Final Draft: 03.07.2025
Court rules
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
1
Rule 26. General provisions governing disclosure and discovery.
2
Effective: 5/7/20255/4/2022
3
(a) Disclosure. This rule applies unless changed or supplemented by a rule governing
4
disclosure and discovery in a practice area.
5
(1) Initial disclosures. Except in cases exempt under paragraph (a)(3), a party must,
6
without waiting for a discovery request, serve on the other parties:
7
(A) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of:
8
(i) each individual likely to have discoverable information supporting its
9
claims or defenses, unless solely for impeachment, identifying the subjects of
10
the information; and
11
(ii) each fact witness the party may call in its case-in-chief and, except for an
12
adverse party, a summary of the expected testimony;
13
(B) a copy of all documents, data compilations, electronically stored information,
14
and tangible things in the possession or control of the party that the party may
15
offer in its case-in-chief, except charts, summaries, and demonstrative exhibits
16
that have not yet been prepared and must be disclosed in accordance with
17
paragraph (a)(5);
18
(C) a computation of any damages claimed and a copy of all discoverable
19
documents or evidentiary material on which such computation is based,
20
including materials about the nature and extent of injuries suffered;
21
(D) a copy of any agreement under which any person may be liable to satisfy
22
part or all of a judgment or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to
23
satisfy the judgment; and
24
(E) a copy of all documents to which a party refers in its pleadings.
25
(2) Timing of initial disclosures. The disclosures required by paragraph (a)(1) must
26
be served on the other parties:
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
27
(A) by a plaintiff within 14 days after the filing of the first answer to that
28
plaintiff’s complaint; and
29
(B) by a defendant within 42 days after the filing of that defendant’s first answer
30
to the complaint.
31
(3) Exemptions.
32
(A) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to by the parties, the
33
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) do not apply to actions:
34
(i) for judicial review of adjudicative proceedings or rule making proceedings
35
of an administrative agency;
36
(ii) governed by Rule 65B or Rule 65C;
37
(iii) to enforce an arbitration award; or
38
(iv) for water rights general adjudication under Utah Code Title 73, Chapter
39
4, Determination of Water Rights.
40
(B) In an exempt action, the matters subject to disclosure under paragraph (a)(1)
41
are subject to discovery under paragraph (b).
42
(4) Expert testimony.
43
(A) Disclosure of retained expert testimony. A party must, without waiting for a
44
discovery request, serve on the other parties the following information regarding
45
any person who may be used at trial to present evidence under Rule702 of the
46
Utah Rules of Evidence and who is retained or specially employed to provide
47
expert testimony in the case or whose duties as an employee of the party
48
regularly involve giving expert testimony: (i) the expert’s name and
49
qualifications, including a list of all publications authored within the preceding
50
10 years, and a list of any other cases in which the expert has testified as an
51
expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years, (ii) a brief
52
summary of the opinions to which the witness is expected to testify, (iii) the facts,
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
53
data, and other information specific to the case that will be relied upon by the
54
witness in forming those opinions, and (iv) the compensation to be paid for the
55
witness’s study and testimony.
56
(B) Limits on expert discovery. Further discovery may be obtained from an
57
expert witness either by deposition or by written report. A deposition must not
58
exceed four hours and the party taking the deposition must pay the expert’s
59
reasonable hourly fees for attendance at the deposition. A report must be signed
60
by the expert and must contain a complete statement of all opinions the expert
61
will offer at trial and the basis and reasons for them. Such an expert may not
62
testify in a party’s case-in-chief concerning any matter not fairly disclosed in the
63
report. The party offering the expert must pay the costs for the report.
64
(C) Timing for expert discovery.
65
(i) The party who bears the burden of proof on the issue for which expert
66
testimony is offered must serve on the other parties the information required
67
by paragraph (a)(4)(A) within 14 days after the close of fact discovery. Within
68
14 days thereafter, the party opposing the expert may serve notice electing
69
either a deposition of the expert pursuant to paragraph (a)(4)(B) and Rule 30,
70
or a written report pursuant to paragraph (a)(4)(B). The deposition must
71
occur, or the report must be served on the other parties, within 42 days after
72
the election is served on the other parties. If no election is served on the other
73
parties, then no further discovery of the expert must be permitted.
