FY2008 (see Table 5). Of this amount, $2.6 billion

(the amount above the Administration’s request) was designated as contingent emergency funding

and was to be available for obligation only after the President submitted a budget request to

Congress. On January 17, 2008, the President submitted a budget request to Congress, requesting

this additional amount and designating it as an emergency requirement. Of the total amount

appropriated for VHA, $29.1 billion has been allocated to the medical services account, which is

almost $2 billion above the President’s FY2008 request. The amount appropriated for medical

services includes

•

an additional $125 million to increase the beneficiary travel reimbursement

mileage rate to 28.5 cents per mile,

•

an additional $70 million for substance abuse services,

47

This amounts excludes grants for construction of state veterans cemeteries, which are funded under a separate

account.

48

The only appropriations bill that passed as a stand alone measure was the Department of Defense Appropriations

Act, 2008 (H.Rept. 110-434), which was signed into law on November 13 (P.L. 110-116).

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗŜȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

•

an additional $12.5 million for expanded outpatient services for the blind, and

•

an additional $15 million for Vet Centers.49

The explanatory statement (discussed below) also stipulates that of the total amount appropriated

for medical services, not less than $2.9 billion shall be expended for specialty mental health care,

and not less than $130 million shall be expended for the homeless grants and per diem program.

˜—œ›žŒ’˜—ȱ›˜“ŽŒœȱ

P.L. 110-161 has appropriated approximately $1.9 billion for VA construction projects, an $818

million increase over the Administration’s request. This increase in funding was provided to

address insufficient funding levels in the advanced planning fund and to compensate for cost

adjustments to previously appropriated major construction projects. The Consolidated

Appropriations Act for FY2008 provided funding for specific VA construction projects as

requested by the Administration.

¡™•Š—Š˜›¢ȱŠŽ–Ž—ȱ

The explanatory statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764, P.L.

110-161) included several major areas of interest to the Appropriations Committees, and

incorporated some report language from H.Rept. 110-186, and S.Rept. 110-85.

˜’—ȱ˜›œȱŽ ŽŽ—ȱȱŠ—ȱȱ

The Appropriation Committees have urged both DOD and VA to seek every opportunity to

partner to improve the continuity of care for veterans through: joint clinics; joint Centers of

Excellence for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI); joint

research and/or treatment; and the development of joint clinical practice guidelines for

polytrauma injury, TBI, burns, and amputee care, among other things.

›Šž–Š’Œȱ›Š’—ȱ —“ž›¢ȱǻ Ǽȱ

Currently, there is no medical diagnostic code specific to TBI, therefore, it is a challenge to

quantify the number of TBI cases. Presently, both DOD and VA are working with the National

Center for Health Statistics to refine current International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision

(ICD—9) codes to better reflect the TBI patient population within both DOD and VA. Beginning

with FY2009, the appropriators are directing the Administration to include TBI as a select

program within the medical services account in order that committees might better account for

special needs of these patients.

Ž—Š•ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱŠ—ȱž‹œŠ—ŒŽȱ‹žœŽȱ

The Appropriation Committees expressed concern about insufficient funding levels for mental

health and substance abuse services in the FY2008 budget request. The Administration’s budget

49

Congressional Record, vol. 153 (December 17, 2007), pp. H16386.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗŝȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

request had included a reduction in the number of inpatient beds for psychiatric care and an

anticipated increase of less than one percent for substance abuse services. The Consolidated

Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764, P.L. 110-161) includes increased funding within the medical

services account in order to increase access to substance abuse services, and ensure that adequate

inpatient psychiatric care is maintained. The appropriators also directed the VA to reexamine the

policy for a reduction in psychiatric inpatient care, taking into account the needs of returning OIF

and OEF veterans. Furthermore, the explanatory statement directs the VA not to reduce the

number of inpatient psychiatric beds at any facility that currently has a waiting list.

ŒŒŽœœȱ˜ȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›Žȱ’—ȱŽ–˜Žȱž›Š•ȱ›ŽŠœȱ

Veterans access to VA care in remote rural areas has been a long standing issue. To address this

issue the appropriators have directed the VA to provide a report to the committees that includes a

description of the unique challenges and costs faced by veterans in remote rural areas when

obtaining medical services from the VA, and the need to improve access to locally administered

care for veterans who reside in remote rural areas. The report should also identify the need to

fund alternative sources of medical services in areas where VA medical facilities are not

accessible to veterans without them leaving such areas. Moreover, the report should also contain

an assessment of the potential for increasing local access to medical services for veterans in

remote rural areas through strategic partnerships with other government and local private health

care providers.

