MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

Court rules

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 100 - MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, DEFINITIONS,

AND PREAMBLE OF THE CODE

Rule 18-100.1.

Rule 18-100.2.

Rule 18-100.3.

Rule 18-100.4.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

SCOPE

DEFINITIONS

PREAMBLE

RULES GOVERNING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY AND

THE AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-101.1.

Rule 18-101.2.

Rule 18-101.3.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW (ABA RULE 1.1)

PROMOTING CONFIDENCE IN THE JUDICIARY (ABA RULE

(1.2)

AVOIDING LENDING THE PRESTIGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICE

(ABA RULE 1.3)

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.1.

GIVING PRECEDENCE TO THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL

OFFICE (ABA RULE 2.1)

Rule 18-102.2. IMPARTIALITY AND FAIRNESS (ABA RULE 2.2)

Rule 18-102.3. BIAS, PREJUDICE, AND HARASSMENT (ABA RULE 2.3)

Rule 18-102.4. EXTERNAL INFLUENCE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (ABA RULE 2.4)

Rule 18-102.5. COMPETENCE, DILIGENCE, AND COOPERATION (ABA RULE 2.5)

Rule 18-102.6. ENSURING THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD (ABA RULE 2.6)

Rule 18-102.7. RESPONSIBILITY TO DECIDE (ABA RULE 2.7)

Rule 18-102.8. DECORUM, DEMEANOR, AND COMMUNICATION WITH JURORS

(ABA RULE 2.8)

Rule 18-102.9. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS (ABA RULE 2.9)

Rule 18-102.10. JUDICIAL STATEMENTS ON PENDING AND IMPENDING

CASES (ABA RULE 2.10)

Rule 18-102.11. DISQUALIFICATION (ABA RULE 2.11)

Rule 18-102.12. SUPERVISORY DUTIES (ABA RULE 2.12)

Rule 18-102.13. ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS (ABA RULE 2.13)

-1-

Rule 18-102.14.

Rule 18-102.15.

Rule 18-102.16.

DISABILITY AND IMPAIRMENT OF OTHERS (ABA RULE

2.14)

RESPONDING TO JUDICIAL AND ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT

(ABA RULE 2.15)

COOPERATION WITH DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITIES

(ABA RULE 2.16)

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.1.

EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITIES IN GENERAL

(ABA RULE 3.1)

Rule 18-103.2. APPEARANCES BEFORE GOVERNMENTAL BODIES AND

CONSULTATION WITH GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS (ABA

RULE 3.2)

Rule 18-103.3. TESTIFYING AS A CHARACTER WITNESS (ABA RULE 3.3)

Rule 18-103.4. APPOINTMENT TO GOVERNMENTAL POSITIONS (ABA

RULE 3.4)

Rule 18-103.5. USE OF NONPUBLIC INFORMATION (ABA RULE 3.5)

Rule 18-103.6. AFFILIATION WITH DISCRIMINATORY ORGANIZATIONS

(ABA RULE 3.6)

Rule 18-103.7. PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS,

CHARITABLE, FRATERNAL, OR CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS AND

ACTIVITIES (ABA RULE 3.7)

Rule 18-103.8. APPOINTMENTS TO FIDUCIARY POSITIONS (ABA RULE 3.8)

Rule 18-103.9. SERVICE AS ARBITRATOR OR MEDIATOR (ABA RULE 3.9)

Rule 18-103.10. PRACTICE OF LAW (ABA RULE 3.10)

Rule 18-103.11. FINANCIAL, BUSINESS, OR REMUNERATIVE ACTIVITIES

(ABA RULE 3.11)

Rule 18-103.12. COMPENSATION FOR EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES

ABA RULE 3.12)

Rule 18-103.13. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, LOANS, BEQUESTS, BENEFITS,

OR OTHER THINGS OF VALUE (ABA RULE 3.13)

Rule 18-103.14. REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND WAIVERS OF FEES OR

CHARGES (ABA RULE 3.14)

Rule 18-103.15. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (ABA RULE 3.15)

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-104.1.

Rule 18-104.2.

Rule 18-104.3.

Rule 18-104.4.

Rule 18-104.5.

DEFINITIONS (ABA RULE 4.1)

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF JUDGE WHO IS NOT A CANDIDATE

(ABA RULE 4.2)

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF APPLICANT (ABA RULE 4.3)

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF CANDIDATE FOR ELECTION

(ABA RULE 4.4)

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF DISTRICT COURT CANDIDATE FOR

RETENTION (ABA RULE 4.5)

-2-

Rule 18-104.6.

APPLICABILITY AND DISCIPLINE (ABA RULE 4.6)

CHAPTER 200 - MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, AND DEFINITIONS

Rule 18-200.1.

Rule 18-200.2.

Rule 18-200.3.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

SCOPE

DEFINITIONS

RULES GOVERNING INTEGRITY AND THE

AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-201.1.

Rule 18-201.2.

Rule 18-201.3.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW

PROMOTING CONFIDENCE IN THE JUDICIARY

AVOIDING LENDING THE PRESTIGE OF THE POSITION

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A

JUDICIAL APPOINTEE’S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.1. GIVING PRECEDENCE TO THE DUTIES OF POSITION

Rule 18-202.2. IMPARTIALITY AND FAIRNESS

Rule 18-202.3. BIAS, PREJUDICE, AND HARASSMENT

Rule 18-202.4. EXTERNAL INFLUENCES ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Rule 18-202.5. COMPETENCE, DILIGENCE, AND COOPERATION

Rule 18-206.6. ENSURING THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD

Rule 18-206.7. RESPONSIBILITY TO DECIDE

Rule 18-202.8. DECORUM AND DEMEANOR

Rule 18-202.9. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS

Rule 18-202.10. STATEMENTS ON PENDING AND IMPENDING CASES

Rule 18-202.11. DISQUALIFICATION

Rule 18-202.12. SUPERVISORY DUTIES

Rule 18-202.13. ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS

Rule 18-202.14. DISABILITY AND IMPAIRMENT OR OTHERS

Rule 18-202.15. RESPONDING TO JUDICIAL AND ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT

Rule 18-202.16. COOPERATION WITH DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITIES

RULES GOVERNING EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-203.1.

Rule 18-203.2.

Rule 18-203.3.

Rule 18-203.4.

Rule 18-203.5.

EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITIES IN GENERAL

APPEARANCES BEFORE GOVERNMENTAL BODIES AND

CONSULTATION WITH GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

TESTIFYING AS A CHARACTER WITNESS

APPOINTMENT TO GOVERNMENTAL POSITIONS

USE OF NONPUBLIC INFORMATION

-3-

Rule 18-203.6.

Rule 18-203.7.

AFFILIATION WITH DISCRIMINATORY ORGANIZATIONS

PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS,

CHARITABLE, FRATERNAL, OR CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS AND

ACTIVITIES

Rule 18-203.8. APPOINTMENTS TO FIDUCIARY POSITIONS

Rule 18-203.9. SERVICE AS ARBITRATOR OR MEDIATOR

Rule 18-203.10. PRACTICE OF LAW

Rule 18-203.11. FINANCIAL, BUSINESS, OR REMUNERATIVE ACTIVITIES

Rule 18-203.12. COMPENSATION FOR EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITIES

Rule 18-203.13. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, LOANS, BEQUESTS, BENEFITS,

OR OTHER THINGS OF VALUE

Rule 18-203.14. REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND WAIVERS OF FEES OR

CHARGES

Rule 18-203.15. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-204.1.

Rule 18-204.2.

Rule 18-204.3.

Rule 18-204.4.

Rule 18-204.5.

DEFINITIONS

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF JUDICIAL APPOINTEE WHO IS

NOT A CANDIDATE

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF APPLICANT

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF CANDIDATE FOR ELECTION

APPLICABILITY AND DISCIPLINE

CHAPTER 300 - JUDICIAL ETHICS COMMITTEE

Rule 18-301.

Rule 18-302.

Rule 18-303.

Rule 18-304.

Rule 18-305.

Rule 18-306.

Rule 18-307.

Rule 18-308.

DEFINITIONS

EXISTENCE; MEMBERSHIP; TERMS

CHAIR; VICE CHAIR; STAFF

MEETINGS; QUORUM

DUTIES

REQUEST FOR OPINION

OPINION; LETTER OF ADVICE

PROTECTION FROM CHARGE OF VIOLATION

CHAPTER 400 - JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE

Rule 18-401.

Rule 18-402.

Rule 18-403.

Rule 18-404.

Rule 18-405.

Rule 18-406.

Rule 18-407.

Rule 18-408.

DEFINITIONS

COMMISSION

JUDICIAL INQUIRY BOARD

COMPLAINTS; INITIAL REVIEW BY INVESTIGATIVE COUNSEL

PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION

FURTHER INVESTIGATION

DISPOSITION WITHOUT PROCEEDINGS ON CHARGES

FILING OF CHARGES; PROCEEDINGS BEFORE COMMISSION

-4-

CHAPTER 500 - MARRIAGE CEREMONIES

Rule 18-501.

Rule 18-502.

Rule 18-503.

Rule 18-504.

SCOPE OF CHAPTER

SCHEDULING

CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

RESTRICTIONS

CHAPTER 600 - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Rule 18-601.

Rule 18-602.

Rule 18-603.

Rule 18-604.

JUDICIAL LEAVE

REPORTS BY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT BY JUDGES

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT BY JUDICIAL

APPOINTEES

-5-

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 - MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, DEFINITIONS,

AND PREAMBLE OF THE CODE

Rule 18-100.1.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

(a) Source and Structure of the Code

(b) Interpretive Provisions

(1) Discipline

(2) Accompanying Comments

(3) Rules of Reason

(4) Collateral Effect

(5) Judicial Ethics Committee Opinion

Rule 18-100.2.

SCOPE

Rule 18-100.3.

DEFINITIONS

(a) Domestic Partner

(b) Fiduciary

(c) Gift

(d) Impartial

(e) Impending Matter

(f) Independence

(g) Knowingly

(h) Member of Judge’s or Candidate’s Family

(i) Member of Judge’s or Candidate’s Household

(j) Pending Matter

(k) Significant Financial Interest

(l) Third Degree of Relationship

Rule 18-100.4.

PREAMBLE

(a) Importance of Independent, Fair, Competent, Impartial

Judiciary

(b) Dignity of Judicial Office

(c) Function of Code of Judicial Conduct

-6-

RULES GOVERNING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY AND

THE AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-101.1.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW (ABA RULE 1.1)

Rule 18-101.2.

PROMOTING CONFIDENCE IN THE JUDICIARY (ABA RULE

(1.2)

(a) Promoting Public Confidence

(b) Avoiding Perception of Impropriety

Rule 18-101.3.

AVOIDING LENDING THE PRESTIGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICE

(ABA RULE 1.3)

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.1.

GIVING PRECEDENCE TO THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL

OFFICE (ABA RULE 2.1)

Rule 18-102.2.

IMPARTIALITY AND FAIRNESS (ABA RULE 2.2)

Rule 18-102.3.

BIAS, PREJUDICE, AND HARASSMENT (ABA RULE 2.3)

Rule 18-102.4.

EXTERNAL INFLUENCE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (ABA RULE 2.4)

Rule 18-102.5.

COMPETENCE, DILIGENCE, AND COOPERATION (ABA RULE 2.5)

Rule 18-102.6.

ENSURING THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD (ABA RULE 2.6)

Rule 18-102.7.

RESPONSIBILITY TO DECIDE (ABA RULE 2.7)

Rule 18-102.8.

DECORUM, DEMEANOR, AND COMMUNICATION WITH JURORS

(ABA RULE 2.8)

Rule 18-102.9.

EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS (ABA RULE 2.9)

Rule 18-102.10.

JUDICIAL STATEMENTS ON PENDING AND IMPENDING

CASES (ABA RULE 2.10)

Rule 18-102.11.

DISQUALIFICATION (ABA RULE 2.11)

Rule 18-102.12.

SUPERVISORY DUTIES (ABA RULE 2.12)

Rule 18-102.13.

ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS (ABA RULE 2.13)

Rule 18-102.14.

DISABILITY AND IMPAIRMENT OF OTHERS (ABA RULE

2.14)

-7-

Rule 18-102.15.

RESPONDING TO JUDICIAL AND ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT

(ABA RULE 2.15)

Rule 18-102.16.

COOPERATION WITH DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITIES

(ABA RULE 2.16)

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.1.

EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITIES IN GENERAL

(ABA RULE 3.1)

Rule 18-103.2.

APPEARANCES BEFORE GOVERNMENTAL BODIES AND

CONSULTATION WITH GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS (ABA

RULE 3.2)

Rule 18-103.3.

TESTIFYING AS A CHARACTER WITNESS (ABA RULE 3.3)

Rule 18-103.4.

APPOINTMENT TO GOVERNMENTAL POSITIONS (ABA

RULE 3.4)

Rule 18-103.5.

USE OF NONPUBLIC INFORMATION (ABA RULE 3.5)

Rule 18-103.6.

AFFILIATION WITH DISCRIMINATORY ORGANIZATIONS

(ABA RULE 3.6)

Rule 18-103.7.

PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS,

CHARITABLE, FRATERNAL, OR CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS AND

ACTIVITIES (ABA RULE 3.7)

Rule 18-103.8.

APPOINTMENTS TO FIDUCIARY POSITIONS (ABA RULE 3.8)

Rule 18-103.9.

SERVICE AS ARBITRATOR OR MEDIATOR (ABA RULE 3.9)

Rule 18-103.10.

PRACTICE OF LAW (ABA RULE 3.10)

(a) In General

(b) Exceptions

Rule 18-103.11.

FINANCIAL, BUSINESS, OR REMUNERATIVE ACTIVITIES

(ABA RULE 3.11)

Rule 18-103.12.

COMPENSATION FOR EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES

(ABA RULE 3.12)

Rule 18-103.13.

ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, LOANS, BEQUESTS, BENEFITS,

OR OTHER THINGS OF VALUE (ABA RULE 3.13)

-8-

Rule 18-103.14.

REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND WAIVERS OF FEES OR

CHARGES (ABA RULE 3.14)

Rule 18-103.15.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (ABA RULE 3.15)

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-104.1.

DEFINITIONS (ABA RULE 4.1)

(a) Applicant

(b) Candidate

(c) Candidate for Election

(d) District Court Candidate for Retention

(e) Political Organization

Rule 18-104.2.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF JUDGE WHO IS NOT A CANDIDATE

(ABA RULE 4.2)

Rule 18-104.3.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF APPLICANT (ABA RULE 4.3)

Rule 18-104.4.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF CANDIDATE FOR ELECTION

(ABA RULE 4.4)

Rule 18-104.5.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF DISTRICT COURT CANDIDATE FOR

RETENTION (ABA RULE 4.5)

Rule 18-104.6.

APPLICABILITY AND DISCIPLINE (ABA RULE 4.6)

-9-

Rule 18-100.1

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, DEFINITIONS, AND PREAMBLE OF THE CODE

Rule 18-100.1.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

(a) Source and Structure of the Code

The substantive provisions and much of the structure of

this Code are based in large part on the 2007 Model Code of

Judicial Conduct proposed by the American Bar Association (ABA

Model Code), although some of those provisions and some of the

style and organization of this Code differ from the ABA Model

Code.

Most of the differences are necessary for consistency with

the Maryland Constitution, Maryland statutes, and other Maryland

Rules.

Committee note: This Code is divided into five parts: an

introductory part consisting of Rules 18-100.1 through 18-100.4;

a part consisting of Rules 18-101.1 through 18-101.3 that deal

with judicial integrity and the avoidance of impropriety; a part

consisting of Rules 18-102.1 through 18-102.16 that deal with the

performance of judicial duties; a part consisting of Rules 18103.1 through 18-103.15 that deal generally with extrajudicial

activities; and a part consisting of Rules 18-104.1 through 18104.6 that deal with political activity.

This structure conforms generally to that of the ABA Model

Code but differs from the ABA Model Code in the following

principal respects:

(1) This Code assigns each Rule of Judicial Conduct a

Maryland Rule number but, so that the parallel will be obvious,

the Maryland Rule numbering conforms to that of the ABA Model

Code. Thus, for example, ABA Rule 1.1 (Compliance with the Law)

is Maryland Rule 18-101.1, which also is also captioned

“Compliance with the Law.”