74
(ii) The party who does not bear the burden of proof on the issue for which
75
expert testimony is offered must serve on the other parties the information
76
required by paragraph (a)(4)(A) within 14 days after the later of (A) the date
77
on which the disclosure under paragraph (a)(4)(C)(i) is due, or (B) service of
78
the written report or the taking of the expert’s deposition pursuant to
79
paragraph (a)(4)(C)(i). Within 14 days thereafter, the party opposing the
80
expert may serve notice electing either a deposition of the expert pursuant to
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
81
paragraph (a)(4)(B) and Rule 30, or a written report pursuant to paragraph
82
(a)(4)(B). The deposition must occur, or the report must be served on the
83
other parties, within 42 days after the election is served on the other parties. If
84
no election is served on the other parties, then no further discovery of the
85
expert must be permitted.
86
(iii) If the party who bears the burden of proof on an issue wants to designate
87
rebuttal expert witnesses, it must serve on the other parties the information
88
required by paragraph (a)(4)(A) within 14 days after the later of (A) the date
89
on which the election under paragraph (a)(4)(C)(ii) is due or (B) service of the
90
written report or the taking of the expert’s deposition pursuant to paragraph
91
(a)(4)(C)(ii). Within 14 days thereafter, the party opposing the expert may
92
serve notice electing either a deposition of the expert pursuant to paragraph
93
(a)(4)(B) and Rule 30, or a written report pursuant to paragraph (a)(4)(B). The
94
deposition must occur, or the report must be served on the other parties,
95
within 42 days after the election is served on the other parties. If no election is
96
served on the other parties, then no further discovery of the expert must be
97
permitted. The court may preclude an expert disclosed only as a rebuttal
98
expert from testifying in the case in chief.
99
(D) Multiparty actions. In multiparty actions, all parties opposing the expert
100
must agree on either a report or a deposition. If all parties opposing the expert do
101
not agree, then further discovery of the expert may be obtained only by
102
deposition pursuant to paragraph (a)(4)(B) and Rule 30.
103
(E) Summary of non-retained expert testimony. If a party intends to present
104
evidence at trial under Rule 702 of the Utah Rules of Evidence from any person
105
other than an expert witness who is retained or specially employed to provide
106
testimony in the case or a person whose duties as an employee of the party
107
regularly involve giving expert testimony, that party must serve on the other
108
parties a written summary of the facts and opinions to which the witness is
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
109
expected to testify in accordance with the deadlines set forth in paragraph
110
(a)(4)(C). Such a witness cannot be required to provide a report pursuant to
111
paragraph (a)(4)(B). A deposition of such a witness may not exceed four hours
112
and, unless manifest injustice would result, the party taking the deposition must
113
pay the expert's reasonable hourly fees for attendance at the deposition.
114
(5) Pretrial disclosures.
115
(A) A party must, without waiting for a discovery request, serve on the other
116
parties:
117
(i) the name and, if not previously provided, the address and telephone
118
number of each witness, unless solely for impeachment, separately
119
identifying witnesses the party will call and witnesses the party may call;
120
(ii) the name of witnesses whose testimony is expected to be presented by
121
transcript of a deposition;
122
(iii) designations of the proposed deposition testimony; and
123
(iv) a copy of each exhibit, including charts, summaries, and demonstrative
124
exhibits, unless solely for impeachment, separately identifying those which
125
the party will offer and those which the party may offer.
126
(B) Disclosure required by paragraph (a)(5)(A) must be served on the other
127
parties at least 28 days before trial. Disclosures required by paragraph (a)(5)(A)(i)
128
and (a)(5)(A)(ii) must also be filed on the date that they are served. At least 14
129
days before trial, a party must serve any counter designations of deposition
130
testimony and any objections and grounds for the objections to the use of any
131
deposition, witness, or exhibit if the grounds for the objection are apparent
132
before trial. Other than objections under Rules 402 and 403 of the Utah Rules of
133
Evidence, other objections not listed are waived unless excused by the court for
134
good cause.