•ŽŒ›˜—’ŒȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŽŒ˜›ȱ

The explanatory statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764, P.L.

110-161) directs the DOD and VA to provide a joint report to the Committees on Appropriations

detailing the actions being taken by each Department to achieve an interoperable electronic

medical record (EMR) system. Furthermore, the report must identify all ongoing and planned

projects and programs within both DOD and VA addressing interoperability. Similar language has

been included in the Defense Appropriations conference report (H.Rept. 110-434).

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŗŞȱ

ȱ

.VHA Appropriations by Account, FY2006-FY2008

Table 5

($ in thousands)

Program

Medical services

Emergency

appropriations

Emergency

appropriations—

Defense, the Global

War on Terror, and

Hurricane Recovery

(P.L. 109-234)

Emergency

appropriations—Avian

Flu Pandemic (P.L. 109148)

Emergency

appropriations—U.S.

Troop Readiness,

Veterans’ Care, Katrina

Recovery, and Iraq

Accountability (P.L. 11028)

Contingent emergency

(P.L. 110-161)

Subtotal medical services

Medical administration

Emergency

appropriations (P.L. 11028)

Ȭŗşȱ

FY2006

enacted

FY2007

request

FY2007

House

FY2007

Senate

FY2007

enacted

FY2008

request

FY2008

FY2008

House

Senate

(H.R. 2642) (H.R. 2642)

FY2008

enacted

$21,322,141

$25,512,000

$25,412,000

$28,689,000

$25,518,254

$27,167,671

$29,031,400

$29,104,220

$27,167,671

1,225,000

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

198,265

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

27,000

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

414,982

454,131

400,778a

—

—

—

—

—

22,772,406

2,858,442

—

25,512,000

3,177,000

—

25,826,982

3,277,000

—

29,143,131

—

—

25,919,032

3,177,968

—

27,167,671

3,442,000

—

29,031,400

3,510,600

—

29,104,220

3,517,000

1,936,549

29,104,220

3,442,000

—

—

256,300

250,000

250,000

—

—

—

—

ȱ

Program

Contingent emergency

(P.L. 110-161)

Subtotal medical

administration

Medical facilities

Emergency

appropriations (P.L. 11028)

Contingent emergency

(P.L. 110-161)

Subtotal medical facilities

Medical and prosthetic

research

Emergency

appropriations (P.L. 11028)

Contingent emergency

(P.L. 110-161)

Subtotal medical and

prosthetic research

Total VHA

appropriations

(without collections)

FY2006

enacted

FY2007

request

FY2007

House

FY2007

Senate

FY2007

enacted

FY2008

FY2008

House

Senate

(H.R. 2642) (H.R. 2642)

FY2008

request

FY2008

enacted

75,000

2,858,442

3,297,669

3,177,000

3,569,000

3,533,300

3,594,000

250,000

3,569,000

3,427,968

3,569,533

3,442,000

3,592,000

3,510,600

4,100,000

3,517,000

4,092,000

3,517,000

3,592,000

—

—

595,000

595,000

595,000

—

—

—

—

—

3,297,669

—

3,569,000

—

4,189,000

—

4,164,000

—

4,164,533

—

3,592,000

—

4,100,000

—

4,092,000

508,000

4,100,000

412,000

399,000

412,000

412,000

413,980

411,000

480,000

500,000

411,000

—

—

35,000

30,000

32,500

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

69,000

412,000

399,000

447,000

442,000

446,480

411,000

480,000

500,000

480,000

29,340,517

32,657,000

33,996,282

33,999,131

33,958,013

34,612,671

37,122,000

37,213,220

37,201,220

2,170,000

2,329,000

2,329,000

2,329,000

2,329,000

2,414,000

2,414,000

2,414,000

2,414,000

Medical care cost

collection (MCCF)

Total: VHA

(appropriations and

collections)

$31,510,517 $34,986,000 $36,325,282 $36,328,131 $36,287,013 $37,026,671 $39,536,000 $39,627,220 $39,615,220

Sources: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on H.Rept. 109-95; S.Rept. 109-105; H.Rept. 109-305; H.Rept. 109-359; H.Rept. 109-464; H.Rept.

109-494; S.Rept. 109-286; P.L. 110-5; H.Rept. 110-64; S.Rept. 110-37; H.Rept. 110-60; Congressional Record, vol. 153, May 24, 2007, H5786-H5787; H.Rept. 110-186; S.Rept.

