Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Congressional research reportOct 13, 2015

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and

Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

(name redacted), Coordinator

Specialist in Health Policy

(name redacted), Coordinator

Analyst in Health Policy

October 13, 2015

Congressional Research Service

7-....

www.crs.gov

R43304

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Summary

Within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), eight agencies are designated

components of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS). The PHS agencies are funded primarily

with annual discretionary appropriations. They also receive significant amounts of funding from

other sources including mandatory funds from the Affordable Care Act (ACA), user fees, and

third-party reimbursements (collections).



The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) funds research on

improving the quality and delivery of health care. For several years prior to

FY2015, AHRQ did not receive a direct appropriation. Instead, it relied on

redistributed (“set-aside”) funds from other PHS agencies for most of its funding,

with supplemental amounts from the ACA’s Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Trust Fund (PCORTF). In FY2015, AHRQ received its own appropriation in lieu

of set-aside funds. Overall, the agency’s total funding rose from $403 million to

$465 million between FY2010 and FY2015. That increase came despite a

decrease in discretionary funding over that period, which was more than offset by

increasing amounts of PCORTF funding.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the federal

government’s lead public health agency. CDC obtains its funding from multiple

sources besides discretionary appropriations. The agency’s funding fluctuated

between FY2010 and FY2015, with the overall level increasing slightly from

$10.9 billion to $11.3 billion over that period. CDC experienced a drop in its

discretionary appropriations during that time, which was offset by funding from

other sources, primarily the ACA’s Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF).

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) investigates

the public health impact of exposure to hazardous substances. ATSDR is headed

by the CDC director and included in the discussion of CDC in this report.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates drugs, medical devices,

food, and tobacco products, among other consumer products. FDA saw its

funding increase significantly between FY2010 and FY2015 from $3.1 billion to

$4.5 billion. The agency is funded with annual discretionary appropriations and

industry user fees. While appropriations increased modestly over the FY2010FY2015 period, user fees more than doubled and now account for 42% of FDA’s

total funding.

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funds programs

and systems that provide health care services to the uninsured and medically

underserved. HRSA, like CDC, relies on funding from several different sources.

The agency’s funding increased from $8.1 billion in FY2010 to $10.3 billion in

FY2015 despite a significant drop in its discretionary appropriation during that

time. The growth in overall funding was driven largely by increasing amounts

from the ACA’s Community Health Center Fund (CHCF).

The Indian Health Service (IHS) supports a health care delivery system for

Native Americans. IHS’s funding, which includes discretionary appropriations

and collections from third-party payers of health care, increased between FY2010

and FY2015 from $5.1 billion to $5.9 billion. Appropriations and collections both

increased during that period.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funds basic, clinical, and translational

biomedical and behavioral research. NIH gets more than 99% of its funding from

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)



discretionary appropriations. Its funding dropped from $31.2 billion in FY2010

to $30.3 billion in FY2015.

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

(SAMHSA) funds mental health and substance abuse prevention and treatment

services. SAMHSA’s funding, about 95% of which comes from discretionary

appropriations, has remained at about $3.6 billion over the FY2010-FY2015

period.

Congress has yet to complete work on any of the regular appropriations bills for FY2016, which

began on October 1, 2015. On September 30, the President signed the Continuing Appropriations

Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-53). The measure provides continuing appropriations through December 11,

2016. It funds discretionary programs at the same rate (and under the same conditions) as in

FY2015, minus an across-the-board reduction of 0.2108%. For entitlement and other mandatory

spending that is funded through appropriation acts, P.L. 114-53 provides funding to maintain

program levels under current law. This report will be updated with information on PHS agency

funding for FY2016 once legislative action on appropriations for the new fiscal year is

completed.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Contents

Introduction to the PHS Agencies ................................................................................................... 1

Sources of PHS Agency Funding .................................................................................................... 2

Transfers .................................................................................................................................... 2

PHS Program Evaluation Set-Aside.......................................................................................... 3

Mandatory Funding, User Fees, and Collections ...................................................................... 4

Mandatory Appropriations .................................................................................................. 5

User Fees............................................................................................................................. 6

Collections .......................................................................................................................... 6

Recent Trends in PHS Agency Funding .......................................................................................... 6

Impact of Budget Caps and Sequestration ................................................................................ 7

Mandatory Spending ........................................................................................................... 7

Discretionary Spending....................................................................................................... 8

Report Roadmap .............................................................................................................................. 9

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) ................................................................. 11

Agency Overview..................................................................................................................... 11

Agency Funding Since FY2010 .............................................................................................. 12

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ...................................................................... 14

Agency Overview.................................................................................................................... 14

Agency Funding Since FY2010 .............................................................................................. 15

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) .......................................................................................... 19

Agency Overview.................................................................................................................... 19

Agency Funding Since FY2010 .............................................................................................. 20

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) .............................................................. 24

Agency Overview.................................................................................................................... 24

Agency Funding Since FY2010 .............................................................................................. 25

Indian Health Service (IHS) .......................................................................................................... 30

Agency Overview.................................................................................................................... 30

Agency Funding Since FY2010 .............................................................................................. 30

National Institutes of Health (NIH) ............................................................................................... 33

Agency Overview.................................................................................................................... 33

Agency Funding Since FY2010 .............................................................................................. 34

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) ................................. 37

Agency Overview.................................................................................................................... 37

Agency Funding Since FY2010 .............................................................................................. 38

Tables

Table 1. PHS Evaluation Set-Aside Fund Assessments and Transfers in FY2013

and FY2015 .................................................................................................................................. 4

Table 2. Sequestration of Funding for PHS Agency Programs ....................................................... 8

Table 3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) ................................................... 13

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Table 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Agency for Toxic

Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ............................................................................... 16

Table 5. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ............................................................................ 21

Table 6. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) ................................................. 26

Table 7. Indian Health Service (IHS) ............................................................................................ 31

Table 8. National Institutes of Health (NIH) ................................................................................. 35

Table 9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) .................... 39

Table B-1. Community Health Center Fund, FY2011-FY2016 .................................................... 42

Table C-1. PPHF Transfers to HHS Agencies ............................................................................... 44

Table D-1. Distribution of PCORTF Funding ............................................................................... 45

Table E-1. FDA User Fee Authorizations and Revenue ................................................................ 46

Appendixes

Appendix A. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA): FY2009 Supplemental

Appropriations............................................................................................................................ 41

Appendix B. Community Health Center Fund .............................................................................. 42

Appendix C. Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF) ............................................................ 43

Appendix D. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund ................................................... 45

Appendix E. FDA User Fee Authorizations .................................................................................. 46

Contacts

Author Contact Information .......................................................................................................... 47

Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... 47

Key Policy Staff ............................................................................................................................ 47

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Introduction to the PHS Agencies

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has designated eight of its 11 operating

divisions (agencies) as components of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS). The PHS agencies

are: (1) the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), (2) the Agency for Toxic

Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), (3) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

(CDC), (4) the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), (5) the Health Resources and Services

Administration (HRSA), (6) the Indian Health Service (IHS), (7) the National Institutes of Health

(NIH), and (8) the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).1

While the PHS agencies all provide and support essential public health services, their specific

missions vary. With the exception of FDA, the agencies have limited regulatory responsibilities.

Two of them—NIH and AHRQ—are primarily research agencies. NIH conducts and supports

basic, clinical, and translational medical research. AHRQ conducts and supports research on the

quality and effectiveness of health care services and systems.

Three of the agencies—IHS, HRSA, and SAMHSA—provide health care services or help support

systems that deliver such services. IHS supports a health care delivery system for American

Indians and Alaska Natives. Health services are provided directly by the IHS, as well as through

tribally contracted and operated health programs, and through services purchased from private

providers. HRSA funds programs and systems to improve access to health care among lowincome populations, pregnant women and children, persons living with HIV/AIDS, rural and

frontier populations, and others who are medically underserved. SAMHSA funds communitybased mental health and substance abuse prevention and treatment services.

CDC is a public health agency that develops and supports community-based and population-wide

programs and systems to promote quality of life and prevent the leading causes of disease, injury,

disability, and death. ATSDR, which is headed by the CDC director and included in the discussion

of CDC in this report, is tasked with identifying potential public health effects from exposure to

hazardous substances. Finally, FDA is primarily a regulatory agency, whose mission is to ensure

the safety of foods, dietary supplements, and cosmetics, and the safety and effectiveness of drugs,

vaccines, medical devices, and other health products. In 2009, Congress gave FDA the authority

to regulate the manufacture, marketing, and distribution of tobacco products in order to protect

public health.

The programs and activities of five of the PHS agencies—AHRQ, CDC, HRSA, NIH, and

SAMHSA—are mostly authorized under the Public Health Service Act (PHSA).2 While some of

FDA’s regulatory activities are also authorized under the PHSA, the agency and its programs

derive most of their statutory authority from the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

(FFDCA).3 HRSA’s maternal and child health programs are authorized by the Social Security Act

HHS also includes three human services agencies that are not part of the Public Health Service: (1) the Administration

for Children and Families (ACF); (2) the Administration for Community Living (ACL), which was created in April

2012 by consolidating the Administration on Aging (AoA), the HHS Office on Disability, and ACF’s Administration

on Developmental Disability; and (3) the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Departmental leadership

is provided by the Office of the Secretary (OS), which is comprised of various subdivisions including the Assistant

Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), the Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH), the Office of the Surgeon

General, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and the Office of the National

Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). For more information on HHS and links to the PHS agency

websites, see http://www.hhs.gov/.

42 U.S.C. §§201 et seq.

21 U.S.C. §§301 et seq.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

(SSA),4 and many of the IHS programs and services are authorized by the Indian Health Care

Improvement Act.5 ATSDR was created by the Comprehensive Environmental Response,

Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, the “Superfund” law).6

Sources of PHS Agency Funding

The primary source of funding for each PHS agency is the discretionary budget authority it

receives through the annual appropriations process.7 AHRQ, CDC, HRSA, NIH, and SAMHSA

are funded through the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and

Related Agencies (Labor-HHS-ED) appropriations act. Funding for ATSDR and IHS is provided

through the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies

(Interior/Environment) appropriations act. FDA gets its funding through the Agriculture, Rural

Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies (Agriculture) appropriations

act.8

The economic stimulus package enacted in February 2009—the American Reinvestment and

Recovery Act (ARRA)—provided a total of $15.1 billion in supplemental FY2009 discretionary

appropriations to five of the PHS agencies.9 Details of the allocation of those funds are provided

in Appendix A. Almost all of the ARRA appropriations were designated as two-year funds,

available for obligation through the end of FY2010.

Transfers

The annual Labor-HHS-ED appropriations act gives the HHS Secretary limited authority to

transfer funds from one budget account to another within the department. The Secretary may

transfer up to 1% of the funds in any given account. However, a recipient account may not be

increased by more than 3%. Congressional appropriators must be notified in advance of any

transfer.10

SSA Title V, 42 U.S.C. §§701 et seq.

25 U.S.C. §§1601 et seq.

42 U.S.C. §9604(i).

Budget authority is the authority provided in federal law to incur financial obligations that will result in expenditures,

or outlays, of federal funds. Such obligations include contracts for the purchase of supplies and services, liabilities for

salaries and wages, and grant awards. Appropriations are the most common form of budget authority. Discretionary

budget authority represents funding that is provided in and controlled by the annual appropriations acts.

For an overview of each of these three appropriations acts, see CRS Report R43967, Labor, Health and Human

Services, and Education: FY2015 Appropriations, coordinated by (name redacted); CRS Report R43617, Interior,

Environment, and Related Agencies: FY2015 Appropriations, by (name redacted)

; and CRS Report R43669,

Agriculture and Related Agencies: FY2015 Appropriations, coordinated by (name redacted)

P.L. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115. The PHS agency appropriations were included in Title VII (Interior/Environment) and Title

VIII (Labor-HHS-ED) of Division A of ARRA. In addition to these discretionary appropriations, ARRA included

several HHS mandatory spending provisions. For example, ARRA temporarily increased federal payments to states

under the Medicaid and the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) programs. ARRA also incorporated the

Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, which established multibillion dollar

incentive programs under Medicare and Medicaid to encourage hospitals and physicians to adopt and use interoperable

electronic health record technology. For more information, see, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L.

111-5): Summary and Legislative History, by (name redacted) et al.

The HHS Secretary’s FY2015 transfer authority was provided in Section 206 of the FY2015 Labor-HHS-ED

appropriations act (P.L. 113-235, Division G).

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

The HHS Secretary used this transfer authority in FY2013 and again in FY2014 as part of a

broader effort to provide the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) with additional

funding to implement the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In FY2013, for example, NIH was the

primary source of transfers both to CMS for ACA implementation and to CDC and SAMHSA to

help offset a loss of funding for those two agencies from the ACA’s Prevention and Public Health

Fund (PPHF). A significant portion of the FY2013 PPHF funds that were originally allocated to

CDC and SAMHSA were reallocated to CMS for ACA implementation. In FY2014, NIH was

again the primary source of transfers to CMS to support ACA implementation.11

PHS Program Evaluation Set-Aside

In addition to the transfer authority provided in the annual Labor-HHS-ED appropriations act,

Section 241 of the PHSA authorizes the HHS Secretary, with the approval of congressional

appropriators, to use a portion of the funds appropriated for programs authorized by the PHSA to

evaluate their implementation and effectiveness. This long-standing budgeting authority is known

as the PHS Program Evaluation Set-Aside (set-aside), or PHS budget “tap.”

