Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD) Appropriations for FY2025

Congressional research reportMay 7, 2026

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

Transportation, Housing and Urban

Development, and Related Agencies (THUD)

Appropriations for FY2025

Updated May 7, 2026

Congressional Research Service

https://crsreports.congress.gov

R48253

SUMMARY

Transportation, Housing and Urban

Development, and Related Agencies (THUD)

Appropriations for FY2025

The House and the Senate Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related

Agencies (THUD) Appropriations Subcommittees are charged with providing annual

appropriations for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Department of

Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and certain related agencies.

R48253

May 7, 2026

Maggie McCarty,

Coordinator

Specialist in Housing Policy

Jennifer J. Marshall

Analyst in Transportation

Policy

The FY2025 appropriations process began with the release of the President’s budget request to

Congress on March 11, 2024. For the agencies that comprise the THUD budget, it proposed the

following:

•

For DOT, $106.4 billion in total funding (the same as FY2024), including $25.5 billion in discretionary

funding (-5.6% relative to FY2024) and $80.9 billion in mandatory funding (+2% relative to FY2024).

•

For HUD, $64.3 billion in discretionary funding (-8.3% relative to FY2024), which includes $10.4 billion

in emergency funding for regular program operations.

•

For related agencies, $462 million in discretionary funding (+8.1% relative to FY2024).

On July 10, the House Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2025 THUD appropriations bill

(H.R. 9028; H.Rept. 118-584), following subcommittee markup on June 27. It included the following:

•

For DOT, $106.7 billion in total funding (nearly even with FY2024), including $25.1 billion in

discretionary funding (-6.9% relative to FY2024) and $81.5 billion in mandatory funding (+2.7% relative to

FY2024).

•

For HUD, $64.8 billion (-7.5% relative to FY2024 when including emergency funding for regular program

operations provided in FY2024; +4.4% when excluding that emergency funding).

•

For related agencies, $442 million (+3.3% relative to FY2024).

Forgoing initial subcommittee markup, the Senate Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2025

THUD appropriations bill (S. 4796; S.Rept. 118-199) on July 25. It included the following:

•

For DOT, $110.1 billion in total funding (+3.5% relative to FY2024), including $28.5 billion in

discretionary funding (+5.6% relative to FY2024) and $81.6 billion in mandatory funding (+2.8% relative

to FY2024).

•

For HUD, $58.8 billion in regular appropriations and $11 billion in emergency designated funding for

regular program operations, for a combined total of $69.8 billion (<1% decrease relative to FY2024).

•

For related agencies, $454 million (+6.1% relative to FY2024).

On September 26, 2024 the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, was signed into law (H.R. 9747; P.L. 11883). Division A was a continuing resolution that maintained funding for federal agencies, including those typically funded in

the THUD appropriations legislation, at FY2024 levels through December 20, 2024, with some anomalies. That CR was

extended through March 14, 2025, by Division A of P.L. 118-83. Before the expiration of the second CR, Congress approved

and the President signed a full-year CR (P.L. 119-4), funding most THUD accounts in FY2025 at their FY2024 levels, with

some exceptions, also referred to as anomalies.

Congressional Research Service

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

Contents

About the THUD Bill ...................................................................................................................... 1

Overview of the FY2025 Appropriations Process ........................................................................... 2

President’s Budget..................................................................................................................... 2

House Action ............................................................................................................................. 2

Senate Action ............................................................................................................................ 3

Enactment of a Full-Year Continuing Resolution ..................................................................... 3

Department of Transportation.......................................................................................................... 4

Selected FY2025 DOT Appropriations Topics.......................................................................... 9

National Infrastructure Investments (Mega/RAISE Grants) ............................................... 9

Federal Railroad Administration ....................................................................................... 10

Federal Transit Administration ......................................................................................... 10

Maritime Administration .................................................................................................... 11

Earmarks ............................................................................................................................ 11

Sources of FY2024 Enacted Budget Authority ................................................................. 12

Department of Housing and Urban Development ......................................................................... 13

Overview ................................................................................................................................. 13

Selected FY2025 HUD Appropriations Topics ....................................................................... 17

Emergency-Designated Funding for Rental Assistance Renewals ................................... 17

House-Proposed Cut to the HOME Investment Partnerships Program............................. 18

General Provisions ............................................................................................................ 19

THUD Related Agencies ............................................................................................................... 21

Figures

Figure 1. Distribution of THUD Funding by Title .......................................................................... 1

Figure 2. Rental Assistance Renewal Funding .............................................................................. 18

Tables

Table 1. THUD Appropriations by Bill Title, FY2024-FY2025...................................................... 3

Table 2. Department of Transportation, FY2024-FY2025 Detailed Appropriations ....................... 5

Table 3. Department of Transportation, FY2024-FY2025 Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending ............................................................................. 12

Table 4. Department of Transportation Budget Authority by Source, FY2024 ............................. 13

Table 5. Department of Housing and Urban Development,

FY2024-FY2025 Detailed Appropriations ................................................................................. 14

Table 6. THUD Related Agencies, FY2024-FY2025 Detailed Appropriations ............................ 22

Table A-1. FY2025 THUD 302(b) Suballocations, in Context ..................................................... 24

Congressional Research Service

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

Appendixes

Appendix. Overview of the FY2025 Budget Process.................................................................... 23

Contacts

Author Information........................................................................................................................ 25

Congressional Research Service

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

T

he House and the Senate Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related

Agencies (THUD) Appropriations Subcommittees are charged with providing annual

appropriations for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Department of

Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and certain related agencies.

This report describes action on FY2025 annual appropriations for THUD, including detailed

tables for each major agency and a brief overview of selected issues.

About the THUD Bill

The THUD bill funds two federal departments—DOT and HUD—and several smaller related

agencies. Of the 12 regular appropriations bills, THUD is typically the fourth largest in terms of

discretionary funding and it typically contains the largest number of Community Project Funding

or Congressionally Directed Spending projects (earmarks).1

As shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, the distribution of funding within the THUD bill differs

depending on the inclusion or exclusion of mandatory funding associated with the bill. Including

both mandatory and discretionary funding, DOT’s budget is larger than that of HUD’s and the

related agencies make up a small share of total funding. Conversely, when looking only at net

discretionary budget authority—the funding that counts for congressional scorekeeping purposes,

which accounts for savings from offsets and rescissions but excludes mandatory funding—HUD’s

share is larger than DOT’s share.

Figure 1. Distribution of THUD Funding by Title

FY2024 Enacted

Sources: Comparative Statement of New Budget (Obligational) Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 118584, as well as congressional budget justifications.

Note: Excludes emergency funding, such as emergency funding provided for regular program operations.

1 For more information, see CRS Report RS22866, Earmark Disclosure Rules in the House: Member and Committee

Requirements; and CRS Report RS22867, Earmark Disclosure Rules in the Senate: Member and Committee

Requirements.

Congressional Research Service

1

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

Overview of the FY2025 Appropriations Process

Appropriations for DOT, HUD, and the related agencies typically funded in the THUD bill

happen in the context of the broader annual congressional appropriations process. That process

generally begins with the submission of the President’s budget request, followed by adoption of

congressional spending limits (generally, in a budget resolution) that set the overall level of

spending for that fiscal year’s appropriations bills. From there, the subcommittees of the House

and the Senate Appropriations Committees generally begin action on each of the 12

appropriations bills based on their subcommittee allocations (referred to as 302(b) allocations).

(For more information, see the Appendix.)

While each bill reported out of the House and the Senate Appropriations Committees may receive

floor consideration individually, in recent years it has been more common for bills to be

considered in combination with one another in consolidated or omnibus appropriations acts.

The following sections summarize FY2025 appropriations actions; Table 1 tracks FY2025 THUD

funding at the bill title level, compared to FY2024.

President’s Budget

The President’s budget request for FY2025 was released on March 11, 2024. For the agencies that

comprise the THUD budget, it proposed the following:

•

•

•

For DOT, $106.4 billion in total funding for FY2025 (the same as FY2024),

including $25.5 billion in discretionary funding (-5.6% relative to FY2024) and

$80.9 billion in mandatory funding (+2% relative to FY2024).

For HUD, $64.3 billion in discretionary funding (-8.3% relative to FY2024)

including $10.4 billion in emergency funding for regular program operations.