-10-

Rule 18-100.1

(2) This Code consolidates and reorganizes the

Preamble, Scope, Application, and Terminology provisions of the

ABA Model Code into Rules 18-100.1 through 18-100.4. Although

the Preamble is aspirational in nature, the Scope, Application,

and Terminology provisions are more substantive and should be in

the form of Rules.

(3) The 2007 ABA Code proposed a new and much different

structure and format. The enforceable ethical commands in

previous Codes were stated in the form of specific Canons, to

which were appended interpretative Comments. The enforceable

ethical commands in the 2007 ABA Code are stated in the form of

Rules that are supplemented by interpretative Comments and headed

by very brief and general statements denominated as Canons.

The 2007 ABA Code acknowledges that a judge may be

disciplined only for violating a Rule, but it regards the Canons

as providing guidance in interpreting the Rules. That guidance,

however, is more precisely the function of the Comments under

each Rule. The Canons themselves appear to be merely descriptive

of the subject matter of the Rules. To avoid any ambiguity over

the significance of the Canons and to make clear that attention

must be focused on the Rules and the Comments, this Code

eliminates the Canons and uses instead a descriptive statement of

the Rules in each part.

(4) The 2007 ABA Code contains provisions regarding

political activity and financial disclosure by judges. This Code

reorganizes those provisions and conforms them to the different

methods by which judges in Maryland are selected and retained and

to requirements enacted by the Maryland General Assembly or

adopted by the Court of Appeals. The intent is to make more

clear to each judge and candidate for judicial office what is

allowed and what is not allowed.

(b) Interpretive Provisions

(1) Discipline

(A) A judge may be disciplined only for violating a Rule.

If a Rule contains a permissive term, such as "may" or "should"

the conduct being addressed is committed to the personal and

professional discretion of the judge or candidate in question,

and no disciplinary action should be taken for action or inaction

within the bounds of that discretion.

-11-

Rule 18-100.1

(B) Although the text of the Rules is binding and

enforceable, it is not contemplated that every transgression will

result in the imposition of discipline.

Whether discipline

should be imposed should be determined through a reasonable and

reasoned application of the Rules and should depend upon factors

such as the seriousness of the transgression, the facts and

circumstances at the time of the transgression, the extent of any

pattern of improper activity, whether there have been previous

violations, and the effect of the improper activity upon the

judicial system or others.

(2) Accompanying Comments

(A) The Comments that accompany the Rules contain

explanatory material and, in some instances, provide examples of

permitted or prohibited conduct.

(B) Comments neither add to nor subtract from the binding

obligations set forth in the Rules.

Therefore, when a Comment

contains the term "must," it does not mean that the Comment

itself is binding or enforceable but merely signifies that the

Rule in question, properly understood, is obligatory as to the

conduct at issue.

(C) The Comments also may identify aspirational goals for

judges.

To implement fully the principles of this Code, judges

should hold themselves to the highest ethical standards and seek

to achieve those aspirational goals, thereby enhancing the

dignity of the judicial office.

(3) Rules of Reason

-12-

Rule 18-100.1

The Rules in this Code are rules of reason that should be

applied in a manner that is consistent with Constitutional

requirements, statutes, other Court Rules, and decisional law and

that gives due regard for all relevant circumstances.

The Rules

should not be interpreted to impinge upon the essential

independence of judges in making judicial decisions.

(4) Collateral Effect

This Code is not designed or intended as a basis for

civil or criminal liability.

It is also not intended to be the

basis for litigants to seek collateral remedies against each

other or to obtain tactical advantages in proceedings before a

court.

(5) Judicial Ethics Committee Opinion

In interpreting this Code, attention should be given to

the opinions of the Judicial Ethics Committee and, if

appropriate, that Committee should be asked for a written letter

of advice or a binding opinion.

Cross reference: See Rule 18-308, protecting a judge from a

charge of violating an ethics provision in this Code if the judge

has requested and received an opinion or advice letter from the

Committee and is in compliance with that opinion or advice letter

or is in compliance with a published opinion of the Committee.

Source: This Rule is new but is derived from paragraphs A-101

through A-108 of former Rule 16-813 (2016).

-13-

Rule 18-100.2

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, DEFINITIONS, AND PREAMBLE OF THE CODE

Rule 18-100.2.

SCOPE

The Rules in this Chapter apply to:

(a) Incumbent judges of the Court of Appeals, the Court of

Special Appeals, the Circuit Courts, and the District Court;

(b) Except as otherwise expressly provided in specific Rules,

incumbent judges of the Orphans' Courts;

(c) Except as otherwise expressly provided in specific Rules,

retired judges who are approved for recall for temporary service

pursuant to Maryland Constitution, Art. IV, §3A Code, Courts

Article, §1-302; and

(d) Candidates and applicants for judicial office as defined in

Rule 4.1 18-104.1, to the extent that a Rule expressly applies to

such candidates or applicants.

See Section 4 and Rule 2.11.

Source: This Rule is derived from paragraph A-109 of former Rule

16-813 (2016).

-14-

Rule 18-100.3

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, DEFINITIONS, AND PREAMBLE OF THE CODE

Rule 18-100.3.

DEFINITIONS

In the Rules in this Chapter, the following definitions

apply except as otherwise expressly provided or as necessary

implication requires:

(a)

Domestic Partner

"Domestic partner" means a person an individual with whom

another person individual maintains a household and an intimate

relationship, other than a person an individual to whom he or she

is legally married.

See Rules 2.11, 2.13, 3.13, and 3.14.

Source.- This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 1007 ABA Code.

(b)

Fiduciary

"Fiduciary" includes relationships such as administrator,

attorney-in-fact by power of attorney, personal representative,

and trustee.

See Rules 2.11, 3.2, and 3.8.

Source.- This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 1007 ABA Code.

(c)

(1)

Gift

Except as provided in paragraph (b) subsection (c)(2) of

this Rule, "gift" means the transfer of anything of economic

value, regardless of form, without adequate and lawful

consideration.

-15-

Rule 18-100.3

(2)

"Gift" does not include the solicitation, acceptance,

receipt, or regulation of a political contribution that is

regulated in accordance with:

(A) the Election Law Article of the Maryland Code; or

(B) any other Maryland law regulating the conduct of

elections or the receipt of political contributions.

See Rule

3.13.

Source.- This definition is derived from Code, State Government

Article, §15-102 (p).

(d)

Impartial

"Impartial," "impartiality," and "impartially" mean

absence of bias or prejudice in favor of, or against, particular

parties or classes of parties, as well as maintenance of an open

mind in considering issues that may come before a judge.

See

Rules 1.2, 2.2, 2.10, 2.11, 2.13, 3.1, 3.12, 3.13, 4.4, and 4.5.

Source.- This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 2007 ABA Code.

(e)

Impending Matter

"Impending matter" means a matter that is imminent or

expected to occur in the near future.

See Rules 2.9, 2.10, 3.13,

4.4, and 4.5.

Source.- This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 2007 ABA Code.

(f)

Independence

"Independence" means a judge's freedom from influence or

controls other than those established by law.

3.1, 3.12, 3.13, 4.4, and 4.5.

-16-

See Rules 1.2,

Rule 18-100.3

Source.-This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 2007 ABA Code.

(g)

Knowingly

"Knowingly," "knowledge," "known," and "knows" mean actual

knowledge of the fact in question.

A person's An individual’s

knowledge may be inferred from circumstances.

See Rules 2.11,

2.13. 2.15, 2.16, 3.6, and 4.4, and 4.5.

Source.-This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 2007 ABA Code.

(h)

Member of Judge's or Candidate's Family

"Member of a [judge's] [candidate's] family" means a

spouse, domestic partner, child, grandchild, parent, grandparent,

or other relative or person individual with whom the judge or

candidate maintains a close familial relationship.

See Rules

3.7, 3.8, 3.10, and 3.11.

Source.-This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 2007 ABA Code.

(i)

Member of Judge's or Candidate's Household

"Member of [judge's] [candidate's] household" means:

(1) if sharing the judge's or candidate's legal residence,

the judge's or candidate's spouse, domestic partner, child, ward,

financially dependent parent, or other financially dependent

relative; or

(2) the judge's or candidate's spouse, child, ward, parent,

or other relative, over whose financial affairs the judge or

candidate has legal or actual control.

See Rule 3.13.

Source.-This definition is derived from Maryland Code, State

Government Article, §15-102 (z).

-17-

Rule 18-100.3

(j)

Pending Matter

"Pending matter" means a matter that has commenced.

A

matter continues to be pending through any appellate process

until final disposition.

See Rules 2.9, 2.10, 3.13, and 4.4, and

4.5.

Source.-This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 2007 ABA Code.

(k)

Significant Financial Interest

(1) "Significant financial interest" means ownership of:

(A) an interest as the result of which the owner has

received within the past three years, is currently receiving, or

in the future is entitled to receive, more than $1,000 per year;

(B) more than 3% of a business entity; or

(C) a security of any kind that represents, or is

convertible into, more than 3% of a business entity.

(2) In applying this definition:

(A) ownership of an interest in a mutual or common

investment fund that holds a security is not ownership of the

security unless:

(i) the judge participates in the management of the fund;

or

(ii) there is before the judge a pending matter or an

impending matter that could substantially affect the value of the

interest;

(B) ownership of a government security is not a significant

financial interest in the issuer unless there is before the judge

-18-

Rule 18-100.3

a pending matter or an impending matter that could substantially

affect the value of the security;

(C) neither a deposit in a financial institution nor a

proprietary interest such as or similar to that of a depositor in

a mutual savings association, member of a credit union, or policy

holder in a mutual insurance company is a significant financial

interest in the entity unless there is before the judge a pending

matter or an impending matter that could substantially affect the

value of the deposit or interest; and

(D) an ownership interest in a security held by a

charitable, civic, educational, fraternal, sororal, or religious

organization will not be imputed to a judge merely because the

judge or the judge's child, parent, or spouse is an adviser to or

director or officer of, or otherwise actively participates in,

the organization.

Source.-This definition is derived from the former Maryland Code

of Judicial Conduct.

(l)

Third Degree of Relationship

"Third degree of relationship" includes the following

persons individuals:

great-grandparent, grandparent, parent,

uncle, aunt, brother, sister, child, grandchild, greatgrandchild, nephew, and niece.

See Rules 2.11 and 2.13.

Source.-This definition is derived from the Terminology section

of the 2007 ABA Code.

Source: This Rule is derived from paragraphs B-101 through B-112

of former Rule 16-813 (2016).

-19-

Rule 18-100.4

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, DEFINITIONS, AND PREAMBLE OF THE CODE

Rule 18-100.4.

PREAMBLE

(a) Importance of Independent, Fair, Competent, Impartial

Judiciary

An independent, fair, competent, and impartial judiciary

composed of men and women of integrity who will interpret and

apply the law that governs our society is indispensable to our

system of justice.

Thus, the judiciary plays a central role in

preserving the principles of justice and the rule of law.

Inherent in all the Rules contained in this Code are the precepts

that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and

honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to

maintain and enhance confidence in the legal system.

(b) Dignity of Judicial Office

Judges should maintain the dignity of judicial office at

all times, and avoid both impropriety and the appearance of

impropriety in their professional and personal lives.

They

should aspire at all times to conduct that ensures the greatest

possible public confidence in their independence, impartiality,

integrity, and competence.

(c) Function of Code of Judicial Conduct

This Code of Judicial Conduct establishes standards for the

-20-

Rule 18-100.4

ethical conduct of judges and judicial candidates.

It is not

intended as an exhaustive guide for the conduct of judges and

judicial candidates, who are governed in their judicial and

personal conduct by general ethical standards as well as by this

Code.

This Code is intended, however, to provide guidance and

assist judges in maintaining the highest standards of judicial

and personal conduct, and to provide a basis for regulating their

conduct through disciplinary agencies.

Source: This Preamble is derived from the Preamble section of

the 2007 ABA Code. This Rule is derived from paragraphs C-101

through C-103 of former Rule 16-813 (2016).

-21-

Rule 18-101.1

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY AND

THE AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-101.1.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW (ABA RULE 1.1)

A judge shall comply with the law, including this Code of

Judicial Conduct.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 1.1 of the 2007 ABA

Code of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-22-

Rule 18-101.2

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY AND

THE AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-101.2.

PROMOTING CONFIDENCE IN THE JUDICIARY (ABA RULE 1.2)

(a) Promoting Public Confidence

A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes

public confidence in the independence, integrity, and

impartiality of the judiciary.

(b) Avoiding Perception of Impropriety

A judge shall avoid conduct that would create in reasonable

minds a perception of impropriety.

COMMENT

[1] Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by

improper conduct and conduct that creates the appearance of

impropriety. This principle applies to both the professional and

personal conduct of a judge.

[2] A judge should expect to be the subject of public

scrutiny that might be viewed as burdensome if applied to other

persons individuals and must accept the restrictions imposed by

this Code.

[3] Conduct that compromises or appears to compromise the

independence, integrity, and impartiality of a judge undermines

public confidence in the judiciary. Because it is not

practicable to list all such conduct, the Rule is necessarily

cast in general terms.

[4] Judges should participate in activities that promote

ethical conduct among judges and lawyers attorneys, support

professionalism within the judiciary and the legal profession,

and promote access to justice for all.

-23-

Rule 18-101.2

[5] Actual improprieties include violations of law, court

rules, and this Code. The test for appearance of impropriety is

whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception

that the judge's ability to carry out judicial responsibilities

with competence, impartiality, and integrity is impaired.

[6] A judge should initiate and participate in community

outreach activities for the purpose of promoting public

understanding of and confidence in the administration of justice.

In conducting such activities, the judge must act in a manner

consistent with this Code.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 1.2 of the 2007

ABA Code. Comments [1], [2], [3], [4], and [6] are derived from

the ABA Comments to that Rule. Comment [5] is derived in part

from ABA Comment [5] to that Rule and is in part new Rule 16-813

(2016).

-24-

Rule 18-101.3

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY AND

THE AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-101.3.

AVOIDING LENDING THE PRESTIGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICE

(ABA RULE 1.3)

A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to

advance the personal or economic interests of the judge or

others, or allow others to do so.

COMMENT

[1] It is improper for a judge to use or attempt to use his

or her position to gain personal advantage or deferential

treatment of any kind. For example, it would be improper for a

judge to allude to his or her judicial status to gain favorable

treatment in encounters with traffic officials. Similarly, a

judge must not use a judicial letterhead to gain an advantage in

conducting his or her personal business.

[2] A judge may provide a reference or recommendation for

an individual based upon the judge's personal knowledge. The

judge may use an official letterhead if the judge indicates that

the reference is personal and if there is no likelihood that the

use of the letterhead would reasonably be perceived as an attempt

to exert pressure by reason of the judicial office.

[3] Judges may participate in the process of judicial

selection by cooperating with appointing authorities and

screening committees and by responding to inquiries from such

entities concerning the professional qualifications of a person

an individual being considered for judicial office.

Cross reference:

See Rule 4.3 18-104.3.

[4] Special considerations arise when judges write or

contribute to publications of for-profit entities, whether

related or unrelated to the law. A judge should not permit

anyone associated with the publication of such materials to

-25-

Rule 18-101.3

exploit the judge's office in a manner that violates this Rule or

other applicable law. In contracts for publication of a judge's

writing, the judge should retain sufficient control over the

advertising to avoid such exploitation.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 1.3 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-26-

Rule 18-102.1

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.1.

GIVING PRECEDENCE TO THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL

OFFICE (ABA RULE 2.1)

The duties of judicial office, as prescribed by law, shall

take precedence over a judge's personal and extrajudicial

activities.

COMMENT

[1] To ensure that judges are available to fulfill their

judicial duties, judges must conduct their personal and

extrajudicial activities to minimize the risk of conflicts that

would result in frequent disqualification.

[2] Although it is not a duty of judicial office unless

prescribed by law, judges are encouraged to participate in

activities that promote public understanding of and confidence in

the justice system.