Under this authority the appropriations of a number of HHS agencies and offices are subject to an

assessment. Although the PHSA limits the set-aside to no more than 1% of program

appropriations, in recent years the annual Labor-HHS-ED appropriations act has specified a

higher amount. The FY2015 Labor-HHS-ED appropriations act capped the set-aside at 2.5%.12

Following passage of the annual Labor-HHS-ED appropriations act, the HHS Budget Office

calculates the assessment on each of the donor agencies and offices. These funds are then

transferred to various recipient agencies and offices within the department for evaluation and

other specified purposes, based on the amounts specified in the appropriations act.13

Table 1 shows the total assessments and transfers for FY2013, by HHS agency and office, and

indicates whether the entity was a net donor or recipient of set-aside funds that year. NIH, whose

annual discretionary appropriation exceeds that of all the other PHS agencies combined, is subject

to the largest assessment of set-aside funds. NIH contributed almost $710 million (69%) of the

$1.026 billion in set-aside funds in FY2013. The agency received $8 million in set-aside funding,

making it a significant net donor of such funds. Similarly, HRSA contributed more set-aside funds

than it received in FY2013. On the other hand, AHRQ, CDC, and SAMHSA each were net

recipients of set-aside funding in FY2013. The Administration for Children and Families (ACF)

and the Office of the Secretary (OS) also received set-aside funds.

The FY2013 assessments and transfers of set-aside funding shown in Table 1 are broadly

representative of the distribution of such funds during each of the preceding fiscal years

extending back to the mid-2000s. In FY2014, the allocation of set-aside funding was comparable

For more discussion of ACA implementation funding, see, Federal Funding for Health Insurance Exchanges, by

(name redacted) and (name redacted).

P.L. 113-235, Division G, Section 205; 128 Stat. 2485. Note: The President’s FY2016 budget proposed increasing

the maximum amount of set-aside funds to 3.0%.

Only funds appropriated for activities and programs authorized by the PHSA are subject to an assessment. Thus,

most of the funds appropriated for CDC, HRSA, NIH, and SAMHSA are assessed. The annual Labor-HHS-ED

appropriations act excludes some funding from the set-aside; still other funding is excluded by convention. For

example, funds appropriated for HHS block grants targeting prevention, substance abuse, and mental health as well as

funds for program management activities and for buildings and facilities are typically excluded from the set-aside.

Funding for agencies (e.g., ATSDR, FDA, IHS) and programs (e.g., HRSA’s maternal and child health block grant)

that are not authorized by the PHSA are also excluded.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

to that of FY2013 but with one key difference. For the first time, CMS was a recipient of setaside funds.14

In FY2015, congressional appropriators made substantial changes to the allocation of set-aside

funds by transferring most of the funding to NIH and eliminating any transfers to AHRQ, CDC,

and HRSA. As shown in Table 1, NIH went from being by far the largest net donor of set-aside

funds to a net recipient of such funding in FY2015. Meanwhile, AHRQ and CDC experienced a

significant net loss of set-aside funding in FY2015. The situation with AHRQ is of particular

interest. From FY2003 through FY2014, AHRQ did not receive an annual discretionary

appropriation. The agency was supported by set-aside funds and, in recent years, by smaller

amounts from other sources. In FY2015, however, AHRQ received a discretionary appropriation

for the first time in more than a decade in lieu of receiving any set-aside funding.

Table 1. PHS Evaluation Set-Aside Fund Assessments and Transfers in FY2013

and FY2015

Dollars in Thousands

FY2013

Agency/

Office

Total

Assessments

NIH

FY2015

Total

Transfers

Net Gain

(Loss)

Total

Assessments

Total

Transfers

Net Gain

(Loss)

709,536

8,200

(701,336)

688,604

715,000

26,396

HRSA

126,340

25,000

(101,340)

209,583

—

(209,583)

CDC

116,170

375,048

258,878

148,884

—

(148,884)

SAMHSA

53,867

129,667

75,800

29,337

133,667

104,330

AHRQ

365,362

365,284

7,340

—

(7,340)

CMS

—

196,000

ACF

—

5,762

5762

—

ACL

158

—

(158)

590

—

(590)

19,412

116,522

97,110

27,657

67,328

39,671

Total

1,025,561

1,111,995

Sources: Department of Health and Human Services, “Use of Public Health Service Set-Aside Authority for

Fiscal Year 2013,” Report to Congress; and Department of Health and Human Services, “Use of Public Health

Services Set-Aside Authority for Fiscal Year 2015,” Report to Congress.

Mandatory Funding, User Fees, and Collections

Although the bulk of PHS agency funding is provided through annual discretionary

appropriations, agencies also receive mandatory funding, user fees, and third-party collections.15

As discussed briefly below, these additional sources of funding are a substantial component of the

budget of several PHS agencies.

Complete details of the FY2014 set-aside fund assessments and transfers are not publicly available.

Mandatory spending, also known as direct spending, refers to outlays from budget authority that is provided in laws

other than annual appropriations acts. Mandatory spending includes spending on entitlement programs.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Mandatory Appropriations

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)16 included numerous appropriations that

together are providing billions of dollars in mandatory spending to support new and existing grant

programs and other activities.17 Some of the ACA appropriations fund specific programs and

activities within the PHS agencies. These appropriations are itemized in the funding tables in this

report.

The ACA also established three multibillion dollar trust funds to help support PHS agency

programs and activities. First, the Community Health Center Fund (CHCF), for which the

ACA provided a total of $11 billion in annual appropriations over the five-year period FY2011FY2015, is supporting the federal health centers program and the National Health Service Corps

(NHSC), both administered by HRSA.18 A table summarizing each fiscal year’s CHCF

appropriation and the allocation of funds appears in Appendix B.19

Second, the Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF), for which the ACA provided a

permanent annual appropriation, is intended to support prevention, wellness, and other public

health programs and activities.20 To date, CDC has received the majority of PPHF funds, while

AHRQ, HRSA, and SAMHSA have received smaller amounts. The HHS Secretary transferred

almost half of the FY2013 PPHF funds to CMS to support ACA implementation. A broader

analysis of the allocation of PPHF funding is provided in Appendix C.

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF) is supporting comparative

effectiveness research over a 10-year period (FY2010-FY2019) with a mix of appropriations—

some of which are offset by revenue from a fee imposed on health insurance policies and selfinsured health plans—and transfers from the Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds.21 A portion

of the PCORTF is allocated for AHRQ. More information on the PCORTF, including the

appropriation and transfer formulas, is provided in Appendix D.

In addition to the ACA funding, HRSA, CDC, and IHS each receive mandatory funds from other

sources. HRSA’s Family-to-Family Health Information Centers Program has been funded by a

series of mandatory appropriations since FY2007; CDC receives Medicaid funding to support the

Vaccines for Children program; and both IHS and NIH receive mandatory funds for diabetes

programs. These and other mandatory appropriations are itemized in the agency funding tables in

this report.

The ACA was signed into law on March 23, 2010 (P.L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119). On March 30, 2010, the President

signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA; P.L. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029), which included

several new health reform provisions and amended numerous provisions in the ACA. Several subsequently enacted

bills made additional changes to selected ACA provisions. All references to the ACA in this report refer collectively to

the law and to the changes made by HCERA and subsequent legislation.

For a complete list and discussion of all the appropriations in the ACA, including details of the obligation of these

funds, see CRS Report R41301, Appropriations and Fund Transfers in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), by (name redac

ted)

ACA Section 10503(a)-(b).

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA; P.L. 114-10, 129 Stat. 87) appropriated two

more years of funding for the CHCF—a total of $3.910 billion for each of FY2016 and FY2017—to support health

center operations and the NHSC.

ACA Section 4002.

ACA Section 6301(d)-(e).

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

User Fees

Several PHS agencies assess user fees on third parties to help fund their programs and activities.

User fees collected by CDC, HRSA, and SAMHSA represent a very small portion of each

agency’s overall budget.22 In comparison, the industry user fees that FDA collects help finance a

broad range of the agency’s regulatory activities and account for a substantial and growing share

of the agency’s budget.

It has been almost 25 years since the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA)23 established the

first user fee program at FDA. Since PDUFA’s enactment, Congress has created several other

FDA user fee programs. These programs provide FDA with additional resources that allow it to

hire more personnel and expedite the process of reviewing new product applications. Some user

fees also pay for information technology infrastructure and post-approval regulation of safety and

effectiveness. FDA’s user fee programs now support the agency’s regulation of prescription drugs,

animal drugs, medical devices, tobacco products, and foods, among other activities. The amount

of user fees that FDA collects under these programs has increased steadily since PDUFA was

enacted, both in absolute terms and as a share of FDA’s overall budget. In FY2015, user fees

accounted for 42% of the FDA’s overall budget. More discussion of user fees is provided in the

FDA section of this report and in Appendix E.

Collections

IHS supplements its annual discretionary appropriation with third-party collections from public

and private payers. Most of these funds come from Medicare and Medicaid, which reimburse IHS

for services provided to American Indians and Alaska Natives enrolled in these programs at

facilities operated by IHS and the tribes. IHS also collects reimbursements from private health

insurers. IHS collections (and reimbursements) are reflected in Table 7 of this report.

Recent Trends in PHS Agency Funding

Congress has taken a number of recent steps through both the annual appropriations process and

the enactment of deficit-reduction legislation to reduce the growth in federal spending. These

actions, which are briefly discussed below, have helped reduce discretionary funding for several

PHS agencies over the past six years (i.e., FY2010-FY2015). Among the five PHS agencies that

are funded through the Labor-HHS-ED appropriations act, only SAMHSA received funding in

FY2015 that was essentially level with the amount it received in FY2010. CDC, HRSA, and NIH

each received a smaller discretionary appropriation in FY2015 than they had received in FY2010.

Similarly, AHRQ’s discretionary appropriation in FY2015 was less than the amount of set-aside

funding the agency received in FY2010. With the exception of NIH, which is funded almost

entirely by discretionary appropriations, the decline in discretionary funding for the other three

agencies (i.e., AHRQ, CDC, and HRSA) has been offset by the receipt of mandatory ACA funds.

FDA and IHS, neither of which receives discretionary funding through the Labor-HHS-ED

appropriation act, have seen their appropriations increase over the six-year period FY2010FY2015. Both agencies have also witnessed a steady increase in funding from other sources; user

fees at FDA, and third-party collections at IHS.

These user fees are listed in the agency-specific tables in this report.

P.L. 102-571, 106 Stat. 4491.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Impact of Budget Caps and Sequestration

In April 2011, lawmakers agreed to cuts in discretionary spending for a broad range of agencies

and programs as part of negotiations to complete the FY2011 appropriations process and avert a

government shutdown. Congress and the President then enacted the Budget Control Act of 2011

(BCA),24 which amended the Balance Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

(BBEDCA).25 The BCA established enforceable discretionary spending limits, or caps, for

defense and nondefense spending for each of FY2012 through FY2021 and triggered annual

spending reductions, equally divided between defense and nondefense spending, beginning in

FY2013. Within each spending category the cuts are divided proportionately between

discretionary spending and nonexempt mandatory spending. All the spending summarized in this

report falls within the nondefense category.

Under the BCA, the spending reductions are achieved through a combination of sequestration

(i.e., an across-the-board cancellation of budgetary resources) and lowering the BCA-imposed

discretionary spending caps. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is responsible for

calculating the percentages and amounts by which mandatory and discretionary spending are

required to be reduced each year, and for applying the BBEDCA’s sequestration exemptions and

special rules.

Mandatory Spending

The BCA requires the mandatory spending reductions to be executed each year by a sequestration

of all nonexempt accounts. Generally, the ACA and other mandatory funding discussed in this

report is fully sequestrable at the applicable percentage rate for nonexempt nondefense mandatory

spending (see Table 2), with the following key exceptions. First, the funds for the CDCadministered Vaccines for Children program come from Medicaid, which is exempt from

sequestration. Second, funding for the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation

Program Act (EEOICPA) also is exempt from sequestration. Third, under the sequestration

special rules, cuts in CHCF funding for community health centers and migrant health centers and

the cuts in mandatory diabetes funding for IHS are capped at 2% (see Table 2).

While all the nonexempt PHS programs with mandatory funding were sequestered in FY2013 and

FY2014, several of them avoided sequestration in FY2015 and/or FY2016 because there were no

budgetary resources at the time the sequestration was ordered by the President. The Maternal,

Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program, administered by HRSA, is one example of

this anomaly. The ACA authorized the Home Visiting program and funded it through FY2014

(see Table 6). Pursuant to the BCA, the President ordered the FY2015 sequestration on March 10,

2014, the day the FY2015 budget was released. But Congress and the President had yet to enact

legislation extending funding for the Home Visiting program, so there were no FY2015 budgetary

resources to sequester.26

P.L. 112-25, 125 Stat. 240. For more information, see CRS Report R41965, The Budget Control Act of 2011, by (name

redacted), (name redacted), and (name redacted)

, and CRS Report R42949, The American Taxpayer Relief Act of

2012: Modifications to the Budget Enforcement Procedures in the Budget Control Act, by (name redacted)

P.L. 99-177; Title II, 99 Stat. 1038.