• In terms of gross appropriations—not accounting for savings from offsets

and rescissions—the President’s budget requested a decrease of 3.9%, or just

under $3 billion. Much of this decrease is attributable to the President’s

budget including no new funding for Economic Development Initiatives;

they received nearly $3.3 billion in FY2024, all of which was for earmarks.

For related agencies, $462 million (+8.1% relative to FY2024).

House Action

On July 10, the House Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2025

THUD appropriations bill (H.R. 9028; H.Rept. 118-584), following subcommittee markup on

June 27. It included the following:

•

•

•

For DOT, $106.7 billion in total funding for FY2025 (nearly the same as

FY2024), including $25.1 billion in discretionary funding (-6.9% relative to

FY2024) and $81.5 billion in mandatory funding (+2.7% relative to FY2024).

For HUD, $64.8 billion (-7.5% relative to FY2024 when including emergency

funding for regular program operations provided in FY2024; +4.4% when

excluding that emergency funding).

For related agencies, $442 million (+3.3% relative to FY2024).

Congressional Research Service

2

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

Senate Action

Forgoing subcommittee consideration, the Senate Appropriations Committee marked up and

ordered reported its FY2025 THUD appropriations bill (S. 4796; S.Rept. 118-199) on July 25. It

included the following:

•

For DOT, $110.1 billion in total funding for FY2025 (+3.5% relative to FY2024),

including $28.5 billion in discretionary funding (+5.6% relative to FY2024) and

$81.6 billion in mandatory funding (+2.7% relative to FY2024).

For HUD, $58.8 billion in regular appropriations and $11 billion in emergency

designated funding for regular program operations, for a combined total of $69.8

billion (<1% decrease relative to FY2024).

For related agencies, $454 million (+6.1% relative to FY2024).

•

•

Enactment of a Full-Year Continuing Resolution

Following enactment of two short-term continuing resolutions, on March 15, 2025, the President

signed into law H.R. 1968—the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025—

as P.L. 119-4. Division A of the act—the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2025—

provided continuing appropriations for all 12 regular appropriations acts through the end of

FY2025. While most accounts were funded at their FY2024 levels under the terms of the

continuing resolution (CR), some exceptions—referred to as anomalies—relevant for THUD

were adopted, including:

•

•

Elimination of all earmark funding, including for HUD and DOT, in FY2025.

Increased obligation limits for DOT’s Highway Trust Fund and Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) Grants-in-Aid for Airports.

Increased funding for DOT’s Payments to Air Carriers and FAA Operations

accounts.

Increased funding for HUD’s rental assistance program accounts.

Increased funding for the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

•

•

•

For more information about the FY2025 CR, see CRS Report R48517, Section-by-Section

Summary of the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2025 (Division A of P.L. 119-4).

Table 1. THUD Appropriations by Bill Title, FY2024-FY2025

(dollars in millions)

FY2024

Enacted

Title I: DOT

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2025

Enacted

106,365

106,413

106,671

110,080

106,785

Discretionary

26,987

25,468

25,132

28,485

25,246

Mandatory

79,378

80,945

81,539

81,595

81,539

62,069a

53,887b

64,827

58,768

60,690a

428

462

442

454

433

168,862

160,763

171,939

169,302

167,908

89,484

79,818

90,400

87,707

86,369

Title II: HUD

Title III: Related Agencies

Total

Total Discretionary

Congressional Research Service

3

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2025

Enacted

Total Mandatory

79,378

80,945

81,539

81,595

81,539

Emergency Appropriations for

Regular Program Operations

8,000

10,371

0

11,030

8,000

Emergency Disaster Funding

0

—c

0

0

20,125d

Sources: FY2024 Enacted, FY2025 President’s Request, and FY2025 House figures are taken from the

Comparative Statement of New Budget (Obligational) Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 118-584, as well as

congressional budget justifications. FY2025 Senate figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New

(Obligational) Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 118-199. FY2025 enacted figures are taken from the

funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in the January 22, 2026 Congressional Record (pp.

H1888-H1909). Some figures have been adjusted for comparability.

Notes: Values may not sum to totals or exactly match source materials because of rounding. Amounts noted as

“emergency” are excluded when calculating total funds countable toward 302(b) allocations.

a. Excludes $8 billion in appropriations for rental assistance programs designated as emergency spending in the

bill, shown under “Emergency Appropriations” later in this table.

b. Excludes $10.4 billion in appropriations for rental assistance programs the President’s budget requested be

designated as emergency spending, shown under “Emergency Appropriations” later in this table.

c. On June 28, 2024, the President submitted a supplemental request to Congress including $700 million for

HUD to provide assistance for communities affected by disasters in 2023 and $3.1 billion for DOT to

address emergencies including the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse.

d. Division B of P.L. 118-158 (the law that contained in Division A the second FY2025 continuing resolution)

provided $8 billion for FHWA’s Emergency Relief Program, which funds the repair or replacement of

disaster-damaged highway infrastructure such as the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Maryland and $12 billion in

emergency funding for HUD Community Development Fund for assistance in response to natural disasters

that occurred in 2023 or 2024.

Department of Transportation

Among its many responsibilities, DOT operates the nation’s air traffic control system; regulates

aviation, commercial trucking, and motor vehicle safety; and provides grants to support aviation,

highway, transit, and passenger rail infrastructure as well as highway, maritime, and pipeline

safety.

The majority of DOT’s annual funding is established by two periodic authorization acts, one for

surface transportation programs and one for aviation programs. Most of the funding for the

programs in those acts is drawn from the DOT Highway Trust Fund (HTF) and the Aviation and

Airways Trust Fund (AATF), respectively. HTF revenues come largely from fuel taxes and

increasingly from transfers from the general fund of the Treasury. AATF revenues come largely

from taxes on passenger tickets and aviation fuel and some general fund money.

Most of the funding drawn from the HTF, and a portion of the funding drawn from the AATF, is

in the form of contract authority, a type of budget authority that is considered mandatory (rather

than discretionary). The THUD bill includes obligation limitations on this mandatory budget

authority; it does not count against the THUD bill’s 302(b) discretionary suballocation or the

statutory discretionary spending limits under the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (FRA; P.L.

118-5). DOT’s discretionary appropriation for FY2024 was $27 billion, and the agency also

received $79 billion in new mandatory funding from its trust funds, for a total of $106 billion in

new budget authority (roughly equal to FY2023). DOT also received an additional $37 billion in

advance appropriations for FY2024 from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L.

Congressional Research Service

4

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

117-58), for a grand total of $143 billion in newly available funding for FY2024 (about the same

as FY2023).

Table 2 provides detailed appropriations information for DOT accounts and selected subaccounts,

comparing FY2024 enacted to FY2025 requested, proposed, and enacted.

Components of DOT Funding

DOT’s budget is made up of a combination of mandatory funding largely provided outside the annual appropriations

acts via authorizing statutes and discretionary budget authority largely provided in the annual THUD appropriations

acts.

DOT’s mandatory funding includes contract authority, which is a special type of budget authority linked to trust

funds that is authorized for obligation via an authorization act (such as surface transportation acts) that does not

require further congressional action for DOT to incur obligations. This type of budget authority is considered to

be mandatory spending. Congress typically sets a limitation on obligations of this mandatory budget authority

during the annual appropriations process.

DOT uses two main trust funds: the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) and the Airport and Airways Trust Fund (AATF).

The majority of programs that are administered by the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit

Administration, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

are funded via the HTF. Some programs administered by the Federal Aviation Administration are funded by the

AATF. Some of the funding from the AATF is disbursed as contract authority (mandatory), but the majority relies

on an appropriation (discretionary).

Additionally, DOT received multi-year, supplemental, emergency-designated advance appropriations under

Division J of the IIJA for each of FY2022-FY2026.

The cost of the new discretionary budget authority provided via annual appropriations acts—as determined by the

Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO’s) scorekeeping process—may be offset, to some degree, by savings derived

from collections from user fees and rescissions of prior-year appropriations. Deducting the savings from fees and

rescissions from the gross discretionary budget authority provided to DOT results in net discretionary budget authority.

Generally, gross discretionary budget authority, along with mandatory funding available in a fiscal year, is the most

useful measure of the new resources being provided for DOT’s programs and activities, whereas net discretionary

budget authority is used for budget enforcement purposes and measuring against 302(b) allocations.

