U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) FY2018 Appropriations: Congressional Action
Congressional research reportMay 16, 2018
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
Updated May 16, 2018
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) FY2018
Appropriations: Congressional Action
Enacted March 23, 2018, the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, FY2018 (P.L. 115-141), Division G, provided funding
for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, including
a total of $8.82 billion for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in Titles II and IV combined.
After rescissions, Title II provided $8.06 billion for EPA,
and Title IV (§430) appropriated an additional $766.0
million for EPA water infrastructure priorities and
Superfund emergency response, removal, and remedial
actions at eligible sites. Enacted earlier on February 9,
2018, the Further Additional Supplemental Appropriations
for Disaster Relief Requirements Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-123,
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Division B, Subdivision 1),
provided an additional $63.2 million for EPA in emergency
supplemental appropriations to address impacts of
Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria. Combined, P.L. 115141 and P.L. 115-123 appropriated a total of $8.89 billion
for EPA in FY2018, $3.23 billion (57%) above the
President’s FY2018 request of $5.65 billion and $709.2
million (9%) above the $8.18 billion enacted for FY2017 in
P.L. 115-31 and P.L. 114-254 combined. For a history of
EPA appropriations over the past decade, Figure 1 presents
the trend in annual budget requests and enacted
appropriations from FY2008 to FY2018.
Figure 1. EPA Requested and Enacted Appropriations
FY2008-FY2018 (not adjusted for inflation)
Source: Prepared by CRS using information from annual
appropriations acts, committee reports, and explanatory statements
presented in the Congressional Record. Amounts reflect applicable
rescissions and supplemental appropriations, including $7.22 billion in
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5).
Prior to the enactment of P.L. 115-141, EPA and other
federal departments and agencies operated under multiple
continuing resolutions generally at FY2017 enacted levels
(minus across-the-board rescissions). The House and Senate
initially proposed lower funding levels for EPA than
enacted in P.L. 115-141. As passed by the House on
September 14, 2017, the Make America Secure and
Prosperous Appropriations Act, 2018 (H.R. 3354), included
all 12 appropriations bills and would have provided $7.39
billion for EPA (after rescissions). Released November 20,
2017, the Senate Committee on Appropriations chairman’s
“mark” of FY2018 appropriations for Interior,
Environment, and Related Agencies proposed $7.91 billion
for EPA (after rescissions).
EPA Appropriations Accounts
Discretionary funding is annually appropriated to EPA
among 10 statutory accounts established in annual
appropriations acts: State and Tribal Assistance Grants
(STAG), Environmental Programs and Management
(EPM), Hazardous Substance Superfund (“Superfund”),
Science and Technology (S&T), Leaking Underground
Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund Program, Buildings and
Facilities, Office of Inspector General, Inland Oil Spill
Program, Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System
Fund, and Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation
Program that implements the Water Infrastructure Finance
and Innovation Act (WIFIA). In the reports accompanying
the annual appropriations bills that fund EPA, Congress has
allocated funding within these accounts for specific
program areas and activities. As indicated in Figure 2, the
proportional distribution of funding among these accounts
has remained similar over the past decade.
Figure 2. EPA Appropriations by Account FY2008FY2018 Enacted (not adjusted for inflation)
Source: Prepared by CRS using information from annual
appropriations acts, committee reports, and explanatory statements
presented in the Congressional Record. Amounts reflect supplemental
appropriations (including $7.22 billion in the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009) and across-the-board rescissions but not
rescissions of prior-year funds in certain accounts.
The STAG and EPM accounts have received the largest
share of funding, followed by the Superfund and S&T
accounts. The STAG account funds grants for water
infrastructure, brownfield site assessment and remediation,
diesel emissions reduction, targeted airsheds, and
“categorical” grants to states and tribes for carrying out
delegated regulatory authorities. The EPM account funds
additional grants and many cross-cutting agency activities.
https://crsreports.congress.gov
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) FY2018 Appropriations: Congressional Action
The Superfund account supports the environmental
remediation of priority sites on non-federal lands
designated for federal attention. The S&T account funds
scientific research to inform agency regulatory decisions.
Funding and Policy Issues
More than a dozen federal laws authorize EPA’s mission.
Congress appropriates funding for EPA to carry out much
of its responsibilities in coordination with delegated states
and tribes. Funding for implementation through delegated
authorities was an issue in the FY2018 appropriations
debate. P.L. 115-141 did not approve the President’s
request to eliminate or reduce funding for certain EPA
programs that support state and tribal delegation. In an
agency press release announcing the FY2018 budget
request, EPA indicated that the overall proposed reduction
in funding was intended to shift priorities to the agency’s
“core statutory mission,” reduce “redundancies” and
“inefficiencies,” and “return responsibility for funding local
environmental efforts to state and local entities.”