While a full accounting of this anomaly is beyond the scope of this report, the following programs listed in the tables

in the report were not sequestered in the years indicated in parentheses because there were no budgetary resources at

the time the sequestration was ordered: (1) CHCF – health centers, NHSC (FY2016); (2) Maternal, Infant, and Early

Childhood Home Visiting program (FY2015, FY2016); (3) Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education

program (FY2016); (4) Family-to-Family Information Centers (FY2014, FY2015, FY2016); and (5) IHS and NIH

(continued...)

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Discretionary Spending

Under the BCA, FY2013 discretionary spending was subject to sequestration. In general, PHS

agency discretionary appropriations for that year were fully sequestrable at the applicable

percentage rate for nonexempt nondefense discretionary (NDD) spending (see Table 2). As a

result, each agency saw a dip in its discretionary funding for FY2013. OMB also determined that

FDA user fees for FY2013 were fully sequestrable at the NDD percentage rate. But it concluded

that IHS’s third-party collections in FY2013 were exempt from sequestration.

Table 2. Sequestration of Funding for PHS Agency Programs

FY2013-FY2016

Percent Reduction

Program

FY2013

FY2014

FY2015

FY2016

Nonexempt programs

5.1%a

7.2%

7.3%

6.8%

Community health centers, migrant health centers, IHS

2.0%

5.0%a

NAb

Mandatory Spending

Discretionary Spending

Nonexempt programs

Sources: OMB Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Sequestration for Fiscal Year 2013, March 1,

2013; OMB Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2014, May 20, 2013;

OMB Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2015, March 10, 2014; OMB

Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2016.

a. These percentages reflect adjustments made by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA; P.L. 112240), which amended the BCA by reducing the overall dollar amount that needed to be cut from FY2013

spending.

b. NA = not applicable.

For each of the remaining years (i.e., FY2014 through FY2021), the annual reductions in

discretionary spending required under the BCA are achieved by lowering the discretionary

spending caps by the total dollar amount of the required reduction. This means that congressional

appropriators get to decide how to apportion the cuts within the lowered spending cap rather than

having the cuts applied across-the-board to all nonexempt accounts through the sequestration

process.

For FY2014, OMB lowered the NDD spending cap by about $37 billion. However, the Bipartisan

Budget Act of 2013 (BBA)27 subsequently amended the BCA by establishing new NDD spending

caps for FY2014 and FY2015 and eliminating the BCA requirement that these caps be lowered.

This gave congressional appropriators more funding for those two fiscal years.

The BBA set the FY2014 cap for NDD spending at $491.773 billion. That level was about $22

billion above the BCA-lowered FY2014 cap that it replaced and almost $24 billion above the

FY2013 post-sequestration NDD funding level. The BBA’s FY2015 NDD spending cap of

$492.356 billion is only slightly higher than the FY2014 cap, but it is approximately $9 billion

above the BCA-lowered FY2015 cap that it replaces.

(...continued)

mandatory diabetes funding (FY2015, FY2016).

P.L. 113-67, Division A; 127 Stat. 1165.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

In FY2016, discretionary spending levels are once again subject to the original requirements of

the BCA. The law set the FY2016 cap for NDD spending at $530.000 billion, which OMB has

lowered to $493.491 billion pursuant to the BCA.28

Report Roadmap

The remainder of this report consists of seven sections, one for each PHS agency beginning with

AHRQ.29 Each section includes an overview of the agency’s statutory authority and principal

activities, and a brief summary of the agency’s funding over the period FY2010-FY2015. This

material is accompanied by a detailed funding table showing the FY2010-FY2015 funding levels

and the FY2016 budget request for the agency. The amounts in the funding tables in this report

are taken from the departmental and agency budget documents submitted to the appropriations

committees, as well as agency operating plans.30 Specific documents are listed in the source note

under each table.

The funding tables are formatted in a similar, though not identical, manner. The formatting

generally matches the way in which each agency’s funding is presented in the congressional

budget documents. Each table shows the funding for all the agency’s budget accounts and,

typically, for selected programs and activities within those accounts. These amounts are summed

to give the agency’s total, or program level, funding. At the bottom of the table any user fees, setaside funds, ACA funds, and other nondiscretionary amounts are subtracted from the program

level to give the agency’s discretionary budget authority (i.e., annual discretionary

appropriations).

The tables for AHRQ, CDC, HRSA, and SAMHSA include non-add entries—italicized and in

parentheses—to indicate the contribution of funding from sources other than the agency’s

discretionary appropriations to specific accounts. Almost all of the CDC accounts are funded with

discretionary appropriations plus amounts from multiple other sources (see Table 4).

The use of a dash in the funding tables generally means “not applicable.” Either the activity or

program was not authorized or there was no mandatory funding provided for that fiscal year. In

contrast, a zero usually indicates that congressional appropriators had chosen not to appropriate

any discretionary funds that year or, in the case of the FY2016 budget request, that no

discretionary funding was requested.

It is important to keep in mind that the PHS agency funding tables that appear in budget

documents and appropriations committee reports, as well as the tables in this report, show only

the amount of evaluation set-aside funds received. They do not reflect the amount of funding

assessed on agency accounts. As a result, the funding tables for the PHS agencies subject to an

assessment (i.e., CDC, HRSA, NIH, and SAMHSA) give a somewhat distorted view of their

available budgetary resources. This effect is particularly significant in the case of NIH. As

mentioned earlier, NIH is assessed approximately $700 million annually, and until FY2015 the

agency received $8 million each year in set-aside transfers. While the funding table for NIH

shows receipt of set-aside funds, which count towards the agency’s overall program level

Office of Management and Budget, OMB Sequestration Preview Report to the President and Congress for Fiscal

Year 2016, February 2, 2015, https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/legislative_reports/

sequestration/2016_sequestration_preview_report_president.pdf.

ATSDR and its budget are included in the discussion of CDC.

All the budget documents and operating plans are available at http://www.hhs.gov/budget/.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

funding, the amounts shown for each agency account have not been reduced to reflect the

assessment. Thus, NIH appears to have about $700 million more than is in fact the case.

Note that the funding tables show the post-sequestration amounts for the accounts that were

subject to sequestration in FY2013-FY2015. The amounts shown for the FY2016 request do not

reflect sequestration.

Congress has yet to complete work on any of the regular appropriations bills for FY2016, which began on

October 1, 2015. On September 30, the President signed the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 11453). The measure provides continuing appropriations through December 11, 2016. It funds discretionary

programs at the same rate (and under the same conditions) as in FY2015, minus an across-the-board

reduction of 0.2108%. For entitlement and other mandatory spending that is funded through appropriation

acts, P.L. 114-53 provides funding to maintain program levels under current law. This report will be updated

with information on PHS agency funding for FY2016 once legislative action on appropriations for the new

fiscal year is completed.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

(AHRQ)31

Agency Overview

AHRQ supports research designed to improve the quality of health care, increase the efficiency of

its delivery, and broaden access to health services. Specific research efforts are aimed at reducing

the costs of care, promoting patient safety, measuring the quality of health care, and improving

health care services, organization, and financing. AHRQ also is required to disseminate its

research findings to health care providers, payers, and consumers, among others. In addition, the

agency collects data on health care expenditures and utilization through the Medical Expenditure

Panel Survey (MEPS) and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP).

AHRQ has evolved from a succession of

agencies concerned with fostering health

For more information

services research and health care technology

CRS Report R44136, The Agency for Healthcare Research

and Quality (AHRQ) Budget: Fact Sheet, by (name reda

assessment. The Omnibus Budget

cted) .

Reconciliation Act of 1989 (P.L. 101-239)

added a new PHSA Title IX and established

the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), a successor agency to the former

National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment

(NCHSR). AHCPR was reauthorized in 1992 (P.L. 102-410). On December 6, 1999, President

Clinton signed the Healthcare Research and Quality Act of 1999 (P.L. 106-129), which renamed

AHCPR as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and reauthorized

appropriations for its programs and activities through FY2005.32 Congress has yet to reauthorize

the agency’s funding. Despite the expired authorization of appropriations, AHRQ continues to get

annual funding.

The AHRQ budget is organized according to three program areas: (1) Healthcare Costs, Quality

and Outcomes (HCQO) Research; (2) MEPS; and (3) program support. HCQO research focuses

on six priority areas, summarized in the text box below.

Healthcare Costs, Quality and Outcomes (HCQO) Research Areas

Health Information Technology (HIT). Research evaluating HIT and its impact on the quality and efficiency of

health care.

Patient Safety. Research on reducing and preventing medical errors, with a focus on health care-associated

infections (HAIs).

Patient-Centered Health. Research comparing the effectiveness of different treatment options (previously

referred to as comparative effectiveness research).

Health Services Research, Data, and Dissemination. Research on quality of health care that spans multiple

priority areas including, for example, the annual National Healthcare Quality and National Healthcare Disparities

Reports.

Value. Research and projects supporting value in health care, focusing on reducing cost and improving quality.

Prevention/Care Management. Research on improving the delivery of primary care and preventive services.

This section was written by (name redacted), Specialist in Health Policy.

See the AHRQ website at http://www.ahrq.gov.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

From FY2003 through FY2014, AHRQ did not receive its own annual discretionary

appropriation. Instead, the agency largely relied on the PHS evaluation set-aside to fund its

activities and programs. In recent years AHRQ also has received mandatory funds from the PPHF

and the PCORTF (see Appendix C and Appendix D). In FY2015, AHRQ received its own

discretionary appropriation for the first time in more than a decade in lieu of any set-aside

funding.

Agency Funding Since FY2010

AHRQ’s program level has increased steadily over the past several years with decreases in

discretionary funding being more than offset by transfers of ACA mandatory funds (see Table 3).

Specifically, since FY2010, the agency’s budget has increased by $62 million, and transfers

mostly from PCORTF have more than offset decreases in PHS evaluation set-aside dollars.

Although the majority of agency funding came from PHS evaluation set-aside dollars during this

period—and an agency-specific discretionary appropriation in FY2015—funding from PCORTF

has also grown considerably from $8 million in FY2011 to $101 million in FY2015.

Congressional Research Service

Table 3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Program or Activity

Health Costs, Quality and Outcomes (HCQO) Research

Health Information Technology Research

Patient Safety Research

Patient-Centered Health Researcha

PCORTF Transfer (non-add)a

PCORTF Transfera

Health Services Research, Data, and Disseminationb

Value

Prevention/Care Management

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS)

Program Support

Total, Program Level

Less Funds From Other Sources

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside

PCORTF Transfers

PPHF Transfers

Total, Discretionary Budget Authority

2010

276

—

112

(6)

403

2011

266

(8)

—

112

(12)

392

2012

272

(24)

—

108

(12)

405

2013

300

(58)

—

111

(6)

429

2014

304

—

111

(7)

436

2015

330

—

101

112

—

465

2016

Request

339

—

116

112

—

479

397

—

372

369

365

364

101

—

364

116

—

276

Sources: Funding amounts for FY2010 and FY2011 are taken from AHRQ’s FY2012 and FY2013 congressional budget justification documents. Funding amounts for

FY2012 and FY2013 are taken from AHRQ’s Sequestration Operating Plan for FY2013. Funding amounts for FY2014 and FY2015 are taken from the FY2016 HHS Budget

in Brief and the FY2015 congressional budget justification. The funding amounts for the FY2016 President’s Request are taken from the FY2016 HHS Budget in Brief. All

these documents are available at http://www.hhs.gov/budget/.

Notes: Individual amounts may not add to subtotals or totals due to rounding.

a. AHRQ receives funds transferred from the PCORTF to carry out PHSA Section 937, which requires the dissemination of the results of patient-centered outcomes

research carried out by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and other “government-funded research relevant to comparative clinical

effectiveness research.” For FY2011-FY2013, the PCORTF transfer supplemented the agency’s set-aside funding for its patient-centered health research program.

Since FY2014, however, AHRQ’s patient-centered health research program has been entirely funded by the PCORTF transfer, which is now shown as its own

separate budget line. AHRQ’s budget documents no longer list patient-centered health research as a separate program area.

b. Formerly “Crosscutting Activities;” also formerly “Research Innovations.”

CRS-13

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)33

Agency Overview

According to CDC, its mission is “to protect America from health, safety and security threats,

both foreign and in the [United States].”34 CDC is organized into a number of centers, institutes,

and offices, some focused on specific public health challenges (e.g., injury prevention), others

focused on general public health capabilities (e.g., surveillance and laboratory services).35 In

addition, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) is headed by the CDC

Director and is discussed in this section.

Many CDC activities are not specifically authorized but are based in broad, permanent authorities

in the PHSA.36 Four CDC operating divisions are explicitly authorized. The National Institute for

Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was permanently authorized by the Occupational

Safety and Health Act of 1970.37 The National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental

Disabilities (NCBDDD) was established in PHSA Section 317C by the Children’s Health Act of

2000.38 The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) was established in PHSA Section 306

by the Health Services Research, Health Statistics, and Medical Libraries Act of 1974.39 ATSDR

was established by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

of 1980 (CERCLA, the “Superfund” law).40 Authorizations of appropriations for NCBDDD,

NCHS, and ATSDR have expired, but the programs continue to receive annual appropriations.

CDC provides about $5 billion per year in grants to state, local, municipal, tribal, and foreign

governments, and to academic and non-profit entities.41 It has few regulatory responsibilities.