Any funding designated as an emergency requirement provided in the regular annual appropriations acts or in

supplemental spending bills is generally excluded from totals for purposes of budget enforcement.

Table 2. Department of Transportation, FY2024-FY2025 Detailed Appropriations

(dollars in millions)

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

Office of the Secretary (OST)

1,067

870

807

1,426

1,168

Salaries and Expenses

191

210

199

210

191

Research and Technology

49

62

50

57

49

National Infrastructure Investments

345

0

0

550

345

Transportation Infrastructure

Finance and Innovation Act

Repurposing (non-add)

—

-800

0

0

—

National Infrastructure Investments

Transfer (non-add)

—

800

0

0

—

Thriving Communities Initiative

—

25

0

0

—

Administrations and Accounts

FY2025

Enacted

Appropriations

Congressional Research Service

5

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

National Surface Transportation and

Innovation Finance Bureau

10

11

11

11

10

Rural and Tribal Infrastructure

Advancement

25

0

0

25

25

Railroad Rehabilitation and

Improvement Program (negative

subsidy)

-3

—

—

—

—

Financial Management Capital

5

5

5

5

5

Cyber Security Initiatives

49

75

75

75

49

Office of Civil Rights

18

22

18

18

18

Transportation Planning, Research,

and Development

24

25

21

46

21**

Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed

Spending (non-add)

3

0

0

11

0**

Working Capital Fund (non-add)

522

496

496

496

522

Small and Disadvantaged Business

Utilization and Outreach

5

7

6

7

5

Payments to Air Carriers (Essential

Air Service)

349

423

423

423

450**

Essential Air Service (Overflight

Fees) (non-add)

154

164

164

164

162b

Electric Vehicle Fleet

—

5

0

0

—

16,733

17,453

17,657

18,015

16,989

Operations

12,730

13,603

13,588

13,603

13,483**

Facilities & Equipment

3,191

3,600

3,549

3,600

3,176**

Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed

Spending (non-add)

15

0

0

0

0**

Research, Engineering, and

Development (Airport and Airways

Trust Fund)

280

250

260

290

280

Airport Discretionary Grants

532

0

261

521

50**

482

0

258

221

0**

Federal Highway Administration

(FHWA)

2,225

0

1,490

1,117

341

Highway Infrastructure Programs

2,225

0

1,490

1,117

341**

1,884

0

1,085

568

0**

Administrations and Accounts

Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA)

Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed

Spending (non-add)

Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed

Spending (non-add)

Congressional Research Service

FY2025

Enacted

6

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration (NHTSA)

223

248

235

248

223

Operations and Research

223

248

235

248

223

Federal Railroad Administration

(FRA)

3,024

3,200

2,758

3,461

2,925

Safety and Operations

268

294

288

293

268

Railroad Research and

Development

54

52

46

55

54

Federal-State Partnership for

Intercity Passenger Rail

75

100

0

100

75

Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and

Safety Improvements

199

250

299

376

100**

Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed

Spending (non-add)

99

0

39

76

0**

2,428

2,504

2,125

2,638

2,428

Northeast Corridor

1,141

1,200

1,002

1,021

1,141

National Network

1,286

1,304

1,123

1,617

1,286

Federal Transit Administration

(FTA)

2,615

2,524

1,028

2,766

2,408

Transit Infrastructure Grants

252

0

116

346

46**

207

0

116

66

0**

8

8

8

8

0**

2,205

2,366

755

2,262

2,205

Grants to Washington Metropolitan

Area Transit Authority

150

150

150

150

150

Great Lakes Saint Lawrence

Seaway Development Corporation

(GLSLSDC)

40

41

41

41

40

Operations and Maintenance

40

41

41

41

40

Maritime Administration (MARAD)

982

860

919

1,143

900

Maritime Security Program

318

318

318

318

318

Cable Security Fleet

10

0

10

10

10

Tanker Security Program

60

60

120

120

60

Operations and Training

268

285

262

285

268

State Maritime Academy

Operations

126

87

118

178

126

Assistance to Small Shipyards

9

20

9

20

9

Ship Disposal

6

6

6

6

6

Administrations and Accounts

Amtrak Grants

Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed

Spending (non-add)

Technical Assistance and Training

Capital Investment Grants

Congressional Research Service

FY2025

Enacted

7

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

Maritime Guaranteed Loan Program

54

4

4

5

54

Port Infrastructure Development

Program

121

80

72

200

50**

71

0

22

0

0**

National Defense Reserve Fleet

12

—

—

—

0**

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials

Safety Administration (PHMSA)

324

354

338

354

324

Operational Expenses

32

33

32

33

32

Hazardous Material Safety

75

87

81

87

75

Pipeline Safety

218

235

224

235

218

Oil Spill Liability Fund

30

31

31

31

30

Pipeline Safety Fund

181

196

186

196

181

Liquefied Natural Gas Siting

Account

*

*

*

*

*

Underground Natural Gas

Storage Facility Safety Account

7

7

7

7

7

Office of Inspector General

117

122

122

119

117

Salaries and Expenses

117

122

122

119

117

27,162

25,672

25,395

28,689

25,435

-175

—

-70

—

0**

OST—RRIF Cohort 3 Modification

Cost (§108)

-9

—

—

—

0**

FAA—Unobligated Balances

-2

—

—

—

0**

FHWA—General Fund (§125)

-68

—

—

—

0**

FRA

-53

—

—

—

0**

FTA—Unobligated Balances (§165)

-1

—

—

—

0**

MARAD

-42

—

-70

—

0**

Maritime Security Program

-17

—

—

—

0**

Cable Security Fleet

—

—

-10

—

—

Tanker Security Program

-21

—

-60

—

0**

Ship Disposal

-4

—

—

—

0**

User Fees

-188

-204

-193

-204

-188

PHMSA

-188

-204

-193

-204

-188

-181

-196

-186

-196

-181

Underground Natural Gas

Storage Facility Safety Account

-7

-7

-7

-7

-7

Liquefied Natural Gas Siting

*

*

*

*

*

Administrations and Accounts

Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed

Spending (non-add)

Total Appropriations

Rescissions

Pipeline Safety Fund

Congressional Research Service

FY2025

Enacted

8

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

Net Discretionary Budget

Authority

26,987

25,468

25,132

28,485

25,246

Limitations on Obligations

(Mandatory Funding)

79,378

80,945

81,539

81,595

81,539

FAA—Airport and Airways Trust

Fund

3,350

3,350

4,000

4,000

4,000**

FHWA—Highway Trust Funda

60,096

61,314

61,314

61,314

61,314**

927

965

909

965

909**

NHTSA—Highway Trust Fund

1,015

1,037

1,037

1,037

1,037**

FTA—Highway Trust Fund

13,990

14,279

14,279

14,279

14,279**

47

47

47

47

47

106,365

106,412

106,671

110,080

106,785

Administrations and Accounts

Federal Motor Carrier Safety

Administration (FMCSA)—Highway

Trust Fund

PHMSA—Emergency Preparedness

Fund (non-add)

Total Budgetary Resources

(Mandatory + Discretionary)c

FY2025

Enacted

Source: FY2024 Enacted, FY2025 Request, and FY2025 House Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative

Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 118-584, as well as congressional budget

justifications. FY2025 Senate Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget

Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 118-199. FY2025 enacted figures are taken from the funding table in Book

II of the Explanatory Statement published in the January 22, 2026 Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909).

Notes: An "*" indicates amount rounds to less than $1 million; and "—" indicates amount is not available or not

applicable. A “**” denotes that the continuing resolution contained an anomaly that specified an alternative

funding level for the account. Agency subaccounts are italicized to differentiate from agency accounts. Consistent

with source materials, line items labeled as “non-add” are not included in account-level summary totals. Not

shown in this table, Division B of P.L. 118-158 (the law that contained in Division A the second FY2025

continuing resolution) provided $8 billion for FHWA’s Emergency Relief Program, which funds the repair or

replacement of disaster-damaged highway infrastructure such as the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Maryland.

a. For FHWA, there is an additional $739 million of mandatory budget authority that is exempt from the

limitation on obligations.

b. FY2025 value varies from FY2024 due to fee revenue estimation, rather than an anomaly.

c. Advance appropriations from Division J of P.L. 117-58 are not included in these totals, but are presented in

Table 4.