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
135
(6) Form of disclosure and discovery production. Rule 34 governs the form in
136
which all documents, data compilations, electronically stored information, tangible
137
things, and evidentiary material should be produced under this Rule.
138
(b) Discovery scope.
139
(1) In general. Parties may discover any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to
140
the claim or defense of any party if the discovery satisfies the standards of
141
proportionality set forth below.
142
(2) Privileged matters.
143
(A)Privileged matters that are not discoverable or admissible in any proceeding
144
of any kind or character include:
145
(i) all information in any form provided during and created specifically as
146
part of a request for an investigation, the investigation, findings, or
147
conclusions of peer review, care review, or quality assurance processes of any
148
organization of health care providers as defined in Utah Code Title 78B,
149
Chapter 3, Part 4, Utah Health Care Malpractice Act, for the purpose of
150
evaluating care provided to reduce morbidity and mortality or to improve the
151
quality of medical care, or for the purpose of peer review of the ethics,
152
competence, or professional conduct of any health care provider; and
153
(ii) except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(C), (D), or (E), all communications,
154
materials, and information in any form specifically created for or during a
155
medical candor process under Utah Code Title 78B, Chapter 3, Part 4a, Utah
156
Medical Candor Act, including any findings or conclusions from the
157
investigation and any offer of compensation.
158
(B) Disclosure or use in a medical candor process of any communication,
159
material, or information in any form that contains any information described in
160
paragraph (b)(2)(A)(i) does not waive any privilege or protection against
161
admissibility or discovery of the information under paragraph (b)(2)(A)(i).
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
162
(C) Any communication, material, or information in any form that is made or
163
provided in the ordinary course of business, including a medical record or a
164
business record, that is otherwise discoverable or admissible and is not created
165
for or during a medical candor process is not privileged by the use or disclosure
166
of the communication, material or information during a medical candor process.
167
(D) (i) Any information that is required to be documented in a patient’s medical
168
record under state or federal law is not privileged by the use or disclosure of the
169
information during a medical candor process.
170
(ii) Information described in paragraph (b)(2)(D)(i) does not include an
171
individual’s mental impressions, conclusions, or opinions that are formed
172
outside the course and scope of the patient’s care and treatment and are used
173
or disclosed in a medical candor process.
174
(E) (i) Any communication, material or information in any form that is provided
175
to an affected party before the affected party’s written agreement to participate
176
in a medical candor process is not privileged by the use or disclosure of the
177
communication, material, or information during a medical candor process.
178
(ii) Any communication, material, or information described in paragraph
179
(b)(2)(E)(i) does not include a written notice described in Utah Code section
180
78B-3-452.
181
(F) The terms defined in Utah Code section 78B-3-450 apply to paragraphs
182
(b)(2)(A)(ii), (B), (C), (D), and (E).
183
(G) Nothing in this paragraph (b)(2) shall prevent a party from raising any other
184
privileges provided by law or rule as to the admissibility or discovery of any
185
communication, information, or material described in paragraph (b)(2)(A), (B),
186
(C), (D), or (E).
187
(3) Proportionality. Discovery and discovery requests are proportional if:
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
188
(A) the discovery is reasonable, considering the needs of the case, the amount in
189
controversy, the complexity of the case, the parties' resources, the importance of
190
the issues, and the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues;
191
(B) the likely benefits of the proposed discovery outweigh the burden or expense;
192
(C) the discovery is consistent with the overall case management and will further
193
the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of the case;
194
(D) the discovery is not unreasonably cumulative or duplicative;
195
(E) the information cannot be obtained from another source that is more
196
convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; and
197
(F) the party seeking discovery has not had sufficient opportunity to obtain the
198
information by discovery or otherwise, taking into account the parties’ relative
199
access to the information.
200
(4) Burden. The party seeking discovery always has the burden of showing
201
proportionality and relevance. To ensure proportionality, the court may enter orders
202
under Rule 37.