Table 4 presents funding levels for CDC programs for FY2010 through the FY2016 request. In

addition to annual discretionary appropriations, program level amounts for recent years include

funds from the following four mandatory appropriations: (1) the Vaccines for Children (VFC)

program;42 (2) NIOSH activities to support the Energy Employees Occupational Illness

Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA);43 (3) the World Trade Center (WTC) Health Program;44

and (4) appropriations provided under ACA, principally through the PPHF.45 CDC also receives

annual set-aside funds and authorized user fees, and may also receive funding through

supplemental appropriations and other transfers.

This section was written by (name redacted), Specialist in Public Health and Epidemiology.

See the CDC website at http://www.cdc.gov/about/organization/mission.htm.

Information about CDC’s organization is available at http://www.cdc.gov/about/organization/cio.htm.

For example, PHSA Section 301 authorizes the Secretary of HHS to conduct research and investigations as necessary

to control disease, and Section 317 authorizes the Secretary to award grants to states for preventive health programs.

29 U.S.C. §671.

42 U.S.C. §247b-4.

42 U.S.C. §242k.

42 U.S.C. §9604(i).

See CDC, Procurements and Grants, http://www.cdc.gov/about/business/funding.htm.

See CDC, Vaccines for Children Program, http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/index.html.

See CDC, EEOICPA, “Frequently Asked Questions,” http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas/faqsact.html.

See CDC, World Trade Center Health Program, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/wtc/.

CRS Report R41301, Appropriations and Fund Transfers in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), by (name redacted)

See more information about the PPHF in Appendix C of this report.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Agency Funding Since FY2010

Compared with FY2010, CDC’s budget authority for FY2015 is lower, and its program level is

higher (see Table 4). Two of CDC’s mandatory funding sources—ACA funding, principally from

the PPHF, and the WTC Health Program—have, in whole or part, replaced discretionary funding

for some ongoing activities.

Both budget authority and program level reached their lowest points since FY2010 in FY2013, a

result of sequestration of most mandatory and discretionary funds, and redirection of some PPHF

funds to ACA implementation (see Appendix C). VFC and EEOICPA funds are exempt from

sequestration. The PPHF and WTC Health Program are not, and sequestration of these mandatory

funds has continued each fiscal year since FY2013.

In 2014 CDC implemented the “Working Capital Fund,” a revolving fund to be used by agency

programs to pay for agency-wide business services—such as procurement and human

resources—that received direct appropriations in the past.46 CDC now applies certain business

services funds previously assigned to the Cross-cutting Activities and Program Support account to

the programmatic accounts instead. Although this does not change the amount of funds available

to the agency, it has the effect of increasing the amounts budgeted to programmatic accounts.

CDC has adjusted its accounting from FY2012 forward to make budget lines comparable from

year to year. Of note, Table 4 reflects this adjustment, such that amounts presented for FY2012

and later years are not necessarily comparable to amounts presented for FY2010 and FY2011.

In December 2014 Congress provided $1.771 billion in FY2015 emergency supplemental

appropriations to CDC for response to the Ebola outbreak. The funds, which are available through

FY2019, are to be used for both domestic and international activities. CDC has not yet presented

these funds within its general budget, and they are not presented in Table 4. More information is

available on the CDC website.47

See CDC, “Working Capital Fund,” http://www.cdc.gov/fmo/topic/wcf/index.html.

CDC, “FY2015 Ebola Response Funding,” http://www.cdc.gov/fmo/topic/Budget%20Information/index.html.

Congressional Research Service

Table 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Program or Activity

2010

2011

2012

2013a

2014

2016

Request

2015

Immunization and Respiratory Diseases

721

748

815

718

783

798

748

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

(13)

(0)

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(0)

(100)

(190)

(91)

(160)

(210)

PHSSEF Transfer (non-add)

—

(156)

—

(12)

—

(15)

—

Vaccines for Childrenb

3,761

3,953

4,006

3,607

3,557

3,981

4,109

HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STI and TB

1,119

1,116

1,163

1,095

1,118

1,162

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

(0)

(4)

(0)

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(30)

(0)

(10)

(0)

281

304

362

341

390

405

699

(20)

(52)

(44)

(52)

(55)

924

1,075

1,211

1,003

1,186

1,198

1,058

(59)

(301)

(411)

(233)

(446)

(451)

(480)

144

136

142

134

129

132

(0)

(68)

181

170

158

142

179

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(0)

(35)

(21)

(13)

(37)

Injury Prevention and Control

149

144

146

139

150

170

257

Public Health Scientific Services

441

468

517

493

481

539

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

(248)

(86)

(0)

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(32)

(72)

(70)

(52)

(0)

(64)

Occupational Safety and Health

375

316

325

323

332

335

283

(92)

(111)

(112)

(0)

354

340

377

363

416

447

448

Emerging & Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

Birth Defects, Developmental Disabilities, Disability and Health

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

Environmental Health

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

Global Health

CRS-16

Program or Activity

2010

2011

2012

2013a

2014

2016

Request

2015

Supplemental Ebola funds (non-add)c

—

Public Health Preparedness and Response

1,522

1,415

1,382

1,279

1,368

1,353

1,382

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(0)

(10)

(0)

PHSSEF Transfer (non-add)

—

(69)

(30)

—

661

605

236

227

275

274

114

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(50)

(41)

(23)

(160)

(0)

Prevention Block Grant (non-add)

(100)

(80)

(75)

(160)

(0)

Buildings and Facilities

Childhood Obesity (ACA Sec. 4306)e

—

User Fees

EEOICPA (NIOSH mandatory)

World Trade Center Health Program (NIOSH mandatory)f

—

188

231

236

243

268

ATSDR

Medical Monitoring (ATSDR/ACA Sec. 10323(b))

—

10,884

10,995

11,187

10,243

10,750

11,269

11,519

3,761

3,953

4,006

3,607

3,557

3,981

4,109

EEOICPA

PHSSEF Transfers

—

225

—

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside

352

371

375

211

ACA Mandatory Funds: PPHF Transfers

192

611

809

463

831

886

914

ACA Mandatory Funds: Other

—

World Trade Center Health Program

—

188

231

236

243

268

User Fees

6,474

5,726

5,725

5,503

5,864

6,073

6,172

Crosscutting Activities and Program Supportd

Total, CDC/ATSDR Program Level

Less Funds From Other Sources

Vaccines for Childrenb

Total, CDC/ATSDR Discretionary BA

Less ATSDR (discretionary BA)

CRS-17

Program or Activity

Total, CDC Discretionary BA

2010

6,397

2011

5,649

2012

5,649

2013a

5,430

2014

5,788

2015

5,998

2016

Request

6,096

Sources: CDC and ATSDR congressional budget justifications and related documents for FY2012 through FY2016, http://www.cdc.gov/fmo.

Notes: Individual amounts may not add to subtotals or totals due to rounding.

Mandatory amounts displayed for FY2013 through FY2015 reflect sequestration as required for non-defense mandatory spending.

BA and program level amounts for FY2012 and subsequent fiscal years reflect a realignment of funds from certain business services in the Cross-cutting Activities and

Program Support account into most other accounts, in order to implement the Working Capital Fund, discussed in the text of this report. As a result, amounts for these

years are not necessarily comparable to amounts for previous years.

PHSSEF is Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund, a fund used by appropriators to provide the Secretary with ongoing or one-time emergency funding, such as

for the response to influenza epidemics. STI is sexually transmitted infection. EEOICPA is Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act.

a. Amounts for FY2013 include a transfer of $79 million from other HHS agencies, pursuant to the Secretary’s transfer authority (see discussion under “Transfers”).

b. The Vaccines for Children (VFC) program provides free pediatric vaccines to doctors who serve eligible (generally low-income) children. VFC is funded entirely as

an entitlement through federal Medicaid appropriations and is exempt from sequestration. Amounts for FY2014 through the FY2016 request are estimates.

c. Amounts include $30 million for FY2015 for the response to the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa (P.L. 113-164). Amounts do not include subsequent

supplemental FY2015 funding for response to the outbreak provided in P.L. 113-235. These funds are discussed in CRS Report R43807, FY2015 Funding to Counter

Ebola and the Islamic State (IS), coordinated by (name redacted); and at CDC, “FY2015 Ebola Response Funding,” http://www.cdc.gov/fmo/topic/

Budget%20Information/index.html.

d. For the purposes of this table, Cross-cutting Activities and Program Support excludes amounts for Buildings and Facilities, which are displayed in a separate row.

Amounts for FY2010 include amounts previously designated as Public Health Leadership and Support, Business Services Support, and Preventive Health and Health

Services Block Grant.

e. ACA Section 4306 appropriated $25 million for a childhood obesity demonstration project, http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/researchproject.html. The

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA, P.L. 114-10) appropriated additional funding for the childhood obesity demonstration program;

$10 million for the two-year period FY2016 through FY2017.

Beginning July 1, 2011 (i.e., for the final quarter of FY2011), the World Trade Center Health Program, previously funded through discretionary appropriations to

NIOSH, was replaced by a mandatory program. Amounts are federal obligations only. Amounts for FY2015 and FY2016 are estimated federal obligations.

CRS-18

ACA Section 10323(b) appropriated $23 million for the period FY2010-FY2014, and $20 million for each five‐year period thereafter, in no‐year funding for the early

detection of certain medical conditions related to environmental health hazards in Libby, Montana.

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)48

Agency Overview

FDA regulates the safety of human foods, dietary supplements, cosmetics, and animal foods; and

the safety and effectiveness of human drugs, biological products (e.g., vaccines), medical devices,

radiation-emitting products, and animal drugs. In 2009, Congress gave FDA the authority to

regulate the manufacture, marketing, and distribution of tobacco products in order to protect

public health.

Seven centers within FDA represent the broad program areas for which the agency has

responsibility: the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the Center for Devices

and Radiological Health (CDRH), the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), the

Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), the Center for Veterinary Medicine

(CVM), the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), and the Center for Tobacco

Products (CTP). Several other offices have agency-wide responsibilities.

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) is the principal source of FDA’s statutory

authority.49 FDA is also responsible for administering certain provisions in other laws, most

notably the PHSA.50 Although the FDA’s authorizing committees in Congress are the committees

with jurisdiction over public health issues—the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor,

and Pensions, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce—FDA’s assignment within

the appropriations committees reflects its origin as part of the Department of Agriculture. The

Senate and House appropriations subcommittees on Agriculture, Rural Development, FDA, and

Related Agencies have jurisdiction over FDA’s budget, even though the agency has been part of

various federal health agencies (HHS and its predecessors) since 1940.

FDA’s budget has two funding streams: annual

For more information

appropriations (i.e., discretionary budget

CRS Report RL34334, The Food and Drug Administration:

Budget and Statutory History, FY1980-FY2007, coordinated

authority, or BA) and industry user fees. In

by (name redacted) .

FDA’s annual appropriation, Congress sets

CRS Report R41983, How FDA Approves Drugs and

both the total amount of appropriated funds

Regulates Their Safety and Effectiveness, by (name redacted)

and the amount of user fees that the agency is

CRS

Report

R42130,

FDA

Regulation

Medical

Devices,

authorized to collect and obligate for that

(name redacted) .

fiscal year. Appropriated funds are largely for

the Salaries and Expenses account, with a

much smaller amount for the Buildings and Facilities account. The several different user fees,

which account for 42% of FDA’s total FY2015 program level, contribute only to the Salaries and

Expenses account.

The largest and oldest FDA user fee that is linked to a specific program was first authorized by

the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA, P.L. 102-571) in 1992. Appendix E presents the

authorizing legislation for current FDA user fees, sorted by the dollar amount they contribute to

the agency’s FY2015 budget. After PDUFA, Congress added user fee authorities regarding

This section was written by (name redacted), Specialist in Drug Safety and Effectiveness.

21 U.S.C. §§301 et seq.

PHSA Section 351 (21 U.S.C. §262) authorizes the regulation of biological products and states that FFDCA

requirements apply to biological products licensed under the PHSA. A listing of other laws containing provisions for

which FDA is responsible is at http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/default.htm.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

medical devices, animal drugs, animal generic drugs, tobacco products, priority review, food

reinspection, food recall, voluntary qualified food importer, generic drugs, biosimilars, and, most

recently, outsourcing facilities (related to drug compounding) and some wholesale distributors

and third-party logistics providers (related to pharmaceutical supply chain security).51 Each of the

medical product fee authorities requires reauthorization every five years. Several indefinite

authorities apply to fees for mammography inspection, color additive certification, export

certification, and priority review vouchers.52

Agency Funding Since FY2010

Between FY2010 and FY2015, FDA’s funding increased from $3.1 billion to $4.5 billion (see

Table 5). Although congressionally provided appropriations increased 10% over that period, user

fee revenue more than doubled. In FY2015, user fees account for 42% of FDA’s total funding.

Continuing funding issues for the agency include adequate resources to carry out food safety

activities (the President’s request includes a $301 million increase above the FY2015 level), the

risk of user fees’ being subject to subsequent sequestrations, and the ongoing challenge of

performing increasing congressionally directed tasks without concomitant resources increases.