Selected FY2025 DOT Appropriations Topics

National Infrastructure Investments (Mega/RAISE Grants)

The Office of the Secretary’s (OST’s) National Infrastructure Investments account supports the

National Infrastructure Project Assistance discretionary grant program (49 U.S.C. §6701), also

known as Mega. Mega grants support large-scale projects and are authorized by Section 21201 of

P.L. 117-58. The National Infrastructure Investments account also supports the Local and

Regional Project Assistance discretionary grants program (49 U.S.C. §6702), also known as

Congressional Research Service

9

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD).2 BUILD grants support

multimodal projects for state, local, and tribal governments and are authorized by Section 21202

of P.L. 117-58. For FY2025, the National Infrastructure Investments account received $345

million for BUILD grants, matching FY2024 enacted levels of funding. The Senate committee

bill proposed $550 million in new appropriations, which is 65% more than the $334 million

enacted in FY2024. The account received $2.5 billion in supplemental advance appropriations in

FY2025 from P.L. 117-58, which includes $1 billion for Mega and $1.5 billion for RAISE.3

Federal Railroad Administration

The Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA’s) Federal-State Partnership for Inner City Passenger

Rail account supports state of good repair and service improvement efforts of the Northeast

Corridor (NEC).4 The account also supports other national efforts to improve intercity passenger

rail corridors and provide new corridor services. For FY2025, the account was provided $75

million which matches FY2024 enacted levels. The Senate committee bill matched the

President’s request of $100 million for the account. The House committee bill included no new

funding for FY2025. The account received $7.2 billion in supplemental advance appropriations

from P.L. 117-58 for FY2025.

The FRA’s account for the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, also known as Amtrak,

supports grants for the Northeast Corridor and for the National Network. For FY2025, the

account was provided $2.4 billion, which matches FY2024 enacted levels. The House committee

bill included $2.1 billion and the Senate committee bill included $2.6 billion for the Amtrak

account. The House committee bill would have provided 15% less than the President requested

and 24% less than the Senate committee bill proposed for the account for FY2025. The Senate

committee bill included $1.6 billion for the National Network grant program while the House

committee bill included 31% less funding for FY2025 ($1.1 billion). The Amtrak account is also

to receive $4.4 billion in supplemental appropriations from P.L. 117-58, which would provide

$1.2 billion to support the Northeast Corridor grants and $3.2 billion to support National Network

grants.

Federal Transit Administration

The Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA’s) Transit Infrastructure Grants account supports

grants for ferry boat service, research and development, buses, bus facilities, earmarks, and more.

For FY2025, the Transit Infrastructure Grants account received $46 million, which is an 82%

decrease in funding compared to FY2025 ($252 million). The Senate committee bill included

$346 million in new appropriations, 200% more than the House committee bill ($116 million). Of

the Senate committee’s amount, 19% would have been for earmarks as identified in the Senate

Appropriations Committee report. The House committee bill proposed funding level for the

account was entirely composed of community project funding.

The FTA’s account for Capital Investment Grants supports state, local, and private investment in

capital projects for new and expanded transit service. For FY2025, the account was provided $2.2

billion, which matches FY2024 enacted levels. The President’s request of $2.4 billion and the

Senate committee proposed funding level ($2.3 billion) were similar to the FY2024 enacted

amount of $2.2 billion. The House committee recommended $755 million in discretionary

2 For more information on the BUILD program, see CRS Report R48863, Local and Regional Project Assistance

Program: Background and Selected Considerations, by Jennifer J. Marshall.

3 Division J, Title VIII.

4 49 U.S.C. §24911.

Congressional Research Service

10

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

funding, 68% below the request. The account received $1.6 billion in supplemental

appropriations in FY2025 from P.L. 117-58. The House Appropriations Committee report

recommended adjusting supplemental appropriations provided via P.L. 117-58 to ensure that the

FY2025 enacted amounts, unallocated amounts from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024

(P.L. 118-42), and the supplemental appropriations do not exceed $2.864 billion.5

Maritime Administration

The Maritime Administration (MARAD) supports programs for U.S. shipyards, ports, waterways,

ships and shipping, vessel operations, ship disposal, and maritime education. For FY2025, the

account was provided 8.4% below (-$82 million) FY2024 enacted levels ($982 million). There

was no funding to the National Defense Reserve Fleet account as was provided in FY2024 ($12

million). For 2025, the Port Infrastructure Development Program account received 58% less (-$70

million) than FY2024 enacted levels ($120 million). The Senate committee bill included a total of

$1.143 billion for MARAD for FY2025, 24% more than included in the House committee bill

($919 million). The percentage differences in the proposed funding levels of the House

committee and the Senate committee were highest in the State Maritime Academy Operations

account and the Assistance to Small Shipyards account.

The State Maritime Academy Operations account supports six academies that train mariners. The

Senate committee bill included $178 million, 51% more than the House committee bill ($118

million) and 105% more than the President’s request ($87 million) for this account for FY2025.

For MARAD’s Assistance to Small Shipyards account, the House committee bill proposal

matched the FY2024 enacted amount of $9 million and the Senate committee bill matched the

FY2025 President’s request of $20 million. MARAD’s Tanker Security Program account supports

10 U.S. flag product tankers to support deployed Armed Forces. The House and the Senate

committees’ bills included $120 million for the Tanker Security Program, which would have

doubled the FY2024 enacted amount and the FY2025 President’s request ($60 million).

Earmarks

For 2025, under the terms of the year-long CR, there was no funding provided for Community

Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending projects (CPF/CDS, also referred to as

“earmarks”). The House committee bill proposed $1.5 billion in new CPF/CDS appropriations

while the Senate committee bill proposed $942 million (Table 3). Under FHWA’s Highway

Infrastructure Programs account, the FY2025 combined earmarks included by the appropriations

committees (House: $1.1 billion; Senate: $568 million) total 88% of the FY2024 enacted amount

($1.9 billion). Neither committee earmarked funding under the FAA’s Facilities and Equipment

account for FY2025, compared with $15 million in FY2024. For FTA, the House committee

proposed $116 million for earmarks, while the Senate committee proposed $66 million. For

MARAD, the House committee requested $22 million for earmarks through the Port

Infrastructure Development Program account, which is less than one-third of the earmarked

funding enacted in FY2024 ($70 million), while the Senate committee included no earmarks in

this account. Under OST’s Transportation Planning, Research, and Development account, the

Senate committee included nearly four times as much earmarked funding ($11 million) as was

enacted in FY2024 ($3 million).

5 U.S. Congress, House Appropriations Committee, Departments of Transportation, and Housing and Urban

Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2025, Report of the Committee on Appropriations, House of

Representatives, 118th Cong., 2nd sess., July 12, 2024, p. 56.

Congressional Research Service

11

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

In some accounts, earmarks would have nearly met or exceed prior-year appropriation levels if

funding from both chambers were incorporated. Under the Airport Discretionary Grants account,

the combined earmark recommendations of the two committees (House: $258 million; Senate:

$221 million) nearly equals the FY2024 enacted level ($482 million). For FRA’s Consolidated

Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) account, the two committees together

included 16% more funding for earmarks in FY2025 ($115 million) than was enacted in FY2024

($99 million).

Table 3. Department of Transportation, FY2024-FY2025 Community Project

Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending

(dollars in millions)

Administrations

Accounts

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2025

Enacted

OST

Transportation

Planning, Research,

and Development

3

—

—

11

0

FAA

Facilities and

Equipment

15

—

—

—

0

Airport

Discretionary Grants

482

—

258

221

0

1,884

—

1,085

568

0

FHWA

Highway

Infrastructure

Programs

FRA

Consolidated Rail

Infrastructure and

Safety Improvements

99

—

39

76

0

FTA

Transit Infrastructure

Grants

207

—

116

66

0

MARAD

Port Infrastructure

Development

Program

70

—

22

—

0

2,761

—

1,520

942

0

Total

Sources: FY2024 Enacted, FY2025 Request, and FY2025 House Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative

Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 118-584, as well as congressional budget

justifications. FY2025 Senate Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget

Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 118-199. Earmark funding levels are proposed in H.R. 9028 and S. 4796.