110-85; Congressional Record, vol. 153, (September 7, 2007), S11271-S11278; and Congressional Record, vol. 153 (December 17, 2007), pp.H16249-H16431.

a. P.L. 110-161 (H.R. 2764) transferred $66 million from the FY2007 medical services account to the construction major, projects account for FY2007.

ȬŘŖȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

. Appropriations for VA Construction Projects, FY2006-FY2008

Table 6

($ in thousands)

FY2008

Construction, major

projectsa

Emergency

Appropriations—Gulf

Coast Hurricanes (P.L.

109-148)

Emergency

Appropriations—

Defense, the Global

War on Terror, and

Hurricane Recovery

(P.L. 109-234)

Contingent emergency

(P.L. 110-161)

Subtotal

construction, major

projects

Construction, minor

projectsc

Emergency

Appropriations—Gulf

Coast Hurricanes (P.L.

109-148)

Emergency

appropriations—U.S.

Troop Readiness,

Veterans’ Care,

Katrina Recovery, and

Iraq Accountability

(P.L. 110-28)

Contingent emergency

(P.L. 110-161)

Subtotal

construction, minor

projects

FY2008

FY2006

FY2007

FY2008

House

Senate

FY2008

Enacted

enacted

Request

(H.R. 2642)

(H.R. 2642)

enacted

$607,100

$465,000b

$727,400

$1,410,800

$727,400

$727,400

367,500

—

—

—

—

—

585,919

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

341,700

1,560,519

465,000

727,400

1,410,800

727,400

1,069,100

198,937

198,937

233,396

615,000

751,398

233,396

1,800

—

—

—

—

—

—

326,000

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

397,139

200,737

524,937

233,396

615,000

751,398

630,535

85,000

85,000

85,000

165,000

250,000

85,000

Grants for

construction of state

extended care

facilitiesd

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Řŗȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂ Ž’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

ȱ

FY2008

FY2008

FY2006

FY2007

FY2008

House

Senate

FY2008

Enacted

enacted

Request

(H.R. 2642)

(H.R. 2642)

enacted

Contingent emergency

(P.L. 110-161)

—

—

—

—

—

80,000

85,000

85,000

85,000

165,000

250,000

165,000

$1,846,256

$1,074,937

$1,045,796

$2,190,800

$1,728,798

$1,864,635

Subtotal Grants for

construction of state

extended care

facilities

Total

Sources: Table prepared by CRS based on H.Rept. 109-464; H.Rept. 109-494; S.Rept. 109-286; P.L. 110-5;

, vol. 153, May 24, 2007, H5786-H5787;

H.Rept. 110-186; S.Rept. 110-85; Congressional Record, vol. 153, September 7, 2007, S11271-S11278; and

Congressional Record, vol.153 (December 17, 2007), pp. H16249-H16431.

Note: This table excludes grants for construction of state veterans cemeteries.

a. This account provides funds for constructing, altering, extending, and improving any VA facility, including

planning, assessments of needs, architectural and engineering services, CARES projects, and site acquisition,

where the estimated cost of a project is $10 million or more or where funds for a project were made

available in a previous major project appropriation. Emphasis is placed on correction of safety code

deficiencies in existing VA medical facilities.

b. The initial amount enacted for FY2007 was $399 million. P.L. 110-161 (H.R. 2764) transferred $66.0 million

from the FY2007 medical services account to the construction, major projects account for FY2007.

c. This account provides funds for constructing, altering, extending and improving any VA facility, including

planning, architectural and engineering services, CARES projects, and site acquisition, where the estimated

cost of a project is less than $10 million. VA medical center projects that need minor improvements costing

$500,000 or more are funded from this account.

d. This account provides grants to states to acquire or construct state nursing home and domiciliary facilities,

and to remodel, modify, or alter existing hospitals, nursing homes, and domiciliary facilities in state homes.

A grant may not exceed 65% of the total cost of the project. P.L. 102-585 granted permanent authority for

this program, and P.L. 104-262 added Adult Day Health Care as another level of care that may be provided

by state homes. This is a no-year account.

H.Rept. 110-64; S.Rept. 110-37; H.Rept. 110-60; Congressional Record

Ž¢ȱžŽȱ œœžŽœȱ

In its FY2008 budget request, the Administration has put forward several legislative proposals.

