Standardized Educational Test Scores
Congressional research reportMar 1, 1984
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
Congressional Research Service
The Library sf Congress
Washington, D.C.
20540
STANDARDIZED EDUCATIONAL TEST SCORES
IP0294S
The Congressional Research Service receives numerous requests for information
concerning standardized educational test scores of specific States and local
communities.
Standardized test scores typically are compiled only by the schools
or school districts that administer the exams; in general, they can be obtained
only by contacting school officials in each locality. Of increasing concern
are the nationwide average scores on both the American College Test (ACT) and
the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT).
This Info Pack provides basic information and background on standardized
educational tests.
Statistical material is included to reflect the most recent
results of those who have taken these tests who intend to go to college.
Additional information on this subject, primarily in newspapers and
periodicals, may be found in a local library through the use of indexes such as
the Education Index, Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Readers' Guide to
Periodical Literature, and the New York Times Index.
Members of Congress who want additional information may contact CRS at
287-5700.
We hope this information is useful.
Congressional Reference
Division
Congressional Research Service
The Library of Congress
Washington, D.C.
20540
STANDARDIZED EDUCATIONAL TEST SCORES
The Congressional Research Service receives numerous requests for standardized educational test scores of specific States and local communities.
With one exception, we are unable to provide such data.
Standardized test
scores typically are compiled only by the schools or school districts that
administer the exams; in general, they can be obtained only by contacting
school officials in each locality.
While some school officials regularly pro-
vide test score data to the public (sometimes local newspapers publish them),
others regard the scores as confidential and not for release.
Where scores
are available, normally school officials provide only averages or other group
measures; they do not divulge scores of individual students except to parents
or guardians.
At the present time, 44 States and the Districts of Columbia have some
kind of statewide testing program in which all or most public school students
in certain grades normally participate.
attached.)
(A list of these programs is
In some States, students must attain at least a specified minimum
score in order to be promoted or to graduate; in others, student scores are
used only to diagnose strengths and weaknesses. While a number of States have
developed their own tests for these assessments, reflecting their own priorities and curricula, others use one of several widely-administered exams such
as the California Achievement Test or the Iowa Test of Basic Skills.
Informa-
tion about these tests can be obtained by writing to State departments of education.
(The names and addresses of these agencies are attached.)
In the United States, students applying to college frequently are asked
to take either the American College Test (ACT), sponsored and administered by
the American College Testing Program of Iowa City, Iowa, or the Scholastic
Aptitude Test (SAT) sponsored by the College Entrance Examination Board of
New York City and administered by the Educational Testing Service of Princeton, New Jersey.
The national mean (that is, average) scores for these exams
are released annually.
(Attached are tables showing the respective national
means for the ACT since the 1969-1970 testing year and for the SAT since the
1951-1952 testing year.)
Recently, Educational Testing Service has begun releasing State mean SAT
scores.
(A copy of the latter for the 1982-83 testing year is attached.)
To
obtain State mean ACT scores, one must contact the appropriate State department of education.
To obtain school district or individual school mean ACT or
SAT scores, one must contact local school officials.
Local district or indi-
vidual school scores are not always available.
It is not clear what inferences, if any, can legitimately be drawn from
the State SAT score means.
The proportion of high school seniors taking the
SAT or ACT varies so much from State to State (as does the proportion of children completing high school) that comparisons among States may be deceptive.
For similar reasons, comparisons of ACT or SAT scores among school districts
or individual schools may be misleading.
Care must also be taken in drawing inferences from State SAT score means
about variations in the quality of education among the States.
The SAT is
designed to measure aptitude for college study, not to measure academic
achievement; it aims to predict who will do well in college, not to identify
who has learned the most in elementary and secondary school.
By itself, the
SAT should not be considered a good indicator of the quality of previous
schooling.
(Standardized achievement tests in various academic subjects are
also sponsored by the College Entrance Examination Board and administered by
the Educational Testing Service.
While these exams do measure the quality
of academic preparation, they are taken by relatively few students who are
not representative of college applicants, let alone of high school seniors
in general. )
One nationally administered examination that can be used to help assess
the quality of American elementary and secondary education is the National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
a congressionally authorized series
of tests for 9-year olds, 13-year olds, 17-year olds, and young adults in
reading, mathematics, science, social studies, writing, and other subjects.
Test results are available for a number of different student characteristics
such as sex, race, parents' education, and type and size of community; they also
are available both for the country as a whole and for four regional divisions.
NAEP results are not available by State, school district, or individual school.
(Attached is a paper summarizing trends in NAEP results in reading, science,
and mathematics.)
Further information about the results of NAEP tests may be
obtained by writing the National Assessment of Educational Progress, P.0.
Box 2923, Princeton, New Jersey, 08541.
March 1, 1984
Congressional Research Sew ice
The Library of Congress
Washington, D.C.
20540
AMERICAN COLLEGE TEST (ACT) AND SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST (SAT)
NATIONAL MEAN SCORES
Table 1 on the next page shows the estimated national mean (average)
scores on the American College Test (ACT), a four-part multiple-choice exam
designed to measure academic abilities students will need in postsecondary
education.
Students are measured in each part on the basis of the number of
answers they get correct on scales of 1 to 33 (English), 1 to 36 (mathematical), 1 to 34 (social studies), and 1 to 35 (natural sciences); they also
receive a composite score on a scale of 1 to 35.
Candidates with high scores,
such as 25, are generally considered to be more likely to have academic success in college than are candidates with low scores, such as 12.
College offi-
cials use test results not only for deciding who should be admitted but also
for guidance and placement.
The ACT is one of several postsecondary assessment exams sponsored and
administered by the American College Testing Program, a private nonprofit
organization.
Table 1
American College Test Score National Means
1969-1970 to 1982-83
Academic
year
-
English
1/ Source:
cent sample.
Math
Social
S tudies
National
Sciences
Composite
American College Testing Program, based upon a 10 per-
Table 2 on the next page shows the national mean (average) scores on the
Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), a two-part examination designed to measure aptitude for college study.
It consists of a verbal section and a mathematical sec-
tion, each of which has multiple choice questions that test a variety of intellectual abilities.