[3] With respect to time devoted to personal and

extrajudicial activities, this Rule must be construed in a

reasonable manner. Family obligations, illnesses, emergencies,

and permissible extrajudicial activities may require a judge's

immediate attention. Attending to those obligations and

situations, temporary in nature, is not prohibited by this Rule

and should be dealt with in accordance with applicable vacation,

sick leave, and administrative leave policies.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.1 of the 2007

ABA Code, except that the words "all of" in that Code have been

deleted. Comments [1] and [2] are derived from the ABA Comments

to that Rule. Comment [3] is new of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-27-

Rule 18-102.2

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.2.

IMPARTIALITY AND FAIRNESS (ABA RULE 2.2)

(a) A judge shall uphold and apply the law and shall perform

all duties of judicial office impartially and fairly.

(b) A judge may make reasonable efforts, consistent with the

Maryland Rules and other law, to facilitate the ability of all

litigants, including self-represented litigants, to be fairly

heard.

COMMENT

[1] To ensure impartiality and fairness to all parties, a

judge must be objective and open-minded.

[2] Although each judge comes to the bench with a unique

background and personal philosophy, a judge must interpret and

apply the law without regard to whether the judge approves or

disapproves of the law in question.

[3] When applying and interpreting the law, a judge

sometimes may make good-faith errors of fact or law. Errors of

this kind do not violate this Rule.

[4] It is not a violation of this Rule for a judge to make

reasonable accommodations to ensure self-represented litigants

the opportunity to have their matters fairly heard.

Cross reference:

See Rule 2.6 18-102.6 Comment [2].

Source: This Rule is derived in part from former Rule 2.2 of the

2007 ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to

that Rule Rule 16-813 (2016) and is in part new.

-28-

Rule 18-102.3

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.3.

(a)

BIAS, PREJUDICE, AND HARASSMENT (ABA RULE 2.3)

A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office,

including administrative duties, without bias or prejudice.

(b)

A judge shall not, in In the performance of judicial

duties, a judge shall not, by words or conduct, manifest bias,

prejudice, or harassment based upon race, sex, gender, religion,

national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation,

marital status, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation.

A judge shall require lawyers attorneys in proceedings before the

court, court staff, court officials, and others subject to the

judge's direction and control to refrain from similar conduct.

(c)

The restrictions of paragraph section (b) of this Rule do

not preclude judges or lawyers attorneys from making legitimate

references to the listed factors, or similar factors, when they

are relevant to an issue in a proceeding.

COMMENT

[1] A judge who manifests bias or prejudice in a proceeding

impairs the fairness of the proceeding and brings the judiciary

into disrepute.

[2] A judge must avoid conduct that may reasonably be

perceived as prejudiced or biased. Examples of manifestations of

bias or prejudice include epithets; slurs; demeaning nicknames;

negative stereotyping; attempted humor based upon stereotypes;

threatening, intimidating, or hostile acts; suggestions of

-29-

Rule 18-102.3

connections between race, ethnicity, or nationality and crime;

and irrelevant references to personal characteristics. Even

facial expressions and body language can convey to parties and

lawyers attorneys in the proceeding, jurors, the media, and

others an appearance of bias or prejudice.

[3] Harassment, as referred to in paragraph section (b) of

this Rule, is verbal or physical conduct that denigrates or shows

hostility or aversion toward a person an individual on bases such

as race, sex, gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity,

disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status,

socioeconomic status, or political affiliation.

[4] Sexual harassment includes sexual advances, requests

for sexual favors, conduct of a sexual nature through the use of

electronic communication that alarms or seriously annoys another,

and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that is

unwelcome.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.3 of the 2007

ABA Code with certain style changes. The Comments are derived

from the ABA Comments to that Rule with certain style changes

Rule 16-813 (2016).

-30-

Rule 18-102.4

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.4.

(a)

EXTERNAL INFLUENCES ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (ABA RULE 2.4)

A judge shall not be swayed by public clamor or fear of

criticism.

(b)

A judge shall not permit family, social, political,

financial, or other interests or relationships to influence the

judge's judicial conduct or judgment.

(c)

A judge shall not convey or permit others to convey the

impression that any person or organization is in a position to

influence the judge.

COMMENT

[1] An independent judiciary requires that judges decide

cases according to the law and facts, without regard to whether

particular laws or litigants are popular or unpopular with the

public, the media, government officials, or the judge's friends

or family. Confidence in the judiciary is eroded if judicial

decision-making is perceived to be subject to inappropriate

outside influences.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.4 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule 16-813 (2016).

-31-

Rule 18-102.5

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.5.

(a)

COMPETENCE, DILIGENCE, AND COOPERATION (ABA RULE 2.5)

A judge shall perform judicial and administrative duties

competently, diligently, promptly, and without favoritism or

nepotism.

(b)

A judge shall cooperate with other judges and court

officials in the administration of court business.

(c)

A judge shall not wilfully fail to comply with

administrative rules or reasonable directives of a judge with

supervisory authority.

COMMENT

[1] Competence in the performance of judicial duties

requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and

preparation reasonably necessary to perform a judge's

responsibilities of judicial office.

[2] A judge should seek the necessary docket time, court

staff, expertise, and resources to discharge all adjudicative and

administrative responsibilities.

[3] Prompt disposition of the court's business requires a

judge to devote adequate time to judicial duties, to be punctual

in attending court and expeditious in determining matters under

submission, and to take reasonable measures to ensure that court

officials, litigants, and their lawyers attorneys cooperate with

the judge to that end.

[4] In disposing of matters promptly and efficiently, a

judge must demonstrate due regard for the rights of parties to be

heard and to have issues resolved without unnecessary cost or

delay. A judge should monitor and supervise cases in ways that

reduce or eliminate dilatory practices, avoidable delays, and

-32-

Rule 18-102.5

unnecessary costs.

Source: Paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Rule are derived from

Rule 2.5 of the 2007 ABA Code. Paragraph (c) is new. The

Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that Rule. This

Rule is derived from former Rule 2.5 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-33-

Rule 18-102.6

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.6.

(a)

ENSURING THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD (ABA RULE 2.6)

A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal

interest in a proceeding, or that person's lawyer attorney, the

right to be heard according to law.

(b)

A judge may encourage parties to a proceeding and their

lawyers attorneys to settle matters in dispute but shall not act

in a manner that coerces any party into settlement.

COMMENT

[1] The right to be heard is an essential component of a

fair and impartial system of justice. Substantive rights of

litigants can be protected only if procedures protecting the

right to be heard are observed.

[2] Increasingly, judges have before them self-represented

litigants whose lack of knowledge about the law and about

judicial procedures and requirements may inhibit their ability to

be heard effectively. A judge's obligation under Rule 2.2 18102.2 to remain fair and impartial does not preclude the judge

from making reasonable accommodations to protect a selfrepresented litigant's right to be heard, so long as those

accommodations do not give the self-represented litigant an

unfair advantage. This Rule does not require a judge to make any

particular accommodation.

[3] Settlement conferences and referrals to alternative

dispute resolution may play an important role in the

administration of justice. The judge plays an important role in

overseeing the settlement of disputes, but should be careful that

efforts to further settlement do not undermine any party's right

to be heard according to law. Among the factors that a judge

should consider when deciding upon an appropriate settlement

practice for a case are (a) whether the parties have requested or

voluntarily consented to a certain level of participation by the

-34-

Rule 18-102.6

judge in settlement discussions, (b) whether the parties and

their counsel attorneys are relatively sophisticated in legal

matters, (c) whether the case will be tried by the judge or a

jury, (d) whether the parties participate with their counsel

attorneys in settlement discussions, (e) whether any parties are

self-represented, and (f) the nature of the proceeding.

[4] Judges must be mindful of the effect settlement

discussions can have, not only on their objectivity and

impartiality, but also on the appearance of their objectivity and

impartiality. A judge should keep in mind the effect that the

judge's participation in settlement discussions may have on both

the judge's own views of the case and the perceptions of the

lawyers attorneys and the parties if the case remains with the

judge after settlement efforts are unsuccessful. Despite a

judge's best efforts, there may be instances when information

obtained during settlement discussions could influence a judge's

decision making during trial, and, in such instances, the judge

should consider whether disqualification may be appropriate. See

Rule 2.11 18-102.11 (a)(1).

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.6 of the 2007 ABA

Code. Comments [1], [3], and [4] are derived from the ABA

Comments to that Rule, with some modifications. Comment [2] is

new Rule 16-813 (2016).

-35-

Rule 18-102.7

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.7.

RESPONSIBILITY TO DECIDE (ABA RULE 2.7)

A judge shall hear and decide matters assigned to the judge

unless recusal is appropriate.

COMMENT

[1] Although there are times when disqualification is

necessary or appropriate to protect the rights of litigants and

preserve public confidence in the independence, integrity, and

impartiality of the judiciary, judges must be available to decide

matters that come before the courts. The dignity of the court,

the judge's respect for fulfillment of judicial duties, and a

proper concern for the burdens that may be imposed upon the

judge's colleagues require that a judge not use disqualification

to avoid cases that present difficult, controversial, or

unpopular issues.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.7 of the 2007

ABA Code, but substitutes the test of whether "recusal is

appropriate" for whether disqualification "is required by Rule

2.11 or other law." The Comment is derived from the ABA Comment

to Rule 2.7 but adds "or appropriate" in the first sentence

Rule 16-813 (2016).

-36-

Rule 18-102.8

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.8.

DECORUM, DEMEANOR, AND COMMUNICATION WITH JURORS

(ABA RULE 2.8)

(a)

A judge shall require order and decorum in proceedings

before the court.

(b)

A judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to

litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers attorneys, court staff,

court officials, and others with whom the judge deals in an

official capacity, and shall require similar conduct of lawyers

attorneys, court staff, court officials, and others subject to

the judge's direction and control.

(c)

A judge shall not commend or criticize jurors for their

verdict other than in a court order or opinion in a proceeding.

COMMENT

[1] The duty to hear all proceedings with patience and

courtesy is not inconsistent with the duty imposed in Rule 2.5

18-102.5 to dispose promptly of the business of the court.

Judges can be efficient and businesslike while being patient and

deliberate.

[2] Commending or criticizing jurors for their verdict may

imply a judicial expectation in future cases and may impair a

juror's ability to be fair and impartial in a subsequent case.

[3] A judge who is not otherwise prohibited by law from

doing so may meet with jurors who choose to remain after trial

but should be careful not to discuss the merits of the case.

-37-

Rule 18-102.8

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.8 of the 2007 ABA

Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-38-

Rule 18-102.9

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.9.

(a)

EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS (ABA RULE 2.9)

A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte

communications, or consider other communications made to the

judge out of the presence of the parties or their lawyers

attorneys, concerning a pending or impending matter, except as

follows:

(1) A judge may initiate, permit, or consider any ex parte

communication when expressly authorized by law to do so.

(2) When circumstances require it, ex parte communication for

scheduling, administrative, or emergency purposes, which does not

address substantive matters, is permitted, provided:

(A) the judge reasonably believes that no party will gain a

procedural, substantive, or tactical advantage as a result of the

ex parte communication; and

(B) the judge makes provision promptly to notify all other

parties of the substance of the ex parte communication, and gives

the parties an opportunity to respond.

(3)

A judge may obtain the advice of a disinterested expert

on the law applicable to a proceeding if the judge (A) makes

provision promptly to notify all of the parties as to the expert

consulted and the substance of the advice, and (B) affords the

-39-

Rule 18-102.9

parties a reasonable opportunity to respond.

(4)

A judge may consult with court staff and court officials

whose functions are to aid the judge in carrying out the judge's

adjudicative responsibilities, or with other judges, provided the

judge does not decide a case based on adjudicative facts that are

not made part of the record, and does not abrogate the

responsibility personally to decide the matter.

Cross reference: See Comment [1] to Rule 3.9 18-103.9,

permitting a judge to engage in prehearing and settlement

conferences.

(5)

A judge may, with With the consent of the parties, a

judge may confer separately with the parties and their lawyers

attorneys as part of a prehearing or settlement conference

conducted pursuant to Rules 17-102 (l) and 17-105 (b) the Rules

in Title 17.

(6)

When serving in a problem-solving court program of a

Circuit Court or the District Court pursuant to Rule 16-206 16207, a judge may initiate, permit, and consider ex parte

communications in conformance with the established protocols for

the operation of the program if the parties have expressly

consented to those protocols.

(b)

If a judge inadvertently receives an unauthorized ex parte

communication bearing upon the substance of a matter, the judge

shall make provision promptly to notify the parties of the

substance of the communication and provide the parties with an

opportunity to respond.

(c)

A judge shall not investigate adjudicative facts in a

-40-

Rule 18-102.9

matter independently, and shall consider only the evidence in the

record and any facts that may properly be judicially noticed.

(d)

A judge shall make reasonable efforts, including providing

appropriate supervision, to ensure that this Rule is not violated

by court staff, court officials, and others subject to the

judge's direction and control.

COMMENT

[1] To the extent reasonably possible, all parties or their

lawyers attorneys shall be included in communications with a

judge.

[2] Whenever the presence of a party or notice to a party

is required by this Rule, it is the party's lawyer attorney, or

if the party is self-represented, the party, who is to be present

or to whom notice is to be given.

[3] The proscription against communications concerning a

proceeding includes communications with lawyers attorneys, law

teachers, and other persons who are not participants in the

proceeding, except to the limited extent permitted by this Rule.

[4] A judge may consult with other judges on pending

matters, including a retired judge approved for recall, but must

avoid ex parte discussions of a case with judges who have

previously been disqualified from hearing the matter, and with

judges who have appellate jurisdiction over the matter.

[5] The prohibition against a judge investigating

adjudicative facts in a matter extends to information available

in all mediums, including electronic.

[6] A judge may consult ethics advisory committees, outside

counsel, or legal experts concerning the judge's compliance with

this Code. Such consultations are not subject to the

restrictions of paragraph subsection (a)(2) of this Rule.

Committee note: This Rule does not regulate judicial notice of

so-called “legislative facts” (facts pertaining to social policy

and their ramifications) or of law.

Cross reference:

See Rule 5-201.

Source: This Rule is derived in part from former Rule 2.9 of the

2007 ABA Code and in part from Canon 3B (6) (e) of the former

-41-

Rule 18-102.9

Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct, except paragraph (a) (6) is

new. Comments [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6] are derived from

the ABA Comments to that Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-42-

Rule 18-102.10

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.10.

JUDICIAL STATEMENTS ON PENDING AND IMPENDING

CASES (ABA RULE 2.10)

(a)

A judge shall abstain from public comment that relates to

a proceeding pending or impending in any court and that might

reasonably be expected to affect the outcome or impair the

fairness of that proceeding and shall require similar abstention

on the part of court personnel subject to the judge's direction

and control.

This Rule does not prohibit a judge from making

public statements in the course of official duties or from

explaining for public information the procedures of the court.

(b)

With respect to a case, controversy, or issue that is

likely to come before the court, a judge shall not make a

commitment, pledge, or promise that is inconsistent with the

impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of the office.

(c)

Notwithstanding the restrictions in paragraphs sections

(a) and (b) of this Rule, a judge may make public statements in

the course of official duties, may explain court procedures, and

may comment on any proceeding in which the judge is a litigant in

a non-judicial capacity.

COMMENT

[1]

This Rule's restrictions on judicial speech are

-43-

Rule 18-102.10

essential to the maintenance of the independence, integrity, and

impartiality of the judiciary.

[2] This Rule does not prohibit a judge from commenting on

proceedings in which the judge is a litigant in a personal

capacity. In cases in which the judge is a litigant in an

official capacity, such as a writ of mandamus, the judge must not

comment publicly.

[3] "Court personnel," as used in paragraph section (a) of

this Rule does not include the lawyers attorneys in a proceeding

before the judge. The comment of lawyers attorneys in this

regard is governed by Rule 3.6 19-303.6 of the Maryland Lawyers'

Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

Source: This Rule is derived principally from Canon 3B (8) and

(9) of the former Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct, which is

largely consistent with Rule 2.10 of the 2007 ABA Code. Comments

[1] and [2] are derived from the ABA Comments to Rule 2.10 of the

2007 ABA Code. Comment [3] is new. This Rule is derived from

former Rule 2.10 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-44-

Rule 18-102.11

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.11.

(a)

DISQUALIFICATION (ABA RULE 2.11)

A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in any

proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be

questioned, including the following circumstances:

(1) The judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a

party or a party's lawyer attorney, or personal knowledge of

facts that are in dispute in the proceeding.