These proposals are similar to previous ones included in the Administration’s budget requests for

FY2003, FY2004, FY2005, FY2006, and FY2007 and rejected by Congress each year.50

However, unlike previous budget proposals, revenue from the proposals in the FY2008 budget

request would not be deposited in the Medical Care Collections Fund (MCCF), but would be

classified as mandatory receipts to the Treasury. Aside from the Administration’s budget

proposals, the House and Senate Appropriations Committees have expressed concern on the long-

50

In FY2003, the VA proposed a $1,500 deductible for all Priority Group 7 veterans for nonservice-connected

disabilities. For proposals included in FY2004, FY2005, FY2006, and FY2007, see CRS Report RL32548, Veterans’

Medical Care Appropriations and Funding Process, by (name redacted); CRS Report RL32975,

Veterans’

Medical Care: FY2006 Appropriations, by (name redacted); and CRS Report RL33409,

Veterans’ Medical

Care: FY2007 Appropriations, by (name redacted).

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŘŘȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

term cost of providing health care for veterans and the Administration’s inability to accurately

estimate the future cost of providing those services.51

The President’s FY2008 budget request includes three major policy proposals:

•

Assess a tiered annual enrollment fee for all Priority 7 and 8 veterans based on

the family income of the veteran.

•

Increase pharmaceutical co-payments from $8 to $15 (for each 30-day

prescription) for all enrolled veterans in Priority Groups 7 and 8.

•

Bill veterans receiving treatment for nonservice-connected conditions for the

entire co-payment amount.

A detailed description of these budget proposals follows.

œœŽœœȱŠ—ȱ——žŠ•ȱ—›˜••–Ž—ȱŽŽȱ

The Administration is proposing a tiered annual enrollment fee, which is structured to charge

$250 for Priority 7 and 8 veterans with family incomes from $50,000 to $74,999; $500 for those

with family incomes from $75,000 to $99,999; and $750 for those with family incomes equal to

or greater than $100,000. The VA has estimated that this proposal would contribute more than

$138 million to the Treasury annually, beginning in FY2009, and will increase revenue by $526

million over five years.

The MILCON-VA Appropriation Act (P.L. 110-161) does not include any bill language that

would give the VA the authority to impose enrollment fees.

—Œ›ŽŠœŽȱ‘Š›–ŠŒ¢ȱ˜Ȭ™Š¢–Ž—œȱ

The Administration proposes increasing the pharmacy co-payments from $8 to $15 for all

enrolled Priority Group 7 and Priority Group 8 veterans whenever they obtain medication from

the VA on an outpatient basis for the treatment of a nonservice-connected condition. The

Administration put forward this proposal in its FY2004, FY2005, FY2006, and FY2007 budget

requests as well, but did not receive any approval from Congress. At present, veterans in Priority

Groups 2-8 pay $8 for a 30-day supply of medication, including over-the-counter medications.52

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-508) authorized the VA to charge most

veterans $2 for each 30-day supply of medication furnished on an outpatient basis for treatment

of a nonservice-connected condition. The Veterans Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act of

1999 (P.L. 106-117) authorized the VA to increase the medication co-payment amount and

establish annual caps on the total amount paid, to eliminate financial hardship for veterans

51

U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies

Appropriations Bill, 2008, report to accompany H.R. 2642, 110th Congress, 1st session, H.Rept. 110-186, p.14.

52

The following veterans are exempt from paying copayments: veterans receiving a pension for a nonserviceconnected disability from the VA; veterans with incomes below $10,929 (if no dependents) and $14,313 (with one

dependent plus $1,866 for each additional dependent); veterans receiving care for conditions such as Agent Orange or

Military Sexual Trauma, and combat veterans within two years of discharge; and veterans who are former POWs.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Řřȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

enrolled in Priority Groups 2-6.53 When veterans reach the annual cap, they continue to receive

medications without making a co-payment.

On November 15, 2005, the VHA issued a directive stating that effective January 1, 2006, the

medication co-payment will be increased to $8 for each 30-day supply of medication furnished on

an outpatient basis for treatment of a nonservice-connected condition, and that the annual cap for

veterans enrolled in Priority Groups 2-6 will be $960.54 There is no cap for veterans in Priority

Groups 7 and 8 (see Appendixes B and C). The VA estimates that if the current proposal to raise

the co-payment were enacted, it would contribute $311 million to the Treasury in FY2008 and

will increase revenue by $1.6 billion over five years. The MILCON-VA Appropriation Act (P.L.