Candidates are measured on the basis of the number of
answers they get correct (though to discourage guessing, a fraction of the
number of incorrect answers is subtracted from the number that are correct),
and are given a score for each section on a scale of 200 to 800.
Candidates
with high scores, such as 700, are generally considered to have greater aptitude for college work than candidates with low scores, such as 400.
Test
results are used by college officials primarily to help them decide who
should be admitted.
They also are used for placement and guidance.
The SAT is one of several postsecondary education admissions tests
sponsored by the College Entrance Examination Board, a private, nonprofit
association. The Educational Testing Service has responsibility for preparing, administering, and scoring the SAT.
TABLE 2 .
Academic
Year
Scholastic Aptitude Test Score National Means 1_/
1951-1952 to 1982-1983
SAT Verbal
High School
2/
All Candidates
Seniors -
SAT Mathematical
High School
All Candidates
Seniors 21
--
11 Source:
-
--
-
p
p
Educational Testing Service.
2 1 These scores are not available until the 1966-67 academic year.
scores for 1966-67 through 1970-71 are estimates.
March 1, 1984
EDUCATION DAILY
January 5 , 1 9 8 4
p p . 5-8
D a t a File
State Use Of Barlc Skllls Testa, 1083
Alabama
Alaska
-
A n 8 8 To8td
arrckr
Inltlrtod
Mlnlmum
Sklllr
Alabama Basic Skills Test
Language Arts & Math
Reading
3,689
3&6
1981
YES
California Achievement Test
Language Arts & Reading
English & History
Math & Science
14
7-12
1-12
I948
NO
Reading & Math
4&H
1978
Alaska Statewide Assessment
Program (Biennial-objective
referenced)
American Samoa
Cumculum Referenced Tests in I
Arizona
Arizona Basic Skills Program
California Achievement Test
Arkansas
8
T y p ot To8l
Stab
-
Arkansas Minimum
Performance Test
+
lish, Social Studies, Science & Math Being Drveluped.
Language Arts & Reading
English
Math
Reading
English
Math
Language Arts
English
Math
Scholastic Research Associates
(Not mandatory)
California
California Test of Basic Skills
Language Arts
English
Reading
Math
Connecticut
Connecticut Assessment of
Educational Progress
Language Arts, Reading, Social
Studies, Art, Music, Math
& Science
Reading, Language Arts & Math
Education Evaluation & Remedia
Assistance Proficiency Exam
-
--
-
California Achievement Test
Language Arts & Reading
English
Math
Assessment for Minimal
Performance Requirements
Reading, Writing & Math
Comprehensive Test of Basic Ski
Reading, Math, Language Arts,
Reference Skills, Science & Socia
Studies
Criterion Referenced
Reading & Science
Math
English
Florida
State Student Achievement Test
Language Arts & Reading
English
Math
Georgia
Iowa Test of Basic Skills
Language Arts
Reading & Math
4th & 8th Grade Criterion
Referenced Tests [ 10th grade if
local education agencies
(LEAS)desire1
Reading & Math
Delaware
District of
Columbia
Usually beforc
entrance into
high school
(graduation
reauirement)
6 1 9 8 4 C a p i t a l P u b l i c a t i o n s , I n c . Reproduced by t h e L i b r a r y of Congress, C o n g r e s s i o n a l
Research S e r v i c e w i t h p e r m i s s i o n of t h e c o p y r i g h t c l a i m a n t .
8
Date
Initlrtod
State
L a n p g e Arts
Reading
Social Studies & Science
Math
Guam
u
8
.
d
F a
Mlnlmum
Skllk
1983
NO
Fall 1981
YES
English
Criterion Referenced
(locally developed)
Hawaii State Test of Essential
Competencies
Hawaii
Language Arts & Reading
Science
History
Social Studies, Art & Music
Math
Foreign Languages
Competency-Bad Measures
Language Arts, Reading, History,
Social Studies, Art, Music, Math d
Science
Scholastic Aptitude Test,
Otis-Lennon Mental Ability Test
& Differential Aptitude Tests
Language Arts & Reading
Math
English
History
Foreign Languages
Idaho
*IdahoProficiency Test (Testing
Voluntarv 7540% wrtici~ate)
Reading, Writing, Composition &
Spelling
Indiana
Essential Skills Assessment Projec Reading
(Pilot project)
I
I
Educational Improvement Progral Language Arts
Readinn
~n~list
Social Studies, Math & Science
Kansas Minimum Competency
Reading & Math
Reading
English
Math
Louisiina
Louisiana Basic Skills TesHng
Language Arts, Reading & Math
Lan urge Arts & Reading
~ n g f s h& Math
Social Studies & Science
Maryland
Massachusetts
I
I
California Achievement Test
English & Math
Competency-based Prerequisites
English & Math
Social Studies ICitizenshid
Massachusetts Basic Skills
Language Arts
English
Math
Reading, Math, Social Studies,
Program (Random Sample Testins Science, Music, Art & Health
Minnesota
State Assessment
Language Arts, Reading, Social
Studies, Art, Music
Math & Science
Historv
NO
Sample of lOtl
grade student
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
NO
-
Typr ol Twt
Califomla Achievement Test
Q8C
Mlssbslppi
I
I
I
Montana
Nebnska
Nevada
I
I
I
Anr8 Tmt8d
Miuoud Essential Skills Test
Language Arb
Rerding & Math
History & English
English, Social Studirr & Math
Test of Achievement and
ProAdency
English, History, Social Studies,
Math & Science
I n agr Arts
~earng
English & History
Social Studies, Art, Music,
Math & Science
Montana Testing Service (&ttery of tests offered-LEA participation voluntary)
Nebnska Assessment (Batterv of Learning I i l l c L E A reauests tests)
Nevada Proficiency Exam
English & Math
NO
Missouri Assessment
]
New tirmpshire
Periodic Assessments
Language Arts & Reading
Histo , Social Studio & Math
~ng1i.X
New Jersey
New Mexico
Minimum Basic Skills Test
New Mexico High School
Proficiency Exam
Writing, Reading & Math
English, Social Studies k Math
I
II
I
North Carolina
I
Comprehensive Test of &sic Skills Language Arb & Reading
History, Sodrl Studies, Math &
Mencc
English
Math
Math Competency
I
NO
any year 9-12
YES
8 or 9
YES
Regenb Competency in Writing
I
WdHng
11
YES
WriHng
5
YES
WriHng Test for Elementary
Schools
Degrees of Reading Power
I
1
Reading
3,6,8or9&1
English & Math
11
YES
YES
Reading
1&2
YES
l&2
YES
( Dkppoatic Mathematics Inventory 1h t h
California Achivement Test
Ohio
YES
YES
WriHng
( Prescriptive Reading Inventory
English
'Reading
Math
9
36116
3,6&9
Scholastic Research Asaociatea
California Achievement Test
Publisher of Textbook
Program T a t
I
NO
YES
NO
Preliminary Competency Test in
Writing
North Carolina Competency Test
Northern
b h n a Islands
I
YES
NO
I Language Arts, Reading & Math
New York
I8
-
9 & 12
I Stanford Achievement Test
I
" Qmdm
4&6
4.618
8
Competency-baaed Test
YES
Social Studia & Science
YES
I2&,Y
YES
Arts
I Ohio T a t of Scholastic Achievement (LEASrequired to test)
NO
gub).ct Areas T a t d
Readingwriting 61 Math
Language Arts & Reading
0I.d.r
7& 1 1
U d For
D.1.