CRS Report R42366, Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA): 2012 Reauthorization as PDUFA V, by (name

redacted)

; CRS Report R42508, The FDA Medical Device User Fee Program, by (name redacted) ; CRS Report R40443,

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (P.L. 111-353), coordinated by (name redacted); CRS Report R42680, The

Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA, P.L. 112-144), coordinated by (n ame redacted)

; and

CRS Report R43290, The Proposed Drug Quality and Security Act (H.R. 3204), by (name redacted)

User fees provide varying proportions of funding for several FDA programs (see Table E-1). For example, the

agency’s tobacco regulatory activities are entirely supported through user fees paid by tobacco product manufacturers

and importers, and the toxicology program receives no user fee funds. In FY2015, fees account for 64% of the human

drugs program budget, 39% of the biologics budget, 27% of the devices and radiological health budget, 15% of the

animal drugs and feeds budget, and 1% of the foods budget. Appendix E of this report presents additional detail.

Congressional Research Service

Table 5. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Program area

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Requesta

Foods

783

836

883

813

900

914

999

783

836

866

797

883

903

987

User Fees

—

Human drugs

884

950

979

1,187

1,289

1,339

1,371

462

478

439

466

482

485

User Fees

421

472

501

748

823

856

886

Biologics

291

302

329

308

338

344

350

206

212

195

211

215

User Fees

117

113

127

133

135

Animal drugs and feeds

154

159

166

155

173

175

193

134

139

138

126

142

148

166

User Fees

Devices and radiological health

370

379

376

384

428

440

452

314

322

323

296

321

328

User Fees

107

119

125

Tobacco products

136

455

459

501

532

564

—

User Fees

136

455

459

501

532

564

Toxicological research

User Fees

—

Headquarters/Commissioner’s Office

178

187

223

251

275

277

288

141

150

154

160

172

173

181

User Fees

103

104

106

CRS-21

Program area

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Requesta

GSA rent

178

205

199

220

228

238

145

151

161

150

162

169

177

User Fees

Other rent and rent-related activities

124

129

132

157

178

163

186

103

100

106

118

133

116

137

User Fees

Export and color certification funds

—

User Fees

Food and drug safety

—

46b

—

User Fees

—

Priority review vouchers

—

User Fees

—

Buildings & Facilities

22c

User Fees

—

4,731

Total, Program Level

3,118

3,339

3,832

4,031

4,387

4,505d

748

879

1,326

1,645

1,826

1,909

1,988

2,369

2,460

2,506

2,386

2,561

2,596d

2,744

Less Funds From Other Sources

User Fees

Total, Discretionary Budget Authority

Sources: Funding amounts for FY2010 and FY2011 are taken from FDA’s FY2012 and FY2013 congressional budget justification documents. Funding amounts for

FY2012 and FY2013 are taken from FDA’s FY2013 Sequestration Operating Plan; the FY2013 figures reflect sequestration. FY2014 amounts are from FDA’s FY2014

Operating Plan, issued after enactment of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014. FY2015 and FY2016 request amounts are taken from the FY2016 congressional

budget justification.

CRS-22

Notes: Consistent with the Administration and congressional committee formats, each program area includes funding designated for the responsible FDA center (e.g.,

the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research or the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition) and the portion of effort budgeted for the agency-wide Office of

Regulatory Affairs to commit to that area. It also apportions user fee revenue across the program areas as indicated in the Administration’s request (e.g., 90% of the

animal drug user fee revenue is designated for the animal drugs and feeds program, with the rest going to headquarters and Office of the Commissioner, GSA rent, and

other rent and rent-related activities categories).

a. For user fees in the Administration’s FY2016 request, this column shows only the $1,988 million in fees that have been authorized. The request included an

additional $199 million in proposed fees, allocated across several FDA program areas. With these proposed user fees, the President’s request for user fees totals

$2,187 million yielding a total program level request of $4,930 million.

b. The FY2013 Sequestration Operating Plan notes food safety and drug safety items that had not been included in the program-level appropriations.

c. The FY2010 Buildings & Facilities appropriation included about $7 million for the National Center for Natural Products Research, as directed by the Committee on

Appropriations.

d. The FY2015 Agriculture appropriations act provided an additional $25 million to FDA for Ebola response and preparedness activities. Adding this amount to the

FDA appropriations brought BA to $2,622 million and the total program level to $4,530 million for FY2015.

CRS-23

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Health Resources and Services Administration

(HRSA)53

Agency Overview

HRSA is the federal agency charged with improving access to health care for those who are

uninsured, isolated, or medically vulnerable. The agency currently awards funding to more than

3,000 grantees, including community-based organizations; colleges and universities; hospitals;

state, local, and tribal governments; and private entities to support health services projects, such

as training health care workers or providing specific health services.54 HRSA also administers the

health centers program, which provides grants to non-profit entities that provide primary care

services to people who experience financial, geographic, cultural, or other barriers to health care.

HRSA is organized into five bureaus (see text box below) and ten offices. Some offices focus on

specific populations or health care issues (e.g., Office of Women’s Health, Office of Rural Health

Policy), while others provide agency-wide support or technical assistance to HRSA’s regional

offices (e.g., Office of Planning, Analysis and Evaluation; Office of Regional Operations).55

HRSA Bureaus

The Bureau of Primary Health Care administers the Health Centers program, authorized under Title III of the

PHSA. Community and other health centers provide access to primary care for individuals who are low-income,

uninsured, or living where health care is scarce.

The Bureau of Health Workforce administers scholarship, loan and loan repayment programs that help

underserved communities recruit and retain health professionals. These programs include the National Health Service

Corps, NURSE Corps, and the Faculty Loan Repayment Program. The bureau also administers a number of programs

for health professions training and development of diversity and cultural competence in the health workforce. These

programs include the Oral Health Training Program, the Nursing Workforce Diversity Program, the Children’s

Hospitals Graduate Medical Education Program, the Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education program

funded under ACA, and the Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students Program. The Bureau of Health Professions also

administers the National Practitioner and Healthcare Integrity Protection Data Banks and the National Center for

Health Workforce Analysis. Titles III, VII, and VIII of the PHSA authorize programs in this bureau.

The Maternal and Child Health Bureau administers the Maternal and Child Health Block Grant and other

programs that support the infrastructure for maternal and child health services, including the Maternal, Infant, and

Early Childhood Home Visiting Program that was authorized and funded by ACA. These programs are authorized in

Title V of the Social Security Act (SSA). This bureau also administers Healthy Start, newborn hearing screening,

autism, and other programs authorized under Titles III, XI, XII, and XIX of the PHSA.

The HIV/AIDS Bureau administers the Ryan White HIV/AIDS program, which is the largest discretionary grant

program within HRSA and is focused on HIV/AIDS care. The Ryan White HIV/AIDS program administers grant

programs that provide early intervention, minority, and family services. It also administers the AIDS Drug Assistance

Program (ADAP). Title XXVI of the PHSA authorizes the Ryan White HIV/AIDS programs.

The Healthcare Systems Bureau provides national leadership and direction in targeted areas, such as organ and

bone marrow transplantation, poison control centers, and others. It also administers the 340B drug pricing program.

Titles III and XII of the PHSA authorize programs in this bureau.

As noted in the text box, the majority of HRSA’s programs are authorized by the PHSA or, in

some cases, by the SSA. Additionally, Section 427(e) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health

This section was written by (name redacted), Specialist in Health Services.

See HRSA’s website at http://www.hrsa.gov.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Amendments Act (P.L. 95-164) authorizes the Black Lung Program, which supports clinics that

provide services to retired coal miners and others.

Agency Funding Since FY2010

HRSA funding increased from $8.1 billion in FY2010 to $10.3 billion in FY2015 despite a

reduction in its discretionary appropriation during that time (see Table 6). Specifically,

discretionary appropriations declined by about 18%; falling from $7.5 billion to $6.1 billion.

Much of the decline in discretionary

For more information

appropriations occurred because of the loss of

CRS Report R44054, Health Resources and Services

discretionary appropriations for the National

Administration (HRSA) FY2016 Budget Request and Funding

Health Service Corps (NHSC) and the

History: Fact Sheet, by (name redacted).

elimination of the congressional earmark

CRS Report R43937, Federal Health Centers: An Overview,

program that supported health care facility

by (name redacted).

construction and renovation.

CRS Report R43920, National Health Service Corps:

Changes in Funding and Impact on Recruitment, by (name re

The overall growth in HRSA’s funding was

dacte d)

primarily driven by increasing amounts from

CRS

Report

R42428,

The Maternal and Child Health

the CHCF, which more than offset the decline

Services Block Grant: Background and Funding, by (name r

in discretionary funding. While CHCF funding edacted )

may have been intended to supplement annual

CRS Report R43177, Health Workforce Programs in Title

discretionary appropriations for the health

VII of the Public Health Service Act, by (name redacted

centers program and the NHSC, the funds

)

have partially supplanted (i.e., replaced)

CRS Report R43930, Maternal and Infant Early Childhood

Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program: Background and Funding,

discretionary health center funding and have

by (name redacted)

become the sole source of funding for the

NHSC program, which has not received an

annual discretionary appropriation since FY2011.

With CHCF funding set to expire at the end of FY2015, Congress included two more years of

CHCF funding in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA; P.L.

114-10); see Table 6 and Appendix B. MACRA also extended funding for other HRSA programs

that were established and initially funded by the ACA; notably, the Maternal, Infant, and Early

Childhood Home Visiting Program.

Congressional Research Service

Table 6. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Bureau or Activity

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Request

2016

Enacted

Primary Care

2,253

4,149

2,817

2,992

3,636

5,001

4,191

—

2,141

2,481

2,672

2,856

3,542

4,901

4,092

—

CHCF Transfer (non-add)

—

(1,000)

(1,200)

(1,465)

(2,145)

(3,509)

—

(3,600)a

New mandatory proposal for FY2016 (non-add)

—

(2,700)b

—

Health Centers Tort Claims

100

—

School Based Health Centers (ACA Sec. 4101(a))

—

Health Center Construction (ACA Sec. 10503(c))

—

1,500

—

Hansen’s Disease Programsc

—

1,249

1,357

1,086

1,001

1,043

1,058

1,799

—

141

315

295

285

283

287

810

—

CHCF Transfer (non-add)

—

(290)

(295)

(285)

(283)

(287)

—

(310)a

New mandatory proposal for FY2016 (non-add)

—

(523)b

—

Faculty Loan Repayment Program

Training for Diversitye

—

Primary Care Training and Enhancement

237

—

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(198)

—

Rural Physician Training Grants

—

Interdisciplinary, Community-Based Linkagesf

—

(12)

(2)

—

30g

—

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(21)g

(20)

(25)

—

Nursing Workforce Developmenth

290

242

231

218

223

232

—

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(47)

—

Children’s Hospitals GME Payments

317

268

265

251

264

265

Health Centers

Health Workforced

National Health Service Corps (NHSC)

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

Public Health Workforce Development

CRS-26

—

100i

—

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Request

2016

Enacted

GME Targeted Support (New mandatory proposal)

—

400i

—

Teaching Health Center GME Payments (ACA

Sec.5508(c))

—

230

—

60j

Other Health Workforce Programsk

—

National Practitioner Data Bank (User Fees)

—

984

1,128

1,208

1,193

1,220

1,254

1,352

—

Maternal and Child Health Block Grant

661

656

639

605

632

637

—

Healthy Start

105

104

101

102

—

Maternal, Infant Home Visiting (ACA Sec. 2951)

100

250

350

380

371

400l

—

400l

New mandatory proposal for FY2016

—

500m

—

113

112

105

110

112

—

Ryan White HIV/AIDS

2,315

2,337

2,392

2,249

2,313

2,319

2,323

—

Health Care Systems

267

101

103

118

—

Health Care Systems Programsp

—

Hansen’s Disease Programs

—

Health Center Infrastructure (ACA Sec. 10502)

100

—

State Health Access Grants

—

340B Drug Pricing Programs

—

User fee (non-add)

—

(8)

—

Bureau or Activity

Maternal and Child Health

Family-to-Family Health Centers (ACA Sec. 5507)n

Other Maternal and Child Health Programso

Rural Health

185

138

131

142

147

128

—

Other Activities

813

467

460

436

446

448

465

—

Congressional Earmarks

337

—

Family Planning

317

299

294

278

286

300

—

Program Management

147

162

160

151

153

154

157

—

Healthy Weight Collaborative (PPHF Transfer)

CRS-27

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Request

2016

Enacted

—

8,067

9,663

8,202

8,097

8,902

10,330

10,375

N/A

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside

—

User Fees

—

ACA Mandatory Funds: PPHF Transfers

271

—

ACA Mandatory Funds: CHCF Transfers

—

1,290

1,495

1,750

2,428

3,796

—

3,910

ACA Mandatory Funds: Other

255

2,035

405

432

376

403

—

465

New Mandatory Proposals for FY2016

—

4,123

—

Total, Discretionary Budget Authority

7,492

6,269

6,212

5,861

6,046

6,112

6,225

N/A

Bureau or Activity

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Operations

Total, Program Level

Less Funds From Other Sources

Sources: The funding amounts are from congressional budget justification documents and HHS’s Budget in Brief available at

http://www.hhs.gov/budget/; and from P.L. 114-10.