EPA categorical grants provide much of the funding for
state and tribal implementation, focusing on specific
environmental media, wastes, or pollution sources. The
President proposed to reduce total funding for these grants
from $1.07 billion in FY2017 to $597.3 million in FY2018.
P.L. 115-141 provided $1.08 billion for EPA categorical
grants in FY2018. P.L. 115-123 provided an additional
$50.0 million in emergency supplemental appropriations for
hazardous waste financial assistance categorical grants (and
management of solid wastes) to assist states affected by
Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria.
The President’s request to reduce funding for the
remediation of Superfund sites was also an issue. The
President proposed to reduce the Superfund account from
$1.09 billion in FY2017 to $762.1 million in FY2018. P.L.
115-141 provided $1.15 billion for the Superfund account,
including $1.09 billion in Division G, Title II, and $63.0
million in Title IV (§430). P.L. 115-123 provided $6.2
million in emergency supplemental appropriations to
address impacts at Superfund sites affected by Hurricanes
Harvey, Irma, and Maria. P.L. 115-123 also provided $7.0
million for the LUST account to address impacts from the
hurricanes at petroleum underground storage tank sites.
Combined, Titles II and IV, Division G, of P.L. 115-141
provided more funding than the FY2017 enacted and
FY2018 requested levels for EPA water infrastructure. Title
II provided $1.39 billion for Clean Water State Revolving
Fund (SRF) capitalization grants, the same as enacted for
FY2017; $863.2 million for Drinking Water SRF
capitalization grants, $100.0 million less than the FY2017
enacted level; and $10.0 million for the WIFIA program
account, $20.0 million below the FY2017 enacted level.
Title IV (§430) provided an additional $600.0 million
($300.0 million each) for Clean Water and Drinking Water
SRF capitalization grants and $53.0 million for the WIFIA
program account. Title IV included $50.0 million for grants
authorized in the Water Infrastructure Improvement for the
Nation Act (P.L. 114-322), for which funding had not
previously been appropriated.
P.L. 115-141 also continued funding in FY2018 for water
quality restoration programs in specific geographic areas
that the President proposed to eliminate, including the Great
Lakes Restoration Initiative, Chesapeake Bay program,
Long Island Sound program, National Estuary
Program/Coastal Waterways, and several other specific
water bodies. P.L. 115-141 funded most of these programs
at the FY2017 enacted level and increased funding for the
restoration of Long Island Sound, Gulf of Mexico, and
Lake Champlain. Funding for these programs constituted
over half of the requested decrease for the EPM account.
Funding for scientific research to inform EPA regulatory
decisions and standard-setting was also an issue in the
FY2018 appropriations debate. P.L. 115-141 provided
$706.5 million for the S&T account, continuing funding at
the FY2017 enacted level. The President had proposed to
reduce funding for this account to $450.8 million.
Agency Staffing
Although Congress does not set specific staffing levels for
EPA in annual appropriations acts, the size and structure of
the agency’s workforce was a topic of debate for FY2018.
P.L. 115-141 did not fund the President’s request for EPA
“workforce reshaping.” The Explanatory Statement also
expressed the expectation that EPA would not “consolidate
or close any regional offices in fiscal year 2018.”
Regulatory Prohibitions
Several EPA regulatory actions also received attention.
Division G, Title IV, of P.L. 115-141 prohibited the use of
FY2018 appropriations for certain actions, including the
permitting of air emissions from livestock production
(§416), reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from manure
management systems (§417), regulating the lead content of
ammunition or fishing tackle (§418), permitting of
discharges of dredged or fill material for certain agricultural
activities (§432), and regulating air emissions from small
remote solid waste incinerators in Alaska (§433). Although
P.L. 115-141 prohibited funding in FY2018 for these
actions, EPA has not pursued rulemaking in some of these
areas to date (e.g., lead content of ammunition or fishing
tackle). Division S, Title XI (“FARM Act”), also exempted
farms from statutory requirements to report air releases of
hazardous substances emitted from animal waste.
Program Reauthorizations
P.L. 115-141 reauthorized two EPA programs. Division M,
Title IV, extended the collection and use of fees under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
through the end of FY2018. These fees augment
appropriations for the regulation of pesticides. Division N
(“BUILD Act”) reauthorized appropriations of $250.0
million annually from FY2019 to FY2023 for the EPA
Brownfields program, amended the grant criteria and
eligibility, and provided liability relief for certain categories
of parties. P.L. 115-141 funded the Brownfields program in
FY2018 at the FY2017 enacted level of $153.3 million.
Robert Esworthy, Specialist in Environmental Policy
David M. Bearden, Specialist in Environmental Policy
IF10717
https://crsreports.congress.gov
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) FY2018 Appropriations: Congressional Action
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10717 · VERSION 7 · UPDATED
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.