110-161) does not include any bill language that would give the VA the authority to increase copayments.

–™ŠŒȱ˜ȱŽŽȱ›˜™˜œŠ•œȱ

According to VA estimates, of the 5.8 million unique patients that it expects to see in 2008,

111,000 may choose not to use the system if an enrollment fee is imposed and the pharmacy

copays are increased.

‘’›ȬŠ›¢ȱœŽȱ˜ȱ’›œȬŠ›¢ȱŽ‹ȱ

The Administration is requesting that Congress amend the VA’s statutory authority by eliminating

the practice of reducing first-party co-payment debts with third-party health-insurance

collections. The VA asserts that this proposal would align the VA with the DOD health-care

system for military retirees and with the private sector.

With the enactment of P.L. 99-272 in 1986, Congress authorized the VA to collect payments from

third-party health insurers for the treatment of veterans with nonservice-connected disabilities; it

also established co-payments from veterans for this care.55 Under current law, the VA is

authorized to collect from third-party health insurers to offset the cost of medical care furnished

to a veteran for the treatment of a nonservice-connected condition.56 If the VA treats an insured

veteran for a nonservice-connected disability, and the veteran is also determined by the VA to

have co-payment responsibilities, the VA will apply the payment collected from the insurer to

satisfy the veteran’s co-payment debt related to that treatment.

Under the current co-payment billing process, in cases where the cost of a veteran’s medical care

for a nonservice-connected condition appears to qualify for billing under reimbursable insurance

and co-payment, the VA medical facilities sends the bill to the insurance provider. The veteran’s

co-payment obligation is placed on hold for 90 days pending payment from the third-party payer.

53

This law allowed the VA to increase the copayment amount for each 30-day or less supply of medication provided on

an outpatient basis (other than medication administered during treatment) for treatment of a nonservice-connected

condition. Accordingly, the VA increased the co-payment amount from $2 to $7. The medication co-payment charge

for each subsequent calendar year after 2002 is established by using the prescription drug component of the Medical

Consumer Price Index. When an increase occurs, the co-payment increases in whole dollar amounts. The amount of the

annual cap increases $120 for each $1 increase in the co-payment amount.

54

VHA Directive 2005-052, Implementation of Medication Copayment Changes, November 15, 2005.

55

Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, 100 Stat. 372, 373, 383.

56

38 U.S.C. §1729; 38 U.S.C. §1710; and 38 U.S.C. 1722A.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŘŚȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

If no payment is received from the third-party payer within 90 days, a bill is sent to the veteran

for the full co-payment amount. However, when insurers reimburse the VA after the 90-day

period, the VA must absorb the cost of additional staff time for processing a refund if the veteran

has already paid the bill. On all insurance policies, the entire amount of the claim payment is

applied first to the co-payment. The veteran is then billed only for the portion of the co-payment

not covered by the insurance reimbursement and the portion of the co-payment for services not

covered by the veteran’s insurance plan (see Figure 2).

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Řśȱ

ȱ

Figure 2. Present Co-payment Process

Source:

ȬŘŜȱ

Department of Veterans Affairs.

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

Under the Administration’s proposal, veterans receiving medical care services for treatment of

non-service-connected disabilities will receive a bill for their entire co-payment, and the copayment will not be reduced by collection recoveries from third-party health plans. This proposal

would apply to all veterans who make co-payments.

According to VA estimates, this proposal will increase revenue by $44 million in FY2008 and

$217 million over five years. The House and Senate Appropriations Committees have not

addressed this issue because it is an issue in the purview of the authorizing committees.

žž›Žȱ˜œȱ˜ȱŽŽ›Š—œȂȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱŠ›Žȱ

On February 15, 2007, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) testified that “assuming no major

changes in policy and no major changes in enrollment trends ... that [VHA] medical spending

would increase from $35 billion in 2007 to $66 billion in 2025, or 88 percent cumulative real

growth. That increase implies annual real growth that averages 3.6 percent over the period.”57 The

House and Senate Appropriations Committees have expressed concern that the President’s budget

has not accurately projected the future cost of health care for veterans from FY2008-FY2012.

Furthermore, the House Appropriations Committee expressed doubt in the actuarial model

currently used to project health-care demand for Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and

Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) veterans. The House Appropriations Committee has included a

general provision in H.R. 2642 directing the CBO to submit a report projecting the annual

funding level necessary for the VHA to continue providing health care for veterans from FY2009

through FY2012.