Notes: Individual amounts may not add to subtotals or totals due to rounding.

a. The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA; P.L. 114-10) appropriated two more years of funding to the CHCF; $3,600 million for each

of FY2016 and FY2017 for health center operations, and $310 million for each of FY2016 and FY2017 for the NHSC.

b. The President’s FY2016 budget proposed the following new mandatory funding for FY2016 to replace the expiring CHCF: $2.7 billion for health center operations,

and $523 million for the NHSC. Congress and the President have since enacted P.L. 110-14, which included an additional two years of funding for the CHCF (see

table note “a”).

c. Beginning in FY2012, funding for the Hansen’s Disease Programs appears under Health Care Systems.

d. Health Workforce does not include the Home Health Aide Demonstration, which was authorized and funded by ACA Section 5507(a). The demonstration received

an annual appropriation of $5 million for each of FY2010 through FY2012. [Note: HRSA’s Bureau of Health Workforce was created in May 2014 by combining the

Bureau of Health Professions, which administered most of HRSA’s primary care training programs, and the Bureau of Clinician Recruitment and Service, which

administered the NHSC, NURSE Corps, and the Faculty Loan Repayment Program.]

e. Training for Diversity includes the following programs: Centers for Excellence, Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students, and the Health Careers Opportunity

Program.

Interdisciplinary, Community-based Linkages includes the following programs: Area Health Education Centers (AHEC), Geriatric Programs, and Mental and

Behavioral Health Education and Training.

g. Total includes $6 million for State Health Workforce Development grants.

h. Nursing Workforce Development includes the following programs: NURSE Corps (formerly the Nursing Education Loan Repayment and Scholarship Program);

Advanced Nursing Education; Nursing Workforce Diversity; Nurse Education, Practice, Quality and Retention; Nurse Faculty Loan Program; and Comprehensive

Geriatric Education.

CRS-28

CRS-29

The President’s FY2016 budget proposed new mandatory funding for Targeted Support for Graduate Medical Education, which would be used to provide additional

support for the Children’s Hospital GME Payment Program and full support for the Teaching Health Center GME program.

MACRA (P.L. 114-10) appropriated $60 million for each of FY2016 and FY2017 for GME payments to teaching health centers.

Other Health Workforce Programs include HealthCare Workforce Assessment, Oral Health Training, and the Patient Navigator Program (funded through FY2011).

MACRA (P.L. 114-10) appropriated $400 million for the home visiting program for each of FY2015 through FY2017.

The President’s FY2016 budget proposed new mandatory funds to extend and expand the home visiting program through FY2025, including $500 million for

FY2016. However, MACRA (P.L. 114-10) provided three more years of funding for the program (see table note “l”).

ACA Section 5507(b) funded family-to-family information centers through FY2012. Several subsequently enacted laws, most recently MACRA (P.L. 114-10), have

extended that funding through FY2017.

Other Maternal and Child Health Programs include Autism and Other Developmental Disorders, Traumatic Brain Injury, Sickle Cell Services Demonstration,

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening, Emergency Medical Services for Children, and Heritable Disorders.

Health Care Systems Programs include Organ Transplantation, National Cord Blood Inventory, C.W. Bill Young Cell Transplantation Program, and Poison Control

Centers.

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Indian Health Service (IHS)56

Agency Overview

IHS provides health care for approximately 2.2 million eligible American Indians/Alaska Natives

through a system of programs and facilities located on or near Indian reservations, and through

contractors in certain urban areas. IHS provides services to members of 566 federally recognized

tribes either directly or through facilities and programs operated by Indian Tribes or Tribal

Organizations through self-determination contracts and self-governance compacts authorized in

the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA).57

The Snyder Act of 1921 provides general

For more information

statutory authority for IHS.58 In addition,

CRS Report R43330, The Indian Health Service (IHS): An

Overview, by (name redacted).

specific IHS programs are authorized by two

CRS Report R44040, Indian Health Service FY2016 Budget

acts: the Indian Sanitation Facilities Act of

Request and Funding History: Fact Sheet, by (name reda

195959 and the Indian Health Care

cted) .

Improvement Act (IHCIA).60 The Indian

Sanitation Facilities Act authorizes the IHS to

construct sanitation facilities for Indian communities and homes, and IHCIA authorizes programs

such as urban health, health professions recruitment, and substance abuse and mental health

treatment, and permits IHS to receive reimbursements from Medicare, Medicaid, the State

Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and thirdparty insurers.

As discussed earlier, IHS receives its appropriations through the Interior/Environment

appropriations act. IHS funding is not subject to the PHS Program Evaluation Set-Aside.

Agency Funding Since FY2010

IHS’s funding, which includes discretionary appropriations and collections from third-party

payers of health care, increased between FY2010 and FY2015 from $5.1 billion to $5.9 billion

(see Table 7). This increase was driven both by increased discretionary appropriations, which

rose from $4.1 billion to $4.6 billion, and by increased collections, which rose from $891 million

to $1.1 billion. Much of the funding increase was used to support clinical services. Discretionary

appropriations, in particular, have increased funding for purchased/referred care, a subset of the

clinical services budget line that applies to funds used to refer patients to an outside provider

when the IHS cannot provide a service within its system. Collections received from providing

clinical services are also used to augment the clinical services budget.

This section was written by (name redacted), Specialist in Health Servic es.

P.L. 93-638; 25 U.S.C. §§450 et seq.

P.L. 67-85, as amended; 25 U.S.C. §13. The Snyder Act established this authority as part of the Bureau of Indian

Affairs within the Department of the Interior. The Transfer Act of 1954 (P.L. 83-568) transferred this authority to the

U.S. Surgeon General within the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (now HHS).

P.L. 86-121; 42 U.S.C. §2004a.

P.L. 94-437, as amended; 25 U.S.C. §§1601 et seq., and 42 U.S.C. §§1395qq and 1396j (and amending other

sections). This act was permanently reauthorized by the ACA. See CRS Report R41630, The Indian Health Care

Improvement Act Reauthorization and Extension as Enacted by the ACA: Detailed Summary and Timeline, by (name reda

cted) .

Congressional Research Service

Table 7. Indian Health Service (IHS)

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Program or Activity

Clinical and Preventive Services

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2016

Request

2015

4,139

4,171

4,335

4,277

4,436

4,607

4,858

3,845a

3,877b

4,038c

3,987d

4,142e

4,303f

4,545g

(779)

(780)

(844)

(801)

(879)

(914)

(984)

Preventive Health

144

147

143

147

154

163

Special Diabetes Program for Indiansi

150

147

150

Other Health Services

560

559

636

603

753

831

886

Urban Health Projects

Indian Health Professions

Tribal Management/Self-Governance

Direct Operations

Contract Support Costs

398

471

448

612

663

718

401

411

448

427

460

469

649

Maintenance and Improvement

60j

61k

59k

62l

98l

Sanitation Facilities Construction

115

Health Care Facilities Construction

185

Facilities/Environmental Health Support

193

199

194

211

220

227

Medical Equipment

Total, Program Level

5,100

5,140

5,418

5,307

5,649

5,906

6,392

891

915

954

1,021

1,060

1,106

1,131

Special Diabetes Program for Indiansi

150

147

150

Total, Discretionary Budget Authority

4,052

4,069

4,306

4,131

4,435

4,642

5,103

Clinical Services

Purchased/Referred Care (non-add)h

Health Facilities

Less Funds from Other Sources

Collections

Rental of Staff Quarters

CRS-31

Sources: Funding amounts for FY2010, FY2011, and FY2012 are taken from IHS’s FY2012, FY2013, and FY2014 congressional budget justification documents,

respectively. Funding amounts for FY2013, FY2014, and FY2015 are taken from the FY2015 HHS Budget in Brief. Funding amounts for FY2016 are taken from the

FY2016 HHS Budget in Brief. These documents are available at http://www.hhs.gov/budget/.

Notes: Individual amounts may not add to subtotals or totals due to rounding.

a. Includes $891 million in collections from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, private insurance, and other programs.

b. Includes $915 million in collections from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, private insurance, and other programs.

c. Includes $954 million in collections from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, private insurance, and other programs.

d. Includes an estimated $1,021 million in collections from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, private insurance, and other programs.

e. Includes an estimated $1,060 million in collections from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, the Department of Veterans Affairs, private insurance, and other programs.

Includes an estimated $1,106 million in collections from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, the Department of Veterans Affairs, private insurance, and other programs.

g. Includes an estimated $1,131 million in collections from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, the Department of Veterans Affairs, private insurance, and other programs.

h. This was previously referred to as “Contract Health Services.”

PHSA Section 330C provides an annual appropriation of $150 million through FY2017 for this program. These mandatory funds are subject to a 2% sequestration

(not shown for FY2015 and FY2016).

Includes $6 million that IHS received from rental of staff quarters.

k. Includes $8 million that IHS received from rental of staff quarters.

Includes $8 million that IHS estimates the agency will receive from rental of staff quarters.

CRS-32

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

National Institutes of Health (NIH)61

Agency Overview

NIH is the primary agency of the federal government charged with performing and supporting

biomedical and behavioral research. Its activities cover a wide range of basic, clinical, and

translational research, as well as research training and health information collection and

dissemination. The agency is organized into 27 research institutes and centers, headed by the NIH

Director. The Office of the Director (OD) sets overall policy for NIH and coordinates the

programs and activities of all NIH components, particularly in areas of research that involve

multiple institutes. The institutes and centers (collectively called ICs) focus on particular diseases,

areas of human health and development, or aspects of research support. Each IC plans and

manages its own research programs in coordination with the Office of the Director.

The bulk of NIH’s budget, about 83%, goes out to the extramural research community through

grants, contracts, and other awards. The funding supports research performed by more than

300,000 non-federal scientists and technical personnel who work at more than 2,500 universities,

hospitals, medical schools, and other research institutions around the country and abroad.62 A

smaller proportion of the budget, about 11%, supports the intramural research programs of the

NIH institutes and centers, funding research performed by NIH scientists and non-employee

trainees in the NIH laboratories and Clinical Center. The remaining 6% funds various research

management, support, and facilities’ needs.

For more information

NIH derives its statutory authority from the

PHSA. Title III, Section 301 of the PHSA

CRS Report R41705, The National Institutes of Health

(NIH): Background and Congressional Issues, by (name reda

grants the Secretary of HHS broad permanent

cted) .

authority to conduct and sponsor research. In

CRS Report R43341, NIH Funding: FY1994-FY2016, by

addition, Title IV, “National Research

(name redacted) .

Institutes,” authorizes in greater detail various

CRS Report R43944, Federal Research and Development

activities, functions, and responsibilities of the

Funding: FY2016, coordinated by (name redacted)

NIH Director and the institutes and centers.

All of the ICs are covered by specific

provisions in the PHSA, but they vary considerably in the amount of detail included in the

statutory language. There are few time-and-dollar authorization levels specified for individual

activities. Congress mandated a significant reorganization of IC responsibilities in the FY2012

Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 112-74, Division F) by creating a new National Center for

Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) and eliminating the National Center for Research

Resources (NCRR). Activities relating to translational sciences from NCRR and many other ICs

were consolidated in NCATS, and NCRR’s other programs were moved to several other ICs and

the OD.

NIH gets almost its entire funding (99.5%) from annual discretionary appropriations. As shown in

Table 8, the annual Labor-HHS-ED appropriations act provides separate appropriations to 24 of

the ICs, the OD, and the Buildings and Facilities account. One of the ICs (Environmental Health

This section was written by (name redacted), Specialist in Biomedical Policy.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FY2015 Budget in Brief, March 4, 2014, p. 39, http://www.hhs.gov/

budget/fy2015/fy-2015-budget-in-brief.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Sciences) also receives funding from the Interior/Environment appropriations act. In addition,

NIH receives a mandatory appropriation for type 1 diabetes research.

Agency Funding Since FY2010

NIH’s funding in FY2015 is about 5% below the FY2010 level. This decline can be viewed as

part of a broader funding trend that dates back to FY2003, the year Congress completed a fiveyear doubling of NIH’s budget that resulted in the agency’s funding increasing from $13.6 billion

in FY1998 to $27.2 billion in FY2003.

Following the doubling period, NIH had several years of modest funding increases. Funding for

the agency peaked in FY2010 at $31.2 billion before decreasing in each of the next three years.

Overall, NIH’s budget has failed to keep pace with the rising cost of biomedical research—as

measured by the Biomedical Research and Development Price Index (BRDPI)—since the end of

the doubling period. In constant (i.e., BRDPI-adjusted) 2012 dollars, NIH funding in FY2015 is

22% lower than the FY2003 level.63

For more information, see CRS Report R43341, NIH Funding: FY1994-FY2016, by (name redacted) .