203
(5) Electronically stored information. A party claiming that electronically stored
204
information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost must
205
describe the source of the electronically stored information, the nature and extent of
206
the burden, the nature of the information not provided, and any other information
207
that will enable other parties to evaluate the claim.
208
(6) Trial preparation materials. A party may obtain otherwise discoverable
209
documents and tangible things prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or
210
for another party or by or for that other party's representative (including the party’s
211
attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent) only upon a showing that
212
the party seeking discovery has substantial need of the materials and that the party
213
is unable without undue hardship to obtain substantially equivalent materials by
214
other means. In ordering discovery of such materials, the court must protect against
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
215
disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an
216
attorney or other representative of a party.
217
(7) Statement previously made about the action. A party may obtain without the
218
showing required in paragraph (b)(5) a statement concerning the action or its subject
219
matter previously made by that party. Upon request, a person not a party may
220
obtain without the required showing a statement about the action or its subject
221
matter previously made by that person. If the request is refused, the person may
222
move for a court order under Rule 37. A statement previously made is (A) a written
223
statement signed or approved by the person making it, or (B) a stenographic,
224
mechanical, electronic, or other recording, or a transcription thereof, which is a
225
substantially verbatim recital of an oral statement by the person making it and
226
contemporaneously recorded.
227
(8) Trial preparation; experts.
228
(A) Trial-preparation protection for draft reports or disclosures. Paragraph
229
(b)(6) protects drafts of any report or disclosure required under paragraph (a)(4),
230
regardless of the form in which the draft is recorded.
231
(B) Trial-preparation protection for communications between a party’s
232
attorney and expert witnesses. Paragraph (b)(6) protects communications
233
between the party’s attorney and any witness required to provide disclosures
234
under paragraph (a)(4), regardless of the form of the communications, except to
235
the extent that the communications:
236
(i) relate to compensation for the expert’s study or testimony;
237
(ii) identify facts or data that the party’s attorney provided and that the expert
238
considered in forming the opinions to be expressed; or
239
(iii) identify assumptions that the party’s attorney provided and that the
240
expert relied on in forming the opinions to be expressed.
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
241
(C) Expert employed only for trial preparation. Ordinarily, a party may not, by
242
interrogatories or otherwise, discover facts known or opinions held by an expert
243
who has been retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation of
244
litigation or to prepare for trial and who is not expected to be called as a witness
245
at trial. A party may do so only:
246
(i) as provided in Rule 35(b); or
247
(ii) on showing exceptional circumstances under which it is impracticable for
248
the party to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other means.
249
(9) Claims of privilege or protection of trial preparation materials.
250
(A) Information withheld. If a party withholds discoverable information by
251
claiming that it is privileged or prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial,
252
the party must make the claim expressly and must describe the nature of the
253
documents, communications, or things not produced in a manner that, without
254
revealing the information itself, will enable other parties to evaluate the claim.
255
(B) Information produced. If a party produces information that the party claims
256
is privileged or prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial, the producing
257
party may notify any receiving party of the claim and the basis for it. After being
258
notified, a receiving party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the
259
specified information and any copies it has and may not use or disclose the
260
information until the claim is resolved. A receiving party may promptly present
261
the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. If the
262
receiving party disclosed the information before being notified, it must take
263
reasonable steps to retrieve it. The producing party must preserve the
264
information until the claim is resolved.
265
(C) Information disclosed in legislative audit. If a party is an entity that is
266
subject to an audit by the legislative auditor general under Utah Constitution,
267
Article VI, Section 33, and information that is privileged or prepared in
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
268
anticipation of litigation or for trial is disclosed to the legislative auditor general
269
or an arbitrator as described in Utah Code section 36-12-15, the disclosure to the
270
legislative auditor general or the arbitrator does not make the information
271
discoverable or prevent the party from claiming that the information is
272
privileged and prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial.
273
(c) Methods, sequence, and timing of discovery; tiers; limits on standard discovery;
274
extraordinary discovery.