Project descriptions can be found in H.Rept. 118-584 and S.Rept. 118-199. FY2025 enacted figures are taken

from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in January 22, 2026 Congressional Record

(pp. H1888-H1909).

Sources of FY2024 Enacted Budget Authority

Annually, DOT typically receives funding through three types of budget authority (Table 4).

Mandatory budget authority was 55.4% ($79.4 billion) of DOT’s budget authority for FY2024.

P.L. 117-58 provided supplemental advance appropriations to DOT for FY2022-FY2026. In

FY2024, advance appropriations from P.L. 117-58 accounted for 25.7% of DOT’s total budget

authority. For FY2024, Congress provided DOT with $27 billion in discretionary budget

authority, accounting for 18.8% of DOT’s total funding. In FY2025, advance appropriations from

P.L. 117-58 accounted for 25.6% of DOT’s total budget authority, discretionary appropriations of

Congressional Research Service

12

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

$25.3 billion accounted for 17.6% of DOT’s total budget and mandatory budget authority

accounted for 56.8%.

OST, FRA, and PHMSA received the majority of its FY2024 funding via advance appropriations

enacted in P.L. 117-58. FAA and MARAD received the majority of funding as discretionary

budget authority. FTA and the FHWA received the most funding through mandatory budget

authority in FY2024.

While Table 4 illustrates the sources of FY2024 funding, note that the same amount and

distribution of funding from P.L. 117-58 is slated to be available in FY2025.

Table 4. Department of Transportation Budget Authority by Source, FY2024

(dollars in millions)

P.L. 117-58

Emergency

Supplemental

Funding

Annual

Discretionary

Funding

Mandatory

Funding

Total

Funding

OST

3,800

1,058

—

4,858

FAA

5,000

16,732

3,350

25,082

FHWA

9,454

2,156

60,096

71,706

FMCSA

135

—

927

1,062

NHTSA

322

223

1,015

1,560

FRA

13,200

2,970

—

16,170

FTA

4,250

2,614

13,990

20,854

GLSLSDC

—

40

—

40

MARAD

450

941

—

1,391

PHMSA

200

136

—

336

OIG

—

116

—

116

36,811

26,987

79,378

143,176

Administrations

Total Appropriations by Type

Sources: P.L. 117-58 Emergency Supplemental Funding totals are taken from S.Rept. 118-70 accompanying S.

2437, “Other Appropriations,” pp. 224-227. Annual Discretionary Funding and Mandatory Funding figures are

taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority tables published in the Explanatory Statement

accompanying H.R. 4366 as passed the House and Senate, as well as the text of the Explanatory Statement and

bill, all available in the March 5, 2024, Congressional Record for Division F.

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Overview

HUD is the nation’s housing agency. The programs and activities it administers are designed

primarily to address housing problems faced by households with very low incomes or other

special housing needs, and to expand access to homeownership.6 The largest share of HUD’s

budget is devoted to its rental assistance programs: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers; projectbased rental assistance via Section 8, Section 202, and Section 811; and public housing. These

6 For more information about federal housing assistance programs, see CRS Report RL34591, Overview of Federal

Housing Assistance Programs and Policy, by Maggie McCarty, Libby Perl, and Katie Jones.

Congressional Research Service

13

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

programs, which serve over 4.6 million households, provide subsidies to allow low-income

recipients to pay below-market, income-based rent.

Two flexible block grant programs—the HOME Investment Partnerships grant program and the

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program—help states and local governments

finance a variety of housing and community development activities designed to serve low-income

families. Indian tribes receive their own direct housing and community development grants

through the Native American Housing Block Grant and Indian Community Development Block

Grant programs.

Other more specialized grant programs help communities meet the needs of homeless persons

(through the Homeless Assistance Grants, namely the Continuum of Care and Emergency

Solutions Grants programs), including those living with HIV/AIDS (through the Housing

Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program). Additional programs fund fair housing

enforcement activities and lead-based paint hazard identification and remediation, along with

other healthy homes initiatives.

HUD’s Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insures mortgages made by lenders to

homebuyers with low down payments and to developers of multifamily rental buildings

containing relatively affordable units. FHA collects fees from borrowers with FHA-insured

mortgages, which are used to sustain its insurance funds. The Government National Mortgage

Association (GNMA), or Ginnie Mae, is also a part of HUD and it guarantees securities made up

of federally insured or guaranteed mortgages.

Table 5 provides detailed appropriations information for HUD accounts and selected

subaccounts, comparing FY2024 enacted to FY2025.

Components of HUD Funding

Nearly all of HUD’s funding is provided via discretionary appropriations, generally contained in the annual THUD

appropriations act. (HUD programs may also receive additional resources from supplemental or other funding

measures in some years, most often in response to disasters.) The annual THUD bill provides budget authority via

appropriations for HUD programs and activities for a given fiscal year. The cost of that budget authority, as

determined by the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO’s) scorekeeping process, is generally reduced by offsetting

receipts from the FHA’s loan programs and GNMA’s securitization of federally insured or guaranteed mortgages.

To a lesser extent, other collections and rescissions of prior-year appropriations can also offset the cost of the

HUD budget. Deducting the savings from offsets and rescissions from the gross budget authority provided to HUD

results in net budget authority. Generally, gross budget authority is the most useful measure of the new resources

being provided for HUD’s programs and activities, whereas net budget authority is used for budget enforcement

purposes and measuring against 302(b) allocations. Any funding designated as an emergency requirement provided

in the regular annual appropriations acts or in supplemental spending bills is generally exempt for purposes of

budget enforcement.

HUD also generally receives a relatively small amount of mandatory funding outside of the annual appropriations

process, such as contributions from the Government Sponsored Enterprises (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) to

fund the Housing Trust Fund. These mandatory funds are generally not reflected in this report.

Table 5. Department of Housing and Urban Development,

FY2024-FY2025 Detailed Appropriations

(dollars in millions)

Accounts

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2025

Final

Appropriations

Congressional Research Service

14

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2025

Final

Salaries and Expenses (Management and

Administration)

1,803

1,909

1,803

1,902a

1,803

Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (Section 8

Housing Choice Vouchers)

26,387

27,467

32,272

27,230

30,041**

Tenant-Based Rental Assistance—Emergency

Designated (non-add)

6,000

5,289

0

8,030

6,000

Total Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (incl. emergency

funding) (non-add)

32,387

32,756

28,500

35,260

36,041

Voucher Renewals (incl. emergency, non-add)

28,491

28,550

28,500

32,035

32,145

Administrative Fees (non-add)

2,771

2,964

2,771

2,880

2,771

VASH (non-add)

15

0

0

15

15

FUP (non-add)

30

0

0

30

30

Other Incremental Vouchers (non-add)

—

241

0

0

0

8,811

8,540

8,214

8,783

8,811

Operating Grants (non-add)

5,476

5,050

5,097

5,366

5,476

Capital Grants (non-add)

3,200

3,200

3,047

3,200

3,200

Operational Performance Evaluation and Risk

Assessments

50

50

50

50

50

Choice Neighborhoods

75

140

0

100

75

Self Sufficiency Programs

196

175

175

201

196

Native American Programs

1,344

1,053

1,455

1,455

1,344

Native American Block Grants (Formula) (nonadd)

1,111

820

1,222

1,217

1,111

Native American Block Grants (Competitive)

(non-add)

150

150

150

150

150

Indian Community Development Block Grants

(non-add)

75

75

75

80

75

Indian Housing Loan Guarantee

2

2

2

2

2

Native Hawaiian Block Grant

22

22

0

22

22

Housing, Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)

505

505

505

524

505

Community Development Fund

6,720

2,930

5,506

4,617

3,430**

CDBG Formula Grants

3,300

2,800

3,300

3,300

3,300

SUPPORT for Patients and Communities

30

30

30

30

30

Grants to Reduce Barriers to Affordable Housing

100

100

0

100

100

3,290

0

2,176

1,187

0**

1,250

1,250

500

1,425

1,250

Preservation and Reinvestment Initiative for

Community Enhancement

10

0

10

10

10

Self-Help Homeownership

60

55

56

70

60

Accounts

Public Housing Fund

Economic Development Initiatives

HOME Investment Partnerships

Congressional Research Service

15

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2025

Final

Self-Help and Assisted Homeownership

Opportunity Program

12

9

9

13

12

Section 4 Capacity Building

42

41

42

47

42

Rural Capacity Building

6

5

5

10

6

Homeless Assistance Grants

4,051

4,060

4,060

4,319

4,051

Project-Based Rental Assistance (Section 8)