57

Statement of Allison Percy, Principal Analyst, on the Future Medical Spending by the Department of Veterans

Affairs, before the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and

Related Agencies, February 15, 2007.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Řŝȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

™™Ž—’¡ȱǯ ›’˜›’¢ȱ ›˜ž™œȱŠ—ȱ‘Ž’›ȱ•’’‹’•’¢ȱ

›’Ž›’Šȱ

Priority Group 1

Veterans with service-connected disabilities rated 50% or more disabling

Priority Group 2

Veterans with service-connected disabilities rated 30% or 40% disabling

Priority Group 3

Veterans who are former POWs

Veterans awarded the Purple Heart

Veterans whose discharge was for a disability that was incurred or aggravated in the line of duty

Veterans with service-connected disabilities rated 10% or 20% disabling

Veterans awarded special eligibility classification under Title 38, U.S. C., Section 1151, “benefits for individuals disabled

by treatment or vocational rehabilitation”

Priority Group 4

Veterans who are receiving aid and attendance or housebound benefits

Veterans who have been determined by the VA to be catastrophically disabled

Priority Group 5

Nonservice-connected disabled veterans and noncompensable service-connected veterans rated 0% disabled whose

annual income and net worth are below the established VA Means Test thresholds

Veterans receiving VA pension benefits

Veterans eligible for Medicaid benefits

Priority Group 6

Compensable 0% service-connected disabled veterans

World War I veterans

Mexican Border War veterans

Veterans solely seeking care for disorders associated with

—exposure to herbicides while serving in Vietnam; or

—ionizing radiation during atmospheric testing or during the occupation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; or

—for disorders associated with service in the Gulf War; or

—for any illness associated with service in combat in a war after the Gulf War or during a period of hostility after

November 11, 1998.

Priority Group 7

Veterans who agree to pay specified co-payments who have income and/or net worth above the VA Means Test

threshold and income below the HUD geographic index

—Subpriority a: Noncompensable 0% service-connected disabled veterans who were enrolled in the VA Health Care

System on a specified date and who have remained enrolled since that date

—Subpriority c: Nonservice-connected disabled veterans who were enrolled in the VA Health Care System on a

specified date and who have remained enrolled since that date.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

ŘŞȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

—Subpriority e: Noncompensable 0% service-connected disabled veterans not included in Subpriority a above

—Subpriority g: Nonservice-connected disabled veterans not included in Subpriority c above

Priority Group 8

Veterans who agree to pay specified co-payments with income and/or net worth above the VA Means Test threshold

and the HUD geographic index

—Subpriority a: Noncompensable 0% service-connected disabled veterans enrolled as of January 16, 2003 and who

have remained enrolled since that date

—Subpriority c: Nonservice-connected disabled veterans enrolled as of January 16, 2003 and who have remained

enrolled since that date

—Subpriority e: Noncompensable 0% service-connected disabled veterans applying for enrollment after January 16,

2003

Department of Veterans Affairs.

Note: Service-connected disability means with respect to disability, that such disability was incurred or

aggravated in the line of duty in the active military, naval, or air service.

Source:

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Řşȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

™™Ž—’¡ȱǯ ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŠ¢–Ž—œȱ˜›ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȬŠ›Žȱ

Ž›Ÿ’ŒŽœǰȱ‹¢ȱ›’˜›’¢ȱ ›˜ž™ȱ

Copayments

Inpatient

Geographic

VA

Means Test Means OutCopayment

Test patient

Priority Group 1

Priority Groups 2,

3,b 4c

No

No

No

No

Medicationa

Insurance

Billing

Humanitarian

Emergency

Billing

No

No

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

No

No

Yes, but only for veterans

with less than 50% service

connected disability and

medication is for nonserviceconnected condition. Former

POWs are exempt from all

medications co-payments

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

No

Priority Group 5

No

No

No

Yes

Priority Group 6

(WWI, and 0%

service-connected

compensable)

No

No

No

Yes

Priority Group 6

(Veterans receiving

care for exposure

or experience)d

No

Nod

Nod

Nod

Priority Group 7a

Yes

No

Yes

Yes, but only if care was for

nonservice-connected

condition

Priority Group 7c

Yes

No

Yes

Yes, but only if care was for

nonservice-connected

condition

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

No

No

No

No

No

řŖȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

Copayments

Inpatient

Geographic

VA

Means Test Means OutCopayment

Test patient

Medicationa

Priority Group 8a

No

Yes

Yes

Yes, but only if care was for

nonservice-connected

condition

Priority Group 8c

No

Yes

Yes

Yes, but only if care was for

nonservice-connected

condition

Insurance

Billing

Humanitarian

Emergency

Billing

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

Yes, but only if

care was for

nonserviceconnected

condition

No

No

Table prepared by CRS based on information from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Notes: Priority Group 7a and 7c veterans have income above the VA Means Test threshold but below the