275
(1) Methods of discovery. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the
276
following methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written
277
interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land
278
or other property, for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental
279
examinations; requests for admission; and subpoenas other than for a court hearing
280
or trial.
281
(2) Sequence and timing of discovery. Methods of discovery may be used in any
282
sequence, and the fact that a party is conducting discovery must not delay any other
283
party's discovery. Except for cases exempt under paragraph (a)(3), a party may not
284
seek discovery from any source before that party’s initial disclosure obligations are
285
satisfied.
286
(3) Definition of tiers for standard discovery. Actions claiming $50,000 or less in
287
damages are permitted standard discovery as described for Tier 1. Actions claiming
288
more than $50,000 and less than $300,000 in damages are permitted standard
289
discovery as described for Tier 2. Actions claiming $300,000 or more in damages are
290
permitted standard discovery as described for Tier 3. Absent an accompanying
291
damage claim for more than $300,000, actions claiming non-monetary relief are
292
permitted standard discovery as described for Tier 2. Domestic relations actions are
293
permitted standard discovery as described for Tier 4.
294
(4) Definition of damages. For purposes of determining standard discovery, the
295
amount of damages includes the total of all monetary damages sought (without
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
296
duplication for alternative theories) by all parties in all claims for relief in the
297
original pleadings.
298
(5) Limits on standard fact discovery. Standard fact discovery per side (plaintiffs
299
collectively, defendants collectively, and third-party defendants collectively) in each
300
tier is as follows. The days to complete standard fact discovery are calculated from
301
the date the first defendant’s first disclosure is due and do not include expert
302
discovery under paragraphs (a)(4)(C) and (D).
Tier Amount of
Damages
Total Fact
Rule 33
Rule 34
Rule 36
Days to
Deposition Interrogatories
Requests for Requests for Complete
Hours
Production Admission Standard
including all
discrete subparts
Fact
Discovery
1
$50,000 or
3
0
5
5
120
15
10
10
10
180
30
20
20
20
210
4
10
10
10
90
less
2
More than
$50,000 and
less than
$300,000 or
nonmonetary
relief
3
$300,00 or
more
4
Domestic
relations
actions
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
303
304
(6) Extraordinary discovery. To obtain discovery beyond the limits established in
305
paragraph (c)(5), a party must:
306
(A) before the close of standard discovery and after reaching the limits of
307
standard discovery imposed by these rules, file a stipulated statement that
308
extraordinary discovery is necessary and proportional under paragraph (b)(2)
309
and, for each party represented by an attorney, a statement that the attorney
310
consulted with the client about the request for extraordinary discovery;
311
(B) before the close of standard discovery and after reaching the limits of
312
standard discovery imposed by these rules, file a request for extraordinary
313
discovery under Rule 37(a) or
314
(C) obtain an expanded discovery schedule under Rule 100A.
315
(d) Requirements for disclosure or response; disclosure or response by an
316
organization; failure to disclose; initial and supplemental disclosures and responses.
317
(1) A party must make disclosures and responses to discovery based on the
318
information then known or reasonably available to the party.
319
(2) If the party providing disclosure or responding to discovery is a corporation,
320
partnership, association, or governmental agency, the party must act through one or
321
more officers, directors, managing agents, or other persons, who must make
322
disclosures and responses to discovery based on the information then known or
323
reasonably available to the party.
324
(3) A party is not excused from making disclosures or responses because the party
325
has not completed investigating the case, the party challenges the sufficiency of
326
another party's disclosures or responses, or another party has not made disclosures
327
or responses.
328
(4) If a party fails to disclose or to supplement timely a disclosure or response to
329
discovery, that party may not use the undisclosed witness, document, or material at
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
330
any hearing or trial unless the failure is harmless or the party shows good cause for
331
the failure.
332
(5) If a party learns that a disclosure or response is incomplete or incorrect in some
333
important way, the party must timely serve on the other parties the additional or
334
correct information if it has not been made known to the other parties. The
335
supplemental disclosure or response must state why the additional or correct
336
information was not previously provided.
