Recent Executive Action on Spending: Potential Impact on Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs
Congressional research reportJan 8, 2026
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
INSIGHTi
Recent Executive Action on Spending:
Potential Impact on Regional Clean Hydrogen
Hubs
Updated January 8, 2026
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58) authorized and funded an $8 billion
program on Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs (Section 40314 and Division J, Title III, of IIJA)—networks
of hydrogen producers, consumers, and infrastructure in close proximity. The U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE) has committed up to $7 billion to seven consortiums (“selectees”) and obligated a small portion of
that amount. DOE selected a consortium for a Demand-Side Support Initiative valued at up to $1 billion.
Several factors—including the January 20, 2025, Executive Order (E.O.) 14154, “Unleashing American
Energy”; DOE’s reported plans to review all post-presidential election awards; and a January 27, 2025,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memorandum pausing obligation and disbursement of federal
financial assistance (later rescinded)—may impact spending on the hubs. Congress may be interested in
monitoring or modifying spending for this program.
Executive Branch Activities
Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations
DOE’s Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED) manages the funds. The uncertainty regarding
future staffing levels in the executive branch—in response to E.O. 14210, “Implementing the President’s
‘Department of Government Efficiency’ Workforce Optimization Initiative,” and various policy
directions—may impact OCED’s management of the funds.
Awards
DOE has concluded award negotiations for Phase 1, for planning, analysis, and design activities. The
Government Accountability Office (GAO) notes that each hub is “subject to future award negotiations at
the end of each phase.” See Table 1.
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN12528
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service
2
Table 1. Hydrogen Hub Selectees and Phase I Obligations and Outlays
Start of
Period of Performance
Phase 1 Obligation
Outlays
ARCHES H2 LLC
7/17/2024
$30.0 million
$5.629 million
Pacific Northwest Hydrogen
Association
7/19/2024
$27.5 million
$4.857 million
Battelle Memorial Institute
7/24/2024
$29.7 million
$2.189 million
Midwest Alliance For Clean
Hydrogen, LLC
9/1/2024
$22.2 million
$6.052 million
HyVelocity, LLC
11/18/2024
$22.0 million
$1.229 million
Heartland Hydrogen Hub,
LLC
1/17/2025
$20.0 million
$2.389 million
Mid-Atlantic Clean Hydrogen
Hub, Inc.
1/17/2025
$18.8 million
$1.804 million
$170.2 million
$24.149 million
Selectee
Total
Source: CRS analysis of data from USAspending.gov; outlays are as reported as of December 23, 2025.
Notes: Name of selectee is as given in USAspending.gov. ARCHES H2 LLC is more commonly known as the California
Hydrogen Hub. Battelle Memorial Institute is more commonly known as the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub.
HyVelocity, LLC, is more commonly known as the Gulf Coast Hydrogen Hub.
Combined, the consortia, when selected in October 2023, anticipated having operations in 16 states. The
announced, eventual value of each agreement ranges from $750 million to $1.2 billion.
Obligations and Disbursements
Grants and Cooperative Agreements in OCED
According to GAO, a federal agency enters into an obligation when it makes a “definite commitment that
creates a legal liability on the part of the federal government for payment of goods and services ordered or
received.” For competitive grant programs, this definite commitment generally occurs when a grant
agreement or a cooperative agreement is executed. Funds can only be disbursed after they are obligated.
In describing the OCED award cycle, a November 2024 study by GAO noted that once an award is made
to a selectee, “funding is obligated, and payments to reimburse authorized expenses may begin.” Table 1
shows total obligations of $170.2 million, roughly 3% of the appropriated funds (budget authority [BA])
of the $6.4 billion appropriated through FY2025. It is possible that additional obligations for the seven
selectees are proceeding through the pre-award process and have not yet been recorded. Only awards that
have been deemed obligated by the federal agency are recorded against appropriations and reported to
USAspending.gov.
Timing of Obligations
Several factors can affect the timing of obligations. For programmatic reasons, varying amounts of delay
may occur between the date when an agency receives BA and when it obligates that BA. For the hubs,
OCED issued a request for information notice in February 2022, a notice of intent in June 2022, and a
funding opportunity announcement in September 2022, soliciting letters of intent followed by full
applications. President Biden announced seven selectees in October 2023, with the start of the obligated
period of performance shown in Table 1. For the first hubs, 2.5 years separated enactment of BA in IIJA
Congressional Research Service
3
and the start of the hubs’ period of performance. A further possibility that could implicate outlays would
be rescissions. A rescission may be initiated and enacted by Congress, such as in an annual appropriations
bill. In FY2020, for example, P.L. 116-94 rescinded $58 million of unobligated funds from DOE’s Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy appropriation. In specific circumstances, the President can send a
special message to Congress proposing a rescission under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Title X
of P.L. 93-344).
Potential Impact of E.O. 14154 and OMB Memorandums
Section 7 of E.O. 14154 directs agencies to pause disbursement of funds appropriated in the IIJA, which
includes funds for the hubs. The executive order directs agencies to submit findings to OMB within 90
days of the date of the order. The executive order further directs agencies not to disburse identified funds
until the OMB director and assistant to the President for economic policy have replied.
OMB memorandum M-25-11, “Guidance Regarding Section 7 of the Executive Order Unleashing
American Energy,” discusses the scope of the executive order’s pause on IIJA funds. The OMB
memorandum explains that the pause in disbursements applies only to any IIJA funding supporting
policies at odds with the Trump Administration policies described in Section 2 of E.O. 14154; Section 2
does not explicitly mention hydrogen or the Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs. Whether or not
disbursements under the Phase I awards are covered by the executive order pause, a federal district court
has since preliminarily enjoined the Trump Administration from enforcing certain “unilateral, nonindividualized directives” to pause federal funds under existing awards.
Members of Congress may choose to debate the relative merits of investing in new technologies, such as
hydrogen, compared to reducing federal spending. Congress may also be interested in how any changes in
spending on the hubs might affect future use of hydrogen fuel and technologies generally or economic
development in regions hosting a hub.
Author Information
Martin C. Offutt
Analyst in Energy Policy
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
IN12528 · VERSION 7 · UPDATED
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.