Geographic Means Test threshold and are responsible for 20% of the inpatient co-payment and 20% of the

inpatient per diem co-payment. The geographic means test co-payment reduction does not apply to outpatient

and medication co-payment, and veterans will be assessed the full applicable co-payment charges. Note that

reduced inpatient co-payments can apply to veterans in Priority Groups 4 and 6 based on the income of the

veteran.

Priority Group 8a and 8c veterans have income above the VA Means Test threshold and above the Geographic

Means Test threshold. Veterans enrolled in this priority group are responsible for the full inpatient co-payment

and the inpatient per diem co-payment for care of their nonservice-connected conditions. Veterans in this

priority group are also responsible for outpatient and medication co-payments for care of their nonserviceconnected conditions.

a. An annual medication co-payment cap has been established for veterans enrolled in Priority Groups 2-6.

Medication will continue to be dispensed after co-payment cap is met. An annual co-payment cap has not

been established for veterans enrolled in Priority Groups 7 or 8.

b. Veterans in receipt of a Purple Heart are in Priority Group 3. This change occurred with the enactment of

the Veterans Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act (P.L. 106-117) on Nov. 30, 1999.

c. Priority Group 7 veterans who are determined to be catastrophically disabled and who are placed in

Priority Group 4 for treatment are still subject to the co-payment requirements as a Priority Group 7

veteran.

d. Priority Group 6—veterans claiming exposure to Agent Orange; veterans claiming exposure to

environmental contaminants; veterans exposed to Ionizing Radiation; combat veterans within two years of

discharge from the military; veterans who participated in Project 112/SHAD; veterans claiming military

sexual trauma; and veterans with head and neck cancer who received nasopharyngeal radium treatment

while in the military are subject to co-payments when their treatment or medication is not related to their

exposure or experience. The initial registry examination and follow-up visits to receive results of the

examination are not billed to the health insurance carrier and are not subject to co-payments. However,

care provided that is not related to exposure, if it is nonservice-connected, will be billed to the insurance

carrier and co-payments can apply.

Source:

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

řŗȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂ Ž’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ȱ

ȱ

™™Ž—’¡ȱǯ ’—Š—Œ’Š•ȱ —Œ˜–Žȱ‘›Žœ‘˜•œȱ˜›ȱȱ

ŽŠ•‘ȬŠ›ŽȱŽ—Ž’œȱ

Veterans with—

Free VA prescriptions and travel

benefits for veterans with incomes of—

Free VA inpatient and outpatient

care for veterans with incomes of—

$10,929 or less

$14,313 or less

$16,179 or less

$18,045 or less

$19,911 or less

$27,790 or less

$33,350 or less

$35,216 or less

$37,082 or less

$38,948 or less

$1,866

$1,866

No dependents

1 dependent

2 dependents

3 dependents

4 dependents

For each additional

dependent, add:

Source: Department of Veterans Affairs.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

řŘȱ

ȱ

™™Ž—’¡ȱǯ  ȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ˜›ȱŘŖŖśȱŠ—ȱŘŖŖŜȱ

( $ in thousands)

Program

Medical services

Supplemental appropriations (P.L.

108-324)

Supplemental appropriations

Emergency appropriations

Emergency appropriations-Gulf

Coast Hurricanes (P.L. 109-148)

Emergency appropriations-Avian

Flu Pandemic (P.L. 109-148)

Subtotal medical services

FY2005

request

FY2005

House

FY2005

Senate

FY2005

enacted

FY2006

request

FY2006

House

FY2006

Senate

FY2006

enacted

—

$19,498,600

$19,498,600a

$19,316,995

$19,995,141

$20,995,141

$21,331,011

$21,322,141

$38,283

975,000b

—

—

975,000c

—

—

1,500,000d

—

38,283

1,500,000e

—

—

—

1,977,000f

—

—

—

—

—

1,977,000g

—

—

1,225,000h

—

—

—

—

198,265

—

—

198,265

—

—

—

—

27,000

—

—

27,000

1,013,283

20,473,600

20,998,600

20,855,278

22,197,406

20,995,141

23,308,011

22,772,406

Medical administration

Supplemental appropriations (P.L.