337
(e) Signing discovery requests, responses, and objections. Every disclosure, request
338
for discovery, response to a request for discovery, and objection to a request for
339
discovery must be in writing and signed by at least one attorney of record or by the
340
party if the party is not represented. The signature of the attorney or party is a
341
certification under Rule11. If a request or response is not signed, the receiving party
342
does not need to take any action with respect to it. If a certification is made in violation
343
of the rule, the court, upon motion or upon its own initiative, may take any action
344
authorized by Rule11 or Rule37(b).
345
(f) Filing. Except as required by these rules or ordered by the court, a party must not
346
file with the court a disclosure, a request for discovery, or a response to a request for
347
discovery, but must file only the certificate of service stating that the disclosure, request
348
for discovery, or response has been served on the other parties and the date of service.
349
350
Advisory Committee Notes
351
Note Adopted 2011
352
Disclosure requirements and timing. Rule 26(a)(1).
353
Not all information will be known at the outset of a case. If discovery is serving its
354
proper purpose, additional witnesses, documents, and other information will be
355
identified. The scope and the level of detail required in the initial Rule 26(a)(1)
356
disclosures should be viewed in light of this reality. A party is not required to interview
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
357
every witness it ultimately may call at trial in order to provide a summary of the
358
witness’s expected testimony. As the information becomes known, it should be
359
disclosed. No summaries are required for adverse parties, including management level
360
employees of business entities, because opposing lawyers are unable to interview them
361
and their testimony is available to their own counsel. For uncooperative or hostile
362
witnesses any summary of expected testimony would necessarily be limited to the
363
subject areas the witness is reasonably expected to testify about. For example, defense
364
counsel may be unable to interview a treating physician, so the initial summary may
365
only disclose that the witness will be questioned concerning the plaintiff’s diagnosis,
366
treatment and prognosis. After medical records have been obtained, the summary may
367
be expanded or refined.
368
Subject to the foregoing qualifications, the summary of the witness’s expected testimony
369
should be just that– a summary. The rule does not require prefiled testimony or detailed
370
descriptions of everything a witness might say at trial. On the other hand, it requires
371
more than the broad, conclusory statements that often were made under the prior
372
version of Rule 26(a)(1)(e.g., “The witness will testify about the events in question” or
373
“The witness will testify on causation.”). The intent of this requirement is to give the
374
other side basic information concerning the subjects about which the witness is
375
expected to testify at trial, so that the other side may determine the witness’s relative
376
importance in the case, whether the witness should be interviewed or deposed, and
377
whether additional documents or information concerning the witness should be
378
sought. See RJW Media Inc. v. Heath, 2017 UT App 34, ¶¶ 23-25, 392 P.3d 956. This
379
information is important because of the other discovery limits contained in Rule 26.
380
Likewise, the documents that should be provided as part of the Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures
381
are those that a party reasonably believes it may use at trial, understanding that not all
382
documents will be available at the outset of a case. In this regard, it is important to
383
remember that the duty to provide documents and witness information is a continuing
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
384
one, and disclosures must be promptly supplemented as new evidence and witnesses
385
become known as the case progresses.
386
Early disclosure of damages information is important. Among other things, it is a
387
critical factor in determining proportionality. The committee recognizes that damages
388
often require additional discovery, and typically are the subject of expert testimony. The
389
Rule is not intended to require expert disclosures at the outset of a case. At the same
390
time, the subject of damages should not simply be deferred until expert discovery.
391
Parties should make a good faith attempt to compute damages to the extent it is
392
possible to do so and must in any event provide all discoverable information on the
393
subject, including materials related to the nature and extent of the damages.
394
The penalty for failing to make timely disclosures is that the evidence may not be used
395
in the party’s case-in-chief. To make the disclosure requirement meaningful, and to
396
discourage sandbagging, parties must know that if they fail to disclose important
397
information that is helpful to their case, they will not be able to use that information at
398
trial. The courts will be expected to enforce them unless the failure is harmless or the
399
party shows good cause for the failure.