Mlnlmum
wtl8t.d
(Wrlllr
1 1978 & 1982 I YES
Writing, Histon, Stwial Studies.
Art, Music, Math & Science
Reading
--
-
Mathematics Basic Skills Test
Math
Spanish Basic Skills Test
Spanish
English Basic Skills Test
English
Rhode Island
lowa Test of Basic Skills
language Arts
Reading. Math & Study Skills
English
Rhode island Life Skills Test
Enelish. Math & Reading
South Carolina
Comprehensive Test of
Basic Skills
Language Arts & Reading
Social Studies, Math & Science
English
Basic Skills Assessment Test
Writing
Reading
Math
~ u g n o s t i crests
Math, Spelling, Language Arts &
Reading
Language Am, Reading & Math
Puerto Rico
Tennes*
I
Proficiency Exams k r Graduation
1 l Y Es
YES
10
4
1 1976
I NO
11973
I YES
allowed in
Reading Comwsition & Math
3,5&9
Reading, Math, Science & History
5 & 11
1975
NO
Local Test (Must conform to
criteria of competency; status
of all graduating students
must be reported; state does
random sampling)
Language Arts & Reading
English
Math & Science
1-6
7-12
1-12
1977
YES
Minimum Competency Test
Math & Reading
Scholastic Research Associates
Language Arts
Reading, Social Studies, Math &
Science
English
Basic Skills (Criterion Referenced
Tests)
Language Arts, Reading & Math
California Achievement Test
Language Arts & Reading
Math
English
Basic Skills Forms
A great variety of other measures
as part of the state assessment
0rOPram.
-- -
Vermont
Washington
Degrees of Reading Power
(One time studv-samde)
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Comprehensive Test of Basic Skill
Language A m
Reading, History. Social Studies,
Math & Science
English
I Legislation requires testing in 198586; tests being developed.
Source: Council of Chief State School Officefs, Humanltles a d State Educallon Agencle& POllcler, p.n#ctim
a d Plorp.ch
IPQ294S
EDUCATION DAILY
September 2 2 , 1983
p. 6
-
D a t a File
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES, COLLEGE-BOUND SENIORS, 1981
AND MEAN SAT SCORES, 1983
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mlssissippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Hlgh School*
Qraduates
C
d
k
Sonlon
g
~
~
K Qredurtes
Taking SAT
- SAT ScoressVerbal
Math
WASHINGTON POST
January 29, 1984 pp. Dl,D2
SATs Are Gettii in the Way of Education
-
Who cares about high scores? The question ix Have they learned an*?
By Dan Morgan
Q
UESTION: The Scholastic Aptitude
Teat (SAT) i8:
0 A clever device used by the educational
establishment to avoid its responsibilities.
E l A hurdle of much-exaggerated importance for high school seniors trying to get into
college.
C One symbol of what's wrong with high
school education in America.
The SAT itself does not allow an answer ot
"all of the above," but in this case, that is the
Wrrect answer. The declining status and significance of this test is one sign that the hide.bound American secondary educational system is at last undergoing some significant
changes.
Old institutions die slowly, and the SAT
still has a powerful mystique. It remains a
tense rite of pasage for nearly half of all high
Uatt Morgan is an editor of Outlook.
@ 1984
school seniors. Yesterday, some 267,000 filed
nervously into classroods and auditoriums
around the country to agonize over its multiple choice questions about vocabulary, grammer and math.
Yet there is a growing belief among educatom, that the SAT is an outmoded educational instrument that is sending the wrong
message, or a t least an incomplete one, to the
nation's high schools. In the 58 years of its exiqtence, its creators have yet to define satisfactorily what, exactly, the SAT tests. It
comes too late in high school careers to be
much use in spotting areas where students
need more help. And it does not examine how
The Washington Post Company. Reproduced by the Library of Congress,
Congressional Research Service with permtssion of the copyright claimant.
well kids have actually mastered high schuol
subjects such as chemistry, Spanish, American history or geography.
One sign of changing times way a little-notic& report from Harvard College this winter. Harvard confirmed that it was considering allowing future candidates for admission
to skip the SAT altogether. Instead, applicants would have the option of submitting
the results of tests that evaluate 'their mastery, or "achievemcnt," in five high school
academic subjects.
The new thinking about testing is part of a
fundamental reevaluation of what is needed
to improve the quality of American secondary
education, a reevaluation that marks a clear
(and controversial) break with the recent
past.
Educational reformers have been urging
schools to radically revamp their curriculums,
to eliminate the junk courses that have accumulated in them over the past two decades,
and to require all students, not just collegebound ones, to master academic subjects such
as world history and science.
For that, the nation clearly will need an
overhauled testing system that helps studenk
identify their strengths and weaknesses early
in the game, instead of one that sorts out the
gifted (or the good test-takers) from the notso-gifted at the end of the academic process.
The United States, alone of all major in:
dustrial countries, relies primarily on a vague
concept called "aptitude" to evaluate secondary school students.