Congressional Research Service

Table 8. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Institutes and Centers (ICs)

2010a

2011b

2012c

2013

2014

2015

2016

Request

Cancer (NCI)

5,098

5,059

5,067

4,783

4,932

4,953

5,098

Heart/Lung/Blood (NHLBI)

3,094

3,070

3,076

2,900

2,989

2,996

3,072

Dental/Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)

413

410

387

398

407

Diabetes/Digestive/Kidney (NIDDK)d

1,959

1,942

1,945

1,835

1,884

1,749

1,788

Neurological Disorders/Stroke (NINDS)

1,634

1,622

1,625

1,532

1,589

1,605

1,660

Allergy/Infectious Diseases (NIAID)e

4,815

4,776

4,486

4,230

4,401

4,418

4,615

General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)

2,048

2,034

2,428

2,291

2,362

1,657

1,587

Child Health/Human Development (NICHD)

1,327

1,318

1,320

1,245

1,283

1,287

1,318

Eye (NEI)

706

701

702

656

676

677

695

Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)

695

684

685

646

665

667

682

NIEHS, Interior/Environment appropriationf

1,108

1,100

1,121

1,039

1,172

1,198

1,267

Arthritis/Musculoskeletal/Skin (NIAMS)

538

534

535

505

520

522

533

Deafness/Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

418

415

416

392

404

405

416

Mental Health (NIMH)

1,494

1,477

1,479

1,394

1,420

1,434

1,489

Drug Abuse (NIDA)

1,067

1,051

1,052

992

1,018

1,016

1,047

Alcohol Abuse/Alcoholism (NIAAA)

462

458

459

433

446

447

460

Nursing Research (NINR)

145

144

145

136

141

145

Human Genome Research (NHGRI)

524

511

513

483

498

499

515

Biomedical Imaging/Bioengineering (NIBIB)

316

314

338

319

327

337

Minority Health/Health Disparities (NIMHD)

211

210

276

260

268

271

282

Complementary/Integrative Health (NCCIH)g

129

128

121

124

128

1,267

1,258

—

575

542

634

633

660

Aging (NIA)

[former] Center for Research Resources (NCRR)

Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

CRS-35

2010a

2011b

2012c

2013

2014

2015

2016

Request

Fogarty International Center (FIC)

National Library of Medicine (NLM)

349

345

346

360

337

394

Office of Director (OD)

1,177

1,167

1,459

1,411

1,303

1,414

1,443

Buildings & Facilities (B&F)

100

125

118

128

129

Total, Program Level

31,243

30,926

30,860

29,151

30,070

30,311

31,311

715

847

150

142

139

150

31,084

30,767

30,702

29,001

29,923

29,446

30,314

Institutes and Centers (ICs)

Less Funds From Other Sources

PHS Evaluation Set-Asideh

Type 1 Diabetes Research (NIDDK)i

Total, Discretionary Budget Authority

Sources: Funding amounts for FY2010 are taken from the NIH FY2012 congressional budget justification. Amounts for FY2011 are from the FY2013 justification.

Amounts for FY2012 are from the FY2014 justification, available (along with older years) at http://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/. Funding amounts for FY2013 are from the

FY2015 HHS Budget in Brief. Funding amounts for FY2014, FY2015, and FY2016 are taken from the FY2016 Justification of Estimates for Appropriation Committees, Vol.

1, Overview, table on “Budget Request for Institute and Center,” p.85 at http://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/br.html.

Notes: FY2010 through FY2013 IC and NLM amounts are not comparable to FY2014 as they do not reflect transfers from ICs to NLM. FY2010 and FY2011 are not

adjusted for comparability for the NCATS/NCRR reorganization. Totals may differ from the sum of the components due to rounding.

a. FY2010 reflects real transfer of $1 million from HHS Office of the Secretary to NIMH, $4.6 million transfer to HRSA Ryan White program (Secretary’s authority),

and transfers among ICs for the Genes, Environment, and Health Initiative (NIH Director’s authority).

b. FY2011 reflects real transfer of almost $1 million from HHS Office of the Secretary to NIMH for the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee.

c. FY2012 reflects Secretary’s transfer of $8.727 million to HRSA for Ryan White AIDS and Secretary’s net transfer of $18.273 million for Alzheimer’s disease

research to NIA from other ICs.

d. Amounts for NIDDK do not include mandatory funds for type 1 diabetes research (see note i).

e. FY2010 and FY2011 amounts include funds appropriated to NIAID for transfer to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria ($300 million in FY2010

and $297.3 million in FY2011). FY2010 amount also includes BioShield transfer of $304 million; for more information, see CRS Report R43607, The Project BioShield

Act: Issues for the 113th Congress, by (name redacted).

This is a separate account in the Interior/Environment appropriations act for NIEHS research activities related to Superfund.

g. Reflects name change from National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine to National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; provision

included in P.L. 113-235.

h. For each of FY2010 through FY2014, the $8 million in set-aside funds was allocated to NLM. All of the FY2015 set-aside funds (i.e., $715 million) were allocated to

NIGMS.

PHSA Section 330B provides an annual appropriation of $150 million through FY2017 for this program. These mandatory funds were subject to sequestration in

FY2013 and FY2014, but not in FY2015 or FY2016 (as discussed earlier in the report).

CRS-36

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

Administration (SAMHSA)64

Agency Overview

SAMHSA is the lead federal agency for increasing access to behavioral health services. It

supports community-based mental health and substance abuse treatment and prevention services

through formula grants to the states and U.S. territories and through competitive grant programs

that fund states, territories, tribal organizations, local communities, and private entities. SAMHSA

also engages in a range of other activities, such as technical assistance, data collection, and

workforce development.

SAMHSA and most of its programs and activities are authorized under Title V of the PHSA,

which organizes SAMHSA in three centers:



Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT)65

Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)66

Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS)67

Each center has general statutory authority, called Programs of Regional and National

Significance (PRNS), under which it has established grant programs for states and communities

to address their important substance abuse and mental health needs. PHSA Title V also authorizes

a number of specific grant programs, referred to as categorical grants.

For more information

SAMHSA’s two largest grant programs are

separately authorized under PHSA Title XIX,

CRS Report R43968, SAMHSA FY2016 Budget Request and

Funding History: A Fact Sheet, by (name redacted)

Part B. The Community Mental Health

Services block grant falls within CMHS.68 The

full amount of the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment block grant falls within CSAT,

although no less than 20% of each state’s block grant must be used for prevention.69

In addition to the three statutorily defined centers, SAMHSA’s budget reflects a fourth category,

“health surveillance and program support,” for other activities such as collecting data, providing

statistical and analytic support, raising public awareness, developing the behavioral health

workforce, and maintaining the National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices.70

This section was written by (name redacted), Analyst in Health Policy.

PHSA Title V, Part B, Subpart 1; 42 U.S.C. §§290bb et seq.

PHSA Title V, Part B, Subpart 2; 42 U.S.C. §§290bb-21 et seq.

PHSA Title V, Part B, Subpart 3; 42 U.S.C. §§290bb-31 et seq.

PHSA Title XIX, Part B, Subpart I; 42 U.S.C. §§300x et seq.

PHSA Title XIX, Part B, Subpart II; 42 U.S.C. §§300x-21 et seq.

In the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (P.L. 112-74, Division F, Title II; 125 Stat. 1073) and the

accompanying conference report (H.Rept. 112-331, pp. 1139-1142), Congress rejected proposed changes to

SAMHSA’s budget structure in the FY2012 budget request. Congress directed that future budget requests reflect the

structure of the three centers (i.e., CMHS, CSAT, and CSAP) and the Health Surveillance and Program Support

account. SAMHSA’s subsequent budget requests have reflected this structure.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

The last comprehensive reauthorization of SAMHSA and its programs occurred in 2000 as part of

the Children’s Health Act,71 which also added “charitable choice” provisions allowing religious

organizations to receive funding for substance abuse prevention and treatment services without

altering their religious character.72 Since 2000, Congress has expanded some of SAMHSA’s

programs and activities without taking up comprehensive reauthorization. Although

authorizations of appropriations for most of SAMHSA’s grant programs expired at the end of

FY2003, many of these programs continue to receive annual discretionary appropriations.

Agency Funding Since FY2010

From FY2010 through FY2015, SAMHSA’s program-level funding has generally hovered around

$3.6 billion, dropping to $3.4 billion in FY2013 due to sequestration and rebounding to $3.6

billion in FY2014 (see Table 9). The current (FY2015) distribution of funding across CMHS

(30%), CSAT (60%), CSAP (5%), and Health Surveillance and Program Support (5%) overstates

the amount allocated to substance abuse treatment and understates the amount allocated to

substance abuse prevention because CSAT’s funding reflects the entire amount of the Substance

Abuse Prevention and Treatment block grant, including the 20% set-aside for prevention. Relative

to FY2015 funding, the FY2016 request would increase program-level funding by 1% while

decreasing discretionary budget authority by 2%; it would make up the difference with increased

funding from the set-aside and PPHF transfers.

P.L. 106-310, Titles XXXI-XXXIV.

PHSA §1955, 42 U.S.C. §300x-65; PHSA §§581 et seq., 42 U.S.C. §§290kk et seq.

Congressional Research Service

Table 9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Program or Activity

Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS)

Mental Health Block Grant

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2016

Request

2015

1,005

1,022

994

910

1,078

1,071

1,078

421

420

460

437

483

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

(21)

Programs of Regional & National Significance

361

384

316

267

377

371

377

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

—

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

(20)

(45)

—

(12)

(38)

Children’s Mental Health Services

121

118

117

111

117

PATH Homeless Formula Grant

Protection & Advocacy Formula Grant

2,253

2,214

2,229

2,114

2,176

2,181

2,141

Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT)

Substance Abuse Block Grant

1,799

1,783

1,800

1,710

1,815

1,820

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

(79)

Programs of Regional & National Significance

452

431

429

404

361

321

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

(9)

(2)

(30)

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

—

(25)

(29)

—

(50)

—

Prescription Drug Monitoring (NASPER)a

—

Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP)

202

186

176

175

211

Programs of Regional & National Significance

202

186

176

175

211

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

—

(16)

102

177

160

154

193

194

237

Health Surveillance and Program Support

102

171

124

123

119

129

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

(23)

(29)

(27)

(30)

(29)

PPHF Transfer (non-add)

—

(18)

(15)

—

(20)

Public Awareness and Support

—

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

—

(16)

Performance & Quality Information Systems

—

(13)

—

PHS Evaluation Funds (non-add)

Agency-Wide Initiatives

CRS-39

Program or Activity

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2016

Request

2015

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside (non-add)

—

Data Request and Publications User Feesb

—

St. Elizabeths Hospitalc

—

3,583

3,599

3,569

3,354

3,622

3,621

3,666

PHS Evaluation Set-Aside

132

130

133

134

211

PPHF Transfers

Data Request and Publications User Feesb

—

3,431

3,380

3,347

3,210

3,426

3,474

3,396

Total, Program Level

—

(1)

Less Funds From Other Sources

Total, Discretionary Budget Authority

Sources: SAMHSA Justification of Estimates for Appropriations Committees for FY2012 (FY2010 figures), FY2013 (FY2011 figures), FY2014 (FY2012 figures), FY2015

(FY2013 figures), and FY2016 (FY2014, FY2015, and FY2016 request figures), available at http://www.hhs.gov/budget/.

Notes: Individual amounts may not add to subtotals or totals due to rounding.

a. The Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (P.L. 112-10) prohibited the funding of grants originally authorized under the National All Schedules Prescription

Electronic Reporting Act of 2005 (NASPER, P.L. 109-60) and first funded in FY2009. These grants have not been funded since FY2010. See CRS Report R42593,

Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs, by (name redacted), (name redacted), and (name redacted).

b. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (P.L. 113-76), authorized SAMHSA to collect fees “for the costs of publications, data, data tabulations, and data analysis

completed under [PHSA Title V] and provided to a public or private entity upon request, which shall be credited to this appropriations and shall remain available

until expended for such purposes.”

c. Upon the transfer of the West Campus of St. Elizabeths Hospital from HHS to the General Services Administration (GSA) in 2004, HHS and GSA signed a

Memorandum of Agreement that required (among other things) HHS to pay for remediation (clean-up) of hazardous substances found on the site after the date of

transfer. Funding for this purpose has not been needed since FY2010.

CRS-40

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Appendix A. American Recovery and Reinvestment

Act (ARRA): FY2009 Supplemental Appropriations

Through ARRA, Congress appropriated a total of $22.4 billion in supplemental FY2009

discretionary appropriations for health and human services programs administered by HHS. Of

that total amount, $15.1 billion was provided directly to, or allocated for, programs and activities

administered by the PHS agencies (see text box below).73 In most instances the funding was to

remain available for obligation through the end of FY2010 (i.e., September 30, 2010). Essentially

all the ARRA discretionary funds provided to HHS have been obligated.74

ARRA Funding for PHS Agency Programs

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ): $1.1 billion

These funds were used to support comparative effectiveness research (now called patient-centered outcomes

research). Of the total amount: $300 million was administered by AHRQ; $400 million was transferred to NIH; and

the remaining $400 million was allocated at the discretion of the HHS Secretary and used primarily to develop the

infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research.

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA): $2.5 billion

These funds were used to support HRSA programs as follows: $1.5 billion for health center construction, renovation,

equipment, and health information technology (HIT); $500 million to support new health center delivery sites and

service areas and expand services at existing sites; $300 million for the National Health Service Corps; and $200

million for HRSA’s health workforce programs.

Indian Health Service (IHS): $500 million

These funds were used to support the following IHS facility and infrastructure projects: $227 million for health

facilities construction; $100 million for maintenance and improvement; $85 million for HIT activities; $68 million for

sanitation facilities construction; and $20 million for health equipment, including HIT. [Note: IHS received an

additional $90 million in ARRA discretionary funds from the Environmental Protection Agency for sanitation facilities

construction.]

National Institutes of Health (NIH): $10 billion

These funds were used to support NIH activities as follows: $8.2 billion for intramural and extramural scientific

research; $1.3 billion for extramural research facility construction, renovation, and equipment; and $500 million for

the construction, repair, and improvement of NIH’s facilities. NIH also received a transfer of $400 million from

AHRQ for comparative effectiveness research (see above).