(2) The judge knows that the judge, the judge's spouse or

domestic partner, or a person an individual within the third

degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse or

domestic partner of such a person an individual:

(A) is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director,

general partner, managing member, or trustee of a party;

(B) is acting as a lawyer an attorney in the proceeding;

(C) is a person an individual who has more than a de

minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the

proceeding; or

(D) is likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.

(3) The judge knows that he or she, individually or as a

fiduciary, or any of the following persons individuals has a

significant financial interest in the subject matter in

-45-

Rule 18-102.11

controversy or in a party to the proceeding:

(A) the judge's spouse or domestic partner;

(B) a person an individual within the third degree of

relationship to the judge; or

(C) any other member of the judge's family residing in the

judge's household.

(4) The judge, while a judge or a judicial candidate, has

made a public statement, other than in a court proceeding,

judicial decision, or opinion, that commits or appears to commit

the judge to reach a particular result or rule in a particular

way in the proceeding or controversy.

(5) The judge:

(A) served as a lawyer an attorney in the matter in

controversy, or was associated with a lawyer an attorney who

participated substantially as a lawyer an attorney in the matter

during such association;

(B) served in governmental employment, and in such capacity

participated personally and substantially as a lawyer an attorney

or public official concerning the proceeding, or has publicly

expressed in such capacity an opinion concerning the merits of

the particular matter in controversy;

(C) previously presided as a judge over the matter in

another court; or

(D) is a retired judge who is subject to recusal

disqualification under Rule 3.9 18-103.9.

-46-

Rule 18-102.11

Cross reference: See Code, Courts Article, §1-203 (c) prohibiting

a judge from hearing a case in which a partner or employee of the

judge’s former law firm is an attorney of record during a period

in which the judge is receiving a payout of his former interest

in the firm.

(b)

A judge shall keep informed about the judge's personal and

fiduciary economic interests and make a reasonable effort to keep

informed about the personal economic interests of the judge's

spouse and minor children residing in the judge's household.

(c)

A judge subject to disqualification under this Rule, other

than for bias or prejudice under paragraph subsection (a)(1) of

this Rule, may disclose on the record the basis of the judge's

disqualification and may ask the parties and their lawyers

attorneys to consider, outside the presence of the judge and

court personnel, whether to waive disqualification.

If,

following the disclosure, the parties and lawyers attorneys

agree, without participation by the judge or court personnel,

that the judge should not be disqualified, the judge may

participate in the proceeding.

The agreement shall be

incorporated into the record of the proceeding.

COMMENT

[1] Under this Rule, a judge is disqualified whenever the

judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, regardless

of whether any of the specific provisions of paragraphs

subsections (a)(1) through (5) apply. In this Rule,

"disqualification" has the same meaning as "recusal."

[2] A judge's obligation not to hear or decide matters in

which disqualification is required applies regardless of whether

a motion to disqualify is filed.

[3] By decisional law, the rule of necessity may override

the rule of recusal. For example, a judge might be required to

participate in judicial review of a judicial salary statute or

-47-

Rule 18-102.11

might be the only judge available in a matter requiring immediate

judicial action, such as a hearing on probable cause or a

temporary restraining order. When the rule of necessity does

override the rule of recusal, the judge must disclose on the

record the basis for possible disqualification and, if

practicable, use reasonable efforts to transfer the matter to

another judge.

[4] A judge should disclose on the record information that

the judge believes the parties or their lawyers attorneys might

reasonably consider relevant to a possible motion for

disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no basis

for disqualification.

[5] This procedure gives the parties an opportunity to

waive the recusal if the judge agrees. The judge may comment on

possible waiver but must ensure that consideration of the

question of waiver is made independently of the judge. A party

may act through counsel an attorney if counsel the attorney

represents on the record that the party has been consulted and

consents. As a practical matter, a judge may request that all

parties and their lawyers attorneys sign a waiver agreement.

Source: This Rule is derived in part from Rule 2.11 of the 2007

ABA Code and in part from Canon 3D of the former Maryland Code of

Judicial Conduct. Comments [1], [2], and [3] are derived from

the ABA Comments to Rule 2.11 of the 2007 ABA Code, with some

modifications. Comments [4] and [5] are new. ABA Rule 2.11 (a)

(4) and ABA Comment [6] are not included. This Rule is derived

from former Rule 2.11 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-48-

Rule 18-102.12

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.12.

(a)

SUPERVISORY DUTIES (ABA RULE 2.12)

A judge shall require court staff, court officials, and

others subject to the judge's direction and control to act in a

manner consistent with the judge's obligations under this Code.

(b)

A judge with supervisory authority for the performance of

other judges shall take reasonable measures to ensure that those

judges properly discharge their judicial responsibilities,

including the prompt disposition of matters before them.

COMMENT

[1] A judge is responsible for his or her own conduct and

for the conduct of others, such as staff, when those persons

individuals are acting at the judge's direction or control. A

judge may not direct court personnel to engage in conduct on the

judge's behalf or as the judge's representative when such conduct

would violate this Code if undertaken by the judge.

[2] Public confidence in the judicial system depends upon

timely justice. To promote the efficient administration of

justice, a judge with supervisory authority must take the steps

needed to ensure that judges under his or her supervision

administer their workloads promptly.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.12 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-49-

Rule 18-102.13

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.13.

(a)

ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS (ABA RULE 2.13)

In making administrative appointments, a judge:

(1) shall exercise the power of appointment impartially and

on the basis of merit; and

(2) shall avoid nepotism, favoritism, and unnecessary

appointments.

(b)

A judge shall not approve compensation of appointees

beyond the fair value of services rendered.

COMMENT

[1] Appointees of a judge include assigned counsel

attorneys, officials such as commissioners, special magistrates,

receivers, and guardians, and personnel such as clerks,

secretaries, and bailiffs. Consent by the parties to an

appointment or an award of compensation does not relieve the

judge of the obligation prescribed by paragraph section (a) of

this Rule.

[2] Unless otherwise defined by law, nepotism is the

appointment or hiring of any relative within the third degree of

relationship to either the judge or the judge's spouse or

domestic partner, or the spouse or domestic partner of such

relative.

Source: This Rule is derived generally from Rule 2.13 of the

2007 ABA Code, although paragraph (b) of that Rule is not

included. Comments [1] and [2] are derived from the ABA Comments

to that Rule, although ABA Comment [3] is not included. This

Rule is derived from former Rule 2.13 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-50-

Rule 18-102.14

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.14.

DISABILITY AND IMPAIRMENT OF OTHERS (ABA RULE

2.14)

A judge having a reasonable belief that the performance of a

lawyer an attorney or another judge is impaired by drugs or

alcohol or by a mental, emotional, or physical condition, shall

take appropriate action, which may include a confidential

referral to a lawyer an attorney or judicial assistance program.

COMMENT

[1] "Appropriate action" means action intended and

reasonably likely to help the judge or lawyer attorney in

question to address the problem and prevent harm to the justice

system. Depending upon the circumstances, appropriate action may

include speaking directly to the impaired person individual,

notifying an individual with supervisory responsibility over the

impaired person individual, or making a referral to an assistance

program.

[2] Taking or initiating corrective action by way of

referral to an assistance program may satisfy a judge's

responsibility under this Rule. Assistance programs have many

approaches for offering help to impaired judges and lawyers

attorneys, such as intervention, counseling, or referral to

appropriate health care professionals. Depending upon the

gravity of the conduct that has come to the judge's attention,

however, the judge may be required to take other action, such as

reporting the impaired judge or lawyer attorney to the

appropriate authority, agency, or body. See Rule 2.15 18-102.15.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.14 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-51-

Rule 18-102.15

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.15.

RESPONDING TO JUDICIAL AND LAWYER ATTORNEY

MISCONDUCT (ABA RULE 2.15)

(a)

A judge shall take or initiate appropriate corrective

measures with respect to the unprofessional conduct of another

judge or a lawyer an attorney.

(b)

If other corrective measures are not appropriate or, if

attempted, were not successful, a judge shall inform the

Commission on Judicial Disabilities of facts known to that judge

that raise a substantial question as to another judge's fitness

for office.

(c)

If other corrective measures are not appropriate or, if

attempted, were not successful, a judge shall inform the Attorney

Grievance Commission of facts known to the judge that raise a

substantial question as to a lawyer's an attorney’s honesty,

trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer an attorney in other

respects.

(d)

Acts of a judge required or permitted by paragraphs

sections (a), (b), and (c) of this Rule shall be absolutely

privileged.

-52-

Rule 18-102.15

COMMENT

[1] Permitting a judge to take "corrective" measures gives

the judge a wide range of options to deal with unprofessional

conduct. Appropriate corrective measures may include direct

communication with the judge or lawyer attorney who is believed

to have committed the violation or other direct action if

available. There may be instances of professional misconduct

that would warrant a private admonition or referral to a bar

association counseling service.

Source: This Rule is derived from Canon 3F of the former

Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct former Rule 2.15 of Rule 16-813

(2016).

-53-

Rule 18-102.16

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES

Rule 18-102.16.

COOPERATION WITH DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITIES

(ABA RULE 2.16)

(a)

A judge shall cooperate and be candid and honest with

judicial and lawyer attorney disciplinary agencies.

(b)

A judge shall not retaliate, directly or indirectly,

against a person known or suspected to have assisted or

cooperated with an investigation of a judge or a lawyer an

attorney.

COMMENT

[1] Cooperation with investigations and proceedings of

judicial and lawyer attorney discipline agencies, as required in

paragraph section (a) of this Rule, instills confidence in

judges' commitment to the integrity of the judicial system and

the protection of the public.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.16 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comment is derived from the ABA Comment to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-54-

Rule 18-103.1

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.1. EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITIES IN GENERAL (ABA RULE

3.1)

A Except as prohibited by law or this Code, a judge may

engage in extrajudicial activities, except as prohibited by law

or this Code.

When engaging in extrajudicial activities, a judge

shall not:

(a) participate in activities that will interfere with the

proper performance of the judge's judicial duties;

(b) participate in activities that will lead to frequent

disqualification of the judge;

(c) participate in activities that would appear to a reasonable

person to undermine the judge's independence, integrity, or

impartiality;

(d) engage in conduct that would appear to a reasonable person

to be coercive; or

(e) make inappropriate use of court premises, staff,

stationery, equipment, or other resources.

COMMENT

[1] To the extent that time permits, and judicial

independence and impartiality are not compromised, judges are

encouraged to engage in appropriate extrajudicial activities.

Judges are uniquely qualified to engage in extrajudicial

activities that concern the law, the legal system, and the

administration of justice, such as by speaking, writing,

-55-

Rule 18-103.1

teaching, or participating in scholarly research projects. In

addition, judges are permitted and encouraged to engage in

educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic

extrajudicial activities not conducted for profit, even when the

activities do not involve the law. See Rule 3.7 18-103.7.

[2] Participation in both law-related and other

extrajudicial activities helps integrate judges into their

communities and furthers public understanding of and respect for

courts and the judicial system.

[3] Discriminatory actions and expressions of bias or

prejudice by a judge, even outside the judge's official or

judicial actions, are likely to appear to a reasonable person to

call into question the judge's integrity and impartiality.

Examples include jokes or other remarks that demean individuals

based upon their race, sex, gender, religion, national origin,

ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic

status. For the same reason, a judge's extrajudicial activities

must not be conducted in connection or affiliation with an

organization that practices invidious discrimination. See Rule

3.6 18-103.6.

[4] While engaged in permitted extrajudicial activities,

judges must not coerce others or take action that would

reasonably be perceived as coercive. For example, depending upon

the circumstances, a judge's solicitation of contributions or

memberships for an organization, even as permitted by Rule 3.7

18-103.7 (a), might create the risk that the person solicited

would feel obligated to respond favorably, or would do so to

curry favor with the judge.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.1 of the 2007 ABA

Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-56-

Rule 18-103.2

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.2.

APPEARANCES BEFORE GOVERNMENTAL BODIES AND

CONSULTATION WITH GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS (ABA RULE 3.2)

A judge shall not appear voluntarily at a public hearing

before, or otherwise consult with, an executive or a legislative

body or official, except:

(a) in connection with matters concerning the law, the legal

system, or the administration of justice;

(b) in connection with matters about which the judge acquired

knowledge or expertise in the course of the judge's judicial

duties; or

(c) when the judge is acting self-represented in a matter

involving the judge's legal or economic interests, or when the

judge is acting in a fiduciary capacity.

COMMENT

[1] Judges possess special expertise in matters of law, the

legal system, and the administration of justice, and may properly

share that expertise with governmental bodies and officials in

the executive or legislative branch officials.

[2] In appearing before governmental bodies or consulting

with government officials, judges must be mindful that they

remain subject to other provisions of this Code, such as Rule 1.3

18-101.3, prohibiting judges from using the prestige of office to

advance their own or others' interests, Rule 2.10 18-102.10,

governing public comment on pending and impending matters, and

Rule 3.1 18-103.1 (c), prohibiting judges from engaging in

extrajudicial activities that would appear to a reasonable person

-57-

Rule 18-103.2

to undermine the judge's independence, integrity, or

impartiality.

[3] In general, it would be an unnecessary and unfair

burden to prohibit judges from appearing before governmental

bodies or consulting with government officials on matters that

are likely to affect them as private persons individuals, such as

zoning proposals affecting their real property. In engaging in

such activities, however, judges must not refer to their judicial

positions, and must otherwise exercise caution to avoid using the

prestige of judicial office.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.2 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-58-

Rule 18-103.3

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.3.

TESTIFYING AS A CHARACTER WITNESS (ABA RULE 3.3)

A Except when duly subpoenaed, a judge shall not testify as

a character witness in a judicial, administrative, or other

adjudicatory proceeding or otherwise vouch for the character of a

person in a legal proceeding, except when duly summoned.

COMMENT

[1] A judge who, without being subpoenaed, testifies as a

character witness abuses the prestige of judicial office to

advance the interests of another. See Rule 1.3 18-101.3. Except

in unusual circumstances where the demands of justice require, a

judge should discourage a party from requiring the judge to

testify as a character witness.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.3 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comment is derived from the ABA Comment to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-59-

Rule 18-103.4

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.4.

APPOINTMENT TO GOVERNMENTAL POSITIONS (ABA RULE 3.4)

A judge shall not accept appointment to a governmental

committee, board, commission, or other governmental position,

unless it is one that concerns the law, the legal system, or the

administration of justice.

COMMENT

[1] Rule 3.4 18-103.4 implicitly acknowledges the value of

judges accepting appointments to entities that concern the law,

the legal system, or the administration of justice. Even in such

instances, however, a judge should assess the appropriateness of

accepting an appointment, paying particular attention to the

subject matter of the appointment and the availability and

allocation of judicial resources, including the judge's time

commitments, and giving due regard to the requirements of the

independence and impartiality of the judiciary.

[2] A judge may not accept a governmental appointment that

could interfere with the effectiveness and independence of the

judiciary, assume or discharge an executive or legislative power,

or hold another "office" under the Constitution or laws of the

United States or the State of Maryland. See Maryland Declaration

of Rights, Articles 8, 33, and 35.

[3] A judge may represent his or her country, State, or

locality on ceremonial occasions or in connection with

historical, educational, or cultural activities. Such

representation does not constitute acceptance of a government

position.

Committee note: Although the Judicial Ethics Committee has

concluded that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution may

allow service in reserve components of the armed forces that

otherwise might be precluded under this Code, such as service as

a judge advocate or military judge, the Attorney General, rather

-60-

Rule 18-103.4

than the Judicial Ethics Committee, traditionally has rendered

opinions with regard to issues of dual or incompatible offices.

Source: This Rule is derived from Rule 3.4 of the 2007 ABA Code.

Comments [1] and [3] are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule. Comment [2] and the Committee note are derived from the

Comment and Committee note to Canon 4C of the former Maryland

Code of Judicial Conduct. This Rule is derived from former Rule

3.4 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-61-

Rule 18-103.5

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.5.

USE OF NONPUBLIC INFORMATION (ABA RULE 3.5)

A judge shall not intentionally disclose or use nonpublic

information acquired in a judicial capacity for any purpose

unrelated to the judge's judicial duties.

Nonpublic information

means information that is not available to the public.