14,010

11,604

16,595

13,654

14,890**

Project-Based Rental Assistance—Emergency

Designated (non-add)

2,000

5,082

0

3,000

2,000

Total Project-Based Rental Assistance (incl. emergency)

16,010

16,686

16,595

16,654

16,890

15,542

16,189

16,127

16,127

16,422

Contract Administrators

468

492

468

492

468

Mark to Market

—

5

0

10

0

Loan Program for Distressed Properties

—

—

—

25

0

Housing for the Elderly (Section 202)

913

931

931

1,046

931**

Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811)

208

257

257

257

257**

Housing Counseling Assistance

58

58

58

58

58

Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fundb

14

14

14

14

14

Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Expensesb

150

155

150

155

150

Government National Mortgage Association

(GNMA) Expensesb

55

67

55

68

55

Research and Technology

139

156

119

150

139

Fair Housing Activities

86

86

85

86

86

Fair Housing Assistance Program (non-add)

26

26

26

26

NS

Fair Housing Initiatives Program (non-add)

56

56

55

56

NS

Lead Hazard Reduction

296

350

335

345

296

Information Technology Fund

383

419

385

436

383

Inspector General

153

160

160

160

153

Gross Appropriations Subtotal (non-emergency)

67,749

62,414

73,751

67,139

69,061

Gross Appropriations Subtotal (incl. emergency)

75,749

72,785

73,751

78,169

77,061

-14

-14

-14

-14

-14

FHA

-4,038

-6,794

-6,794

-6,794

-6,794

GNMA

-1,436

-1,563

-1,563

-1,563

-1,563

-5,488

-8,371

-8,371

-8,371

-8,371

-192

-156

-554

0

0**

-192

-156

-554

0

0

Accounts

Contract Renewals (incl. emergency)

Offsetting Collections and Receipts

Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fund

Offsets Subtotal

Rescissions

Rescissions from Unobligated Balances

Recissions Subtotal

Congressional Research Service

16

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2025

Final

62,069

53,887

64,827

58,768

60,690

—

c

0

0

12,039d

Emergency Appropriations for Regular Program

Operations

8,000

10,371

0

11,030

8,000

Total (incl. all Emergency Spending)

70,069

64,258

64,827

69,798

68,690

Accounts

Net Discretionary Budget Authority

(non-emergency)

Disaster Relief Emergency Funding

Sources: FY2024 Enacted, FY2025 Request, and FY2025 House Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative

Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 118-584, as well as congressional budget

justifications. FY2025 Senate Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget

Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 118-199. FY2025 enacted figures are taken from the funding table in Book

II of the Explanatory Statement published in the January 22, 2026 Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909).

Notes: Figures may not add due to rounding. Some numbers have been adjusted for comparability. A ‘**’

denotes that the continuing resolution contained an anomaly that specified an alternative funding level for the

account.

a. The Senate committee bill includes funding for the Working Capital Fund in the Management and

Administration total. Those funds are not included in this total and are shown separately in this table,

consistent with the House committee and President’s budget presentations.

b. Some or all of the cost of funding these accounts is offset by the collection of fees or other receipts. Those

offsets are shown later in this table.

c. On June 28, 2024, the President submitted a supplemental request to Congress including $700 million for

Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) assistance for communities affected

by disasters in 2023.

d. Division B of P.L. 118-158 (the law that contained in Division A the second FY2025 continuing resolution)

provided $12 billion in emergency funding for the HUD Community Development Fund for assistance in

response to natural disasters that occurred in 2023 or 2024.

Selected FY2025 HUD Appropriations Topics

Emergency-Designated Funding for Rental Assistance Renewals

Among the largest expenses in HUD’s budget are the annual costs of renewing rental assistance

payments for the 3.5 million families who are served by the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher

and project-based rental assistance programs. The renewal costs of these two programs—funded

by the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) and Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA)

accounts, respectively—account for nearly 60% of the total new funding for HUD’s programs and

activities each year.7

As illustrated in Figure 2, the FY2023 and FY2024 appropriations laws funded rental assistance

renewal costs for these two programs using a combination of regular appropriations and

emergency-designated funding. Nearly 9% of renewal funding in the TBRA and PBRA accounts

in FY2023 and 18% in FY2024 was provided as emergency-designated spending, and therefore

not subject to the applicable discretionary spending limits, including the THUD subcommittee’s

302(b) allocations.

For FY2025, the President’s budget proposed again using emergency-designated funding for

rental assistance renewal costs, requesting that 23% of total TBRA and PBRA renewal funding

7 In FY2024, funding for TBRA and PBRA renewals accounted for 58% of HUD’s gross appropriations.

Congressional Research Service

17

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

come from emergency-designated funds. The House committee bill proposed no emergencydesignated funding for renewal costs. The Senate committee bill proposed more overall renewal

funding than requested by the President, and that the same share be emergency-designated as

requested by the President (23%). The full-year CR for FY2025 retained the same amount of

FY2024 emergency-designated funding, but because overall funding increased, the emergencydesignated share decreased from 18% in FY2024 to 16% in FY2025.

Figure 2. Rental Assistance Renewal Funding

Sources: FY2023 Enacted figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as

published in H.Rept. 118-154, beginning on page 410. FY2024 Enacted, FY2025 President’s Budget, and FY2025

House Committee figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as

published in H.Rept. 118-584, as well as congressional budget justifications. FY2025 Senate Committee figures

are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 118-199.

FY2025 enacted figures are taken from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in

January 22, 2026 Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909).

House-Proposed Cut to the HOME Investment Partnerships Program

The House committee bill proposed $500 million in new appropriations for the HOME

Investment Partnerships account in FY2025, representing a 60% cut relative to FY2024

appropriations ($1.25 billion), which is among the largest proposed cuts to any HUD account this

fiscal year.8 The House committee report noted that the American Rescue Plan Act (P.L. 117-2)

provided $5 billion to HOME in 2021 for eligible rental housing activities in response to the

COVID-19 pandemic (HOME-ARP), only 5% of which had been expended.9

The HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) provides formula funding to states, local

governments, and insular areas. Funds can be used for new construction, rehabilitation, and

acquisition of affordable housing for low-income renters, homebuyers, and homeowners, as well

as tenant-based rental assistance.

The President’s budget request for FY2025 designated that up to $50 million of the FY2025

HOME funds be set aside specifically for homebuyer assistance under a proposed FirstHOME

Downpayment Assistance Initiative (FirstHOME). While homebuyer assistance is an eligible use

of HOME funds, and Congress funded a homebuyer assistance set-aside from FY2003 to FY2008

through the American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI), HUD appropriations have not

8 The House-proposed cut to Economic Development Initiatives ($1.1 billion) was larger in dollar terms.

9 H.Rept. 118-584, p. 87.

Congressional Research Service

18

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

previously funded FirstHOME, which was originally proposed in the President’s FY2022 budget.

Neither the House bill nor the Senate bill included FirstHOME set-asides for FY2025. However,

H.Rept. 118-543 requested that HUD encourage participating jurisdictions to prioritize

homeownership activities with their regular HOME grants, as those activities are not an eligible

use of HOME-ARP funds.10

The full year CR continued the FY2024 funding level for HOME in FY2025.

General Provisions

Each year, the THUD appropriations act includes dozens of General Provisions (GPs) for HUD,

which involve administrative guidance on how funding provided in the act should and should not

be used and, in some cases, amendments to laws that govern the department’s programs and

activities. Many of these GPs are carried over from year to year, but some new GPs are generally

added each year. Some of the new GPs under consideration for the FY2025 appropriations cycle

are discussed below.

Contract Administrators

HUD has been unsuccessfully attempting to rebid the performance-based contract administrator

(PBCA) contracts it uses to help manage the PBRA program for more than a decade. In the

FY2025 budget request, as in previous requests, the Administration sought a provision that would

have authorized the department to use cooperative agreements in lieu of procurement contracts

when making performance-based contract administrator awards for the PBRA program. The

Senate Committee bill (§234) contained a provision similar to that requested by the President’s

budget. The House Committee bill (§239) proposed to amend an existing statute to establish a

new competitive process for awarding PBCA contracts every seven years.