Prevention and Wellness Fund: $1 billion

These funds were used as follows: $300 million for CDC’s immunization program; $50 million for CDC and CMS to

support state and local efforts to reduce health care-associated infections; and $650 million for CDC to support an

evidence-based clinical and community-based prevention and wellness program—Communities Putting Prevention to

Work (CPPW)—focused on increasing levels of physical activity, improving nutrition, reducing obesity rates, and

decreasing smoking prevalence and exposure to secondhand smoke.

P.L. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115. The HHS appropriations were included in Title VIII (Labor-HHS-ED) of Division A of

ARRA. In addition to these discretionary appropriations, ARRA included several HHS mandatory spending provisions.

For more information, see CRS Report R40537, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5):

Summary and Legislative History, by (name redacted) et al.

HHS maintains a Recovery Act website at http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/. It includes detailed implementation plans

for all the ARRA-funded programs, up-to-date information on ARRA obligations and outlays (by state), and links to

the Recovery Act websites maintained by individual HHS agencies.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Appendix B. Community Health Center Fund

ACA Section 10503 established a Community Health Center Fund (CHCF) to provide

supplemental funding for community and other health centers and the National Health Service

Corps (NHSC). The law provided annual appropriations to the CHCF totaling $11 billion over the

five-year period FY2011 through FY2015. Of that total, $9.5 billion is for health center

operations and the remaining $1.5 billion is for the NHSC.

Table B-1 shows the amounts appropriated for each fiscal year as well as the post-sequestration

levels for FY2013-FY2015. CHCF funds are awarded to the various types of health centers that

are supported by the federal health center program. Those include community health centers and

migrant health centers, as well as facilities that serve the homeless and residents of public

housing. Sequestration of CHCF funding for community health centers and migrant health centers

is capped at 2%, whereas CHCF funding for the other types of facilities (i.e., health centers for

the homeless and for public housing residents) and for the NHSC is fully sequestrable at the

applicable rate for nonexempt nondefense mandatory spending (see Table 2).

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA; P.L. 114-10)

appropriated two more years of funding to the CHCF. For both FY2016 and FY2017, MACRA

provided $3.6 billion for health center operations and $310 million for the NHSC. Table B-1

shows the amounts for FY2016.

While CHCF funding may have been intended to supplement—not supplant—annual

discretionary appropriations for the health center program and the NHSC, these mandatory funds

have partially supplanted discretionary funding for the health center program and entirely

replaced discretionary funding for the NHSC (see Table 6).

Table B-1. Community Health Center Fund, FY2011-FY2016

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Program

Health Center Program

2011

1,000

2012

1,200

Post-sequestration (non-add)

National Health Service Corps

290

295

Post-sequestration (non-add)

Total

1,290

1,495

2013

2014

2015

2016

Total

1,500

2,200

3,600

(1,465)

(2,145)

(3,509)

300

305

310

(285)

(283)

(287)

1,800

2,505

3,910

13,100

1,810

14,910

Sources: Prepared by CRS based on ACA Section 10503 and the HHS FY2016 Budget in Brief, available at

http://www.hhs.gov/budget/.

Notes: The ACA also included a one-time appropriation of $1.5 billion for health center construction and

renovation. Those funds are separate from the CHCF and are not included in this table.

a. As discussed earlier in the report, the FY2016 CHCF funding was not subject to sequestration.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Appendix C. Prevention and Public Health Fund

(PPHF)

ACA Section 4002 established the Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF), to be administered

by the HHS Secretary, and provided it with a permanent annual appropriation. Under the ACA,

PPHF’s annual appropriation would increase from $500 million for FY2010 to $2 billion for

FY2015 and each subsequent fiscal year. However, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation

Act of 2012 amended the ACA by reducing the PPHF appropriation from FY2013 through

FY2021 as part of a package of offsets to partly cover the costs of the law.75 The PPHF annual

appropriation is now $1 billion through FY2017, and thereafter will increase in increments to $2

billion for FY2022 and each subsequent fiscal year.

The HHS Secretary is instructed to transfer amounts from the PPHF to agencies for prevention,

wellness, and public health activities. The funds are available to the Secretary at the beginning of

each fiscal year. The Administration’s annual budget sets out the intended distribution and use of

PPHF funds for that fiscal year. The Secretary determined the distribution of PPHF funds for

FY2010 through FY2013. For FY2014 and FY2015 funds, Congress explicitly directed the

distribution of PPHF funds, prohibiting the Secretary from making further transfers.76

As discussed earlier in the report, the PPHF appropriation is fully sequestrable at the applicable

percentage rate for nonexempt nondefense mandatory spending (see Table 2). Sequestration is

applied to the entire appropriation by the Secretary before funds are transferred to the agencies.

The distribution of PPHF funds to HHS agencies for FY2010 through the FY2016 President’s

budget proposal is presented in Table C-1. Further details regarding PPHF distributions to

AHRQ, CDC, HRSA, and SAMHSA are provided in the respective agency budget tables in the

body of this report.77

For FY2013, the Secretary transferred almost half of available PPHF funds to CMS for ACA

implementation, as shown in Table C-1. This transfer reduced the PPHF funds that had been

provided to some of the PHS agencies from what they had received for FY2012. Along with the

sequestration of discretionary funding in FY2013, the loss of PPHF funds that year had a

significant effect on CDC’s budget for FY2013.78

In determining the transfer of PPHF funds for FY2010 through FY2013, the Secretary funded a

mix of pre-existing programs and activities, and programs and activities newly authorized under

the ACA. In directing the distribution of FY2014 and FY2015 PPHF funds, Congress in most

cases provided PPHF funds to pre-existing programs and activities.

P.L. 112-96, Section 3205; 126 Stat. 194.

See, for FY2015, P.L. 113-235, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Sec. 219 of general

provisions for Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, 128 Stat. 2489.

See also references to the PPHF in text and tables in CRS Report RL33880, Funding for the Older Americans Act

and Other Aging Services Programs, by (name redacted) and (name redacted).

CDC describes the trends in budget authority and PPHF transfers for the agency as a whole in an FY2015 budget fact

sheet (p. 2) at http://www.cdc.gov/fmo/topic/Budget%20Information/FY-2015-Fact-Sheets/CDC-Overview.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Table C-1. PPHF Transfers to HHS Agencies

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

2014

2015

2016

Proposala

463

454b

831

886

914

—

1,000

Agency

2010

2011

2012

ACL

AHRQ

CDC

CMS

HRSA

SAMHSA

192

271

611

809

Sequester

—

Total

500

750

2013

Sources: Prepared by Congressional Research Service based on HHS agency congressional budget justifications

for FY2012 through FY2016, http://www.hhs.gov/budget/; and HHS, “Prevention and Public Health Fund,” funding

distribution tables, http://www.hhs.gov/open/recordsandreports/prevention/index.html.

Notes: Individual amounts may not add to totals due to rounding. ACL is the Administration for Community

Living; OS is the Office of the HHS Secretary.

a. Distribution proposed by the Administration. This is not a budget request, as PPHF funds have already been

appropriated. Amounts do not reflect the 6.8% sequestration (i.e., $68 million) for FY2016 required under

current law; see Table 2.

b. Funds were used for implementation of insurance exchanges under the ACA. CMS, Justification of Estimates

for Appropriations Committees, Fiscal Year 2015, p. 349, http://www.hhs.gov/budget/.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Appendix D. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Trust Fund

Section 6301(e) of the ACA established the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund

(PCORTF) to support comparative clinical effectiveness research at both HHS and the PatientCentered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI).79 The law provided annual funding to the

PCORTF over the period FY2010-FY2019 from the following three sources: (1) annual

appropriations; (2) fees on health insurance and self-insured plans; and (3) transfers from the

Medicare Part A and Part B Trust Funds.

Specifically, the ACA appropriated the following amounts to the PCORTF: (1) $10 million for

FY2010; (2) $50 million for FY2011; and (3) $150 million for each of FY2012 through FY2019.

In addition, for each of FY2013 through 2019, the ACA appropriated an amount equivalent to the

net revenues from a new fee that the law imposes on health insurance policies and self-insured

plans. For policy/plan years ending during FY2013, the fee equals $1 multiplied by the number of

covered lives. For policy/plan years ending during each subsequent fiscal year through FY2019,

the fee equals $2 multiplied by the number of covered lives. Finally, transfers to PCORTF from

the Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds are calculated by multiplying the average number of

individuals entitled to benefits under Medicare Part A, or enrolled in Medicare Part B, by $1 (for

FY2013) or by $2 (for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2019).

For each of FY2011 through FY2019, the ACA requires 80% of the PCORTF funds to be made

available to PCORI, and the remaining 20% of funds to be transferred to the HHS Secretary for

carrying out PHSA Section 937.80 Of the total amount transferred to HHS, 80% is to be

distributed to AHRQ. Table D-1 shows the allocation of PCORTF funds through FY2016.

Table D-1. Distribution of PCORTF Funding

(Millions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year)

Funding Recipient

2010

2011

2012

2013

2015

Est.

2014

2016

Est.

PCORI

120

289

376

506

578

HHS

—

127

145

AHRQ (non-add)

—

(8)

(24)

(58)

(75)

(102)

(116)

Office of the Secretary

(non-add)

—

(2)

(6)

(14)

(19)

(25)

(29)

150

361

470

633

723

Total

Source: CRS calculations using data provided in Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S.

Government, Appendix (FY2013-FY2016).

PCORI (established by ACA Section 6301(a), adding new SSA Section 1181) is a non-governmental body

authorized by Congress to evaluate existing research and to conduct original research examining the relative health

outcomes, clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness of different medical treatments.

ACA Section 6301(b) added a new PHSA Section 937 requiring the broad dissemination of research findings

published by PCORI. See Table 3.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Appendix E. FDA User Fee Authorizations

Table E-1. FDA User Fee Authorizations and Revenue

(Dollars in Millions, In Order of FY2015 Anticipated Revenue)

FY2015

Revenue

User Fee

Initial Authorizing Legislation and Year

Prescription drug

Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), 1992

(P.L. 102-300)

798

Tobacco product

Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, 2009

(P.L. 111-31)

566

Generic drug

Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), 2012

(P.L. 112-144)

312

Medical device

Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA), 2002

(P.L. 107-250)

128

Animal drug

Animal Drug User Fee Act (ADUFA), 2003

(P.L. 108-130)

Biosimilars

Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), 2012

(P.L. 112-144)

Mammography

Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA), 1992

(P.L. 102-539)

Color certification

Color Additive Amendments of 1960

(P.L. 86-618)

Rare pediatric

disease priority

review voucher

Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012

(P.L. 112-144)

Animal generic drug

Animal Generic Drug User Fee Act (AGDUFA), 2008

(P.L. 110-316)

Food reinspection

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), 2011

(P.L. 111-353)

Voluntary qualified

importer (VQIP)

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), 2011

(P.L. 111-353)

Export certification

FDA Export Reform and Enhancement Act of 1996 [for medical products]

(P.L. 104-134);

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), 2011 [for foods]

(P.L. 111-353)

Food recall

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), 2011

(P.L. 111-353)

Outsourcing facility

Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), 2013

(P.L. 113-54)

Tropic disease

priority review

voucher

Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA), 2007

(P.L. 110-85)

Total

1,909

Source: FY 2016 FDA Justification of Estimates for Appropriations Committees, All Purpose Table,

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/BudgetReports/UCM437622.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2010-FY2016)

Author Contact Information

(name redacted), Coordinator

Specialist in Health Policy

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov , 7-....

(name redacted)

Specialist in Public Health and Epidemiology

r[ edacted]@crs.loc.gov

, 7-....

(name redacted), Coordinator

Analyst in Health Policy

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov , 7-....

(name redacte d)

Analyst in Health Resources and Services

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

, 7-....

(name redacted)

Analyst in Health Policy

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov , 7-....

(name redacted)

Specialist in Health Policy

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

, 7-....

(name redacted)

Specialist in Health Services

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov, 7-....

(name redacted)

Specialist in Drug Safety and Effectiveness

r[ edacted]@crs.loc.gov

, 7-....

(name redacted)

Specialist in Biomedical Policy

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov , 7-....

Acknowledgments

The figures in the funding tables in this report were reviewed by (name redacted), Research Assistant.

Key Policy Staff

Area of Expertise

Name

Phone

Agency for Healthcare Research and

Quality (AHRQ)

(name r edacted)

7-....

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention (CDC)

(nameredacted)

7-....

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

(name redacted)

7-....

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

Health Resources and Services

Administration (HRSA)

(name reda

cted)

Bernice Reyes Akinbileje

7-....

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

Indian Health Service (IHS)

(name reda

cted)

7-....

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Judy A. Johnson

7-....

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

Substance Abuse and Mental Health

Services Administration (SAMHSA)

(name redacted)

7-....

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

HHS budget and appropriations,

sequestration

(name redacted)

7-....

[redacted]@crs.loc.gov

Congressional Research Service

EveryCRSReport.com

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the

Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on

issues that may come before Congress.

EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to all Congressional staff. The

reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to

the public.

Prior to our republication, we redacted names, phone numbers and email addresses of analysts

who produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentionally made

any other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.

CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in

the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without

permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a

third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or

otherwise use copyrighted material.

Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public

understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in

connection with CRS' institutional role.

EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.