This year 1.5 million seniors will take the
SAT, the nation's leading aptitude test. Defenders of the exam say it tests a student's
ability to think and reason. Many of the
questions certainly do that; they are abstract
puzzles requiring skills that some feel are beyond the schools' ability to teach. The defenders also say the SAT does test a certain
kind of verbal and mathematical achievement. But the SAT does not test knowledge
of high schoo1courses.
That is not the main purpose, either, of the
American College Testing Program exam (the
ACT), which 900,000 students, most of them
in the Midwest, will take this y w .
knowledge of foreign language, hitory, English, science and math. The
questions are made up after extensive consultation with high school
teachers and college profes8ors d
over the country.)
ACT does a s k T r n e questions
about eocial studies and natural science, but it is similar to the SAT.
b
Remarkable as it may seem, only a
small minority of US. high school
students presently take standardized,
national teats that evaluate what
they have actually learned in high
school academic courses. In recent
years, many states have adopted
"minimum competency" requirements for high school diplomas, but
the requirements have been set so
low that almost all can pass.
There is nothing in this country
comparable to the British 0 (for Ordinary) h l tests - the stringent
three-hour, written examinations
that all English 16-year-olds take in
up to 10 different subjects. The 0
Levels, instituted in the 19509, rep W the old elitist system of British academic selection.
Lest year, only 280,000 high school
seniors out of 3 million (less than 10
percent) took the achievement tests
offered in 13 subjects by the Educational Testing Service in Princeton,
the m e company that produces the
SAT. M a t of those who did were
candidatea for elite colleges and universities that often require them.
Only 86,000 (3 percent) took the
ETS's achiwement teet in writing,
- which nsists of a 20-minute essay.
4The ievement testa are one-hour
+ltiplechoice exams that examine
3
L
It is easy to see why the U.S.
educational establishment has been
loath to test what hiih school students have learned.
As several major reports h u e d in
the last few months state, high school
curriculums in America are a "smorgasbord." The National Commission
on Excellence in Education has reported that high schools have a
"cafeteria-style curriculum in which
the appetizers and desserts can easily
be mistaken for the main course."
Only 31 percent of high school graduates complete intermediate algebra
and only 16 percent finish a geography course:
In an Ill~noissample, it turned out
that more than 2,100 different subjects were taught in the state's hiih
~ h o o l s and
, a large portion of them
were non-academic. That was in
1977. Since then, economic cuts and
state-ordered reforms have sharply
reduced electives, but curriculums
everywhereare still bloated with such
courses. Large high schools typically
offer 150 or more courses, including
subjects such as driving, speed-reading, gourmet cuisine, bowling, office
management, food services, medical
careers, "tots and toddlers" (baby
care), women in society, wilderness
survival and whale watching.
The available evidence is not reassuring about what high school students actually do learn. In 1976, one
out of seven 17-year-oldsthought the
president did not have to obey the
law and only 12 percent were aware
that plastica are petroleum producta.
International comparisons are
risky, given the uniquely broacl ba&
of US. public education, but results
of such comparisons have not &en
flattering to the United States. In
one, done between 1973 and 1977,
American 13-to-18-year-olds tested
near the bottom of industrial countries in civics, mathematia and reading comprehension.
I .
Why has a schoolroom "smorgasbord," and its shoddy results, been
tolerated for so long in a country that
constantly boasts of its commitment
to education? The answer is that the
its
nation's educational leaders
college deans, teachers' organizations,
testing companies, high school principals and state and local authorities
- have found convenient excuses to
avoid taking action. They have persieently claimed that they can't agree
among themselves on what students
should know. And they have fallen
back on an almost religious-sounding
incantation: local authorities, not
outsiders, should decide what is
taught in local schools.
The SAT, with its alleged objectivity and its claim to be "curriculum
free", has helped educators avoid the
real h u e s of educational quality. For
years, it provided admissions offices
at elite colleges and universities with
a convenient way to finesse the problem of identifying students' accom-
-
plishments, while still Tunneling
gifted applicants to them.
Because it almost defied definition,
the SAT enabled educators to duck
the charge that they were dictating
what schools should teach.
What makes recent proposals for
educational reform so intriguing is
that the propaah take a first stab at
identifying the knowledge and skills
that American students should acquire in high school. Several of the
proposals call in so many words for
something this country has never
had: a high school curriculum, rooted
in academic subjects and specific academic skills, that ie generally accepted nationwide.
Last year, the College Board, a
non-profit organization of 2,500 colleges, schools and school systems,
issued a %-page booklet identifying
"what [college] students need to
know and be able to do," It listed six
academic subjects (English, the arts,
mathematics, science, social studies
and foreign language), and six academic "competencies" (reading, writing, speaking and listening, mathematics, reasoning, and studying). The
booklet was general enough to avoid
charges that the College h d was
"dictating" to the schools, but it went
much further than ever before in saying that there are a set of definable
goals for all schoaia In some areas it
got specific. Under world history, it
said students ahould not only know
about the Renaissance and the Industrial Revolution, but also "the
epread of Islm."
The booklet was followed last summer by the release of two major reports that questioned current high
school curriculums. a
One, the report of the National
Commission on Excelence in Education, recommended that state and
local authorities require all studenh
geeking a diploma to take four years
of English, three years of mathemat-
These SAT sample questions measure ''aptitude." They require an
ability to reason and comprehend abstractions - qwlities that some
feel are difficult to teach i n a classroom. Six out of 10 students get the
right answer to Question 1. Slightly less than one out of 10 correctly
answer Question 2. (For correct answers, see box below.) By contrast,
achievement tests measure how well students have mastered specific
high school subjects. History achievements ask about the dates or significance of actwl events and chemistry questions may test a student's knowledge of chemical reactions. The questions are from "Taking the SAT," the College Board's guide for high school students.
1. In the figure above, a
rectangular piece of
paper ABCD is folded
along dotted line WZ ao
that A is on top of X
and DisontopofY and
then folded along XY so
that B is on top of W
and C is on top of Z. A
small semicircle S with
diameter on BC is cut
out of the folded paper.
If the paper is unfolded,
which of the answers at
right could be the result?
2. How many minutes will it take a rocket to travel 4,000 miles if its
average rate is 100 miles every t seconds?
ics, three years of science, three years
of social studies and one-half year of
computer science.
The other was former U.S. Commissioner of Education Ernest L.