It may

include information that is (a) sealed or shielded pursuant to

the Maryland Rules, other law, or court order, (b) impounded, (c)

communicated in camera, or (d) offered in grand jury proceedings,

pre-sentencing reports, dependency cases, or psychiatric reports.

COMMENT

[1] In the course of performing judicial duties, a judge

may acquire information of commercial or other value that is

unavailable to the public. The judge must not reveal or use such

information for personal gain or for any purpose unrelated to his

or her judicial duties.

[2] This Rule is not intended, however, to affect a judge's

ability to act on information as necessary to protect the health

or safety of the judge or a member of a judge's family, court

personnel, or other judicial officers.

Source: The first sentence of this Rule is derived from Rule 3.5

of the 2007 ABA Code. The second sentence is derived from the

Terminology section of the 2007 ABA Code. The Comments are

derived from the ABA Comments to Rule 3.5 of the 2007 ABA Code,

except that Comment [2] is modified to eliminate the words "if

consistent with other provisions of this Code." This Rule is

derived from former Rule 3.5 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-62-

Rule 18-103.6

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.6.

AFFILIATION WITH DISCRIMINATORY ORGANIZATIONS

(ABA RULE 3.6)

(a)

A judge shall not hold membership in any organization that

practices invidious discrimination on the basis of race, sex,

gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or sexual

orientation.

(b)

A judge shall not use the benefits or facilities of an

organization if the judge knows or should know that the

organization practices invidious discrimination on one or more of

the bases identified in paragraph section (a) of this Rule.

A

judge's attendance at an event in a facility of an organization

that the judge is not permitted to join is not a violation of

this Rule when the judge's attendance is an isolated event that

could not reasonably be perceived as an endorsement of the

organization's practices.

COMMENT

[1] A judge's public manifestation of approval of invidious

discrimination on any basis gives rise to the appearance of

impropriety and diminishes public confidence in the integrity and

impartiality of the judiciary. A judge's membership in an

organization that practices invidious discrimination creates the

perception that the judge's impartiality is impaired.

[2] An organization is generally said to discriminate

invidiously if it arbitrarily excludes from membership on the

-63-

Rule 18-103.6

basis of race, sex, gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity,

or sexual orientation persons individuals who would otherwise be

eligible for admission. Whether an organization practices

invidious discrimination is a complex question to which judges

should be attentive. The answer cannot be determined from a mere

examination of an organization's current membership rolls, but

rather, depends upon how the organization selects members, as

well as other relevant factors, such as whether the organization

is dedicated to the preservation of religious, ethnic, or

cultural values of legitimate common interest to its members, or

whether it is an intimate, purely private organization whose

membership limitations could not constitutionally be prohibited.

[3] When a judge learns that an organization to which the

judge belongs engages in invidious discrimination, the judge must

resign immediately from the organization.

[4] A judge's membership in a religious organization as a

lawful exercise of the freedom of religion is not a violation of

this Rule.

[5]

service.

This Rule does not apply to national or state military

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.6 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-64-

Rule 18-103.7

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.7.

PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS,

CHARITABLE, FRATERNAL, OR CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS AND ACTIVITIES

(ABA RULE 3.7)

(a)

Subject to the requirements of Rules 3.1 18-103.1 and 3.6

18-103.6, a judge may participate in activities sponsored by

organizations or governmental entities concerned with the law,

the legal system, or the administration of justice, and those

sponsored by or on behalf of educational, religious, charitable,

fraternal, or civic organizations not conducted for profit,

including the following activities:

(1) assisting such an organization or entity in planning

related to fund-raising, and participating in the management and

investment of the organization's or entity's funds;

(2) soliciting contributions for such an organization or

entity, but only from members of the judge's family, or from

judges over whom the judge does not exercise supervisory or

appellate authority;

(3) soliciting membership for such an organization or entity,

even though the membership dues or fees generated may be used to

support the objectives of the organization or entity, but only if

the organization or entity is concerned with the law, the legal

-65-

Rule 18-103.7

system, or the administration of justice;

(4) appearing or speaking at, receiving an award or other

recognition at, being featured on the program of, and permitting

his or her title to be used in connection with an event of such

an organization or entity, but if the event serves a fund-raising

purpose, the judge may participate only if the event concerns the

law, the legal system, or the administration of justice;

(5) making recommendations to such a public or private

fund-granting organization or entity in connection with its

programs and activities, but only if the organization or entity

is concerned with the law, the legal system, or the

administration of justice; and

(6) serving as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal

advisor of such an organization or entity, unless it is likely

that the organization or entity:

(A) will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily

come before the judge; or

(B) will frequently be engaged in adversary proceedings in

the court of which the judge is a member, or in any court subject

to the appellate jurisdiction of the court of which the judge is

a member.

(b)

A judge may encourage but not coerce lawyers attorneys to

provide pro bono publico legal services.

COMMENT

[1] The activities permitted by paragraph section (a) of

this Rule generally include those sponsored by or undertaken on

behalf of public or private not-for-profit educational

-66-

Rule 18-103.7

institutions, and other not-for-profit organizations, including

law-related, charitable, and other organizations.

[2] Even for law-related organizations, a judge should

consider whether the membership and purposes of the organization

or the nature of the judge's participation in or association with

the organization would conflict with the judge's obligation to

refrain from activities that reflect adversely upon a judge's

independence, integrity, and impartiality.

[3] Mere attendance at an event, whether or not the event

serves a fund-raising purpose, does not constitute a violation of

paragraph subsection (a)(4) of this Rule. It is also generally

permissible for a judge to serve as an usher or a food server or

preparer, or to perform similar functions, at fund-raising events

sponsored by educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or

civic organizations. Such activities are not solicitation and do

not present an element of coercion or abuse the prestige of

judicial office.

[4] Identification of a judge's position in educational,

religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organizations on

letterhead used for fund-raising or membership solicitation does

not violate this Rule. The letterhead may list the judge's title

or judicial office if comparable designations are used for other

persons individuals.

[5] In addition to appointing lawyers attorneys to serve as

counsel for indigent parties in individual cases, a judge may

promote broader access to justice by encouraging lawyers

attorneys to participate in pro bono publico legal services, if

in doing so the judge does not employ coercion, or abuse the

prestige of judicial office. Such encouragement may take many

forms, including providing lists of available programs, training

lawyers attorneys to do pro bono publico legal work, and

participating in events recognizing lawyers attorneys who have

done pro bono publico work.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.7 of the 2007 ABA

Code with some modifications. The Comments are derived from the

ABA Comments to that Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-67-

Rule 18-103.8

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.8.

(a)

APPOINTMENTS TO FIDUCIARY POSITIONS (ABA RULE 3.8)

A judge shall not accept appointment to serve in a

fiduciary position, such as executor, administrator, trustee,

guardian, attorney in fact, or other personal representative,

except for the an estate, or trust, or person of for a member of

the judge's family or an individual who is a member of the

judge’s family, and then only if such service will not interfere

with the proper performance of judicial duties.

(b)

A judge shall not serve in a fiduciary position if the

judge as fiduciary will likely be engaged in proceedings that

would ordinarily come before the judge, or if the estate, trust,

or ward becomes involved in adversary proceedings in the court on

which the judge serves, or one under its appellate jurisdiction.

(c)

A judge acting in a fiduciary capacity shall be subject

to the same restrictions on engaging in financial activities that

apply to a judge personally.

(d)

If a person an individual who is serving in a fiduciary

position becomes a judge, he or she must comply with this Rule as

soon as reasonably practicable, but in no event later than one

year after becoming a judge.

(e)

Paragraph Section (a) of this Rule does not apply to

-68-

Rule 18-103.8

retired judges approved for recall under Maryland Constitution,

Article IV, §3A Code, Courts Article, §1-302.

COMMENT

[1] A judge should recognize that other restrictions

imposed by this Code may conflict with a judge's obligations as a

fiduciary; in such circumstances, a judge should resign as

fiduciary. For example, serving as a fiduciary might require

frequent disqualification of a judge under Rule 2.11 18-102.11

because a judge is deemed to have an economic interest in shares

of stock held by a trust if the amount of stock held is more than

de minimis.

Source: Paragraphs (a) through (d) of this Rule are derived from

Rule 3.8 of the 2007 ABA Code. Paragraph (e) is derived from

Canon 6C of the former Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct. The

Comment is derived from the ABA Comment to Rule 3.8 of the 2007

ABA Code. This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.8 of Rule 16813 (2016).

-69-

Rule 18-103.9

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.9.

(a)

SERVICE AS ARBITRATOR OR MEDIATOR (ABA RULE 3.9)

A Unless expressly authorized by law, a judge shall not

act as an arbitrator or a mediator or perform other judicial

functions apart from the judge's official duties unless expressly

authorized by law.

(b)

A retired judge who is approved for recall for temporary

service under Maryland Constitution, Article IV, §3A Code, Courts

Article, §1-302 may conduct alternative dispute resolution (ADR)

proceedings in a private capacity only if the judge:

(1) conducts no ADR proceedings in a private capacity

relating to a case in which the judge currently is presiding

sitting;

(2) is not affiliated with a law firm, regardless of whether

the law firm also offers ADR services;

(3) discloses to the parties in each judicial proceeding over

in which the judge presides sits:

(A) the judge's professional association with any entity

that is engaged in offering ADR services;

(B) whether the judge is conducting, or has conducted

within the previous 12 months, an ADR proceeding involving any

party, attorney, or law firm involved in the judicial proceeding

-70-

Rule 18-103.9

pending before the judge; and

(C) any negotiations or agreements for future ADR services

involving the judge and any of the parties or counsel attorneys

to the case; and

(4) except if when there is no disqualification by agreement

as permitted by Rule 2.11 18-102.11 (c), does not preside over

sit in a judicial proceeding in which the judge's impartiality

might reasonably be questioned because of ADR services engaged in

or offered by the judge.

Committee note: A retired judge approved for recall may

affiliate with an entity that exclusively is engaged exclusively

in offering ADR services but may not affiliate with any entity

that also is engaged in the practice of law.

COMMENT

[1] Except as provided in paragraph section (b), this Rule

does not prohibit a judge from participating in arbitration,

mediation, or prehearing or settlement conferences performed as

part of assigned judicial duties. Rendering dispute resolution

services apart from those duties, whether or not for economic

gain, is prohibited unless it is expressly authorized by law.

Source: Paragraph (a) of this Rule is derived from Rule 3.9 of

the 2007 ABA Code. Paragraph (b) and the Committee note are

derived from Canon 4F (2) of the former Maryland Code of Judicial

Conduct and the Committee note thereto. The Comment is derived

from the ABA Comment to Rule 3.9 of the 2007 ABA Code. This Rule

is derived from former Rule 3.9 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-71-

Rule 18-103.10

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.10.

(a)

PRACTICE OF LAW (ABA RULE 3.10)

In General

Except as expressly allowed by this Rule, a judge shall

not practice law.

Cross reference:

(b)

See Code, Courts Article, §1-203.

Exceptions

(1) A judge may act self-represented in a matter involving

the judge or the judge's interest and, if without compensation,

may give legal advice to and draft or review documents for a

member of the judge's family.

(2) To the extent expressly allowed by law and subject to

other applicable provisions of this Code, a part-time judge of an

orphans' court who is a lawyer an attorney may practice law,

provided that:

(A) the judge shall not use the judge's judicial office to

further the judge's success in the practice of law; and

(B) the judge shall not practice or appear as an individual

in a matter involving the judge or the judge's interest in the

court on which the judge serves, even if another judge is

presiding appear as an attorney in the court in which the judge

serves.

-72-

Rule 18-103.10

Cross reference: See Code, Estates and Trusts Article, §2-109

for restrictions on the practice of law by a part-time judge of

an orphans' court.

COMMENT

[1] A judge may act self-represented in all legal matters,

including matters involving litigation and matters involving

appearances before or other dealings with governmental bodies. A

judge must not use the prestige of office to advance the judge's

personal or family interests. See Rule 1.3 18-101.3.

[2] Paragraphs Section (a) and subsection (b)(1) of this

Rule limit the practice of law in a representative capacity but

not in a self-represented capacity. A judge may act for himself

or herself in all legal matters, including matters involving

litigation and matters involving appearances before or other

dealings with legislative and other governmental bodies. In so

doing, however, a judge must not abuse the prestige of office for

any reason, including advancement of an interest of the judge or

the judge's family. See Rules 2.4 18-102.4 (b) and 3.2 18-103.2

(c).

[3] This Rule allows a judge to give legal advice to, and

draft legal documents for, a member of the judge's family.

Except for a part-time orphans' court judge allowed to practice

law, however, a judge must not receive any compensation from, or

act as an advocate or negotiator for, a member of the judge's

family in a legal matter.

Source: This Rule is derived from Canon 4G of the former

Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct. Comment [1] is derived from

the ABA Comment to Rule 3.10 of the 2007 ABA Code. Comments [2]

and [3] are derived from the Comment to Canon 4G of the former

Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct. This Rule is derived from

former Rule 3.10 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-73-

Rule 18-103.11

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.11.

FINANCIAL, BUSINESS, OR REMUNERATIVE ACTIVITIES

(ABA RULE 3.11)

(a)

A judge may hold and manage investments of the judge and

members of the judge's family.

(b)

Except as permitted by Rule 3.7 18-103.7, a judge shall

not serve as an officer, director, manager, general partner,

advisor, or employee of any business entity except that a judge

may manage or participate in:

(1) a business closely held by the judge or members of the

judge's family; or

(2) a business entity primarily engaged in investment of the

financial resources of the judge or members of the judge's

family.

(c)

A judge shall not engage in financial activities permitted

under paragraphs sections (a) or (b) of this Rule if they will:

(1) interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties;

(2) lead to frequent disqualification of the judge;

(3) involve the judge in frequent transactions or continuing

business relationships with lawyers attorneys or other persons

likely to come before the court on which the judge serves; or

(4) result in violation of other provisions of this Code.

-74-

Rule 18-103.11

(d)

This Rule does not apply to retired judges approved for

recall under Maryland Constitution, Article IV, §3A Code, Courts

Article, §1-302.

COMMENT

[1] Judges are generally permitted to engage in financial

activities, including managing real estate and other investments

for themselves or for members of their families. Participation

in these activities, like participation in other extrajudicial

activities, is subject to the requirements of this Code. For

example, it would be improper for a judge to spend so much time

on business activities that it interferes with the performance of

judicial duties. See Rule 2.1 18-102.1. Similarly, it would be

improper for a judge to use his or her official title or appear

in judicial robes in business advertising, or to conduct his or

her business or financial affairs in such a way that

disqualification is frequently required. See Rules 1.3 18-101.3

and 2.11 18-102.11.

[2] As soon as practicable without serious financial

detriment, the judge must divest himself or herself of

investments and other financial interests that might require

frequent disqualification or otherwise violate this Rule.

Source: Paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this Rule are derived

from Rule 3.11 of the 2007 ABA Code and the Comments are derived

from the ABA Comments to that Rule. Paragraph (d) is derived

from Canon 6C of the former Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct.

This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.11 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-75-

Rule 18-103.12

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.12.

COMPENSATION FOR EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES

(ABA RULE 3.12)

A judge may accept reasonable compensation for extrajudicial

activities permitted by this Code or other law unless such

acceptance would appear to a reasonable person to undermine the

judge's independence, integrity, or impartiality.

Cross reference: See Rule 3.9 18-103.9 requiring certain

disclosures and action by retired judges approved for recall who

provide alternative dispute resolution services.

COMMENT

[1] A judge is permitted to accept honoraria, stipends,

fees, wages, salaries, royalties, or other compensation for

speaking, teaching, writing, and other extrajudicial activities,

provided the compensation is reasonable and commensurate with the

task performed. The judge should be mindful, however, that

judicial duties must take precedence over other activities. See

Rule 2.1 18-102.1, Code, Family Law Article, §§2-406 and 2-410,

and Md. Rules 16-821 through 16-824 18-501 through 18-504.

[2] Compensation derived from extrajudicial activities may

be subject to public reporting. See Rule 3.15 18-103.15.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.12 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-76-

Rule 18-103.13

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.13.

ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, LOANS, BEQUESTS, BENEFITS,

OR OTHER THINGS OF VALUE (ABA RULE 3.13)

(a)

A judge shall not accept any gifts, loans, bequests,

benefits, or other things of value, if acceptance is prohibited

by law or would appear to a reasonable person to undermine the

judge's independence, integrity, or impartiality.