400
The purpose of early disclosure is to have all parties present the evidence they expect to
401
use to prove their claims or defenses, thereby giving the opposing party the ability to
402
better evaluate the case and determine what additional discovery is necessary and
403
proportional.
404
Expert disclosures and timing. Rule 26(a)(3). Disclosure of the identity and subjects of
405
expert opinions and testimony is automatic under Rule 26(a)(3) and parties are not
406
required to serve interrogatories or use other discovery devices to obtain this
407
information.
408
Experts frequently will prepare demonstrative exhibits or other aids to illustrate the
409
expert’s testimony at trial, and the costs for preparing these materials can be substantial.
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
410
For that reason, these types of demonstrative aids may be prepared and disclosed later,
411
as part of the Rule 26(a)(4) pretrial disclosures when trial is imminent.
412
If a party elects a written report, the expert must provide a signed report containing a
413
complete statement of all opinions the expert will express and the basis and reasons for
414
them. The intent is not to require a verbatim transcript of exactly what the expert will
415
say at trial; instead the expert must fairly disclose the substance of and basis for each
416
opinion the expert will offer. The expert may not testify in a party’s case in chief
417
concerning any matter that is not fairly disclosed in the report. To achieve the goal of
418
making reports a reliable substitute for depositions, courts are expected to enforce this
419
requirement. If a party elects a deposition, rather than a report, it is up to the party to
420
ask the necessary questions to “lock in” the expert’s testimony. But the expert is
421
expected to be fully prepared on all aspects of his/her trial testimony at the time of the
422
deposition and may not leave the door open for additional testimony by qualifying
423
answers to deposition questions.
424
There are a number of difficulties inherent in disclosing expert testimony that may be
425
offered from fact witnesses. First, there is often not a clear line between fact and expert
426
testimony. Many fact witnesses have scientific, technical or other specialized
427
knowledge, and their testimony about the events in question often will cross into the
428
area of expert testimony. The rules are not intended to erect artificial barriers to the
429
admissibility of such testimony. Second, many of these fact witnesses will not be within
430
the control of the party who plans to call them at trial. These witnesses may not be
431
cooperative, and may not be willing to discuss opinions they have with counsel. Where
432
this is the case, disclosures will necessarily be more limited. On the other hand,
433
consistent with the overall purpose of the 2011 amendments, a party should receive
434
advance notice if their opponent will solicit expert opinions from a particular witness so
435
they can plan their case accordingly. In an effort to strike an appropriate balance, the
436
rules require that such witnesses be identified and the information about their
437
anticipated testimony should include that which is required under Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(ii),
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
438
which should include any opinion testimony that a party expects to elicit from them at
439
trial. If a party has disclosed possible opinion testimony in its Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(ii)
440
disclosures, that party is not required to prepare a separate Rule 26 (a)(4)(E) disclosure
441
for the witness. And if that disclosure is made in advance of the witness’s deposition,
442
those opinions should be explored in the deposition and not in a separate expert
443
deposition. Otherwise, the timing for disclosure of non-retained expert opinions is the
444
same as that for retained experts under Rule 26(a)(4)(C) and depends on whether the
445
party has the burden of proof or is responding to another expert.
446
Scope of discovery—Proportionality. Rule 26(b). Proportionality is the principle
447
governing the scope of discovery. Simply stated, it means that the cost of discovery
448
should be proportional to what is at stake in the litigation.
449
In the past, the scope of discovery was governed by “relevance” or the “likelihood to
450
lead to discovery of admissible evidence.” These broad standards may have secured
451
just results by allowing a party to discover all facts relevant to the litigation. However,
452
they did little to advance two equally important objectives of the rules of civil
453
procedure—the speedy and inexpensive resolution of every action. Accordingly, the
454
former standards governing the scope of discovery have been replaced with the
455
proportionality standards in subpart (b)(1).
456
The concept of proportionality is not new. The prior rule permitted the Court to limit
457
discovery methods if it determined that “the discovery was unduly burdensome or
458
expensive, taking into account the needs of the case, the amount in controversy,
459
limitations on the parties’ resources, and the importance of the issues at stake in the
460
litigation.” The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contains a similar provision. See Fed.