Boyer's book, "High School," written
for the Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement of Teaching. Boyer
called for schools to establish a "core
of common learning," with required
courses in literature, the arts,foreign
language, history, civics, sciences,
mathematics, technology and health.
Boyer called for an end to the tracking of students into "academic" and
"general" programs. Under his plan
all students would take a solid group
of academic subjecta
Boyer's ideas have been attacked
on grounds that they could lead to a
Jhomogenous" system that would
keep schools from tailoring curriculums to local needs. Doesn't a school
in an Iowa farm community have different educational priorities and
values than,one serving ethnic neighborhoods in Chicago, they asked?
Boyer contends that question dodges
the real issue. *
"If a school district is incapable of
naming the t h i i it wants high
school graduates to know, if a community is unable to define the culture it wants high school graduates to
inherit, if education cannot help students see relationship beyond their
own personal ones, then each new
generation will remain dangerously
ignorant, and its capacity to live confidently and responsibly will be
diminished," wrote Boyer.
For better or worse, the testing
system is sure to have a major impact
on whether these curriculum reform
proposals get off the ground.
The SAT became a mass, nationwide k t after World War 11, when
higher education was expanding rapidly and colleges and universities
needed some uniform indicators. Initially, SAT scores were thought to be
an excellent predictor of college performance. When subsequent studies
questioned that assumption, the rationale for the SAT changed.
The current, more modeet view of
the College Board, which sponsors
the test, is that it is "one helpful
piece of information."
Spokesmen for some college admissions offices say SAT scores help
students evaluate their own scholastic strengths, so that they can "selfselect" colleges that fit those abilitiea
It identifies "gifted" (if high scores
automatically warrant that adjective)
students who otherwise might get
lost in the admissions shuffle because
they attend an undistinguished high
school. And it provides a check on
whether grades on high school transcripts accurately reflect a student's
ability.
But Boyer and others suggest that
the mcat important use of the SAT
today is one for which it was never
intended: as a report card on schools,
not students. The decline in average
SAT scores starting in 1964 has been
a prime mover in calls for educational
reform. And rightly or wrongly, communities often judge the quality of
individual schools on how well students score on the test.
a
a
Most colleges, and ETS itself, have
come to recognize the limitations of
the SAT. Nevertheless, it is still associated with academic "merit,"
through the Preliminary SAT
(PSAT), the exam in junior year
which is used to select semi-finalists
for National Merit Scholarships. If
anything, students, parents and
than
schools seem more OW
ever with SAT results, and a whole
industry has grown up around coaching students to raise their scores,
This is ironic in view of considerable evidence that SAT scores will
have little bearing on whether the
vast majority of high school students
enter the college of their choice.
"Most private colleges in America
today, including some with rather
ANSWERS:
Question 1: The answer is A.
Question 2: The answer i i ~ ,
._I
~chiwement(not aptitude), linking it
to a "core" academic curriculum. Ah
rccompanying qwwtlormaire could
collect information about their inter.
atr, goale, p b &tory and expert
ences. That informatim could then
be wdto help them chow ruitabb
academic or employment o~~ortunk
highly selective, prestige
such ae Swarthmore,Yale or the Univeraity of viginib SAT^ are still im.
portant. But euch etudenta are in a titiea
FX'S has already begun work on
minority nationwide.
Of this year's 1,750,000 college- new series of diagnostic testa that.
bound eeniora, nearly 700,000 will teachers could use in classrooms to
enter two-year colleges that, for the pinpoint students' strengths and
most part, have open enrollments. weakneeees all through the academii:
Another 400,000 will enter state uni- year.
versities, most of which
the Big
"We need better testing at the
Ten schools in the Midwest, for ex- school level for purpoees of instrue
ample - accept all applicants from tion and learning," says ETS presitheir states. (The University of Wis- dent Gregory Anrig. "Our present
consin stopped requiring the teat en- tests don't answer the qwation, 'How
tirely in 1972.)
am I doing in progreasing toward my
Another 650,000 go on to four-year goals?' We don't have testa that are
colleges. Many of these do use teats helpful teaching tools."
and are selective; but they are not
A revamped testing system would
nearly as selective as many students create a new set of standards for
believe.
schools and students. One obvious
In all, probably no more than possiblity would be combining
80,000 of next year's freshman places achievements and SATs, to get a
will be in the 100 or so institutions more complete picture of a student's
where the combined math and verbal ability to reason and master a+,scores of entering freshmen average demic subjects. Such a test could do
1,100 or better out of a possible 1,600, a better job of recognizing persod
according to UCLA's Mi.In other qualities such as hard work, determiprestigious names, are not highly se- words, a score of 650 on the verbals nation, curiosity and love of learning
lective," writes Richard Moll in and 450 on the math would still be - all indispensable for doing well in
"Playing tfie College Admissions high enough to give a student a rea- academic subjecta, but not neasGame," a handbook for parents and sonable chance at a selective college. sarily for wring high on aptistudents. "High price, a declinhg A combined score of 1,200 is high tests.
6
number of college-age Americans, ap- enough to get a student into 90 perChanges of this magnitude would
prehension regarding the worth of a cent of the 50 most selective schools, face bureaucratic resistance. 'If impl&
bachelor's degree in the job market Astin estimates
mented, there would be leas need for
and the growth and strength of the
teachers of "electives," but more deI
state university system nationwide
mand for teachers who are really
have created his phenomenon. . . .
One concern of educators such as competent in their academic fields,
Unfortunately, many colleges pose as George Hanford, president of the as European and Japanese secondary
being more selective than they really College Board, is that the message of school teachers tend to be.
are."
Such reforms are bound to run into
h e r and otlter reformers may be
According to Moll, not more than misinterpreted as a 4 for a return criticism that they favor students
40 private colleges (and far fewer to a rigid curriculum emph&ig from affluent school systems blessed
public ones) "enjoy the luxury of ad- rote and fact learning. In emphasii- with gifted teachers. There is concern
mitting one out of two of their candi- ing achievement and m&.ery, he that raising academic standards too
dates, and not more than half a warns, we could sacrifice thinking high might force kids out of school,
dozen private colleges admit [as few and reasoning. And in a rapidly ,especiallyminorities. That would deas]one out of fi."
changing world, thaee two qualities feat the purpaee of US. public
Mogt C6lleges still require SAT will be more important than acquir- education, which has always strived
acores, but less than 2 percent use ing knowledge.
to be open rather than exclusive. But
them as the single most important
In Hanford's view, the SAT is a it is hard to see how that could hapcriterion for admission.
good teat of those important qual- pen. It is the lack of higher education
"After you get bey~ndthe first 50 itiea "I worry about too much em- facilities, not the tests, that make
or' 75 most selective colleges, the phasis on achievement," he says.