The full-year CR did not contain any of the language proposed by the President’s budget, the

House committee bill or the Senate committee bill.

Notice to Vacate

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security

(CARES) Act (P.L. 116-136) contained a temporary moratorium on the filing of evictions, as well

as other protections for tenants in certain rental properties with federal assistance or federally

related financing. One of those provisions, Section 4024(c), requires landlords of covered

properties to provide tenants at least 30 days’ notice before they must vacate a property following

an eviction. That provision was not covered by the same sunset date as the other tenant-related

provisions of the act, thus the 30-day notice to vacate requirement is still in effect. A number of

housing industry groups—including the National Apartment Association (NAA) and the National

Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC)11—have advocated for the repeal of the provision, and

repeal legislation (H.R. 802) was ordered reported by the House Financial Services committee in

118th Congress. These repeal efforts have been opposed by low-income housing and tenant

10 HOME-ARP funds have restrictions and eligible uses that are not equivalent to traditional HOME funds. HOME-

ARP funds can be used for rental housing acquisition, rehabilitation, and construction; TBRA; supportive services; and

acquisition and development of non-congregate shelter. 70% of HOME-ARP rental units must be occupied by

qualifying populations who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, and 100% of HOME-ARP funds used for TBRA,

supportive services, and shelter units must benefit such qualifying populations. See HUD Notice CPD-21-10 at

https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/OCHCO/documents/2021-10cpdn.pdf.

11 NAA, “NAA, NMHC Applaud Bill to Restore Routine Housing Operations, Remove Federal Intrusion,” press

release, https://www.naahq.org/naa-nmhc-applaud-bill-restore-routine-housing-operations-remove-federal-intrusion.

Congressional Research Service

19

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

advocates such as the Low-Income Housing Coalition.12 The House committee bill contained a

repeal in its GPs (§243); the Senate committee bill contained no such provision and no such

provision was included in the full-year CR.

Native American Housing

The House committee bill and the Senate committee bill each included multiple GPs related to

Native American housing programs or tribes’ participation in housing programs. Some of these

provisions were included in both bills. None of the provisions described below were included in

the full-year CR.

The House and the Senate committee bills both included a provision (§236 in the House bill,

§242 in the Senate bill) to amend the Section 184 Indian Home Loan Guarantee Program, which

guarantees home loans made to eligible tribal members, to expand the geographic area where it

can be used. The President’s budget included a similar proposal.13 The provision in the Senate

committee bill would also have amended the Section 184A Native Hawaiian Home Loan

Guarantee program, which guarantees home loans for Native Hawaiians, to expand the

geographic areas where it can be used beyond the Hawaiian Home Lands; the provision in the

House committee bill did not address the Section 184A program. Both the House and the Senate

committee bills also included a GP (§237 in the House bill, §244 in the Senate bill) that would

have amended the Indian Community Development Block Grant (ICDBG) program to allow

tribes to carry out certain types of activities directly, rather than only through certain types of

nonprofits or other eligible organizations.

The House committee bill included a GP related to how certain housing units that are being used

in the Tribal HUD Veteran Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program are treated for the

purposes of the Native American Housing Block Grant (NAHBG) allocation formula. Part of the

NAHBG formula involves the number of housing units that received HUD assistance prior to the

NAHBG’s establishment that the tribe continues to own or operate, known as formula current

assisted stock. Currently, HUD requires that any such units that are leased using a Tribal HUDVASH voucher must be removed from the NAHBG formula calculation; they can be added back

when they are no longer being used in Tribal HUD-VASH.14 The House committee bill (§235)

proposed that formula current assisted stock units that are utilizing Tribal HUD-VASH vouchers

continue to be included in the NAHBG formula for the purposes of the FY2025 funding. The

Senate committee bill did not include such a provision.

The Senate committee bill included GPs to address certain aspects of tribes’ use of funds under

HUD’s Continuum of Care program (§241) and would have amended the Section 184 and Section

184A programs to allow loan terms of up to 40 years in the case of a loan modification (§243).

These provisions were not included in the House committee bill. The President’s budget included

12 National Low-Income Housing Coalition, “House Financial Services Committee Republicans Pass Bill to Eliminate

“CARES Act” 30-Day Eviction Notice Requirement,” April 22, 2024, https://nlihc.org/resource/house-financialservices-committee-republicans-pass-bill-eliminate-cares-act-30-day.

13 HUD FY2025 Budget Justifications, p. 14-3, https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/CFO/documents/2025_CJ_Program__Indian_Housing_Loan_Guarantee_Fund.pdf.

14 HUD Office of Native American Programs Program Guidance 2018-01, https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/PIH/

documents/2018-01ihbgtribalguidance.PDF.

Congressional Research Service

20

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

legislative proposals for additional flexibilities for tribes in the Continuum of Care program15 and

for 40-year loan modification terms in the Section 18416 and Section 184A17 programs.

Energy Efficiency Standards

Section 109 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended most

recently by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, addresses minimum energy

efficiency standards for newly constructed housing that is assisted or financed through certain

HUD or U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs.18 The standards are based on the

International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for single-family homes and low-rise

multifamily buildings, and on the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and AirConditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1 for high-rise multifamily buildings. The law

includes procedures for HUD and USDA to apply periodic revisions to the IECC Code and

ASHRAE 90.1 standard to new construction under the covered housing programs, subject to

certain determinations. In April 2024, HUD and USDA published a notice in the Federal Register

adopting more recent IECC and ASHRAE 90.1 editions—the 2021 IECC and ASHRAE 90.12019—for newly constructed housing under covered housing programs.19 The compliance date

varies by program. The House committee bill contained a GP (§242) that would have prohibited

HUD from using any funds made available in the act to update minimum energy efficiency

standards for new housing funded by the department as part of carrying out the April 2024

Federal Register notice or otherwise. The Senate committee bill contained no such provision and

no such provision was included in the full-year CR.

THUD Related Agencies

The annual THUD appropriations bill generally provides funding for seven independent agencies

that undertake activities related to transportation and/or housing:

•

•

•

The U.S. Access Board is an independent federal agency designed to coordinate

other federal agencies to promote accessible design and the development of

accessibility guidelines and standards to ensure access to federally funded public

infrastructure for persons with disabilities.20

The Federal Maritime Commission is an independent federal agency charged

with regulating U.S. ocean commerce.21

The Amtrak Inspector General is an independent organization charged with

providing oversight of Amtrak’s programs and operations.22

15 HUD FY2025 Budget Justifications, p. 22-9, https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/CFO/documents/2025_CJ_Program_-

_HAG.pdf.

16 Ibid., p. 14-3.

17 Ibid., p. 16-3.

18 42 U.S.C. §12709

19 HUD and USDA, “Final Determination: Adoption of Energy Efficiency Standards for New Construction of HUDand USDA-Financed Housing,” 89 Federal Register 33112-33182, April 26, 2024, https://www.federalregister.gov/

documents/2024/04/26/2024-08793/final-determination-adoption-of-energy-efficiency-standards-for-new-constructionof-hud—and.

20 See https://www.access-board.gov/about/.

21 See https://www.fmc.gov/about-the-fmc/.

22 See https://amtrakoig.gov/about-us.

Congressional Research Service

21

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

•

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigates accidents,

crashes, and other events in transportation.23

The Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (NeighborWorks America) is a

congressionally chartered nonprofit that supports a network of community

organizations that provide affordable housing, financial counseling, and resident

engagement.24

The Surface Transportation Board is an independent federal agency that is “the

economic regulation of various modes of surface transportation, primarily freight

rail.”25

The Interagency Council on Homelessness is an independent federal agency

charged with coordinating the federal response to homelessness.26

•

•

•

Table 6. THUD Related Agencies, FY2024-FY2025 Detailed Appropriations

(dollars in millions)

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

FY2025

House

Comm.