461
R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2) (C).
462
Any system of rules which permits the facts and circumstances of each case to inform
463
procedure cannot eliminate uncertainty. Ultimately, the trial court has broad discretion
464
in deciding whether a discovery request is proportional. The proportionality standards
465
in subpart (b)(2) and the discovery tiers in subpart (c) mitigate uncertainty by guiding
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
466
that discretion. The proper application of the proportionality standards will be defined
467
over time by trial and appellate courts.
468
Standard and extraordinary discovery. Rule 26(c). As a counterpart to requiring more
469
detailed disclosures under Rule 26(a), the 2011 amendments place new limitations on
470
additional discovery the parties may conduct. Because the committee expects the
471
enhanced disclosure requirements will automatically permit each party to learn the
472
witnesses and evidence the opposing side will offer in its case-in-chief, additional
473
discovery should serve the more limited function of permitting parties to find
474
witnesses, documents, and other evidentiary materials that are harmful, rather than
475
helpful, to the opponent’s case.
476
Parties are expected to be reasonable and accomplish as much as they can during
477
standard discovery. A statement of discovery issues may result in additional discovery
478
and sanctions at the expense of a party who unreasonably fails to respond or otherwise
479
frustrates discovery. After the expiration of the applicable time limitation, a case is
480
presumed to be ready for trial. Actions for nonmonetary relief, such as injunctive relief,
481
are subject to the standard discovery limitations of Tier 2, absent an accompanying
482
monetary claim of $300,000 or more, in which case Tier 3 applies.
483
Consequences of failure to disclose.Rule 26(d). If a party fails to disclose or to
484
supplement timely its discovery responses, that party cannot use the undisclosed
485
witness, document, or material at any hearing or trial, absent proof that non-disclosure
486
was harmless or justified by good cause. More complete disclosures increase the
487
likelihood that the case will be resolved justly, speedily, and inexpensively. Not being
488
able to use evidence that a party fails properly to disclose provides a powerful incentive
489
to make complete disclosures. This is true only if trial courts hold parties to this
490
standard. Accordingly, although a trial court retains discretion to determine how
491
properly to address this issue in a given case, the usual and expected result should be
492
exclusion of the evidence.
493
Legislative Note
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
494
Note adopted 2012
495
S.J.R. 15
496
(1) The amended language in paragraph (b)(1) is intended to incorporate long-standing
497
protections against discovery and admission into evidence of privileged matters
498
connected to medical care review and peer review into the Utah Rules of Civil
499
Procedure. These privileges, found in both Utah common law and statute, include
500
Sections 26-25-3, 58-13-4, and 58-13-5, UCA, 1953. The language is intended to ensure
501
the confidentiality of peer review, care review, and quality assurance processes and to
502
ensure that the privilege is limited only to documents and information created
503
specifically as part of the processes. It does not extend to knowledge gained or
504
documents created outside or independent of the processes. The language is not
505
intended to limit the court's existing ability, if it chooses, to review contested documents
506
in camera in order to determine whether the documents fall within the privilege. The
507
language is not intended to alter any existing law, rule, or regulation relating to the
508
confidentiality, admissibility, or disclosure of proceedings before the Utah Division of
509
Occupational and Professional Licensing. The Legislature intends that these privileges
510
apply to all pending and future proceedings governed by court rules, including
511
administrative proceedings regarding licensing and reimbursement.
512
(2) The Legislature does not intend that the amendments to this rule be construed to
513
change or alter a final order concerning discovery matters entered on or before the
514
effective date of this amendment.
515
(3) The Legislature intends to give the greatest effect to its amendment, as legally
516
permissible, in matters that are pending on or may arise after the effective date of this
517
amendment, without regard to when the case was filed.
518
Effective date. Upon approval by a constitutional two-thirds vote of all members elected
519
to each house. [March 6, 2012]
URCP Rule 026
AMEND
Final Draft: 03.07.2025
520
The May 7, 2025 effective date is upon approval by a constitutional two-thirds vote of
521
all members elected to each house.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.