European education selective. There
problem is who not to admit," says
But even if the SAT does serve are only 40 academic colleges in ail of
/Alexander Astin, d i r a t a of the some useful purposes, it seems ur- England, while nearly two out of
Higher Education Research Institute gently in need of major modification. three US. high school students go on
At the University of California in Los
For one thing, it ignores the needs to one of the nation's 3,000 degea
.Angeles. For them, the SAT is useful of hundreds of thousands of students and universities.
mainly in weeding out the very worst who are not going on to college, but
The pressing issue for the United
,students (or worst teat takers) not' who still need guidance in planning States is not wider access to higher
in selecting the brightest.
their futwea Boyer proposes replac- ,education. It is the disappointing
ing the SAT with a Student Achieve- level of knowledge, academic skills
m
ment and Advisement Test (SAAT), and motivation of young people who
To students in the Washington which all &dents would 'take. It feel, unjustifiably, that they have had
area who have their h o p set on would evaluate theii academic ,agood education in high school
I
i
-
<
.
-
19
Septembex 18, 1983
p . A2
466
463
427
427
MARYLAND
VIRGINIA
+4
+2
890
4-5
0
0
-4
-I-39
-4
1978-83
468.
425
420
430
FEMALE
MALE
923
865
893
TOTAL
-1
-1
scores of those who graduated from
high school last June.
I t includes statewide figures that
show combined scores on the two
parts of the test up 4 points in
Maryland and 2 points in Virginia.
The score for District of Columhia
students in both public and private
0
+2
-
-9
-15
schools rose by 5 points, though it
was still 67 points below the nationwide average.
The wore for Maryland matched
the national average, while Virginia's
was 3 points below it.
The College Board said scores for
D.C.public schools and other local
-16
-23
-13
1973-83
-20
-1
+1
1982-83
1973-83
1982-83
- -
CHANGE IN MATH
CHANGE IN VERBAL
SOURCE: COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAMINATION BOARD
493
445
MATH
VERBAL
ALL
1983
AVERAGE SAT SCORES BY SEX NmONWlDE
IIJRISDICTION
-24
-49
+3
-33
1973-83
CHANGE IN TOTAL SCORE
1982-83
893
826
893
TOTAL
NOTE: SCORES INCLUDE BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS IN EACH
427
399
DISTRICT Of
COLUMBIA
468
425
MATH
UNITED STATES
VERBAL
AVERAGE SAT SCORES
Reproduced by t h e C o n g r e s s i o n a l Research S e r v i c e ,
L i b r a r y of Congress, w i t h p e r m i s s i o n of t h e c o p y r i g h t c l a i m a n t .
@ 1983 The Washington P o s t Company,
After rising last year for the first
time in almost two decades, the nationwide average score on the Scholastic Aptitude Test remained unchanged this spring, the College
Board reports today.
While last year's rise was celebrated as a pmible "watershed" for
American schtn)ls, the failure of this
year's SAT ticores to continue lo advance was a disappointment to educators.
The SAT is the nation's most
widely used college entrance exam,
taken by alnicmt 1 million high
school senion a year. The mathematics average on this year's exam
was 468, up one point from 198'2,
but the verbal average fell one point
to 425.
!'I think the trend line seems to
indicate that we've leveled off, that
the slippage has stopped," said Robert G. Cameron, executive director of
research and development for the
Cdlege Board, which ia an associat i m of about 2,500 schools and colleges.
:I'd be a fool to predict the future," Cameron continued, "but I'm
still optimistic that with all the refovmers on the lcnse there will be
some real improvement."
William ,I. Hennett, chairman of
the National Endowment li)r the
Humanities, was more cautious.
"Maybe you can say we're holding
steady," he remarked, "hut we're
steady at the bottom."
in 1963, just before the scores
began their slide, the nationwide
SAT average was 478 on the verbal
part and 502 on the mathematics
part.
By 1980 and 1981, when the
scores reached their lowest level, the
combined average score had declined
by 90 points-54 points in the verbal score and 36 points in math.
I ~ s year,
t
the scores rose 2 points
in verbal and 1 point in math.
"After dropping so much, this is
just flat," Bennett said of the last
two years' results. "Nobody can say
we have the problems licked."
A perfect score on each half of the
two-hour multiple-choice exam is
800 points. The lowest is 200. The
test is taken by about a third of all
high school seniors.
In math, the exam concentrates
on problem-solving, using arithmetical reasoning, algebra and geometry.
The verbal part measures reading
comprehension and vocabulary.
'The new report is based on SAT
Nationwide College Entrance Test Scores Show No Improvement
WASKINGTON POST
IQ
0
The greatest increases were in
,school systems will be available next
mathematics and physical science,
week.
George H. Hanford, president of particularly among female studenb,
the College Board, said the 1-point though males continue to take more
rise in the nationwide SAT average courses in both subjects.
"I'm afraid we don't know what
in math "is apparently 'due to the
improved performance of women, as goes on in those courses," Cameron
the average score for women rose 2 said. "We don't know how rigorous
points from 1982, while the average they are."
score for men remained the same." , Average grades reported by high
Hanford said the score rise "co- school students were unchanged for
incides with increases in the amount the fourth year in a row, though they
of math that women report taking in are still down only slightly from the
high sch001 and parallels their in- peaks of grade inflation reached in
creasing interest in careers in such the mid-1970s.
fields as business and computer sciLast year, the College Board reence."
ported that gains by blacks and
Even with the increase, however, other minority groups played a
the average math score for female major role in the SAT increase, but
students is 48 points below that of scores for differ@ ethnic groups on
males. On the verbal part of the test, .this year's test will not be published
the average for males is 10 points until December.
ahead. Both sexes dropped 1 point
After a spurt during the 1970s,
on the verbal test last year.
the proportion of test-takers who are
Despite the mixed results on the black dropped slightly to 8.8 pertest, data collected from students cent, down from a peak of 9.1 perwho take it indicate a continuing cent in 1980.
trend toward enrolling in more acAsian students continued to inademic cwrsea
crease rapidly, reaching 4.2 percent,
Since 1977, the average amount of more than double the 2.0 percent restudy in major high school academic ported in 1975.
subjects-English,
m i a l studies,
The proportion of students in primathematics, foreign languages, and vate schools also rose, climbing from
science-has increased from 15.8 to 17.5 percent to 19.7 percent since
16.3 years.
