U.S. Court of International Trade: Background, Judgeships, and Caseload Statistics

INSIGHTi

U.S. Court of International Trade:

Background, Judgeships, and Caseload

Statistics

July 17, 2025

Background of the Court

In 1980, with the passage of the Customs Courts Act, Congress reorganized the U.S. Customs Court as

the U.S. Court of International Trade. The judges serving on the Customs Court were reassigned to the

new court, “the name of which signified its judicial functions and its expanded jurisdiction over cases

related to trade.” Former Senator Dennis DeConcini, a sponsor of the 1980 act, stated that the “legislation

will offer the international trade community, as well as domestic interests, consumer groups, labor

organizations, and other concerned citizens, a vastly improved forum for judicial review of administrative

actions of government agencies dealing with importations.”

The subject matter jurisdiction of the court is determined by the Constitution and specific laws enacted by

Congress. Cases heard before the court include disputes over import procedures, customs regulations,

tariffs, and the application of trade agreements. More specifically, examples of the types of cases heard by

the court include those related to antidumping and countervailing duties (which can involve foreign

companies selling goods at prices below “normal value”), the classification and valuation of imported

merchandise, and actions to recover unpaid customs duties and civil penalties.

The geographic jurisdiction of the court is national in scope, with judges of the court assigned by the chief

judge, as needed, to preside at trials at any location within the United States (the court also is authorized

to hold hearings in foreign countries). Most cases are assigned to a single judge, but when “a case

involves the constitutionality of an act of Congress, a Presidential proclamation, or an Executive order, or

otherwise has broad and significant implications, the chief judge may assign the case to a three-judge

panel.” A three-judge panel of the court, for example, recently issued a ruling in a case related to tariffs

imposed by the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The ruling has been

appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which hears appeals from the Court of

International Trade.

Congressional Research Service

https://crsreports.congress.gov

IN12586

CRS INSIGHT

Prepared for Members and

Committees of Congress

Congressional Research Service

2

Judgeships

There are nine judgeships authorized for the Court of International Trade, with appointees serving as

Article III judges who have life tenure during good behavior and protection against diminution of salary.

Apart from the initial group of judges reassigned in 1980 from the Customs Court, there have been a total

of 23 judges appointed to the court (with the first nominee, Gregory W. Carman, confirmed in 1983). The

number of nominees confirmed to the court, by presidency, include six nominees confirmed during the

Reagan presidency, one during the George H. W. Bush presidency, five during the Clinton presidency, two

during the George W. Bush presidency, four during the Obama presidency, three during the first Trump

presidency, and two during the Biden presidency. As of this writing, there is one vacancy on the court.

Of the 23 nominees confirmed to the court, 19 (83%) were confirmed by voice vote or unanimous

consent. The first nominee confirmed by roll call vote was Leo M. Gordon, nominated by President

George W. Bush, who was confirmed by a vote of 82-0 in 2006. Additionally, the three most recent

nominees to the court were each confirmed by roll call vote (including both of President Biden’s

nominees).

Of the nine most recent judges to serve on the court, four served in the executive branch immediately

prior to being appointed to the court (specifically with the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of the

U.S. Trade Representative, or U.S. Department of Agriculture). Additionally, three judges served in the

private sector or were engaged in private practice immediately prior to being appointed, while one served

as a state judge and one was a law professor.

Selected Caseload Statistics

Figure 1 shows the number of case filings for the Court of International Trade for each 12-month period

ending September 30 from 1996 to 2024 (i.e., for FY1996 to FY2024). During this period, the minimum

number of filings was 223 (for FY2019), while the maximum number of filings was 6,433 (for FY1999).

Overall, the median number of filings per fiscal year during this period was 480.

The increase in filings in 1998 and 1999 was in response to a Supreme Court decision which declared the

harbor maintenance tax as unconstitutional under the Export Clause. Additionally, the spike in filings for

FY2020 was due to the “large number of cases that challenged additional duties imposed pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1581(i) on imports from the People’s Republic of China.”

For FY2024, the court reported a total of 252 case filings (representing a decline of 8% from 273 filings

during FY2023). Of the new filings, 128 (53%) were filed under 28 U.S.C. §1581(c) to contest final

determinations issued under antidumping and countervailing duty laws; 94 (39%) were filed under 28

U.S.C. §1581(a) to contest the denial of protests involving entries of merchandise; and 20 (8%) were

brought under 28 U.S.C. §1581(i), “which were actions brought against the United States that mainly

addressed tariff laws and the administration and enforcement of those laws.”

The number of filings during a given fiscal year is not indicative of the number of pending cases during

that same year (e.g., cases filed during a given fiscal year are not necessarily terminated during that same

year). Pending and terminated cases are not included in Figure 1. In FY2024 and FY2023, there were

4,621 and 4,628 cases pending, respectively, before the court. The median number of cases pending

before the court per fiscal year from FY1996 to FY2024 was 4,271.

Congressional Research Service

3

Figure 1. Number of Filings for FY1996 to FY2024

Source: CRS analysis of publicly available data from the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts.

The number of cases terminated by the court during this period ranged from a low of 259 during FY2024

to a high of 9,446 during FY2006. The median number of cases terminated by the court per fiscal year

from FY1996 to FY2024 was 482.

Author Information

Barry J. McMillion

Analyst in American National Government

Disclaimer

This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff

to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of

Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of

information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.

CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United

States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,

as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the

permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN12586 · VERSION 1 · NEW