(b)

Unless otherwise prohibited by law, or by paragraph

section (a) of this Rule, a judge may accept the following:

(1) items with little intrinsic value, such as plaques,

certificates, trophies, and greeting cards;

(2) gifts, loans, bequests, benefits, or other things of

value from friends, relatives, or other persons, including

lawyers attorneys, whose appearance or interest in a proceeding

pending or impending before the judge would in any event require

disqualification of the judge under Rule 2.11 18-102.11;

(3) ordinary social hospitality;

(4) commercial or financial opportunities and benefits,

including special pricing and discounts, and loans from lending

institutions in their regular course of business, if the same

opportunities and benefits or loans are made available on the

same terms to similarly situated persons who are not judges;

-77-

Rule 18-103.13

(5) rewards and prizes given to competitors or participants

in random drawings, contests, or other events that are open to

persons who are not judges;

(6) scholarships, fellowships, and similar benefits or

awards, if they are available to similarly situated persons

individuals who are not judges, based upon the same terms and

criteria;

(7) books, magazines, journals, audiovisual materials, and

other resource materials supplied by publishers on a

complimentary basis for official use;

(8) gifts, awards, or benefits associated with the business,

profession, or other separate activity of a spouse, a domestic

partner, or other family member of a judge residing in the

judge's household, but that incidentally benefit the judge;

(9) gifts incident to a public testimonial; or

(10) invitations to the judge and the judge's spouse,

domestic partner, or guest to attend without charge:

(A) an event associated with a bar-related function or

other activity relating to the law, the legal system, or the

administration of justice; or

(B) an event associated with any of the judge's

educational, religious, charitable, fraternal or civic activities

permitted by this Code, if the same invitation is offered to

nonjudges who are engaged in similar ways in the activity as is

the judge.

-78-

Rule 18-103.13

COMMENT

[1] Whenever a judge accepts a gift or other thing of value

without paying fair market value, there is a risk that the

benefit might be viewed as intended to influence the judge's

decision in a case. Rule 3.13 18-103.13 imposes restrictions

upon the acceptance of such benefits, according to the magnitude

of the risk. Paragraph Section (b) of this Rule identifies

circumstances in which the risk that the acceptance would appear

to undermine the judge's independence, integrity, or impartiality

is low. As the value of the benefit or the likelihood that the

source of the benefit will appear before the judge increases, the

judge is prohibited under paragraph section (a) of this Rule from

accepting the gift.

[2] Gift-giving between friends and relatives is a common

occurrence, and ordinarily does not create an appearance of

impropriety or cause reasonable persons to believe that the

judge's independence, integrity, or impartiality has been

compromised. In addition, when the appearance of friends or

relatives in a case would require the judge's disqualification

under Rule 2.11 18-102.11, there would be no opportunity for a

gift to influence the judge's decision-making. Paragraph

Subsection (b)(2) of this Rule places no restrictions upon the

ability of a judge to accept gifts or other things of value from

friends or relatives under these circumstances.

[3] Businesses and financial institutions frequently make

available special pricing, discounts, and other benefits, either

in connection with a temporary promotion or for preferred

customers, based upon longevity of the relationship, volume of

business transacted, and other factors. A judge may freely

accept such benefits if they are available to the general public,

or if the judge qualifies for the special price or discount

according to the same criteria as are applied to persons who are

not judges. As an example, loans provided at generally

prevailing interest rates are not gifts, but a judge could not

accept a loan from a financial institution at below-market

interest rates unless the same rate was being made available to

the general public for a certain period of time or only to

borrowers with specified qualifications that the judge also

possesses.

[4] Rule 3.13 18-103.13 applies only to acceptance of gifts

or other things of value by a judge. Nonetheless, if a gift or

other benefit is given to the judge's spouse, domestic partner,

or member of the judge's family residing in the judge's

household, it may be viewed as an attempt to evade Rule 3.13 18103.13 and influence the judge indirectly. Where the gift or

benefit is being made primarily to such other persons

individuals, and the judge is merely an incidental beneficiary,

-79-

Rule 18-103.13

this concern is reduced. A judge should, however, remind family

and household members of the restrictions imposed upon judges and

urge them to take these restrictions into account when making

decisions about accepting such gifts or benefits.

[5] Rule 3.13 18-103.13 does not apply to contributions to

a judge's campaign for judicial office.

Source: This Rule is derived from Rule 3.13 of the 2007 ABA

Code, except that paragraph (c)(3) is eliminated, paragraphs (c)

(1) and (2) are added to paragraph (b) and provisions relating to

the reporting of gifts are covered in Rule 3.15. The Comments

are derived from the ABA Comments to Rule 3.13 of the 2007 ABA

Code. This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.13 of Rule 16-813

(2016).

-80-

Rule 18-103.14

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.14.

REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND WAIVERS OF FEES OR

CHARGES (ABA RULE 3.14)

(a)

Unless otherwise prohibited by Rule 3.1 18-103.1, Rule

3.13 18-103.13 (a), or other law, a judge may accept

reimbursement of necessary and reasonable expenses for travel,

food, lodging, or other incidental expenses, or a waiver or

partial waiver of fees or charges for registration, tuition, and

similar items, from sources other than the judge's employing

entity, if the expenses or charges are associated with the

judge's participation in extrajudicial activities permitted by

this Code.

(b)

Reimbursement of expenses for necessary travel, food,

lodging, or other incidental expenses shall be limited to the

actual costs reasonably incurred by the judge and, when

appropriate to the occasion, by the judge's spouse, domestic

partner, or guest.

COMMENT

[1] Educational, civic, religious, fraternal, and

charitable organizations often sponsor meetings, seminars,

symposia, dinners, awards ceremonies, and similar events. Judges

are encouraged to attend educational programs, as both teachers

and participants, in law-related and academic disciplines, in

furtherance of their duty to remain competent in the law.

Participation in a variety of other extrajudicial activities is

-81-

Rule 18-103.14

also permitted and encouraged by this Code.

[2] Not infrequently, sponsoring organizations invite

certain judges to attend seminars or other events on a fee-waived

or partial-fee-waived basis, and sometimes include reimbursement

for necessary travel, food, lodging, or other incidental

expenses. A judge's decision whether to accept reimbursement of

expenses or a waiver or partial waiver of fees or charges in

connection with these or other extrajudicial activities must be

based upon an assessment of all the circumstances. The judge

must undertake a reasonable inquiry to obtain the information

necessary to make an informed judgment about whether acceptance

would be consistent with the requirements of this Code.

[3] A judge must assure himself or herself that acceptance

of reimbursement or fee waivers would not appear to a reasonable

person to undermine the judge's independence, integrity, or

impartiality. The factors that a judge should consider when

deciding whether to accept reimbursement or a fee waiver for

attendance at a particular activity include:

(a) whether the sponsor is an accredited educational

institution or bar association rather than a trade association or

a for-profit entity;

(b) whether the funding comes largely from numerous

contributors rather than from a single entity and is earmarked

for programs with specific content;

(c) whether the content is related or unrelated to the

subject matter of litigation pending or impending before the

judge, or to matters that are likely to come before the judge;

(d) whether the activity is primarily educational

rather than recreational, and whether the costs of the event are

reasonable and comparable to those associated with similar events

sponsored by the judiciary, bar associations, or similar groups;

(e) whether information concerning the activity and its

funding sources is available upon inquiry;

(f) whether the sponsor or source of funding is

generally associated with particular parties or interests

currently appearing or likely to appear in the judge's court,

thus possibly requiring disqualification of the judge under Rule

2.11 18-102.11;

(g) whether differing viewpoints are presented; and

(h) whether a broad range of judicial and nonjudicial

participants are invited, whether a large number of participants

-82-

Rule 18-103.14

are invited, and whether the program is designed specifically for

judges.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 3.14 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments to that

Rule Rule 16-813 (2016).

-83-

Rule 18-103.15

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-103.15.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (ABA RULE 3.15)

A judge must shall accurately complete and timely file an

annual Statement of Financial Interests Financial Disclosure

Statement on the form and as otherwise prescribed by the Court of

Appeals pursuant to Md. Rule 16-815 18-603.

Source: This Rule is derived from Md. Rule 16-815. This Rule is

derived from former Rule 3.15 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-84-

Rule 18-104.1

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-104.1.

(a)

DEFINITIONS (ABA RULE 4.1)

Applicant

(1) "Applicant" means a person an individual who has applied

for appointment by the Governor to a judicial office.

(2) The person individual becomes an applicant when the

person individual files an application with a judicial nominating

commission and remains an applicant until the Governor makes an

appointment to that judicial office unless, prior to that time,

the person individual formally withdraws the application.

(3) If the person individual is not appointed but, pursuant

to an Executive Order of the Governor or other law, remains

eligible for appointment to another judicial office without a

further application to or recommendation from the judicial

nominating commission, the person individual remains an applicant

until the Governor makes an appointment to that other judicial

office, unless, prior to that time, the person individual

formally withdraws the application.

Cross reference:

(b)

Executive Order 01.01.2008.04 01.01.2015.09.

Candidate

"Candidate" means a candidate for election or a District

Court candidate for retention.

-85-

Rule 18-104.1

(c)

Candidate for Election

(1) "Candidate for election" means a person an individual

who:

(A) seeks initial election to a Circuit Court or an

Orphans' Court;

(B) is an incumbent judge of a Circuit Court or Orphans'

Court and seeks to retain that office through an election

conducted pursuant to Art. IV, §3, 5, or 40 of the Maryland

Constitution; or

(C) is an incumbent judge of the Court of Appeals or Court

of Special Appeals and seeks to retain that office through a

retention election conducted pursuant to Art. IV, §5A of the

Maryland Constitution.

(2) A person An individual becomes a candidate for election:

(A) as to if the individual is a newly appointed judge,

from the date the judge takes the oath of office;

(B) as to if the individual is any other incumbent judge,

from the earlier of:

(i) the date two years prior to the general election

pertaining to that judge's re-election or subsequent retention;

or

(ii) the date on which a newly appointed judge to that

court becomes a candidate in the same general election.

(C) as to if the individual is a judge who seeks election

to another judicial office, the earlier of:

(i) the date on which the judge files a certificate of

-86-

Rule 18-104.1

candidacy in accordance with Maryland election laws, but no

earlier than two years prior to the general election for that

office; or

(ii) the date on which a newly appointed judge to that

court becomes a candidate in the same general election; and

(D) as to a lawyer if the individual is an attorney who

seeks a judicial office, the date on which the lawyer attorney

files a certificate of candidacy in accordance with Maryland

election laws, but no earlier than two years prior to the general

election for the office.

(3) A person An individual who becomes a candidate under

paragraph section (c) of this Rule remains a candidate until the

general election for the office unless, prior to that time, the

person individual files a formal withdrawal of candidacy in

accordance with Maryland election laws.

(d)

District Court Candidate for Retention

"District Court candidate for retention" means an

incumbent judge of the District Court who seeks retention for an

additional term pursuant to Art. IV, §41D of the Maryland

Constitution.

A District Court judge becomes a candidate for

retention from the date one year prior to the expiration of the

judge's current term.

(e)

Political Organization

"Political organization" includes a political party, a

political committee, and a partisan organization, as those terms

are defined in Maryland Code, Election Article, §1-101.

-87-

Rule 18-104.1

Source: These definitions are new.

COMMENT

[1] This Rule is new. It Rule 18-104.1 is intended to

reflect and focus on the different ways in which judges in

Maryland are selected and retained. See Maryland Constitution,

Art. IV, §5A (appellate judges), §§3 and 5 (Circuit Court

judges), §41D (District Court judges), and §40 (Orphans' Court

judges).

(a) In all cases, a vacancy is filled by appointment by

the Governor. The appointment of appellate, District Court, and

Orphans' Court judges requires the advice and consent of the

Senate; the appointment of Circuit Court judges does not.

(b) Appellate judges then face an uncontested

plebiscite election (yes or no for continuance in office) for an

additional 10-year term, following which they face another such

election for a succeeding term.

(c) Circuit Court judges face a potentially contested

primary and general election for a 15-year term, at the end of

which, in order to remain in office, they must be appointed by

the Governor for a "bridge" term until the next election and then

prevail in that election.

(d) District Court judges do not face election but

receive a 10-year term, at the end of which, they must be

reappointed by the Governor subject to confirmation by the

Senate.

(e) Orphans' Court judges face a potentially contested

primary and general election every four years.

[2] The first context, applicable to all appellate, Circuit

Court, and District Court judges and many Orphans' Court judges,

is initial appointment by the Governor to fill a vacancy. Except

for Orphans' Court judges, that requires an application to and

consideration by a judicial nominating commission, which normally

interviews the applicants, receives information and

recommendations from Bar Associations, other interested groups,

and members of the public, and sends to the Governor a list of

recommended applicants. The Governors have agreed, expressly or

tacitly, to appoint from the list of applicants recommended by

the applicable nominating commission. The applicants may be

lawyers attorneys seeking initial appointment to the Bench,

incumbent Circuit Court judges seeking reappointment, upon the

expiration of their 15-year term, for a "bridge" period until the

next election, or other judges seeking appointment to a different

-88-

Rule 18-104.1

court. Rule 4.1 18-104.1 (a) defines those persons individuals

as "applicants."

[3] A person An individual seeking election, either through

a potentially contested election (Circuit Court and Orphans'

Court) or through a plebiscite-type retention election (appellate

judges), is defined in Rule 4.1 18-104.1 (c) as a "candidate for

election." A District Court judge, at the end of the 10-year

term, faces confirmation by the Senate for an additional term.

That judge is not a candidate for election but is defined in Rule

4.1 18-104.1 (d) as a "District Court candidate for retention."

[4] The remaining Rules in Section 4 18-104.2 through 18104.6 specify the political activity allowed or not allowed to

persons individuals falling within those categories, as well as

to incumbent judges who are not within any of them.

[5] Even when subject to election, a judge plays a role

different from that of a legislator or executive branch official.

Rather than making decisions based on the expressed views or

preferences of the electorate, a judge makes decisions based on

the law and the facts of each case. In furtherance of that

interest, judges and candidates for judicial office must, to the

greatest extent possible, be free and appear to be free from

political influence and political pressure. The Rules in Section

4 18-104.1 through 18-104.6 impose narrowly tailored restrictions

on the political and campaign activities of all judges and

candidates for judicial office.

Source: This Rule and Comments [1] through [4] are new. Comment

[5] is derived from ABA Comment [1] to Rule 4.1 of the 2007 ABA

Code. This Rule is derived from former Rule 4.1 of Rule 16-813

(2016).

-89-

Rule 18-104.2

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-104.2.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF JUDGE WHO IS NOT A CANDIDATE

(ABA RULE 4.2)

(a)

A judge who is not a candidate shall not engage in any

partisan political activity.

(b)

A judge shall resign when the judge becomes a candidate

for a non-judicial office, except that a judge may continue to

hold judicial office while a candidate for election as a delegate

to a Maryland Constitutional Convention.

Source: Rule 4.2 is derived from former Md. Code of Judicial

Conduct Canon 5A. This Rule is derived from former Rule 4.2 of

Rule 16-813 (2016).

-90-

Rule 18-104.3

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-104.3.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF APPLICANT (ABA RULE 4.3)

An applicant for judicial office may initiate communications

or contact with a judicial nominating commission or its members

and may seek endorsements for the appointment from any other

person or organization, other than a political organization.

COMMENT

[1] Rule 4.3 18-104.3 is derived in part from Rule 4.3 of

the 2007 ABA Code but departs from it in one important respect.

Under Rule 4.3 18-104.3, an applicant may initiate communications

or contact with a judicial nominating commission or its members,

but neither the Commission nor its members are obliged to respond

to such communications or contact. Applicants may appear for

interviews before the commission and may respond to questions or

inquiries from commission members, and they may solicit

endorsements from other persons or organizations (other than a

political organization). If they have a question regarding the

procedure or their application, they may contact the

Administrative Office of the Courts.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 4.3 of the 2007

ABA Code. The Comment is new. Rule 16-813 (2016).