1978.
Council of
Chief State
School Officers
DIRECTORY
379 Hall of the States
400 North C a p i t o l S t r e e t , N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
2021393-81 61
FEBRUARY 1984
Reproduced by t h e L i b r a r y of
Congress, Congressional Research
S e r v i c e , March, 1 9 8 4 .
CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS
ALABAMA
CALIFORNIA
Wayne Teague
Superintendent of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
Montgomery, Alabama 36130
(205 ) 832-3316
B i l l Honig
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
7 21 Cap it 01Mall
Sacramento, C a l i f o r n i a 9 5814
(916) 445-4338
Harold Raynolds, Jr.
Canmissioner of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
Alaska Off i c e B u i l d i n g
Juneau, Alaska 99811
(907) 465-2800
AMERICAN SAMOA
.
Mere T Bet ham
D i r e c t o r of Education
Department of Education
Pago Pago, T u t u i l a 96799
(0s 6 33-5159 )
*
A R I ZONA
Carolyn Warnkr
superintendent of P u b l i c
Instruction
S t a t e Department of Education
1535 West J e f f e r s o n
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
(602) 255-4361
ARKANSAS
Don R . Roberts
D i r e c t o r of t h e Department of
Education
L i t t l e Rock, Arkansas 72201
(501) 371-1464
.
Calvin F F r a z i e r
Canmissioner of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
303 West Colfax, 6 t h F l o o r
Denver, Colorado 80204
(303) 534-8871 e x t . 201
CONNECTICUT
Gerald N . T i r o z z i
Canmissioner of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
Post O f f i c e Box 2219
Hartford, Connecticut 06106
(203) 566-5061
DELAWARE
Willlam B. Keene
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Dept. of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
Post Off i c e Box 1402
Townsend Bldg.
Dover, Delaware 19901
(302) 736-4601
-
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
F l o r e t t a McKenzie
S uperintendent of P u b l i c Schools
D i s t r i c t of Columbia Public Schools
415 Twelfth S t r e e t , N.W.
Washington, D .C
20004
(202 ) 7 2 4 4 2 2 2
.
*Overseas Operator
E f f e c t i v e Date: 2/84
ILLINOIS
.
Ralph D. T u r l i n g t o n
Commissioner of E d u c a t i o n
S t a t e Department of E d u c a t i o n
C a p i t o l B u i l d i n g , Room PL 116
T a l l a h a s s e e , F l o r i d a 32301
(904) 487-1785
Donald G G i l l
Superintendent of E d u c a t i o n
S t a t e Board of E d u c a t i o n
100 North F i r s t S t r e e t
S p r i n g f i e l d , I l l i n o i s 6 2777
(217) 782-2221
GEORGIA
INDIANA
C h a r l e s McDaniel
Superintendent of Schools
S t a t e Department of E d u c a t i o n
S t a t e O f f i c e Building
A t l a n t a , Georgia 30334
(404) 656-2800
Harold H. Negley
S u p e r i n t e n d e n t of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Dept. of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e House, Room 229
I r d i a n a p o l l s , I n d i a n a 46 204
(317) 232-6612
IOWA
-
G l o r i a Nelson
D i r e c t o r of Education
Department of E d u c a t i o n
P o s t O f f i c e Box DE
Agana, Guam 96910
( 0 s 477-8975)*
R o b e r t D. Benton
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Dept. of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
Grimes S t a t e O f f i c e B u i l d i n g
Des Moines, Iowa 50319
(515) 281-5294
HAWAII
Donnis H . Thompson
Superintendent of E d u c a t i o n
P o s t O f f i c e Box 2360
Honolulu, Hawaii 96804
(808) 548-6405
Harold Blackburn
Commissioner of E d u c a t i o n
S t a t e Department of E d u c a t i o n
120 East T e n t h S t r e e t
Topeka, Kansas 66612
(913) 296-3201
KENTUCKY
J e r r y L. Evans
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of E d u c a t i o n
650 West S t a t e S t r e e t
B o i s e , Idaho 83720
(208 ) 334-3300
A l l c e McDonald
S u p e r i n t e n d e n t of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
1725 C a p i t o l P l a z a Tower
F r a n k f o r t , Kentucky 40601
(502) 564- 4770
Lom SIANA
MINNESOTA
J. K e l l y Nix
Ruth E. R a n d a l l
Commissioner of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
712 C a p i t o l Square Building
550 Cedar S t r e e t
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
(612 ) 296-2358
Superintendent of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
P o s t O f f i c e Box 44064
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804
(504) 342-3602
MISSISSIPPI
Robert E. Boose
Commissioner of Education
Department of Educational and
Cultural Services
S t a t e House
Augusta, Maine 04333
(207 ) 289 -23 21
David W. Hornbeck
S t a t e Superintendent of Schools
S t a t e Departmenbt of Education
200 West Baltimore S t r e e t
S B a l t imore , Mary land 21201
(301) 659-2200
John H. Lawson
Commissioner of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
Quincy Center Plaza
1385 Hancock S t r e e t
Quincy, Massachusetts 02169
(617) 770-7300
Charles E. Holladay
Superintendent of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
Post O f f i c e Box 771, High S t r e e t
Jackson, M i s s i s s i p p i 39 205
(6 01) 359 -3513
Arthur L. Mallory
Canmissioner of Education
D ep a r t ment of Element a r y & S ec ond a r y
Education
Post O f f i c e Box 480
J e f f e r s o n S t a t e Off i c e Building
J e f f e r s o n City, Missouri 65102
(314 ) 751-4446
Ed Argenbright
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e O f f i c e of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Capitol
He l e n a , Montana 59 620
(406 ) 444 -365 4
MICHIGAN
NEBRASKA
P h i l l i p E . Runkel
Supt. of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
Post O f f i c e Box 30008
115 We s t Allegan S t r e e t
Lansing, Michigan 48909
(517 ) 373-3354
Joseph E. Lutjeharms