108-324)

—

4,705,000

4,705,000

4,667,360

4,517,874

4,134,874

2,858,442

2,858,442

1,940

—

—

1,940

—

—

—

—

Subtotal medical

administration

1,940

4,705,000

4,705,000

4,669,300

4,517,874

4,134,874

2,858,442

2,858,442

Medical facilities

Supplemental appropriations (P.L.

108-324)

—

3,745,000

3,745,000

3,715,040

3,297,669

3,297,669

3,297,669

3,297,669

46,909

—

—

46,909

—

—

—

—

Subtotal medical facilities

46,909

3,745,000

3,745,000

3,761,949

3,297,669

3,297,669

3,297,669

3,297,669

Medical and prosthetic research

Information technology

Medical care

384,770

—

26,748,600

384,770

—

—

405,593

—

—

402,348

—

—

393,000

—

—

393,000

—

—

412,000

1,456,821

—

412,000

—

—

28,195,502

28,308,370

28,854,193

29,688,875

30,405,949

28,820,684

31,332,943

29,340,517

i

Total VHA appropriations

(without collections)

Ȭřřȱ

ȱ

Program

FY2005

request

FY2005

House

FY2005

Senate

FY2005

enacted

FY2006

request

FY2006

House

FY2006

Senate

FY2006

enacted

Medical care cost collection

(MCCF)j

2,002,000

2,002,000

2,002,000

1,985,984

2,170,000

2,170,000

2,170,000

2,170,000

Total: VHA (appropriations

and collections)

$30,197,502 $31,310,370 $30,856,193 $31,674,859 $32,575,949 $30,990,684 $33,502,943 $31,510,517

Source: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on H.Rept. 108-674; S.Rept. 108-353; H.Rept. 109-95; S.Rept. 109-105; H.Rept. 109-305; H.Rept.

109-359; and House Appropriations Committee data.

Notes: Appropriation amounts for FY2005 adjusted to account for the 0.8% across-the-board reduction in most discretionary accounts as called for in Division J, Section

122 (a)(1) of P.L. 108-447. Supplemental appropriations for FY2005 are not subject to the 0.8% across-the-board reductions. Appropriation amounts for FY2006 are not

subject to any cross-the-board reductions as stipulated in Division B, Title III, Section 3801(c)(2) of P.L. 109-148.

a. This amount includes $1.2 billion designated as an emergency requirement.

b. On June 30, 2005, the Administration requested an additional $975 million for medical services for FY2005.

c. On June 30, 2005, the House passed H.R. 3130.

d. On June 29, 2005, the Senate passed an amendment to H.R. 2361, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill, 2006 to add

$1.5 billion in emergency funds for medical services.

e. On August 2, 2005, the FY2006 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill (H.R. 2361, P.L. 109-54) was signed into law.

f. On July 14, 2005, the Administration requested an additional $1.977 billion for medical services for FY2006.

g. On July 21, 2005, the Senate Committee on Appropriations reported H.R. 2528 favorably out of committee (S.Rept. 109-105) and designated this amount as an

emergency appropriation.

h. On November 18, 2005, the House and Senate adopted the conference report (H.Rept. 109-305) to accompany H.R. 2528 and designated this amount as an

emergency appropriation.

i. This amount includes funding for medical services, medical administration, and medical facilities.

j. Medical Care Cost Collection Fund (MCCF) receipts are restored to the VHA as an indefinite budget authority equal to the revenue collected, estimated to be $1.985

billion in FY2005, $2.17 billion in FY2006, and $2.33 billion in FY2007.

ȬřŚȱ

ȱ

ŽŽ›Š—œȂȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱŠ›ŽDZȱŘŖŖŞȱ™™›˜™›’Š’˜—œȱ

ž‘˜›ȱ˜—ŠŒȱ —˜›–Š’˜—ȱ

(name redacted)

Analyst in Veterans Policy

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov, 7-....

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

řśȱ

EveryCRSReport.com

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the

Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on

issues that may come before Congress.

EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to all Congressional staff. The

reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to

the public.

Prior to our republication, we redacted names, phone numbers and email addresses of analysts

who produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentionally made

any other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.

CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in

the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without

permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a

third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or

otherwise use copyrighted material.

Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public

understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in

connection with CRS' institutional role.

EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim

copyright on any CRS report we have republished.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Veterans’ Medical Care: FY2008 Appropriations · RL34063 | Frix