-91-

Rule 18-104.4

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-104.4.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF CANDIDATE FOR ELECTION

(ABA RULE 4.4)

A candidate for election:

(a)

shall comply with all applicable election laws and

regulations;

(b)

shall act at all times in a manner consistent with the

independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and

maintain the dignity appropriate to judicial office;

(c)

subject to the other provisions of this Rule, may engage

in partisan political activity allowed by law with respect to

such candidacy, and, in that regard:

(1) may publicly endorse or oppose candidates for the same

judicial office;

(2) may attend or purchase tickets for dinners or other

events sponsored by a political organization or a candidate for

public office; and

(3) may seek, accept, and use endorsements from any person or

organization; but

(4) shall not act as a leader in or hold office in a

political organization, make a speech for a candidate

or

political organization, or publicly endorse a candidate for non-

-92-

Rule 18-104.4

judicial office.

(d)

As to statements and materials made or produced during a

campaign:

(1) shall review, approve, and be responsible for the content

of all campaign statements and materials produced by the

candidate or by the candidate's campaign committee or other

authorized agents;

(2) shall take reasonable measures to ensure that other

persons do not undertake on behalf of the candidate activities

that the candidate is prohibited from doing by this Rule;

(3) with respect to a case, controversy, or issue that is

likely to come before the court, shall not make a commitment,

pledge, or promise that is inconsistent with the impartial

performance of the adjudicative duties of the office;

(4) shall not make any statement that would reasonably be

expected to affect the outcome or impair the fairness of a matter

pending or impending in any court;

(5) shall not knowingly, or with reckless disregard for the

truth, misrepresent the candidate's identity or qualifications,

the identity or qualifications of an opponent, or any other fact,

or make any false or misleading statement;

(6) may speak or write on behalf of the candidate's candidacy

through any medium, including advertisements, websites, or other

campaign literature; and

(7) subject to paragraph section (b) of this Rule, may

respond to a personal attack or an attack on the candidate's

-93-

Rule 18-104.4

record.

COMMENT

[1] This Rule is derived in part from former Md. Code of

Judicial Conduct Canon 5B and from the 2007 ABA Code, but it has

been substantially reorganized into three basic segments: general

requirements (paragraphs sections (a) and (b)); the extent to

which candidates for election may engage in partisan political

conduct (paragraph section (c)); and the rules governing campaign

statements (paragraph section (d)).

[2] Rule 4.4 18-104.4 (a) requires candidates for election

to comply with all election laws and regulations. The Election

Law Article of the Maryland Code contains laws governing

candidates, campaign contributions, finance, expenditures, and

reporting. Those requirements are supplemented by regulations

adopted by the State Board of Elections. Candidates for election

must become familiar with applicable laws and regulations and

comply with them.

[3] Public confidence in the independence and impartiality

of the judiciary is eroded if judges or candidates for judicial

office are perceived to be subject to political influence.

Although they may register to vote as members of a political

party, they are prohibited by Rule 4.4 18-104.4 (c)(4) from

assuming leadership roles in political organizations.

[4] Rule 4.4 18-104.4 (c)(4) also prohibits candidates for

election from making speeches on behalf of political

organizations or publicly endorsing or opposing candidates for

public office, to prevent them from abusing the prestige of

judicial office to advance the interests of others. See Rule 1.3

18-101.3. Rule 4.4 18-104.4 does not prohibit candidates for

election from (a) campaigning on their own behalf, (b) endorsing

or opposing candidates for election to the same judicial office

for which they are running, or (c) from having their name on the

same sample ballot as a candidate for another public office.

[5] Although members of the families of candidates for

election are free to engage in their own political activity,

including running for public office, there is no "family

exception" to the prohibition in Rule 4.4 18-104.4 (c)(4) against

publicly endorsing candidates for public office. A candidate for

election must not become involved in, or be publicly associated

with, a family member's political activity or campaign for public

office. To avoid public misunderstanding, candidates for

election should take, and should urge members of their families

to take, reasonable steps to avoid any implication that they

endorse any family member's candidacy or other political

activity.

-94-

Rule 18-104.4

[6] Judicial candidates must be scrupulously fair and

accurate in all statements made by them and by their campaign

committees. Rule 4.4 18-104.4 (d)(5) obligates them to refrain

from making statements that are false or misleading, or that omit

facts necessary to make the communication considered as a whole

not materially misleading. Rule 4.4 18-104.4 (d)(1) requires the

candidate to review and approve the content of statements made by

the candidate's campaign committee or other authorized agents and

makes the candidate responsible for those statements.

[7] Candidates for election are sometimes the subject of

false, misleading, or unfair allegations made by opposing

candidates, third parties, or the media. As long as the

candidate for election does not violate Rule 4.4 18-104.4 (d), he

or she may make a factually accurate public response, although it

is preferable for someone else to respond if the allegations

relate to a pending case. If an independent third party has made

unwarranted attacks on a candidate for election's opponent, the

candidate for election may disavow the attacks and request the

third party to cease and desist.

[8] Rule 4.4 18-104.4 (d)(3) prohibits candidates for

election, with regard to cases or issues likely to come before

the court, from making a commitment, promise, or pledge that is

inconsistent with the impartial performance of the adjudicative

duties of the office. The making of a commitment, promise, or

pledge is not dependent on, or limited to, the use of any

specific words or phrases. The totality of the statement must be

examined to determine if a reasonable person would believe that

the candidate has specifically undertaken to reach a particular

result. Commitments, promises, and pledges must be contrasted

with statements or announcements of personal views on legal,

political, or other issues, which are not prohibited. When

making such statements, a judge should acknowledge the

overarching judicial obligation to apply and uphold the law,

without regard to his or her personal views.

Source: This Rule is derived in part from Rule 4.1 of the 2007

ABA Code and in part from Canon 5 of the former Maryland Code of

Judicial Conduct. The Comments are derived from the ABA Comments

to Rule 4.1 of the 2007 ABA Code. This Rule is derived from

former Rule 4.4 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-95-

Rule 18-104.5

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-104.5.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF DISTRICT COURT CANDIDATE FOR

RETENTION (ABA RULE 4.5)

A District Court candidate for retention:

(a) may contact and communicate with the Governor and members

of the State Senate regarding the candidate's reconfirmation;

(b) may seek, accept, and use endorsements from any person or

organization;

(c) shall act at all times in a manner consistent with the

independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and

maintain the dignity appropriate to judicial office;

(d) subject to paragraph section (c) of this Rule, may respond

to a personal attack or an attack on the candidate's record;

(e) with respect to a case, controversy, or issue that is

likely to come before the court, shall not make a commitment,

pledge, or promise that is inconsistent with the impartial

performance of the adjudicative duties of the office; and

(f) shall not knowingly or with reckless disregard for the

truth misrepresent the candidate's identity or qualifications or

any other fact.

-96-

Rule 18-104.5

COMMENT

[1] Because a District Court candidate for retention does

not face an election, the political activity allowed is much more

limited. It is reasonable to permit the judge to contact the

Governor, who must transmit the judge's name to the Senate, and

members of the Senate, regarding the judge's reconfirmation, and

to seek endorsements that may be helpful to the judge in that

regard. The constraints in paragraphs sections (c) through (f)

of this Rule, which are taken from Rule 4.4 18-104.4, are

applicable as well to even this political activity.

Source: This Rule and the Comment are new.

from former Rule 4.5 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-97-

This Rule is derived

Rule 18-104.6

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 100 – MARYLAND CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-104.6.

(a)

APPLICABILITY AND DISCIPLINE (ABA RULE 4.6)

A candidate who is a judge shall comply with the Rules in

this Section 4 18-104.1 through 18-104.6.

A candidate who is a

lawyer an attorney shall comply with Rule 8.2 19-308.2 of the

Maryland Lawyers' Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct

(Maryland Rule 16-812).

(b)

A successful candidate and a judge who unsuccessfully

sought a different judicial office are subject to judicial

discipline for campaign conduct.

An unsuccessful candidate who

is a lawyer an attorney is subject to attorney discipline for

campaign conduct

Source: This Rule is derived from Canon 5D of the former

Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct. This Rule is derived from

former Rule 4.6 of Rule 16-813 (2016).

-98-

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 - MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, AND DEFINITIONS

Rule 18-200.1.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Rule 18-200.2.

SCOPE

(a) District Court Commissioners and Full-time Standing

Magistrates, Examiners, and Auditors

(b) Part-time Standing Magistrates, Examiners, and Auditors

(c) Special Magistrates, Examiners, and Auditors

Rule 18-200.3.

DEFINITIONS

(a) Judicial Appointee

(b) Member of Judicial Appointee’s Family

(c) Member of Judicial Appointee’s Household

(d) Other Definitions

RULES GOVERNING INTEGRITY AND THE

AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-201.1.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW

Rule 18-201.2.

PROMOTING CONFIDENCE IN THE JUDICIARY

Rule 18-201.3.

AVOIDING LENDING THE PRESTIGE OF THE POSITION

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A

JUDICIAL APPOINTEE’S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.1.

GIVING PRECEDENCE TO THE DUTIES OF POSITION

Rule 18-202.2.

IMPARTIALITY AND FAIRNESS

Rule 18-202.3.

BIAS, PREJUDICE, AND HARASSMENT

-99-

Rule 18-202.4.

EXTERNAL INFLUENCES ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Rule 18-202.5.

COMPETENCE, DILIGENCE, AND COOPERATION

Rule 18-206.6.

ENSURING THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD

Rule 18-206.7.

RESPONSIBILITY TO DECIDE

Rule 18-202.8.

DECORUM AND DEMEANOR

Rule 18-202.9.

EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS

Rule 18-202.10.

STATEMENTS ON PENDING AND IMPENDING CASES

Rule 18-202.11.

DISQUALIFICATION

Rule 18-202.12.

SUPERVISORY DUTIES

Rule 18-202.13.

ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS

Rule 18-202.14.

DISABILITY AND IMPAIRMENT OR OTHERS

Rule 18-202.15.

RESPONDING TO JUDICIAL AND ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT

Rule 18-202.16.

COOPERATION WITH DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITIES

RULES GOVERNING EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-203.1.

EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITIES IN GENERAL

Rule 18-203.2.

APPEARANCES BEFORE GOVERNMENTAL BODIES AND

CONSULTATION WITH GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

Rule 18-203.3.

TESTIFYING AS A CHARACTER WITNESS

Rule 18-203.4.

APPOINTMENT TO GOVERNMENTAL POSITIONS

Rule 18-203.5.

USE OF NONPUBLIC INFORMATION

Rule 18-203.6.

AFFILIATION WITH DISCRIMINATORY ORGANIZATIONS

Rule 18-203.7.

PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS,

CHARITABLE, FRATERNAL, OR CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS AND

ACTIVITIES

Rule 18-203.8.

APPOINTMENTS TO FIDUCIARY POSITIONS

Rule 18-203.9.

SERVICE AS ARBITRATOR OR MEDIATOR

-100-

Rule 18-203.10.

PRACTICE OF LAW

Rule 18-203.11.

FINANCIAL, BUSINESS, OR REMUNERATIVE ACTIVITIES

Rule 18-203.12.

COMPENSATION FOR EXTRA-OFFICIAL ACTIVITIES

Rule 18-203.13.

ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, LOANS, BEQUESTS, BENEFITS,

OR OTHER THINGS OF VALUE

Rule 18-203.14.

REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND WAIVERS OF FEES OR

CHARGES

Rule 18-203.15.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

RULES GOVERNING POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Rule 18-204.1.

DEFINITIONS

(a) Applicant

(b) Candidate for Election

(c) Political Organization

Rule 18-204.2.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF JUDICIAL APPOINTEE WHO IS

NOT A CANDIDATE

Rule 18-204.3.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF APPLICANT

Rule 18-204.4.

POLITICAL CONDUCT OF CANDIDATE FOR ELECTION

Rule 18-204.5.

APPLICABILITY AND DISCIPLINE

-101-

Rule 18-200.1

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, AND DEFINITIONS

Rule 18-200.1.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

This Code of Conduct for Judicial Appointees governs the

conduct of judicial appointees.

It is patterned after the

Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct (MCJC) set forth in Rule 16-813

Title 18, Chapter 100, and the provisions of this Code should be

read in a consistent manner with parallel provisions in the MCJC.

This Code sets forth minimum standards and is not intended

as a limitation on an appointing authority's power to impose

additional requirements.

Source: This Rule is derived from the Preamble Section of former

Rule 16-814 (2016).

-102-

Rule 18-200.2

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, AND DEFINITIONS

Rule 18-200.2.

(a)

SCOPE

District Court Commissioners and Full-time Standing

Magistrates, Examiners, and Auditors

This Code applies in its entirety to District Court

Commissioners and full-time standing magistrates, examiners, and

auditors.

(b)

Part-time Standing Magistrates, Examiners, and Auditors

Except as otherwise provided in a specific Rule, this Code

applies in its entirety to part-time standing magistrates,

examiners, and auditors.

(c)

Special Magistrates, Examiners, and Auditors

During the period of their serving in that capacity,

special magistrates, examiners, and auditors are subject only to

the Rules in Sections 1 and 2 18-200.1 through 18-202.16, to Rule

3.5 18-203.5, and to such of the Comments to those Rules as are

relevant, given the limited duration of the service.

Special

magistrates, examiners, and auditors shall, however, on request

of a party or the appointing authority, disclose any

extra-official activity or interests covered by the other Rules

in this Code that may be grounds for a motion to recuse under

Rule 2.11 18-202.11.

-103-

Rule 18-200.2

Source.-This provision is new.

Committee note: District Court Commissioners, despite the number

of hours they may actually be on duty, are regarded as full-time

judicial appointees. Auditors, examiners, and magistrates may

fall into several categories.

Under Code, Courts Article, §2-102, all courts may appoint a

magistrate, examiner, or auditor in "a specific proceeding."

Under Code, Courts Article, §2-501, the judges of the circuit

courts have more general authority to employ magistrates,

examiners, and auditors. That authority is extended and made

more specific in Rules 2-541 (Magistrates), 2-542 (Examiners),

and 2-543 (Auditors).

Rules 2-541, 2-542, and 2-543 create two categories of

magistrates, examiners, and auditors - standing and special.

Standing magistrates, examiners, and auditors are employed to

deal with whatever cases are referred to them on an on-going

basis, but their employment by the court may be full-time or

part-time. Special magistrates, examiners, and auditors are

appointed "for a particular action," and thus, like appointments

made under Code, Courts Article, §2-102, their service is limited

to the particular action or proceeding. During that period of

service, however, it is possible that they may work full-time or

part-time, as necessary or as directed by the court. A

magistrate, examiner, or auditor may therefore be standing

full-time, standing part-time, special full-time, or special

part-time.

This Code, in its entirety, applies to District Court

Commissioners and full-time standing magistrates, examiners, and

auditors. Because their employment by the court is full-time and

more-or-less permanent, it is appropriate to limit some of their

extra-official activities in the same manner as judges. Standing

magistrates, examiners, and auditors who work only part-time but

whose employment is also more-or-less permanent and who handle

whatever cases are referred to them also need to be subject to

most of the requirements and limitations in the Code, but it is

impractical to preclude them from engaging in other lawful

remunerative activities, such as practicing law or accounting or

providing ADR services. They are subject to the entire Code,

except as provided in specific Rules. Special magistrates,

examiners, and auditors, appointed for only one proceeding, are

subject to those Rules governing such things as fairness,

impartiality, integrity, and diligence during the period of their

service, but, with the exception of Rule 18-203.5, it is

impractical and unnecessary to subject them across-the-board to

the Rules in Section 4 or most of the Rules in Section 3 18-203.1

through 18-204.5 (political and extra-official activities),

provided that, upon request of a party or the appointing

-104-

Rule 18-200.2

authority, they disclose any activity or interest that may be

cause for recusal.

Source: This Rule is derived from the Application Section of

former Rule 16-814 (2016).

-105-

Rule 18-200.3

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

GENERAL PROVISIONS, SCOPE, AND DEFINITIONS

Rule 18-200.3.

(a)

DEFINITIONS

Judicial Appointee

"Judicial appointee" means:

(1) an auditor, examiner, or magistrate appointed by a court

of this State; and

Cross reference:

See Rules 2-541, 2-542, and 2-543.

(2) a District Court commissioner appointed pursuant to

Article IV, §41G of the Maryland Constitution.

Source: With style changes this definition is derived from the

former Code of Conduct for Judicial Appointees.