Access Board

10

10

10

10

10

Federal Maritime Commission

40

48

43

45

40

National Railroad Passenger

Corporation (Amtrak) Office of

Inspector General

29

32

32

32

29

National Transportation Safety Board

140

150

145

145

145**

Neighborhood Reinvestment

Corporation (NeighborWorks)

158

168

158

168

158

Surface Transportation Board

47

51

51

51

47

Offsetting Collections

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

U.S. Interagency Council on

Homelessness

4

4

4

4

4

428

462

442

454

433

Related Agency

Total

FY2025

Senate

Comm.

FY2025

Enacted

Sources: FY2024 Enacted, FY2025 Request, and FY2025 House Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative

Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 118-584, as well as congressional budget

justifications. FY2025 Senate Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget

Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 118-199. FY2025 enacted figures are taken from the funding table in Book

II of the Explanatory Statement published in January 22, 2026 Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909).

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. A ‘**’ denotes that the continuing resolution contained an anomaly

that specified an alternative funding level for the account.

23 See https://www.ntsb.gov/about/Pages/default.aspx.

24 See https://www.neighborworks.org/About-Us.

25 See https://www.stb.gov/about-stb/.

26 See https://www.usich.gov/about-usich/.

Congressional Research Service

22

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

Appendix. Overview of the FY2025 Budget Process

The consideration of the FY2025 THUD appropriations proposals takes place in the context of

the broader annual federal budget process, which begins with the release of the President’s

budget, generally followed by the adoption of a congressional budget resolution setting overall

spending limits, and development and consideration of the 12 annual appropriations acts

(including THUD).

The President’s budget request for the upcoming fiscal year is due to be submitted to Congress by

the first Monday in February, although it is not uncommon for the submission to happen after this

date. The President’s budget request for FY2025 was submitted on March 11, 2024, about five

weeks after it was due. Its release occurred in the same month as enactment of FY2024 full-year

annual appropriations (P.L. 118-42 and P.L. 118-47), which was about six months into the fiscal

year. The relationship between enactment of final FY2024 appropriations and the budget

submission means that funding amounts in the President’s FY2025 budget materials generally do

not reflect final FY2024 enacted funding levels and instead present estimates based on the

continuing resolutions in place at the time the budget documents were prepared.

For FY2025, the discretionary spending levels in appropriations measures were enforceable by

both statutory and procedural means. Statutory budget enforcement is through the discretionary

spending limits in the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (BBEDCA;

P.L. 99-177), as amended. These statutory limits are enforced through sequestration, which is a

largely across-the-board reduction made to the category of spending that is in excess of the limit

(defense or nondefense) to eliminate the excess spending.27 The statutory limits on discretionary

spending that were in effect for the FY2025 funding cycle were enacted as part of the FRA on

June 3, 2023.28 The FRA amended the BBEDCA to provide limits on defense discretionary (all

spending under budget function 050) and nondefense discretionary (all other spending) for

FY2024 and FY2025.29 Nearly all of the funding in the THUD bill is subject to the nondefense

limit.30

Procedural budget enforcement is primarily associated with the budget resolution, which provides

a process for the House and Senate to agree on budgetary targets ahead of consideration of

spending and revenue legislation. These targets are enforced through points of order. The budget

resolution is used each year to impose a limit on total discretionary spending available to the

appropriations committees (commonly referred to as a 302(a) allocation) and, subsequently,

limits on spending under the jurisdiction of each appropriations subcommittee (referred to as

302(b) suballocations).31

The House Budget Committee ordered reported a FY2025 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 117;

H.Rept. 118-568), although it was not considered by the full House; no Senate action was taken

27 The FRA also contains procedures by which these limits might be temporarily or permanently adjusted in the case of

a continuing resolution. For a summary of these adjustments, see CRS Insight IN12168, Discretionary Spending Caps

in the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023.

28 Ibid.

29 For further information, see CRS Insight IN12183, The FRA’s Discretionary Spending Caps Under a CR: FAQs, by

Drew C. Aherne and Megan S. Lynch.

30 A relatively small amount of DOT funding is considered subject to the defense spending cap ($362 million in

FY2024).

31 For further information, see CRS Report 98-815, Budget Resolution Enforcement.

Congressional Research Service

23

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

prior to enactment of final FY2025 appropriations.32 For the purposes of providing 302(a)

allocations and budgetary aggregates for the consideration of FY2025 appropriations, as well as

other matters that would have traditionally been associated with the budget resolution, the FRA

allows the chair of the Senate Budget Committee to enter those amounts into the Congressional

Record not later than May 15;33 these were published May 14.34

Generally, the next step in the appropriations process is for each of the appropriations committees

to adopt suballocations from the total amount available from the 302(a) allocation. These 302(b)

suballocations provide a limit on current-year (i.e., FY2025) appropriations within each

subcommittee’s jurisdiction and incorporate any applicable scorekeeping adjustments made by

CBO.35 On May 23, the House Appropriations Committee voted to approve draft (interim)

suballocations for all 12 bills, including THUD,36 based on the overall spending limit included in

the FRA. The interim suballocations have since been revised.37 (These draft suballocations, and

subsequent revised suballocations, have not been reported to the House.) The Senate

Appropriations Committee reported to the Senate a full set of 302(b) suballocations on July 11;38

they were revised several times subsequently.39

Table A-1 shows the suballocation to the THUD subcommittees, compared to the applicable

FY2023 and FY2024 enacted levels and the President’s FY2025 budget request and final FY2025

enacted funding level.

Table A-1. FY2025 THUD 302(b) Suballocations, in Context

(dollars in billions)

FY2023

Enacted

FY2024

Enacted

FY2025

Request

House

FY2025

Draft 302(b)

Senate

FY2025

302(b)

FY2025

Enacted

87.332

89.484

79.818

90.400

114.495

86.370

THUD Regular

Discretionary Net

Budget Authority

Sources: The FY2023 Enacted amount comes from the FY2023 enacted total found in the current services

budget authority table, located in the explanatory statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act,

32 Following enactment of full-year FY2025 appropriations, both the House and the Senate took action on an FY2025

budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 14 and S.Con.Res. 7, respectively). This action, however, primarily involved the

development of reconciliation legislation, and the topline level for FY2025 reflected actions already taken by Congress.

For more information, see CRS Insight IN12353, Discretionary Spending: Setting a Topline Amount for FY2025

Appropriations.

33 For more information, see CRS Insight IN12353, Discretionary Spending: Setting a Topline Amount for FY2025

Appropriations.

34 “Budget Enforcement Levels,” Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 170, no. 83 (May 14, 2024), pp. S3679S3670

35 Such suballocations are commonly revised throughout the appropriations process to reflect changing budgetary

priorities.

36 House Appropriations Committee, “Committee Approves FY25 Subcommittee Allocations, Prioritizing Defense,

Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs,” press release, May 23, 2024, https://appropriations.house.gov/news/pressreleases/committee-approves-fy25-subcommittee-allocations-prioritizing-defense-homeland.

37 The House Appropriations Committee draft suballocations were revised on July 10, 2024, as published at

https://appropriations.house.gov/events/markups/full-committee-markup-fiscal-year-2025-labor-health-and-humanservices-and-education.

38 S.Rept. 118-190.

39 S.Rept. 118-197; S.Rept. 118-203; S.Rept. 119-3.

Congressional Research Service

24

FY2025 THUD Appropriations

2024, as shown in H. Comm. 55-007, p. 1577. The FY2024 Enacted and FY2025 Request amounts come from the

respective columns in the current services budget authority table located in H.Rept. 118-543, page 376. House

FY2025 Draft 302(b) amounts are taken from https://appropriations.house.gov/events/markups/full-committeemarkup-fiscal-year-2025-labor-health-and-human-services-and-education. Senate FY2025 302(b) amounts are

taken from S.Rept. 119-3 . FY2025 enacted figures are taken from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory

Statement published in the January 22, 2026 Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909), revised to reflect

scorekeeping adjustments.

Notes: Amounts reflect current-year discretionary budget authority subject to spending limits. Emergency

appropriations and mandatory funding, which do not count against discretionary spending limits, are excluded.

Author Information

Maggie McCarty, Coordinator

Specialist in Housing Policy

Jennifer J. Marshall

Analyst in Transportation Policy

Disclaimer

This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan

shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and

under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other

than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in

connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not

subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in

its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or

material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to

copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service

R48253 · VERSION 5 · UPDATED

25

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.