Year-Round Sale of E15
Congressional research reportJun 5, 2026
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
INSIGHTi
Year-Round Sale of E15
Updated June 5, 2026
E15—a fuel blend of up to 15% ethanol and 85% gasoline—generally cannot be sold during the summer
driving season (June 1–September 15) because it does not meet gasoline Reid vapor pressure (RVP)
requirements, which limit fuel volatility under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The CAA statute allows the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator to issue a temporary fuel waiver of these
requirements (42 U.S.C. §7545(c)(4)(C)(ii)) under certain conditions. On March 25, 2026, EPA issued the
first nationwide fuel waiver for the 2026 summer driving season. The waiver allows E15 to be sold during
the summer driving season, in part, to address extreme and unusual fuel circumstances that EPA states are
“the result of ongoing issues in the Middle East, among other events.” EPA also states its “intention to
issue new waivers effectively extending (renewing) these waivers until such time as the … circumstances
described in this action are no longer present.”
President Trump’s January 20, 2025, Executive Order (E.O.) 14156, “Declaring a National Energy
Emergency,” included a provision about the year-round sale of E15. The order (Section 2(b)) states,
Consistent with 42 U.S.C. 7545(c)(4)(C)(ii)(III), the Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency, after consultation with, and concurrence by, the Secretary of Energy, shall consider issuing
emergency fuel waivers to allow the year-round sale of E15 gasoline to meet any projected
temporary shortfalls in the supply of gasoline across the Nation.
The statutory provision referenced in the E.O. is the third of three factors the EPA Administrator must
consider when determining whether to issue a temporary fuel waiver: whether the waiver is “in the public
interest.” The E.O. directs the EPA Administrator to consider issuing—but does not require the
Administrator to issue—temporary fuel waivers that would allow for the year-round sale of E15. In light
of the statutory limit that requires waivers to be effective for a period of 20 calendar days or shorter, to
achieve the year-round sale of E15, the EPA Administrator would have to issue a series of consecutive
waivers as was done for prior summer driving seasons.
Congress has explored legislative options pertaining to the year-round sale of E15. In May 2026, the
House passed H.R. 1346, which, in short, would allow E15 to be sold year-round and would make
changes to the small refinery exemption component of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). In the Senate,
S. 593 would also allow E-15 to be sold year-round. Some Members of Congress have requested that
“[a]ny legislative movement on E15 must be conditioned upon meaningful reforms to the Renewable Fuel
Standard (RFS).” E15 legislation was included in a short-term FY2025 spending bill introduced in the
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN10979
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service
2
House in December 2024 (H.R. 10445, 118th Congress); it was not included in the FY2025 continuing
resolution package that became law (P.L. 118-158).
Clean Air Act RVP Requirements
The CAA authorizes the EPA Administrator to regulate fuels and fuel additives. The act regulates (among
other pollutants) precursors for ground-level ozone, a primary component of smog, which has been found
to negatively impact human health and welfare, among other effects. One of the requirements intended to
reduce smog is a limit on gasoline volatility because volatile organic compounds within gasoline
evaporate more readily at higher temperatures (e.g., during the summer months) and can contribute to
smog formation. RVP is a common metric of volatility—the lower the RVP, the less the substance will
evaporate. RVP requirements in Section 211(h) of the CAA—which apply to the 48 contiguous states and
the District of Columbia—generally prohibit the sale of gasoline with an RVP greater than 9.0 pounds per
square inch (psi) during the high-ozone season (i.e., the summer months). In 2012, the National
Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL; renamed the National Laboratory of the Rockies [NLR] in
December 2025) reported that the addition of 10% ethanol to gasoline increases the RVP of the blend by
about 1.0 psi.
The CAA provides some exceptions, including a waiver—the “one-pound waiver”—stipulating that
ethanol-gasoline fuel blends containing 10% ethanol (E10) are subject to an RVP limit that is 1.0 psi
greater than what would otherwise apply given certain conditions (e.g., the 9.0 psi standard for certain
areas would subject E10 to a 10.0 psi limit). The waiver does not apply to reformulated gasoline (RFG);
there is a 7.4 psi RVP standard for RFG. EPA reports that about 30% of gasoline sold in the United States
is RFG. States may petition EPA to remove the 1-psi waiver for gasoline-ethanol blends containing 10%
ethanol (E10) (42 U.S.C. §7545(h)(5)). Some states have exercised this option. In addition, according to
EPA (for prior years), the waiver “does not apply in areas where EPA has approved a regulation into a
state implementation plan (SIP) that limits the applicability of the 1.0 psi allowance.” For the May 19,
2026, national fuel waiver, EPA reports it is “waiving the requirements in 40 C.F.R. §1090.215 that
govern volatility, and under this waiver, EPA is allowing gasoline to be distributed and sold nationwide
with an RVP of 9.0 psi (10 psi when blended with 9-15% ethanol).” EPA also reports that “[o]ther state or
local requirements or restrictions related to this matter may need to be addressed by the appropriate
authorities.” The regulations for gasoline RVP standards are available at 40 C.F.R. §1090.215.
Congressional Issues
NREL reported in 2012 that “the RVP impact of 15% ethanol is indistinguishable from that of 10%
ethanol in gasoline for all volatility seasons and base hydrocarbon vapor pressures,” and “there is no
technical reason for treating E10 differently from E15.” In general, it appears that greater substitution of
E10 with E15 may not lead to material emissions changes; however, there could be other market impacts
associated with E15. Thus, the sale of E15 year-round involves other issues that Congress may consider,
including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
How much consumer demand is there for E15?
Would the additional use of ethanol for E15 reduce consumer gasoline prices?
Who pays to install E15 fueling infrastructure (e.g., blender pumps)?
Would the rural economy benefit from year-round sale of E15?
What impact might additional sales of E15 have on the RFS program?
Would the additional use of ethanol for E15 raise environmental concerns?
Congressional Research Service
•
•
3
What effect, if any, will California’s October 2025 authorization of the sale of E15—
while state entities review whether E15 can meet California’s clean air requirements—
have on national markets for ethanol and other transportation fuels?
Author Information
Kelsi Bracmort
Specialist in Natural Resources and Energy Policy
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
IN10979 · VERSION 27 · UPDATED
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.