Cross reference: For the definition of "judicial appointee" for

purposes of filing a financial disclosure statement, see Rule

16-816 18-604.

(b)

Member of Judicial Appointee's Family

"Member of judicial appointee's family" means a spouse,

domestic partner, child, grandchild, parent, grandparent, or

other relative or person individual with whom the judicial

appointee maintains a close familial relationship.

Source: This definition is derived from Section B-108 of the

MCJC.

(c)

Member of Judicial Appointee's Household

"Member of judicial appointee's household" means:

(1) if sharing the judicial appointee's legal residence, the

-106-

Rule 18-200.3

judicial appointee's spouse, domestic partner, child, ward,

financially dependent parent, or other financially dependent

relative; or

(2) the judicial appointee's spouse, domestic partner,

child, ward, parent, or other relative over whose financial

affairs the judicial appointee has legal or actual control.

Source:

MCJC.

(d)

This definition is derived from Section B-109 of the

Other Definitions

As to a judicial appointee, "domestic partner,"

"fiduciary," "gift," "impartial, impartiality, and impartially,"

"impending matter," "independence," "knowingly, knowledge, known,

and knows," "pending matter," "significant financial interest,"

and "third degree of relationship" have the meanings set forth,

respectively, in Sections B-101, B-102, B-103, B-104, B-105,

B-106, B-107, B-110, and B-111, and B-112 of the MCJC Rule 18100.3 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (j), (k), and (l) of the

Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct.

Source: This Rule is derived from the Definitions Section of

former Rule 16-814 (2016).

-107-

Rule 18-201.1

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING INTEGRITY AND THE AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-201.1.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW

A judicial appointee shall comply with the law, including

the Rules in this Code of Conduct for Judicial Appointees that

are applicable.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 1.1 of the MCJC

Rule 16-814 (2016).

-108-

Rule 18-201.2

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING INTEGRITY AND THE AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-201.2.

(a)

PROMOTING CONFIDENCE IN THE JUDICIARY

A judicial appointee shall act at all times in a manner

that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity,

and impartiality of the judiciary.

(b)

A judicial appointee shall avoid conduct that would create

in reasonable minds a perception of impropriety.

COMMENT

[1] Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by

improper conduct and conduct that creates the appearance of

impropriety. This principle applies to both the professional and

personal conduct of a judicial appointee.

[2]

A judicial appointee should expect to be the subject

of public scrutiny that might be viewed as burdensome if applied

to other citizens, and must accept the restrictions imposed by

this Code.

[3] Conduct that compromises or appears to compromise the

independence, integrity, and impartiality of a judicial appointee

undermines public confidence in the judiciary. Because it is not

practicable to list all such conduct, the Rule is necessarily

cast in general terms.

[4] Judicial appointees should participate in activities

that promote ethical conduct among judicial appointees and

lawyers attorneys support professionalism within the judiciary

and the legal profession, and promote access to justice for all.

[5] Actual improprieties include violations of law, court

rules, and this Code. The test for appearance of impropriety is

whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception

that the judicial appointee's ability to carry out the

responsibilities of the judicial appointee's position with

competence, impartiality, and integrity is impaired.

-109-

Rule 18-201.2

[6] A judicial appointee should, where appropriate,

initiate and participate in community outreach activities for the

purpose of promoting public understanding of and confidence in

the administration of justice. In conducting such activities,

the judicial appointee must act in a manner consistent with this

Code.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 1.2 of the MCJC

Rule 16-814 (2016).

-110-

Rule 18-201.3

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING INTEGRITY AND THE AVOIDANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

Rule 18-201.3.

AVOIDING LENDING THE PRESTIGE OF THE POSITION

A judicial appointee shall not lend the prestige of the

judicial appointee's position to advance the personal or economic

interests of the judicial appointee or others, or allow others to

do so.

COMMENT

[1] It is improper for a judicial appointee to use or

attempt to use his or her position to gain personal advantage or

deferential treatment of any kind. For example, it would be

improper for a judicial appointee to allude to his or her

official status to gain favorable treatment in encounters with

traffic officials. Similarly, a judicial appointee must not use

an official letterhead to gain an advantage in conducting his or

her personal business.

[2] A judicial appointee may provide a reference or

recommendation for an individual based upon the judicial

appointee's personal knowledge. The judicial appointee may use

an official letterhead if the judicial appointee indicates that

the reference is personal and if there is no likelihood that the

use of the letterhead would reasonably be perceived as an attempt

to exert pressure by reason of the judicial appointee's

position.

[3] Judicial appointees may participate in the process of

judicial selection by cooperating with appointing authorities and

screening committees and by responding to inquiries from such

entities concerning the professional qualifications of a person

an individual being considered for judicial office.

Cross reference: See Rule 18-204.3.

[4] Special considerations arise when judicial appointees

write or contribute to publications of for-profit entities,

whether related or unrelated to the law. A judicial appointee

-111-

Rule 18-201.3

should not permit anyone associated with the publication of such

materials to exploit the judicial appointee's position in a

manner that violates this Rule or other applicable law. In

contracts for publication of a judicial appointee's writing, the

judicial appointee should retain sufficient control over the

advertising to avoid such exploitation.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 1.3 of MCJC Rule

16-814 (2016).

-112-

Rule 18-202.1

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.1.

GIVING PRECEDENCE TO THE DUTIES OF POSITION

The duties of the judicial appointee's position, as

prescribed by law and by the conditions and requirements imposed

by the appointing authority, shall take precedence over a

judicial appointee's personal and extra-official activities.

COMMENT

[1] To ensure that judicial appointees are available to

fulfill their official duties, judicial appointees must conduct

their personal and extra-official activities to minimize the risk

of conflicts that would result in frequent disqualification.

[2] Although it is not a duty of a judicial appointee's

position unless prescribed by law, judicial appointees are

encouraged to participate in activities that promote public

understanding of and confidence in the justice system.

[3] With respect to time devoted to personal and

extra-official activities, this Rule must be construed in a

reasonable manner. Family obligations, illnesses, emergencies,

and other permissible extra-official activities may require a

judicial appointee's immediate attention. Attending to those

obligations and situations, temporary in nature, is not

prohibited by this Rule and should be dealt with in accordance

with applicable vacation, sick leave, and administrative leave

policies. Judicial appointees must not permit their other

activities to interfere with their ability to perform the duties

of their public position.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.1 of MCJC Rule

16-814 (2016). The last sentence of Comment [3] is new.

-113-

Rule 18-202.2

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.2.

IMPARTIALITY AND FAIRNESS

(a) A judicial appointee shall uphold and apply the law and

shall perform all duties of the position impartially and fairly.

(b) A judicial appointee may make reasonable efforts,

consistent with the Maryland Rules and other law, to facilitate

the ability of all litigants, including self-represented

litigants, to be fairly heard.

COMMENT

[1] To ensure impartiality and fairness to all parties, a

judicial appointee must be objective and open-minded.

[2] Although each judicial appointee comes to the position

with a unique background and personal philosophy, a judicial

appointee must interpret and apply the law without regard to

whether the judicial appointee approves or disapproves of the law

in question.

[3] When applying and interpreting the law, a judicial

appointee sometimes may make good-faith errors of fact or law.

Errors of this kind do not violate this Rule.

[4] It is not a violation of this Rule for a judicial

appointee to make reasonable accommodations to ensure

self-represented litigants the opportunity to have their matters

fairly heard.

Cross reference:

See Rule 2.6 18-202.6 Comment [2].

Source: This Rule is derived in part from former Rule 2.2 of MCJC

Rule 16-814 (2016) and is in part new.

-114-

Rule 18-202.3

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.3.

(a)

BIAS, PREJUDICE, AND HARASSMENT

A judicial appointee shall perform the duties of the

position, including administrative duties, without bias or

prejudice.

(b)

A judicial appointee shall not, in In the performance of

the judicial appointee's duties, a judicial appointee shall not,

by words or conduct, manifest bias, prejudice, or harassment

based upon race, sex, gender, religion, national origin,

ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status,

socioeconomic status, or political affiliation. A judicial

appointee shall require lawyers attorneys in proceedings before

the judicial appointee, court staff, court officials, and others

subject to the judicial appointee's direction and control to

refrain from similar conduct.

(c)

The restrictions of paragraph section (b) of this Rule do

not preclude judicial appointees or lawyers attorneys from making

legitimate references to the listed factors, or similar factors,

when they are relevant to an issue in a proceeding.

COMMENT

[1] A judicial appointee who manifests bias or prejudice in

a proceeding impairs the fairness of the proceeding and brings

the judiciary into disrepute.

-115-

Rule 18-202.3

[2] A judicial appointee must avoid conduct that may

reasonably be perceived as prejudiced or biased. Examples of

manifestations of bias or prejudice include epithets, slurs,

demeaning nicknames, negative stereotyping, attempted humor based

upon stereotypes, threatening, intimidating, or hostile acts,

suggestions of connections between race, ethnicity, or

nationality and crime, and irrelevant references to personal

characteristics. Even facial expressions and body language can

convey to parties and lawyers attorneys in the proceeding, the

media, and others an appearance of bias or prejudice.

[3] Harassment, as referred to in paragraph section (b) of

this Rule, is verbal or physical conduct that denigrates or shows

hostility or aversion toward a person individual on bases such as

race, sex, gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity,

disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status,

socioeconomic status, or political affiliation.

[4] Sexual harassment includes sexual advances, requests

for sexual favors, conduct of a sexual nature through the use of

electronic communication that alarms or seriously annoys another,

and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that is

unwelcome.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.3 of MCJC Rule

16-814 (2016).

-116-

Rule 18-202.4

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.4.

(a)

EXTERNAL INFLUENCES ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

A judicial appointee shall not be swayed by public clamor

or fear of criticism.

(b)

A judicial appointee shall not permit family, social,

political, financial, or other interests or relationships to

influence the judicial appointee's official conduct or judgment.

(c)

A judicial appointee shall not convey or permit others to

convey the impression that any person or organization is in a

position to influence the judicial appointee.

COMMENT

[1] An independent judiciary requires that judicial

appointees decide matters according to the law and facts, without

regard to whether particular laws or litigants are popular or

unpopular with the public, the media, government officials, or

the judicial appointee's friends or family. Confidence in the

judiciary is eroded if a judicial appointee's decision-making is

perceived to be subject to inappropriate outside influences.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.4 of MCJC Rule

16-814 (2016).

-117-

Rule 18-202.5

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.5.

(a)

COMPETENCE, DILIGENCE, AND COOPERATION

A judicial appointee shall perform the duties of the

position competently, diligently, promptly, and without

favoritism or nepotism.

(b)

A judicial appointee shall cooperate with judges, other

judicial appointees of the court, and court officials in the

administration of court business.

(c)

A judicial appointee shall not wilfully fail to comply

with administrative rules or reasonable directives of a judge or

other judicial appointee with supervisory authority.

COMMENT

[1] Competence in the performance of a judicial appointee's

duties requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and

preparation reasonably necessary to perform the responsibilities

of the position.

[2] A judicial appointee should seek the necessary docket

time, court staff, expertise, and resources to discharge the

judicial appointee's responsibilities.

[3] Prompt disposition of the court's business requires a

judicial appointee to devote adequate time to the position in

accordance with the requirements imposed by the appointing

authority, to be punctual in attendance and expeditious in

determining matters under submission, and to take reasonable

measures to ensure that court officials, litigants, and their

lawyers attorneys cooperate with the judicial appointee to that

end.

-118-

Rule 18-202.5

[4] In disposing of matters promptly and efficiently, a

judicial appointee must demonstrate due regard for the rights of

parties to be heard and to have issues resolved without

unnecessary cost or delay. A judicial appointee should monitor

and supervise cases in ways that reduce or eliminate dilatory

practices, avoidable delays, and unnecessary costs.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.5 of MCJC Rule

16-814 (2016).

-119-

Rule 18-202.6

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.6.

(a)

ENSURING THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD

A judicial appointee shall accord to every person who has

a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person's lawyer

attorney, the right to be heard according to law.

(b)

A judicial appointee may encourage parties to a proceeding

and their lawyers attorneys to settle matters in dispute but

shall not act in a manner that coerces any party into settlement.

COMMENT

[1] The right to be heard is an essential component of a

fair and impartial system of justice. Substantive rights of

litigants can be protected only if procedures protecting the

right to be heard are observed.

[2] Increasingly, judicial appointees have before them

self-represented litigants whose lack of knowledge about the law

and about judicial procedures and requirements may inhibit their

ability to be heard effectively. A judicial appointee's

obligation under Rule 2.2 18-202.2 to remain fair and impartial

does not preclude the judicial appointee from making reasonable

accommodations to protect a self-represented litigant's right to

be heard, so long as those accommodations do not give the

self-represented litigant an unfair advantage. This Rule does

not require a judicial appointee to make any particular

accommodation.

[3] Settlement conferences and referrals to alternative

dispute resolution may play an important role in the

administration of justice. A judicial appointee may play an

important role in overseeing the settlement of disputes, but

should be careful that efforts to further settlement do not

undermine any party's right to be heard according to law. Among

the factors that a judicial appointee should consider when

deciding upon an appropriate settlement practice for a case are

-120-

Rule 18-202.6

(a) whether the parties have requested or voluntarily consented

to a certain level of participation by the judicial appointee in

settlement discussions, (b) whether the parties and their counsel

attorneys are relatively sophisticated in legal matters, (c)

whether the case will be tried by a judge or a jury, (d) whether

the parties participate with their counsel attorneys in

settlement discussions, (e) whether any parties are

self-represented, and (f) the nature of the proceeding.

[4] Judicial appointees must be mindful of the effect

settlement discussions can have, not only on their objectivity

and impartiality, but also on the appearance of their objectivity

and impartiality. A judicial appointee should keep in mind the

effect that the judicial appointee's participation in settlement

discussions may have on both the judicial appointee's own views

of the case and the perceptions of the lawyers attorneys and the

parties if the case remains with the judicial appointee after

settlement efforts are unsuccessful. Despite a judicial

appointee's best efforts, there may be instances when information

obtained during settlement discussions could influence a judicial

appointee's decision making during proceedings, and, in such

instances, the judicial appointee should consider whether

disqualification may be appropriate. See Rule 2.11 18-202.11

(a)(1).

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.6 of MCJC Rule

16-814 (2016).

-121-

Rule 18-202.7

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.7.

RESPONSIBILITY TO DECIDE

A judicial appointee shall hear and decide matters assigned

to the judicial appointee unless recusal is appropriate.

COMMENT

[1] Although there are times when disqualification is

necessary or appropriate to protect the rights of litigants and

preserve public confidence in the independence, integrity, and

impartiality of the judiciary, judicial appointees must be

available to decide matters that come before them. The dignity

of the court, the judicial appointee's respect for fulfillment of

the duties of the position, and a proper concern for the burdens

that may be imposed upon the judges and the judicial appointee's

colleagues require that a judicial appointee not use

disqualification to avoid cases that present difficult,

controversial, or unpopular issues.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.7 of MCJC Rule

16-814 (2016).

-122-

Rule 18-202.8

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.8.

(a)

DECORUM AND DEMEANOR

A judicial appointee shall require order and decorum in

proceedings before the judicial appointee.

(b)

A judicial appointee shall be patient, dignified, and

courteous to litigants, witnesses, lawyers attorneys, court

staff, court officials, and others with whom the judicial

appointee deals in an official capacity, and shall require

similar conduct of lawyers attorneys, court staff, court

officials, and others subject to the judicial appointee's

direction and control.

COMMENT

[1] The duty to hear all proceedings with patience and

courtesy is not inconsistent with the duty imposed in Rule 2.5

18-202.5 to dispose promptly of the business of the court.

Judicial appointees can be efficient and businesslike while being

patient and deliberate.

Source: This Rule is derived from former Rule 2.8 of the MCJC,

except that Comments [2] and [3] were deleted Rule 16-814 (2016).

-123-

Rule 18-202.9

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE

TITLE 18 – JUDGES AND JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

CHAPTER 200 – MARYLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDICIAL APPOINTEES

RULES GOVERNING THE PERFORMANCE OF A JUDICIAL APPOINTEE'S DUTIES

Rule 18-202.9.

(a)

EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS

A judicial appointee shall not initiate, permit, or

consider ex parte communications, or consider other

communications made to the judicial appointee out of th

This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE | Frix