Commissioner of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
Post O f f i c e Box 94987
301 Centennial Mall, South
L i n c o l n , Nebraska 68509
(402) 471-2465
NEVADA
NORTH CAROLINA
Ted Sanders
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
400 West King S t r e e t , C a p i t o l Complex
Carson C i t y , Nevada 89710
(702) 885-3100
A. Craig P h i l l i p s
superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Dept. of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
Education Building, Room 318
Edenton C S a l i s b u r y S t r e e t s
Raleigh, North Caro l i n a 27 611
(919 ) 733-3813
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NORTH WKOTA
Robert L. B r u n e l l e
Commissioner of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
410 S t a t e House Annex
Concord, New Hampshire 03301
(603) 271-3144
NEW JERSEY
Saul Coopeman
Canmissioner of ducati ion
S t a t e Department of Education
225 West S t a t e S t r e e t
Trenton, New J e r s e y 08625
(609) 292-4450
NEW MEXICO
Leonard J . DeLayo
Superintendent of Public I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
S t a t e Capitol
S a n t a Fe, New Mexico 87503
(505) 827-6635
NEW YORK
Gordon M. Ambach
Commissioner of Education
S t a t e Education ~ e p a r t m e n t
Albany, New York 12234
(518) 474-5844
Joseph C. Crawford
Superintendent of Public I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Dept. of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Capitol Building
600 Boulevard Avenue East
Bismarck, North Dakota 58505-0164
(701) 224-2261
NORTHERN MRIANA ISLANDS
Henry I . Sablan
Superintendent of Education
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Is l a rid s
Department of Education
Saipan, CM 96950
( 0 s 933/9812)*
O H 10
-
.
F r a n k l i n B Walter
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
65 South Front S t r e e t , Roan 808
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614) 466-3304
OKLAHOMA
L e s l i e R. F i s h e r
Superintendent of Public I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
Oliver Hodge Memorial Education Bldg.
2500 North Lincoln Blvd.
Oklahana C i t y , Oklahcma 73105
(405 ) 5 21-3301
O
m
O
N
SOUTH DAKOTA
Verne A. Duncan
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
700 R i n g l e Parkway, S .E
Salem, Oregon 97310
(503) 378-357 3
Same s 0 Hansen
S t a t e Superintendent
Dept. of Education & C u l t u r a l A f f a i r s
Divieio: of Elementary C S e c o d a r g
Education
P i e r r e , South Dakota 57501
(605) 773-3243
.
.
PENNSYLVANIA
TENNE SSEE
R o b e r t C. Wilburn
S e c r e t a r y of E d u c a t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
333 Market S t r e e t , 1 0 t h F l o o r
H a r r i s b u r g , Pennsylvania 1A 2 6
(717) 787-5820
Maria Socorro L a c o t
S e c r e t a r y of E d u c a t i o n
Department of Education
P o s t O f f i c e Bax 759
Hat o Rey , Puert o Rico 00919
(809) 751-5372
Robert L. McElrath
Ccmmissioner of E d u c a t i o n
S t a t e Department of E d u c a t i o n
100 Cordell H u l l B u i l d i n g
N a s h v i l l e , Tennessee 37219
(615 ) 741-2731
TEXAS
Raymon L. Bynum
Canmissioner of E d u c a t i o n
Texas Education Agency
201 E a s t 1 1 t h S t r e e t
Austin, Texas 78701
(512) 475-3271
MODE ISLAND
TRUST TERRITORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS
J . Troy E a r h a r t
Commissioner of - E d u c a t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
22 Hayes S t r e e t
Providence, Rhode I s l a n d 02908
(401) 277-2031
Harold W. Crouch
Chief
O f f i c e of Education
Saipan, Mariana I s l a n d s
( 0 s 9319)*
96950
-
UTAH
SOUTH CAROLINA
.
Leland Burningham
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e O f f i c e of E d u c a t i o n
250 E a s t F i f t h South
S a l t Lake C i t y , Utah 84111
(801) 533-5431
G
C h a r l i e G. Willlams
Superintendent of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
1006 Rutledge B u i l d i n g
1429 S e n a t e S t r e e t
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
(803) 758-3291
VERMONT
Stephen Kaagan
Commissioner of Education
S t a t e Department of Education
State Street
Montpelier, Vermont 05602
(802) 828-3135
Herbert J. Grover
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Dept. of Public I n s t r u c t i o n
125 South Webster S t r e e t
Post O f f i c e Box 7841
Madison, Wisconsin 53707
(608 ) 266-1771
V I RGI MA
S. John Davis
Superintendent of P u b l i c I n s t m c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
Post O f f i c e Box 64
James Monroe Bldg.
Fourteenth & F r a n k l i n Sts.
Richmond, Virginia 23216
(804) 225-2023
Lynn Simons
S t a t e Supt. of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Department of Education
Hathaway Building
Cheyenne, Wyaning 8200 2
(307 ) 777-7675
V I R G I N IShANDS
Charles W. T u r n b u l l
Commissioner of Education
Department of Education
Post O f f i c e Box 6640
Charlotte AmaUe .
S t . Thanas, Virgin I s l a n d s
(809) 774-2810
CCSSO OFFICE
00801
U SHIK T ON
Frank B. B r o u i l l e t
Superintendent af P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
S t a t e Dept. of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n
Old C a p i t o l Building
Olympia, Washington 25305
(206) 753-6717
WEST V I R G I N I A
Roy Truby
S t a t e Superintendent of Schools
S t a t e Department of Education
1900 Washington S t r e e t
Building B , Roan 358
Charleston, West V i r g i n i a 25305
(304) 348-3644
Willlam F. P i e r c e
Executive D i r e c t o r
Council of Chief S t a t e School O f f i c e r s
379 Hall of t h e S t a t e s
400 North Capitol S t r e e t , N.W.
Washington, D .C 20001
(202) 393-8161
.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.